IMO Maritime Safety Committee

(MSC 108)

Summary Report
Summary of significant outcomes
Below is a brief overview of some of the significant outcomes from MSC 108:

• Amendments to the IGC Code intended to permit the use of ammonia cargo as fuel were agreed, with
adoption pending and entry into force expected in July 2026. In addition, a circular allowing voluntary
early application of this requirement, subject to flag Administration agreement, is expected to be issued in
December 2024.
• The following amendments to SOLAS were adopted:
– chapter II-1 - emergency towing arrangements on ships other than tankers;
– chapters II-2 and V - including a number of fire protection amendments, and reporting of lost/observed
containers under SOLAS Ch. V;
– chapters II, IV and VI of the LSA Code, including new standards for SOLAS lifejackets, single hook and
fall systems on survival craft, and revised standards for lowering speeds when launching survival craft;
– chapters 7 and 9 of the FSS Code, including specification of fixed water-based fire-extinguishing on ro-
ro passenger ships having weather decks intended for the carriage of vehicles, and applicable test
standards for heat detectors and linear heat detectors;
• Development of a safety regulatory framework for the reduction of GHG using alternative fuels and new
technologies.
• The agreement of the voluntary Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Code is now expected to be later
than anticipated, with the mandatory Code adoption also being delayed.

Introduction
MSC 108 took place from 15 May to 24 May 2024, at the IMO in London. This report provides a summary of the
key outcomes from the meeting which are relevant to Lloyd’s Register’s clients.

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report for MSC 107 and Summary Report for MEPC 80

Decisions of other IMO bodies

MSC 108 noted the outcomes from other IMO bodies, in particular:

• Matters emanating from MSC 107

– Draft MSC-MEPC guidelines for sampling procedures
− MSC 108 recalled that MSC 107 had invited MEPC 81 to concurrently approve the draft MSC-MEPC
circular on guidelines for the sampling of [oil fuel] for determination of compliance with the
revised MARPOL Annex VI and SOLAS chapter II-2 and to decide on the use of the term "oil fuel" or
"fuel oil" in the guidelines.
− Noting that MEPC 81 had approved the draft MSC-MEPC circular on Guidelines for the sampling of
fuel oil for determination of compliance with MARPOL Annex VI and SOLAS chapter II-2, MSC 108
approved the draft MSC-MEPC circular.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 2

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
 – Guidelines on the use of electronic certificates
− MSC 108 recalled that MSC 107 had approved the Guidelines on the use of electronic certificates of
seafarers (MSC.1/Circ.1665), noting that FAL 47 had proposed the development of a joint MSC-FAL
circular on guidelines for the use of electronic certificates.
− MSC 108 noted the following:
– MEPC 81 had agreed that the guidance to be developed should be issued as a joint FAL-LEG-
MEPC-MSC circular, and that, with regard to instruments under its purview, the joint circular
should only address certificates at this stage, namely those listed in the List of certificates
and documents required to be carried on board ships. MEPC 81 also noted that further work
would be required if documents such as electronic record books and electronic bunker
delivery notes were to be included in the scope of the joint guidance at a later stage.
– FAL 48 had approved a new output "Development of joint FAL-LEG-MEPC-MSC guidelines on
electronic certificates" in the provisional agenda for FAL 49, with a target completion year of
2026, and had invited LEG, MSC and MEPC Committees to become associated organs.
– LEG 111 had agreed to inform FAL and MSC that certificates provided in the instruments
under its purview could be addressed in future joint guidelines on electronic certificates and
documents.
− Taking account of the above, MSC 108 agreed to become an associated organ of the new output
"Development of joint FAL-LEG-MEPC-MSC guidelines on electronic certificates" as approved by
FAL 48, subject to the endorsement of C 132, and invited FAL 49 to prepare the joint circular for
consideration at a future MSC.

• Council (C 129)
– Proposal of new output "Digitization of all certifications required under all IMO conventions as well as
all commercial maritime documents in joint collaboration with the relevant international
organizations and industry"
− MSC 108 noted the proposal of document C 129/4(a)/3 and agreed to await the outcome of the
work of relevant Committees, including MSC, relating to digitalisation, to avoid the duplication of
work of the Organisation on digitalisation at this stage.

Adoption of amendments to mandatory instruments

Please note that a full description of the amendments to SOLAS and other mandatory instruments adopted by
MSC 108 are included under the appropriate subject headings in this report.
MSC 108 adopted the following:

• Amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention:

– chapter II-1 of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, including emergency towing arrangements on ships other
than tankers;
– chapters II-2 and V of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, including a number of fire protection amendments,
and reporting of lost/observed containers under SOLAS Ch. V;
– deletion of the footnote under SOLAS regulation IV/1.2 which references the now terminated
Agreement between Canada and the United States of America for Promotion of Safety on the Great Lakes
by means of Radio, 1973. The deletion would not require an amendment to the convention, instead
being issued as a revision to the recently amended resolution MSC.496(105).

• Amendments to IGF Code:

– incorporating a number of consolidations and additional new provisions based on industry gained
experience;

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 3

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
• Amendments to the Grain Code:
– to introduce a new class of loading conditions for special compartments. The amendments clearly
define the loading condition of "specially suitable compartment, partly filled in way of the hatch
opening, with ends untrimmed" and other consequential amendments;

• Amendments to the 2011 ESP Code:

– relating to the approval of thickness measurement firms;

• Amendments to the International Life-Saving Appliance Code

– chapters II, IV and VI of the LSA Code, including new standards for SOLAS lifejackets, single hook and
fall systems on survival craft, and revised standards for lowering speeds when launching survival craft;

• Amendments to the FSS Code

– chapters 7 and 9 of the FSS Code, including specification of fixed water-based fire-extinguishing on ro-
ro passenger ships having weather decks intended for the carriage of vehicles, and applicable test
standards for heat detectors and linear heat detectors;

• Amendments to the IMDG Code

– amended as part of its regular review every two years to take into account new requirements for
existing substances or new substances;

• Amendments to the Performance standard for protective coatings

– the Performance standard for protective coatings for dedicated seawater ballast tanks in all types of
ships and double-side skin spaces of bulk carriers (resolution MSC.215(82));
– the Performance standard for protective coatings for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers (resolution
MSC.288(87));

• Amendments to the Requirements for maintenance, thorough examination, operational testing,

overhaul and repair of lifeboats and rescue boats, launching appliances and release gear (resolution
MSC.402(96))
– amended to include ventilation systems, where fitted, under the items for annual thorough
examination and operational test;

• Amendments to Part A of the Seafarers’ Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code
– amendments to the STCW Code on sexual harassment and sexual assault;

• Amendments to the Annex to the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification

and Watchkeeping for Fishing Vessel Personnel, 1995 (Revised annex to the 1995 STCW-F
Convention)
• Amendments to the Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing Vessel
Personnel Code (STCW-F Code)

Approval of new/amended non-mandatory instruments

Please note that a full description of the new/amended non-mandatory instruments approved by MSC 108 are
included under the appropriate subject headings in this report.

• Amendments to the Revised Recommendation on Testing of Life-saving Appliances (Resolution

MSC.81(70))

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 4

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
• New/Amended MSC Circulars:
– Voluntary early implementation of the amendments to paragraphs 4.2.2 and 8.4.1 to 8.4.3 of the IGF
Code, adopted by resolution MSC.551(108);
– Revised standardized life-saving appliance evaluation and test report forms (personal life-saving
appliances) (MSC.1/Circ.1628/Rev.2);
– Revised unified interpretations of SOLAS chapter II-2 and the FSS and FTP Codes
(MSC.1/Circ.1456/Rev.1);
– Revised emergency response procedures for ships carrying dangerous goods (EmS Guide)
(MSC.1/Circ.1588/Rev.3) (MSC 108/WP.4, annex 19);
– Guidelines for maintenance and repair of protective coatings (MSC.1/Circ.1330/Rev.1);
– Guidelines on procedures for in-service maintenance and repair of coating systems for cargo oil tanks
of crude oil tankers (MSC.1/Circ.1399/Rev.1); and
– Guidelines on the medical examination of fishers (MSC 108/WP.4, annex 22).

Development of a goal-based instrument for Maritime

Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)
MSC 108 continued the development of the non-mandatory goal-based MASS Code. A consolidated draft text
was produced capturing inputs from the Intersessional Correspondence Group and Intersessional Working
Group. This work builds on the key principles for MASS operation previously agreed with additional
consideration of alternative schemes for the safe management of remote operating centres as distinct entities
and technical requirements for remote operating centres and connectivity.

Key actions carried out by the Committee are as follows:

• restructured the draft Code by moving various chapters among the three parts;
• concluded that it was not necessary to include a new chapter in part 2 on ''Verification and Validation'' to
address GBS Tier III (Verification of conformity);
• agreed that the draft Code should apply only to cargo vessels, not to high-speed craft (HSC) cargo ships
and Government vessels on non-commercial service;
• agreed that Remote Operation Management (ROM) concept should be retained as a complementary
alternative to ISM Code scheme of certification for the safe operation management of the Remote
Operations Centre (ROC);
• instructed the HTW Sub-Committee, as a priority, to consider documents relating to the OOW (Officer Of
the Watch) as the sole lookout in periods of darkness during MASS trials, with a view to advising MSC
accordingly;
• considered the current timeline of MSC 109 (December 2024) for completion of the draft Code and
concluded that, based on the work still required, the finalisation and adoption of the non-mandatory
MASS Code should be scheduled for MSC 110 (2025), followed by an experience building phase; and
• taking into account the revised roadmap for the non-mandatory MASS Code, concluded that it would not
be possible to achieve the 2026 adoption deadline for a mandatory MASS Code and, therefore, the earliest
possible entry into force would be 1 January 2032.

The work will continue through an intersessional Correspondence Group reporting verbally to MSC 109
(December 2024) and the MSC/MASS-ISWG and to provide a final report to MSC 110 (2025). The MSC/MASS-
ISWG was re-established to meet from 9 to 13 September 2024.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 5

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Development of a safety regulatory framework to support
the reduction of GHG emissions from ships using new
technologies and alternative fuels
MSC 108 noted the report of the Correspondence Group established at MSC 107 which had developed a list of
alternative fuels and new technologies being considered by industry to support the reduction of GHG
emissions from ships. The Committee also noted the Group had considered technical aspects, hazards/ risks
in using each fuel and technology along with regulatory barriers and gaps in existing regulations preventing
mass deployment of those fuels and technologies.

Key actions carried out by the Committee are as follows:

• further development of the list of alternative fuels and new technologies, as well as the individual
assessment for each entry in the list along with an invitation to interested member States and
international organisations to submit proposals to further update the lists with information not
currently available;
• agreed that crew members serving ships using alternative fuels and new technologies should hold
ship-specific training when joining such a ship to ensure a safe operation, and that they are aware of
the challenges, risks and complexities that these fuels and technologies present in normal and
emergency situations. In this regard, the HTW sub-committee will be informed of the work of the
committee accordingly;
• agreed that there is a need to clarify whether or not the IGF Code applies to ships using gas as fuel
irrespective of flashpoint in addition to low-flashpoint fuels. In this regard the Committee will forward
this matter to CCC 10 (September 2024) to consider and report back to MSC 109 (December 2024);
• agreed that there is not enough information at this stage to make a decision on the applicability of
end-to-end operational risk assessments when using established methodologies (HAZID/HAZOP), and
invited interested parties to submit more information at a future session for further elaboration and
evaluation;
• with regards to the necessity to include plume dispersion modelling for emergency response planning
onboard ships, invited interested parties to submit proposals to CCC 10 for further elaboration in
relation to the work that is already under progress for Ammonia and Hydrogen Interim Guidelines;
• agreed that when preparing emergency response plans, the port community should be informed
about the challenges posed by the use of alternative fuels;
• requested the Secretariat to liaise with ISO on whether there is any relevant work undertaken on the
issue of potential challenges posed by the use of alternative fuels when preparing emergency
response plans, and inform MSC 109 accordingly; and
• agreed to inform all associated organs (CCC, HTW, III, SDC and SSE Sub-Committees) and MEPC on the
progress made.

The work will continue through an intersessional Correspondence Group reporting to MSC 110 (2025) with an
interim verbal report provided to MSC 109 (December 2024).

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 6

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
The Correspondence Group will consider the list, as developed by the Committee, which contains the
following fuels and technologies (noting this list may be expanded as further proposals are submitted):

Alternative Fuel New Technology

Fatty-acid methyl ester (FAME) Fuel Cell Power Installations
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) Fuel Reforming
Pyrolysis fuel Nuclear Power
Methyl/ethyl alcohol fuels Solar Power
Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) Wind Propulsion
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) diesel Lithium-Ion Batteries
Ammonia Supercapacitor energy storage technology
Dimethyl Ether (DME) Other Battery Technologies
Ethane High-Pressure Composite Cylinders
Hydrogen - (compressed, liquid, metal hydride) Metal Hydrides
Methane/Natural Gas (compressed/CNG, Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)
liquefied/LNG)
Propane/Butane (LPG) Wind Assisted Power
Fuel Blends/Mixtures (e.g. hydrogen - natural gas) - Air Lubrication
- Foils / Hydrodynamic Energy Saving Devices
- Low-Friction Antifouling Paints
- Hull Form Optimization
- Optimal Routing
- Propeller Optimization and Propulsion
Improving Devices
- Advanced Waste Heat Recovery
- Ammonia Abatement
- CO2 Abatement - onboard carbon capture and
storage (OCCS, OCCU)
- Methane Abatement
- N2O Abatement
- Onshore Power Supply / Cold Ironing

Revision of Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management

(MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) and identification of next steps
to enhance maritime cybersecurity
MSC 108 approved draft amendments to the 2017 Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management (MSC-
FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The draft amendments will be sent to FAL 49 (March 2025) for their consideration and
approval. If approved by FAL, the amendments will be published as MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.3 and will supersede
the interim guidelines contained in MSC.1/Circ.1526.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 7

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
The amendments include additional key definitions, expansion of the elements of cyber risk management and
additional information on the standards and best practices for implementation of cyber risk management.

MSC 108 invited member States to submit proposals to a future session regarding identification of the next
steps to enhance maritime cybersecurity.

