PCBQ019 - Vol A - AS-A-B (Rev 1)

FUGRO
NAVIGATION AND POSITIONING SURVEY SERVICES

RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEY
AS-A-B PLATFORM LOCATION
AL SHAHEEN FIELD, BLOCK 5
STATE OF QATAR
Survey Period: 16 May to 18 May 2016
Fugro Report No.: PCBQ019
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Volume A
Issued as Final
FUGRO
NAVIGATION AND POSITIONING SURVEY SERVICES
RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEY

AS-A-B PLATFORM LOCATION
AL SHAHEEN FIELD, BLOCK 5
STATE OF QATAR
Survey Period: 16 May to 18 May 2016
Report No.: PCBQ019

Volume A: AS-A-B Platform
Prepared for: Maersk Oil Qatar AS

PO Box 22050
Corniche Road
Doha
State of Qatar
Client Reference: MOQ/20/0624/04/16 – Rig Entry Survey AS-A-B
1 Issued as Final B. Pasupathy D. Duguid M. Lomax 9 June 2016
0 Issued for Client Comment B. Pasupathy D. Duguid M. Lomax 8 June 2016
Rev. Description Prepared Checked Approved Date
Document Issue List:
1 Digital Maersk Oil Qatar AS 9 June 2016

1 1 FUGRO 9 June 2016
Revision No. Copy No. Client Name Date of ssue
PO Box 43088, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Tel No. +971 2 5547810, Fax No. +971 2 5547811, http://www.fugro-uae.com
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEY, AS-A-B PLATFORM LOCATION
AL SHAHEEN FIELD, BLOCK 5, STATE OF QATAR
GENERAL LOCATION DIAGRAM
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page i of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS
Metallic and Non-metallic Debris:
The ROV clearance survey observed a total of eighty (80) debris items. Of these, forty-one (41) were
metallic and thirty-nine (39) were non-metallic in nature.
Of the forty-one (41) metallic debris items: twenty-two (22) were recovered to deck; one (1) was
relocated outside the survey area; and five (5) were left in place due to being partially buried or
disintegrated and could not be removed by ROV. Additionally, thirteen (13) metallic items were found
outside the survey limit, while conducting GVI survey of the nearest pipelines/cables, and no action was
taken to recover these.
These remaining metallic items could potentially damage the jack-up rig spudcans and should be
displayed on the navigation screen during the rig move.
No pipelines were detected within the survey corridor.
No action was taken to remove the thirty-nine (39) non-metallic items observed within the survey
corridor.
An illustration highlighting as-left metallic and non-metallic debris is presented below.
Seabed Features:
The combined ROV and bathymetry survey indicated the presence of sixteen (16) spudcan depressions
and three (3) coral outcrops.
Details regarding the debris items and their relocation status are presented in the tables below.
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page ii of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
As-left metallic and non-metallic debris at the AS-A-B Platform survey area
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page iii of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Metallic Debris
Clarke 1880 (modified) Spheroid, Nahrwan 1967 Datum, UTM Projection, Zone 39 N, CM 51° East
Debris As-found Position

Date Time Description Remark
ID Easting [m] Northing [m]
MD01 16/05/2016 02:11 Metallic wire rope 599 833.3 2 941 021.3 Could not be recovered by ROV
MD02 16/05/2016 05:16 Metallic debris with soft rope 599 783.2 2 941 029.8 Relocated to 599 740.1 mE, 2 940 968.2 mN
MD03 16/05/2016 17:45 Metallic paint can 599 743.5 2 941 125.0 Recovered to deck
MD04 16/05/2016 18:40 Old cable 599 694.9 2 941 091.3 Recovered to deck
MD05 16/05/2016 18:58 Metallic round cut 597 717.8 2 941 12 6.2 Recovered to deck
MD06 16/05/2016 18:19 Metallic 599 720.8 2 941 134.5 Recovered to deck
MD07 16/05/2016 19:57 Small metallic 599 665.4 2 941 060.0 Outside survey area
MD08 16/05/2016 20:06 Scaffold pole 599 682.7 2 941 112.4 Recovered to deck
MD09 16/05/2016 23:15 Metallic tubing 599 646.2 2 941 128.2 Recovered to deck
MD10 16/05/2016 23:33 Metallic wire rope with some soft line 599 669.0 2 941 163.2 Partially buried wire rope, not recovered by ROV
MD11 16/05/2016 23:45 Metallic wire rope 599 671.3 2 941 164.3 Partially buried wire rope, not recovered by ROV
MD12 16/05/2016 23:48 Metallic railing 599 675.0 2 941 173.0 Recovered to deck
MD13 17/05/2016 00:00 Metallic bar 599 677.1 2 941 176.9 Recovered to deck
MD14 17/05/2016 00:47 Metallic rod with rubber hose 599 697.8 2 941 215.3 Recovered to deck
MD15 17/05/2016 00:53 Metallic debris - coca cola can 599 689.4 2 941 207.8 Recovered to deck
MD17 17/05/2016 05:45 Scaffold pole with wire rope 599 633.0 2 941 142.2 Recovered to deck
MD19 17/05/2016 06:16 Metallic I-beam 599 673.8 2 941 211.3 Recovered to deck
MD20 17/05/2016 06:22 Scaffold with soft rope 599 673.9 2 941 213.3 Recovered to deck
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page iv of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Metallic Debris

MD22 17/05/2016 07:17 Long metallic pipe under submarine cable 599 628.8 2 941 154.3 Could not be recovered by ROV
MD23 17/05/2016 09:00 Scaffold 599 672.0 2 941 225.2 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD25 17/05/2016 09:27 Scaffold 2 x 599 674.0 2 941 227.8 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD26 17/05/2016 09:27 Grating and scaffold 599 680.6 2 941 230.7 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD27 17/05/2016 09:30 Grating metallic 599 683.3 2 941 230.2 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD28 17/05/2016 09:33 Metallic 599 685.7 2 941 232.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD29 17/05/2016 09:39 Scaffold pole 599 696.7 2 941 236.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD30 17/05/2016 09:46 Fish trap frame 599 698.9 2 941 238.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD31 17/05/2016 09:50 Anodes partially damage 599 712.2 2 941 230.1 As-found damage on the anode
MD32 17/05/2016 09:52 Soft line tied to pipeline 599 713.3 2 941 229.6 As-found soft rope with pipeline
MD35 18/05/2016 01:19 Scaffold 599 644.3 2 941 125.8 Recovered to deck
MD36 18/05/2016 01:48 Metallic debris 599 647.5 2 941 137.3 Recovered to deck
MD38 18/05/2016 04:23 Metallic coupling 599 636.8 2 941 138.4 Recovered to deck
MD40 18/05/2016 06:53 Metallic ring 599 650.4 2 941 181.6 Recovered to deck
MD41 18/05/2016 07:07 Fish trap 599 647.7 2 941 184.4 Could not be recovered by ROV
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page v of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Non-Metallic Debris

ND01 16/05/2016 03:02 Soft rope 599 809.7 2940 997.6 No action
ND02 16/05/2016 04:20 Rubber 599 780.5 2 941 004.7 No action
ND03 16/05/2016 04:31 Soft rope 599 804.3 2 941 044.2 No action
ND05 16/05/2016 08:07 Non-metallic debris canvas 599 800.4 2 941 127.4 No action
ND06 16/05/2016 08:13 Large piece of canvas 599 798.7 2 941 121.1 No action
ND09 16/05/2016 09:12 Fishing line with anchor block 599 793.9 2 941 131.2 No action
ND10 16/05/2016 09:26 Bunch of soft rope 599 787.0 2 941 136.4 No action
ND11 16/05/2016 09:43 Rubber hose 599 722.0 2 941 046.4 No action
ND12 16/05/2016 09:28 Canvas 599 713.9 2 941 050.1 No action
ND13 16/05/2016 16:55 Bundle of soft line 599 774.0 2 941 139.2 No action
ND14 16/05/2016 17:51 Soft line crossing 599 749.6 2 941 139.8 No action
ND15 16/05/2016 18:48 Small soft line 599 708.2 2 941 112.6 No action
ND16 16/05/2016 19:28 Soft line 599 744.8 2 941 159.6 No action
ND18 16/05/2016 20:41 Length of soft line 599 717.0 2 941 179.3 No action
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page vi of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Non-Metallic Debris

ND21 16/05/2016 21:48 Plastic 599 664.2 2 941 119.9 No action
ND23 16/05/2016 22:24 Small piece of concrete block 599 719.1 2 941 198.0 No action
ND25 16/05/2016 22:41 Soft debris 599 702.0 2 941 198.2 No action
ND26 16/05/2016 22:45 Grout bag remnant 599 702.9 2 941 195.7 No action
ND27 16/05/2016 22:51 Piece of rope 599 690.5 2 941 172.8 No action
ND29 17/05/2016 00:10 Wood or fibre glass 599 688.8 2 941 191.8 No action
ND34 17/05/2016 05:56 Tire/Fender 599 648.9 2 941 164.4 No action
ND35 17/05/2016 06:00 Soft debris / Canvas 599 652.1 2 941 169.2 No action
ND38 17/05/2016 06:58 Non-metallic debris 599 648.8 2 941 183.1 No action
XX01 16/05/2016 20:20 Linear object / Rubber 599 716.8 2 941 159.6 No action
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page vii of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
CONTENTS
GENERAL LOCATION DIAGRAM 1
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS II
1 INTRODUCTION 1
General 1
Scope of Work 1
Survey Design 2
Survey Line Plan 2
Tolerances 2
Reference Documents 3
SURVEY PARAMETERS 5
Units 5
Geodetic Parameters 5
Test Computation 6
Vertical Control 6
Time 6
SURVEY VESSEL, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL 7

Survey Vessel 7
Equipment 7
Equipment Configuration 8
Positioning System 8
Navigation System and Data Logging - General 8
Subsurface Positioning System 9
Valeport CTD System 9
Equipment Performance and Data Quality 9
Personnel 9
SURVEY OPERATIONS 10
Rig Entry and Debris Clearance Survey at AS-A-B Platform 10
Vessel Offsets 10
MV Allianz Zeus 10
ROV Panther XT 965 11
Position System Verification 14
Gyrocompass Calibration 15
ROV Octans Gyrocompass Alignment Check 15
Octans Pitch and Roll Sign Convention 16
Sound Velocity Profiles 16
GAPS USBL Position Verification 16
Multibeam Calibration 18
HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT 19

Incident Reports 19
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page viii of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Shift Handovers 19
DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION 20

Data Processing 20
Navigation and Positioning 20
Interpretation Method 20
CHARTING 21
SURVEY RESULTS 22
Metallic and Non-metallic Debris 22
Seabed Features 28
ROV Still Images of As-left and Relocated Metallic Debris 30
APPENDICES
A. DAILY PROGRESS REPORTS
B. CALIBRATIONS AND VERIFICATIONS

B.1 DGPS VERIFICATION
B.2 GYROCOMPASS CALIBRATION
B.3 SOUND VELOCITY PROFILES
B.4 GAPS VERIFICATION
B.5 MULTIBEAM ECHO SOUNDER CALIBRATION
B.6 MOBILISATION REPORT
C. TIDAL DATA
D. EQUIPMENT
D.1 EQUIPMENT LISTING
D.2 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT DIAGRAM
E. CHARTS
F. SERVICE WARRANTY
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page ix of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
TABLES IN THE MAIN TEXT
Table 1.1: Survey Area - AS-A-B Platform 2

Table 1.2: Survey Tolerances 2
Table 1.3: Document References 3
Table 2.1: Project Geodetic and Projection Parameters 5
Table 2.2: Test Computation 6
Table 3.1: Vessel Specifications – MV Allianz Zeus 7
Table 3.2: Equipment List - MV Allianz Zeus 7
Table 3.3: StarPack Receiver Settings 8
Table 3.4: Survey Personnel 9
Table 4.1: Vessel Offsets – MV Allianz Zeus 11
Table 4.2: Vessel Offsets - Panther XT 965 Offsets 11
Table 4.3: Results of Positioning Systems Verifications 14
Table 4.5: Results of Offset Verifications 14
Table 4.6: Results of Gyrocompass Calibration 15
Table 4.7: Results of Octans Gyrocompass Calibration 15
Table 4.8: Acoustic Velocity Profiles at AS-A-B 16
Table 4.9: USBL Positioning Verification - NNE Disposal Well 16
Table 4.10: Results of the Position Verification at NNE Well Head 17
Table 4.11: Multibeam Echo Sounder Calibration Result - MV Allianz Zeus 18
Table 6.1: Data Processing Software 20
Table 8.1: AS-A-B Platform Site: As-found Positions of Metallic Debris 23
Table 8.2: AS-A-B Platform Site: Relocated Position of Metallic Debris 25
Table 8.3: AS-A-B Platform Site: As-found Positions of Non-metallic Debris 25
Table 8.4: Details of Spudcan Depressions within the Survey Area 28
Table 8.5: Details of Coral Outcrops within the Survey Area 28
FIGURES IN THE MAIN TEXT
Figure 1.1: Survey runline diagram - AS-A-B Platform 4

Figure 2.1: Result of test coordinate computation 6
Figure 4.1: Offset diagram - MV Allianz Zeus 12
Figure 4.2: Offset diagram - ROV Panther XT 965 13
Figure 4.3: Results and intersection of GAPS fixes at the NNE well head location 17
Figure 8.1: Multibeam data image of the AS-A-B platform site 29
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page x of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
IMAGES IN THE MAIN TEXT
Image 8.1: MD01 metallic wire rope – could not be recovered by ROV 30
Image 8.2: MD02 metallic debris – Relocated outside survey area 30
Image 8.3: MD10 metallic rope – could not be recovered by ROV 31
Image 8.4: MD11 metallic rope – could not be recovered by ROV 31
Image 8.5: MD22 metallic pipe – could not be recovered by ROV 32
Image 8.6: MD41 fish trap – could not be recovered by ROV 32
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page xi of xi

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
1 INTRODUCTION
General
Fugro was contracted by Maersk Oil Qatar AS (MOQ) (Client) to provide positioning and navigation
survey services for Rig Entry and Debris Clearance surveys onboard the MV Allianz Zeus and the client
supplied Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Panther XT 965, in the Al Shaheen Field, Block 5, offshore
the State of Qatar.
During this deployment, the project scope was summarised as below:
 ‘Rowan California’ jack-up drilling rig entry and debris clearance surveys at AS-A-B Platform;
see MOQ scope of work MOQ/20/0624/04/16.
The ROV debris clearance survey at AS-A-B Platform site was conducted using a Client supplied ROV
Panther XT 965 and a Reson SeaBat 7125 multibeam swath bathymetry echo sounder in conjunction
with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The ROV system was interfaced to a Client
supplied GAPS USBL system for sub-surface positioning.
This document details the survey results of the ROV survey carried out between 16 and 18 May 2016,
at the AS-A-B Platform site.
All positioning and survey related works were carried out in accordance with the Client's specifications
and Fugro’s standing Survey Work Practices.
NOTE: All coordinates listed in this document are based on the World Geodetic System 1984, Clarke 1880
(modified) Spheroid, Nahrwan 1967 (New Decca 1975) Datum, Universal Transverse Mercator Projection,
Zone 39 N, Central Meridian 51° East. Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) will be considered as the vertical datum
throughout the report.
The Service Warranty in Appendix F outlines the limitations of this report.
Scope of Work
With reference to the client’s requirements, the survey scope of work at the AS-A-B Platform location
could be summarised as follows:
 To identify, assess and report all hazards, debris or other hard / metallic objects that could cause
damage to the jack-up rig spudcans;
 All metallic debris is considered hazardous, including scaffold pipes (horizontal & vertical);
 All hazardous debris shall be recovered to the surface or moved to a client appointed safe location.
All relocated debris are to be well documented with position and still images;
 Any debris unable to be removed or relocated shall be well documented with position, size and still
images;
 Seabed and spudcan depressions shall be recorded with position, approximate diameter and depth;
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page 1 of 32

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
 To perform an ROV GVI of existing pipelines and cables within the defined survey area (where
applicable);
 To record MBES bathymetric data across the extent of the defined survey area;
Survey Design
The survey extents, demarcating the limits of the AS-A-B Platform location, are presented in the table
below:
Table 1.1: Survey Area - AS-A-B Platform

Point Easting [m] Northing [m] Latitude (N) Longitude (E)
A 599 625.0 2 941 153.0 26° 35’ 23.240” 052° 00’ 01.679”
B 599 668.0 2 941 215.0 26° 35’ 25.245” 052° 00’ 03.251”
C 599 704.0 2 941 224.0 26° 35’ 25.528” 052° 00’ 04.555”
D 599 890.0 2 941 096.0 26° 35’ 21.320” 052° 00’ 11.242”
E 599 805.0 2 941 972.0 26° 35’ 49.814” 052° 00’ 08.418”
F 599 642.0 2 941 084.0 26° 35’ 20.274” 052° 00’ 02.274”
Source: SOW MOQ/20/0624/04/16 & Drawing No: ASABY-20-062415-1100 Rev A
Survey Line Plan
The survey area defined by the boundary coordinates in Table 1.1 was 250 m in length and 150 m in
width. Survey lines were run parallel to the face of the AS-A-B Platform with a 10 m spacing between
each survey line. A total of twenty-five (25) survey lines were run.
The ROV was used on all the survey lines and MBES was used on selected lines to achieve full data
coverage.
A survey line plan diagram is presented below in Figure 1.1.
Tolerances
The objective of the project is to provide positioning and navigational services for the debris clearance
survey within the client-specified position tolerances:
Table 1.2: Survey Tolerances

Survey Tolerances
Item Source Accuracy
Surface G2/XP < +/- 0.25 m
Positioning
Subsea USBL < +/- 2.00 m
Depth Depth MBES < +/- 0.10 m
Heading Surface Gyrocompass < 0.1º

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Reference Documents
The following documents were referenced while compiling this report:
Table 1.3: Document References

No. Document Name Document Identity
1 Contract Documentation
2 Sun Azimuth Tables See FSME Offshore Pack
3 Fugro Survey Work Practices – Reporting FSME 820.17
4 Fugro Survey Work Practices – Offset Measurements FSME 820.24
5 Fugro Survey Work Practices – Tidal Reduction FSME 820.35
6 Geo Report Test Transformation MOQ SS-10-02-00 Rev 5.1
7 MOQ Tidal Constituents MOQ Document
8 MOQ Scope of Work AS-A-B MOQ/20/0624/04/16
9 MOQ Drawing ASABY-20-062415-1100 Rev A
10 FSME Reports PCBQ004, PCBQ008 & PCBQ001 Reports
11 MOQ Tidal Predictions 2016

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 1.1: Survey runline diagram - AS-A-B Platform

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
SURVEY PARAMETERS
Units
 Coordinates are expressed in International metres [m]
 Linear measurements are expressed in metres [m]
 Angular units are expressed in degrees (°)
Geodetic Parameters
The following geodetic parameters were used for conducting the survey:
Table 2.1: Project Geodetic and Projection Parameters

Global Positioning System Geodetic Parameters 1
Spheroid: World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) ITRF 2008 Current Epoch
Datum: World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) ITRF 2008 Current Epoch
Semi-major Axis: a = 6 378 137.000 m
Inverse Flattening: 1/f = 298.257 223 563
Local Datum Geodetic Parameters 2
Spheroid: Clarke 1880 (Modified)

Datum: Nahrwan (1967) (New Decca 1975 Datum)
Semi-major Axis: a = 6378249.148 m
Inverse Flattening: 1/f = 293.465
Datum Transformation Parameters from WGS84 to Nahrwan (1967) 3
Shift dX: +250.20 m Rotation rX: 0.00 arcsec Scale Factor: 0.00 ppm
Shift dY: +153.09 m Rotation rY: 0.00 arcsec
Shift dZ: -391.70 m Rotation rZ: 0.00 arcsec
Local Projection Parameters
Map Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator, Northern Hemisphere

Grid System: UTM Zone 39 N
Central Meridian: 51° 00’ 00” East
Latitude of Origin: 0° 00’ 00” North
False Easting: 500 000 m
False Northing: 0m
Scale Factor on Central Meridian: 0.9996
Units: Metre
Notes:
1. Fugro Starfix navigation software always uses WGS84 geodetic parameters as a primary datum for
any geodetic calculations.
2. Source: MOQ Survey Standard SS-10-02-00. Rev5.1
3. This is the right-handed coordinate frame rotation convention used by the Fugro Starfix navigation
software.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Test Computation
Prior to survey operations, the test coordinate was converted from WGS84 to Local Datum to verify the
correct geodesy settings in the Starfix.Seis Navigation system. The result of the computation is
presented below in Table 2.2 and Figure 2.1.
Table 2.2: Test Computation

Geodetic System WGS84 Nahrwan
Latitude 26° 33' 26.779" N 26° 33' 20.470" N
Longitude 51° 58’ 04.162" E 51° 58' 00.450" E
Spheroidal Height -18.17 m 10.000 m
Easting UTM 596 398.53 m 596 300.03 m
Northing UTM 2 937 783.07 m 2 937 350.15 m
Refer to MOQ SS-10-02-00 Rev 5.1.pdf
Figure 2.1: Result of test coordinate computation
Vertical Control
The vertical reference datum during the survey was that as defined by Maersk Oil Qatar AS for the
Al Shaheen Field. Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) by the simplified harmonic method of tidal prediction
was used.
All post-survey vertical references within this report are reduced to Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT)
using Actual Tidal Data supplied by MOQ.
Time
All survey data were logged in UTC. Local time is UTC +3 hours.
Times displayed in the video images of this report are shown in local time.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
SURVEY VESSEL, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL
Survey Vessel
The ROV inspection survey was conducted from the Client chartered vessel MV Allianz Zeus. The
vessel specifications are summarised as follows:
Table 3.1: Vessel Specifications – MV Allianz Zeus

MV Allianz Zeus
Name of Operator Allianz Marine
Length Overall 65.0 m
Summer Draught 5.00 m
Gross Registered Tonnage Gross 2950T / Net 885T
Built Year 2013, China
Accommodation 50 person
Registered Singapore
Type DP-Class 2
Source: www.allianzmarine.com
Equipment
The following survey equipment was used during survey operations:
Table 3.2: Equipment List - MV Allianz Zeus

Positioning Systems
2x Starfix.G2 DGNSS receiver
2x GPS Antenna Array
1x Trimble Quickplan or equivalent software
Navigation and Data Logging System
2x PC Computer with UPS
2x Starfix.Seis software
2x Positioning and sensor interfaces
1x Printer / Scanner
3x External Video Display Unit - Helmsman
2x Survey grade gyrocompass
2x UPS power supply
Other Items
1x Reporting PC with AutoCAD
1x Trimble 4700/5800 For Static GPS observations (Mobilisation only)
1x Seatex 5 MRU
2x CTDS probe
1x Total Stations and ancillary equipment for calibrations

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Client Supplied Equipment

Client Supplied IXSEA GAPS USBL with 4 Beacons
SeaBat 7125 Multibeam Echo Sounder system
Seaeye Panther XT 965 ROV system with:
5-function manipulator
Depth sensor
Altimeter
IXSea Octans Ti 1000 Submersible Gyrocompass & Motion sensor
Equipment Configuration
Positioning System
Dual Fugro StarPack GNSS receivers were supplied for the duration of the project with the Starfix.G2
service being the primary service and the secondary service taking signals from Fugro XP/HP services.
Fugro StarPack receivers used the following settings:
Table 3.3: StarPack Receiver Settings

Receiver Settings
Update rate 5 s Max 10 s
Minimum elevation mask 15 degrees
Position dilution of precision (PDOP) 5 maximum
Number of satellites 6 minimum
Data latency < 30 sec
Prior to the survey operations, all GNSS systems were verified, the results of which are described in
Appendix B.2.
Navigation System and Data Logging - General

The Fugro Starfix navigation suite was run on Windows based operating system computers, driving a
remote ‘helmsman’ monitor.
The navigation computer received corrected GNSS-derived latitude and longitude from the StarPack
mobile receivers. The antenna position was then converted into local UTM coordinates by the Starfix
software. Navigation was conducted with no smoothing applied to the position computation. The CRP
position of the vessel was derived using total station measurements of the vessel, all measurements
were relative to the main deck level. This was located on the vessel’s centreline and just aft of the USBL
pole and MBES pole. Offsets were measured from the CRP to the GNSS antennae and to the USBL
GAPS transducer. The survey gyrocompass, interfaced to the navigation computer, was aligned to the
vessel’s centreline and calibrated by Total Station observations made to prisms placed at the bow and
stern of the vessel. This provided the navigation computer with real time orientation and as a result, the
selected offset position coordinates were continuously computed.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Navigation data were logged via the Starfix.Logging module in SPL and NEL (Fugro Standard Format).
Logging started and stopped for each significant event requiring positioning. This included a set of data
logged to define a survey runline. Where the ‘significant event’ was a point position, such as when
logging data for position verification over a known point, further review of the data was undertaken.
Subsurface Positioning System

The MV Allianz Zeus was equipped with a Client-supplied Global Acoustic Positioning System (GAPS),
an Ultra Short Base Line (USBL) system interfaced to the online survey computer. The transducer of
the GAPS was mounted in the moon pool of the vessel.
GAPS is a self-calibrating, portable USBL system with integrated Inertial Navigation System (INS).
Received offsets (X, Y and Z) to the transponder mounted position on the ROV, with measurements to
a common reference point on the vehicle, derived an absolute position of the ROV at any particular
instance.
Valeport CTD System

A Valeport 602 CTD system was used to determine the speed of sound in the survey area and for input
into the Main Machine Interface software for subsea positioning system (GAPS).
The mean water density value was computed from recorded data using the Valeport 602 CTD probe.
Equipment Performance and Data Quality

The survey equipment performed well during the survey period and the data quality was good for
intended purposes.
Personnel
The following personnel were involved in the project:
Table 3.4: Survey Personnel

Personnel Name Function Period
Offshore B. Pasupathy Party Chief / Engineer Duration
Offshore Mateo Rana Senior Surveyor Duration
Offshore Erminio Sagayaga Senior Surveyor Duration
Onshore Mike Lomax Project Manager Duration

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
SURVEY OPERATIONS
Rig Entry and Debris Clearance Survey at AS-A-B Platform
The vessel navigation system, multibeam echo sounder, GAPS USBL system and ROV systems were
mobilised in Ras Laffan Port, Qatar, between 8 and 15 May 2016. The establishment of two (2) new
control stations and all necessary port calibrations were conducted during these period, whilst the vessel
was alongside Berth 8 in the port.
The following functional tests and calibrations were also conducted between 9 and 15 May 2016.
 Offset measurements of the Vessel and the ROV;
 Gyrocompass alignment check;
 DGPS positioning verification;
 CTD system wet test;
 Online configuration check;
 ROV Octans alignment check.
Upon entry to the field, prior to conducting survey operations, the following tests were carried out for
infield system verifications:
 CTD cast was conducted on 16 May 2016 at NNE location;
 GAPS USBL verification was conducted on 16 May 2016 at NNE well head;
 Multibeam Echo Sounder calibration was conducted on 17 May 2016, in Al Shaheen Field
Prior to sailing to the survey area, a printout of the geodetic parameters, as set up in the navigation
computer system, was forwarded to the Fugro office for the attention of the Project Manager and Survey
Manager for review and confirmation. A printout of the Starfix.Seis configuration file was also forwarded
to the office for confirmation.
All coordinates supplied to the vessel were cross-checked by the survey crew (coordinate
transformation) and were signed off by the Party Chief and Client Representative.
Vessel Offsets
MV Allianz Zeus
All offset measurements onboard the vessel MV Allianz Zeus were taken relative to the CRP and derived
in an X, Y and Z coordinate system relative to the CRP, defined as 0.00, 0.00 and 0.00. The Z value of
the CRP at main deck level was considered as Zero (0.00).

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
The CRP was physically defined on the main deck level of the vessel’s centreline just aft of the MBES
and GAPS poles. All measurements are quoted in meters. The accepted set of offsets for the project
are shown in the table below:
Table 4.1: Vessel Offsets – MV Allianz Zeus

Offset X [m] Y [m] Z [m]
COG/CRP 0.000 0.000 0.000
GPS_Port -4.355 12.502 16.396
GPS Stbd 4.513 12.493 16.396
Stern 0.000 -32.512 0.000
GAPS USBL 3.107 1.482 -7.342
CRANE 1 -5.176 -16.492 0.000
CRANE 2 2.874 5.664 5.700
MBES -1.667 1.459 -6.492
SEATEX MRU -1.667 1.569 -1.022
ROV Launch -8.000 -6.375 0.000
A vessel offset diagram is provided in Figure 4.1.
ROV Panther XT 965

A measuring tape was used to measure and cross-check the offsets of the ROV sensor locations. The
following offsets were used in the Starfix.Seis navigation software module; using a similar relative
coordinates system as that described for the vessel.
Table 4.2: Vessel Offsets - Panther XT 965 Offsets

CRP / Focal Point 0.000 0.000 0.000
Beacon Aft 0.000 -2.390 1.200
Altimeter-1 0.360 -1.830 0.200
Altimeter-2 0.360 -1.930 0.200
Camera Port -0.115 -0.350 0.700
Camera Stbd 0.115 -0.350 0.700
Octans 0.000 -2.080 0.300
Depth Sensor -0.410 -1.490 0.250
An offset diagram for the ROV is provided in Figure 4.2.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.1: Offset diagram - MV Allianz Zeus

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.2: Offset diagram - ROV Panther XT 965

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Position System Verification
Whilst mobilising at Ras Laffan Port in Qatar, GNSS health checks were conducted using a Total Station
system to observe prism targets on the GNSS antenna. The GNSS positioning system verification was
undertaken between 06:40 and 07:40 on 14 May 2016. In this method, both the GNSS Port and GNSS
Starboard antenna positions were verified.
On 25 May 2016, further vessel offset verifications were conducted using a Total Station system to
observe prism targets on the MBES pole and GAPS pole. The results of the offset verifications are
tabulated below:
The following tables summarise the results of the Starfix.G2 GNSS, Starfix.XP GPS and offset positions
that were verified against the control stations established in Ras Laffan Port.
Table 4.3: Results of Positioning Systems Verifications

Calculated Antenna Position Observed DGPS Position
GPS
Easting [m] Northing [m] Easting [m] Northing [m]
Port Antenna (G2) 559 716.68 2 866 766.62 559 716.56 2 866 766.57
Stbd Antenna (G2) 559 721.89 2 866 759.45 559 721.77 2 866 759.36
Port Antenna (XP) 559 716.68 2 866 766.62 559 716.52 2 866 766.57
Stbd Antenna (XP) 559 721.89 2 866 759.45 559 721.79 2 866 759.37

GPS Δ Easting [m] Δ Northing [m] SD Easting SD Northing
Port Antenna (G2) 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.02

Stbd Antenna (G2) 0.12 0.09 0.02 0.02
Port Antenna (XP) 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.02
Stbd Antenna (XP) 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.02
Table 4.5: Results of Offset Verifications

Survey Pole Δ Easting [m] Δ Northing [m] SD Easting SD Northing
MBES 0.14 -0.09 0.02 0.04

USBL (GAPS) 0.08 -0.09 0.02 0.05
Positioning system verification results are included in Appendix B.1 - DGPS Verification

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Gyrocompass Calibration
Two (2) TSS Meridian Surveyor gyrocompasses were installed on the bridge of MV Allianz Zeus to
provide a heading reference for the survey system. The gyrocompasses were secured to the deck under
the survey desk. They were labelled Port Gyro-1 and Starboard Gyro-2, and are referred to as such in
the Starfix.Seis online system. The interface cables from the gyrocompasses were also labelled to avoid
any confusion.
Port Gyro-1 : Meridian Surveyor (S/N 2698)
Starboard Gyro-2 : Meridian Surveyor (S/N 8153)
For the duration of the calibration, the gyrocompass latitude was set to correspond with the calibration
position (26º North) and the gyrocompass speed was set to zero.
Gyrocompass alignment was measured, with the vessel on one heading, by determining the bearing of
the ship’s centreline, whilst the vessel was moored alongside Berth 8 in Ras Laffan Port, Qatar.
Total Station observations were undertaken between 06:40 and 07:40 on 14 May 2016. Heading data
from both gyrocompasses were simultaneously logged in Starfix.Seis during this period.
The alignment corrections, as shown in the Table 4.4 below, were derived as the mean difference
between the true vessel heading and the gyrocompass observations. The final mean corrections applied
to the gyrocompasses were -0.79°T for the Port gyro and 0.18°T for the Starboard gyro.
All alignment correction factors were approved by Fugro prior to start of survey works.
Table 4.6: Results of Gyrocompass Calibration

Gyro C-O (°) SD
Port Gyro-1 -0.79 0.06
Stbd Gyro-2 0.18 0.06
Gyrocompass alignment results are included in Appendix B.2 - Gyro Calibration.
ROV Octans Gyrocompass Alignment Check
On 15 May 2016, the ROV Octans gyrocompass alignment check was performed while the vessel was
alongside Berth 8 in Ras Laffan Port. The Octans Gyro was mounted on the ROV in its defined location
and the misalignment between the LARS and the ROV was calculated. Data from the vessel and ROV
gyrocompasses were logged simultaneously for one hour to derive the C-O. The calculated C-O for the
ROV gyrocompass is presented below:
Table 4.7: Results of Octans Gyrocompass Calibration

Observations
Gyrocompass Type Vessel Gyro Heading ROV Gyro Heading C-O SD
Octans Gyro 143.47 233.51 0.76 0.02

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Detailed calibration results are included in the Appendix B.2 - Gyro Cal
Octans Pitch and Roll Sign Convention
A check was performed to ensure that the Octans sign convention corresponded to that required by the
Fugro Starfix.Seis navigation software.
To verify the sign convention, the ROV was tilted stern upwards by placing a wedge under the aft of the
ROV and the “Pitch“ reading was observed and the convention confirmed. The wedge was then placed
under the port side of the ROV and the “Roll“ reading was observed and the convention confirmed.
The Octans gyrocompass was configured to output positive pitch when the bow is up and positive roll
when the port is up.
Sound Velocity Profiles
During the survey period at AS-A-B Platform, two TSDIPs were performed using the Valeport CTD probe
and the resulting sound velocity values was entered into the GAPS software. The table below
summarises the results of each TSDIP.
Table 4.8: Acoustic Velocity Profiles at AS-A-B

Maximum Water Average Speed
Date Time (UTC) Easting [m] Northing [m]
Depth [m] of Sound (m/s)
16-05-2016 01:37 599 817.9 2 490 957.5 61.2 1537.89
17-05-2016 10:52 599 848.0 2 941 039.2 63.0 1536.76
Sound velocity profiling results can be found in Appendix B.3– TSDIPs.
GAPS USBL Position Verification
The ROV was deployed at the NNE well head on 16 May 2016 and mean fixes taken of the vehicle CRP
reference point on four of the quadrants of the well head in both clockwise and anticlockwise directions.
ROV positions were derived from the GAPS beacon. All four mean position fixes derived were
intersected to derive a position 1.03 m at a bearing of 224.22° G from the Client-supplied position of the
well head.
Table 4.9: USBL Positioning Verification - NNE Disposal Well

Point Latitude (N) Longitude (E) Easting [m] Northing [m]
NNE Disposal Well 26°36’34.26” 52°01’00.27” 601 228.32 2 943 350.81
Source: MOQ Provided for PCBQ019 Procedure.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
The results of the position verification at NNE disposal well head are presented below:
Table 4.10: Results of the Position Verification at NNE Well Head

ROV Fix ROV Fix Mean ROV Fix Mean ROV Fix Delta E Delta N
Fix Direction
Easting [m] Northing [m] Easting [m] Northing [m] [m] [m]
Clockwise 601 228.9 2 943 351.3 601 228.32 2 943 350.81 0.61 0.48
Counter-clockwise 601 229.2 2 943 351.8 601 228.32 2 943 350.81 0.83 1.01
Mean 601 229.0 2 943 351.6 601 228.32 2 943 350.81 0.72 0.74
Detailed position results are included in Appendix B.4 – GAPS Verification
Figure 4.3: Results and intersection of GAPS fixes at the NNE well head location

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Multibeam Calibration
On 17 May 2016, the Reson SeaBat 7125 multibeam echo sounder onboard the MV Allianz Zeus was
calibrated over the 32″ Ras Gas Export pipeline from RG-A to Ras Laffan, Al Shaheen Field. The purpose
of calibration was to determine the angular differences between the pitch, roll and heading sensors of
the multibeam head installation, and the time delay (latency) in the positioning system.
A motion sensor located close to the multibeam head was used to evaluate, in real time, the motion of
the vessel and correct the multibeam echo sounder dataset. This ensured seamless multibeam
bathymetric data. A Seatex 5 MRU was used as the primary motion sensor during the calibration
procedure and throughout the survey period.
The following table shows the results of the calibration and the values entered to ensure a consistent
multibeam echo sounder dataset. These values are not considered excessive and were taken into
account throughout the data acquisition period.
A summary of the calibration result is provided in the table below:
Table 4.11: Multibeam Echo Sounder Calibration Result - MV Allianz Zeus

Pitch Error Roll Error Heading Error
Date Motion Sensor Latency (s)
(°) (°) (°)
17 May 2016 Seatex 5 MRU 0.00 -0.20 -0.85 0.50
A detailed report of the multibeam calibration is included in Appendix B.5.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT
The MOQ Client Representative took responsibility for all health and safety matters relating to survey
safety, although ALL personnel had a duty to perform tasks in a safe and appropriate manner. Safety
issues were discussed during the morning meetings on the vessel. All personnel joining the vessel
undertook a vessel induction tour.
All field personnel were instructed to wear appropriate PPE and to follow the 500 m safety zone
regulation at all times when involved in back deck survey operations. The ROV shift supervisors
conducted daily toolbox meetings with ROV and survey personnel and a Risk Assessment for the back
deck operations, particularly for the deployment and recovery of ROV, was completed.
All personnel including Fugro survey crew wore appropriate PPE at all times when involved in back deck
operations.
Incident Reports
No HSE incidents occurred during the survey operations. Toolbox and Safety Meetings were conducted
before commencing any operations.
Shift Handovers
There were two shift changes per day and there was a shift handover conducted at each shift change.
The shift handovers included the tasks completed during the shift and the proposed tasks and planning
for the next shift. Any other important details were also included in the shift handover notes.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION
Data Processing
All data were logged in Fugro Binary Format (FBF) and processed using the Starfix suite of software.
Heading, motion and position data were processed and checked to ensure good data quality.
Starfix.Proc was used for the automated and manual processing of Starfix.Logging data sets.
Table 6.1: Data Processing Software

System FSME Software
Bathymetry (MBES) Starfix.Proc
Navigation and Positioning
The measured offsets for all of the offset points were entered into the navigation system and processed
using Starfix.Proc to enable track charts to be plotted and ‘corrected’ navigation files to be integrated
with other sensor data at a later stage. These included:
 GPS absolute position of the primary positioning system;
 Common Reference Point;
 Multibeam Echo Sounder.
All ROV positions were derived by computing the mean of ten (10) position updates.
Interpretation Method
Seabed features such as spudcan depressions, seabed scars, depressions and disturbed sediments
were interpreted from the multibeam dataset acquired using the SeaBat 7125 multibeam echo sounder
operating at 400 kHz. The interpretation was correlated with the logged features in ROV survey, where
visible.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
CHARTING
The charts are based on the Clarke 1880 (modified) Spheroid, Nahrwan (1967) Datum, Universal
Transverse Mercator Projection (UTM), Zone 39 North, Central Meridian 57° East.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
SURVEY RESULTS
The ROV debris clearance and the multibeam swath bathymetry survey at the AS-A-B rig entry location
was conducted between 16 and 18 May 2016, and the results are presented below.
Metallic and Non-metallic Debris
A total of eighty (80) items of debris were found during the ROV survey. Of these, forty-one (41) were
metallic and thirty-nine (39) were non-metallic in nature. Most of the metallic items were recovered or
relocated outside the survey area.
Of the forty-one (41) metallic debris items: twenty-two (22) were recovered to deck; one (1) was
relocated outside the survey area; and five (5) were left in place due to being partially buried or
disintegrated and could not be removed by ROV. Additionally, thirteen (13) metallic items were found
outside the survey limit, while conducting GVI survey of the nearest pipelines/cables, and no action was
taken to recover these
These remaining metallic debris items could potentially damage the jack-up rig spudcans and should be
displayed on the navigation screen during the rig move.
No pipelines were detected within the survey corridor.
No action was taken to remove the thirty-nine (39) non-metallic items observed within the survey
corridor.
The details of the metallic and non-metallic debris items are presented in Table 8.1, Table 8.2 and Table
8.3 below.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Table 8.1: AS-A-B Platform Site: As-found Positions of Metallic Debris

