Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Online Public Space and Popular Ethos in China Shubo Li Media Culture Society
The Online Public Space and Popular Ethos in China Shubo Li Media Culture Society
com/
Culture & Society
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Media, Culture & Society can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://mcs.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://mcs.sagepub.com/content/32/1/63.refs.html
What is This?
Online public space refers to the emerging online venues where people could
either discuss in groups or be the audience of public discussions. Online
forums, which used to be called Bulletin Board Systems (BBS), is a major
type of online public space in China. There are 321 million Chinese-speaking
people on the internet (Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2008) and the topics of
online public discussion are diverse, many public forums are dominated by
trivial discussions. For example, gossip about freaks personalities, or celebrity
scandals, or conjectures on legal cases, would make sensational topics on
the web. Is this because the Chinese people especially enjoy gossip rather
than serious discussion on public matters? Can these online forums filled
with gossip be called an online public sphere? How to make sense of the
discrepancies between the idea of e-public sphere and the reality of online
public space? This research aims to figure out answers to these questions.
The republican ideal of public sees the ‘public’ realm in terms of political
community and citizenship, analytically distinct from both the market and the
administrative state (Weintraub, 1997: 7). As Aristotle in Politics (350 BC)
argues; a city-state is a body of citizens who are entitled to participate in the
deliberative or judicial administration of the community (Aristotle, 2006: 29),
the republican model of publicness tries to understand the political within the
world of discussion, deliberation and collective action. Habermas’s idea of ‘a
normative, autonomous public space independent of the market and the state’
(Habermas, 2000 [1973]: 288) is central to any debate on publicness in the
context of modern societies.
Is online publicness a different matter? On the internet, a public is not
embodied by physical forms of people but by signs and representations, the
Media, Culture & Society © 2010 SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New
Delhi and Singapore), Vol. 32(1): 63–83
[ISSN: 0163-4437 DOI: 10.1177/0163443709350098]
State ownership determines the culture-scape of the Chinese web. The Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) state is the biggest proponent and developer of the
internet in China. Open Net Initiatives (ONI) reports that:
Table 1 shows that the seven IAPs are either state-owned or state holding
companies, under direct supervision of major government ministries, which
TABLE 1
Ownership of the seven Chinese IAPs
IAPs Ownership/biggest shareholders Capacity
(band-width)
CHINANET China Telecom Corporation 135321M
(a state-owned company).
China Netcom China Netcom (a state holding company 89665M
(CNC) which is quoted on the New York and
Hong Kong stock markets); its four biggest
shareholders are: (1) China Academy of Science
(CAS); (2) the State Administration of Radio
Film and Television (SARF), an executive
branch of the State Council that administers
and supervises state-owned enterprises
engaged in the television, radio and film
industries; (3) the Ministry of Railways; and
(4) the Shanghai municipal government.
China Science Non-profit network, under the administration of 17510M
Net (CSTNET) the Science Computer and Network Center
of CAS.
CERNET A state-owned network under the administration 4796M
of the Ministry of Education.
China Mobile Chinamobile Corporation (a state holding 5750M
Net (CMNET) company based on the business of Guandong
Mobile Communication Bureau and Zhejiang
Mobile Communication Bureau of the former
Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications),
which has been quoted on the New York and
Hong Kong stock exchange since 1997.
UNINET China Unicom (a state holding public company, 3652M
traded on the Shanghai, Hong Kong and
New York markets)
CIETNET China International Electronic Commerce 2M
Center, affiliated to the Ministry of Foreign
Trade and Commerce.
Total capacity of band-width 256696M
Source: CNNIC (2007a) and the companies’ websites.
The formation of the online public discussion space can be seen as going
through three stages: the era of telnet-based BBS from 1997 to 1998; the era
of web-based liberal BBS from 1998 to 2000; and the era of public forums
from 2000 to the present.
CFidoNet, a branch of the international amateur telnet-based BBS network
CFido, was the first and largest BBS network in China, accommodating over
10,000 users at its peak in 1997. Sixty-three percent of its nodes (BBS
stations) were set up in south-eastern China where the market economy was
booming and political climate was liberal. CFido BBS operators and users
had more wealth and technical savvy than their compatriots. They wanted to
build an indigenous ‘civil information and electronic culture’ (Luo, 1997).
Although CFido went into decline with the advent of the internet, its idealistic
mission was carried on by the early web-based BBSs and forums, most of
which were also set up in the south-east, where the vibrant folk computer
community had prepared the market for the internet service.
Many of the early BBS operators and users were from the social elite –
well-educated, well-paid and well-read. They were ambitious to create a new
public culture, explicitly aiming for civic virtue, which ‘enshrines free
institutions outside the state’ (Prochaska, 2002: 7). The slogan of Kstar, a major
forum, was ‘Sincerity, Reason, and Openness’. Moderators, mostly young
intellectuals invited to do the job unpaid, on a voluntary basis, were usually
open-minded and adopted a democratic approach in dealing with opponents and
confrontations. A moderator of SZBBS, the earliest BBS in China, once said:
‘the BBS is a precious place where people can think and speak freely … there
should not be many rules to prevent people from doing so’ (Xue, 1997). Online
venues focusing on leisure activities achieved huge popularity. Srsnet, Xici
Alleys, Netsh.com and Netease were the major popular BBSs of that time. Srsnet
was famous for its sub-forums featuring sports, wuxia novel and photography
discussions. Xici and Netsh enabled users to set up their own discussion boards,
facilitating small and covert group communication. The political, academic and
religious discussion groups of Xici survived a little longer than such groups did
at other public online venues. Xici had groups such as the Democracy Forum
(min zhu lun tan) focusing on China’s political reform, the Liberalism Forum (zi
you lun tan) on political philosophy, the Plane of Thinking (Si xiang de jing jie)
on Western political theories, and St Paul’s Cathedral (sheng bao luo jiao tang)
on Christianity; it was unusual to find such groups on the Chinese web.
Another type of popular liberal BBS at that time was campus BBS set up by
students utilizing university resources. It staged discussions on youth hobbies,
academic interests and public affairs, which attracted not only students but also
people from the general public.2
Public forums emerged from the year 2000 with a rapid increase of the online
population. Large audiences gathered in online venues such as Tianya BBS and
Sina Forum. In the meantime, Chinese intellectuals were keen to establish their
online platform of free expression. In 2000, a literary magazine Tianya launched
its own online forum, Tianya Scope, attached to Tianya BBS, to improve its
interaction with readers, and to provide a venue for debate for intellectuals
(Interview 12, see Appendix; Zhang, 2001). In less than a year, Tianya Scope
was deemed the best online forum of 2001 in terms of generating cutting-edge
discussions (Lei, 2003). Tianya BBS benefited from Tianya Scope’s reputation
and grew into one of the largest public forums. The migration, flowing from
Tianya Scope and other liberal BB to Tianya BBS between 2001 and 2002 after
the government's banning those websites, produced in Tianya BBS a combined
membership which was half intellectual and half plebeian. The narrating
process in the BBS hence began to develop popular qualities. Its current affairs
sub-forum, Heaven’s Matter Teahouse, was then ‘a square of public carnival, in
which everyone is both performer and spectator. The time of folk festival
arrived’ (Chen, 2002).
Democracy was a major appeal of public forums between 2000 and 2003.
First, with the enlargement of the scale of forum’s public, members were
demanding fairness and justice in the forum administration. The election of
moderators was launched in Tianya BBS (Interview 1, see Appendix; Wang
and Jiang, 2004). Protests were organized to criticize moderators’
inappropriate approaches in both Tianya BBS and Sina Forum, leading to a
more democratic mechanism being implemented in the forums. Second,
offline collective actions, such as regional gatherings and public seminars,
were frequently organized in major cities throughout the year 2003, linking
academia and the public (Interview 2, see Appendix; Zhao, 2003). Third,
open-letter signing and online petitions were frequently organized and
spread all over the Chinese web. In the aftermath of 11 September 2001,
1015 people signed an ‘Open Letter to President Bush and the People of
America’, drafted by Ren-bu-mei from Heaven’s Matter Teahouse, expressing
their condolences to America people and condemning the terrorism. The first
online petition was launched July 2002 from Heaven’s Matter Teahouse, to
protest against the newly issued ‘Provisional Regulation on the Administration
of Internet’ (General Administration of Press and Publications [GAPP] and
MII, 2002), with around 200 people signing their real names (Interview 1,
see Appendix). The largest petition was launched December 2002, calling
for the release of Liu Di, a member of Xici’s Democracy Forum arrested
during that year. Nearly 4000 people from all over the Chinese web signed
the petition (Wang, 2003; Yang, 2005).
