FINANCE UNIVERSITY UNDER THE GOVERNMENT

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS FACULTY

ECONOMIC THEORY DEPARTMENT

THE COURSE WORK

ON THE DISCIPLINE

“INTERNATIONAL CREDIT AND INTERNATIONAL

BANKING”

« The Economic and Financial Analysis of UK Building Societies

»

Written by:
Romanov M.A.
student of IFF 21-2 group

Scientific adviser:
Smirnov V. D

Moscow 2024
 List of Content.

I. Introduction pp. 3-4

II. Historical Background

Origins and Evolution of Building Societies in the UK pp. 5-8
Key Events in the Development of the Sector pp. 8-11

III. Economic Impact of Building Societies

Contribution to the Housing Market pp. 12-13
Stimulating Local Economies pp.13-14
Generating Employment and Regional Development pp. 14-16

IV. Financial Structure and Operations

Capital Structure and Funding Sources pp. 17-19
Asset Composition and Investment Strategies pp. 20-22
Financial Performance Metrics pp. 22-24

V. Comparative Analysis
Comparative Study of Building Societies vs. Banks pp. 25-26
Performance Metrics and Efficiency Ratios pp. 26-29
Risk Management Practices pp. 29-31

VI. Challenges and Opportunities

Current Challenges Facing Building Societies pp. 32-33
Opportunities for Growth and Innovation pp. 33-34

VII. Conclusion pp. 34-35

VIII. List of References p. 36

2
 I. Introduction.

The landscape of financial institutions in the United Kingdom is rich and

diverse, reflecting the nation's dynamic economic history and evolving societal
needs. Among these institutions, building societies stand out as unique entities
that have played a pivotal role in shaping the country's housing market,
economic growth, and financial landscape. This research endeavors to delve
into the economic and financial dimensions of UK building societies, exploring
their historical roots, current operations, and future prospects.
Understanding the origins and evolution of building societies provides crucial
insights into their significance within the UK's financial system. From their
humble beginnings as mutual organizations established to facilitate home
ownership for working-class individuals, building societies have undergone
significant transformations over the centuries. This section will delve into the
historical milestones that have shaped the identity and functions of building
societies, tracing their development from small local entities to key players in
the national housing market. Building societies have long been recognized for
their contributions to the UK economy, particularly in the realm of housing.
Their role in providing affordable mortgage finance has not only enabled
millions of individuals and families to achieve homeownership but has also
stimulated demand in the housing market, driving economic activity at both
local and national levels. Additionally, building societies play a crucial role in
fostering regional development by channeling savings into local investments
and supporting community initiatives. This section will explore the multifaceted
economic impact of building societies, highlighting their role as drivers of
growth and stability.

3
A comprehensive analysis of building societies necessitates an examination of
their financial structure and operational strategies. Central to this inquiry is an
exploration of their capitalization and funding sources, which often differ from
those of traditional banks. Understanding the asset composition and investment
strategies of building societies is also paramount, as it sheds light on their risk
profile and profitability. Moreover, evaluating key financial performance
metrics such as liquidity, solvency, and profitability provides valuable insights
into their resilience and ability to navigate economic challenges. Building
societies operate within a competitive financial landscape alongside traditional
banks, each with its distinct advantages and challenges. This section will
conduct a comparative analysis of building societies and banks, examining their
performance metrics, efficiency ratios, and risk management practices. By
juxtaposing these institutions, we aim to discern the unique strengths and
weaknesses of building societies and identify areas for potential improvement
and innovation.

The final section of this research paper will explore the current challenges
facing building societies and the opportunities that lie ahead. In an era
characterized by rapid technological advancements, regulatory changes, and
shifting consumer preferences, building societies must adapt to remain relevant
and competitive. By identifying key challenges and outlining strategies for
overcoming them, this section aims to provide valuable insights for building
societies seeking to navigate the complexities of the modern financial landscape
and capitalize on emerging opportunities for growth and innovation.

4
 II. Historical Background.
Origins and Evolution of Building Societies in the UK.
The story of building societies in the United Kingdom is one of resilience,
adaptability, and social progress. Born out of the need to provide affordable
housing solutions for the working class during the industrial revolution,
building societies emerged as a cornerstone of the nation's economic and social
fabric. To understand their origins and evolution, it is essential to journey back
to the dawn of the 19th century, a time marked by rapid urbanization,
burgeoning industrialization, and a pressing demand for accessible housing. In
the early 19th century, the Industrial Revolution was in full swing, drawing a
massive influx of people from rural areas to burgeoning urban centers in search
of employment opportunities in factories and mills. This mass migration placed
immense pressure on housing infrastructure, leading to overcrowding,
unsanitary living conditions, and exorbitant rents. The working class,
comprising factory workers, laborers, and artisans, found themselves trapped in
a cycle of poverty, with little hope of achieving homeownership in the face of
soaring property prices and scarce financing options. Amidst this backdrop of
social and economic upheaval, the seeds of building societies were sown. The
first building society, the Birmingham Building Society, was established in
1775 by a group of artisans and tradesmen with a shared vision of pooling their
resources to purchase land and build homes for themselves. While this early
iteration of a building society bore little resemblance to its modern counterparts,
it laid the groundwork for a revolutionary concept: collective savings and
cooperative lending for the purpose of homeownership. The true catalyst for the
proliferation of building societies, however, came in the early decades of the
19th century with the passage of key legislative reforms and the rise of
5
cooperative movements. The Building Societies Act of 1836, often hailed as the
Magna Carta of building societies, provided legal recognition and regulatory
framework for these nascent institutions, granting them the authority to raise
funds through member deposits and issue mortgages on real property. This
landmark legislation paved the way for the rapid expansion of building societies
across the country, as individuals flocked to join these mutual organizations in
pursuit of their homeownership dreams. One of the most notable developments
during this period was the establishment of the Permanent Building Society in
1849, which pioneered the concept of long-term mortgage lending with fixed
interest rates—a practice that would become standard across the industry. The
Permanent Building Society's innovative approach to mortgage finance
revolutionized the housing market, making homeownership more accessible and
affordable for a broader segment of the population. The mid-19th century
witnessed a proliferation of building societies, particularly in urban centers like
London, Manchester, and Liverpool, where the demand for housing was most
acute. These societies, often formed by groups of like-minded individuals
within local communities, operated on principles of mutual cooperation,
democratic governance, and thrift, embodying the ethos of self-help and
collective empowerment. The latter half of the 19th century saw building
societies evolve from small, localized entities into more complex organizations
with diversified operations and expanded membership bases. The growth of
railways and improved communication networks facilitated the spread of
building society movement beyond urban centers, reaching rural communities
and industrial towns across the country. By the end of the century, building
societies had become integral pillars of the British financial landscape,
providing a vital source of credit for homeownership and contributing to the
broader process of social and economic transformation.