Metallic Debris

MD01 16/05/2016 02:11 Metallic wire rope 599 833.3 2 941 021.3 Could not be recovered by ROV
MD02 16/05/2016 05:16 Metallic debris with soft rope 599 783.2 2 941 029.8 Relocated to 599 740.1 mE, 2 940 968.2 mN
MD03 16/05/2016 17:45 Metallic paint can 599 743.5 2 941 125.0 Recovered to deck
MD04 16/05/2016 18:40 Old cable 599 694.9 2 941 091.3 Recovered to deck
MD05 16/05/2016 18:58 Metallic round cut 597 717.8 2 941 12 6.2 Recovered to deck
MD06 16/05/2016 18:19 Metallic 599 720.8 2 941 134.5 Recovered to deck
MD07 16/05/2016 19:57 Small metallic 599 665.4 2 941 060.0 Outside survey area
MD09 16/05/2016 23:15 Metallic tubing 599 646.2 2 941 128.2 Recovered to deck
MD10 16/05/2016 23:33 Metallic wire rope with some soft line 599 669.0 2 941 163.2 Partially buried wire rope, not recovered by ROV
MD11 16/05/2016 23:45 Metallic wire rope 599 671.3 2 941 164.3 Partially buried wire rope, not recovered by ROV
MD12 16/05/2016 23:48 Metallic railing 599 675.0 2 941 173.0 Recovered to deck
MD14 17/05/2016 00:47 Metallic rod with rubber hose 599 697.8 2 941 215.3 Recovered to deck
MD15 17/05/2016 00:53 Metallic debris - coca cola can 599 689.4 2 941 207.8 Recovered to deck
MD17 17/05/2016 05:45 Scaffold pole with wire rope 599 633.0 2 941 142.2 Recovered to deck
MD19 17/05/2016 06:16 Metallic I-beam 599 673.8 2 941 211.3 Recovered to deck
MD20 17/05/2016 06:22 Scaffold with soft rope 599 673.9 2 941 213.3 Recovered to deck

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Metallic Debris

MD22 17/05/2016 07:17 Long metallic pipe under submarine cable 599 628.8 2 941 154.3 Could not be recovered by ROV
MD25 17/05/2016 09:27 Scaffold 2 x 599 674.0 2 941 227.8 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD26 17/05/2016 09:27 Grating and scaffold 599 680.6 2 941 230.7 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD27 17/05/2016 09:30 Grating metallic 599 683.3 2 941 230.2 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD28 17/05/2016 09:33 Metallic 599 685.7 2 941 232.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD29 17/05/2016 09:39 Scaffold pole 599 696.7 2 941 236.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD30 17/05/2016 09:46 Fish trap frame 599 698.9 2 941 238.6 No action, as-found outside survey limit
MD32 17/05/2016 09:52 Soft line tied to pipeline 599 713.3 2 941 229.6 As-found soft rope with pipeline
MD35 18/05/2016 01:19 Scaffold 599 644.3 2 941 125.8 Recovered to deck
MD38 18/05/2016 04:23 Metallic coupling 599 636.8 2 941 138.4 Recovered to deck
MD40 18/05/2016 06:53 Metallic ring 599 650.4 2 941 181.6 Recovered to deck
MD41 18/05/2016 07:07 Fish trap 599 647.7 2 941 184.4 Could not be recovered by ROV

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Table 8.2: AS-A-B Platform Site: Relocated Position of Metallic Debris

Relocated Position
ID Date Time Description Remarks
Easting [m] Northing [m]
MD02 16/05/2016 05:16 Metallic debris with soft rope 599 740.1 2 940 968.2 Debris relocated outside survey area by ROV
Table 8.3: AS-A-B Platform Site: As-found Positions of Non-metallic Debris

Non-Metallic Debris

ND01 16/05/2016 03:02 Soft rope 599 809.7 2940 997.6 No action
ND02 16/05/2016 04:20 Rubber 599 780.5 2 941 004.7 No action
ND05 16/05/2016 08:07 Non-metallic debris canvas 599 800.4 2 941 127.4 No action
ND06 16/05/2016 08:13 Large piece of canvas 599 798.7 2 941 121.1 No action
ND09 16/05/2016 09:12 Fishing line with anchor block 599 793.9 2 941 131.2 No action
ND10 16/05/2016 09:26 Bunch of soft rope 599 787.0 2 941 136.4 No action
ND13 16/05/2016 16:55 Bundle of soft line 599 774.0 2 941 139.2 No action

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Non-Metallic Debris

ND15 16/05/2016 18:48 Small soft line 599 708.2 2 941 112.6 No action
ND21 16/05/2016 21:48 Plastic 599 664.2 2 941 119.9 No action
ND23 16/05/2016 22:24 Small piece of concrete block 599 719.1 2 941 198.0 No action
ND25 16/05/2016 22:41 Soft debris 599 702.0 2 941 198.2 No action
ND26 16/05/2016 22:45 Grout bag remnant 599 702.9 2 941 195.7 No action
ND27 16/05/2016 22:51 Piece of rope 599 690.5 2 941 172.8 No action
ND29 17/05/2016 00:10 Wood or fibre glass 599 688.8 2 941 191.8 No action
ND34 17/05/2016 05:56 Tire/Fender 599 648.9 2 941 164.4 No action
ND35 17/05/2016 06:00 Soft debris / Canvas 599 652.1 2 941 169.2 No action

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Non-Metallic Debris

ND38 17/05/2016 06:58 Non-metallic debris 599 648.8 2 941 183.1 No action
XX01 16/05/2016 20:20 Linear object / Rubber 599 716.8 2 941 159.6 No action

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Seabed Features
The combined ROV and bathymetry survey indicated the presence of sixteen (16) spudcan depressions
and three (3) coral outcrops. No pipelines were detected within the survey corridor, however, a GVI was
conducted along two pipelines located immediately to the north and west of the survey area.
The details of the spudcan depressions and coral outcrops are presented in Table 8.4 and Table 8.5
below.
Table 8.4: Details of Spudcan Depressions within the Survey Area

Position Dimension in [m]
ID Description
Easting [m] Northing [m] (diameter x depth)
SC01 Spudcan depression 599 769.9 2 940 997.2 13.0 x 1.5

Table 8.5: Details of Coral Outcrops within the Survey Area

Position
ID Description Remarks
Easting [m] Northing [m]
SF01 Coral outcrop 599 769.2 2 941 102.0 On rim of the spudcan depression
SF02 Coral outcrop 599 780.8 2 941 131.7 On rim of the spudcan depression
SF03 Coral outcrop 599 713.1 2 941 156.7 Over sediment heap close to spudcan depression
A few seabed scars were interpreted from the multibeam data and could be attributed to previous
rig/vessel movements within the survey corridor.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
The multibeam data image below provides an overview of the AS-A-B Platform site.
AS-A-B Platform
Pipeline
250 m
Survey Limit
Spudcans
Seabed scar
Spudcans
Northing [m]
Easting [m]
Figure 8.1: Multibeam data image of the AS-A-B platform site

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
ROV Still Images of As-left and Relocated Metallic Debris
Image 8.1: MD01 metallic wire rope – could not be recovered by ROV
Image 8.2: MD02 metallic debris – Relocated outside survey area

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Image 8.3: MD10 metallic rope – could not be recovered by ROV
Image 8.4: MD11 metallic rope – could not be recovered by ROV

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Image 8.5: MD22 metallic pipe – could not be recovered by ROV
Image 8.6: MD41 fish trap – could not be recovered by ROV

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
APPENDICES

C. TIDAL DATA
D. EQUIPMENT
E. CHARTS
F. SERVICE WARRANTY
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendices

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix A

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
B.3 TSDIPS (SOUND VELOCITY PROFILES)
B.5 MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix B

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix B.1

26/03/2008 1 of 2
FSME-830.77 DGPS VERIFICATION
Vessel DGPS Location Date

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS PORT G2 Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
Instrument Coordinates (mE, mN) Grid Convergence Quayside on Job No.
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019
Obs. Time Observations Reductions

C-O
No. (GMT) Total Station Calc Antenna Pos Obs Starfix HP Pos
Grid Bearing Distance Baseline Easting Northing Easting Northing DE DN
Deg Min Sec m Deg Min Sec m m m m m m
1 6:45:13 100 05 20 105.498 329 4 37 559716.676 2866766.658 559716.596 2866766.589 0.08 0.07
2 6:48:17 100 05 45 105.501 329 4 37 559716.683 2866766.647 559716.556 2866766.582 0.13 0.06
3 6:51:32 100 05 21 105.489 329 4 37 559716.668 2866766.654 559716.564 2866766.607 0.10 0.05
4 6:54:38 100 06 44 105.494 329 4 37 559716.687 2866766.616 559716.604 2866766.567 0.08 0.05
5 6:57:43 100 05 54 105.492 329 4 37 559716.676 2866766.639 559716.583 2866766.596 0.09 0.04
6 7:01:01 100 06 01 105.500 329 4 37 559716.685 2866766.639 559716.587 2866766.566 0.10 0.07
7 7:04:14 100 06 17 105.494 329 4 37 559716.683 2866766.629 559716.584 2866766.580 0.10 0.05
8 7:08:18 100 07 56 105.491 329 4 37 559716.698 2866766.581 559716.545 2866766.555 0.15 0.03
9 7:13:22 100 06 13 105.476 329 4 37 559716.665 2866766.625 559716.557 2866766.576 0.11 0.05
10 7:19:57 100 05 29 105.479 329 4 37 559716.660 2866766.647 559716.530 2866766.598 0.13 0.05
11 7:22:59 100 06 55 105.482 329 4 37 559716.678 2866766.607 559716.535 2866766.555 0.14 0.05
12 7:26:15 100 06 57 105.504 329 4 37 559716.699 2866766.614 559716.546 2866766.529 0.15 0.08
13 7:29:19 100 07 03 105.480 329 4 37 559716.678 2866766.602 559716.531 2866766.572 0.15 0.03
14 7:33:45 100 06 42 105.480 329 4 37 559716.674 2866766.612 559716.546 2866766.519 0.13 0.09
15 7:37:16 100 09 27 105.476 329 4 37 559716.700 2866766.532 559716.583 2866766.483 0.12 0.05
MEAN 559716.681 2866766.620 559716.563 2866766.565
C-O 0.12 0.06
STDV 0.02 0.02
26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS PORT G2 Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019
General Diagram General Information
Date of Survey: 14-May-16

Vessel: DPV Allianz Zeus
Owner: Allianz Marine
DGPS Port Projection: UTM Zone 39
Datum: Nahrwan 1967 (Qatar)
Inst. Used Trimble 3603 DR
Total Station
Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 8 Comments
PCBQ191
The Total Station was set up
on PCBQ191 (static GPS) control sta. pt.
Observations were made to the prism
attached to the GPS Antenna (Port).
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS STBD G2 Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019

C-O
1 6:45:47 104 37 11 108.160 329 4 37 559721.887 2866759.499 559721.762 2866759.379 0.12 0.12
2 6:48:37 104 38 28 108.156 329 4 37 559721.894 2866759.459 559721.785 2866759.386 0.11 0.07
3 6:51:50 104 37 28 108.151 329 4 37 559721.881 2866759.488 559721.744 2866759.400 0.14 0.09
4 6:54:59 104 38 05 108.167 329 4 37 559721.901 2866759.474 559721.784 2866759.369 0.12 0.10
5 6:58:04 104 37 41 108.142 329 4 37 559721.874 2866759.479 559721.740 2866759.420 0.13 0.06
6 7:01:24 104 37 13 108.153 329 4 37 559721.880 2866759.496 559721.759 2866759.367 0.12 0.13
7 7:04:33 104 38 01 108.147 329 4 37 559721.882 2866759.470 559721.759 2866759.374 0.12 0.10
8 7:08:36 104 37 49 108.147 329 4 37 559721.880 2866759.476 559721.752 2866759.376 0.13 0.10
9 7:13:43 104 37 13 108.156 329 4 37 559721.883 2866759.497 559721.781 2866759.388 0.10 0.11
10 7:20:15 104 37 08 108.143 329 4 37 559721.870 2866759.496 559721.741 2866759.411 0.13 0.08
11 7:23:15 104 38 09 108.148 329 4 37 559721.884 2866759.466 559721.773 2866759.379 0.11 0.09
12 7:26:33 104 37 52 108.133 329 4 37 559721.867 2866759.471 559721.723 2866759.408 0.14 0.06
13 7:35:58 104 41 51 108.139 329 4 37 559721.908 2866759.352 559721.760 2866759.265 0.15 0.09
14 7:36:30 104 41 27 108.136 329 4 37 559721.901 2866759.363 559721.814 2866759.263 0.09 0.10
15 7:37:35 104 43 27 108.155 329 4 37 559721.937 2866759.308 559721.806 2866759.213 0.13 0.10
MEAN 559721.889 2866759.453 559721.766 2866759.360
C-O 0.12 0.09
STDV 0.02 0.02
26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS STBD G2 Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019
DGPS Stbd Date of Survey: 14-May-16

Projection: UTM Zone 39
Total Station
PCBQ191
attached to the GPS Antenna (Stbd).
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS PORT XP Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019

C-O
1 6:45:13 100 05 20 105.498 329 4 37 559716.676 2866766.658 559716.550 2866766.600 0.13 0.06
2 6:48:17 100 05 45 105.501 329 4 37 559716.683 2866766.647 559716.508 2866766.592 0.18 0.05
3 6:51:32 100 05 21 105.489 329 4 37 559716.668 2866766.654 559716.521 2866766.613 0.15 0.04
4 6:54:38 100 06 44 105.494 329 4 37 559716.687 2866766.616 559716.567 2866766.579 0.12 0.04
5 6:57:43 100 05 54 105.492 329 4 37 559716.676 2866766.639 559716.533 2866766.605 0.14 0.03
6 7:01:01 100 06 01 105.500 329 4 37 559716.685 2866766.639 559716.541 2866766.574 0.14 0.06
7 7:04:14 100 06 17 105.494 329 4 37 559716.683 2866766.629 559716.535 2866766.585 0.15 0.04
8 7:08:18 100 07 56 105.491 329 4 37 559716.698 2866766.581 559716.501 2866766.573 0.20 0.01
9 7:13:22 100 06 13 105.476 329 4 37 559716.665 2866766.625 559716.518 2866766.584 0.15 0.04
10 7:19:57 100 05 29 105.479 329 4 37 559716.660 2866766.647 559716.500 2866766.610 0.16 0.04
11 7:22:59 100 06 55 105.482 329 4 37 559716.678 2866766.607 559716.490 2866766.565 0.19 0.04
12 7:26:15 100 06 57 105.504 329 4 37 559716.699 2866766.614 559716.512 2866766.532 0.19 0.08
13 7:29:19 100 07 03 105.480 329 4 37 559716.678 2866766.602 559716.484 2866766.566 0.19 0.04
14 7:33:45 100 06 42 105.480 329 4 37 559716.674 2866766.612 559716.509 2866766.511 0.16 0.10
15 7:37:16 100 09 27 105.476 329 4 37 559716.700 2866766.532 559716.553 2866766.478 0.15 0.05
MEAN 559716.681 2866766.620 559716.521 2866766.571
C-O 0.16 0.05
STDV 0.02 0.02
26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS PORT XP Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019

DGPS Port Projection: UTM Zone 39
Total Station
PCBQ191
attached to the GPS Antenna (Port).
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS STBD XP Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019

C-O
1 6:45:47 104 37 11 108.160 329 4 37 559721.887 2866759.499 559721.801 2866759.389 0.09 0.11
2 6:48:37 104 38 28 108.156 329 4 37 559721.894 2866759.459 559721.814 2866759.396 0.08 0.06
3 6:51:50 104 37 28 108.151 329 4 37 559721.881 2866759.488 559721.760 2866759.422 0.12 0.07
4 6:54:59 104 38 05 108.167 329 4 37 559721.901 2866759.474 559721.795 2866759.394 0.11 0.08
5 6:58:04 104 37 41 108.142 329 4 37 559721.874 2866759.479 559721.766 2866759.441 0.11 0.04
6 7:01:24 104 37 13 108.153 329 4 37 559721.880 2866759.496 559721.780 2866759.387 0.10 0.11
7 7:04:33 104 38 01 108.147 329 4 37 559721.882 2866759.470 559721.769 2866759.394 0.11 0.08
8 7:08:36 104 37 49 108.147 329 4 37 559721.880 2866759.476 559721.762 2866759.396 0.12 0.08
9 7:13:43 104 37 13 108.156 329 4 37 559721.883 2866759.497 559721.799 2866759.422 0.08 0.07
10 7:20:15 104 37 08 108.143 329 4 37 559721.870 2866759.496 559721.758 2866759.419 0.11 0.08
11 7:23:15 104 38 09 108.148 329 4 37 559721.884 2866759.466 559721.801 2866759.384 0.08 0.08
12 7:26:33 104 37 52 108.133 329 4 37 559721.867 2866759.471 559721.741 2866759.417 0.13 0.05
13 7:35:58 104 41 51 108.139 329 4 37 559721.908 2866759.352 559721.790 2866759.254 0.12 0.10
14 7:36:30 104 41 27 108.136 329 4 37 559721.901 2866759.363 559721.836 2866759.249 0.07 0.11
15 7:37:35 104 43 27 108.155 329 4 37 559721.937 2866759.308 559721.842 2866759.192 0.10 0.12
MEAN 559721.889 2866759.453 559721.788 2866759.370
C-O 0.10 0.08
STDV 0.02 0.02
26/03/2008 1 of 2

'DPV Allianz Zeus' GPS STBD XP Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 08 14-May-16
559618.076 2866729.136 -0.2602 Port PCBQ019
DGPS Stbd Date of Survey: 14-May-16

Total Station
PCBQ191
attached to the GPS Antenna (Stbd).
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

19/03/2008 1 1 of 2
FSME-830.51 GYRO CALIBRATION - TOTAL STATION OBSERVATIONS
NOTE: Ensure that all populated cells are considered during calculations of C-O and SD
Vessel Gyro Port Location Date
'DPV Allianz Zeus' TSS Meridian Surveyor Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 8 14/05/2016
Inst. Co-ordinates (mE, mN) Grid Convergence Quayside on Job No.
559618.076 2866729.136 0.2606 PORT PCBQ019

No. Bow Stern Bow Stern Calc'd Obs'd Diff.
Grid Bearing Distance Grid Bearing Distance Easting Northing Easting Northing Grid Azimuth Vessel Decimal
Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec Bng Hdg Degrees
1 6:46:14 100 40 08 89.862 106 05 43 67.756 559702.381 2866760.245 559683.576 2866746.476 53.79 54.05 54.83 -0.78
2 6:49:00 100 40 12 89.855 106 06 48 67.752 559702.375 2866760.241 559683.577 2866746.454 53.74 54.00 54.83 -0.83
3 6:52:16 100 40 08 89.851 106 06 31 67.748 559702.371 2866760.241 559683.572 2866746.459 53.75 54.01 54.83 -0.82
4 6:55:34 100 40 52 89.894 106 07 50 67.759 559702.418 2866760.238 559683.589 2866746.436 53.76 54.02 54.83 -0.81
5 6:58:32 100 40 50 89.854 106 07 07 67.752 559702.380 2866760.225 559683.579 2866746.448 53.77 54.03 54.83 -0.80
6 7:01:43 100 40 47 89.866 106 07 06 67.745 559702.391 2866760.230 559683.572 2866746.447 53.78 54.04 54.83 -0.79
7 7:04:58 100 40 30 89.856 106 07 37 67.757 559702.379 2866760.234 559683.586 2866746.440 53.72 53.98 54.83 -0.85
8 7:09:03 100 40 20 89.850 106 07 34 67.754 559702.372 2866760.236 559683.583 2866746.440 53.71 53.97 54.83 -0.86
9 7:19:17 100 40 38 89.846 106 07 15 67.748 559702.371 2866760.227 559683.576 2866746.445 53.75 54.01 54.83 -0.83
10 7:20:35 100 40 48 89.845 106 06 36 67.732 559702.372 2866760.223 559683.557 2866746.453 53.80 54.06 54.83 -0.77
11 7:23:36 100 40 57 89.844 106 07 08 67.738 559702.372 2866760.219 559683.565 2866746.444 53.78 54.04 54.83 -0.79
12 7:26:52 100 41 39 89.854 106 06 57 67.743 559702.388 2866760.205 559683.569 2866746.449 53.83 54.09 54.83 -0.74
13 7:29:58 100 40 53 89.845 106 06 47 67.726 559702.372 2866760.221 559683.552 2866746.448 53.80 54.06 54.83 -0.77
14 7:34:05 100 40 56 89.839 106 06 56 67.706 559702.367 2866760.217 559683.533 2866746.440 53.81 54.07 54.67 -0.59
15 7:37:51 100 44 22 89.826 106 08 45 67.692 559702.386 2866760.129 559683.529 2866746.402 53.95 54.21 55.00 -0.79
53.78 54.04 C-O -0.79
STDV 0.06
19/03/2008 1 2 of 2
Vessel Gyro Port Location Date

559618.076 2866729.136 0.2606 PORT PCBQ019

Trimble 3603 DR
Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 8 Inst. Used
Total Station
PCBQ191
Comments

on PCBQ191 GPS (static) control point.
attached to the bow and stern of the vessel.
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

19/03/2008 1 1 of 2
NOTE: Ensure that all populated cells are considered during calculations of C-O and SD
Vessel Gyro Stbd Location Date
559618.076 2866729.136 0.2606 PORT PCBQ019

No. Bow Stern Bow Stern Calc'd Obs'd Diff.
Grid Bearing Distance Grid Bearing Distance Easting Northing Easting Northing Grid Azimuth Vessel Decimal
Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec Bng Hdg Degrees
1 6:46:14 100 40 08 89.862 106 05 43 67.756 559702.381 2866760.245 559683.576 2866746.476 53.79 54.05 53.87 0.18
2 6:49:00 100 40 12 89.855 106 06 48 67.752 559702.375 2866760.241 559683.577 2866746.454 53.74 54.00 53.87 0.13
3 6:52:16 100 40 08 89.851 106 06 31 67.748 559702.371 2866760.241 559683.572 2866746.459 53.75 54.01 53.88 0.13
4 6:55:34 100 40 52 89.894 106 07 50 67.759 559702.418 2866760.238 559683.589 2866746.436 53.76 54.02 53.91 0.11
5 6:58:32 100 40 50 89.854 106 07 07 67.752 559702.380 2866760.225 559683.579 2866746.448 53.77 54.03 53.88 0.15
6 7:01:43 100 40 47 89.866 106 07 06 67.745 559702.391 2866760.230 559683.572 2866746.447 53.78 54.04 53.83 0.21
7 7:04:58 100 40 30 89.856 106 07 37 67.757 559702.379 2866760.234 559683.586 2866746.440 53.72 53.98 53.87 0.11
8 7:09:03 100 40 20 89.850 106 07 34 67.754 559702.372 2866760.236 559683.583 2866746.440 53.71 53.97 53.86 0.11
9 7:19:17 100 40 38 89.846 106 07 15 67.748 559702.371 2866760.227 559683.576 2866746.445 53.75 54.01 53.85 0.16
10 7:20:35 100 40 48 89.845 106 06 36 67.732 559702.372 2866760.223 559683.557 2866746.453 53.80 54.06 53.84 0.22
11 7:23:36 100 40 57 89.844 106 07 08 67.738 559702.372 2866760.219 559683.565 2866746.444 53.78 54.04 53.87 0.17
12 7:26:52 100 41 39 89.854 106 06 57 67.743 559702.388 2866760.205 559683.569 2866746.449 53.83 54.09 53.83 0.26
13 7:29:58 100 40 53 89.845 106 06 47 67.726 559702.372 2866760.221 559683.552 2866746.448 53.80 54.06 53.87 0.19
14 7:34:05 100 40 56 89.839 106 06 56 67.706 559702.367 2866760.217 559683.533 2866746.440 53.81 54.07 53.78 0.29
15 7:37:51 100 44 22 89.826 106 08 45 67.692 559702.386 2866760.129 559683.529 2866746.402 53.95 54.21 53.94 0.27
53.78 54.04 C-O 0.18
STDV 0.06
19/03/2008 1 2 of 2
Vessel Gyro Stbd Location Date

559618.076 2866729.136 0.2606 PORT PCBQ019

Trimble 3603 DR
Ras Laffan Port, Berthing 8 Inst. Used
Total Station
PCBQ191
Comments

on PCBQ191 GPS (static) control point.
attached to the bow and stern of the vessel.
PCBQ192
Note: Not To Scale

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Fugro Survey (Middle East) Limited
FSME 830.34 - Sound Velocity Profile Report
Project Information
Date: 16-05-2016 Latitude: 26° 35' 16.8'' N Equipment Name: Valeport 602
Time: 01:37:00 Longitude: 52° 0' 8.6'' E Equipment Model: Valeport 602
Project No: PCBQ019 Local Easting: 599817.9 mE Calibration Date: 01/03/2016
Client: MAERSK OIL AS Local Northing: 2490957.4 mN Asset No: N/A
Location: NNE Location, AS Line Name: AS AB 250 Serial No: 19777
Vessel/Barge: Allianz Zeus Line KP: -0.011 SV Cast No: 3
Sound Velocity Profile Temperature Profile

Sound Velocity (m/s) Temperature (°C)
1528 1530 1532 1534 1536 1538 1540 1542 1544 1546 1548 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
10.0
30.0
Depth (m)
40.0
20.0
50.0
60.0
30.0
Temp:DnCast Temp:UpCast Temp:Smooth

70.0
Depth (m)
Salinity Profile
Salinity (psu)
39.5 40.0 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0
0.0
40.0
10.0
41
20.0
50.0
30.0
Depth (m)
40.0
60.0
50.0
60.0
Salinity:DnCast Salinity:UpCast
SoS:DnCast SoS:UpCast SoS:Smooth
70.0
70.0
Salinity:Smooth
Sound Velocity Cast Results

Surface Transducer Seabed Average Resistivity [Ohm.M] No of Data DnCast 40
0.18053
Sound Velocity [m/s] 1546.42 1546.53 1529.89 1537.89 at Seabed Processed UpCast 52
Temperature [°C] 27.72 27.64 20.23 23.65 Average Density Max DnCast 61.2
1028.36
Salinity [PSU] 40.43 40.61 40.96 40.94 [KG/M3] Depth[M] UpCast 61.2
Sound Velocity is calculated using Chen and Millero (1977) formula
Report No :PCBQ019_003_201605160137_SVP Cast Report Processed By : EMS/MRR Raw Data Filename : 20160516_0137.TXT
Fugro Survey (Middle East) Limited
FSME 830.34 - Sound Velocity Profile Report
Project Information
Date: 17-05-2016 Latitude: 26° 35' 19.5'' N Equipment Name: Valeport 602
Time: 10:52:00 Longitude: 52° 0' 9.7'' E Equipment Model: Valeport 602
Project No: PCBQ019 Local Easting: 599847.99 mE Calibration Date: 01/03/2016
Client: MAERSK OIL AS Local Northing: 2941039.15 mN Asset No: N/A
Location: AS-AB Location Line Name: AS AB 250 Serial No: 19777
Vessel/Barge: Allianz Zeus Line KP: 0 SV Cast No: 4
Sound Velocity Profile Temperature Profile

