Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drone Clinic Business Proposal Mitigating Drug Abuse in Philadelphia, United States
Drone Clinic Business Proposal Mitigating Drug Abuse in Philadelphia, United States
DRONE Clinic presents an innovative solution to mitigate the alarming drug abuse
crisis among teenagers and adults in Philadelphia, United States. By establishing a
state-of-the-art facility and implementing a comprehensive, evidence-based
approach, DRONE Clinic aims to provide accessible, effective, and compassionate
care to those struggling with substance use disorders. Our multidisciplinary team of
experienced professionals will offer a range of services, including medical treatment,
behavioural therapy, and long-term support, tailored to the unique needs of each
individual. With a focus on community outreach, education, and collaboration with
local stakeholders, DRONE Clinic is poised to make a significant impact on the lives
of those affected by drug abuse in Philadelphia. The clinic anticipates start-up
expenditures of 75 million dollars, operational and development expenses of 25
million dollars, and a monthly income estimate of 1 million dollars. The estimated
timeframe for the establishment of the clinic is 24 months.
2.1 Vision
To create a society free from the devastating consequences of drug abuse, where
individuals can lead healthy, productive lives.
2.2 Mission
2.3 Goal
To significantly reduce the prevalence of drug abuse among teenagers and adults in
Philadelphia, improve the overall health and well-being of our community, and serve
as a model for effective substance abuse treatment nationwide.
2.4 Strategy
In our mission to combat drug abuse in Philadelphia, the DRONE Clinic will employ a
comprehensive approach. Our cutting-edge treatment facility, staffed by skilled
professionals, will provide evidence-based care, including medical treatment and
behavioural therapy. We’ll engage at-risk populations through targeted outreach,
raise awareness, and collaborate with local stakeholders. Funding will come from
private investments, grants, and insurance partnerships, ensuring our sustained
impact on society.
Drug abuse has become a severe public health crisis in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
placing a significant burden on the city's healthcare system, social services, and the
well-being of its residents. In 2020, Philadelphia witnessed 1,214 unintentional drug
overdose deaths, representing a 9% increase from 2018 and a 6% increase from
2019 (Bettigole, 2020). Opioids are the primary culprits, detected in 86% of overdose
fatalities. Fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, is the main driver of these deaths
(Bettigole, 2020; Gulkis, 2022).
Fentanyl proliferation, which is fentanyl often mixed with other drugs, has become
alarmingly prevalent. It was involved in 81% of all drug overdose deaths in 2020
(Bettigole, 2020). Several factors contribute to the high rates of drug abuse in
Philadelphia, including poverty, lack of access to health care, and the
overprescription of opioids (Dasgupta et al., 2018). Socioeconomic disparities play a
significant role, as individuals living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods are more likely
to experience substance use disorders and face barriers to treatment (Singhal et al.,
2016).
Pennsylvania's policies play a crucial role in addressing the drug abuse crisis. The
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) tracks prescription drug dispensing to
prevent misuse and diversion, providing healthcare professionals with real-time data
to make informed decisions and curb opioid overprescribing (Uzuni, 2018). The
Naloxone Distribution Policy prioritizes statewide efforts to distribute naloxone, which
is available without a prescription, empowering community members to reverse
opioid overdoses and save lives (Board of Health and Department of Public Health,
2021).
Efforts to combat this crisis have been multifaceted. The Philadelphia Resilience
Project (2018-2019) focused on critical neighbourhoods, including Kensington, and
involved joint emergency responses across 35 city offices. However, the work
continued through the establishment of the Opioid Response Unit (ORU) in 2019.
The ORU coordinates citywide strategies, targeted interventions, and resource
alignment. Despite these efforts, overdose fatalities persist, disproportionately
affecting communities of colour (Reyes, 2021). The challenge lies in addressing the
complex interplay of opioids, stimulants, and systemic barriers to care, necessitating
ongoing collaboration and innovative solutions (Syed, 2023; Reyes, 2021)
5.0 PROPOSED SOLUTION
The proposed multi-pronged approach, including safe injection sites, expanded MAT
programs, harm reduction strategies, and addressing social determinants of health,
offers a sustainable, feasible, effective, and scalable solution to mitigate drug abuse
in Philadelphia. Safe injection sites have been shown to reduce overdose deaths and
connect individuals to treatment (Veen et al., 2023), while MAT programs have
demonstrated effectiveness in reducing opioid use and improving treatment retention
(Volkow et al., 2014). Harm reduction strategies and addressing social determinants
of health provide a comprehensive, long-term approach to tackling the root causes of
drug abuse (Dasgupta et al., 2018; Hawk et al., 2017).
Stakeholder Role
Using a Gannt chart, the timeline of activities for the establishment of the clinic will
be provided. It is shown in Figure 1 below.
5.3 BUDGET
Figure 2: Budget for Frosh Wellness Clinic
REFERENCES
Dasgupta, N., Beletsky, L., and Ciccarone, D. (2018). Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its
social and economic determinants. American journal of public health, 108(2), 182-
186.
Mars, S. G., Ondocsin, J., and Ciccarone, D. (2018). Toots, tastes and tester shots:
user accounts of drug sampling methods for gauging heroin potency. Harm
Reduction Journal, 15, 1-10.
Singhal, A., Tien, Y. Y., and Hsia, R. Y. (2016). Racial-ethnic disparities in opioid
prescriptions at emergency department visits for conditions commonly associated
with prescription drug abuse. PloS one, 11(8), e0159224.
Behrends, C.N., Paone, D., Nolan, M.L., Tuazon, E., Murphy, S.M., Kapadia, S.N.,
Jeng, P.J., Bayoumi, A.M., Kunins, H.V., and Schackman, B.R. (2019). Estimated
impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in
New York City. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 106, pp.79-88.
Kerr, T., Mitra, S., Kennedy, M.C., and McNeil, R., (2017). Supervised injection
facilities in Canada: past, present, and future. Harm Reduction Journal, 14, pp.1-9.
Volkow, N. D., Frieden, T. R., Hyde, P. S., and Cha, S. S. (2014). Medication-
assisted therapies tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. New England Journal of
Medicine, 370(22), 2063-2066.
Samet, J.H., Botticelli, M., and Bharel, M., (2018). Methadone in primary care—one
small step for Congress, one giant leap for addiction treatment. New England
Journal of Medicine, 379(1), pp. 7-8.
Hawk, M., Coulter, R.W., Egan, J.E., Fisk, S., Reuel Friedman, M., Tula, M., and
Kinsky, S., (2017). Harm reduction principles for healthcare settings. Harm
Reduction Journal, 14, pp.1-9.
Park, J.N., Weir, B.W., Allen, S.T., Chaulk, P., and Sherman, S.G, (2018). Fentanyl-
contaminated drugs and non-fatal overdose among people who inject drugs in
Baltimore, MD. Harm Reduction Journal, 15, pp.1-8.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A Guide to the Project Management
Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management
Institute
Schiller, C., Winters, M., Hanson, H.M., and Ashe, M.C. (2013). A Framework for
Stakeholder Identification in Concept Mapping and Health Research: a Novel
Process and Its Application to Older Adult Mobility and the Built Environment. BMC
Public Health, [online] 13(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-428.