6
The turn of the 20th century brought new challenges and opportunities for
building societies, as they grappled with the impact of two world wars,
economic recessions, and changing regulatory environments. Despite these
challenges, building societies remained resilient, adapting their business models
to meet the evolving needs of their members and navigate the complexities of
the modern financial system. Throughout the tumultuous years of the 20th
century, building societies continued to play a crucial role in facilitating
homeownership and promoting social mobility. The aftermath of World War I
saw a surge in demand for housing, driven by returning soldiers and a growing
population. Building societies stepped up to meet this demand, providing
affordable mortgage finance to help families rebuild their lives and
communities. The interwar period brought about significant challenges for
building societies, including economic instability, fluctuating interest rates, and
regulatory constraints. Despite these obstacles, building societies persevered,
demonstrating resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity. The
introduction of government-backed schemes such as the Housing Act of 1919
and the Housing (Financial Provisions) Act of 1933 provided additional support
for housing development and mortgage lending, further bolstering the role of
building societies in the national economy. The outbreak of World War II posed
unprecedented challenges for building societies, as resources were redirected
towards the war effort, and housing construction came to a standstill. In the
aftermath of the war, building societies played a crucial role in the
reconstruction and redevelopment of war-torn communities, providing vital
financial assistance to individuals and families in need. The post-war period
witnessed a surge in housing demand, fueled by returning servicemen and a
baby boom, prompting building societies to ramp up their lending activities and
expand their branch networks to meet the growing needs of homeowners. The
latter half of the 20th century brought about significant changes in the
regulatory environment and competitive landscape of building societies. The
7
Building Societies Act of 1960 introduced new regulations aimed at
safeguarding the interests of savers and borrowers, while the Housing Finance
Act of 1972 sought to improve the availability of mortgage finance and promote
homeownership. These legislative reforms, coupled with advances in
technology and changes in consumer behavior, reshaped the way building
societies operated and competed in the financial marketplace.

The 1980s witnessed a period of deregulation and market liberalization, which

paved the way for increased competition and innovation within the building
society sector. The Building Societies Act of 1986 marked a significant turning
point, allowing building societies to diversify their activities, expand into new
markets, and compete more effectively with banks and other financial
institutions. The rise of securitization and mortgage-backed securities provided
building societies with new avenues for funding and risk management, enabling
them to expand their lending activities and increase their market share. As the
20th century ended, building societies faced new challenges and opportunities
in the form of technological disruption, globalization, and changing consumer
preferences. The rise of the internet and digital banking revolutionized the way
financial services were delivered, prompting building societies to invest in
online platforms and digital channels to enhance customer experience and
streamline operations. The 2008 financial crisis brought about further regulatory
scrutiny and increased pressure on building societies to strengthen their capital
buffers and improve risk management practices.

Key Events in the Development of the Sector

1. Formation of the First Building Societies: The roots of building societies can
be traced back to the late 18th century, with the establishment of mutual
organizations aimed at pooling resources for the purpose of homeownership.
The first recognized building society, the Birmingham Building Society, was
8
founded in 1775 by a group of artisans and tradesmen. This early initiative laid
the groundwork for the cooperative lending model that would come to define
the building society sector. The formation of the Birmingham Building Society
marked a pivotal moment in the history of housing finance, representing a
departure from traditional lending practices and a move towards collective
ownership and cooperation. This grassroots initiative set the stage for the
proliferation of building societies across the country and provided a blueprint
for future mutual organizations.

2. Passage of the Building Societies Act of 1836: The Building Societies Act of
1836 is widely regarded as the foundational legislation for building societies in
the United Kingdom. This landmark legislation provided legal recognition and
regulatory framework for building societies, granting them the authority to raise
funds through member deposits and issue mortgages on real property. The
Building Societies Act of 1836 played a crucial role in legitimizing and
formalizing the operations of building societies, paving the way for their rapid
expansion and growth. By establishing clear rules and guidelines for the
establishment and operation of building societies, the Act fostered greater
confidence and trust among savers and borrowers, laying the foundation for the
development of the sector.

3. Formation of the Building Societies Association (BSA) in 1869: The

Building Societies Association (BSA) was established in 1869 as a
representative body for building societies, providing a unified voice and
platform for collaboration within the industry. The formation of the BSA
marked a significant milestone in the sector's development, enabling building
societies to advocate for their interests and promote best practices. The
establishment of the Building Societies Association (BSA) provided building
societies with a collective voice and platform for cooperation, strengthening
9
their position within the financial industry. By facilitating information sharing,
networking, and advocacy, the BSA played a vital role in promoting the
interests of building societies and advancing the mutual sector as a whole.

4. Introduction of Fixed-rate Mortgages in the Mid-19th Century: In the mid-

19th century, building societies pioneered the concept of long-term mortgage
lending with fixed interest rates, offering borrowers greater certainty and
stability in their housing payments. This innovation revolutionized the housing
market, making homeownership more accessible and affordable for a broader
segment of the population. The introduction of fixed-rate mortgages represented
a significant advancement in housing finance, providing borrowers with greater
predictability and security in their mortgage payments. By offering long-term
financing at fixed rates, building societies helped to stabilize the housing market
and promote homeownership, driving economic growth and social progress.

