Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Titanium 2
Titanium 2
Titanium 2
2.- Do you think that the company should purchase the new machine?
Suppose in both cases that all the current assets are financed by
suppliers.
TITANIUM S.A.1
The company
I. The project
1
Professors María Luisa Garayalde and María José López prepared this case as the basis
for class discussion rather than to illustrate either the effective or ineffective handling of
an administrative situation. No part of this case may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, used in a spreadsheet or transmitted in any form or by any means without the
written permission of the authors.
Expected sales and costs (mainly the raw material and the hiring of an
expert polisher) are set out below:
The time frame for the project is five years, not only because of the
difficulty of forecasting further ahead, but because it is expected that the
competition will enter the market in strength form the sixth year on and
will erode sales.
In January 2004 the machine went into operation and the budget was met
with such ease that everything seemed to suggest that the business would
continue that trend. In the summer of 2005, Titanium received a second
offer from the supplier of the machine; it was shortly bringing out a model
featuring new technology at a total price of around 720,000 dollars. The
useful life of the machine was estimated to be five years, after which the
residual value would be practically nil. If Titanium were to buy it, the
supplier was willing to buy back the first machine for 100,000 dollars at
most. The new machine would provide savings of around 35,000 dollars a
year over the previous estimates.
When he asked for the forecast for 1999 and 2000, the managing director
found it less than optimistic: