Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PERSONAL ESSAY (Screen Acting)
PERSONAL ESSAY (Screen Acting)
referring to when using the word “invisible”? Is he talking about the intangible as in smells or
flavors? Or invisible as in things the human kind has never seen, like magic, fairies and
What Stanislavski meant with “invisible” were the internal motivations, emotions, desires,
thoughts and fears of the characters. Everything that goes on inside their heads that we cannot
see as an audience. Everything they do not explicitly say. And as an audience, there is no way to
“Make visible the invisible” is a famous interpretation from Stanislavski’s ideas. Quote that
exists thanks to the understanding of his fundamental works such as “An Actor’s Work” or “An
Actor Prepares”. Quote that has helped me understand and put in practice what I have learned
throughout these 4 months, all summed up and showed in a scene my classmate Sara Cristina
Alexandre de Sousa Machado and I presented for the final exam of the “Screen Acting
Foundations” course.
The following essay explains the whole creative process I had to go through and how practice
and theory linked and supported each other. This starts from why we chose this scene to my final
1
The chosen scene in question corresponds to the 1994 series "Friends", where characters Monica
and Rachel have an argument due to Rachel trying to tell her ex-boyfriend, Ross, that she still
loves him.
Sara and I chose this scene, because we both enjoy the series. The scene is comedic, seems light
I personally chose to play Rachel, because I have been through a similar situation and thought it
would be a good idea to use that memory to help me perform the scene, so I can compare what I
What Rachel wants from Monica is for her to approve her love for Ross.
I came to this conclusion, because as a reader I could tell about their best friend relationship.
which is the reason they talk to each other so confidently and fearless of saying things, because
they know each other very well. Moreover, it is explicitly said that in this relationship that
Monica is in charge of making Rachel’s decisions and both of them are fine with it. She has done
it for years, so Rachel trusts her by now. It is also known that they care for each other, even
though it is not the best way to show her love, Monica is trying to protect Rachel from making
mistakes that may hurt her, she wants the best for her and Ross is not it. Meanwhile, Rachel
looks up to her and wants her most valued friend to approve of what she does and believes that is
right.
2
My three adjectives for Monica were: correct, trustworthy and manipulative.
“Correct”, because she believes everything she does is right, neat and perfect. She always has the
right answers, so in order for the world to be just as perfect as her, everything has to be done her
“Trustworthy” has been already explained and it’s the reason of her long-lasting relationship.
Finally, she is “manipulative”, since she is trying to make Rachel think challenging her and
making her own decisions without her help for the first time is wrong.
The context and location of the scene changed completely from the initial idea. The genre used
to be comedy, now it changed to a drama and what before used to be a hallway is now
somewhere in the crowd with a person giving a pep talk in front of us.
This exercise was really helpful, because this way we stopped wanting to imitate how the actors
did the scene in the series. We started playing and trying new things that we were not expecting,
like changing the positions of power, the adjectives, adding props, taking out things, etc.
We ended up choosing the pep talk one. It was really fun and felt comfortable.
Regarding feedback, I was told to go back to Meisner, so I asked myself the following questions:
What is my objective? What do I want from her? What are my strategies? Will it work if I yell at
Another thing I learned was that the text should not limit me, a scene can take a 360-degree turn
depending on how do you say it and the context you give to it. Not everything is predetermined.
3
Keeping that in mind…
I knew I had to work on anticipation, because I am aware it is still hard for me to stay in the
moment and not think of what is coming next. Actors know the whole story, the why’s,
because’s, resolution, ques, reactions, every part of it is already written and arranged, there are
no surprises, but the characters are living the events for the first time and they do not have a clue
on what is coming next, so we shouldn’t show that we know what they do not.
I rehearsed my lines with no intentions and tried to keep all the knowledge inside. I also
practiced saying the lines with different tones of voice, volume, movements and intensity. I
played with them and with my body, going from big to small and so on. Daring to try things no
matter how strange and incorrect they may seem with the Grotowski method, because as he said
“To act is to react” and that actors should project themselves into the unknown.
Exam Day
I honestly felt confused with the feedback the teacher was giving me, I did not know how to
show my interest in talking to Monica, but also showing that we were at a pep talk and not
forgetting that the camera had to be able to see it all, but without me looking at the camera.
I felt overwhelmed. The teacher told me I know how to do this, I have conversations with people
all the time, and it is just like that. The tricky part is that since we are so used to it we are not
aware of the small movements we make, how we react, the time we take to think between
phrases, etc. So, again I had to just be in the situation while keeping in mind who my character
is, if I know who I am then I know how they will react, they are people too.
4
The silences and giving it a little time to react and think between lines was another thing. In my
head I was thinking as the character, listening, taking my time to react organically and then
speaking, but that train of thought was not being shown, the audience may have thought the
silence is because I forgot my line, they can’t tell what is going on in my head and that takes me
All of the character’s thoughts, feelings and emotions will float to the surface in the eyes of the
People show how they feel by the way they act. These two are strongly connected, since actions
Actions can be a strategy we use to get what we want, no matter if they are done consciously or
unconsciously.
To set an example, hunger. Claudio is hungry so he eats a tangerine. By taking the tangerine on
his hands and eating it, it can be deducted that Claudio was hungry, he needed to eat and in order
to calm his hunger he decided to act upon the problem and eat. Now he is satisfied.
There is a need to fulfill, a trigger that was activated and an action made.
This example can also take a turn, it depends on how Claudio eats the tangerine that the audience
can know the context and what has led him to eat the fruit. For example, if Claudio eats the
tangerine quickly and abruptly, barely breathing and without thinking about it before doing it, the
audience will deduct that he hasn’t eaten in days and was starving.
5
To “make visible the invisible” is the actor's ability to express a character's internal emotions and
motivations authentically and convincingly, even if they are not explicitly written to be said.
There is a subtext.
For instance, Millie is feeling down, but she has to hide her sadness while interacting with her
friends. In the script, there may not be specific indications about Millie’s sadness or lines in
which she explicitly says "I'm sad", but the actor, following the said principle, will look for ways
Like using her body language, facial expression and voice intonation to reveal Millie’s inner
monologue.
All of this can be exemplified as an iceberg. There is an inside and outside world, the bottom of
the iceberg houses what is not seen, the inside world, such as the character’s desires, deep fears,
memories, trauma and treasures like the important use of silence, which if used well says much
more than a great text. A story can be told with silence only.
As we approach the tip of the iceberg, before leaving the inner world, we can find the character’s
internal monologue, the inner speech, where the character can “hear” her own thoughts passing
by and the subtext, what is implicit in the text depending on how it is said and in what context it
is said. For example, Lola and Anthony used to date, they see each other after a long time and
Anthony asks how is her dog doing (implying Anthony wants to know if her dog still remembers
him), Lola says her dog misses him (implying she misses him, but does not want to admit it)
The outside world would be what we can see, meaning the text and actions
6
Another important point to add is the triggers. Every line we say and everything we do has been
activated by a trigger, it is the response to it. So, looking for that trigger and being aware of what
it is will help to discover why did your character do what they did.
Final Thoughts
It was a process full of ups and downs, but overall, I enjoyed it.
I want to conclude this essay by saying that listening, staying in the moment and showing makes