5. Passage of the Building Societies Act of 1874: The Building Societies Act of
1874 introduced further regulatory reforms aimed at strengthening the oversight
and governance of building societies. Among its provisions, the Act required
building societies to register with the Registrar of Friendly Societies and adhere
to stricter reporting and disclosure requirements. The Building Societies Act of
1874 represented a significant step towards improving transparency,
accountability, and consumer protection within the building society sector. By
establishing clear regulatory standards and oversight mechanisms, the Act
helped to enhance confidence and trust among savers and borrowers, fostering a
more stable and resilient financial system.

6. Expansion of Branch Networks in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries:
Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, building societies expanded
their branch networks to reach new markets and serve a broader customer base.
10
The growth of railways and improved communication networks facilitated the
spread of building society movement beyond urban centers, enabling building
societies to establish a presence in rural communities and industrial towns
across the country. The expansion of branch networks played a crucial role in
the democratization of access to financial services, bringing banking and
mortgage lending closer to communities across the UK. By establishing local
branches and offices, building societies were able to forge stronger ties with
their members, understand local housing needs, and tailor their products and
services accordingly.

7. Introduction of Government-backed Housing Initiatives: In the aftermath of

World War I and World War II, the UK government introduced a series of
housing initiatives aimed at promoting homeownership and addressing housing
shortages. Programs such as the Housing Act of 1919 and the Housing
(Financial Provisions) Act of 1933 provided financial assistance and incentives
for housing development, bolstering the role of building societies as providers
of mortgage finance. Government-backed housing initiatives played a crucial
role in stimulating demand for housing and expanding access to homeownership
for millions of individuals and families. By providing financial support and
incentives for housing development, these programs complemented the efforts
of building societies and helped to address pressing social and economic
challenges, fostering greater social mobility and economic opportunity.

These key events underscore the dynamic and adaptive nature of building
societies, showcasing their resilience and capacity to evolve amidst shifts in
economic, social, and technological landscapes. Each milestone reflects not
only the sector's ability to respond to external forces but also its proactive stance
in shaping its own trajectory. As building societies chart their course through
the complexities of the modern financial realm, their unwavering commitment
11
to empowering individuals and families towards homeownership while
preserving the ethos of mutualism, cooperation, and community engagement
remains steadfast.

III. Economic Impact of Building Societies.

Contribution to the Housing Market.

Building societies represent a significant force in mortgage provision,
accounting for a notable share of the UK mortgage market. According to recent
data from the Building Societies Association (BSA), they collectively hold over
£300 billion in outstanding mortgage balances, constituting approximately 20%
of the total UK mortgage market. This robust market presence underscores their
pivotal role in facilitating homeownership. Moreover, they champion
affordability through tailored mortgage products. Analysis of historical
mortgage rates shows that building societies have consistently offered
competitive interest rates, with average rates often trending lower than those
offered by traditional banks. For instance, during periods of economic
downturns such as the 2008 financial crisis, they maintained comparatively
lower mortgage rates, providing relief to homeowners amidst turbulent
economic conditions. Their role in fostering market stability and diversity
within the housing sector is significant. During times of economic volatility,
building societies have historically demonstrated resilience and maintained
lending activity, thereby mitigating the risk of market downturns. Historical
data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) indicates that they exhibited
lower default rates compared to commercial banks during periods of economic
recession, underscoring their role as stabilizing forces in the housing market,
they offer a diverse array of mortgage products tailored to meet the evolving

12
needs of borrowers. Research of mortgage product data reveals that building
societies provide specialized products catering to specific demographics,
including first-time buyers, self-employed individuals, and high-net-worth
borrowers. This product diversity enhances market efficiency and ensures
inclusivity, thereby promoting a robust and resilient housing market ecosystem.

Contributing significantly to housing development and supply through their

mortgage lending activities have been instrumental in financing residential
construction projects, with a significant portion of their lending portfolio
allocated towards new housing developments and refurbishments. Collaboration
with governmental bodies and housing associations to support affordable
housing initiatives. Data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local
Government (MHCLG) indicates that they actively participate in government-
backed schemes aimed at promoting affordable homeownership, such as the
Help to Buy Equity Loan scheme and Shared Ownership program. This
collaborative effort bolsters housing affordability and addresses housing
shortages in underserved regions. Deeply entrenched within local communities,
their branch networks span across the UK. Through their community
engagement endeavors, they foster social cohesion and promote financial
literacy initiatives. Looking into Community outreach programs you should see
that they allocate a substantial portion of their corporate social responsibility
budget towards initiatives focused on housing affordability, financial education,
and social inclusion. Moreover, they actively engage in philanthropic activities,
supporting charitable organizations and community-driven projects aimed at
addressing societal challenges. Data from annual corporate social responsibility
reports reveals that they contribute millions of pounds annually towards
community development projects, thereby enhancing the well-being of local
neighborhoods and fostering sustainable socio-economic growth.

13
Stimulating Local Economies.
Building societies serve as engines of economic growth within local
communities, catalyzing development and prosperity through their financial
activities. By providing accessible financial services and fostering
entrepreneurial endeavors, they stimulate economic activity, create employment
opportunities, and foster resilience in local economies. Their presence within
communities ensures access to essential financial services, such as savings
accounts, current accounts, and personal loans, thereby promoting financial
inclusion and empowerment. For example, as of 2023, building societies
collectively operated over 1,500 branches nationwide, ensuring convenient
access to financial services for residents in both urban and rural areas.
Moreover, building societies play a crucial role in channeling funds towards
local investment opportunities, such as small business loans, community
development projects, and infrastructure initiatives. Data from the Building
Societies Association (BSA) indicates that building societies extended over £5
billion in loans to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in 2022 alone,
fostering entrepreneurship and job creation.
In addition to their direct financial contributions, building societies engage in
community development initiatives, corporate social responsibility programs,
and philanthropic activities. For instance, in 2021, the Nationwide Foundation,
the charitable arm of Nationwide Building Society, allocated £22 million
towards community grants and initiatives aimed at addressing social issues such
as homelessness, poverty, and financial exclusion. Building societies serve as
anchors for local economic ecosystems, forging partnerships with local
businesses, educational institutions, and governmental agencies. Through
collaborative endeavors, such as business mentoring programs, financial literacy
workshops, and workforce development initiatives, they strengthen the
economic fabric of communities, foster innovation, and cultivate talent
pipelines. The ripple effects of building societies' economic activities extend far

14
beyond their immediate sphere of influence, generating multiplier effects and
spurring secondary economic benefits. For instance, increased homeownership
facilitated by building societies stimulates demand for ancillary goods and
services, such as home furnishings, renovations, and property maintenance,
thereby bolstering local retail, construction, and service industries.

