Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Çocuk Edebiyatı by 2 2
Çocuk Edebiyatı by 2 2
On the second story, it is different from the first one. She obeys her mother in this story. She amuses
herself outside of the path, and it is a sign of her carelessness. Forest is a dangerous place, but she
forgets about the grandmother. Time passes, and it becomes night. Her encounter with the wolf is
becasue of her mistake. She did not follow mother’s orders. The girl is cooking the meat of the
grandmother, and she does not enjoys the food. She does not want to play into the wolf’s fantasy. In
this version, she saves herself. She escapes from the wolf with her intelligence.We have a happy
ending.
Week 4
In this story, we have a name for the wolf. Our girl also wants to experience wordly pleasure
because she says “where should I put my apron?” She is not stupid. She is enjoying dancing
with the danger itself. It would be persuassive to be a female fantasy. In this one, it ends
possitively. Threat comes from a male persona. We have different kinds of the story. One of
them is male fantasy, and the other is didactic.
PAGE 91- This is the first version of story in 1697. The male version of the witch was
werewolf. It was in medeival times. The wolf is now a neighbour.
Week 5
She could save herself from the wolf with her intelligence, but in Charles Weros version, the
girl is portrayed naiv and someone who cannot save herself when she encounters a danger.
She is Victorian Era woman as angel in the house. In this version, children are helpless, and
they need the help of someone who is older than them. Girl is portrayed helpless who leads
the house in the house. In the first oral forms, the girl repeatedly asks what to take out off
her dress. It seemed she also enjoyed the fantasy.
WEEK 6
Little Golden Hood by Charles Marelle
Page 193- Oral versions were shorter than this one. We did not have a hunter in the oral
versions. She gets eaten in oral versions. Charles Perov wrote it for the bourgeosie class, and
it was for moral education for children. Wolf was with bad intentions and outside of
bourgeosie class. Girl was discribed as not a clever person.
Charles’ version is about education for children. In this one, we have a Frame Narrative. We
have a voice telling us in the beginning. The Gold Hood represents the pureness of her
hearth. She does not want a sin. Because of the Red Hood, she had a sin, but she is not here.
The function of hood changes into protection. The Grondmother is protective, and she
catchs the wolf as soon as she sees it. In this version, we have a friend wolf. He looks more
younger. Wolf is like a small dog. It is not big. It is less threatening. The wolf is like
anthropomorthized. At the end, she is scolded by her parents, and she promises that she
will not do it again. It is like a test for her because her mother says let us see how you will do
it alone. The mother is instructing the girl. However, she still talks to wolf in a naive way.
Another mistake is taht she spends so much time outside the path. The good behaviours
are given by the parents, and they are expected to be obeyed.