In rating you and your group members, use the one to five-point scale, where 5= superior, 4= above average,

3= average, 2= below
average, and 1= really weak. Add the scores to obtain a total score for yourself and the other group members. Put any comments you
like on the bottom and the space provided.

Title Making

Group No. You Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6

Sofia Marvelaine Paolo Yza delos Harvey Rasheed Eva Marie

Magno Santos Ilahi Mateo Cruz
Lansangan Dumaguin

On time for all 3 4 3 3 3 3 2

group meetings

Helped keep the 3 4 4 2 3 3 2

group cohesive

Number of 3 4 3 2 2 3 2
contributed ideas

Quantity of work 3 4 3 3 2 2 2
done

Quality of work 3 4 3 3 2 2 2
done.

Total Score 15 20 16 13 12 13 10

Comment

Title Defense

Group No. You Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6

Sofia Marvelaine Paolo Yza delos Harvey Rasheed Eva Marie

Magno Santos Ilahi Mateo Cruz
Lansangan Dumaguin

On time for all 4 4 3 4 4 4 3

group meetings

Helped keep the 4 4 3 3 3 3 2

group cohesive

Number of 3 4 3 3 2 2 2
contributed ideas

Quantity of work 3 4 3 2 2 3 2
done

Quality of work 3 4 3 3 2 3 2
done.

Total Score 17 20 15 15 13 15 11
Comment
Data Gathering

Group No. You Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6

Sofia Marvelaine Paolo Yza delos Harvey Rasheed Eva Marie

Magno Santos Ilahi Mateo Cruz
Lansangan Dumaguin

On time for all 4 4 4 3 2 4 2

group meetings

Helped keep the 4 4 4 3 3 4 1

group cohesive

Number of 4 4 4 3 2 3 1
contributed ideas

Quantity of work 3 4 4 3 2 3 1
done

Quality of work 4 4 4 3 2 3 1
done.

Total Score 19 20 24 15 11 17 6

Comment
 Final Paper

Group No. You Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6

Sofia Marvelaine Paolo Yza delos Harvey Rasheed Eva Marie

Magno Santos Ilahi Mateo Cruz
Lansangan Dumaguin

On time for all 3 4 4 4 3 3 2

group meetings

Helped keep the 4 4 4 4 3 3 2

group cohesive

Number of 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
contributed ideas

Quantity of work 3 4 4 3 3 3 2
done

Quality of work 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
done.

Total Score 17 20 20 17 15 15 12

Comment
Data Interpretation

Group No. You Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6

Sofia Marvelaine Paolo Yza delos Harvey Rasheed Eva Marie

Magno Santos Ilahi Mateo Cruz
Lansangan Dumaguin

On time for all 3 4 4 3 3 3 3

group meetings

Helped keep the 3 4 4 3 4 3 3

group cohesive

Number of 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
contributed ideas

Quantity of work 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
done

Quality of work 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
done.

Total Score 15 20 20 15 19 15 15

Comment