The online and offline public space began to converge from 2003. There
was an emergent online quasi-public sphere in which major forums and
influential online writers formed the centrepiece. Liberal offline media
adapted to the situation by inviting the best online writers to contribute to
offline publications (Interview 1, see Appendix). Chinese intellectuals and
public figures began joining the chorus on the web, participating in online
political activities. Although they were not a fixture in online discussions,
they regarded major online forums as a platform to publicize radical
writing that could not be published in traditional media. Some even initiated
petitions themselves.3 Online and offline media began cooperating to extend
the influence of this newly formed public space, for example in the case of
Sun Zhi-gang (see Xiao, 2004, Beach, 2005, Tai, 2006: 259-264). Having
The Chinese web is a gendered place. The content found in Cfido’s e-zine
Dragon Voice are mostly on computers, the stock market and football games,
reflecting the distinctly male interests of the early BBS users. The same can
be said of Srsnet BBS. In its most popular sub-forum, Sports Salon, the
language style preferred was brassy, assertive and tough. Popular posts were
those displaying masculine strength, dotted with shouting, swearing, sarcasm
and symbolic violence. Posts of this style are called brick-posts (ban zhuan),
which aim to attack using well-structured criticism. Bricks are commonplace
weapon used in Beijing’s young rascals’ street fighting. The term’s online
popularity dates back to 1997, when a member launched a ‘Free-Speaking
Movement of Proletarians’, justifying the use of ‘bricks’, ‘brick-hurling’ and
other street talk in forum communication (Wei-yi-xiao, 2002). Brick-posts
often targeted celebrities and sometimes well-known members of the forum.
Writing brick-posts was more of an entertaining pastime than a purposeful
action. The stress of daily life might be the driving force of ‘brick-fighting’.
A member of Srsnet forum confessed that:
Would you dare to shout at your boss in the office or your wife at home or the
police in the street? But you can insult anyone on the football field and in the
forum, and you would be admired if you did it – cool! (Cong-liang-fei-bing, 2005)
The convergence of online and offline public space leads to the convergence
of online and offline censorship. Since the implementation of the ‘Regulations
of the People’s Republic of China for Safety Protection of Computer
registration online database run by the MII (MII, 2005a; State Council, 2000).
Another MII directive issued 2005 defines the IP address of each computer
connecting to the internet as a subject of regulation (MII, 2005b).
These administrative guidelines are compulsory and enforced by local
governments, even though internet users who have paid for their usage of
internet services are by no means a natural subject of the administrative power
of the government. Acquiring and monitoring internet users’ information in
order to discipline them, without the consent of the People’s Congress, which
represents the people’s rights, is arguably an abuse of the state’s power.
The guidelines delegate the responsibility for censoring online activities to
ISPs and ICPs, by threatening them with penalties and suspension of the
services. In this way, the state blackmailed the ISPs and ICPs into self-
censorship. Major public forums have to develop a system which requires the
moderator to internalize the principle of security into the everyday monitoring
of the forum, and to act as gatekeeper for all online activities there. Tianya
BBS employed a dozen full-time sub-editors to pre-censor the posts, in
addition to its hundreds of part-time moderators in the numerous sub-forums.
The Internet Monitor Office of local police bureau gave updates through direct
telephone calls to the BBS administrator and at times to sub-editors (Interview
with Wu You, 2004). Moderators in Tianya BBS began to rationalize the
situation. For example, a moderator contended that moderators should respect
the delegated power and fully follow the censorship system by carefully
checking every post before allowing it to be publicized, claiming that ‘the rule
in chaotic times should be tough’ (Chen-yu, 2003). Moderators who resisted
the self-censorship system left their positions. Public forums began to
implement more strict editorial interference, which gradually narrowed the
fundamental distinction between BBSs and traditional media, as online and
offline media assimilated each other’s style and tended towards convergence
(Wang and Jiang, 2004). Consequently, those who once enjoyed the freedom
were disappointed, and steered toward smaller but freer forums, which
significantly harmed the influence of major public forums as a public venue.
The persecution of dissidents and polemic websites has become harsher since
2003. The number of people arrested for online activities surged from three in
2001 to 62 in 2005 (Reporters Without Borders, 2005a, 2005b). In 2005, 11
influential online forums were permanently closed.5 The constraints imposed
upon the Chinese universities and research institutions’ network (CERNET) were
also tightened. As CERNET is not under the direct rule of local governments, it
used to provide a more liberal online discussion milieu, which attracted a huge
public. However, it has been deprived of this privilege since 2005 when the
Ministry of Education ordered that external IPs should be banned from university
BBSs (Bao, 2005; Hu-hua, 2005). Hence university forums were reduced from
a public place to an internal place for students’ social use.
Another approach to reducing the influence of the online public sphere by the
state is to initiate media hype. Reports on ‘online pornography’ (Chengdu
It can be postulated that the all of the four major agencies in the field of
Chinese Internet, the state, the market consisting of the ISP, ICP, the social
elite, and the folk society, are deeply engaged in a process of creating a
national cyberspace. The Party-state, who exercises the strongest influence
over the shaping of the Chinese web and the public ethos, seeks to control
the dissemination of political disputes, and to maintain a unified, stabilized
nation. Rather than to have a monopoly of information in China, the
regime’s ambition seems lesser but more decisive: the containment of the
vibrant civil society. It encourages, from time to time, the development of
the Internet in China. The market, or the proprietors of websites and dotcoms
and owners of IT companies, once were committed to establishing a E-civil
culture of the Chinese people, but later have to come to terms with the
governmental constraints so as to stay in business. The social elites, once
were overtly promoting e-democracy in China, now either withdraw to
smaller and safer online venues, or collaborate with the market to create dose
that could gratify the populace’s need for entertainment. The folk society, the
central figure of the Chinese web, once demonstrated the aspiration for civic
virtue as well as the capacity to organize democratic practices and to
generate deliberative discussions, now is preoccupied with a crave for mind-
paralyzing fun time. Alongside the prevalence of trivial gossips, a popular
nationalism seems to be the predominant bond that connects the individual
to the public and the national.
All of these mechanisms seem to be working in producing and reproducing
a strong national identity. However, before we become forgetful about the
early years of the Chinese Internet, one could remain skeptical toward the
genuineness of the national identity.
Evidences show that there had been an inclusive electronic public space
that accommodated pertinent, vigorous deliberative debates on public
matters. It was then effectively sabotaged by the state, by repeatedly
suspending, dividing and harming online public venues, until the folk
discourse is no longer able to carry deliberative discussions on public matters
apart from unreflective nationalism and popular prejudices. Alongside the
well-known Great Fire Wall blocks and filters, a less obvious but very central
part of political control is to curb the nascent public ethos. It becomes an
irony that a party-state has aspired to strength for so long a time, sees
weakening its people’s ethos as an unavoidable strategy. Even though
people’s efforts to restore the impaired online public ethos have never ceased,
the future of an open public speaking corner is still bleak.
Acknowledgement
This article is based on part of my PhD project funded by the Communication and
Research Institute at the University of Westminster. I am forever grateful to
CAMRI for sponsoring my research and providing an exciting environment for
learning.
