Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 67

OATH TAKING AND ITS PLACE IN POLITICS:

THE NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE

BY

OLANIYI VICTORIA TOLULOPE

MATRIC NO: 100106018

BEING A LONG ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGION

AND AFRICAN CULTURE, FACULTY OF ARTS, ADEKUNLE AJASIN

UNIVERSITY AKUNGBA AKOKO IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE

DEGREE IN RELIGION AND AFRICAN CULTURE.

FEBRUARY, 2015

i
CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that this project was carried out by Olaniyi Victoria Tolulope in

the Department of Religion and African Culture, Faculty of Art, Adekunle Ajasin

University, Akungba Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria under my supervision.

……………………………………. ….......................

MR. B.S. OGUNMOROTI DATE

SUPERVISOR

……………………………………. ……………………

DR. OGUNLEYE A. RICHARD DATE

H.O.D

DEDICATION

ii
This research work is dedicated to God Almighty the giver of wisdom, knowledge

and understanding, and to my adorable parents, Mr. Ipinmoroti Olaniyi and Mrs. Olaniyi

Bukola.

iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My gratitude goes to God Almighty for his divine mercy, protection, preservation,

guidance and providence throughout my academic pursuit at Adekunle Ajasin Akungba

Akoko-Akoko. I am grateful for his uncommon blessings and grace over my life during

the course of my study.

I am using this opportunity to express my gratitude to everyone who supported

me through the course of this project. I am thankful for their aspiring guidance,

invaluably constructive criticism and friendly advice during the project work. I am

sincerely grateful to them for sharing their truthful and illuminating views on a number of

issues related to this project work.

I express my warm thanks to Mr. B.S. Ogunmoroti my project supervisor, who

painstakingly guided me towards a coherent and redefined work of his nature. His

corporation, support and constructive criticism are for me, a particular source of

stimulation. I am highly grateful to him

I also acknowledge my H.O.D Dr. A.R. Ogunleye for his fatherly love in the

department. More importantly, I am indebted to my parents, my sister Miss Olaniyi

Damilola and brother Mr. Olaniyi Ayobami, Mr. Ayinde Aremu, Mr. Balogun

Olamilekan, Miss Abass Adeyinka, Mr. Olaonipekun Olusegun, Osunwekomi

Ademolakun, for their immense support during the course of my study at the university.

And many more not mentioned here, thanks for your love and care, God bless you all.

iv
ABSTRACT

The research aimed at an in depth analysis of oath taking, introducing the various types of

oaths. The research further aimed at explaining politics in Nigeria and the relevance of

oath to it, coupled with the problem of corruption and god-fatherism which follows in the

wake of negligence of oaths of the office by Public Office holders, the research therefore,

explains how Nigeria would look like if public office holders adhere to their oaths of

office. The work employed secondary source of information to get data used to establish

its points and it is perceived that it would contribute to the existing body of knowledge on

oath taking and at the same time, provoke further study.

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE………..…………………………………………………………………….i

CERTIFICATION...............................................................................................................ii

DEDICATION...................................................................................................................iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..................................................................................................iv

ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................v

TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................vi

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION..............................................................................1

1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................1

1.1 Background to the study................................................................................................1

1.2 Statement of the Problem..............................................................................................3

1.3 Aims and Objectives of the Study................................................................................4

1.5 Scope and Limitation...................................................................................................5

1.6 Definition of terms........................................................................................................6

Endnotes..............................................................................................................................7

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE......................................9

2.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................9

2.1 Literature Review..........................................................................................................9

2.2 Conclusion...................................................................................................................13

Endnotes............................................................................................................................14

CHAPTER THREE: OATH TAKING AND POLITICS............................................16

3.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................16

3.1 Oath and how it is taken..............................................................................................16

vi
3.2 The Purpose of Oath Taking........................................................................................22

3.3 Effects of Oath Taking.................................................................................................24

3.4 The Relevance of Oath Taking...................................................................................26

3.5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................27

Endnotes............................................................................................................................29

CHAPTER FOUR: POLITICS IN NIGERIA.............................................................33

4.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................33

4.1 Politics in Nigeria........................................................................................................33

4.2 Oath Taking in Nigeria Politics...................................................................................36

4.3 Effects of Corruption in Nigeria Politics.....................................................................38

4.4 Effects of the Adherence to the Oath of Office..........................................................41

4.4 Conclusion.................................................................................................................45

Endnotes............................................................................................................................47

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION................................................52

5.1 Conclusion.................................................................................................................52

5.2 Findings.......................................................................................................................53

5.3 Recommendations........................................................................................................54

5.4 Summary.....................................................................................................................56

BIBLOGRAPHY...............................................................................................................57

vii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.0 Introduction

In most modern democracies, groups and individuals vie for power through

affiliations with competent political parties. Nigeria’s fourth Republic has the largest

number of political parties ever, with a total of sixty three so far only a few of these

parties are however, viable and competent enough to successfully vie for political power

even at the local government level.

Politics, to many, is all about acquiring power and only party formations that have

potentials to deliver on such a promise to its followers can attract and retain membership,

especially in a country like Nigeria. In democracy, parties are supposed to operate mostly

independent of the government. For countries like Nigeria, where there is material

poverty, disposable income with which to fund party activities is hard to come by

amongst the citizenry. Political parties in Nigeria are usually founded by fund revised by

only a few financiers who had access to big government contracts in preceding

administrations, notable figures within the military establishment thus have a

disproportionately high representation in this cadre and the civilians are mostly

individuals who are known to have benefited immensely from military rulers in regimes

that preceded current civilian democratic dispensation.

1.1 Background to the study

Among the cultural heritage that Nigeria shared with other African communities

is covenant keeping.1 Africans being very religious, has covenant and its keeping as one

1
of their religious elements. As a background to this study, we need to examine politics as

it is experienced in Nigeria.

In recent years, especially in this present political, social and economic

dispensation, many people that were saddled with one responsibility or the other are

performing below expectations.2 The reality on ground is that the people in authority who

are to act in such a way, not only to abide by laws but also to come by the approvals of

those affected by their positional actions seem unable to enforce the highest degree of

moral and religious truth demanded by this age.3

This moral decadence has led to a series of corrupt practices, among them are:

ascending to political leadership through election rigging and genocidal political

techniques, son of soil philosophy, political of expediency, judicial fractionalization of

human beings, political self-aggrandizement, political Hitlerism as a mechanism for

retention of power, replacement of “we feeding” by “me-feeding”, uncurtailed lust of

wealth, giving and receiving of kickbacks for government contracts, police insistence on

taking bribes as precondition of performing their duties.4

Babalola argued that corruption in politics occurs at two levels. The first level has

to do with the various forms of corruption in politics at the law-making level while the

second form is the law-making implementation level. At the first level, people try to

influence law-making and policy decisions while at the second level, efforts are made by

people to pervert the course of justice and influence judgement.5

This aforementioned political corruption in Nigeria can be deduced to have been

borne out of the non-adherence to the oath of office taken by our public office holders.

Hence, this research work would look into the roles of oath-taking Nigerian politics.

2
1.2 Statement of the Problem

An oath, according to Wikipedia, also called plight is either a statement of face or

a promise with wording relating to something considered sacred as a sign of verity. 6

Certain promises said out loud in ceremonial or judicial purpose are referred to as oaths,

even when sacred objects are not given conscientious attention. This is usually regarded

as an affirmation, a good example of this, is the oath of office taken by anybody

occupying a public office.

Oath taking, which Nigeria politicians take with levity, is a serious issue that

ought to be taken with all seriousness. Due to the overbearing nature of God in the

Nigerian politics, it becomes difficult for public office holder to adhere to their oath of

office. This is because, despite them taking the oath, they neglect it in order to service

their most basic desire which mostly include the orders of their godfathers and as it is

said “two captains cannot be in the ship”. Thus, they forget their oaths and fulfill the will

of their god fathers who helped to install them.

Hence, a public office holder that neglects his oath of office cannot be a fair

leader because he would have discarded the constitution, silenced opposition and he

would tend towards been dictatorial. And he would inversely bribe his way through any

checks and balances. Thus, a public officer who forgets about his oath of office will

rather serve himself, his household and his political party, than serve the entire populace.

Foremost, among the problems facing good governance in Nigeria is corruption, which is

borne out of bad leadership and bad governance. This is inherently due to the fact that

Nigeria leader set aside the oath they took during their swearing-in and the oath taken has

3
become a formality to which people pay lip service. Thus, the difficulty of Nigeria is

rising above the state of penury.

1.3 Aims and Objectives of the Study

It is of absolute importance that public office holders’ especially Nigerian

politicians adhere to their oath of office to enable even development across the nation.

The inequality sharing of the dividends of democracy, whose basis is in the suspension of

oath of office, can hinder the rate of development, thereby making the Nigerian politics

under developed.

Hence, this research work aims at examining the various types of oath and how

they are taken. It also aims at determining how oath of office will be taken seriously by

public office holders in Nigeria. It is evident that despite the ubiquities of oath taking in

Nigeria, many people remain indomitably committed to falsehood, unfaithfulness and to

other related vices. Example abounds to the unfaithfulness at the level of the policy

making bodies to the lowest level of the decently enslaved masses. Thus oath taking,

instead of ameliorating the worsening national condition, has remained a virile tool for

perpetuating the worst altitude for the national demoralization and religious mesmerism.