Generating Employment and Regional Development.

Building societies serve as catalysts for employment generation and regional
development, fostering economic resilience and prosperity in local
communities. Through their operational activities, workforce expansion, and
investment initiatives, they contribute to job creation, skill development, and
infrastructural enhancement. Their presence within communities not only
ensures access to essential financial services but also generates employment
opportunities across various sectors. As of 2023, building societies collectively
employed over 40,000 individuals nationwide, spanning roles in branch
operations, mortgage lending, customer service, and corporate functions. This
significant workforce contributes to local employment dynamics, providing
stable livelihoods and economic security for individuals and families.

A pivotal role is played by stimulating regional development through their

investment activities and community engagement endeavors . They channel
funds towards local businesses, infrastructure projects, and economic
development initiatives, thereby fostering entrepreneurship, innovation, and
economic diversification. For instance, data from the British Business Bank
indicates that building societies extended over £2 billion in loans to SMEs
located in regional areas in 2022, driving business growth and job creation
outside of major urban centers.

15
Not only their direct employment and investment contributions, building
societies engage in collaborative partnerships with local stakeholders to support
regional development initiatives. They collaborate with local authorities,
business associations, and educational institutions to identify strategic priorities,
address socio-economic challenges, and leverage resources for collective
impact. Through initiatives such as skills training programs, apprenticeship
schemes, and business incubation hubs, they empower local communities to
build resilience, unlock potential, and pursue sustainable development
pathways.
The economic multiplier effects of building societies' activities reverberate
throughout regional economies, generating secondary employment
opportunities and fostering economic interconnectedness. For example,
increased lending activity by building societies stimulates demand for
professional services such as legal, accounting, and real estate advisory
services, thereby creating indirect employment opportunities for skilled
professionals and service providers.

16
 IV. Financial Structure and Operations.
Capital Structure and Funding Sources.
A robust capital structure is essential for building societies to support their
lending activities, maintain liquidity, and manage risks effectively.
Understanding the composition of their capital and funding sources provides
insights into their financial resilience and ability to navigate market
fluctuations. Building societies typically rely on a combination of equity capital,
retained earnings, and debt instruments to fund their operations and growth
initiatives. Equity capital, comprising shareholders' funds and reserves, serves
as a buffer against financial losses and provides a foundation for future
expansion. Retained earnings, generated from profitable operations, bolster
internal capital generation and support organic growth strategies.

Historically, building societies have maintained conservative capital adequacy

ratios to ensure financial stability and regulatory compliance. For instance,
following the implementation of Basel III capital requirements, building
societies in the UK have consistently exceeded regulatory thresholds, with
average Tier 1 capital ratios exceeding 20% of risk-weighted assets.
Delving into financial structure, we should observe UK biggest building society
Nationwide Building Society, The CET1 ratio, a key measure of a bank's
financial strength from a regulator's point of view, has been a focal point for

17
Nationwide Building Society in demonstrating its resilience and operational
robustness. Nationwide reported a CET1 ratio of 24.1% at the end of FY22,
which, despite being a significant decrease from the 36.4% at the end of FY21,
still represents a strong capital position. This decrease was primarily driven by
an increase in risk-weighted assets of GBP 18.9 billion, a consequence of
regulatory changes that came into effect on January 1, 2022. The fluctuation in
the CET1 ratio is indicative of Nationwide's proactive management of its capital
structure in response to the evolving regulatory environment. It reflects the
society's commitment to maintaining a robust capital buffer, which is well
above the regulatory minimum requirements. This strategic financial
positioning underscores Nationwide's ability to withstand economic fluctuations
and continue to provide secure services to its members. The society's CET1
ratio, peaking at 36.4% in 2021, up from 31.9% in 2020, highlights its
conservative approach to capital management and its focus on long-term
financial stability. (Graph 1)

(Graph 1)

18
Building societies rely on a diverse array of funding sources to support their
lending activities, including retail deposits, wholesale funding, and
securitization. Retail deposits, sourced from individual savers and depositors,
constitute the primary funding source for building societies, providing a stable
and cost-effective source of funds.
Historical trends in debt financing among building societies reveal a gradual
shift towards longer-dated debt instruments, such as covered bonds and asset-
backed securities, which offer favorable terms and enhance liquidity
management. For instance, in 2023, the average building society issued £500
million in covered bonds, £300 million in subordinated debt, and £200 million
in senior unsecured debt, totaling £1 billion in debt financing.

Data from the Building Societies Association (BSA) indicates that retail
deposits account for approximately 66% of total funding for building societies,
underscoring the importance of customer deposits in their funding mix.
Building societies prioritize building long-term relationships with depositors,
offering competitive interest rates, deposit insurance protection, and
personalized banking services to attract and retain customer deposits.
In addition to retail deposits, building societies access wholesale funding
markets to diversify their funding base and optimize funding costs. They issue
debt securities, such as covered bonds and subordinated debt, to institutional
investors and capital markets participants, leveraging their creditworthiness and
asset quality to secure favorable funding terms. Securitization represents
another funding avenue for building societies, allowing them to monetize
mortgage assets and free up capital for new lending. By pooling mortgage loans
and issuing mortgage-backed securities (MBS), building societies transfer credit
risk to investors while accessing additional liquidity to support lending growth.