Sound Velocity (m/s) Temperature (°C)
1525 1530 1535 1540 1545 1550 0 10 20 30 40
0.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
10.0
30.0
Depth (m)
40.0
20.0
50.0
60.0
30.0
Temp:DnCast Temp:UpCast
70.0
Temp:Smooth
Depth (m)
Salinity Profile
Salinity (psu)
39.5 40.0 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 42.5
0.0
40.0
10.0
41
20.0
50.0
30.0
Depth (m)
40.0
60.0
50.0
60.0
Salinity:DnCast Salinity:UpCast
SoS:DnCast SoS:UpCast SoS:Smooth
70.0
70.0
Salinity:Smooth
Sound Velocity Cast Results

Resistivity
Surface Transducer Seabed Average No of Data DnCast 45
[Ohm.M] at 0.18147
Sound Velocity [m/s] 1548.62 1529.20 1529.20 1536.76 Processed UpCast 52
Seabed
Temperature [°C] 28.54 19.95 19.95 23.22 Average Density Max DnCast 63.0
1028.48
Salinity [PSU] 40.86 40.99 40.99 40.94 [KG/M3] Depth[M] UpCast 63.0
Sound Velocity is calculated using Chen and Millero (1977) formula
Report No :PCBQ019_004_201605171052_SVP Cast Report Processed By : EMS/MRR Raw Data Filename : 20160517_1052.TXT
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

GAPS USBL SYSTEM VERIFICATION - PCBQ019
NNE UER DISPOSAL WELL (SUBSEA PROTECTION FRAME CENTER) E 601228.32, N 2943350.81
Mean Position Fixes taken With ROV Facing Legs of Well Head (CW)
NNE Position Provided by
ROV Position client
ROV Difference Difference
Position Heading Leg No Easting Northing Easting Northing Easting Northing
SOUTH 352.08 A1 601229.10 2943350.84 601228.32 2943350.81 0.78 0.03
WEST 089.30 A2 601229.14 2943351.28 601228.32 2943350.81 0.82 0.47
NORTH 173.06 B2 601228.56 2943351.54 601228.32 2943350.81 0.24 0.73
EAST 260.65 B1 601228.91 2943351.48 601228.32 2943350.81 0.59 0.67
Mean 601228.93 2943351.29 601228.32 2943350.81 0.61 0.48
Std Dev 0.26 0.32
Observed coordinates to Existing coordinates Difference 0.61 0.48
Mean Position Fixes taken With ROV Facing Legs of Well Head (CCW)
NNE Position Provided by
ROV Position client
ROV Difference Difference
Position Heading Leg No Easting Northing Easting Northing Easting Northing
SOUTH 001.88 A1 601229.06 2943351.37 601228.32 2943350.81 0.74 0.56
WEST 085.44 A2 601228.87 2943351.98 601228.32 2943350.81 0.55 1.17
NORTH 163.19 B2 601229.06 2943352.16 601228.32 2943350.81 0.74 1.35
EAST 254.72 B1 601229.59 2943351.76 601228.32 2943350.81 1.27 0.95
Mean 601229.15 2943351.82 601228.32 2943350.81 0.83 1.01
Std Dev 0.31 0.34
Observed coordinates to Existing coordinates Difference 0.83 1.01
Final Mean 601229.04 2943351.55 601228.32 2943350.81 0.72 0.74
Observed coordinates to
Range 1.03 Brg (G) 224.22°
Existing coordinates
Signed Signed
Name B. PASUPATHY Name GARY LIBBY
Designation FSME PARTY CHIEF Designation MAERSK CLIENT REP.
Date 16-May-16 Date 16-May-16
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

FUGRO SURVEY (MIDDLE EAST) LIMITED
FIELD REPORT NUMBER PCBQ019_MBES_CAL_AZ
Subject: MULTIBEAM ECHO SOUNDER CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

Doc Date: 31 May 2016
Doc File Ref: PCBQ019_MBES_CAL_AZ.doc
Project Title: RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEAREANCE SURVEY, AS-A-B, AS-C-D, AND AS-I-A
PLATFORMS, AL SHAHEEN FIELD, STATE QATAR
Client: MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
End Client: MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Survey Location: Al SHAHEEN FIELD
Vessel: ALLIANZ ZEUS
FSME Project No: PCBQ019
Date of Calibration: 17 May 2016
Document Issue:
Digital and Paper Field Report issued to Client YTM 31 May 2016
Copy Reason for Issue Prepared by Date
P.O. Box 43088, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Tel No. +971 2 5547810, Fax No. +971 2 5547811, http://www.fugro-uae.com
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
MULTIBEAM ECHO SOUNDER CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION
AL SHAHEEN FIELD, STATE OF QATAR
CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Pre Calibration 1
2. GEODETIC PARAMETERS 2
2.1 Units 2
2.2 Geodetic and Projection Parameters 2
3. SETTINGS 3
4. CALIBRATION 5
4.1 Method 5
4.1.1 Latency Calibration 6
4.1.2 Pitch Calibration 6
4.1.3 Roll Calibration 6
4.1.4 Heading (or Yaw) Calibration 6
5. RESULTS 7
APPENDIX
A. SURVEY RECORD EXAMPLES
TABLES
Table 3.1: Multibeam Echo Sounder Settings 3
Table 3.2: Motion Sensor Settings 3
Table 3.3: Calibration Location 3
Table 3.4: Loaded Calibration Lines 3
Table 3.5: Weather Conditions 4
Table 5.1: Multibeam Echo Sounder Calibration Results 7
FIGURE
Figure 4.1: Calibration Line Plan 5
FSME / PCBQ019_Cal_MBES_AZ Page i

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
1. INTRODUCTION
The Reson SeaBat 7125 Multibeam echo sounder onboard the Allianz Zeus was calibrated on 17 May
2016. The calibration was undertaken over 32in Ras Gas Export Pipeline from RG-A to Ras Laffan, Al
Shaheen Field. The purpose of calibrating the system was to determine the angular difference
between the pitch, roll and heading sensors with the multibeam head installation, and time delay in the
positioning system.
When the multibeam transducer, motion sensor and gyrocompass are installed on a vessel, there is
always going to be some residual misalignment between the sensors. During survey operations the
multibeam data, with appropriate offset corrections, needs to be derived relative to true vertical. Any
deviations in roll will translate to depth measurement errors in the outer beams, increasing with beam
angle. Deviations in pitch will result in along track position errors. Similarly, heading (or yaw) offsets
between the planes of the multibeam transmit beam and the alignment of the vessel reported by the
gyro will result in position errors on the soundings from the outer beams. These errors will increase
both with beam angle off nadir and water depth.
It is also necessary to determine any latency within the positioning system to ensure that the data
collection system is synchronised to GPS time. The difference in time from the moment when a
position is valid until the position message is sent to the data collection system must be determined.
Commonly used DGPS receivers have latencies ranging from 200 milliseconds to over one second. If
the data collection system does not correct for this latency, the result is a speed dependent position
error in the data.
The “Allianz Zeus” has primary motion sensor fitted on the Multibeam deployment frame inside the
moon pool.
1.1 Pre Calibration

The following operations were carried out prior to calibration:
• Location of appropriate calibration feature
• Draft measurement of echo sounders
• Gyrocompass calibration
• DGPS verification
• TS Dip
• Check time offset of positioning system and motion sensors
• Check operation of motion sensors
FSME / PCBQ019_Cal_MBES_AZ Page 1

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
2. GEODETIC PARAMETERS
2.1 Units
• Coordinates, lengths and heights are expressed in International metres [m]
• Angles are expressed in degrees
• Times are Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
2.2 Geodetic and Projection Parameters

The following geodetic parameters were used during the calibration:

Global Positioning System Geodetic Parameters 1)
Spheroid: World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84)
Datum: ITRF 2005
Semi major axis: 6356752.3142 m
Inverse Flattening: 298.2572236
Local Datum Geodetic Parameters 2)
Spheroid: Clarke 1880
Datum: Nahrwan 1967
Semi major axis: 6378249.148 m
Inverse Flattening: 293.465
Datum Transformation Parameters 3) from WGS84 to Nahrwan
Shift dX: +250.20 m Rotation rX: 0.0 arcsec Scale Factor: 0.0 ppm
Project Projection Parameters
Grid Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Central Meridian: 51° 00’ 00” East (Zone 39)
False Northing: 0m
Scale factor on Central Meridian: 0.9996
Units: Metre
Grid Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Notes:
1) Fugro Starfix navigation software always uses WGS84 geodetic parameters as a primary datum for any
geodetic calculations.
2) Source: Maersk Oil Qatar AS – MOQ-SS-10-02-00 Rev5.1
3) This is the right-handed coordinate frame rotation convention used by the Fugro Starfix navigation
software.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
3. SETTINGS
Table 3.1: Multibeam Echo Sounder Settings

Multibeam Echo Sounder
MBE Device Type Reson SeaBat 7125
Cast Reference CAST 3D
Transducer Sound Velocity 1548 m/s
MBE Device Reson SeaBat 7125
Position Device Starfix G2
Heading Device TSS Meridian Surveyor
Heave Device Seatex 5 MRU
Pitch / Roll Device Seatex 5 MRU
Total Swath Width 100m
Position Offset from CRP
X Offset -1.667 m
Y Offset 1.459 m
Z Offset -6.492
Transducer Draft 4.46 m
Gyrocompass correction 0.68
Table 3.2: Motion Sensor Settings

Motion Sensor
Motion sensor Device Seatex 5 MRU
Lever arm to Centre of Gravity
X Offset -1.570 m
Y Offset 1.670 m
Z Offset 1.020 m
Lever arm to Measurement Point
X Offset 0.000 m
Y Offset 0.000 m
Z Offset -5.470 m
Mounding angle
Roll -179.81
Pitch 1.16
Yaw -0.00
Heave settings
Period 10.0
Damping 0.60
Table 3.3: Calibration Location

Nahrwan Datum, Clarke 1880 Spheroid, UTM Projection, CM 51° East, Zone 39, North
Location Easting [m] Northing [m] Depth Range [m]
Al Shaheen Field 596200 2942900 60.0 – 61.5
Table 3.4: Loaded Calibration Lines

Calibration Line Logging Session Average Heading (deg) Average Speed (knots)
Heading 201605171233 121 1.5
Latency 201605171251 301 1.8
Pitch/ Roll 201605171332 301 1.5
Pitch/ Roll 201605171351 121 1.5
Latency 201605171405 301 1.0
Heading 201605171427 121 1.5

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Table 3.5: Weather Conditions

Wind Direction Wind Speed Sea State
Variable 5-7 knots Calm

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
4. CALIBRATION
4.1 Method
Six (6) lines were run, four (4) were over the same location and two were offset by 100 m either side.
Calibration lines were processed using the multibeam calibration software program within Fugro’s
Starfix suite to find correction values in the following order:
• Latency
• Pitch
• Roll
• Heading (or Yaw)
60 meters 60 meters
32in Dry Gas Pipeline from RG-A to Ras Laffan
3 5
2
6 1
Figure 4.1: Calibration Line Plan

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
4.1.1 Latency Calibration

Latency error was measured by running two lines over the established point, one at a low survey
speed and another at a high survey speed, in the same direction.
The positioning system latency correction was derived by iteratively reducing the difference in distance
between along track positions of the well marked object until the two data sets aligned.
Zero latency has been achieved by using GPS time synchronisation (1 PPS) with the help of the Fugro
Starfix.G2 system.
4.1.2 Pitch Calibration

A latency correction of 0.0 was applied before deriving the pitch offset error.
Pitch offset error was measured from reciprocal lines that were run over the established point at a
speed of 1.5 knots.
The pitch offset correction of -0.20° was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in vertical angle
through nadir along the along track calibration line until the two data sets aligned.
4.1.3 Roll Calibration

A pitch correction of -0.20° was applied before deriving the roll offset error.
The roll offset error was measured by running reciprocal survey lines over a flat area of seabed then
comparing the across track profiles against one another.
The roll offset correction -0.85° was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in horizontal angle
along an across track calibration line until the two data sets aligned.
4.1.4 Heading (or Yaw) Calibration

A roll and pitch offset correction of -0.85° and 0.20° were applied before deriving the heading offset
error.
The heading offset error was derived by iteratively reducing the difference in orientation angle to a
target resolved in 2 lines run in the same direction and 60 m apart.
A heading offset correction of 0.-50° was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in orientation
angle of each swath until the target aligned within the overlapping central region.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
5. RESULTS
The Seatex MRU5 was used as the primary motion sensor during the calibration procedure and during
the survey period. A summary of calibration results is given below:
Table 5.1: Multibeam Echo Sounder Calibration Results

Date Motion Sensor Latency Pitch Error Roll Error Heading Error
(seconds) (°) (°) (°)
2016-05-17 Seatex 5 MRU 0.00 -0.20 -0.85 -0.50
The data examples show screen dumps before and after the application of calibration corrections and
an image showing the final corrected data set can be found in Appendix A.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
A. SURVEY RECORD EXAMPLES
MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION DATA EXAMPLE No. 1
IMAGE DESCRIPTION CALIBRATED SENSOR