It is believed that at the end of this research work, all office holders, that is,

politicians would have benefited from the study. This research work aims to showcase the

relevance of oath taking and will also focus on the effects of the adherence to the oath of

office on the democracy professed to be practiced by the nation. The study will also help

to show that oath taking cannot be separated from politics.

Finally, it is the aim of this study to point out how national unity and progress can

be attained in a diversified nation like Nigeria through adherence to the oath of office. It

4
will also examine the nature and level of corruption the nation has suffered due to

negligence of duty that leads to corruption through “belly politicking” by the politicians.

In conclusion, this research work will find out how politics has been conducted in

Nigeria in time past and at the same time, suggest methods for better politics in Nigeria.

This study is aimed at contributing to the existing body of knowledge on oath taking and

politics in Nigeria and at same time provoke further research.

1.4 Methodology

The method we will adopt during the cause of this research work will be

historical, that is it would be narrative and explanatory in that, it would discuss how

politics has been done in Nigeria in time past and at the same time draw out the origin of

oaths and its taking. However, all the necessary materials to be use will be channeled

toward the determining and understanding the effects of oath taking in politics in relation

to the Nigeria experience. During the course of this research work, the major source of

information would be secondary which are textbook, journals, newspapers, internet to

mention a few.

1.5 Scope and Limitation

Due to the vastness of Nigeria, the research work will not be given its full reins. It

would be limited to oath taking in the state and federal government only. Moreover, due

to the diversity of people and cultures in Nigeria, politics will only be examined in this

research work as related to Nigeria as a nation.

5
Furthermore, the information needed for this research will be gotten through

secondary source as lots of protocols may have to be seen before one can access the state

governor to get primary information.

Finally, during the course of this study, people and books that are hyperbolical

would be encountered. Hyperbolical in the sense that, they tend to exaggerate the effects

of a particular government, depending on how favourable or otherwise the government is

to them and not to the generality of the people.

1.6 Definition of terms

Oath is a formal promise to do something or a formal statement that something is true.7

Politics is the activities involved in getting and wing power in public life and being able

to influence decisions that affects a country or a society.8

Adherence is the fact of behaving according to a particular rule or following a particular

set of beliefs or a fixed way of doing things.9

6
Endnotes

1. Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun, Nigeria @50: The Role Of Good Governance And

Effective Public Administration Towards Achieved Economic Growth And

Stability In Fledging Democracy (International Journal of Politics and Good

Governance vol.3, No 3.3, Quarter III,2012),5.

2. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping among the Yoruba people: A Critique

of Socio-Political Transportation Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science Vol. 3 No 9, 2012), 4.

3. Chris Iwejuo Nwagboso and Otu Duke, Nigeria and the Challenge of Leadership

in the 21st century: A Critique (International Journal of Humanities and Social

Sciences Vol. 2, No. 13, 2012), 3.

4. Bababola, cited by M.A.O Aluko, The Institutionalization of Corruption and its

Impact on Political Culture and Behavior in Nigeria (Nordic Journal of African

Studies 11 (3): 393-402, 2002), 6.

5 M.A.O. Aluko, The Institutionalization of Corruption and its Impact on Political

Culture and Behavior in Nigeria (Nordic Journal of African Studies 11 (3): 393-

402, 2002). 4.

6. What is Oath, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath, Accessed

27/08/2014.

7. A.S. Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English, 6th

Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

7
8. A.S. Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English, 6th

Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

9. A.S Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English, 6 th

Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

8
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.0 Introduction

This chapter shall review the works of scholars and what they have done on oath

taking and its place in the Nigerian politics.

2.1 Literature Review

According to Wikipedia online dictionary an “Oath, also called plight is either a

statement of fact or a promise with wording relating to something considered scared as a

sign of verity”.1 This definition is quite relevant to this research work, in that it helps us

to clarify the general meaning of oath. It goes further by stating that “legal substitute for

those who conscientiously object to making a scared oath is to give an affirmation

instead.2 This is also relevant to this research work as it has explained that oath is not

only a religious affair, but it has failed to tell us how this oath can be taken, this research

work will fill this gap.

While defining oath, Oxford Advance Learners dictionary states that it is a formal

promise to do something or a formal statement that something is true 3 this definition is

also relevant to this research work because it reveals exact purpose why oaths are taken,

that is, to ensure that something is done.

Politics on the other hand, is the “activities involved in getting and using power in

public life and being able to influence decisions that affects a country or a society”. 4 This

definition is relevant to the research work in that, it tells us what politics is about, but

does not explain to us the fundamental activities involved in politics. This research work

will fill this gap. It is also “activities associated with the governance of a country or other

9
area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parities having or hoping to

achieve power”5 this definition has succeeded in telling us some of the activities involved

in politics. Most importantly, it has subtly told us that election is a part of politics.

However, the next line of action after election is omitted and this will be looked into

during the course of this work.

Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun, while writing on good governance cited Natufe, who

defined government as “collective body of elected and appointed institutions, empowered

to legislate and adjudicate for the good of the society”. 6 This is quite relevant to this

research work in that it explained to us why and how politics came to be.

On the other hand, the World Bank defines governance “as the manner in which

power is exercised in the management of a country’s economic and social resources” 7 this

definition however, explained the main duties of government but never reveal how these

duties of government can be implemented. This work will do justice to this lacuna.

The former governor of Lagos state, Bola Ahmed Tinubu described governance as

the process of decisions making and the process by which decisions are executed or not

implemented”8 This definition shows that it is quite possible for a governance to be

effective thus termed good governance or ineffective that is, bad governance. It however

failed to explain criteria to be used to adjudge governance or either good or bad.

Writing on Oath taking in Christianity, Anulefela opines that “swearing an oath is

another way of making covenant in the Old Testament” 9. He illustrated this by citing an

example, of Abraham who made his servant Eliezer to undergo oath taking, he was

commissioned to get a wife for Isaac, his son. Abraham asked him to put his hand under

his (Abraham’s) thigh and swear by the Lord, the God of heaven and earth that he would

10
not take a wife for Isaac from the daughters of the Canaanites among whom they

dwelt”.10 This above example is quite relevant to this research work as it establishes the

existence of Oath taking in Judeo-Christianity or in the Ancient Near East.

Ogunleye writing on covenant, from Yoruba view assets that:

“By the doctrine of the African traditional religion, man is


expected to be in a covenant relationship with his fellow
man and object of worship. The implication of this is that
any harm done to one member affects other members. Thus,
it becomes necessary for the members of a cultic or
religious group to seek for the well-being of one another
and avoid any action that amounts to the breaking of
covenant. With this in mind, the Yoruba people often
handled the phenomenon of covenant with utmost care in
order to move the society forward”.11

This has explained to us that to ensure peace and tranquility in the society,

covenants made are expected to be kept. He however did not highlight what will happen

if such covenants are not kept. This research work will shed more light on this.

While writing on the purpose of Oath taking, Steven J. Cole is of the opinion that

“the purpose of an Oath was to guarantee truthfulness by ones calling on God as

witness.”12 Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia gives six (6) types of oaths and they are as

follows:

“Hippocratic Oath is an Oath historically taken by


physicians and other health care professionals swearing to
practice medicine honestly,

11
Oath of allegiance is an Oath whereby a subject or citizen
acknowledges a duty of allegiance and swear loyalty to
monarch or country.
Oath of citizenship is an Oath taken by immigrants that
officially naturalize them into citizens.
Oath of Office is affirmation a person takes before
undertaking the duties of an office.
Pauper’s Oath, is a sworn statement or oath by a person
that he or she is completely without money or property.
Veterinarian’s Oath is an Oath taken by veterinarians as
practitioners of veterinary medicine in a manner of
Hippocratic Oath”.13
This is also quite relevant to this research work as it helps to know the various

types of oath that are in existence. It however fails to speak about divine oath, which is

one of the onus of this research work.

Godwin Ijediogan and Samson Ezea, while writing on the relationship between

Oath taking and politics in Nigeria, they expressed that:

“Official Oath taking is not strange to Nigeria. For before an


elected office holder assumes power, he/she is expected to take an
oath of Allegiance and or oath of office. For the president “I do
solemnly swear/affirm that I will be faithful and bear true
allegiance to the Federal Republic of Nigeria and that I will
preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria.” The president governors and some other
elected office holders also take an oath of office “ to discharge my
duties to the best of my ability, faithfully and in accordance with
the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the law and
always in the interest of the sovereignty, integrity, well being and
prosperity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria…….that I will not

12
allow my personal interest to influence my official conduct or my
official decisions”. 14

This has been able to explain that, a cordial relationship exists between oath

taking and politics in Nigeria. And in the same vein it tells us what the Nigeria oaths of

office entails.

O.O. Familusi, while writing on politics in Nigeria, is of the opinion that

“political god-fatherism has been institutionalized in Nigeria. Thus, the activities of god

fathers in politics cannot be ignored and as such have contributed and continued to

impact negatively on governance and democratization”. 15 This point out the god-

fatherism is one of the issues facing politics and democracy in Nigeria, but it has failed to

tell us what the political environment of Nigeria looks like. Hence, this research work

will fill this gap.

