Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM - Chapter-3
HRM - Chapter-3
CHAPTER 3
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
1. Lack of Ability: Some managers may lack the necessary skills or expertise to
conduct effective performance appraisals. They may struggle with giving
constructive feedback, setting clear performance expectations, or accurately
evaluating employee performance.
2. Lack of Training: Managers who haven't received proper training in performance
appraisal techniques may encounter difficulties in conducting fair and objective
evaluations. Without training, they may fall back on subjective judgments or use
inappropriate appraisal methods.
3. Central Tendency: This issue occurs when managers rate most employees as
average or close to the midpoint of the rating scale. It reflects an unwillingness to
differentiate between employees, leading to inflated performance ratings for some
and deflated ratings for others, which skews the overall assessment.
4. Lot of Errors: Performance appraisals can be prone to various errors, such as
recency bias (placing undue emphasis on recent events), leniency or strictness bias
(consistently rating employees either high or low), and contrast effect (rating an
employee based on comparison with others rather than individual performance).
5. Biased Effect: Bias in performance appraisal can occur due to personal
preferences, prejudices, or stereotypes, affecting how employees are assessed. This
can lead to unfair evaluations and impact employee morale and motivation.
6. Stress: Employees may experience stress and anxiety around the time of their
performance appraisal. The fear of negative feedback or unfair evaluations can
create a tense work environment, impacting overall job satisfaction and
performance.
7. Lack of Understanding: If employees do not fully understand the appraisal
process, its purpose, or the criteria used to evaluate their performance, they may
feel disengaged or unmotivated to participate actively in the process.
8. Halo Effect: The halo effect occurs when a manager's overall positive or negative
impression of an employee influences their assessment across all performance
dimensions. For example, if a manager has a positive perception of an employee's
personality, they may rate the employee higher on all performance aspects, even if
not warranted.
1. Traditional Methods
I. Graphic Rating Scales: This method involves a scale that lists several traits and a
range of performance for each. The supervisor rates each subordinate on factors
such as quality of work, initiative, reliability, cooperation, etc.
II. Ranking Method: Employees in a particular department or at a certain job level
are ranked from best to worst or vice versa. This comparative method allows easy
identification of high and low performers but doesn't indicate how much better or
worse one employee is compared to another.
III. Paired Comparison: A technique where every employee in a group is compared
with every other employee in pairwise fashion. It's more precise than simple
ranking but can be time-consuming for large groups.
IV. Forced Distribution: This is similar to grading on a curve. Predetermined
proportions of employees are categorized into categories like 'high performers',
'average performers', 'low performers'.
V. Critical Incident Method: It involves recording examples of effective and
ineffective behavior of employees during their performance period.
VI. Essay Method: The evaluator writes a brief narrative describing an employee's
performance. This can provide rich qualitative data, but can be subjective and time-
consuming.
2. Modern Methods
I. Management by Objectives (MBO): Instead of focusing on personal traits, this
method centres on results. Specific objectives are set for each employee and the
employee is evaluated on the fulfillment of these objectives.
II. 360-Degree Feedback: In this system, an individual's performance is evaluated by
several people like immediate supervisors, team members, customers, peers, and
the individuals themselves (self-assessment). This gives a comprehensive view of
an employee's performance.
III. Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS): This method combines
elements of traditional rating scales with specific behavioral examples. It focuses
on definite behaviors that lead to job success.
What is compensation
Compensation, in a general sense, refers to the sum of all the financial and non-
financial rewards that employees receive in exchange for their work, time, and
contributions to an organization. It encompasses various elements of remuneration
and benefits provided to employees as a part of their employment package.
Basic Salary: Basic salary, also known as base salary or fixed salary, is the fixed
amount of money paid to an employee for their regular work hours, excluding any
additional bonuses, incentives, overtime pay, or other allowances. It is the core
component of an employee's compensation package and serves as the foundation
upon which other benefits and allowances are calculated.
Forms of pay
Forms of pay refer to the various ways in which employees can be compensated
for their work and services provided to an organization. Different forms of pay may
be used to suit the specific needs of the organization and the preferences of the
employees. Some common forms of pay include: Base Salary, Hourly Wages:
Bonuses, Commissions, Incentives Overtime Pay, Shift Differentials, Piece Rate
Pay, Profit Sharing Stock Options or Equity, Allowances, Performance-Based Pay
Benefits, Recognition and Rewards Programs.
1. Internal Factors:
a. Organizational Strategy: The compensation strategy is aligned with the
organization's overall strategic goals and objectives. For example, if the company
aims to attract top talent, it may offer competitive salaries and benefits.
b. Financial Position: The financial health and performance of the organization
impact its ability to provide competitive compensation packages. Profitable
companies may have more resources for higher salaries and bonuses.
c. Job Evaluation: The organization assesses the relative value of different jobs
through job evaluation methods. Jobs with higher complexity, responsibility, and
skill requirements may receive higher compensation.
d. Pay Structure and Policy: The internal pay structure and policies guide how
compensation is determined for different job levels and positions within the
organization.
1. Conduct a Job Analysis: The first step is to conduct a thorough job analysis to
understand the tasks, responsibilities, and requirements of each job role within the
organization. This will help in determining the relative value or worth of each job.
2. Job Evaluation: Once job analysis is complete, job evaluation is done to rank jobs
in terms of their complexity, skill requirements, responsibility level, and overall
importance to the organization. This helps in establishing a hierarchical structure
of jobs and their relative pay levels.
3. Market Pay Surveys: Conducting market pay surveys helps organizations
understand the prevailing market rates for various job roles. This involves
researching what competitors and similar industries are paying for comparable
roles.
4. Develop a Pay Structure: Based on the job evaluation and market pay surveys, a
pay structure is developed. This structure typically includes a range of pay grades
or bands, with each grade having a minimum, mid-point, and maximum pay rate.
Each job is then assigned to a specific pay grade based on its relative worth within
the organization.
5. Establish Pay Policies: Organizations also need to establish pay policies that
determine how employees move within the pay structure, including policies for pay
raises, promotions, bonuses, and other forms of compensation.
6. Consider Legal Compliance: Compliance with legal requirements, such as
minimum wage laws, overtime regulations, and equal pay legislation, is essential
in establishing pay rates.
7. Review and Update Regularly: Compensation is not a set-it-and-forget-it aspect
of business. It's essential to regularly review and update pay rates based on changes
in the labor market, economic conditions, company performance, and employee
performance and skills.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
INDUSRIAL RELATIONS
Decent workplace
1. Promote Social Justice: Industrial relations seek to ensure fairness and equity in
the workplace, protecting the rights of workers and promoting decent work
conditions for all employees.
2. Enhance Labor-Management Relations: Fostering positive and constructive
relationships between employers and workers is vital for effective communication,
cooperation, and problem-solving.
3. Ensure Workers' Rights: Industrial relations aim to protect and uphold the
fundamental rights of workers, including freedom of association, collective
bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor and child labor.
4. Minimize Industrial Conflicts: By providing mechanisms for dispute resolution
and negotiation, industrial relations work to minimize conflicts and strikes in the
workplace.
5. Promote Social Dialogue: Encouraging social dialogue between employers,
workers, and the government facilitates collaborative decision-making and policy
development, leading to more effective and inclusive labor policies.
6. Improve Working Conditions: Industrial relations strive to create safe and
healthy working environments, ensuring the well-being and welfare of employees.
7. Stimulate Economic Growth: By maintaining stable industrial relations,
businesses can operate smoothly, leading to increased productivity and economic
growth.
8. Facilitate Economic and Social Development: A conducive industrial relations
environment supports economic development and social progress by fostering
harmonious labor-management relations.
9. Ensure Compliance with Labor Laws: Industrial relations help ensure that
employers comply with labor laws and regulations, safeguarding the rights of
workers.
10. Encourage Skill Development and Training: By supporting training and
development initiatives, industrial relations contribute to a skilled and capable
workforce.
The key actors in industrial relations represent the three primary parties that interact
within the employment relationship. They each play a significant role in shaping
the work environment, and they often have different interests, perspectives, and
goals. The three main actors in industrial relations are:
Each of these actors plays a pivotal role in the dynamics of industrial relations. The
relationship among these three parties can shape the work environment, influence
the balance of power in the workplace, and impact social and economic outcomes.
Effective industrial relations require constructive dialogue, negotiation, and
cooperation among these actors, with the shared goal of promoting decent work,
social justice, and economic prosperity.
INDIAN CONTEXT
In the Indian context, industrial relations have been a significant aspect of the
country's economic and social landscape. India has a diverse and complex
industrial relations system influenced by its historical, political, and cultural
factors. The country's industrial relations framework is characterized by the
involvement of multiple actors, including employers, employees, labor unions, and
the government.
1. Labor Unions: India has a strong tradition of labor unions, which play a crucial
role in representing the interests of workers and negotiating with employers. Trade
unions in India are often organized along industry lines and have affiliations with
different political parties. These unions advocate for workers' rights, collective
bargaining, and social welfare measures.
2. Collective Bargaining: Collective bargaining is a common practice in Indian
industrial relations, where employers and labor unions negotiate terms and
conditions of employment, including wages, benefits, and working conditions.
Collective agreements, once reached, become legally binding.
Industrial Relations and Human Resources Management are two distinct, but
interrelated fields that play critical roles in managing the employment relationship
and fostering a positive and productive work environment. Both disciplines are
concerned with the management of people at work, but they each have their unique
focus and approach.
Despite their differences, both Industrial Relations and HRM intersect in many
ways:
Conflict Resolution: Both HRM and industrial relations involve mechanisms for
resolving conflicts and disputes within the workplace.
Legal Compliance: Both fields ensure that employment practices comply with
labor laws and regulations, protecting the rights and interests of workers.