Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maddie Bell - Great Gatsby Essay
Maddie Bell - Great Gatsby Essay
Maddie Bell
Mr. Smith
Junior Ela
06 May 2024
In the 20th century, Francis Key Scott wrote a timeless novel, which is known by the
name of The Great Gatsby. The narrative features Jay Gatsby, a millionaire pursuing his true
love, Daisy Buchanan. However, Daisy is married to Tom Buchanan, another millionaire known
for his old money. Throughout the novel, conflict between Tom and Gatsby becomes apparent
through various arguments. The movie remake of the book, created by Baz Luhrmann, also
illustrates the ongoing conflicts between these characters. The novel, when analyzed through a
gender lens, explores the language of toxic masculinity in the ongoing fight for control over
Daisy; Luhrmann amplifies this concept by showing the extent of masculine control through
In the book, Fitzgerald uses declarative sentences to allow the reader to comprehend the
possessive relationship between Gatsby and Daisy. Tom accuses Gatsby of having an affair with
Daisy, and in return, Gatsby claims, “‘ Your wife doesn’t love you,’ said Gatsby quietly. ‘She’s
never loved you. She loves me.’ . . . ‘She never loved you, do you hear?’ he cried. ‘She only
married you because I was poor and she was tired of waiting for me. It was a terrible mistake,
but in her heart she never loved anyone except me’” (Fitzgerald 137). When Gatsby claims
Daisy’s feelings Fitzgerald uses declarative statements such as “‘She’s never loved you, do you
hear’” and “‘She only married you because I was poor and she was tired of waiting for me’”
Bell 2
(Fitzgerald 137). Through these statements, the reader can understand the aspect of control
Gatsby has over Daisy. Even though it has been five years, Gatsby is confident Daisy still loves
him, even though she is happily married to Tom. Using his confidence, Gatsby makes Daisy’s
decision without considering her opinion, allowing him to persuade and control her feelings. As
the conversation continues, Gatsby uses more declarative statements to hopefully persuade Daisy
into believing she still loves him. Tom is confused about how Gatsby and Daisy have continually
seen each other for five years. Gatsby responds, “‘No, we couldn’t meet. But both of us loved
each other all that time, old sport, and you didn’t know. I used to laugh sometimes’ . . . ‘to think
that you didn’t know’” (Fitzgerald 138). Similar to the declarative statements above, Fitzgerald
includes “‘But both of us loved each other all that time’” (Fitzgerald 138) to represent Gatsby’s
attempt at controlling Daisy’s feelings. Gatsby’s declarative statements ultimately make Daisy's
decisions for her. Even though time has passed, Gatsby declares that Daisy’s feelings of love
have not changed, making it more likely that Daisy will believe Gatsby’s lie instead of using her
true gut feelings. Despite Gatsby’s strong attempt at controlling Daisy’s feelings, he is
unsuccessful. Later in the conversation, Daisy remarks that she did love Tom because she states,
“‘Even alone I can’t say I never loved Tom’” (Fitzgerald 140), as they were happily married for
multiple years. Although Daisy is easily persuaded into believing Gatsby’s claims, as she
remembers her genuine love for Tom and the happiness he has given her, she starts to understand
represent Tom’s manipulation to control Daisy’s feelings. As Gatsby and Tom begin to argue
over Daisy, Tom becomes aggravated at his wife for having an affair with another man. Looking
Bell 3
to pry more information from Daisy, Tom asks, “‘You’ve been seeing this fellow for five years’”
(Fitzgerald 138). Tom’s questioning is typical as his partner has had a secret relationship with
another man. However, in the context of the argument between him and Gatsby, Tom’s question
comes off as manipulative. Despite Tom being Daisy’s husband, she has a right to keep her
relationship with Gatsby private. Therefore, Tom manipulates Daisy by asking her questions to
find more information about the secret relationship. Tom hopes that by asking Daisy these
specific questions, she will reveal more information about the relationship than she realizes.
However, due to Gatsby’s confidence, he chooses to disclose how long he and Daisy have been
“together” to spite Tom for marrying her. Furthermore, as the conversation carries on, Tom
continues to ask questions. Hoping to understand how Daisy could have lied to him all this time,
he says, “‘Not at Kapiolani . . . Not that day I carried you down from the Punch Bowl to keep
your shoes dry’” (Fitzgerald 139). As Tom begins to understand the relationship between Gatsby
and Daisy, he asks questions that manipulate Daisy’s feelings. Tom’s short leading questions
almost make Daisy feel bad about having an affair with Gatsby. Tom questions Daisy by using
moments in their relationship where she did love him, causing her to revisit her true feelings of
love. Towards the end of the conversation, Daisy reveals that she did love Tom despite the
In the movie, Luhrmann utilizes visuals and dialogue to amplify the concept of masculine
control over Daisy, allowing the viewer to understand the dynamic of her relationships with Tom
and Gatsby. In the hotel scene, after Tom reveals to Gatsby that he knows about their affair, Tom
questions Daisy angrily. However, Gatsby takes it upon himself to answer the questions,
knowing Daisy will not answer. After hearing Gatsby’s response, Tom laughs in Gatsby’s face
Bell 4
because he does not believe the “relationship” Gatsby claims between him and Daisy. Although
feeling threatened by Gatsby, Tom sternly declares Daisy’s love for him. Later in this scene, Tom
uses an upset tone when asking leading questions to Daisy making her feel bad about what she
has done despite their marriage. Luhrumann’s usage of different tones in Tom’s character
strengthens the concept of masculine control because the tone change represents that Tom cares
about his relationship with Daisy, and if he were to lose control of his wife he would be angry as
he lived all this time believing Daisy was his own. However, Gatsby claims Daisy has
continually loved him for years and Tom responds to Gatsby by laughing at his face. Tom is
happily married to Daisy, and he believes Daisy is entirely in love with him. Tom’s assumption
gives him enough confidence to laugh in Gatsby’s face and then claim Daisy loves him using an
assertive tone. Although they both argue for Daisy’s love in this conversation, Gatsby and Tom
fulfill the masculine role within a relationship in the 20th century. They project their own opinion
onto their significant other, which, in this case, is Daisy. As Tom and Gatsby argue about their
relationships with Daisy, Gatsby becomes infuriated. Additionally, Gatsby’s face becomes
noticeably red as he starts yelling after Tom claims will take better care of Daisy. Using his
pent-up anger, Gatsby throws his glass at the wall and then grabs Tom by the collar, coming
close to punching him in the face. Gatsby quickly realizes his outburst, and Tom begins to laugh
evilly as Gatsby has gone too far by losing his temper. Gatsby is so adamant about Daisy loving
him that he reacts physically as Tom is claiming Daisy is happy in their marriage. The fight for
control over Daisy causes Gatsby to lose his temper completely, visually showing the viewer
Gatsby cares for Daisy. However, Tom’s evil laugh shows his happiness as he knows he is under
Gatsby’s skin and has some form of control over Daisy. The visual aspect of the movie illustrates
Bell 5
this scene very differently from how a reader may interpret it. Visually, since there are real
people bringing emotion into this scene, the audience can better understand the large emotions
both Tom and Gatsby experience in their struggle for control over Daisy. Differently, the novel
allows the reader to interpret the arguments based on the language Fitzgerald uses as there aren’t
Through a gender lens, the novel explores the language of toxic masculinity in the
constant struggle for control over Daisy; similarly, Luhrmann visually conveys the level of male
dominance over Daisy, which further illustrates this concept. Although Fitzgerlad presents the
story through a novel and Luhrmann through a movie, overall, both accurately depict the typical