2.2 Conclusion

This chapter reviewed some works of various scholars on various definitions of

oath, politics and also the nature of politics in Nigeria but as failed to tell us what the

political environment of Nigeria looks like. It was also reviewed in this chapter the types

of oath we have in different spheres of profession including the religious aspect of oath

taking. Regardless of the noteworthy contributions by the various authors, they have been

able to wholly add that oath is not just a religious affair but it has failed to tell us how this

oath can be taken, this research work will fill this gap.

13
Endnotes

1. Oath, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath Accessed, 3/09/2014

2. Oath, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath Accessed, 3/09/2014

3. A.S Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, 6 th

Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

4. What is politics? Retrieved at

http://www.google.com/searchClient=msrim&w=en&Q=what%is

%politics3f&ie=wf-8&oe=utf-channelbrowser. Accessed 3/09/2014

5. What is politics? Retrieved at

http://www.google.com/searchClient=msrim&w=en&Q=what%is

%politics3f&ie=wf-8&oe=utf-channelbrowser. Accessed 3/09/2014

6. Igho, Natufe, cited by Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun, Nigeria @50: The Role of

Good Governance and Effective Public Administration towards Achieving

Economic Growth and Stability in Hedging Democracy (International Journal of

Politics and Good Governance, Volume 3, N0 33 Quarter III, 2012),10.

7. World Bank, citied by Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun, Nigeria @50: The Role of

Good Governance and Effective Public Administration towards Achieving

Economic Growth and Stability in Hedging Democracy (International Journal of

Politics and Good Governance, Volume 3, N0 33 Quarter III, 2012), 9.

8. Bola Ahmed Tinubu, citied Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun, Nigeria @50: The Role of

Good Governance and Effective Public Administration towards Achieving

14
Economic Growth and Stability in Hedging Democracy (International Journal of

Politics and Good Governance, Volume 3, N0 33 Quarter III ,2012),7.

9. J.O. Anulefela, Covenants in the Old Testament and in Yoruba land (Ibadan;

Daystar Press, 1988), 9.

10. J.O Anulefela, Covenants in the Old Testament and in Yoruba land (Ibadan;

Daystar Press, 1988), 11.

11. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping among the Yoruba People: A Critique of

Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities and

Social Science Volume 3, No 9, 2012), 6.

12. Stephen Cole J, the Christian Oath. Retrieved at

http://freemasonry.bay.ca/texts/oaths-taking . Accessed, 17/10/2014

13. Types of Oath, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath Accessed,

17/10/2014

14. Godwin Ijediogor and Samson Ezea, Nigerian Politics and Oath taking Retrieved at

http://www.nigerianbestforum.com/index.php?topic=36767 Accessed 17/10/2014

15. O.O Familusi, Towards a Religious Alternative to political and God-fatherism in

Nigeria Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of Religious Studies,

University of Ibadan, 2012), 436.

15
CHAPTER THREE: OATH TAKING AND POLITICS

3.0 Introduction

It is a proverbial fact that oath-taking constitutes an integral part in politics. The

shoddy nature of Nigeria politics has necessitated the incorporation of oath taking into it.

Therefore this chapter will as a matter of necessity and compulsion examine the

relevance of oath-taking to politics. Also, this chapter will unarguably explicate the

relationship that subsists between oath-taking and politics.

3.1 Oath and how it is taken

As a matter of fact, oath which according to Oxford Advanced Learners

dictionary, is a solemn promise to do something or a solemn declaration that something is

true,1 is undoubtedly and integral part of every society. The reason being that people take

oath in order to profess their unwavering loyalty and unalloyed commitment to the

betterment of their people, after they have been placed or elected into a position of

authority. Oath taking in Nigeria politics is borne out of the fact that corruption is

pandemic in man and will probably remain in him for sometime to come. 2 As a result of

this people in exalted position or political offices are placed under compulsion to swear

an oath before they assume offices.3

It is not out of place to establish that oath-taking has curtailed some exercise in

the society. For example some political leaders act not only in conformity with the

Nigerian constitution but also in accordance with the wish of the people as a result of the

oath they have taken. In other words, people that take oath act in consonance with the

solemn declaration they made before they assumed offices owing to the fact that they

16
realize the consequences that are inherent in not fulfilling their promises. From time

immemorial, oath taking has played vital and significant roles in the society, in the sense

that, people feel enmeshed after they have taken oath and because of this, subscribe

themselves to each and every word used in the oath they have taken.

It is not erroneous to explain that oath taking is synonymous with covenant

making, which is to establish a relationship of truthfulness. 4 Lockyer’s realized this when

he postulated that:

“Generally speaking, Covenants were originated by God for man’s


good, to condition life on earth. From this side, covenants cannot
be broken, man may break covenant and break them as he often
does, but God’s word or promise, or covenant cannot fail. My
covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is said out of my
lips (psalm 89:34)”.5

From Lockyer’s point of view, it can be inferred that covenant making goes far beyond

words of mouth or reaching an agreement. It creates a relationship between man and the

transcendental power. In the same view, oath taking performs similar function, if not the

same with covenant making. Therefore, oath taking occupies a pride of place in the

society right from the traditional period to the modern age as a result of the consequential

roles it plays in the society.

Oath taking rears its head in many religious and secular institutions, for various

human disciplines and in the private life or several individuals. It is one of the world’s

oldest practice that have stood the test of many epochs and generations; it has outlived

the reigns of many rulers, the hegemony of many civilizations and the attacks of many

17
critics.6 Oath taking can generally be defined as religious moral and psychological

enforcement of an act over an agreed situation, or a conformation of the truth by naming

something held sacred, a statement or promise conformed by an appeal to a sacred higher

being to enforce the attached sanction.7

The practice of a divine oath is usually an invocation of a divine agency to be a

guarantor of the oath taken. The oath taker own absolute honesty and integrity to the oath

taken because life is impossible without trust and that the growth of the society is

founded on unspoken natural trust.8 Thus, to swear falsely is a humiliation to God and to

one’s own country, it is seen as a contempt for the integrity and intelligence of the

people.9 Oath taking is essentially religious it binds two or more people together in

mutual confidence that there would not be a betrayal of the confidence they repose in one

another. In taking an oath, there is often the appeal to a high power that is believed to be

unbiased towards or against any party involved in the oath taking, while at the same time

the higher power serves as a witness and as a potential sanctioned to punish whosoever

fails to carry out the statement promised on oath. The higher power could be God, a local

deity, a deceased ancestors or even a moral body.10

A person taking this kind of oath, that is the divine oath; indicates this in a

number of ways. The most usual is the explicit concluding part that calls on something

“as my witness” and “so help me” with something or someone which the oath taker holds

scared.11 Many people take an oath by holding in their hands or placing over their head, a

book of scripture or a scared object, thus indicating the scared witness through their

action. Such an oath is referred to as coporate.12 this is because making an oath or

covenant taking binds people together, thus a member does not live his life alone. He is a

18
member of the corporate body. Life and prosperity belong to all and are shared together,

when a member is in sorrow others share the joy with him. Material things are owned and

shared together punishment too are shared together corporately in form of feeling pain or

sympathy.13

Christianity and Islam also adopt the practice of Oath taking, their advocates

swear on their holy write and on the names of their deities or God, in some of their

ceremonies. Oath taking is ritualized and demand as a prerequisite for either ordination or

for the acceptance of a religion or religious office. Apart from the appeal to God, people

present at the Oath taking ceremony are called upon to witness the ritual.14

In Christianity, the concept of oath is deeply rooted in it, it is fond in Genesis

8:21, when God swears that He will “never again curse the ground because of man and

never smite every living thing.15 Eliezer the servant of Abraham also made an oath to

Abraham by placing his hand on Abraham’s thigh to make a solemn promise that he

would not choose a wife for Isaac among daughter of Canaan. 16 In Christianity, the

scriptural of departure is the third commandment, which is translated in the King James

Version as “Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the lord will

not hold him guiltiness that taketh his name in vain”. Many Christians incorrectly assume

that this verse merely teaches that we should not curse using the name of God. Indeed,

the third commandment does teach that we should not curse using the name of God.17

Islam on the other hand, takes fulfillment of oath extremely serious that one of the

sayings of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) commonly referred to as Hadith, instincts

Muslims to “make oaths only in Allah Almighty, the Master of all beings and protect

19
them more than your lives18. Sahih Buk hai 45:15 which implies that when a Muslim

wants to make an oath. It is impermissible to swear by anyone other than Allah,

regardless of whether it is a father, grandfather, Sheikh, saint, religious leader, highly

virtuous person or a prophet. As some people take an oath by Ali or by fire pure

personalities, it is all prohibited.19

The Yoruba traditional religion would be used to represent African traditional

religion. In Yoruba traditional religion, views oath as a form of covenant. A covenant

which is made in form of an oath that is taken in front of divinity or religious emblem

makes Yoruba people to comport themselves well in the society. A newly enthroned king

who swears to deliver justice without fear or favor is duly bond to keep it. Anything

contrary to the oath leads to disaster. There are different kinds of oaths among the

Yoruba, some of them are covenant between friends, and this can be in form of an

ordinary spoken agreement between two friends. This type of covenant is often sealed

with sharing of kolanut and speak ill of each other. This is because; kolanut is an

important fruit in the Yoruba spiritual life. It is believed to be capable of warding off

death, diseases and even pestilence. If two or more friends share a piece of kolanut, the

act becomes a covenant, thus anybody who betrays the terms of covenant is surely

attracting evil on his/her head.

