Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wardrobe Final
Wardrobe Final
Team Members:
Michael Drozd, Franco Ruscitti,
Abby Haines, Jack Mckelligon,
& Kyle Gragnola
Problem Statement
Members of CU's
Greek community
CU Students who want
to BUY clothes
About
Grace, an enthusiastic freshman at CU Boulder, is just beginning her journey into Greek life, eager to make her mark
within her new sorority. With a fresh perspective on college life and a vibrant social calendar, she's already looking
forward to her collegiate future. Instead of opting for a new dress, Grace is creatively exploring sustainable fashion
choices, showing her commitment to both style and environmental responsibility early in her college career. Her
proactive approach to embracing sorority life while staying true to her values highlights her adaptability and
forward-thinking mindset as she navigates her first year at CU Boulder.
- Interview Demographics
- Freshman/Incoming Students.
- Current Undergraduates
- Graduate Students
- Goal
- Our goal was to capture a comprehensive view of the CU student demographic, ensuring
our insights reflect the full spectrum of student experiences and expectations.
- Importance
- These diverse perspectives help us accurately define our target personas, tailoring our
project to meet the varied needs of CU students effectively.
R&D - Usability Research Questions
Navigation & Flow: Content Creation:
● Can users find what they need quickly? ● Is it simple to create and share new
● Is the layout intuitive and easy to follow? content?
● Are the posting steps straightforward
Clarity & Learnability: and intuitive?
● Are icons and buttons easy to understand?
● Can users complete basic tasks without getting lost? Profile Management:
● Can users personalize their profiles
Design & Aesthetics: with ease?
● How does the app's visual style resonate with users? ● Is there anything else to add to the
● Are there any design elements that cause confusion? profile?
Sign-Up & Onboarding: Overall Satisfaction:
● Is the sign-up process smooth and efficient? ● Would users recommend this app to
● Does onboarding effectively guide new users? others?
● Would they use the app regularly for
Messaging: their needs?
● Can users easily send, receive, and manage messages?
● Is the messaging interface clear and user-friendly?
R&D - Overall Interview Findings
Overview: Our interviews provided valuable insights into the app's strengths and areas for
improvement, helping us better understand user interaction and satisfaction.
Key Positives:
- App Flow
- Effective Navigation Aids
- Streamlined Account Management
Areas for Improvement:
- Conflicting Profile Interaction: Users found posting on profiles confusing due to interface design.
- Prototype Clarity: Low-fidelity prototypes led to misunderstandings of app features.
- Feature Overlap: Confusion arose from overlapping functionalities.
- Visual Differentiation: A lack of distinct visual cues made navigating different app sections challenging.
- Purpose Clarity: Ambiguity regarding the app’s main focus led to mismatched user expectations.
- Iconography: Inconsistent icon styles contributed to uncertainty in their functions.
Conclusion: These insights highlight the critical balance between user-friendly design and
functional clarity, guiding our next steps in refining the app's interface and functionalities.
Research and Discovery- Competitive
● Homepage Analysis
Analysis
● Cart Functionality
● Clothing Recommendations
● Branding
● Profiles/Selling & Buying Processes
Research and Discovery - Competitive
Analysis
Design Process and Iterations
Questions?
Appendix Slides