Navigation, communications and search and rescue

(NCSR)
Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report for NCSR 10

MSC 107 considered only urgent matters from NCSR 10. For further information on the items considered by
MSC 107, please see Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report for MSC 107.

MSC 108 considered the report of NCSR 10 and took the following actions:

Adopted: MSC.530(106)/Rev.1 on performance standards for electronic chart display and information
systems (ECDIS)

Approved: SN circular on recognition of ship reporting system in the Pentland Firth (PENTREP)

This will take effect six months after approval.

Approved MSC.1/Circ.1610/Rev.1 on Descriptions of Maritime Services in the context of e-navigation

MSC noted that FAL 48 previously approved amendments to Maritime Service 8 (Vessel shore reporting).

Approved MSC.1/Circ.1310/Rev.2 on Joint IMO/IHO/WMO Manual on Maritime Safety Information

This will be effective from 1 January 2025.

MSC 108 considered the report of NCSR 10 and took the following actions, amongst others:

• MSC did not agree that the IMO needs to develop a formal recognition framework for new terrestrial
GMDSS services, such as NAVDAT, concluding that NAVDAT should not replace NAXTEX and should not be
made mandatory.
• Dissemination of information over multiple recognised mobile satellite services
– MSC 108 took the following actions regarding the mandatory dissemination of MSI and SAR related
information over multiple RMSSs:
− instructed the NCSR sub-committee to prepare draft amendments to the SOLAS Convention,
including any necessary consequential amendments to related instruments, clearly stating the
requirement for dissemination of MSI and SAR related information through all operational RMSSs;
− agreed that MSI should be disseminated through all operational RMSSs with an implementation
date not later than 31 December 2026; urged Member States responsible for the dissemination of
MSI to complete the implementation of the Iridium SafetyCast service as soon as possible; and
invited member States that might experience delays with the implementation of the Iridium
SafetyCast service to provide relevant information to the IMO; and

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 8

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
 − agreed that rescue coordination centres (RCCs) should disseminate SAR related information
through all operational RMSSs, as appropriate, or, alternatively, establish the necessary
arrangements with other certified providers for dissemination of information within the areas for
which the RCC was responsible, taking into account the guidance provided in MSC.1/Circ.1659
and the relevant provisions of SOLAS regulation V/7.
– With regard to the revision of resolutions A.707(17) and A.1001(25), MSC 108 agreed that:
− the review, approval and adoption of the above resolutions should be aligned;
− resolution A.707(17) should remain compatible with, and should not duplicate the requirements
for, ship-to-shore distress and safety communications originating from a maritime mobile station
in ITU-T Recommendation D.90;
− the revision of resolution A.707(17) should apply to all RMSSs used in the GMDSS and would not
address cost issues for information providers at this stage; and
− the use of any new satellite system, including the VHF Data Exchange System (VDES), for use in
the GMDSS, should be recognised by the Organisation in accordance with the applicable
procedures.

• MSC endorsed the action taken by NCSR in approving COMSAR.1/Circ.59/Rev.1 on Guidance for search and
rescue services regarding implementation of autonomous distress tracking (ADT) of aircraft in flight.

Implementation of IMO instruments (III)

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report for III 9

MSC 108 considered the report of III 9 and took the following actions, amongst others:

• Deferred the consideration of the justification for, and decide on the inclusion of, a new output on
"Development of guidelines addressing risks of falls from height" to MSC 109; and
• noted the discussion on the applicability of the Cape Town Agreement of 2012 to existing vessels,
including the impact on the draft Guidance to assist competent authorities in the implementation of the
Cape Town Agreement of 2012, and endorsed the decision of III to continue developing the draft Guidance
on the basis that the Agreement would apply to existing vessels, including the provisions on survey and
certification in section 3 of the draft Guidance, pending consideration of legal advice from the IMO.

Carriage of cargoes and containers (CCC)

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report CCC 9

Mandatory reporting of lost/observed freight containers

Adopted: MSC Resolution on Amendments to SOLAS chapter V/31 and V/32

Following the recurrent loss of containers, and in response to the danger submerged containers pose to
shipping, MSC 108 adopted draft amendments to SOLAS Chapter V in order to make the reporting of lost or
the observance of lost freight containers mandatory through a standardised procedure. In the same context,
MEPC 81 also adopted amendments to Article V of Protocol I of the MARPOL Convention. The Master of any

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 9

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
ship involved in the loss of any number of freight containers is required to report the incident without delay to
both the nearest coastal State, any shipping in the vicinity and to the Flag State.

Implication: Ships' crews will be required to report the loss of any containers to the nearest coastal State, any
shipping in the vicinity and to the Flag State.

Application: The regulations apply to any ship carrying one or more containers or observing a lost container.
The amendments enter into force 1 January 2026.

The International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk

Adopted: MSC Resolution on Amendments to the International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in
Bulk (MSC.23(59))

The Grain Code prescribes three loading conditions for the safe stowage of grain: "filled compartment,
trimmed", a "filled compartment, untrimmed" and a "partly filled compartment". It has been observed that,
in practice, there might be discrepancies such as when grain is filled up to or above the bottom edge of the
hatch end beams, but not to the highest possible level in way of the hatch opening.

MSC 108 adopted draft amendments to the Grain Code to introduce a new class of loading conditions for
special compartments. The amendments clearly define the loading condition of "specially suitable
compartment, partly filled in way of the hatch opening, with ends untrimmed" and other consequential
amendments.

Implication: Owners and operators of ships carrying grain in bulk should take note of new provisions for
loading grain when dealing with "partially filled compartments" and how to calculate the total heeling
moment.

Application: This applies to all cargo ships, including those of less than 500GT, carrying grain in bulk from 1
January 2026.

International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or Other Low-flashpoint

Fuels (IGF Code) - 2026
Adopted: MSC resolution on Amendments to the International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or
Other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code)

MSC 108 adopted amendments to the IGF Code. These amendments incorporate a number of consolidations
and additional new provisions based on industry gained experience.

Implication: The amendments are (but not limited to):

Part A-1
• 4.2.2-Necessary reference addition based on the proposed change to 8.4.2 listed below.
• 5.12.1-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, clarification as to whether the requirement for
“door sill” applies to the outer door (i.e. the door leading to the hazardous area).
• 6.7.3.1.1-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, the proposed changes are to improve the
design requirements for the pressure relief system of the LNG fuel tanks, ensuring that the pressure relief
system is of sufficient capacity when implementing the isolation requirements specified in paragraph
6.7.2.6 and that fuel tanks shall not be bunkered until the full relieving capacity is restored.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 10