List of interviews
Position in relation to
Interviewee Tianya Forum Gender Time Location Manner
1 CYM Former moderator M 20 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face-to-face
1 pm–5 pm
2 ZDJ Member M 20 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face to face
6 pm–8 pm
3 TJ Member, former M 19 Jul. 2004 Guangzhou MSN
moderator 9 pm–11 pm
4 FWDX Member, former F 22 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face-to-face
moderator 11 am–2 pm
5 LGS Member F 23 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face-to-face
11 am–13 pm group
6 LDD Member F 23 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face-to-face
11 am–13 pm group
7 FWDX Member and former F 23 Nov. 2004 Beijing Face-to-face
moderator 11 am–13 pm group
8 LT Former administrator M 29 Nov. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
9.30 am–12 am
9 ZLG Moderator, former M 29 Nov. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
administrator 2 pm–4 pm
(Continued)
APPENDIX
(Continued)
Position in relation to
Interviewee Tianya Forum Gender Time Location Manner
13 TM Tianya.com M 1 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-face
2 pm–4 pm
14 XM Owner of M 1 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
Tianya.com 9 pm–12 pm
15 XL Moderator M 2 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
12 am–1 pm group
16 WY Director of content, chief M 2 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
administrator 12 am–1 pm group
17 ZLG Moderator, former M 2 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
administrator 5.30 pm–8 pm
18 DXFS Moderator, administrator M 3 Dec. 2004 Haikou Face-to-face
6 pm–7 pm
Li, The online public space and popular ethos in China
Notes
References
Kluver, R. (2001) ‘New Media and the End of Nationalism: China and the US in a War
of Words’, URL (consulted June 2005): http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/MotsPluriels/
MP1801ak.html
Lei, L.G. (2003) ‘The Five Years Expedition of Net-Literature in China’, URL (consulted
July 2004): http://www4.tianyaclub.com/new/TechForum/Content.asp?idWriter=0
&Key=0&idItem=174&idArticle=435241
Liu, Shih-Diing (2006) ‘China’s Popular Nationalism on the Internet: Report on the
2005 Anti-Japan Network Struggle’, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 7(1): 144–55.
Luo, R. (1997) ‘Greetings Speech’ (in Chinese), Dragon Voice 28 March: 1, URL
(consulted March 2007): http://www.cfido.com/mag/txt/mag001.txt
Matei, S. and S. Ball-Rokeach (2003) ‘The Internet in the Communication Infrastructure
of Urban Residential Communities: Meso or Macro-linkage?’, Journal of
Communication 53(4): 642–57.
Ministry of Culture (MOC) (2003) ‘The Provisional Regulation on Managing the Internet
Culture’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.ccnt.gov.cn/zcfg/bugz/
t20060329_25185.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (1998) ‘Circular about Implementing the License
System of Computer Information Network and Internet Service’ (in Chinese), URL
(consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2003/11/27/1483.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (2000) ‘Regulation on Managing the Internet
Electronic Bulletin Board System Service’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted June
2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2000/10/08/0653.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (2001) ‘Circular about Further Improving the
Administration of Issuing License for Internet Information Service and Electronic
Bulletin Board Service’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.
cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2003/12/12/1996.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (2003) ‘Announcement by PR China Ministry
of Information Industry on Strengthening the Administration of Internet Domain
Name Registration’ (in Chinese), issued July 31, URL (consulted June 2008):
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2004/08/02/2432.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (2004) ‘MII Order No.30: Measures of
Administration of the Internet Domain Name in China’ (in Chinese), issued
September 28, effective since 20 December 2004, URL (consulted June 2008):
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2004/11/25/2592.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII) (2005a) ‘MII Order 33: Guidance of
Administration and Registration of Non-commercial Internet Information Services
issued 8 Feb.’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.cnnic.cn/html/
Dir/2005/02/25/2782.htm
Ministry for Information Industry (MII) (2005b) ‘MII Order 34: Guidance of the
Registration of IP address’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted May 2007): //www.cnnic.cn/
html/Dir/2005/02/25/2783.htm
Ministry of Information Industry (MII), Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of Culture,
State Administration for Industry and Commerce (2001) ‘Measures on the
Administration of Business Sites of Internet Access Services’ (in Chinese), out of
effect since 15 November 2002, URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
html/Dir/2003/12/12/1995.htm
Ministry of Public Health (2001) ‘Measures for Managing the Internet Medical & Health
Information Service’(in Chinese), URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
html/Dir/2003/12/12/1998.htm
Ministry of Public Security of PRC (1997) ‘Computer Information Network and
Internet Security, Protection and Management Regulations’ (in Chinese), URL
(consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/1997/12/11/0650.htm
State Council Information Office (SCIO) and Ministry of Information Industry (MII)
(2000) ‘Interim Provisions on the Administration of Internet Websites’ Engaging in
News Publication Services’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.
isc.org.cn/20020417/ca42718.htm
State Council Information Office (SCIO) and Ministry of Information Industry (MII)
(2005) ‘Regulations of News Internet Information Service’ (in Chinese), URL
(consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2005/09/27/3184.htm
State Pharmaceutical Administration (2001) ‘The Provisional Regulation on Managing
Medicine Information on the Internet’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted June 2008):
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2003/12/12/1997.htm
State Secrecy Bureau (2000) ‘Administration of the Maintenance of Secrets in the
International Networking of Computer Information Systems Provisions’ (in Chinese),
URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2003/11/27/1482.htm
Tai, Z.X. (2006), The Internet in China: cyberspace and civil society, Routledge studies in
new media and cyberculture, CRC Press.
Wang, P. (2001) ‘Memorial Collection of BHNA: Black Killer’s Works’ (in Chinese), URL
(consulted December 2006): http://bbs2.xilubbs.com/cgi-bin/bbs/view?forum=nutshell&
message=49
Wang, Y. (2003) ‘Conquering Our Fear with Our Voices’ (in Chinese), Epoch Times
14 November, URL (consulted March 2005): www.epochtimes.com/gb/3/11/14/
n411214.htm
Wang, Y. and D. Jiang (2004) ‘The Internet and Freedom of Speech in China’ (in
Chinese), URL (consulted March 2005): http://www.peacehall.com/news/gb/china/
2004/08/200408221344.shtml
Weintraub, J. (1997) ‘Public/Private: The Limitations of a Grand Dichotomy’, pp. 1–43
in J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice:
Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wei-yi-xiao (2002) ‘The Happy Bricks’ (in Chinese), online discussion, URL (consulted
March 2007): http://paowang.com/news/3/2006–06–06/20060606222958.html
Xiao, Q. (2004), ‘The Rising Tide of Internet Opinion in China’ Nieman Reports,
Harvard University, URL (consulted October 2009): http://www.nieman.harvard
.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100852
Xiao, Q. (2005) ‘Student Protest Restrictions on Most Influential BBS’, China Digital
Times, URL (consulted March 2005): http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2005/03/
students_protes.php
Xinhua News Agency (2005) ‘Investigating into the Internet Crime in China’ (in Chinese),
URL (consulted June 2008): http://news.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2005–08/19/
content_3376278.htm 282
Xu, Z.Y., T. Biao and Y. Jiang (2003) ‘The Proposal of Revisiting the 1982 Regulation on
“Custody and Repatriation of Homeless Beggars”’ (in Chinese), at China Protecting
Rights Alliance, URL (consulted March 2005): http://www.wqyd.org/bbs/viewthread.
php?tid=282
Xue, Z.F. (StevenX@SZBBS) (1997) ‘Also on Flaming at SZBBS’ (in Chinese), online
discussion, URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.stevenxue.com/st_26.htm
Yan Zhao Metropolitan Daily (2005) ‘A 15-year-old Addicted to the Internet Stabbed
Mother with a Knife’ (in Chinese), 9 August, URL (consulted June 2008): http://games.
sina.com.cn/y/n/2005–08–09/1653120990.shtml
Yang, Y.B. (2005) ‘Qian-ming.com and the Dissemination of Citizens’ Political
Views’ (in Chinese),ChinaeWeekly.com 7 February, URL (consulted March 2007):
http://www.chinaeweekly.com/viewarticle_gb.aspx?vid=848
Zhang, L.G. (2001) ‘Interview with Li Shao-jun the Editor of Tianya: The Fire of Free
Thinking Burning from the Internet’ (in Chinese), URL (consulted March 2005):
http://www.booker.com.cn/big5/paper18/16/class001800010/hwz125564.htm
Zhao, D.G. (2003) ‘Political Participation in Folk Society and Forum Members’
Gathering’, Boxun.com (originally published in New Observer Forum) 3 September,
URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.boxun.com/hero/zhaodagong/222_1.shtml
Zittrain, J. and B. Edelman (2003) ‘Empirical Analysis of Internet Filtering in China’,
URL (consulted May 2003): http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/