Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review Team Guidelines, Policies, and Terms
Review Team Guidelines, Policies, and Terms
Dismiss Announcement
OnlineBookClub.org
Preferences
1. Getting Started
2. Important: Requirements while Reading
3. Basic Process For Doing A Review
4. Important: Guidelines For Writing The Review
5. Posting The Completed Review
V. What Happens Next
7. Important: Other Review Team Rules and Terms
Getting Started
It is advised that you read this whole page before selecting a book to
review.
After _rst clicking to accept a review, you will then choose the format in
which you want to receive the book before con_rming. Once con_rmed,
you cannot change the format. It is important to make sure the formats
you set in your preferences and the format you ultimately choose are
compatible with your device.
Throughout the process of reviewing a book, you are required to use the
"Update" tab to update the status of the review within the deadlines.
That is also the link you need to use to submit error reports if you have
trouble doing the review or need to request an extension. Before
agreeing to review a book, you must carefully read the full description
displayed on the Review Team Page to make sure it is a good _t for you.
For paid reviews, the payments usually range from $5-$60, but can
occasionally be more. The higher payments are reserved for the highest
level reviewers, so you will want to also familiarize yourself with the
reviewer score page. Your level only affects what books you can select
to review. If your level goes down while in the middle of reviewing a
book, you are still able to _nish that review (and get paid if it was a paid
review.)
It is very important that you carefully read the book. Do not speed or
skim read. Take notes while you read, so you can use those notes later
when you write the review.
After selecting a book for review, you need to go back to the Review
Team Page to update the status of the review after each of the
following three events, within the listed deadlines:
Within one hour of accepting the book for review, you must con_rm
having successfully downloaded the book in a readable format OR
submit an error report.
Within 14 days of con_rming the successful download, you must
con_rm you have _nished reading it (or submit a different status
update, namely an error report or extension request).
Within 7 days of marking the book as read, you must submit the
review (or submit a different status update, namely an error report
or extension request).
You can always submit an error report on the Update tab. An error
report submitted through the Update tab counts as a status update
and will automatically extend the deadline for the next update by at
least one week.
Emailing Review Team Support does not count as a status update.
If you hate the book so much you don't want to Jnish reading...
If you dislike reading a book a lot, you do not have to _nish reading it.
There is an option you can click on the Review Team Page to say that
you do not want to _nish the book. You will be asked to give a short
paragraph explaining why you didn't like the book enough to _nish
reading it that will be given to the author as constructive criticism.
There is no penalty for occasionally choosing not to _nish a book.
However, if it becomes excessive, it may affect your score. At this time,
failing to complete 30% or more of reviews will lead to a penalty on your
reviewer score.
If you _nish reading the book, you are expected to write a review of it.
We give you a free copy of a book in exchange for a review.
You are expected to rate the book on a scale of 1 to 4 stars with 1 being
the worst and 4 being the best. Use the following guidelines for rating: 1
= bad, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent); basically if you give it a 3 or a 4
you are recommending that others read it, if you give a 1 you are
strongly recommending other people do not bother reading it, and if you
give it a 2 that's sort of ambiguous since obviously you didn't like it that
much but maybe others will. O[cial ratings do not use half-points (e.g.
3.5 stars); rather choose a whole number for the o[cial rating which
must be included in the review and then explain in the review why you
would give or take partial points if that was possible.
The review does not have to be positive. If you didn't like the book (but
still _nished reading it) then give it a bad rating and a generally negative
review. Please be honest. This system won't work unless others can
trust the honesty of our reviews.
Finally, make sure you follow the guidelines for writing the actual review
or your review may be rejected.
Summary of requirements/checklist:
Careful reading
Originality
Brief summary
Book title
Author's name
Positive aspects
Negative aspects
Rating
Justi_cation of rating
Recommendation
Errors
General
1. Read the whole book carefully. Do not skim read or use any
speed reading technique of any kind.
Note: You are required to read the entire book, not just the
sample.
SpeciJc
Length
4. The minimum length is 400 words, or 300 words for children's
books.
5. The maximum length is 800 words.
V. The review must consist of at least _ve paragraphs.
Summary
7. Brieiy summarize the book but, of course, without any spoilers.
The summary is required but must be less than half of the
review. In other words, it must not be the case that most of the
review is summary of the book. The focus of the review needs to
be your opinion of the book and an explanation of why you
recommend others read it or not.
Notes:
1. Make sure that the summary is original and written in
your own words. Do not copy from the book's published
blurbs or descriptions or from other reviews of the book.
Do not lift sentences from the book (these may be
quoted sparingly only with a clear indication of the
source). Using synonyms to replace words in published
summaries of the book is considered plagiarism, which is
absolutely prohibited.
2. Spoilers are not limited to the book's ending. Major plot
twists, such as the death of an important character or the
revelation of a mystery, also constitute spoilers.
10. Support your commentary with speci_c examples from the book
(without spoilers). Do not use generic phrases that could apply
to any book. A review consisting entirely or mostly of clichéd,
boilerplate expressions ("the twists and turns kept me on the
edge of my seat") will be marked as not adhering to the
guidelines.
Notes:
1. The following rating formats are not acceptable: "3/4",
"three stars out of four", "three stars of four stars", "3
stars", and "three stars".