Another one is the marriage covenant. Once a woman is married to a man, she

becomes one with him. Both the husband and wife will enter into a covenant, which is

usually regarded as blood covenant.20 this type of covenant, according to Anulefela, is

often made in secret without the knowledge of their extended families. To go about this,

the man would incise his body (usually left arm) and she would do the same then would

20
rub kolanut in each other blood and then eat it, thus sealing the covenant with their

blood.21

Kings among the Yoruba people do no rule their kingdoms alone. They did so

together with the council of chiefs and however, the king can enter into a covenant with

his chiefs by leading them to the shrine of Ogun, the god of Iron, there, the chief priest

will mark them with camwood powder and chalk. After this, the entire chiefs will enter

into covenant of absolute loyalty with the king.22

The religious aspect of covenant was introduced into the Nigerian system of

government in the form of oath of office which public officers have to swear in order to

make them serve the public conscientiously. The oath of office, which can be

administered by either a court or its delegate, involves pledging loyalty to perform

faithfully the duties associated with the office. During this exercise, each person is

allowed to swear an oath of office with the religious paraphernalia or cultic symbol for

the religion one belongs .23

In contemporary day, oath taking has taken another dimension as the witness can

decide the form he wish to administer the oath, it could be through raising up of hand or

other form which he or she believes agrees with the faith professed 24. In Nigeria, oath

taking is a common feature of the law. The government offices, the marriage registries,

the religious institutions, students take oath at matriculation ceremonies, thousands of

people swear to affidavits in law courts in declaration of age and before they witness to

cases in courts.

21
3.2 The Purpose of Oath Taking

It is needless to say that, for something to be considered an integral part of a

system or society, such thing must without equivocation serve some essential purposes.

Thus, oath taking which has been defined as a “statement of fact or a promise with

wording, relating to something considered sacred as a sign of verity”. 25 Oath taking has

several purposes why it is being established in the society. Firstly, it has spiritual purpose

why it is being established in the society. The spiritual significance of oath taking has

enabled some elected officers to perform exceptionally out of realization of the danger in

failing to deliver to the masses what they promised before they were enthroned or

assumed office.

The reasons for taking an oath are based on the historical significance of religion,

when swearing an oath before God was a serious thing. The serious nature of an oath is a

criminal offence and results in substantial penalties, including imprisonment. However,

in today’s multicultural society, the law recognizes a person’s right to belief other than

Christianity or Islam, and there are various oaths for people with other religious belief.26

Additionally, oath taking inculcates patriotism into the leaders, they make

anxious efforts to defend and combat any challenges that ensue during the courses of

their administration. Oath taking serves as a source of encouragement to their takers. This

is because some leaders, for instance, public office holders when they want to perform

their duties, the oath they have taken will still boost their self-esteem and by the

adherents of these oaths, there will be peaceful democratic governance in our nation.

22
Oath taking is a force to reckon with in the life of an individual, and puts up act

that are adjudged to be morally justified. However, one of the purposes of oath taking

helps the people to act within the confine of moral laws that are put in place in the

society. The emphasis on the significance of the responsibilities of the office being

assumed and re-enforce the accountability of the oath takers.

Oath taking also injects sanity into politics, constraining them to fulfill the

promises they made before they assumed office. This is because oath taken by the leader

will make them strive to act in a way to act and perform in line with expectations of the

masses and try as much as possible to eradicate any act that could culminate into violence

and political upheaval.

Finally, oath taking serves the purpose of grinding the people in the corridor of

power or in position of authority on the principles they are expected to uphold in

performing their duties. It awakens people to their duties and helps them to be more

conscious and disposed to their constitutional duties.

In conclusion, sequel to the above, it is quite understandable that oath taking

serves different purposes which are too numerous to mention. The purpose of oath taking

is to enhance the commitment of people to their duties, which promotes social

reconciliation, peace building and brotherhood. It also includes authentic humanism,

positive dialogue, equitable and just in sharing of resources, abundant provision of the

amenities of life. Thus, oath taking is an integral part of the society.27

23
3.3 Effects of Oath Taking

It is noteworthy that oath taking has consequential effects on the oath takers and

the society at large, in both positive and negative ways. The effects oath taking has on the

takers when there is utter adherence are quite erroneous and pleasant while the reverse is

always the case in a situation whereby the oath taken is handled with levity. In other

words, the impact of oath taking is largely felt by the people of the society and this

impact, be it positive or negative is often determined by the manner which the oath taker

goes about the oath he or she has taken.

Oath taking comes in diverse manners. In the traditional setting, before a man

could be put at the helms of affairs, such a person must swear to an oath by pledging his

commitment and showing his readiness to serve in accordance with the expectation of the

people. The oath is often administered by traditional leaders and witnessed by the people,

taking the Oath-taker through their presence that confidence is being reposed in him and

that failure to fulfill his promises will be catastrophic.

Therefore the effect this kind of oath has on the society is that there would be a

cordial relationship between the leader and the people. This often ushers in seasons of

abundance comfort and growth in all ramifications. In a case where the oath taker

renegade on his promise, what will be the order of the day is a strained and it also attracts

wrath of the gods by whom the oath is taken.28

The form of this oath taking in governance in modern day perspective can be

considered to be legally implicating because of the fear attached to it. 29 Some individuals

swear to affidavit to change the dates of their births several times in life time in order to

24
gain certain official secular advantages. Man can only be physically be born once, yet

indirectly, Nigerian courts have through affidavit made people have more than ten or

more rebirths without death. Such mysterious people continue to hold important positions

in Government establishments. How would such people lead others to truthfulness? 30

Politically, keeping to an oath brings about an even development, landmark

achievement and several developmental programs to mention but few because all these

must have been promised in the course of taking the oath. In a situation whereby

credence is not given to the oath taken by the political office holder ,the effect as always

been untold hardships on unbridled corruption, chaotic environment, open hostility and

dwindling economy which are very inimical to the growth of any society.

In the court of law, before a person can be a witness to a case, such person must

take an oath with promise that all he/she would say will be the absolute truth, this is

because, the witness’ position is one of the detriments of the judgment. The effect this

has on the society is that if the witness is truthful to the oath taken, there would be error

free judgments, but if he or she is not too truthful to the oath as a result of financial

benefits, the dispensation of judgments would be meddled up, thus making the Judgments

unfair. If the witness is caught to be telling a lie he or she would be charged with the

contempt of court and might be sent to jail or freed with stern warning.31

Finally, it is safe to conclude that the effects of oath taking largely depend on the

manner which the oath is being administered, the spiritual element that are involved and

ways the oath taker go about the oath they have taken.

25
3.4 The Relevance of Oath Taking

Scott Hultsman said” with great opportunity comes great responsibility. To save

selflessly, to create and share and to improve the world in which we live we need to take

oath”.32 Thus, oath is quite relevant in the society now because it helps to build reliable

relationship. This is because the person taking the oath enters into a cordial relationship

with the person administering the oath and the person for whom the oath is taken.

Oath taking is quite relevant in that, it helps in ensuring the commitment of the

oath taker to a particular duty. As Gabriel Anthony Sosa puts it “I would like to execute

well at making decision that considers every input and output with a mind for continuous

improvement for as many people as possible”. 33 This shows that when a public office

holder adheres and his fully committed to the oath of office there will be a mutual trust

which will give us a national thrust towards a better nationhood. There is a need to

restore a measure of mutual trust and inculcate in the hearts of all Nigerians a new

practical value of moral regeneration.

Again the relevance of oath taking is seen in the way it helps to refocus our moral

compass on accountability. This is so because anybody that takes an oath will strive to be

morally upright, so that when he is leaving office that is politically, he can be

accountable. And a person who can account for his expenditure, who makes decision that

is favorable to the majority of the people, is deemed responsible.

In conclusion, the integrity of an oath taker is assured especially when such a

person keeps to the oath he or she has taken, making the people to have faith in his words

and helping them to keep their hopes alive. Nigeria is in dire need of a reliable political

26
system. Public offices and security duty posts are often treated as individuals’ privilege

positions where officers dispense duties as favour to individuals. This is what is often

responsible for public contract awards, ten percent malpractices and bribery in its entire

ramification. The need for a well disciplined civil service cannot be over emphasized. 34

3.5 Conclusion

Oath which is the solemn promise to do something or a solemn declaration that

something is true is an integral part of every society. To ensure that corruption does not

override political leaders in Nigeria, they should be encouraged to strictly adhere to their

oath of office. We cannot have a peaceful nation as long as mutual mistrust reigns

supreme in the hearts of all Nigerians. The ascent of power and political control should

not be based on unproven wealth and diplomatic manipulation of votes and the gun.

Oath taking as it has been explained in this chapter is synonymous to covenant

making which has to establish a relationship of truthfulness. The concept of oath taking

cuts across the three major religions practiced in Nigeria that is Christianity, Islam and

Africa traditional religion represented in this research work as Yoruba traditional

religion.

In modern times affirmation can be used in place of oath, and it includes oath of

office and the witness of oath of office are usually taken so that public office holder can

be conscientious in discharging their duties. One of the purposes of oath is to instill

patriotism into these public office holders. The effect of oath taking cannot be

overemphasized as it ensures the commitment of public office holder to their duties and

at the same time, make them accountable for their decision and actions.

