Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section C Contitution of India Section
Section C Contitution of India Section
Section C Contitution of India Section
It was held promotion of majority language did not mean stifling down of minority language.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution
established and administered by a minority, referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by
or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right
guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The state shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on
the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.
Explanation- The term minority is no where define in the constitution, but it literally means as the non-dominant
group. In the Re. of Kerala education bill the question arose the what is minority, whether it means 15% of the entire
population of India or 50% of entire population of state or there part of.
The Supreme Court held that as per the provision of A.30 the minority section will be determine on the basis of
population of the state.
Case Law: T.M.A Pai Foundation V. State of Karnataka
1. Linguistic Minority
2. Religious Minority
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas
corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warrant and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of
any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law
empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction ill or any of the powers exercisable by
the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.
The word ‘appropriate’ proceeding in clause 1 of A.32 means the proceeding which are appropriate in nature. The
appropriateness of the proceedings would depend on particular writ which the person claims.
PIL means the litigation at the instance of public-spirited person for the enforcement of their rights.
The concept of Res-judicata is applicable for write jurisdiction but only exception to it is writ of habeas corpus.
#Curative Petition
Curative petition is a petition which filed for reconsideration for finale decision or judgment passed by the supreme
court after exhausting the remedy of view petition under article 137.
Case Law: Rupa Ashok Hurra V. Ashok Hurra
#During Emergency
A.32 The right to move to supreme court under article 32 can be suspended U/A 359 which empower to suspend by
order the enforcement of fundamental rights. A.359 refer to a situation when proclamation of emergency is in
operation as per the provision of A.352.
#Writs:
Writs are a written order from the Supreme Court or High Court that commands constitutional remedies for Indian
Citizens against the violation of their fundamental rights. Article 32 in the Indian Constitution deals with
constitutional remedies that an Indian citizen can seek from the Supreme Court of India and High Court against the
violation of his/her fundamental rights. The same article gives the Supreme Court power to issue writs for the
enforcement of rights whereas the High Court has the same power under Article 226.
1. Habeas Corpus:
o Meaning: “Habeas Corpus” translates to “you shall have the body.” It is a writ that ensures an
individual’s right to personal liberty and protects against unlawful detention or imprisonment.
o Objective: To secure the release of a person who is unlawfully detained.
o Grounds for Invoking: When someone is held in custody without legal justification.
o Related Case Law: ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) – A landmark case during the Emergency
period that upheld the government’s power to suspend habeas corpus.
2. Mandamus:
o Meaning: “Mandamus” means “we command.” It is a writ issued by a higher court to a lower court
or public authority, directing them to perform a specific duty.
o Objective: To enforce a legal right or duty.
o Grounds for Invoking: When a public official fails to perform their duty.
o Related Case Law: State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh (1952) – A significant case on the scope of
mandamus.
3. Certiorari:
o Meaning: “Certiorari” means “to be certified.” It is a writ that allows a higher court to review the
decision of a lower court or tribunal.
o Objective: To quash an order or decision.
o Grounds for Invoking: When there is an error of jurisdiction or violation of natural justice.
o Related Case Law: R. v. Electricity Commissioners (1924) – A landmark English case that clarified the
scope of certiorari.
4. Prohibition:
o Meaning: “Prohibition” prohibits a subordinate court from proceeding with a particular case when it
lacks jurisdiction.
o Objective: To prevent an inferior court from exceeding its authority.
o Grounds for Invoking: When a court acts beyond its jurisdiction.
o Related Case Law: R. v. London County Council (1931) – An important case on the application of
prohibition.
5. Quo Warranto:
o Meaning: “Quo Warranto” means “by what authority.” It challenges the legality of a person holding
a public office.
o Objective: To inquire into the authority or right of an officeholder.
o Grounds for Invoking: When someone unlawfully occupies a public office.
o Related Case Law: N. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer (1952) – A significant case on quo warranto.
