Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welfare Economics
Welfare Economics
Welfare Economics
NB THAKUR,LAW COLLEGE
NASHIK
SUBJECT NAME: B.A. 0403
Law and Economics
(BA LLB-IIND, SEM.-IV)
1. Vayoshreshtha Sammans – Provide national awards for senior citizens, for rendering
services to the elderly persons.
2. Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme – Provide social assistance for old age
persons.
Legislation is an instrument to control, guide and restrain the behaviour of individuals and
groups living in society.
● Social legislation is that branch of law which is an aggregate of the laws relating to the
various socio- economic condition of the people.
Objectives of MGNREGA:
● It gives a significant amount of control to the Gram Panchayats for managing public works, and
strengthening Panchayati Raj Institutions. Gram Sabhas are free to accept or reject recommendations
from Intermediate and District Panchayats.
● It incorporates accountability in its operational guidelines and ensures compliance and transparency at all
levels.
Role of State Governments in MGNREGS
The important roles of the state government in executing the MGNREGA scheme are:
1. It frames rules charting out the state’s responsibility under the act.
2. It sets up the State Employment Guarantee Council.
3. State Employment Guarantee Fund (SEGF) is established by state governments.
4. It makes sure to dedicate the Employment Guarantee Assistant (Gram Rozgar Sahayak), the PO and the staff at
the State, district, cluster and Gram Panchayat level; for the execution of the scheme.
The State Employment Guarantee Council is responsible for advising the state government for the implementation of
the MGNREG scheme. Some important functions of SEGC under MGNREGS are:
Introduction- The National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme run by
the Ministry of Rural Development. It provides social pensions to the elderly, widows, and people with
disabilities. The NSAP also offers bank accounts, postal accounts, money orders, cash, and verified Aadhaar.
The NSAP aims at ensuring minimum national standard for social assistance in
addition to the benefits that the States are currently providing or might provide in
future. The NSAP came into effect on 15 August 1995 as a wholly Centrally
Sponsored Scheme.
Three components:
(i) the National Old Age Pension Scheme (NOAPS)
(ii) the National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS), and
(iii) the National Maternity Benefit Scheme (NMBS)
At present, NSAP includes five sub-schemes, of which, three are pension
schemes as detailed under:
(i) Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS)
(ii) Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS), and
(iii) Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS).
The other two sub-schemes are not pension schemes are:
(iv) National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS)–a one-time assistance to the
bereaved family in the event of death of the breadwinner
(v) Annapurna Scheme–food security to the eligible old age persons who
have remained uncovered under IGNOAPS.
NSAP sub-schemes, eligibility criteria and Central Assistance
Key features of NSAP
Right to Education Act, 2009
The Right to Education Act (RTE) of 2009 is an act of the Parliament of India that makes
education a fundamental right for children between the ages of 6 and 14. The act was
enacted on August 4, 2009 and gives effect to the 86th Amendment Act of 2002.
(i) Marginal condition for efficiency in the allocation of factors among firms (efficiency
in production);
(iii) Marginal condition for efficiency in the allocation of factors among commodities
(efficiency in product-mix or composition of output).
Edgeworth Contract Curve for production
The dimensions of the rectangle in
Figure represent the total available
quantities
X02- Inputs X1, X2
Production of consumer goods- Q1 and
Q2.
For example, if the allocation of the inputs is given
by the point B, the quantities of X1 and X2 used in
the production of good Q1 are measured by the
coordinates of B with reference to the origin O, and
the quantities of X1 and X2 used in the production
of good Q2 are measured by the coordinates of
point B with reference to the origin O’.
The marginal condition for Pareto efficiency in production would be obtained if we maximise
the output of good Q1 subject to a given output level of good Q2. Such maximisation would occur
at a point of tangency between the IQs for the two goods.
For example, maximisation of output of Q1 subject to the quantity of Q2 as given by IQ3, would
occur at the point of tangency S between the IQs for the goods. Similarly, maximisation of
output of Q2 subject to the quantity of Qi as given by IQ3, would occur at the point of tangency R
between the IQs for the two goods.
At the end equilibrium will occur at point ‘e’ where both the consumers
have benefit from exchange.
Limitations of Pareto Efficiency
● Distribution Analysis: Pareto efficiency curves can be used to analyze equity, but
they themselves do not automatically consider implications of fairness.
● Perfect Competition: Pareto efficiency assumes that markets are perfectly
competitive, meaning that all buyers and sellers have equal market power and
perfect information. In reality, however, markets are often imperfectly competitive.
Some beings simply have more power than others.
● Externalities: Pareto efficiency only considers the benefits and costs that accrue to
the parties directly involved in a transaction, without taking into account any external
effects on third parties.
● Transaction Costs: Pareto efficiency assumes that all transactions can be
completed at zero cost, which is not always the case.
● Difficult Comparisons: Pareto efficiency requires comparison of different
individuals which can be difficult to do in practice.
What Is Economic Efficiency
Economic efficiency is when all goods and factors of production in an economy are
distributed or allocated to their most valuable uses and waste is eliminated or minimized.
● Economic efficiency refers to how effectively a society's scarce resources are used to
produce goods.
● Economists have several ways of measuring economic efficiency, based on the
allocation of inputs, costs, or the allocation of final consumer goods.
Economic Efficiency and Welfare
Welfare relates to the standard of living and relative comfort experienced by people within
the economy. At peak economic efficiency (when the economy is at productive and
allocative efficiency), the welfare of one cannot be improved without subsequently
lowering the welfare of another. This point is called Pareto efficiency.
Even if Pareto efficiency is reached, the standard of living of all individuals within the
economy may not be equal. Pareto efficiency does not include issues of fairness or
equality among those within a particular economy.
Pareto Criterion of Social Welfare
● Pareto efficiency does not provide a unique solution to how the economy should be
arranged. Multiple Pareto efficient arrangements of the distributions of wealth, income,
and production are possible.
● Moving the economy toward Pareto efficiency might be an overall improvement in social
welfare, but it does not provide a specific target as to which arrangement of economic
resources across individuals and markets will actually maximize social welfare.
● Under Pareto efficiency, optimal welfare, or utility, is achieved when the market is allowed to
reach an equilibrium price for a given good or service—it’s at this point that consumer and
producer surpluses are maximized.
● An example of applied welfare economics is the use of cost-benefit analyses to determine the
social impact of specific projects. In the case of a city planning commission that’s trying to
evaluate the creation of a new sports arena, the commissioners would likely balance the
benefits to fans and team owners with that of businesses or homeowners displaced by new
infrastructure.
Coase Theorem
Coase theorem states that one can assume an efficient and optimum output following the
negotiations between two parties if the external transaction cost between two parties over
any property dispute is absent. It shows that every property dispute can have an effective
negotiation and the best outcome irrespective of its nature.
● It assumes there won’t be any transaction cost, and contenders will have the equal
marketing power and perfect information.
Explanation of coase Theorem
● The Coase theorem is an economic and legal theory that addresses dispute resolution between
two parties without any transaction cost. It ensures an optimum outcome for both parties,
irrespective of its nature.
● Economist and author Ronald Coase, a British American, promulgated the theorem concerning
property rights in 1960 in the field of institutional economics.
● The theorem tried to explain the impact of government on economic growth.
For example, suppose any negative externality or external cost like air
or water pollution by the polluter is present in a situation. In that case,
one could only avoid it by allocating property rights so that one can
negotiate amicably.
The theorem assumes that transaction cost in the negotiation will be absent in competitive
markets, both parties have complete information, and both have equal marketing power. In the
absence of any of these, the theorem is not applicable.
Diagram and Explanation
● Pollutant gets a marginal benefit
represented by line ABC.
● The victim gets a marginal disbenefit, as
shown by line OBD.
● To reduce the pollution, victims will have to
pay an amount equal to what the triangle
ECB shows.
● For the Pollutant to continue polluting, it
must pay an amount equal to triangle OBE.
● The residents may find it difficult to live with such environmental pollution and
face health hazards. They may fall ill with lung ailments and have to bear a huge
health cost. In addition, it may prompt the residents to file a legal suit against
the factory. If this happens, the property rights issue between the factory owner
and the residents will crop up.
● The property dispute may lead to legal or Coase theorem transaction costs for
both parties if the court decides that the company can continue operations at
the expense of the residents or that the residents have the right to a clean
environment.
Limitations of the Coase Theorem:
1. The unreal proposition of equal bargaining between two parties over property disputes
makes the bargaining ineffective. As a result, the assumption of effective and efficient
negotiation as required by the theorem fails.
2. Another assumption of Coase theory assumes that transaction cost has to be zero, which
is never always possible in the real world. So, it gets limited in the scope of application.
3. Coase theorem states that one equally distributes the income during negotiation over the
disputed property. However, in practice, the party with the property ownership gets
more of the income from the settlement of the property dispute.
4. Finally, the Coase theory is limited by the lack of perfect information about both parties
involved in a property dispute which hinders its wide scale application to real-life
situations.
References:
1. Ahuja,H.L. (2016). Principles of Micro Economics. [Text Book]. S.
Chand Publications.
2. Rassure and Jagnnath (2020). Environmental Economics. [Text
Book]. Manglam Publications.
3. https://rural.gov.in/sites/default/files/nrega/Library/Books/1_MGNREGA_Act
.pdf
4. https://nsap.nic.in/
5. https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2023/5-Chapter-1-064d2
29f8419ed1.30966051.pdf
6. https://dsel.education.gov.in/rte
Long Answer Type Questions:
1. What is welfare economics? What are the factors influencing it? Write about some welfare
schemes.
2. Write about MGNREGA and NSAP.
3. Write a detailed note on pareto optimality and efficiency.
4. What do you mean by the Coase theorem? Explain it with the help of a diagram and also
write its limitations.