27
Conclusively the chapter has discussed what oath taking is all about, its purpose,

the effect it has and the relevance of oath taking in contemporary society. Thus, it has

been enumerated in this chapter that to ensure public office holders have commitment

and the spirit of patriotism the have to take a constitutional oath through their religious

object and which should be strictly adhered to for the even development of the country at

large.

28
Endnotes

1. A.S. Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, 6 th

edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

2. J.O. Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament and in the Yoruba Land (Ibadan

Day Star Press, 1988), 1.

3. J.O. Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament and in the Yoruba Land (Ibadan

Day Star Press, 1998), 2.

4. J.O. Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament And in the Yoruba Land (Ibadan

Day Star Press, 1988), 1.

5. Lockyer, cited in J.O. Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament and in the

Yoruba Land (Ibadan Day Star Press, 1998), 1.

6. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 123.

7. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 123.

8. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping Among the Yoruba People: A Critique

of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science volume 3, No 9, 2012), 3.

9. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping among the Yoruba People: A Critique

of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science volume 3, No 9, 2012), 3.

29
10. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 123.

11. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping Among the Yoruba People: A Critique

of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science vol 3, No 9, 2012), 2.

12. Oaths Taking, Retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath. Accessed,

29/08/14

13. Oaths in Christianity Retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath. accessed

29/08/2014

14. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 125.

15 Oaths in Christianity, Retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath. Accessed,

29/08/2014

16. Oaths in Christianity, Retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath. Accessed,

29/08/2014

17. Oaths in Christianity, Retrieved at

www.reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/index.html!?mainframe=/webfiles/

antithesis/v1n_1/ant_v1n1_oaths.html Accessed, 29/08/2014

18. Oaths in Islam, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath Accessed

29/08/2014

30
19. Oaths in Islam, retrieved at

www.answering-islam,org/Muhammad/inconsistent/oath_making.html accessed

23/11/2014

20. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping among the Yoruba People: A Critique

of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science volume 3, No 9, 2012), 3.

21. J. O. Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament and in the Yoruba Land (Ibadan

Day Star Press, 1988), 24.

22. J.O Anulefela, Covenant in the Old Testament and in the Yoruba Land (Ibadan

Day Star Press, 1988), 25.

23. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant Keeping among the Yoruba People: A Critique

Of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science vol 3, No 9, 2012), 5.

24. Oladosu Olusegun, Yoruba Traditional Oath Taking: A Panacea for Good

Governance Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of

Religious Studies, University of Ibadan, 2012), 465.

25. A.S. Hornsby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, 6th

Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

26. Purpose of oath taking, retrieved at www.justice.qld.gov.au/_ips accessed, 27/

11/2014

31
27. Chris Iwejuo Nwagboso, Nigeria and the Challenges of Leaders in the 21st

Century (International Journal of Humanities and Social sciences Vol.2, No.13,

2012)

28. Effects of Oaths, retrieved at http://www.mbaoath.org/forum. Accessed 6/9/2014

29. Oladosu Olusegun, Yoruba Traditional Oath Taking: A Panacea for Good

Governance, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of

Religious Studies, University of Ibadan, 2012), 463.

30. T.M. Ilesanmi Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 124.

31. C. Stuart Gilman, Ethics codes and codes of conduct for promoting an ethical and

professional public service: comparative successes and lessons. Retrieved at

http://www.oecd.org/mena.../35521418.pdf Accessed, 06/09/2014

32. Effects of Oaths, retrieved at http://www.mbaoath.org/forum. Accessed 6/9/2014

33. Effects of Oaths, retrieved at http://www.mbaoath.org/forum. Accessed 6/9/2014

34. T.M. Ilesanmi Oath-Taking as the Psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious StudiesXXXVI/1-2, 2004), 124.

32
CHAPTER FOUR: POLITICS IN NIGERIA

4.0 Introduction

This chapter will examine how politics in practiced in Nigeria and at the same

time, illustrate where and how oath taking in relevant to politics in Nigeria. Thus it

becomes imperative that this chapter discuss the effects which the adherence to the oaths

of office will have on Nigeria, her people and her future politics.

4.1 Politics in Nigeria

Politics, according to Wikipedia online dictionary, is the activities associated with

the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among

individual or parties having or hoping to achieve power 1. It has also been defined as the

practice and theory of influencing other people on a global, civic or individual level.

Moreover, it refers to achieving and exercising positions of governance that is, organized

control over a human community, particularly a state. 2 Finally, it is the study or practice

of the distribution of power and resources within a given community (a hierarchically

organized population) as well as the inter-relationships between communites.3

Based on these aforementioned definitions of politics, it can be deduced that it is

due to the nature of man to fulfill his needs, potential and aspiration, propel him to

33
always want to dominate or protect himself against domination by others. Therefore,

domination over others gives you the widest capacity to determine your own fate or

destiny. Thus, the substance of power struggling, recognition and authoritative allocation

of values and limited resources within the society is the beginning of politics and political

activities in the history of man.

In Nigeria, to be political is to be religious, this is because religion and politics are

so intertwined in Nigeria that Adeniyi is of the opinion that “religion and politics had

played and continue to play vital roles in the socio-cultural and geographical

development of Nigeria as a nation state. 4 The religion one professes, determines the

level of one’s popularity in an area. Politics is obviously not only party politics and the

politicians are not the only people who participate in politics. Party politics is an essential

feature of politics but it is not its only subject matter. 5 In every human organization from

the smallest to the largest, there is a need for decisions to be made by a few on behalf of

the many. This decision-making is what we usually refer to as politics. Politics, therefore

does not corner politicians alone-it concerns everybody in the society; “it affects all, it

should therefore concern all”.6

However in Nigerian politics, the public office holders may be said to be

participating in political life when their activity relates in some way to the making and

execution of policy for the society. But this has been the other way round, where the

political leaders make decisions for their own selfish interests and forgetting the promise

they made to the mass when taking the oath of office. Political life was developed by

human beings to avoid the State of nature. The State of nature is what the seventeenth

century English writer, Thomas Hobbes, described as the “war of all against all, where

34
life would be poor, solitary nasty, brutal and short”. 7 This means that everybody will be

making his decisions and an individual by nature is selfish, hence his decisions would be

aimed at maximizing his personal pleasures at the expense of others. This was the reason

for a political life in every organized society.

Nigeria on the contrary, instead of the fair political life, political god-fatherism

has been institutionalized, the activities of godfathers in politics cannot be ignored and as

such have continued to impact negatively on governance and democratization. While

writing on god-fatherism, Familusi observed that;

“God-fatherism used to be predominantly a Christian religious term, which

presupposes placing a young Christian under the tutelage of an older and a more

proven one, for spiritual guidance and mentoring. In recent times, it has assumed

a political coloration as attention is now seriously focused on political godfathers

whose antics manifest in the willingness to dictate tune to their godsons, self-

centeredness and manipulation of the electoral process to favour their cronies”.8

God-fatherism is a symbiotic relationship between two persons namely; the

godfather and the godson, whereby the godfather uses his political power and wealth to

secure political position for the godson, who upon ascension into power, pays

gratification to his mentor in kind or cash.9 The activities of political godfathers in recent

time cannot be overlooked, as such have continued to determine, to a great extent, where

the pendulum of the electoral process and governance swings.10

In the first republic, god-fatherism produced the notable figures in the likes of

Azikwe, Awolowo.11 God-fatherism has become a norm in Nigeria’s political

35
environment, where without a godfather, and an individual cannot secure a political

position. This, in the fourth republic, has assumed a lubricious dimension in Nigeria

policy. The political actors and their estranged political father were in the verge of

contending who is who in their state. Prominent among the warlords in the states are

Senator Modu Ali Sheriff vs Governor Mala Kachalla of Borno; Dr Olusola Saraki vs

Governor Muhammad Lawal (Kwara State) Senator Jim Nwobodo vs Governor

Chinwoke Mbadinuju (Anambara state); and Alhaji Abubakar Rimi vs Governor Rabiu

Kwankwaso of Kano State.12

God-fatherism in Nigeria politics has led to the corruption of the nation, which

has become so excessive that it has seriously disrupted the normal functions of the state.

The Nigerian State has become a weak edifice eroded by corruption; that Jibrin Ibrahim

is of the opinion that “high-level of corruption transforms the character of the State. The

Nigerian State has been transformed into patrimonial and rentier, one in which those who

are in control of state power and strategic bureaucratic offices use their positions for

private appropriation”.13 Thus, it is quite clear that godfather is a major component of

politics in Nigeria. Hence, Osca Ameringer’s definition is applicable in Nigeria, He

defined politics as “the gentle act of getting rote from the poor and campaign funds from

the rich by the promise to protect them from one another”14.

4.2 Oath Taking in Nigeria Politics

Oath taking which has been entrenched into politics the world over, is an aspect

of religion which is a potent force in achieving political stability in the land, considering

36
the role it can play in bringing bout development in the light of the corruption that

pervades the Nigerian society15.