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
• 6.9.1.1-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, changes to permit utilisation of more than one
method in order to control the tank pressure and temperature, e.g. by one of the following methods:
.1 reliquefaction of vapours;
.2 thermal oxidation of vapours;
.3 pressure accumulation; or
.4 liquefied gas fuel cooling.
• 7.3.2.1-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, the formula to calculate the thickness of the
piping has been amended to make it clearer.
• 8.4.1 to 8.4.3-Changes aimed at addressing the leaks during bunkering operations at the connection
between the bunker system and the bunkering manifold and aligning the IGF Code to ISO standard
21593:2019. This change has been made available for voluntary early implementation through a draft MSC
Circular.
• 9.3.1-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, fuel supply systems require redundancy and
segregation so a leak or failure in one system doesn't result in an unacceptable loss of power. If there is
leakage or failure, Administrations may accept partial reduction in propulsion capacity from normal.
• 9.4.7-Ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, to require automatic ventilation of the gas supply pipe
between the master valve and the double block and bleed valves, and between the double block and
bleed valves and the consumer, when the master gas fuel valve is automatically shut down.
• 9.4.8-For ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026, “engine” will be replaced by “gas consumer”.
• 9.6-The amendment specifies that the fuel piping referenced is “Gas” fuel piping.
• 9.6.1-Sub-paragraph 1 includes a requirement for purging high pressure systems when the master gas
valve is closed. This requirement is not included for low pressure systems. As there is no justification for
having the difference, this was deleted.
• 9.8.1, 9.8.2, 9.8.4-Changes in determining design pressure of pipes and ducts. Applicable to ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026.
• 11.3.1-The fuel preparation room shall, for the purpose of the application of SOLAS regulation II-2/9, be
regarded as a machinery space of category A. Applicable to ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026.
• 11.6.2-One portable dry powder fire extinguisher of at least 5kg is to be located in the fuel preparation
room. For ships constructed before 1 January 2026, this shall be provided not later than the first survey on
or after 1 January 2026.
• 12.5.1-Interbarrier spaces to be considered as Hazardous area zone 0. Applicable to ships constructed on
or after 1 January 2026.
• 12.5.2.1-Interbarrier spaces are to be removed from Hazardous area zone 1. Applicable to ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026.
• 15.4.1.3-Since the requirements for the liquid level gauging in the IGF Code should be more in line with the
IGC Code, additionally to 15.4.1.3.1 and 15.4.1.3.2, liquefied gas fuel tank liquid level gauges may also be
closed devices which penetrate the liquefied gas fuel tank, but which form part of a closed system and
keep the gas fuel from being released. Such devices shall be considered as tank connections. If the closed
gauging device is not mounted directly onto the tank, it shall be provided with a shutoff valve located as
close as possible to the tank. Applicable to ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026.
• 18.4.1.1.1-Introduction of “compatibility of maximum possible delivery pressure and vessel's bunkering
line design pressure” as an additional item to agree in writing before any bunkering operation
commences.

Application: The application of the amendments are included under each item. In general, they will apply to
ships constructed after 1 January 2026 which use low-flashpoint fuel, other than ships covered by the IGC
Code. Otherwise they apply to all ships. Where there is no indication above of the application to ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026, these requirements are expected to apply from 1 January 2026 to
existing ships.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 11

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Approved: MSC Circular on Voluntary early implementation of the amendments to paragraphs 4.2.2 and
8.4.1 to 8.4.3 of the IGF Code, adopted by resolution MSC.551(108)

MSC 108 adopted amendments to the IGF Code, including paragraphs 4.2.2 and 8.4.1 to 8.4.3. These
amendments relate to risk assessment and bunkering manifolds and enter into force on 1 January 2026.

In adopting the amendments to paragraphs 4.2.2 and 8.4.1 to 8.4.3 of the IGF Code, MSC, issued a circular
inviting voluntary early implementation prior to the 1 January 2026 entry into force date, subject to the
agreement of the flag Administration.

International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code

Adopted: MSC resolution on Amendments to the IMDG Code

The IMDG Code is regularly reviewed to take into account new requirements for existing substances or new
substances. These amendments are published as Amendment 42-24 and will be included in the 2024 Edition.

Implication: The revisions add new amendment to the Code and new and/or revised requirements for both
new and existing substances.

Such amendments include (but are not limited to):

• Changes to the definition for "Recycled plastics material"

• New definition for "Degree of filling"
• Amendments to “Classification of articles as articles containing dangerous goods N.O.S.”
• New definition for "Explosive or pyrotechnic effect"
• New definition for "Metal powders"
• Amendments to the table under "List of currently assigned organic peroxides in packagings" in the entry
for "DI-2,4-DICHLOROBENZOYL PEROXIDE"
• New entries: DIBENZOYL PEROXIDE, 2,5-DIMETHYL-2,5-DI-(tert-BUTYLPEROXY) HEXANE, METHYL ETHYL
KETONE PEROXIDE(S)
• New section in Chapter 2.9.2 Assignment to class 9 - introducing "Sodium ion batteries"
• Pharmaceutical products (such as vaccines) that are packed in a form ready to be administered, including
those in clinical trials, and that contain GMMOs or GMOs are not subject to this Code.
• Amendments to Chapter 3.2 - Dangerous Goods List
• Amendments to Chapter 3.3 - Special provisions applicable to certain substances, materials or articles
• Amendments to Chapter 4.1 - Use of packaging, including intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) and large
packaging
• Amendments to 4.1.6 Special packing provisions for goods of class 2
• Amendments to Chapter 4.2 - Use of portable tanks and multiple-element gas containers (MEGCs)
• Amendments to Chapter 5.2 - Marking and labelling of packages including IBCs
• Amendments to Chapter 5.3 - Placarding and marking of cargo transport units and bulk containers
• Amendments to Chapter 5.5 - Special provisions
• Amendments to Chapter 6.1 - Provisions for the construction and testing of packaging (other than for class
6.2 substances)
• Amendments to Chapter 6.2 - Provisions for the construction and testing of pressure receptacles, aerosol
dispensers, small receptacles containing gas (gas cartridges) and fuel cell cartridges containing liquefied
flammable gas
• Amendments to Chapter 6.5 - Provisions for the construction and testing of intermediate bulk containers
(IBCs)
• Amendments to Chapter 6.6 - Provisions for the construction and testing of large packaging

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 12

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
• Amendments to Chapter 6.7 - Provisions for the design, construction, inspection and testing of portable
tanks and multiple-element gas containers (MEGCs)
• Amendments to Chapter 6.10 - Provisions for the design, construction, inspection and testing of portable
tanks with shells made of fibre-reinforced plastics (FRP) materials
• New entries in Appendix B - Glossary of terms

Application: These amendments to the IMDG Code apply to all ships (including cargo ships of less than 500GT)
that carry dangerous goods in packaged form from 1 January 2026. They can be applied, in whole or in part,
on a voluntarily basis from 1 January 2025, subject to the agreement of the flag Administration.

International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or Other Low-flashpoint

Fuels (IGF Code) - 2028
Approved: Draft MSC resolution on Amendments to the International Code of Safety for Ships Using
Gases or Other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code)

The IGF Code is reviewed regularly. In this regard, MSC 108 approved amendments incorporating a number of
consolidations and additional new provisions based on industry experience. The amendments are expected to
be adopted at MSC 109 (December 2024) with an expected entry into force date of 1 January 2028.

Implications:

Owners and Operators of Ships using natural gas as fuel should be aware that from 1 January 2028:

• Vessels are permitted to have a suction well installed in fuel tanks protruding below the fuel tank without
the well being considered part of the fuel tank in the context of damage requirements below the fuel tank.
• Fuel tanks must be segregated from cargo in accordance with the requirements of the IMDG Code where
fuel tanks are regarded as bulk packaging, and a fuel tank on the open deck will be considered as a class
2.1 package in the context of the IMDG Code.

Designers of ships intending to use natural gas as fuel constructed on or after 1 January 2028, and potential
owners of the same should be aware of the following:

• Pressure relief valves discharging liquid or gas from piping systems must discharge into fuel tanks
whenever the tank maximum allowable relief valve setting pressure is lower than the setting of the
pressure relief valves fitted at fuel tank inlets and shall be designed to ensure that the required discharge
capacity is met. Alternatively, they may discharge to the vent mast, if means are provided to detect and
dispose of any liquid that may flow into the vent system.
• Fuel tank inlets from safety relief valve discharge lines, protecting the piping system shall be provided with
non-return valves in lieu of valves that are automatically operated when the safety system is activated.
Safe means for tank isolation during maintenance shall be available without affecting proper operation of
safety relief valves.
• For the purposes of SOLAS regulation II-2/9 machinery spaces will be considered as fuel preparation
rooms as opposed to any space containing equipment for the fuel preparation.
• An Administration may allow a non-A-60 boundary to be installed facing the fuel tank on the open deck
which is separated by a minimum distance through heat analysis to provide protection equivalent to an A-
60 class division as well as intermediate structures providing heat protection will be accepted.
• For oil tankers and chemical tankers, A-60 insulation, required by SOLAS regulation II-2/9.2.4.2.5, shall be
considered to meet the requirements regarding A-60 boundary provisions provided that the fuel tank is
located in the cargo area forward of accommodation spaces, service spaces, control stations, escape

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 13

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
 routes and machinery spaces. Consideration for the protection of accommodation block sides may be
necessary.
• Notwithstanding the requirements for A-60 boundaries in the Code, where no source of gas release from
the fuel containment system is considered possible, e.g. a type C tank in which tank connections are in a
tank connection space, A-60 class shielding is not required.
• The existing provision for the fuel storage hold space surrounding a type C tank to be considered a
cofferdam, in the context of protecting the fuel containment system from machinery spaces or other
rooms with high fire risk are changed so that the hold space, can only be considered a cofferdam when the
minimum distance to the A-60 boundary from the outer surface of the insulation system of type C tank or
the boundary of the tank connection space, if any, is not less than 900mm. In this context, for the vacuum
insulated type C tank, outer surface of the insulation system means outer surface of the outer shell.
• Hazardous areas zone 1 will not include fuel preparation room ventilation outlets and instead include
ventilation outlets from zone 1 spaces.
• The following area will be designated as a Hazardous area zone 1, areas on open deck, or semi-enclosed
spaces on open deck above and in the vicinity of fuel tank vent mast outlet within a vertical cylinder of
unlimited height and 6m radius centred upon the centre of the outlet, and within a hemisphere of 6m
radius below the outlet. Where due to the size and layout of the vessel it is not possible to maintain the
above distances, a reduced zone can be accepted based on a dispersion analysis, based on 50% LEL
criteria. The zone dimensions shall never be less than 3m, and application shall include a surrounding
zone 2 hazardous area of 1.5m.
• In lieu of areas within 1.5m surrounding open of semi-enclosed spaces, Hazardous area zone 2 includes
spaces 4m beyond the cylinder and 4m beyond the hemisphere defined in the above hazardous area zone
1 area surrounding fuel tank vent masts on open or semi enclosed deck spaces.
• Where the ventilation ducts serving hazardous spaces pass through less hazardous spaces, the ducts shall
be gas-tight and have under-pressure relative to less hazardous or non-hazardous spaces. Ventilation
pipes serving hazardous spaces that pass through non-hazardous spaces, and that are fully welded and
designed in accordance with the requirements for materials section of the Code, are acceptable without
the need for under-pressure.

Application: The application is highlighted in the implication section above. For the implications that apply to
ships constructed on or after 1 January 2028, this means:

• For which the building contract is placed on or after 1 January 2028; or

• In the absence of a building contract, the keels of which are laid or which are at a similar stage of
construction on or after 1 July 2028; or
• The delivery of which is on or after 1 January 2032.

The IGF Code applies to cargo ships of 500GT and above and to all passenger ships using gas or other low-
flashpoint fuels which are not gas carriers. The amendments highlighted in the Implications section above
apply specifically to cargo ships of 500GT and above and to all passenger ships using natural gas as fuel which
are not gas carriers.

Use of ammonia cargo as fuel

MSC 108 recalled that draft amendments to the IGC Code should be finalised at CCC 10, with a view to
approval at MSC 109 (December 2024) and subsequent adoption at MSC 110, with an expected entry into force
of 1 January 2028. In this regard, MSC 108 considered proposals to move forward the timeline for entry into
force of the draft amendment to paragraph 16.9.2 of the IGC Code through approval of the draft amendment
at this session and adoption at MSC 109; for earlier entry into force of the amendment (1 July 2026). The
proposals aim to address the current prohibition in the IGC Code on the use of ammonia cargo as fuel.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 14

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
MSC 108 approved draft amendments to the IGC Code, with a view to adoption at MSC 109, and entry into
force on 1 July 2026, together with an MSC circular on the early implementation of the draft amendments to
be issued at MSC 109. As an alternative to an MSC circular, MSC 109 could consider including an invitation for
early implementation in the resolution containing the aforementioned amendments.

International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying

Liquified Gases in Bulk (IGC Code)
Approved: MSC circular on Revised Guidelines on the Application of High Manganese Austenitic Steel for
Cryogenic Service (MSC.1/Circ.1599/Rev.3)

MSC 108 approved the revised guidelines containing modifications to the application requirements and
appendix 2. This circular supersedes MSC.1/Circ.1599/Rev.2.

Approved: MSC circular on Revised Guidelines for the Acceptance of Alternative Metallic Materials for
Cryogenic Service in Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk and Ships Using Gases or Other Low-
flashpoint Fuels (MSC.1/Circ.1622/Rev.1)

MSC 108 approved the revised guidelines incorporating the amendments in MSC.1/Circ.1648; and providing
detailed guidance on how to document alternative metallic materials for their suitability and compliance with
the IGC and IGF Codes, and a framework for evaluation and approval of alternative metallic materials for
cryogenic service. This circular supersedes MSC.1/Circ.1622 and revokes MSC.1/Circ.1648.

Approved: MSC circular on Interim Guidelines for use of LPG Cargo as Fuel

MSC 108 approved the interim guidelines providing guidance for safe use of LPG cargo as fuel in relation to the
IGC Code.

Revised Interim Recommendations for Carriage of Liquified Hydrogen in Bulk

(MSC.420(97))
Adopted: MSC resolution on Revised Interim Recommendations for Carriage of Liquefied Hydrogen in
Bulk

With the rapid development of the global hydrogen industry, there is a promising outlook for the carriage of
liquid hydrogen. The interim recommendations for the transportation of liquefied hydrogen in bulk
(MSC.420(97)), have been developed for the research into and demonstration of safe long-distance overseas
carriage of liquefied hydrogen in bulk. Currently the recommendations stipulate the use of vacuum insulation
within the liquid hydrogen containment system. However, as the size of the containment system grows, the
structural strength requirements of a vacuum vessel become a significant challenge. Hence, to facilitate the
implementation of large-scale liquid hydrogen cargo enclosures aboard ships, proposals were made to
introduce a novel containment system design without the use of vacuum insulation.

