Expansion Joint Repair CRS

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

DOCUMENT TITTLE: METHOD STATEMENT RISK ASSESSMENT FOR EXPANSION JOINT REPAIR Rev.

02
DOCUMENT NUMBER: TR‐147_PJT 1 & PJT_3 M/S
CLIENT: EMPOWER ENERGY SOLUTIONS
CONSULTANT: YOUNG ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY SERVICES
CONTRACTOR: LEADERS FORT CONTRACTING

COMPLIANCE STATEMENT AND RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


SN TYPE COMMENTS TOPICS COMMENTS CONTRACTOR’S REPLY Comply REMARKS
FROM Yes No
Task methodology Working level not mentioned also please refer the The Expansion Joints located at Ground Floor, Mezzanine and Roof Yes
CLIENT comments mentioned below, please elaborate task Floor.
methodology which also assessed for making RA.
1 Method As per site assessment the maximum height of the scaffolding to build
Statement
inside the Plant is 9.5 meters and 4.5 meters outside the building for
the repairing of the Expansion Joint. Clause 5.2.1,
Page 6
Storage and usage quantity to be mentioned along The quantity of materials to be delivered at site will be as per daily usage Yes N
CLIENT with storage plan. If intended to be stored inside only, no chemical materials will be stored at site
Task methodology
plant, joint inspection with Empower HSE to be
initiated by PMO.
CLIENT The MS has been amended and has addressed scaffolding as well and it Yes MS document
Relevance as per tasks in RA shall address all activities as per MS ‐ Revised RA
has been incorporated in task activities. clause 5.2.1
MS mentioned scaffolding ‐ MS not mentioned
2 Risk page 6
Assessment CLIENT lifting operation is not part of the expansion joint task but rather an activity to Yes
Relevance as per tasks in RA shall address all activities as per MS ‐ Revised RA deliver materials to the basement by use of hoist bucket located at the
MS mentioned lifting operation ‐ MS not mentioned entrance of the plant. The risk assessment addressed both task hazards
and plant hazards.
CLIENT There were 2 RA submitted along with 1 MS ‐ Reviewer please revise the re-submitted document only 1 RA was submitted and Yes
Relevance as per tasks in could not review the RA‐ Revised RA mentioned "the about the lifting and lowering operations it’s the bucket hoist to deliver
MS plant operator should be in charge of lifting and lowering materials to the basement area and it will be done by the plant operator
operations" Please clarify
CLIENT There were 2 RA submitted along with 1 MS ‐ Reviewer please revise the re-submitted document only 1 RA was submitted and Yes MS document
Relevance as per tasks in
could not review the RA‐ Revised RA mentioned about scaffolding the MS has been amended and scaffolding activity clause 5.2.1
MS incorporated
scaffolding ‐ MS not mentioned page 6
CLIENT mentioned as per approved SDS Yes RA document
PPE Please mention as per SDS‐ Not done
page 2
4 HSE Legal CLIENT Relevant DM code of please revise the re-submitted document the electric chapter was Yes RA document
Amend if electrical chapter as per relevance based on
requirements constructions chapters incorporated under DM
revised MS !!
with name and numbers code of
SN TYPE COMMENTS TOPICS COMMENTS CONTRACTOR’S REPLY Comply REMARKS
FROM Yes No
construction
table page 10

You might also like