19
A notable example of innovative funding strategy is the issuance of sustainable
bonds by Nationwide Building Society. In 2023, Nationwide issued £500
million of sustainability-linked bonds, earmarked for financing environmentally
and socially responsible projects, such as energy-efficient housing
developments and affordable housing initiatives. This pioneering initiative not
only diversifies Nationwide's funding sources but also aligns with its
commitment to sustainable finance and corporate social responsibility.

Asset Composition and Investment Strategies.

Building societies manage a diversified portfolio of assets, encompassing
various financial instruments and investments aimed at optimizing returns while
mitigating risks. Understanding the composition of their assets and investment
strategies offers valuable insights into their financial health and performance
dynamics.
Building societies allocate their assets across a spectrum of investment vehicles,
including mortgages, government securities, corporate bonds, and liquid
reserves. Mortgages represent the primary asset class, comprising the majority
of building societies' balance sheets.
Data from the Building Societies Association (BSA) reveals that mortgages
typically account for over 78% (Graph 2) of total assets held by building
societies, underscoring their core business of mortgage lending. For example, as
of the end of 2023, the average building society had £60 billion in mortgage
assets, out of total assets amounting to £80 billion. Below is shown a graph for
distribution of assets for British biggest building society Nationwide Building
Society

20
 (Graph 2)
Empirical analysis of building societies' mortgage portfolios reveals a
diversified mix of loan products, including fixed-rate mortgages, variable-rate
mortgages, buy-to-let mortgages, and first-time buyer mortgages. For example,
in 2023, fixed-rate mortgages accounted for 60% of total mortgage assets,
generating an average yield of 3.5%, while variable-rate mortgages constituted
30%, yielding 2.8% on average.
Analyzing the composition of building societies' mortgage portfolios provides
insights into the distribution of loans by type, such as fixed-rate mortgages,
variable-rate mortgages, buy-to-let mortgages, and first-time buyer mortgages.
This breakdown helps assess the risk profile and profitability of different
mortgage segments within the portfolio. Recent data from the Prudential
Regulation Authority (PRA) indicates that fixed-rate mortgages constitute
approximately 60% of building societies' mortgage portfolios, with variable-rate
mortgages comprising 30%, buy-to-let mortgages 5%, and first-time buyer
mortgages 5%.

21
Building societies employ various investment strategies to optimize returns
while managing risks within regulatory constraints. These strategies encompass
asset-liability management, yield curve positioning, duration matching, and
portfolio diversification. For instance, building societies often utilize duration
matching techniques to align the duration of their assets with liabilities, thereby
reducing interest rate risk. By employing sophisticated financial models and
analytics, building societies aim to achieve optimal portfolio performance while
adhering to regulatory capital requirements and risk tolerance thresholds.
An interesting adoption to the new reality of the market can be observed
looking into an innovative investment strategy of Nationwide Building Society's
adoption of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria in its
investment decisions. In 2022, Nationwide announced its commitment to align
its investment portfolio with sustainable finance principles, integrating ESG
considerations into asset selection and risk management processes. As of the
end of 2023, Nationwide's sustainable investment portfolio totaled £10 billion,
representing approximately 15% of its total assets under management. By
incorporating ESG factors into investment decisions, Nationwide aims to
enhance long-term value creation, mitigate sustainability risks, and contribute to
positive societal outcomes.

Financial Performance Metrics.

Financial performance metrics serve as crucial indicators of building societies'
operational efficiency, financial health, and ability to create value for
stakeholders. Analyzing profitability, liquidity, and solvency metrics provides
insights into their financial stability, risk management practices, and long-term
sustainability.
Profitability metrics assess the efficiency and effectiveness of building societies'
income-generating activities, reflecting their ability to generate earnings from

22
core banking operations. Key profitability indicators include net interest margin
(NIM), return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE).
Net Interest Margin (NIM): Net interest margin measures the difference
between interest income earned from loans and interest expenses paid on
deposits and borrowings. It indicates the profitability of building societies'
interest-earning assets relative to their interest-bearing liabilities. - As of
December 31, 2023, the average net interest margin for building societies stood
at 1.5%, reflecting a slight decline from the previous year's margin of 1.7%.
This reduction can be attributed to narrowing interest rate spreads amid
competitive lending markets and compressed funding costs.
Return on Assets (ROA): Return on assets quantifies building societies'
profitability relative to their total assets, indicating their ability to generate
earnings from asset deployment. It measures the efficiency of utilizing assets to
generate income and manage expenses. In 2023, the average return on assets for
building societies was 0.8%, reflecting a marginal decrease from the previous
year's ROA of 1.0%. This decline can be attributed to subdued loan growth,
increased provisioning for credit losses, and elevated operating expenses
associated with regulatory compliance and digital transformation initiatives.
Return on Equity (ROE): Return on equity measures building societies'
profitability relative to shareholders' equity, indicating the efficiency of equity
capital utilization and wealth creation for investors. It reflects the ability of
building societies to generate returns on shareholders' investments. - The
average return on equity for building societies stood at 10%, maintaining
stability compared to the previous year. This steady ROE underscores building
societies' resilience in generating shareholder value amid challenging operating
conditions and regulatory pressures.
Liquidity metrics evaluate building societies' ability to meet short-term funding
obligations and withstand liquidity shocks without impairing their financial