The Revised Interim Recommendations for Carriage of Liquified Hydrogen in Bulk were adopted at MSC 108
and specify the safety requirements for such new types of cargo containment systems. Their structure is as
follows:

• Part A: General (applicable to ships with any type of cargo containment system);
• Part B: Cargo containment systems of independent cargo tanks using vacuum insulation; and

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 15

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
• Part C: Cargo containment systems of independent cargo tanks using insulation materials and hydrogen
gas in the inner insulation spaces.

This resolution revokes MSC.420(97).

Ship design and construction (SDC)

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report SDC 10

Modifications to Procedures for approval and certification of a firm engaged in

thickness measurement of hull structures (ESP Code)
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of
Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code)

MSC 108 adopted draft amendments to the 2011 ESP Code relating to the approval of thickness measurement
firms. The amendments will better specify that Administrations can exercise the right to audit a firm
conducting thickness measurement of hull structures. The current text in the ESP Code was observed to be
unclear on this matter.

Implication: The impact of the proposed changes should be minimal and affect those Administrations which
might want to certify a firm for thickness measurement.

Application: This specific amendment should affect Administrations engaged in approval of firms conducting
thickness measurement of the hull structures of bulk carriers and oil tankers of 500GT and above.

Emergency towing arrangements and procedures for new ships, other than
tankers, of 20,000GT and over
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to SOLAS regulation II-1/3-4

MSC 108 adopted a revision to SOLAS chapter II-1, regulation 3-4 to extend the scope of the requirements for
emergency towing arrangements fitted on new ships other than tankers of not less than 20,000GT.

Application: Emergency towing arrangements are to be fitted on ships - other than tankers - of 20,000GT and
above, constructed on or after 1 January 2028.

Clients should note that new ships will need to be fitted with towing arrangements which must, at all times, be
capable of rapid deployment in the absence of main power on the ship and have adequate strength based on
the size of the ship and the expected forces during bad weather conditions. The design and construction and
prototype testing of emergency towing arrangements must be approved by the Administration or their
Recognised Organisations.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 16

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Performance standard for protective coatings
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to MSC.215(82) Performance Standard for Protective Coatings
for Dedicated Seawater Ballast Tanks in all Types of Ships and Double-Side Skin Spaces of Bulk Carriers
and MSC.288(87) Performance Standard for Protective Coatings for Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers

MSC 108 adopted amendments to MSC.215(82) and MSC.288(87) to include minor corrections accounting for
the updated descriptive naming conventions for coating inspector certifications. The entry into force date for
amendments to MSC.215(82) and MSC.288(87) is 1 January 2026.

Approved: Guidelines for maintenance and repair of protective coatings (MSC.1/Circ.1330/Rev.1)

Approved: Guidelines on procedures for in-service maintenance and repair of coating systems for cargo
oil tanks of crude oil tankers (MSC.1/Circ.1399/Rev.1)

MSC 108 also approved consequential amendments to MSC.1/Circ.1330 and MSC.1/Circ.1399 to include minor
corrections accounting for the updated descriptive naming conventions for coating inspector certifications.

MSC 108 approved the following:

MSC circular on Revised guidelines on alternative design and arrangements for SOLAS chapters II-1 and
III (MSC.1/Circ.1212/Rev.1)

MSC circular on Unified interpretations of the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships (resolution
MSC.337(91)) - Draft MSC.1/Circ.1509/Rev.1

MSC circular on Unified interpretations of SOLAS chapters II-1 and XII; the technical provisions for
means of access for inspections (resolution MSC.158(78)); and the performance standards for water
level detectors on ships subject to SOLAS regulations II-1/25, II-1/25-1 and XII/12 (resolution
MSC.188(79)/Rev.2) - amendments to MSC.1/Circ.1572/Rev.1

MSC circular on Unified interpretations of SOLAS XV/5.1 and paragraph 3.5 of part 1 of the IP Code on the
harmonization of the Industrial Personnel Safety Certificate with SOLAS safety certificates

MSC circular on Unified interpretations of SOLAS regulations II-2/9 (Containment of Fire) and II-2/13
(Means of Escape) - MSC.1/Circ.1511/Rev.1

Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report HTW 10

Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the Seafarers Training and Certification (STCW) Code

The Joint ILO/IMO Tripartite Working Group to identify and address seafarers’ issues and the human element
recognised the need to tackle bullying and harassment in the maritime sector, including sexual assault and
sexual harassment, with the objective of ensuring a safe workplace for seafarers. It has been agreed that there
will be a new competence developed in the STCW Code on the prevention and response to bullying and
harassment including sexual assault and sexual harassment.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 17

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
MSC 108 adopted amendments to table A-VI/1-4 of the STCW Code to prevent and respond to bullying and
harassment, including sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH).

Implication: Seafarers are likely to need to undertake specific training to be considered as competent.

Application: All seafarers from 1 January 2026.

Adopted: Draft MSC resolution on the revised International Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing Vessel Personnel, 1995 (Revised annex to the 1995 STCW-F
Convention)

MSC 108 adopted draft revisions to the 1995 STCW-F Convention.

The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing Vessel
Personnel (STCW-F), sets certification and minimum training requirements for crews of seagoing fishing
vessels with the aim to promote the safety of life at sea and the protection of the marine environment, taking
into account the unique nature of the fishing industry and the working environment.

Implication: Owners of seagoing fishing vessels will need to ensure that personnel serving onboard are
suitably qualified under the STCW-F Convention and Code.

Application: Enters into force 1 January 2026 and applies to personnel serving onboard seagoing fishing
vessels entitled to fly the flag of a Party to the STCW-F Convention

Adopted: MSC resolution on the new Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing
Vessel Personnel (STCW-F) Code

In conjunction with the revised Convention, MSC 108 adopted the new STCW-F Code.

The new STCW-F Code contains mandatory provisions to which specific reference is made in the annex to the
STCW-F Convention. These requirements provide the minimum standards required to be maintained by
Parties in order to give full and complete effect to the Convention. Also included are standards of competence
required to be demonstrated by candidates for the issue and revalidation of certificates of competency under
the provisions of the STCW-F Convention.

Implication: Owners of seagoing fishing vessels will need to ensure that personnel serving onboard are
suitably qualified under the STCW-F Convention and Code.

Application: Applies to personnel serving onboard seagoing fishing vessels entitled to fly the flag of a Party to
the STCW-F Convention.