In the present dispensation terrain in Nigeria, the political leaders are either

elected or appointed into government and the medium of election are via the voting

system. The executives, who emerge the majority vote, assume control of the

administration of the government of the territory for three to four years. 16 As can be

deduced from the foregoing, that elections has not been free and fair in Nigeria and this

suggests that each of the stakeholders has been found wanting in the discharge of his

responsiblities.17 After these leaders have been selected into office, through electoral

malpractices many of them renegade on the promises they have made to the people

The religious concept of covenant was introduced into the Nigeria system of

government in the form of oath of office which public officers have to swear in order to

make them serve the public conscientiously. 18 During this exercise, each person is

allowed to swear with the religious paraphernalia or cultic symbol of the religion one

belongs to. In the Nigeria context for example, adherent of traditional religion are

allowed to swear to Ogun (god of Iron) represented by a piece of metal while Christians

and Muslims could swear with the Bible and the Quran respectively. 19 The purpose of

using these religious objects is that, they are sacred objects; they were believed to have

the potential to instill fear in the people who swear by them. The act of obedience in this

regard reveal the allegiance to the faith that a person is involved in, since it is taken that

the object used in the act of oath are sacred.20

37
Unfortunately, rarely can one see a leader that wants to take the oath of office in

the indigenous way. Nevertheless, it has become an habitual reflection that most of the

implication attached to these sacred objects are taken or granted, this is why other non-

traditionalist (Muslims and Christians) taking oath of office by their sacred books could

contravene the command of their worship since they believe that no penalty is forth

coming or probably the nemesis may take long to occur or in most cases the acts of

seeking forgiveness may rather change the penalty already passed. 21 Hence, the oath

taken as a form of ensuring security and assuming conformity as it is practiced in Nigeria,

has never been effective. Hence, the Oath taken as a form of ensuring security and

assuming conformity as it is presently practiced in Nigeria, has never been effective.

One can therefore subsume that keeping to an Oath is a religious obligation that

demands truthfulness which is a moral value upon which all forms of social, ethical and

political relation are built,22 which our political leaders seems to lack in Nigeria. Today,

in Nigeria, many people that were saddled with one responsibility or the other are

performing below expectation. 23 It is a reality that the people in authority, who are to act

in such a way not only to abide by laws, but also to come by the approvals of those

affected by their positional actions, seem unable to enforce the highest degree of moral

truth demanded by this age and time. This, unarguably, has caused a lot of set backs to

the social development, political stability, cultural development and family integration.

Hence, the fostering of greater mass participation in decision making, policy formation,

execution and monitoring of public affairs and developing the confidence of the people in

themselves, in their societies and in their government. This in turn, would lead to the

38
development of a greater sense of commitment to development and a readiness to make

sacrifice for it24 that is the promises made to the people when they acquired the office.

4.3 Effects of Corruption in Nigeria Politics

Corruption is one of the most notorious enemies of man. It has unfortunately

eaten deep into the fabrics of the Nigerian society. Politicians and public office holders

are taking advantage of their opportunistic positions to cheat on others. Several conscious

efforts have been put in place to stem the tide of this pandemic but to no avail. 25 It is

certain that a good and healthy political environment in Nigeria will lead to a growth in

the social economic and all round development of the Nigerian nation. This development

can be attained through adherence to oaths of office sworn by public office holders.

When the public office holders do not adhere to their oath of office, there will be public

corruption, which is one of the main reasons for the development of poverty and under

development in the country. It has become a stumbling block to the people’s enjoyment

of the economic and social fruits of democracy.

Oath taking has become a religious cancer eating deep into the entire fabric of our

government lives. Thousands of Nigerians take oath of office and yet purposely and with

impunity, ruin the economy of the nation through financial embezzlement. Through such

acts, our nation development is retarded and delayed for centuries. 26 Nigeria has gradually

become a nation where individuals mistrust themselves and others. This mutual mistrust

is responsible for our attitude towards oath taking. People who are truthful need no oath;

they lead harmonious and highly humanizing lives. People who claim “divine”

responsibility for the moral formation of others now find themselves entangled in

39
litigation and counter litigations in secular courts. If people say “yes” when they mean

yes, oath taking which comes from the evil one would not now have been their

psychology for mutual mistrust. Oath taking has not affected the desire truthfulness in

Nigeria; on the contrary, it has given room for the perpetuation of many vices27.

Not only government functionaries alone are responsible for corruption in their

societies, government as institutions of power are themselves involved in corruption

when the engage in patron-clients relationship in which they state as the patron allocates

existing and newly created rights to private agents in exchange for a share of the rent

accruing from the private agents’ use of these assests.28 Since politics and Economics are

inter wined, Nigerian politics had become transformed into a system in which politicians

and their protégés found it difficult to resist the temptation to use the public purse to

feature private nests.29

However, Nigeria situation was so bad that Larry Diamond remarked thus about

Shagari’s regime:

“The character of political leadership was also a problem. It would have been

difficult even for the strongest and most heroic leaders to contain violence and

corruption generated by the high structural premium on state power. But

President Shagari never put that proposition to a test. A weak leader prone to

governing by consensus, he was unable to control the renal tendencies of his

party machinery and closet advisers. The meeting of his cabinet and party council

became grand bazaars where the resources of the state were put up for

auction”.30

40
His (Shagari) regime was overthrown by the military, due to the grave economic

predicament which the corrupt leadership has imposed on the nation’s economy. Nigeria

from time of democracy, her economy has been mismanaged, there is an inadequacy of

food at reasonable prices, and we have become a debtor and a beggar nation. Our

education system is deteriorating at an alarming rate; unemployment figures including the

graduates have reached embarrassing and unacceptable proportions.

In Nigeria, like all developed nations of Africa, 90% of our citizens are interested

in meeting their biological and social needs-food, shelter, education, health, urban and

rural roads, electricity and water supply. 31 These are things that make life meaningful to

the people and over which they spend all their income. These however are the budgets of

all the States and Local Government, these are the goods and services which every

successive government since independence always promised to provide. 32 But

unfortunately these promises are still left unfulfilled due to their deliberate blindness to

the oath of office they sworn before they assumed office. The citizens are then left alone

to meet a substantial part of their biological and social needs which needs which are

taken as given in any civilized society from their private income which again is not

sufficient to meet these compulsory obligations.33

This, however, has led to an uncloseable gap between economic and social wage

in Nigeria. Of course, the wider the gap, the poorer the people become. Thus, corruption

in public management cleans up the plate leaving the citizenry empty-handed or with

only the crumbs and leftovers.34

41
4.4 Effects of the Adherence to the Oath of Office

Oath taking is a religious phenomenon which has produced for Nigeria secular

government needs not get itself mixed up with it. 35 Good constitution which does not

discriminate against any citizen or ethnic group can help to regulate the Nigerian legal

system and liberate it from all forms of mutual deception.

There is need for a functional legal system whose interpretation would be beyond

the comprehension of the average citizen. When, for example, the Nigerian constitution

was drawn up by Nigerians from different walks of life, ‘legal luminaries ought not to

have subsequently masqueraded the simple message in their own legal jargons and thus

create for themselves the monopoly of the interpretation of our common heritage. The

law should be brought to the reach of the average citizen. 36 Thus, the effects of the

adherence to the oaths of office will lead to the following:

The leadership position would be assumed with the aim of serving the general

interest of the people and not ones interest or one’s minority group, that is, family,

religion, tribe and town. This in essence, means would be an end or a noticeable

reduction in tribalism, favoritism and nepotism. This would enhance even development in

the nation. Social amenities, health facilities, good education, job opportunities, would be

the other of the day.37

Economically, adherence to the oath of office would create a chaos –free

environment that will encourage foreign investors to consider Nigeria as a fertile land to

invest in. Thus, the image of the nation will receive a positive boost from the

international eyes and jobs will be created for qualified Nigerians, thereby, improving the

42
standard of living of the people and helping the nation to rise out of abject poverty.

Moreover, everybody will put the welfare of one another in mind. This definitely will

remove greed, anger and pre-conceived ideas from the minds of individuals, giving room

to free and fair judiciary.

Again, loyalty to the purposes, values and principles for these public office

holders were elected will be achieved. This is because they will at all times discharge

their duties and regulates their conducts with the interest of Nigeria and her people.

Besides, the State will be able to give appropriate sanction to every offending citizen

without ethnic, religious, or personality discrimination. And this in return will produce a

state or national impetus for truthfulness, faithfulness and true nationalism. 38 The public

office holders will be impartial in the performance of their official duties. They will

always act with objectivity and professionalism. They will ensure that expression of

personal view and convictions does not compromise the performance of their official

duties or the interests of the Nigerian nation. They will not act in a way that unjustifiably

could lead to actual or perceived preferential treatment for or against particular

individuals or groups.39

Furthermore, they will maintain standards of integrity, that is, honesty,

truthfulness, fairness and incorruptibility in all matters affecting their official duties and

Nigeria as a whole. The public office holders will become accountable for their decision

and actions when they adhere to the oath of office they took. They will submit themselves

to the scrutiny and healthy criticisms of the opposing parties, knowing fully well that they

have nothing to hide. If Nigeria as a whole, should be sincere in whatever we do, there

will be a chance to creating confidence in ourselves, establish a level-playing field for