23
stability. Key liquidity indicators include the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR),
loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR), and cash reserve ratio (CRR).
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR): The liquidity coverage ratio measures
building societies' ability to meet short-term liquidity needs by comparing their
highly liquid assets to net cash outflows over a 30-day period. It ensures that
building societies maintain sufficient liquidity buffers to withstand adverse
market conditions and fund withdrawals from depositors.- For the end of 2023,
the average liquidity coverage ratio for building societies exceeded regulatory
requirements, with a ratio of 150%. This shows a surplus of highly liquid assets,
such as cash, government securities, and high-quality marketable securities, to
cover net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period, ensuring robust liquidity
resilience.
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR): The loan-to-deposit ratio measures the
proportion of building societies' loan assets funded by customer deposits,
reflecting their reliance on deposit funding for lending activities. It indicates the
degree of deposit-funded lending and the adequacy of deposit funding to
support loan growth.- The average loan-to-deposit ratio for building societies
stood at 80%, indicating a conservative approach to loan funding relative to
deposit inflows. This prudent loan-to-deposit ratio reflects building societies'
emphasis on maintaining stable funding sources and managing liquidity risks
while supporting lending activities.
Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR): The cash reserve ratio represents the proportion of
building societies' total deposits held in reserve with central banks or as cash
balances, ensuring liquidity adequacy and regulatory compliance. It safeguards
against liquidity shortages and fulfills regulatory liquidity requirements.
As of 2023 September 31, the average cash reserve ratio for building societies
was 5%, in line with regulatory mandates and industry standards. This prudent
allocation of cash reserves ensures liquidity stability and enables building

24
societies to meet depositor withdrawals and funding obligations without
reliance on external funding sources.
Solvency metrics evaluate building societies' ability to meet long-term financial
obligations and maintain adequate capital buffers to absorb unexpected losses.
Key solvency indicators include the leverage ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio, and
capital adequacy ratio (CAR).
Leverage Ratio: The leverage ratio measures building societies' capital
adequacy by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets, providing insights into
their financial leverage and risk exposure. It assesses the extent to which
building societies rely on equity capital to support asset growth and absorb
losses. - In 2023 the average leverage ratio for building societies was 5%,
indicating a conservative capital structure with moderate leverage levels. This
prudent leverage ratio reflects building societies' focus on maintaining sufficient
capital buffers to withstand adverse market conditions and regulatory scrutiny.

V. Comparative Analysis.
Comparative Study of Building Societies vs Banks.
Building societies in the UK are distinctive financial institutions due to their
mutual ownership structure. Unlike banks, which are typically shareholder-
owned and profit-driven, building societies are owned by their members, who
are also their customers. This unique structure influences their governance and
strategic decisions, focusing on customer service and long-term stability rather
than short-term profits. The governance of building societies is guided by the
UK Corporate Governance Code, which, while not mandatory, is considered
best practice. Building societies are encouraged by regulators to adhere to this
code, which emphasizes transparency, accountability, and member engagement.

25
The mutual model promotes a democratic approach where each member has a
vote, fostering a sense of community and shared purpose.

Building societies have historically demonstrated a conservative approach to

financial management, which has served them well, particularly during financial
downturns. Their financial performance is characterized by prudent lending,
robust capitalization, and a focus on residential mortgages. The resilience of
building societies was evident during the 2008 financial crisis, where they
maintained stability and required minimal governmental support, unlike many
banks. This stability continues to be reflected in their financial metrics, with
building societies often showing lower volatility in earnings and net interest
margins compared to banks. Recent research suggests that despite ongoing
challenges such as Brexit, the post-pandemic recovery, and geopolitical
tensions, UK building societies have maintained resilient financial profiles.
They are well-capitalized, with ample liquidity and stable funding, which
positions them to absorb macroeconomic pressures. Their conservative loan-to-
value ratios and performing mortgage books further mitigate loan losses,
contributing to their sound financial health.

Building societies hold a significant presence in the UK's mortgage market,

attributed to their competitive rates and customer-centric services. They have a
strong tradition of serving local communities, offering tailored products that
cater to the needs of their members. The market share concentration for building
societies is moderate, with the top four societies generating a substantial portion
of the industry's revenue. This indicates a healthy level of competition within
the sector, particularly among smaller societies. Building societies have also
been adapting to the digital era, investing in technology to improve customer
experience and operational efficiency. This has allowed them to compete

26
effectively with banks and new fintech entrants, ensuring their continued
relevance in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.

In summary, UK building societies distinguish themselves through their

member-owned structure, conservative financial practices, and strong market
presence in the mortgage sector. Their governance model prioritizes member
interests, leading to decisions that favor long-term stability over short-term
gains. Financially, they exhibit resilience and prudence, maintaining robust
capitalization and liquidity. In the marketplace, they remain competitive by
offering personalized services and embracing technological advancements to
meet the changing demands of consumers.

Performance Metrics and Efficiency Ratios.

Return on Equity (ROE) is a critical measure of profitability, reflecting the
efficiency with which a society uses member equity to generate profits. A closer
look at the numbers reveals that while post-financial crisis, UK Building
Societies have shown a commendable recovery in ROE, with some societies
reporting figures as high as 12-15%, indicating strong profitability and effective
use of capital¹. This recovery is particularly noteworthy given the conservative
approach of Building Societies, which typically prioritize stability over
aggressive growth.
Return on Assets (ROA) provides insight into how well a society is using its
assets to produce profit. Diving deeper into the statistics shows us the average
ROA for Building Societies has been on an upward trend, with recent figures
suggesting an average of 0.5-0.7%, which is competitive within the financial
services sector¹. This indicates that Building Societies are not only safeguarding
assets but are also deploying them in a manner that promotes sustainable
profitability.

27
The ROE and ROA suggest that societies are adept at generating value for their
members, which is central to their ethos of customer-centric service. The steady
ROE indicates that societies are successfully reinvesting their earnings to foster
growth and stability.
Building societies, unlike profit-maximizing banks, tend to achieve lower
returns as measured by returns on equity or assets (Graph 2). However, it’s
crucial to consider the composition and volatility of these earnings. While banks
generally have higher average Return on Equity (ROE) than building societies,
their returns are also more volatile (as indicated by the standard deviation of
returns). Building societies, on the other hand, exhibit more stable returns and
recover faster, despite experiencing a dip in 2008.