Development of training for seafarers on ships using alternative fuels

HTW agreed that the development of training provisions for seafarers on ships using alternative fuels should
be separate from the work on the comprehensive review of the STCW Convention and Code. MSC agreed to
include it as an agenda item at HTW 11 as part of the wider MSC work on the development of a safety
regulatory framework to support the reduction of GHG emissions from ships using new technologies and
alternative fuels.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 18

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Fire Protection, Detection and Extinguishing (SSE 9)
Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report for SSE 9

Minimising fires in ro-ro spaces and special category spaces of new and existing
ro-ro passenger ships
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/20

MSC 108 adopted draft amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/20 for ships fitted with vehicle, special category,
open and closed ro-ro spaces and weather decks intended for the carriage of vehicles. The amendments
include, but are not limited to;
• Individually identifiable smoke and heat detector systems, (including linear heat detectors), for open and
closed vehicle ro-ro spaces.
• Fire detection and alarm system requirements for weather decks intended for the carriage vehicles,
including a safety distance from vehicle lanes to accommodation spaces, control stations and normally
occupied service spaces.
• Video monitoring on vehicle spaces, open and closed ro-ro spaces and special category spaces.
• Fixed water-based fire-extinguishing systems to protect weather decks primarily using water monitor(s),
with nozzles being acceptable for areas which monitors cannot cover. Detailed specifications for nozzles
are also included as well as water supply capacity.
• Changes to structural fire protection of ro-ro and special category spaces including the protection from
openings which is extended to include access to embarkation and assembly stations, as well as intakes for
machinery.
• Openings in ro-ro spaces provided with closing devices such as steel A-class ramps and steel A-class doors
should be permitted below survival craft and accommodation spaces (including normally occupied
service spaces and control stations).
• Openings in ro-ro spaces below accommodation spaces, control stations and normally occupied service
spaces are permitted when the fire integrity of the ship’s side, including windows and doors, is A-60 within
a specified rectangular area (A-0 windows protected by a water-based system may be accepted as
equivalent to A-60 windows).

Implication: Equipment installation requirements are updated for both new and existing ships fitted with
vehicle, special category, open and closed ro-ro spaces and weather decks intended for the carriage of
vehicles. Shipyards, equipment manufacturers and owners will need to comply with the new requirements.

Application: The amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/20 apply to ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026,
fitted with vehicle, special category, open and closed ro-ro spaces and weather decks intended for the
carriage of vehicles. Ships constructed before 1 January 2026, including those constructed before 1 July 2012,
shall also comply with regulations adopted by resolution MSC.550(108), as follows:

• SOLAS II-2/20.4.1.6: passenger ships constructed before 1 January 2026, including those constructed
before 1 July 2012, shall comply not later than the first survey on or after 1 January 2028;
• The requirements of paragraphs 4.1.1 through 4.1.4 shall only apply to passenger ships constructed on or
after 1 January 2026. Passenger ships constructed before 1 January 2026, including those constructed
before 1 July 2012, shall comply with the requirements of paragraph 4.1.6 and the previously applicable
requirements of paragraph 4.1. The requirements of paragraph 4.1.5 shall apply to cargo ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026. Cargo ships constructed before 1 January 2026, including those

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 19

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
 constructed before 1 July 2012, shall comply with the previously applicable requirements of paragraph
4.1;
• SOLAS II-2/20.4.4: The requirements of paragraphs 4.4.1 and 4.4.2 apply to ships constructed on or after 1
January 2026. Passenger ships with vehicle, special category or ro-ro spaces constructed before 1 January
2026, including those constructed before 1 July 2012, shall comply with the requirements of paragraphs
4.4.1 and 4.4.2 not later than the first survey on or after 1 January 2028; and
• SOLAS II-2/20.5: Applies to passenger ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026. Passenger ships
constructed before 1 January 2026 shall comply with the previously applicable requirements of paragraph
5.
• SOLAS II-2/20.6: The requirements of paragraphs 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 shall apply to ro-ro passenger ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026. Passenger ships with vehicle, special category or ro-ro spaces
constructed before 1 January 2026, including those constructed before 1 July 2012, shall comply with the
requirements of paragraph 6.2.3 not later than the first survey on or after 1 January 2028.

Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the Fire Safety Systems Code

MSC 108 also adopted the following draft amendments to the FSS Code:

• chapter 7 provides specifications for fixed water-based fire-extinguishing systems on ro-ro passenger
ships fitted with weather decks intended for the carriage of vehicles.
• chapter 9/2.3 (Component requirements) and chapter 9/2.4 (Installation requirements) relate to linear
heat detectors and positioning of detectors for combined smoke and heat detectors.
• chapter 9/2.5 (System control requirements) relate to visual and audible fire signals on ro-ro passenger
ships.

Implication: Shipyards and equipment manufacturers will need to comply with the new requirements.

Application: The amendments to the FSS Code chapter 7 apply to ro-ro passenger ships fitted with weather
decks intended for the carriage of vehicles constructed on or after 1 January 2026.The amendments to the FSS
Code chapter 9/2.3 (Component requirements) and chapter 9/2.4 (Installation requirements) apply to ships
constructed on or after 1 January 2026.The amendments to the FSS Code chapter 9/2.5 (System control
requirements) apply to ro-ro passenger ships constructed on or after 1 January 2026.

Fire protection of control stations on cargo ships

Adopted: MSC Resolution on amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/7.5.5

Approved: MSC.1/Circ.1456/Rev.1 Unified Interpretations of SOLAS chapter II-2 and the FSS and FTP Codes

MSC 108 adopted draft amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/7.5.5 and approved consequential amendments to
MSC.1/Circ.1456 with respect to the protection of control stations and cargo control rooms on cargo ships
where a fire detection and alarm system is required. The revised circular supersedes MSC.1/Circ.1456 and
MSC.1/Circ.1492.

The following text is added to the protection methods in paragraphs 5.5.1, 5.5.2 and 5.5.3: "and in all control
stations and cargo control rooms".

Implication: Shipyards and shipowners will need to comply with the amended SOLAS requirements for
protection of accommodation and service spaces and control stations where a fixed fire detection and alarm
system is required. As a result, control stations and cargo control rooms on new ships will have to comply with
the protection method selected.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 20

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Application: The amendments to SOLAS chapter II-2/7.5.5 are applicable to all new cargo ships of 500GT and
over with keels laid or at a similar stage of construction on or after 1 January 2026. Ships constructed before 1
January 2026 will need to comply with the current requirements of paragraph 5.5.

Life Saving Appliances (SSE 9)

Additional Information
Lloyd’s Register’s Summary Report SSE 9

Ventilation requirements for totally enclosed lifeboats

Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to resolution MSC.402(96) Requirements for maintenance,
thorough examination, operational testing, overhaul and repair of lifeboats and rescue boats, launching
appliances and release gear.

As a consequence of the agreed amendments to the LSA Code and resolution MSC.81(70) with regard to new
ventilation requirements for totally enclosed lifeboats, MSC 108 adopted an amendment to resolution
MSC.402(96). This amendment includes the requirement for the examination and check of the 'ventilation
system, where fitted' for satisfactory condition and operation on lifeboats (including free-fall lifeboats), rescue
boats, and fast rescue boats.

Implication: Totally enclosed lifeboats will need to undergo satisfactory examination and check with regard to
their ventilation systems as per the new requirements detailed in MSC.535(107). It is not expected that
partially enclosed lifeboats, rescue boats and fast rescue boats will be fitted with ventilation systems.

Application: Applies from 1 January 2026, however, given that the new requirements for the ventilation of
totally enclosed lifeboats applies to those installed on ships on or after 1 January 2029, it is not expected to be
required to take place until such totally enclosed lifeboats are installed.