The fundamental duties were incorporate in constitution with an object to remind every citizen that apart from their
fundamental rights, every citizen must also be conscious about his fundamental duties. This is so because every right
has a co-relative duty.
4. Initial there was 10th duties and 11th duty added by 86th amended.
5. Fundamental duties is just like Directive Principles of State Policy are non-enforceable.
6. These duties were added primarily on the recommendations of swaran singh committee.
7. Fundamental duties is apply only citizen and doesn’t extend to foreign or non-citizen.
4. Fundamental duties is closely related to Hindu mythology like respecting the country and promoting the spirit of
brotherhood
2. Fundamental duties served as warning to anti-national and anti-social activity. Example- Burning of national flag,
destroying any public property etc.
3. Fundamental duties acts as source of inspiration for the citizen and promote sense of discipline as well as
commitment among them.
4. Fundamental duties help in raising national goals by active participation of the citizen rather than acting as mere
spectators.
5. Fundamental duties help in judiciary in examining and determining the constitution validity of any law.
6. Fundamental duties are ideal in nature and lead the citizen in right direction.
7. Fundamental duties moral obligation of all citizen to help in promotion of spirit of patriotism and uphold the unity
of india.
8. Fundamental duties makes the citizens conscious about their social responsibility and consider the inalienable
rights of fellow citizens.
1. The parliament may provide for the imposition of punishment or penalty for non-compliance of fundamental
duties.
Case Laws:
1. The Prevention of insult to national honour Act, 1991- [A. 51A (a)]
2. The protection of civil right Act, 1955 (Abolishment Untouchability)
3. Indian Penal Code [A.51A (e)]
4. The unlawful activity prevention Act, 1955 [A. 51A (h) & (j)]
5. Representation of people Act, 1951 [A. 51A (e) & (h)]
6. Wildlife protection Act, 1972 [A. 51A (g)]
7. Environment protection Act, 1986 [A. 51A (g)]
8. Forest conservation Act, 1980 [A. 51A (g)]
9. Right to education Act [A. 51A (a)]
2. One of the most important that is duty to pay taxes and duty to family planning are not covered in it.
In this case the supreme court held that proper respect was shown by the students to national anthem by standing
up in silent while national anthem was being sung. Not joining in signing in the national anthem the court held it did
not amount to disrespect to the national anthem.
The court directed everybody to stand while the national anthem is played in the theatre, however it is not
necessary to sing national anthem.
In this case the supreme court having regard to grave consequence of water and air pollution, it directs the need to
preserve or to protect national environment.
The court recognised precautionary principle which mandated that any type of serious damage to the environment
should not be caused the precautions must to court hand.
In this case the respondent published an editorial highlighting irregularity in the appointment and the transfer of
member. The court held that keeping in mind constitutional framework under article 51A (h) it become the duty of
every citizen to develop scientific temper, humanism and spirit of enquiry and reform.
The court observed that fundamental duties thou not enforceable by any writ, yet it provide a valuable guide & aid
to the interpretation of judiciary about the legal issues.
7. They are enforceable in the court of law 7. They are not enforceable in the court of law
11. Fundamental rights are amendable on a 11. Fundamental duties are absolutely
condition that is should not destroy the basic amendable without any condition
structure
12. They are politically and socially in 12. They are moral, political & socially in
characteristic character
13. They are available against individual as well 13. They are as such not available against
as state anyone because they are unenforceable in
nature
Article 28(1):
Article 29(1):
o “There shall be equality of opportunity for “Every citizen shall strive towards excellence
all citizens in matters relating to in all spheres of individual and collective
employment or appointment to any office activity so that the nation constantly rises to
under the State.” higher levels of endeavor and achievement.”
o No citizen shall be ineligible or This duty encourages continuous
discriminated against based on religion, improvement and progress at both
race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, or individual and national levels.
residence.
o The State can make provisions for
reservation in employment for backward
classes not adequately represented in
services
Article 21:
Article 21A:
Right to Education: