Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Claims Against Industry Partners and Other Players: Litigation Session Forum Session 3
Claims Against Industry Partners and Other Players: Litigation Session Forum Session 3
Claims Against Industry Partners and Other Players: Litigation Session Forum Session 3
Tim P. Law Partner Reed Smith, LLP 2500 One Liberty Place 1650 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 241-1210 jellison@reedsmith.com
Sunny S. Huo Member Severson & Werson One Embarcadero Center Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 398-3344 ssh@severson.com
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
Mortgage Insurance Title Insurance Buyback Disputes Discussion
Clause typically used by insurance companies to shorten the statue of limitations for breach of contract claims
Such provisions should be treated very seriously, even though there are numerous defenses to such provisions MIs often rely on such provisions to deny coverage Policyholders should look to negotiate suit limitation periods, if possible, with special emphasis on when the clock begins to run
Choice-of-Law Provisions
Some mortgage insurance policies specify which states laws apply to any dispute concerning the interpretation of the policy The law that applies to a mortgage insurance policy can significantly affect a dispute over policy construction and
application
Standards for rescission can be very different across states Policyholders should take the applicable law into
Arbitration Provisions
Certain Policies set forth the circumstances and procedures under which claims may be arbitrated Some flexible provisions allow a policyholder at its option to elect arbitration In Republic Mortgage Ins. Co., et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al., No. 603915 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed Dec. 31, 2009), the court granted policyholders motion to compel arbitration and dismissed complaint, finding arbitration clause did not require policyholder to demand arbitration before litigation was brought by MI Some provisions require arbitration but permit declaratory judgment actions on matters of policy interpretation Disputes may arise over which rules apply and how the arbitration should proceed:
Disputes may also arise over choice of law and location of the hearing of the arbitration
11
Borrower made 12 scheduled payments; or Purported fraud was not committed by a first party (i.e., insured, agent of insured, or loan originator)
Some Policies may exclude coverage for any claim involving or arising out of any dishonest, fraudulent, criminal or knowingly wrongful act by the insured
12
13
14
Require policyholders to obtain advance written approval from MIs before making any change in terms of loan
Hot issue with MIs given downturn in economy and push by government to restructure certain types of loans MIs may attempt to terminate coverage, especially if policy expressly provides such a remedy Even under Policies that do not require advance written approval, policyholders should obtain MIs approval in writing before making any modifications
15
16
(ALTA) form
Violations of RESPA, unfair trade practices and unjust enrichment based on alleged overcharging for title insurance premiums
Significant amount of premiums should have been allocated to title searches and evaluations clearing title issues
20
BUYBACK CLAIMS
Primarily breach of contract claims Breach of Contract Breach of (Express) Warranty Specific Performance Possible fraud based claims Misrepresentation (negligence) Misrepresentation (intentional)
Intent Reasonable reliance
21
TRIGGERS
EPD (30, 60, 90, 2x w/in 180, etc.) Misrepresentation/omission of material fact (employment, income, etc.) Occupancy Absence of claims Broker malfeasance (license, relationship, fees, non-compliance, etc.) TIL/disclosure inaccuracies Underwriting / lending criteria Undisclosed liens Title policy exclusions Appraisals Document delivery Repurchase *
22
Repurchase Litigation
Steps
File Analysis Records Demand Letter
Include remedies sought (buyback, indemnification, attorneys fees, etc.)
Complaint
Federal / State
Early ADR?
Split the pool Approach
Summary Judgment
Trial *
23
Repurchase Litigation
Issues
Venue Ambiguity Bad faith Stale claim Mitigation Multi-party chains Calculation of damage Foreclosures / REOs Loans or pool
Switchouts
Holdbacks
24
Repurchase Litigation
Cases
Resolution Trust (Home Owners Savings Bank) v. Key Financial (1st Cir. 2002) 280 F.3d 12 10 year litigation $8.5 million judgment No attorneys fees In re American Home Mortgage, U.S. Bankruptcy Court (Delaware) Case No. 07-11047 and related BK Code 555 and 559 safe harbors for repurchase agreements Schwab v. Residential Accredit Loans, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-10-501610
25
CONCLUSION
Given state of economy and its affect on MIs and TIs now
more than ever, MIs and TIs are looking to policy provisions and exclusions to deny coverage and companies are seeking to shift losses through buyback claims
Policyholders should review their Policies in order to understand and possibly resolve potential areas of dispute with their MIs or TIs Before engaging in a buyback dispute, companies should properly analyze the situation to make sure they
understand the true costs and risks involved a similar analysis should also be done before engagin in an aggressive defense of a buyback claim
26
SCENARIO 1
27
SCENARIO 2
28
SCENARIO 3
29
SCENARIO 4
30
SCENARIO 5
31
SCENARIO 6
32
Thank you
33