2. Do not use a separate heading, or fragment, for the
rating. Include the rating in the text of the review as a full
sentence.
14. If a book does not seem to have been professionally edited, and
if you _nd more than ten errors, do not give it a perfect four out
of four rating. It is not acceptable to claim a book was
professionally edited and give it four out of four just because an
editor is mentioned in any part of the book. It does not matter
whether the book really was professionally edited or not; what
matters is whether it seems like it to you from reading it.
15. Brieiy explain why you gave the rating you did. For instance, if
you gave three stars, brieiy explain why you didn't give four or
two. Make sure the rating is justi_ed. As an extreme example, if
there is only one error, that cannot be used as the only basis for
deducting one star.
Recommendation
1V. Explain to what kind of people, readers, or audiences you think
the book would most appeal. If there are any speci_c audiences
that you would recommend do not read the book, mention and
explain that as well. Avoid overly general recommendations like
"this book is for everyone".
Notes:
1. Do not write "this book is unsuitable for children" in cases
where it is unlikely that the book could be taken for a
children's book.
2. You are not required to mention sexual and religious
content or profanity unless they are signi_cant to some
other aspect of the review.
Errors
17. You are not required to mention the errors in the book in your
review. You might mention them if they are relevant to the rating,
for example. You may list examples if this supports a particular
point you are making, but this is not required.
Notes:
1. Reporting that the book was exceptionally well edited will
go hand-in-hand with selecting "0 errors - rare" when you
submit the rating and typos.
2. "Professionally edited" does not mean the same as "zero
errors".
3. If you select "0 errors - rare" and there are uncounted
errors listed, you do not need to state that the book was
exceptionally well edited.
Post-review questionnaire
19. You are required to report on profanity, and erotic and religious
content, in the Post-Review Questionnaire. However, this is for
internal use. You do not need to mention this information in the
text of the review. You may mention these aspects if they are
relevant to a required component of the review, normally the
recommendation. For example, it's relevant to say that a book is
suitable for a mature audience because it contains explicit sex
scenes.
Paragraph Formatting
21. Use the form provided to report the number of errors found
while reading (up to 10). When reporting the errors, you must
include the following:
Before attempting to submit the text for the review, make sure you have
properly updated the status on the Update tab of the Review Team Page
. Needless to say, you will not be prompted to submit the text of the
review if you have not yet updated the status from "currently reading" to
"_nished reading". You must always keep the status of the review
properly updated as instructed earlier on this page.
When submitting the rating and private list of typos on the Review Team
Page, you may also be prompted to write an additional short private
blurb. The point of this is solely to demonstrate that you carefully read
the whole book. Generally, the review will not be sent to the moderators
for approval until after the private blurb is con_rmed by the author or
publisher who submitted the book for review. If the author does not
respond within a week, there is a button to request the "dispute" be
closed on the "private blurb dispute" page, accessible from your
Review Team History page. Please allow one more week for the
publisher to respond or for the dispute to be closed automatically.
Keep in mind, not all reviews will require the additional private blurb. If a
private blurb is needed, you will be prompted for a private blurb when
submitting the rating on the update tab.
Please allow three weeks for payment to be issued after the editors and
moderators approve the review.
After you submit the review, it will not be immediately publicly visible.
The review will _rst need to be approved by the editors. This process
can take around two weeks. If a private blurb needs to be approved,
generally the review will not be sent to the editors until after the private
blurb is con_rmed.
The review will be listed in your history. While waiting for the editors'
decision, it will show as "pending". If rejected, it will show as "rejected"
with a link to the editors' comments. If the editors approved it, it will
show as "published". When published, the title and purchase links will
be added to the review by the editor, and the review will be moved by the
editor into the public genre forum. Then what you want to do is share
links to it with your friends via email, Facebook, Twitter and any other
similar networks you use. That will help drive up your reviewer score
(because authors/publishers would rather have their book reviewed by
someone with a bigger audience).
Generally, the editors will not correct errors in the review, whether they
are grammar/spelling errors or other issues. They simply rate the review
and provide some feedback to the reviewer explaining their rating and
coach the reviewer to write even better reviews. Likewise, you will
generally not have the option to update the review to _x mistakes after
it has already been sent to the editors. There are two main reasons for
that:
The _rst review you do will not be paid. This acts as a trial run to make
sure you can write a review that adheres to the Review Team Guidelines
(which is the page you are reading now).
If your _rst review does not adhere to the guidelines, then you may not
be eligible to do paid reviews after that depending on your
Reviewer Score. The biggest factor in your reviewer score is how well
you and your reviews follow and adhere to the Review Team Guidelines.
The other factors such as popularity and participation have much less
of an effect on your reviewer score.
Although you are eligible to do paid reviews after your _rst review
(assuming the _rst review adheres to the guidelines), you will still want
to increase your level and score after that to become eligible for even
higher paying reviews. The highest paying reviews are reserved for level
5 and level 6 reviewers. You can become a level 5 or level 6 reviewer in
as little as three reviews, assuming the reviews adhere to the guidelines,
and assuming you put some reasonable effort into improving the
popularity and participation sections of your Reviewer Score.
OnlineBookClub.org was created over 15 years ago and has over three
million members. It is a FREE site for readers.
SHOW MORE
OnlineBookClub.org Search
SEARCH
M