43
everybody to practice what he or she is best suited to do. In this way we will be able to

launch the required offensive against that great cankerworm “corruption”, which has

eaten so deep into the fabric of the society, private sector organizations inclusive which

sometimes induce corruption in the public sector in order to fulfill their private profit

agenda.40

As a public office holder, one has to be loyal not only to the people he is

representing but also the Chief Executives that is the governor or the president either

directly or indirectly through the boss in each and every unit of authority exercised on

behalf of the Chief Executive. The Yoruba puts the matter beautifully “ ti a ba ran ni nise

eru, a fi je to mo”, which literally means that if you are sent on an unpleasant mission,

you have to accomplish the mission in a pleasant way so as to cushion the effects of the

unpleasantness. This in essence, is the key to the success of any organization particularly

a government business outfit. One should be loyal to the system and not to an individual,

once the trust is being betrayed, your loyalty to the mass will no more be valid or else

you will run foul of the law and you will be committing an illegality. That is why your

oath of office enjoins you to discard personal interest where it conflicted with public

interest.41

Let us presume that the individual Nigerian citizen is truthful and reliable until he

proves himself otherwise in the new era of moral regeneration that puts an end to the

psychology of mutual mistrust. Nigerians who abuse the position of trust should not only

be punished for their offences, they should also be black-listed from holding public

offices. Those who drained the national purse caused death and are still instrumental,

44
although indirectly to the deaths of many Nigerians today. If they do not suffer capital

punishment, they should not enjoy nation’s pardon.42

Finally, if the public office holders adhere to their oath of office, there would be

respect for human life, thus protect the human rights. This is because the incessant

killings that pervade elections in Nigeria, making politics a do or die affair will be

eradicated, because the public office holders will relinquish decision power to the

electorate who will decide who to rule them. Thus, making elections in Nigeria free and

fair, and the Nigeria politics a clean game and not a dirty game. Hence, it fits to subsume

that adherence to the oaths of office would not only enhance rapid development in

Nigeria, it would also be the panacea needed to put an end to the epidemic outbreak of

corruption in the nation.

4.4 Conclusion

Politics, which is the activities associated with the government of a country or

other areas, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or

hoping to achieve power, has been practiced in Nigeria as a do or die affair. It is

discussed in this chapter that the platform politics in Nigeria would become a live affair,

when there is absolute adherence to the oaths of office taken by public office holders

before assuming their official duties.

When public office holders adhere to their oaths of office, corruption, whose basis

is “belly-politicking”, will become a thing of the past as rapid development will be the

signature of the public office holders, tribalism, nepotism, and favoritism will be

eradicated. There would be fairness in justice, peace and serenity will be the order of the

45
day as the wish of the people who are the electorate would be respected thus, to ensuring

a free and fair election in Nigeria. This will invariably improve the opinions of the entire

world about the Nigeria nation.

Conclusively, this chapter of this research work has attempted to discuss what

politics is and how it has been practiced in Nigeria in time past. It also discussed the role

of oath taking in Nigeria politics. However, the effects of oath taking on the development

of Nigeria that the adherence to the oath of office by public office holders has also been

enumerated in this chapter. Some of them are the demise of tribalism, nepotism and

favoritism. There would be free and fair election which eradicates the mentality that

politics is a do or die affair. Hence, in Nigeria where public office holders adhere to the

oaths of office they have taken will be a peaceful and stable environment where

economic, social and religious activities can go on without fear or rancor.

46
Endnotes

1. Politics retrieved at http://www.google.com/url?q=what is politics. Accessed,

12th of September, 2014

2. Politics, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/politics Accessed, 12th of

September, 2014.

3. Politics ,retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/politics... Accessed, 12th of

September, 2014.

4. Yoruba Religious Belief, retrieved at http://www.yorubadiary.com Accessed, 12th

of September, 2014.

5. A. Ujo Abudlhamid, Understanding Democracy and Politics (Kaduna: Joyce

Graphic Printers & publishers, 2004), 57.

6. A. UJo Abudlhamid, Understanding Democracy and Politics (Kaduna: Joyce

Graphic Printers & publishers, 2004), 58.

7. A. Ujo Abudlhamid, Understanding Democracy and Politics (Kaduna: Joyce

Graphic Printers & publishers, 2004), 60.

8. O.O. Familusi, Towards A Religious Alternative To political God fatherism in

Nigeria,, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of Religious

studies, University of Ibadan. 2012), 438.

9. Godfatherism, retrieved at http://www.nairaland.com/1091521godfatherism-

nigeria-politics. Accessed, 13th September, 2014.

47
10. O.O. Familusi, Towards A Religious Alternative To Political God fatherism in

Nigeria, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of Religious

studies, University of Ibadan, 2012), 439.

11. Godfatherism, retrieved at http://www.nairaland.com/1091521godfatherism-

nigeria-politics. Accessed, 13th September, 2014.

12. Samuel Uwhejevwe-Togbolo, politics and political god-fatherism retrieved at

http://www.gamji.com/article4000/news446. Accessed 14th September, 2014

13. Jibril Ibrahim, Manifestation and Impact of Corruption on the Nigeria Society and

Sustainable Democracy: Fighting Corruption and Organized Crime in Nigeria:

Challenges for the New Millennium (Ibadan: Spectrum books Limited, 2000), 83.

14. M.T. Akinlade , M. O. Ibitoye, Introduction to Political Science (Ibadan: Bolanle

Barakat Limited, 2008), 9.

15. A. Richard, Ogunleye, Covenant-Keeping among the Yoruba people: A Critique

of Socio-political Transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science. Volume 3, No9, 2012), 3.

16. M.A. Aluko, The Institutionalization of Corruption and Its Impact On Political

Culture And Behavior In Nigeria (Nordic Journal of African Studies II<3>:393-

4029, 2002), 6.

17. O.O. Familusi, Electoral Process and Moral Responsibility in Nigeria: A

Religious View Point (Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies, XLIII/I,

Samprints and Graphics co, 2011), 109.

48
18. A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant-Keeping among the Yoruba people: A Critique

of Socio-political transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science. Volume 3, No9, 2012), 5.

19 A. Richard, Ogunleye, Covenant-Keeping among the Yoruba people: A Critique

of Socio-political transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science. Volume 3, No9, 2012), 4.

20. Oladosu Olusegun, Yoruba Traditional Oath taking: A Panacea for Good

Governance, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of

Religious Studies, University of Ibadan, 2012), 459.

21. Oladosu Olusegun, Yoruba Traditional Oath taking: A Panacea for Good

Governance, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of

Religious Studies, University of Ibadan, 2012), 464.

22 A. Richard Ogunleye, Covenant-Keeping among the Yoruba people: A Critique

of Socio-political transformation in Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities

and Social Science. Volume3, No9, 2012), 5.

23. J.O. Arulefela, Covenant in the Old testament and in Yoruba, (Ibadan: Daystar

Press, 1988), 61.

24. Olaiya Oni, Public management in contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 36.

25. DR. Noibi M. A. Political Corruption and the Nigerian democratic Environment:

The Role of Religion (Ondo: Department of Religion and African Culture,

Adekunle Ajasin University Akungba Akoko, 2011), 11.

49
26. Ilesanmi T. M, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004),131.

27. Ilesanmi T. M, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004), 131.

28. Segun Odunuga, The Impact of Corruption and Organized Crime on Nigeria’s

Economy and Economic Development: Fighting Corruption and Organized Crime

in Nigeria: Challenges for the New Millennium (Ibadan: Spectrum books Limited,

2000), 58.

29. Segun Odunuga, The Impact of Corruption and Organized Crime on Nigeria’s

Economy and Economic Development: Fighting Corruption and Organized Crime

in Nigeria: Challenges for the New Millennium (Ibadan: Spectrum books Limited,

2000), 61.

30. Larry Diamond cited by Segun Odunuga The Impact of Corruption and

Organized Crime on Nigeria’s Economy and Economic Development: Fighting

Corruption and Organized Crime in Nigeria : Challenges for the New Millennium

(Ibadan Spectrum books Limited, 2000), 62.

31. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 43.

32. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 31.

33. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 64.

50
34. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 62.

35. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004), 131.

36. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004), 132.

37. Putting Ethics to Work: A guide for the UN Staff retrieved at

http://www.un.org/en/ethics 15th September 2014.

38. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004), 132.

39. Putting ethics to work: A guide for the UN Staff retrieved at

http://www.un.org/en/ethics 15th September 2014.

40. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 116.

41. Olaiya Oni, Public Management in Contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press,

2010), 121.

42. T.M. Ilesanmi, Oath Taking as the psychology of Mutual Mistrust in Nigeria

(Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies XXXVI/1-2, 2004), 132.

51
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

5.1 Conclusion

This research work does not seek to condemn any form of government, it

illustrates oath taking and the role it plays in Nigerian politics, while at the same time

discuss what politics in Nigeria is all about. The literature reviewed in the course of this

work, has highlighted the cause of corruption in Nigeria. It furthermore explained what

oath taking is all about and the various types of oath. It was also made known in this

research work that before corruption and slow rate of development can be eradicated in

Nigeria, there is the need for public office holders to adhere to the oaths of office they

took, which is that, they discharge their duties without fear and rancor.

A thorough analysis of oath reveals that it is a solemn declaration to do

something, whose purpose is to ensure truthfulness, accountability and fairness in a

nation as vast as Nigeria. It will however bring about even development, landmark

achievement and several developmental programs to mention but a few. Economically,

adherence to oath of office would create a chaos-free environment that will encourage

foreign investors to consider Nigeria as a fertile land to invest in. The political

environment of Nigeria was also discussed in this research work. The role of oath taking

in politics is to ignite the conscience of public office holders as it is a pledge of loyalty to

perform faithfully, the duties associated with their office. Everybody will put the welfare

of one another in mind, which will remove greed, anger and preconceived ideas from the

minds of individuals, giving room to free and fair judiciary.

52
5.2 Findings

Having critically examined the oath taking and its place in politics with reference

to the Nigerian government, in relation to the public officers who secures his or her

position through a mandate freely given by the people of a geographical area- Local,

State or Federal to represent their interest within a period. It was also observed within the

context of submission that an oath of office is a solemn promise that is legally binding,

administered by an officer of law, an approved officer of the profession, club or group,

the Head of States, governors and any approved and appointed officer of repute.

However, it has been observed that usually during political campaigns, the

prospective gives a list of the things that he or she will handle if given mandate. After

securing such a mandate and after assuming the political position, they renegade on their

promises. Unfortunately, these promises are left unfulfilled due to their deliberate

blindness to the oath of office they sworn before they assumed office. Nigerians

especially public office holders have made the oath of office a frivolous undertaking as

most of them commit crimes and barefaced corruption against the State without qualms

of conscience. This is outright perjury, but the law lacks the bite to persecute them. They

take oath of office in the name of God, witnesses in courts lie profusely haven taken or

sworn to an oath with the Bible or Quran. it has been observed that Nigerians do not fear

God Almighty or that they are taking His compassionate nature for granted.

Finally, it has been observed that oath is a political, social, religious and economic

humdinger. The man or woman who takes an oath of office or upon whom an oath of

53
office is administered or devoted is statutorily obligated to carry out his functions or

duties to the spirit of the letter of the oath of office.

5.3 Recommendations

Since it is given, that three major religions are practiced in Nigeria that is the

Christianity, Islam and African Traditional Religion- our indigenous religion. And it is

generally believed that Christians and Muslims God gives room for forgiveness by

deferring judgment to a latter day called judgment day. In the light of this, what is the

way forward to re-entrenching probity in our leadership and national life? I beg to

suggest that public office holders, who are likely to be Bible or Quran compliant, through

investigation, should be made to swear or take oath of office by Ogun, or Olokun and

other local deities. This is because it is a known fact that African gods deliver

instantaneous judgments on people who do not keep their parts of oath taken. This in

essence is not to deny public office holders their rights to life, it is to make them wake up

to the call of duty and at the same time reduce the influx of belly politicians into politics

in Nigeria, thus, making the Nigerian nation a corruption-free polity. Experience has

shown that a vest majority of Nigerians are only sunken in splendiferous of religious

doctrines. They only pray for money by any means and once they find themselves up

there in public office, they see it as a God/Allah sent opportunity.

It is clear in essence to say that traditional oath taking plays a vital role in the

governance of this country if allowed by political leaders. It is a means through which

54
cultural values can be improved upon and serve as a podium through which religio-

cultural ethics can be instilled to caution our leaders in their acts of governance.

The adoption of traditional oath taking for public officers serves as an urgent need

to correct societal and moral decadences in Nigeria’s public services. It explores the

importance of African culture and also draws the attention to aspects of the country’s

culture that in turn provide answers to factors militating against Nigeria’s economic

development and growth. Our culture promotes values such as honesty, diligence and

hard work, however, it is lamentable that this values which are part of our indigenous

lifestyles are now replaced with the culture of impunity and laziness. We attach little or

no importance to our promises irrespective of our beliefs. We do this to our peril and at a

great cost to the progress of our people and country.

The solution to the impact of corruption and other vices affecting the country’s

socio-economic and political life lies in the promotion of the positive aspects of the

country’s culture. When we draw useful lessons from our cultural practices, that is our

indigenous religion; we can be sure that our situation would change for the better. Today,

many people no longer respect and keep commitments and allegiance, not only in

leadership positions, but also in all aspects of life. The choice of objects of modern faiths

for oath taking by most people is driven by their delayed retribution compared with those

taken with objects of traditional religion whose consequences are believed to be

immediately.

55
5.4 Summary

Oath taking which is an integral part of religions in the world is an inevitable

aspect of politics. There are various types of oath taking but the one that is the bane of

discussion in this research work is the Oath of office which must be sworn by public

office holders before assuming duties. It is unfortunate that politics in Nigeria is clothed

in a garment of do or die. It has, has it basis of god-fatherism which is the kind of

relationship in which the political sponsor becomes the elected by proxy, thus dictating

the tune of the music.

This research work has shown that to have a corruption free political environment

in Nigeria, public office holder’s have to adhere to the oath of office they have taken and

this inevitably will lead to a free and fair election, fair judicially, even development, on

unhindered economic activities has the society will be peaceful. Thus, encouraging

economic activities and it would increase the standard of living of Nigerians.

Hence, this research work recommends that; to ensure adherence to the oath of

office, public office holders are to be compelled to swear their oath by invoking an

African god, preferably “Ogun” the god of iron among the Yoruba which is acclaimed to

be a no nonsense god who delivers instantaneous judgment. The fear of death is a

common phenomenon among the principal stakeholder of the society, taking oath

traditionally will also help them to keep their promises during their tenure of office. It

will also serve as a medium of checks and balances, and a standard that will help the

society and the community to grow rapidly. Thus, the observed result can then be

discussed in future research works.

56
BIBLOGRAPHY
Abudlhamid Ujo A, Understanding Democracy and Politics (Kaduna: Joyce RS &

publishers, 2004).

Akinlade M.T, Ibitoye M O, Introduction to Political Science (Ibadan: Bolanle Barakat

Limited, 2008).

Anulefela J. O, Covenants in the Old Testament and in Yoruba land (Ibadan: Daystar

Press, 1988).

Dr. Noibi M. A, Political Corruption and the Nigerian democratic Environment: The

Role of Religion (Ondo: Department of Religion and African Culture, Adekunle

Ajasin University Akungba Akoko, 2011).

Familusi O.O, Religion and Governance in Nigeria (Ibadan: Department of Religious

studies, University of Ibadan, 2012).

Olaiya Oni, Public management in contemporary Nigeria (Akure: Flocel Press, 2010).

Segun Odunuga Fighting Corruption and Organized Crime in Nigeria:

Challenges for the new Millennium (Ibadan Spectrum books Limited, 2000).

57
JOURNALS

Ahmed Babatunde Adeosun; Nigeria @50: “The role of good governance and effective

Public administration towards achieved Economic growth and stability in

fledging Democracy (International Journal of Politics and Good Governance

vol.3, No 3.3, Quarter III, 2012).

Aluko M.A.O, The Institutionalization of Corruption and its Impact on Political culture

and Behavior in Nigeria (Nordic Journal of African Studies 11 (3): 393-402,

2002).

Chris Iwejuo Nwagboso, Otu Duke, Nigeria and the challenge of Leadership in the 21 st

century (International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 2, No.

13, 2012).

Familusi O. O, Electoral Process and Moral Responsibility In Nigeria: A Religious View

Point (Orita Ibadan Journal Of Religious Studies, XLIII/I, Samprints and

Graphics co, 2011).

Ogunleye, A. Richard; Covenant keeping among the Yoruba people: A critique of socio-

political Transportation Nigeria (International Journal of Humanities and Social

Science Volume 3 No 9, 2012).

DICTIONARIES

Hornsby A.S, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, 6th Edition

(New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

58
ONLINE SOURCES

C. Stuart Gilman, Ethics codes and codes of conduct for promoting an ethical and

professional public service: comparative successes and lessons. Retrieved at

http://www.oecd.org/mena.../35521418.pdf Accessed, 06/09/2014

Effects of Oaths, retrieved at http://www.mbaoath.org/forum. Accessed 6/9/2014

Godwin Ijediogor and Samson Ezea, Nigerian Politics and Oath taking. Retrieved at

http://www.nigerianbestforum.com/index.php?topic=36767 Accessed 17/10/2014

Godfatherism, retrieved at http://www.nairaland.com/1091521godfatherism-nigeria-

politics. Accessed, 13th September, 2014.

Oaths in Christianity Retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath. accessed

29/08/2014

Oaths in Christianity, Retrieved at www.reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/index.html!?

mainframe=/webfiles/antithesis/v1n_1/ant_v1n1_oaths.html Accessed, 29/08/2014

Oaths in Islam, retrieved at

www.answering-islam,org/Muhammad/inconsistent/oath_making.html

Purpose of oath taking, retrieved at www.justice.qld.gov.au/_ips accessed, 27/ 11/2014

Politics, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/politics Accessed, 12th of September,

2014.

Putting Ethics To Work: A guide for the UN Staff retrieved at

http://www.un.org/en/ethics 15th September 2014

59
Stephen Cole J, the Christian Oath. Retrieved at http://freemasonry.bay.ca/texts/oaths-

taking Accessed 17/10/2014.

Samuel Uwhejevwe-Togbolo, politics and political god-fatherism retrieved at

http://www.gamji.com/article4000/news446. Accessed 14th September, 2014

What is Oath, retrieved at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/oath,Accessed 27/08/2014.

What is politics? Retrieved at

http://www.google.com/searchClient=msrim&w=en&Q=what%is%politics3f&ie=wf-

8&oe=utf-channelbrowser. Accessed 3/09/2014

Yoruba Religious Belief, retrieved at http://www.yorubadiary.com Accessed, 12th of

September, 2014

60

You might also like