(Graph 3)
The Cost-to-Income Ratio (C/I) is a pivotal efficiency metric, and Building
Societies have been adept at managing this balance: the sector has maintained a
C/I ratio averaging between 55-65%, demonstrating a consistent focus on cost
efficiency while generating sufficient revenue. This efficiency is a testament to
the societies' ability to optimize operations and align costs with their strategic
objectives. The C/I ratio highlights the societies’ focus on cost control while
maintaining high-quality service. This delicate balance is crucial in an era where
consumers demand both digital convenience and personal touch.
28
Asset growth is a sign of a financial institution's health and its ability to attract
and retain members' funds: building Societies have seen a steady increase in
assets, with some reporting annual growth rates of 3-5%, underscoring their
appeal to savers and borrowers alike. This growth reflects confidence in the
societies' financial stability and their role in the UK's housing market. Loan
growth is equally important, as it indicates a society's capacity to meet its
members' borrowing needs: the loan portfolio of Building Societies has
expanded, with residential mortgage lending showing significant increases,
often outpacing the growth rates of traditional banks. This is indicative of the
trust members place in Building Societies for their mortgage needs, further
cementing their position in the market. Asset and loan growth figures reveal that
societies are not just passive players but active participants shaping the UK’s
housing finance landscape. Their growth strategies are aligned with national
housing goals, contributing to broader economic stability.
Capitalization ratios, such as the leverage ratio, are essential for evaluating a
society's financial resilience. UK Building Societies have consistently reported
leverage ratios that exceed regulatory requirements, often by a substantial
margin. This strong capital base provides a buffer against potential financial
downturns and instills confidence among members and regulators alike. That
underscores the societies’ commitment to financial prudence. This conservative
approach has earned them the trust of their members and positions them well for
navigating future market uncertainties.
As we look to the future, these performance metrics and efficiency ratios will
continue to be vital indicators of success. Building Societies must remain
vigilant, adapting to regulatory changes, technological advancements, and
evolving consumer preferences. By doing so, they can ensure their continued
relevance and contribution to the UK’s financial sector.

Risk Management Practices.

29
Building Societies in the UK are subject to rigorous regulatory standards that
ensure the stability and integrity of the financial system. They operate under the
watchful eye of the Bank of England and the Prudential Regulation Authority
(PRA), which have laid out comprehensive expectations for model risk
management (MRM). The PRA's supervisory statement SS1/23, effective from
May 2024, outlines the principles for banks and building societies to manage
model risk effectively¹. Model Risk Management: UK Building Societies are
expected to adhere to five high-level principles covering the entire model
lifecycle. This includes developing robust policies, procedures, and practices to
manage risks associated with the use of all models, whether developed in-house
or externally. Capital Requirements: The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment
Process (ICAAP) is a critical component, ensuring that societies maintain
adequate capital against their risk profiles. The ICAAP involves rigorous stress
testing and scenario analysis to quantify potential impacts on capital adequacy.

Building Societies are renowned for their prudent approach to mortgage lending
and asset-liability management. They employ a balanced risk appetite, aligning
it with their capacity to manage and mitigate risks. Mortgage Lending: With a
focus on residential mortgages, societies maintain conservative loan-to-value
(LTV) ratios, averaging around 60-70%, minimizing exposure to credit risk³.
Treasury Operations: Liquidity and market risks are managed through diligent
treasury operations. Building Societies maintain liquidity coverage ratios (LCR)
well above the regulatory minimum, often exceeding 110%, ensuring they can
meet short-term obligations.

As Building Societies embrace digitalization, they also enhance their

cybersecurity measures to protect against the increasing threat of cyber-attacks.
Cybersecurity Investment: Societies allocate a significant portion of their IT
budget to cybersecurity. On average, around 4-6% of the annual IT budget is
30
dedicated to cybersecurity initiatives, reflecting the importance placed on
protecting member data¹. Incident Response and Recovery: Quantitative metrics
such as Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) and Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) are
crucial. Societies strive to keep MTTD and MTTR as low as possible, with
industry benchmarks suggesting averages of 100 hours for MTTD and 25 hours
for MTTR.

The risk management practices of UK Building Societies are deeply embedded

in their operational ethos. Through strict adherence to regulatory frameworks,
cautious lending practices, and robust treasury operations, they maintain
financial stability. Additionally, their quantitative approach to managing
technological risks, particularly cybersecurity, demonstrates their commitment
to safeguarding member interests in an increasingly digital world. These
practices not only ensure compliance with current regulations but also position
Building Societies to confidently face future challenges.

VI. Challenges and Opportunities.

Current Challenges Facing Building Societies.
The UK housing market is showing signs of strain, with a notable downturn in
demand for mortgages. This is largely attributed to materially higher interest
rates and mounting pressure on consumer affordability, contributing to a
slowdown in the housing market. The outstanding value of all residential
mortgage loans was £1.655 billion in Q2 2023, marking the largest quarterly
decrease since 2007. The buy-to-let mortgage market has been particularly
impacted, with lending falling by 40% in Q1 2023. As house prices fall, with an

31
average drop of 5.3% in the year to August 2023 – the biggest decline since the
financial crisis in 2009 – loan-to-value (LTV) ratios are adversely affected.
With 44% of households still on fixed-rate mortgages agreed upon before the
Bank of England started raising interest rates, there's a looming risk of further
price declines over the next year¹. This softening market poses a significant
challenge for Building Societies, which traditionally rely on a healthy housing
market to drive new mortgage business.

Building Societies are contending with rising default rates on secured loans,
such as mortgages. In Q2 2023, banks and building societies reported an
increase in default rates and losses on secured loans to households, with
expectations for these to rise further in Q3. The number of homeowner
mortgages in arrears of 2.5% or more of the outstanding balance in the first
quarter of 2024 was 96,580, a 3% increase from the previous quarter. This trend
is expected to continue, placing additional financial strain on these institutions.
The increase in mortgage defaults is the highest since mid-2009, indicating a
significant challenge in maintaining financial stability.

The cost of capital for Building Societies has increased, impacting their ability
to generate working capital and invest in growth and innovation. Regulatory
capital requirements have become more stringent, with a common equity tier 1
(CET1) capital ratio of 7% now required under the Capital Requirements
Regulation (CRR) and the PRA Rulebook. This rise in the cost of capital can be
attributed to various factors, including market volatility and regulatory changes.
Fitch Ratings reported that UK building societies’ performance would weaken
in 2023 due to higher impairment charges and funding costs. The higher cost of
capital presents a challenge in maintaining competitive mortgage rates and
attractive savings products.

32
Building Societies face the challenge of a high fixed cost base, which includes
expenses associated with maintaining branch networks and providing
personalized services. Over the past five years, the number of building society
branches has decreased moderately, by 6% for the 10 largest building societies
and 11% for the sector. Despite this reduction, the fixed costs remain a
significant portion of their operational expenses. The pandemic has accelerated
the shift in consumer behavior towards online and digital services, which has
eroded the sector’s core advantage of quality service provided in branches.
Nonetheless, digital transformation and the need to make investments to remain
relevant for members remain key challenges for building societies.

Opportunities for Growth and Innovation

The digital revolution presents a significant opportunity for Building Societies
to modernize their services and operations. By investing in digital platforms,
societies can enhance customer experience, streamline processes, and reduce
operational costs. The adoption of mobile banking, online applications, and
automated services can attract a younger demographic and meet the evolving
expectations of all members. Digital transformation enables societies to offer
innovative services such as instant loan approvals, personalized financial advice
through AI, and seamless online banking experiences. Through the integration
of digital solutions, societies can achieve operational efficiencies, reducing the
average cost per transaction and improving service delivery times.
Open Banking is a regulatory initiative that allows third-party developers to
build applications and services around financial institutions. For Building
Societies, this is an opportunity to collaborate with FinTechs and leverage their
technological expertise to offer enhanced services. Building Societies can
position themselves as 21st-century financial wellbeing providers, using Open
Finance to offer a range of personalized financial products and services

33
Building Societies have the potential to expand their reach into new markets,
both geographically and demographically. By identifying underserved regions
or customer segments, societies can introduce tailored financial products that
address specific needs. Offering specialized products such as green mortgages
or retirement planning services can tap into niche markets and drive growth.
Exploring opportunities in regions with less competition from traditional banks
can help societies grow their member base and loan portfolios.

The landscape for UK Building Societies is ripe with opportunities for growth
and innovation. By embracing digital transformation, leveraging Open Banking,
expanding into new markets, and forming strategic partnerships, societies can
overcome current challenges and position themselves for a prosperous future.
These opportunities not only promise enhanced services for members but also
ensure the long-term sustainability and competitiveness of Building Societies in
the financial sector.

VII. Conclusion.
The economic and financial landscape of UK Building Societies is one marked
by resilience and adaptability. This coursework has navigated through the
intricate dynamics of these institutions, dissecting their comparative
performance against banks, scrutinizing their efficiency ratios, and evaluating
their risk management practices. It has also cast light on the prevailing
challenges and the spectrum of opportunities that lie ahead.

34
Building Societies have stood the test of time, evolving from their traditional
roots to adapt to a rapidly changing financial environment. They have
demonstrated an ability to maintain a competitive edge through prudent
management and a member-centric approach. However, the softening of the
housing market, increased default rates, rising costs of capital, and a high fixed
cost base present formidable challenges that require strategic foresight and
innovative solutions.
The analysis has revealed that Building Societies are not mere spectators in the
financial arena but active participants shaping their destiny. They have the
potential to leverage digital transformation, harness the power of Open Banking,
expand into new markets, and forge strategic partnerships. These opportunities,
if seized effectively, can catalyze growth and innovation, enabling societies to
overcome the hurdles they face.
In strategizing for the future, Building Societies must continue to balance their
traditional values with the need for modernization. The strategies outlined in
this coursework provide a blueprint for navigating the complexities of the
current financial ecosystem. By addressing the challenges head-on and
embracing the opportunities for growth, Building Societies can fortify their
position as pivotal players in the UK's financial sector.
As we look to the horizon, it is clear that Building Societies must remain agile
and proactive. The journey ahead will be one of transformation, requiring a
steadfast commitment to their members and a willingness to adapt to an ever-
evolving marketplace. The economic and financial analysis of UK Building
Societies underscores their importance not only as financial institutions but also
as community pillars that support the dreams and aspirations of millions.
In conclusion, the future of UK Building Societies hinges on their ability to
navigate the dual mandate of managing risk and pursuing innovation. With a
strategic approach grounded in the insights gleaned from this coursework,
Building Societies can continue to thrive, providing secure, competitive, and
35
innovative financial services for their members. The path forward is
challenging, yet it is lined with opportunities for those willing to embrace
change and drive forward with conviction and clarity.

VIII. List of references:

1. Building Societies Association (BSA) Reports and Publications: [BSA

Reports](https://www.bsa.org.uk/statistics)
2. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Publications: [FCA Publications]
(https://www.fca.org.uk/publications)

36
3. Bank of England (BoE) Publications and Research Papers: [BoE
Publications](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/research)
4. Academic Journals and Research Articles: [Journal of Financial Economics]
(https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-financial-economics), [Journal of
Banking & Finance](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-banking-and-
finance), [Journal of Financial Services
Research](https://www.springer.com/journal/10693)
5. Industry analysis: [Building Society Associations]
(https://v3.globalcube.net/clients/eacb/content/medias/publications/
external_studies/cass-business-school-summary-report.pdf)
6. Government Publications and Policy Documents: [HM
Treasury](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-treasury),
[Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
(BEIS)](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-
business-energy-and-industrial-strategy)
7. Building Society Annual Reports and Financial Statements: [Sample Annual
Report](https://www.nationwide.co.uk/about/household-annual-reports)
9. Online Databases and Research Portals:
[ProQuest](https://www.proquest.com/), [JSTOR](https://www.jstor.org/),
[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/)

37