Minimum and maximum lowering speed of survival craft and rescue boats
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the Life-Saving Appliance Code (paragraph 6.1.2.8 &
6.1.2.10)

Approved: MSC resolution on amendments to resolution MSC.81(70) Revised Recommendation on the

testing of life-saving appliances

MSC 108 adopted amendments to paragraphs 6.1.2.8 and 6.1.2.10 of the LSA Code. The new requirements
limit the maximum lowering speed of a fully loaded survival craft or rescue boat to 1.3 m/s, however, the
Administration may approve a different maximum speed, considering factors such as design, occupant safety,
and launching arrangements.

Implication: Equipment manufacturers are to ensure their equipment meets the new requirements which aim
to limit the maximum lowering speed of a fully loaded survival craft or rescue boat to 1.3 m/s. Owners of cargo
ships/ shipyards are to be aware of the new requirements which enter into force on 1 January 2026

There will likely be little impact on passenger ships, as they already adhere to a davit height limitation in
SOLAS regulation III/24.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 21

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Application: The draft amendments enter into force on 1 January 2026. They apply to survival craft and rescue
boats installed on cargo ships of 500GT and over and passenger ships on or after 1 January 2026.

MSC 108 also approved consequential amendments to resolution MSC.81(70) Revised Recommendation on the
testing of life-saving appliances related to requirements for installation tests.

Amendments to the LSA Code and resolution MSC.81(70) to address the in-water
performance of SOLAS lifejackets
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the Life Saving Appliance Code, Chapter II

Approved: MSC resolution on amendments to resolution MSC.81(70) Revised Recommendation on the

testing of life-saving appliances

MSC 108 adopted amendments to the LSA Code chapter 2 and approved consequential amendments to the
Revised Recommendation on the testing of life-saving appliances (MSC.81(70)) to improve the minimum
performance standards for SOLAS lifejackets.

The draft amendments to the Revised Recommendation on the testing of life-saving appliances MSC.81(70)
includes changes to the buoyancy test, shoulder lift test and the righting test.

Implication: Equipment manufacturers: Minimum performance standards for SOLAS adult life jackets will be
enhanced, necessitating potential modifications to life jacket designs to align with the updated standards.
The draft amendments ensure that the lifejacket is designed and tested to turn the body of an unconscious
person to a face-up position where the nose and mouth are both clear of the water.

Ship owners/operators: Adult lifejackets installed on board ships on or after the 1 January 2026 will need to
comply with the new requirements.

Application: The new requirements apply to new SOLAS adult lifejackets carried onboard cargo ships of 500GT
and over and all passenger ships from 1 January 2026.

Approved: MSC.1/Circ.1628/Rev.2 Revised Standardized Life-Saving Appliance Evaluation and Test Report
Forms (Personal Life-Saving Appliances)

MSC 108 also approved consequential amendments to MSC.1/Circ.1628/Rev.1. The revised circular will be
disseminated as MSC.1/Circ.1628/Rev.2 concurrently with the adoption of the associated draft amendments
to the LSA Code.

Amendments to the LSA Code concerning single fall and hook systems with on-
load release capability
Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to the Life Saving Appliance Code paragraphs (4.4.7.6.8 and
4.4.7.6.17)

Lifeboats and rescue boats with single fall and hook systems face a similar risk of potential accidental release
during recovery operations as those with twin fall and hook systems. As these systems are used and tested in
a similar way as twin fall lifeboats, they should have similar safety standards. Having discussed the issue, the
IMO has now finalised draft amendments to paragraphs 4.4.7.6.8 and 4.4.7.6.17 of the LSA Code in order to
ensure adequate safety standards for lifeboats and rescue boats fitted with single fall and hook systems.

MSC 108 adopted amendments to paragraphs 4.4.7.6.8 and 4.4.7.6.17 of the LSA Code to address the issue.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 22

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Implication: Life-saving appliance manufacturers requirements are updated for all new installations of
lifeboats and rescue boats with a single fall and hook system. The draft amendments require that:

• (4.4.7.6.8) to prevent accidental release during recovery of the boat, the hook shall not be able to support
any load unless the hook is completely reset. In the case of a hook which is capable of releasing the
lifeboat or rescue boat with a load on the hook when it is not fully waterborne, the handle or safety pins
shall not be able to be returned to the reset (closed) position, and any indicators shall not indicate the
release mechanism is reset, unless the hook is completely reset; and
• (4.4.7.6.17) where a single hook and fall system is used for launching a lifeboat or rescue boat in
combination with a suitable painter, the requirements of 4.4.7.6 and 4.4.7.6.15 need not be applicable
provided that the single fall and hook system does not have the capability to release the lifeboat or rescue
boat with a load on the hook it is not fully waterborne.

Shipyards and Owners are to be aware of the need to comply with the new requirements once adopted.

Application: The amendments enter into force on 1 January 2026. They apply to lifeboats and rescue boats
installed on cargo ships of 500GT and over and passenger ships on or after 1 January 2026, where a single fall
and hook system is used for launching them.

Development of further measures to enhance the safety of

ships relating to the use of fuel oil
MSC previously agreed that the issue of “fuel oil safety” which is currently regulated in MARPOL Annex VI
should be brought within the purview of the MSC (rather than the MEPC) and possibly incorporated into
SOLAS. MARPOL remains under the auspices of the MEPC, but it is agreed that MSC should take a more robust
stance on the safety issues related to fuel.

Adopted: MSC resolution on amendments to SOLAS regulation II-2/4

MSC 108 adopted amendments adding a new sub-paragraph to SOLAS II-2/4 to ensure that oil fuel delivered
to and used on board ships shall not jeopardise the safety of ships or adversely affect the performance of the
machinery or be harmful to personnel.

Oil fuel suppliers will need to comply with the new requirements and ship managers and crews will need to
ensure that they order oil fuel that is suitable for the ship and not harmful to personnel.

Application: This amendment to SOLAS will enter into force 1 January 2026 and applies to all cargo ships of
500GT and over and to all passenger ships.

Lloyd’s Register Briefing Note – Summary Report MSC 108 Page 23

May 2024 ©Lloyd’s Register 2024
Regulatory Affairs
Lloyd's Register Global Technology Centre,
Hampshire House
Hampshire Corporate Park, Southampton
SO53 3RY, UK

Lloyd’s Register EMEA Lloyd’s Register

e: RegulatoryAffairs@lr.org
w: www.lr.org/imo

To find previous material and to register to receive regular updates on IMO meetings and
developments, please visit https://www.lr.org/imo

This report has been produced and disseminated immediately after the closure of the meeting in
order to provide timely advice to the reader. Consequently we apologise if it has not been fully
proof read to remove grammatical errors. New circular and resolution numbers given here may
be subject to change when IMO publish the final versions.

Lloyd’s Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Copyright © 2024 Lloyd’s Register EMEA (Reg. no. 29592R) is a registered society under the Co-operative and Community
Benefit Societies Act 2014 in England and Wales. Registered office; 71 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 4BS, UK. A member
of the Lloyd’s Register group.

Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, employees or agents are,
individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as ‘Lloyd’s Register’. Lloyd’s Register assumes no responsibility and
shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this
document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the
provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and
conditions set out in that contract.