Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay Content
Essay Content
Essay Content
Two models illustrate the TBL: the commonly accepted nested spheres model (Venn
diagram) and the alternative overlapping spheres model (Russian doll model) criticized
for its lack of hierarchy representation (Getzner, 1999). The latter, suggesting a broader
environmental system, is considered by some scholars as a stronger sustainability model
(Chapman & Eames, 2007; Hosseinian-Far & Jahankhani, 2015).
The economic dimension (Profit) extends beyond financial metrics, considering societal
impacts. It involves managing core competencies, creating shareholder value, and
adopting marketing orientation (Prahalad & Hamel, 1999; Doyle, 2000; Akroush, 2012).
The social dimension (People) addresses an organization's impact on welfare,
encompassing employees and the community. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
initiatives, including education assistance and fair practices, are central (Engardio, 2007).
Implementation of the TBL requires balancing the three pillars, and sustainability
integration into operations and marketing is crucial for organizational success (Gimenez
et al., 2012). Companies face the challenge of finding this balance (Mota et al., 2015).
Measuring sustainability is vital for accountability, with various indexes and frameworks
developed for private and public organizations (Traverso et al., 2010; Adams et al., 2014).
The Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index, Global Reporting Initiative index, and EDIE’s
Sustainability Leaders Awards are examples. Sustainability assessment is considered
essential, with Integrated Sustainability Assessment (ISA) proposed to optimize
outcomes while considering constraints (Farsi et al., 2017).
In conclusion, the TBL has emerged as a basis for organizational performance and
reputation, with the competitive advantage hinging on innovative green products and
socially responsible strategies (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006; Maniatis, 2016). Despite
advancements, challenges persist in implementing and assessing sustainability,
emphasizing the imperative nature of sustainability for future growth (Parry, 2018).