Screen dump from LATENCY ERROR CHECK Reson SeaBat 7125
Starfix Surface 0 SECONDS APPLIED Multibeam Echo Sounder
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date of Survey: 17 May 2016
Vessel: Allianz Zeus
Survey Equipment: Reson SeaBat 7125
Recording Medium: Digital
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m
FSME / PCBQ019_Cal_MBES_AZ Appendix A

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from Reson SeaBat 7125
Starfix Surface PITCH ERROR UNCORRECTED Multibeam Echo Sounder
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from PITCH ERROR Reson SeaBat 7125
Starfix Surface -0.20° CORRECTION APPLIED Multibeam Echo Sounder
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from ROLL ERROR UNCORRECTED Reson SeaBat 7125
Starfix Surface Multibeam Echo Sounder
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from ROLL ERROR Reson SeaBat 7125
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from HEADING ERROR UNCORRECTED Reson SeaBat 7125
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

Screen dump from HEADING ERROR Reson SeaBat 7125
GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Screen dump from ALL DATA CORRECTED Reson SeaBat 7125

GENERAL INFORMATION
Scaling: N/A
Frequency: 400 KHz
Range: 80 m

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

FIELD REPORT 01
Subject: Mobilisation and Calibration; Ras Laffan Port and NNE Wellhead
Document Date: 18 May 2016
Document File Ref.: PCBQ019_Allianz Zeus Mobilisation & Calibration Report (Rev 0)
Project Title: Rig Entry and Debris Clearance Surveys
Client: Maersk Oil Qatar AS
Survey Location: Al Shaheen Field, Block 5, Offshore State of Qatar
FSME Project No.: PCBQ019
Date of Survey: 8 to 17 May 2016
Document Issue:
1 Digital Field Report issued to Client B. Pasupathy 27 May 2016
0 Digital Field Report issued to Client B. Pasupathy 25 May 2016
Rev. Copy Reason for Issue Prepared by Date
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEYS
AL SHAHEEN FIELD, BLOCK 5, OFFSHORE STATE OF QATAR
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Personnel 1
1.3 Equipment 2
1.4 Equipment Layout 3
2. GEODESY 4
2.1 Geodetic and Projection Parameters 4
2.2 Test Coordinate Computation 5
3. ESTABLISHEMENT OF CONTROL STATION 6
4. DPV ALLIANZ ZEUS AND ROV PANTHER XT 965 7

4.1 Gyrocompass and Motion Sensor Alignment Checks 7
4.1.1 Vessel Gyrocompass Alignment Checks 7
4.1.2 ROV Gyrocompass Alignment Check 7
4.2 Vessel and ROV Offset Measurements 8
4.2.1 Offset Measurements - DPV Allianz Zeus and ROV Panther XT 965 8
4.3 Position Systems Verifications 11
4.4 CTDS Cast 11
4.4.1 TSDIP at Ras Laffan Port and NNE Well Head Location 11
5. WELL HEAD GAPS POSITION VERIFICATION 17

5.1 NNE Well Head GAPS Verification 17
6. SYSTEM CONFIGURATION 19
APPENDICES
A. CONTROL STATIONS
B. GYROCOMPASS CALIBRATIONS
C. DGPS VERIFICATION
D. VELOCITY PROFILES
E. GAPS USBL VERIFICATION
F. SEIS CONFIGURATION SUMMARY
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Page ii

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
TABLES IN THE MAIN TEXT
Table 1.1: Survey Personnel - PCBQ019 1

Table 1.2: Equipment Listing - DPV Allianz Zeus 2
Table 2.2: Test Coordinate Computation 5
Table 4.1: Results of Vessel Gyrocompass Alignment Check 7
Table 4.2: Results of ROV Gyro Alignment Check 8
Table 4.3: DPV Allianz Zeus Offsets 8
Table 4.4: ROV ‘Panther XT 965’ Offsets 8
Table 4.7: Results of Offset Verifications 11
Table 4.8: Acoustic Velocity Results 12
Table 5.1: NNE Well Head Location 17
Table 5.2: Results of Position Verification at NNE Disposal Well Head 17
FIGURES IN THE MAIN TEXT
Figure 1.1: Equipment layout diagram 3

Figure 2.1: Results of the test coordinate computation 5
Figure 4.1: Offset diagram – DPV Allianz Zeus 9
Figure 4.2: Offset diagram - ROV Panther XT 965 10
Figure 4.3: PCBQ019_001_201605130730_SVP cast report smooth 13
Figure 4.4: PCBQ019_002_201605152050_SVP cast report smooth 14
Figure 4.5: SVP Profile 1 cast report for sensor comparison in Ras Laffan Port 15
Figure 4.6: SVP Profile 2 cast report for sensor comparison in Ras Laffan Port 16
Figure 5.1: Intersection of fixes at the NNE well head location 18
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Page iii

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Fugro was contracted by Maersk Oil Qatar AS (MOQ) (Client) to provide positioning and navigation
survey services for Rig Entry and Debris Clearance surveys onboard the DPV Allianz Zeus and the
client supplied Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Panther XT 965, in the Al Shaheen Field, Block 5,
offshore the State of Qatar.
Vessel calibrations were conducted while the vessel was alongside Ras Laffan Port Berth 8, on 14 May
2016. The USBL verification was conducted on 16 May 2016 at the NNE well head. The multibeam
MBES patch test calibration was conducted on 17 May 2016, in the Al Shaheen Field.
The following tests and calibrations were undertaken:
 Offset measurements of vessel and ROV;

 Establishment of 2 control stations;
 Positioning Systems verifications;
 Gyrocompass heading calibrations;
 Online configuration check;
 ROV Octans gyrocompass alignment check;
 ROV Octans vertical reference convention check;
 GAPS USBL verification at NNE well head;
 MBES patch test calibration.
1.2 Personnel
The following personnel were employed during the project period to provide General Visual Inspection
(GVI) survey services.
Table 1.1: Survey Personnel - PCBQ019

Personnel Name Function Period
Offshore B. Pasupathy Party Chief / Engineer Duration
Offshore Mateo Rana Senior Surveyor Duration
Offshore Erminio Sagayaga Senior Surveyor Duration
Onshore Livingstone Engineer 8 to 12 May 2016
Onshore Mike Lomax Project Manager Duration
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Page 1

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
1.3 Equipment
The following equipment was mobilised onboard:
Table 1.2: Equipment Listing - DPV Allianz Zeus

Positioning Systems
2x UPS power supply
Other Items
3x Trimble 5800 for Static GPS observations (Mobilisation only)
1x Seatex 5 MRU
2x CTDS probe
Client supplied IXSEA GAPS USBL
SeaBat 7125 Multibeam Echo Sounder System
Depth sensor
Altimeter
IXsea Octans Ti 1000 Submersible gyrocompass & Motion Sensor

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
1.4 Equipment Layout
Figure 1.1: Equipment layout diagram

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
2. GEODESY
2.1 Geodetic and Projection Parameters

Geodetic parameters used for the project were:

Global Positioning System Geodetic Parameters 1
Spheroid: World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) ITRF 2008 Current Epoch
Datum: World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) ITRF 2008 Current Epoch

1/
Inverse Flattening: f = 298.257 223 563
Local Datum Geodetic Parameters 2
Spheroid: Clarke 1880 (Modified)
Datum: Nahrwan (1967) (New Decca 1975 Datum)

1/
Inverse Flattening: f =293.465
Datum Transformation Parameters from WGS84 to Nahrwan (1967) 3
Scale
Shift dX: +250.20 m Rotation rX: 0.00 arcsec 0.00 ppm
Factor:
Local Projection Parameters
Map Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator, Northern Hemisphere
Grid System: UTM Zone 39 N
Central Meridian: 51° 00’ 00” East
False Northing: 0m
Scale Factor on Central Meridian: 0.9996
Units: Metre
Notes:
1. Fugro Starfix navigation software always uses WGS84 geodetic parameters as a primary datum for any
geodetic calculations.
2. Source: MOQ Survey Standard SS-10-02-00. Rev5.1
3. This is the right-handed coordinate frame rotation convention used by the Fugro Starfix navigation
software.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
2.2 Test Coordinate Computation

Prior to starting operations, the client supplied test coordinate was converted from WGS84 to the Local
Datum using Starfix Geodetic Calculator.
Table 2.2: Test Coordinate Computation

Geodetic System WGS84 Nahrwan
Latitude 26° 33' 26.779" N 26° 33' 20.470" N
Longitude 51° 58’ 04.162" E 51° 58' 00.450" E
Spheroidal Height -18.17 m 10.000 m
Easting UTM 596 398.53 m 596 300.03 m
Northing UTM 2 937 783.07 m 2 937 350.15 m
Refer to MOQ SS-10-02-00 Rev 5.1.pdf
The following screen grab shows the results of the test computation:
Figure 2.1: Results of the test coordinate computation

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
3. ESTABLISHEMENT OF CONTROL STATION

Control station RBM5 was previously established at Ras Laffan Port during the mobilisation of vessel
Halul-41 under Fugro Project No. PSFQ02. Control station RBM5 and associated control points were
included in the traverse network. Additionally, two new control stations, PCBQ191 and PCBQ192, were
observed by GPS static observations and was used as traverse network baseline. These new stations
were included in the traverse network which was close to the DPV Allianz Zeus alongside in Berth 8,
Ras Laffan Port. The baseline used (PCBQ191 and PCBQ192) for the DGPS calibration was verified by
sun azimuth observation and compared against the traverse derived values. The descriptions of control
points RBM5, PCBQ191, PCBQ192 and Auspos processed results are included in Appendix A- Station
Controls.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
4. DPV ALLIANZ ZEUS AND ROV PANTHER XT 965
4.1 Gyrocompass and Motion Sensor Alignment Checks
4.1.1 Vessel Gyrocompass Alignment Checks

Two TSS Meridian Surveyor gyrocompasses were installed on the bridge of the DPV Allianz Zeus to
provide a heading reference for the survey system. The gyrocompasses were secured under the online
survey desk. They were labelled Gyro 1 and Gyro 2, and are referred to as such in the Starfix.Seis online
system. The interface cables from the gyrocompasses were also labelled to avoid any confusion.
Port Gyro 1 is Meridian Surveyor S/N 2698
Starboard Gyro 2 is Meridian Surveyor S/N 8153
For the duration of the calibration, the gyrocompass latitude was set to correspond with the calibration
position (26° North) and the gyrocompass speed was set to zero.
The alignment corrections shown in Table 4.1 are the corrections derived by determining the bearing of
the ship’s centreline, whilst the vessel was moored alongside Berth 8 in Ras Laffan Port, Qatar.
Total Station observations were undertaken between 06:40 and 07:40 on 14 May 2016. Heading data
from both gyrocompasses were simultaneously logged in Starfix.Seis during this period.
The alignment correction was derived as the mean difference between the true vessel heading and the
gyrocompass observations. The final mean corrections applied to the gyrocompasses were -0.79°T
(Port Gyro) and 0.18°T (Starboard Gyro).
All alignment correction factors were approved by Fugro prior to start of survey works.
Table 4.1: Results of Vessel Gyrocompass Alignment Check

Gyrocompass C-O (°) Standard Deviation
Port Gyro -0.79 0.06
Starboard Gyro 0.18 0.06
Gyrocompass alignment results are included in Appendix B - Gyro Cal.
4.1.2 ROV Gyrocompass Alignment Check

On 15 May 2016, the ROV Octans gyrocompass alignment check was performed while the vessel was
alongside Berth 8 in Ras Laffan Port. The Octans gyrocompass was fixed to the ROV in its defined
location and the misalignment between the LARS and the ROV was calculated. Data from the vessel
and ROV gyrocompasses were logged simultaneously for one hour to derive the C-O. The calculated
C-O for the ROV gyrocompass is given below:

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Table 4.2: Results of ROV Gyro Alignment Check

Observations
Gyrocompass Vessel Gyro Heading (°) ROV Gyro Heading (°) C-O SD
Octans Gyro 143.47 233.51 0.76 0.02
4.2 Vessel and ROV Offset Measurements
4.2.1 Offset Measurements - DPV Allianz Zeus and ROV Panther XT 965
A Total Station was deployed to measure the vessel and its survey sensor offsets. A measuring tape
was also deployed to measure and cross-check the offsets of the ROV Panther XT 965 instrument
locations. The following table summarises the results:
Table 4.3: DPV Allianz Zeus Offsets

COG / CRP 00.00 00.00 00.00
GPS_Port -4.35 12.50 16.39
GPS Stbd 4.51 12.49 16.39
Stern 0.00 -32.51 0.00
GAPS USBL 3.10 1.48 -7.34
Crane 1 -5.17 -16.49 0.00
Crane 2 2.87 5.66 5.70
MBES -1.66 1.45 -6.49
Seatex MRU -1.66 1.56 -1.02
ROV Launch 8.00 -6.37 0.00
Table 4.4: ROV ‘Panther XT 965’ Offsets

CRP / Focal Point 00.00 00.00 00.00
Beacon Aft 0.00 -2.39 1.20
Altimeter-1 0.36 -1.83 0.20
Altimeter-2 0.36 -1.93 0.20
Camera Port -0.11 -0.35 0.70
Camera Stbd 0.11 -0.35 0.70
Octans Gyro 0.00 -2.08 0.30
Depth Sensor -0.41 -1.49 0.25
The DPV Allianz Zeus traverse report is included in Appendix A – Station Controls.
Offset diagrams for the vessel and ROV are presented below.

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.1: Offset diagram – DPV Allianz Zeus

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.2: Offset diagram - ROV Panther XT 965

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
4.3 Position Systems Verifications

Whilst mobilizing at Ras Laffan Port in Qatar, DGPS health checks were conducted using a Total Station
system to observe prism targets on the GPS antenna. The GPS positioning system verification was
undertaken between 06:40 to 07:40 on 14 May 2016. With this method, both the GPS Port and GPS
Starboard antennae positions were verified.
Whilst vessel waiting on weather at Ras Laffan Port in Qatar, Vessel offset verifications were conducted
on 25 May 2016, using a Total Station system to observe prism targets on the offset location MBES
Pole and USBL GAPS Pole. The results of the offset verifications were tabulated below:
The following tables summarise the results of the Starfix.G2 GNSS, Starfix.XP GPS and Offset positions
that were verified against the control stations established in Ras Laffan Port.
Calculated Antenna Position Observed DGPS Position

GPS
Easting [m] Northing [m] Easting [m] Northing [m]
GPS Port G2 559 716.68 2 866 766.62 559 716.56 2 866 766.57
GPS Stbd G2 559 721.89 2 866 759.45 559 721.77 2 866 759.36
GPS Port XP 559 716.68 2 866 766.62 559 716.52 2 866 766.57
GPS Stbd XP 559 721.89 2 866 759.45 559 721.79 2 866 759.37

GPS Δ Easting [m] Δ Northing [m] SD Easting SD Northing
GPS Port G2 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.02
GPS Stbd G2 0.12 0.09 0.02 0.02
GPS Port XP 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.02
GPS Stbd XP 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.02
Table 4.7: Results of Offset Verifications

Survey Pole Δ Easting [m] Δ Northing [m] SD Easting SD Northing
MBES 0.14 -0.09 0.02 0.04
USBL (GAPS) 0.08 -0.09 0.02 0.05
Offset verification results are included in Appendix C - Position Verification.
4.4 CTDS Cast
4.4.1 TSDIP at Ras Laffan Port and NNE Well Head Location
On 13 May 2016, a TSDIP was conducted in Ras Laffan Port to wet test the equipment and also to
check the functionality of the USBL beacons.
On 15 May 2016, prior to conducting the GAPS verification at the NNE well head, a TSDIP was
performed close to the verification survey area. A water depth of 64 m was recorded by the TSDIP and

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
an average sound velocity of 1537.16 m/s was derived. The acquired data (profile) was entered in to
the GAPS USBL system.
On 21 May 2016, while waiting on weather, both TSDIP sensors were deployed and the results
compared while the vessel was alongside in Ras Laffan Port. The average velocity of both sensors was
derived to be 1552.3 m/s. Both profiles matched and the results are presented in Figure 4.5.
Table 4.8: Acoustic Velocity Results

Clarke 1880 (modified) Spheroid, Nahrwan 1967 Datum, UTM Projection, Zone 39 N, CM 51° E
Average Seabed Maximum
Date Time Easting Northing
Speed of Speed of Water
(UTC) m m
Sound m/s Sound m/s Depth
13-05-2016 07:30 1554.08 1553.64 13.7 565 734 2 864 092
15-05-2016 20:50 1537.16 1529.14 64.0 601 210 2 943 334
21-05-2016* 04:40 1552.31 1552.38 10.6 560 158 2 866 979
21-05-2016** 04:45 1552.22 1552.34 10.6 560 158 2 866 979
* Valeport 602 s/n 19777
** Valeport 602 s/n 28472
TSDIP results are included in Appendix D – VELOCITY PROFILES

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.3: PCBQ019_001_201605130730_SVP cast report smooth

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.4: PCBQ019_002_201605152050_SVP cast report smooth

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.5: SVP Profile 1 cast report for sensor comparison in Ras Laffan Port

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 4.6: SVP Profile 2 cast report for sensor comparison in Ras Laffan Port

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
5. WELL HEAD GAPS POSITION VERIFICATION
5.1 NNE Well Head GAPS Verification

The ROV was deployed at the NNE well head at 01:05 on 16 May 2016. Positional fixes of the ROV
CRP Position were logged on four of the quadrants of the well head in both clockwise and anticlockwise
directions. The results of which can be seen below.
Table 5.1: NNE Well Head Location

GAPS Verification Point
Longitude
Point Latitude (N) Easting [m] Northing [m]
(E)
26° 36’ 52° 01’
NNE Disposal Well Head 601 228.32 2 943 350.81
34.26” 00.27”
Source: PCBQ019_ Rev 1 Procedure
The results of the position verification at NNE disposal well head are presented below:
Table 5.2: Results of Position Verification at NNE Disposal Well Head

ROV Fix ROV Fix NNE NNE Delta E Delta N
Vessel Heading
Easting [m] Northing [m] E [m] N [m] [m] [m]
Clockwise 601 228.9 2 943 351.3 601 228.3 2 943 350.8 0.61 0.48
Counter
601 229.2 2 943 351.8 601 228.3 2 943 350.8 0.83 1.01
clockwise
Mean 601 229.0 2 943 351.6 601 228.3 2 943 350.8 0.72 0.74
Detailed position results are included in Appendix E - GAPS USBL Verification

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Figure 5.1: Intersection of fixes at the NNE well head location

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
6. SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Seis Configuration Summary is included in Appendix F - Seis Configuration Summary

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
APPENDICES
A. CONTROL STATIONS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendices

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
A. CONTROL STATIONS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix A

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix B

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix C

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix D

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix E

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019-FR01 (Rev 01) Appendix F

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
C. TIDAL DATA
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix C

Fugro Survey (Middle East) Ltd.
TIDAL CURVE
1.6
Observed Tide
1.4
1.2
1.0
Height (m)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
14/05/2016 04:48 15/05/2016 04:48 16/05/2016 04:48 17/05/2016 04:48 18/05/2016 04:48 19/05/2016 04:48 20/05/2016 04:48 21/05/2016 04:48
Date and Time

Project: RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEYS
AS-A-B, AS-C-D, AND AS-I-A PLATFORM LOCATION, AL SHAHEEN FIELD, BLOCK 5, STATE OF QATAR
Client: Maersk Oil Qatar AS
Job No: PCBQ019
Observation Details
Location: AL SHAHEEN FIELD
Latitude: 26° 35' N
Longitude 51° 55' E
Time Zone: GMT
Survey Datum LAT
Source: Observed (Client-supplied actual water level observations in Al Shaheen Field)
PCBQ019-Tide Curve.xlsx Tide Curve
MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
D. EQUIPMENT
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix D

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix D.1

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Equipment List – MV Allianz Zeus
Positioning Systems


2x UPS power supply

Other Items
1x Trimble 4700/5800 For Static GPS observations (Mobilisation only)

1x Seatex 5 MRU
2x CTDS probe

Client Supplied IXSEA GAPS USBL with 4 Beacons
SeaBat 7125 Multibeam Echo Sounder system

Depth sensor
Altimeter
IXSea Octans Ti 1000 Submersible Gyrocompass & Motion sensor
FSME / Report No: PCBQ019 Appendix D.1

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1 Appendix D.2

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
FSME / Report No: PCBQ019 Appendix D.2

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
E. CHARTS
Encl. Rev
Chart No. Title Sheet No. Scale
No. No.
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001BD Bathymetry 01 of 01 1:2000 1 0
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001MD Multibeam Sun Illumination Image 01 of 01 1:2000 2 0
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001SD Seabed Features 01 of 01 1:2000 3 0
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001ND Multibeam Hit Count Per Bin Image 01 of 01 1:2000 4 0
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001QD Multibeam Standard Deviation Image 01 of 01 1:2000 5 0
PCBQ019-ASIA-CS001TD Vessel CRP and MBES Tracks 01 of 01 1:2000 6 0
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix E

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
F. SERVICE WARRANTY
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix F

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS
FUGRO
SERVICE WARRANTY
1. This report and the geodetic position interpretation and assessment carried out in connection with the report (together the “Services”)
were compiled and carried out by Fugro for Maersk Oil Qatar AS (the “Client”) in accordance with the terms of the contract. The
Services were performed by Fugro with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by a reasonable positioning survey contractor, at the time
the Services were performed. Further, and in particular, the Services were performed by Fugro taking into account the limits of the scope
of works required by the Client, the time scale involved and the resources, including financial and manpower resources, agreed between
Fugro and the Client.
2. Other than that expressly contained in the contract and in paragraph 1 above, Fugro provides no other representation or warranty
whether express or implied, in relation to the Services.
3. The Services were performed by Fugro exclusively for the purposes of the Client. Fugro is not aware of any interest of or reliance by
any party other than the Client in or on the Services. Unless stated in the contract or report for the Services or expressly provided in
writing, Fugro does not authorise, consent or condone any party other than the Client relying upon the services. Should this report or
any part of this report, or otherwise details of the Services or any part of the services be made known to any such party and such party
relies thereon that party does so wholly at its own and sole risk and Fugro disclaims any liability to such parties. Any such party would
be well advised to seek independent advice from a competent positioning survey contractor/consultant and/or lawyer.
4. It is Fugro’s understanding that this report is to be used for the purpose described in Section 1 - “Introduction and Scope of Work” of the
report. That purpose was a significant factor in determining the scope and level of the Services. Should the purpose for which the report
is used, or the Client’s proposed development or activity change, this report may no longer be valid and any further use of or reliance
upon the report in those circumstances by the Client without Fugro’s review and advice shall be at the Client’s sole and own risk. Should
Fugro be requested to review the report after the date hereof, Fugro shall be entitled to additional payment at the then existing rates or
such other terms as agreed between Fugro and the Client.
5. The passage of time may result in man-made and/or natural changes in site conditions and changes in regulatory or other legal
provisions, technology or economic conditions, which could render the report inaccurate or unreliable. The information and conclusions
contained in this report should not be relied upon if any such changes have taken place and in any event after a period not greater than
two years (or typically six months in the case of seabed features information) from the date of this report or as stated in the report without
the written advice of Fugro. In the absence of such written advice from Fugro, reliance on the report after the specified time period shall
be at the Client’s own and sole risk. Should Fugro be asked to review the report after the specified time period, Fugro shall be entitled
to additional payment at the then existing rate or such other terms as may be agreed upon between Fugro and the Client.
6. The observations and conclusions described in this report are based solely upon the Services which were provided pursuant to the
agreement between the Client and Fugro. Fugro has not performed any observations, investigations, studies or testing not specifically
set out or required by the contract between the Client and Fugro. Fugro is not liable for the existence of any condition, the discovery of
which would require performance of services not otherwise contained in the Services.
7. Where the Services have involved the use of any information provided by third parties or the Client and upon which Fugro was
reasonably entitled to rely then the Services clearly are limited by the accuracy of such information. Unless otherwise stated, Fugro was
not authorised and did not attempt to verify independently the accuracy or completeness of information, documentation or materials
received from the Client or third parties, including laboratories and information services, during the performance of the services. Fugro
is not liable for any inaccurate information or conclusions, the discovery of which inaccuracies required the doing of any act including
the gathering of any information which was not reasonably available to Fugro and including the doing of any independent investigation
of the information provided to Fugro save as otherwise provided in terms of the contract between the Client and Fugro.
Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Appendix F

PCBQ019 - Vol A - AS-A-B (Rev 1)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PCBQ019 - Vol A - AS-A-B (Rev 1)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FUGRO

NAVIGATION AND POSITIONING SURVEY SERVICES

Survey Period: 16 May to 18 May 2016

Fugro Report No.: PCBQ019

MAERSK OIL QATAR AS

NAVIGATION AND POSITIONING SURVEY SERVICES

RIG ENTRY AND DEBRIS CLEARANCE SURVEY

Survey Period: 16 May to 18 May 2016

Report No.: PCBQ019

Prepared for: Maersk Oil Qatar AS

Client Reference: MOQ/20/0624/04/16 – Rig Entry Survey AS-A-B

1 Issued as Final B. Pasupathy D. Duguid M. Lomax 9 June 2016

0 Issued for Client Comment B. Pasupathy D. Duguid M. Lomax 8 June 2016

Rev. Description Prepared Checked Approved Date

Document Issue List:

1 Digital Maersk Oil Qatar AS 9 June 2016

PO Box 43088, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

GENERAL LOCATION DIAGRAM

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page i of xi

SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS

Metallic and Non-metallic Debris:

No pipelines were detected within the survey corridor.

An illustration highlighting as-left metallic and non-metallic debris is presented below.

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page ii of xi

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page iii of xi

Debris As-found Position

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page iv of xi

Debris As-found Position

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page v of xi

Debris As-found Position

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page vi of xi

Debris As-found Position

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page vii of xi

GENERAL LOCATION DIAGRAM 1

SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS II

SURVEY VESSEL, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL 7

HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT 19

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page viii of xi

DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION 20

A. DAILY PROGRESS REPORTS

B. CALIBRATIONS AND VERIFICATIONS

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page ix of xi

TABLES IN THE MAIN TEXT

Table 1.1: Survey Area - AS-A-B Platform 2

FIGURES IN THE MAIN TEXT

Figure 1.1: Survey runline diagram - AS-A-B Platform 4

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page x of xi

IMAGES IN THE MAIN TEXT

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page xi of xi

During this deployment, the project scope was summarised as below:

The Service Warranty in Appendix F outlines the limitations of this report.

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page 1 of 32

Table 1.1: Survey Area - AS-A-B Platform

Survey Line Plan

A survey line plan diagram is presented below in Figure 1.1.

Table 1.2: Survey Tolerances

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page 2 of 32

Table 1.3: Document References

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page 3 of 32

Figure 1.1: Survey runline diagram - AS-A-B Platform

Fugro Document No. PCBQ019 (Rev 1) Page 4 of 32

Table 2.1: Project Geodetic and Projection Parameters

Spheroid: Clarke 1880 (Modified)