5110122, 119PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning a Springer Link Search Q © Login Published: 26 March 2021 Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning Multimedia Tools and Applications 80, 22301-22319 (2021) 288 Accesses | 11 Citations | Metrics Abstract Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is a self-organized network, contains sensor nodes deployed in particular regions to gather the environmental parameters and communicate the information to the base station directly through intermediate nodes. In recent times, WSN has gained attention from wireless device manufacturers, researchers, and users for remotely accessing and monitoring the information in diverse environments. The scalability and routing are the major concerns of the network. Apart from that, the performance of WSN depends on network simulation parameters such as delay, throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and control overhead. The research paper focused on the DSDV and OLSR routing protocol realization on the new hitpsstink springer comvartce/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 ane511022,148PM Perfomance ana f DSDV and OLR witless sensor newark aun pools using FPGA harcore and machine ering, hardware platform. The hardware chip of these protocols is designed in Xilinx ISE 14.7 software using VHDL, targeted on Virtex-5 FPGA. The node communication is verified on Modelsim 10.0 simulation software. The FPGA hardware and timing parameters are analyzed for different node clusters (N= 10, 20 ...150) configuration. The OLSR routing protocol network performance parameters are used to build the machine learning prediction model using cluster tree regression, random forest regression, multiple regre sion, and K-means clustering. The K- means clustering predicted 99.12% and 98.50% accuracy in terms of the packet delivery ratio and throughput respectively. This is a preview of subscription content, access via ‘your institution. Access options Buy article PDF 34,95 € Price includes VAT (India) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Instant access to the full article PDF. Rent this article via DeepDyve. hitpsstink soringor.comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 ane5110722, 112PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning Learn more about Institutional subscriptions Abbreviations AODV: Adhoc on-Demand Distance Vector BS: Base Station. CPU: Central Processing Unit. DSR: Dynamic State Routing. DSDV: Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector. DYMO: Dynamic MANET On-Demand Routing. FPGA: Field Programmable Gate Array. GCLK: Global Clock. ISE: Integrated Synthesis Environment. ToB: Input/output Block. HRP: Hybrid Routing Protocol. LUT: Look Up Table. MANET: Mobile Adhoc Network. MEMS: Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems. MPR: hitpsstink springer comvartce/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 ane5110122, 119PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning Multipoint Relay. ML: Machine Learning. MPSoC: Multiprocessor System on Chip. NS: Network Simulator. OLSR: Optimized Link State Routing. PDR: Packet Delivery Ratio. QoS: Quality of Service. RH: Routing Overhead. RTL: Register Transfer Level. SN: Sensor Nodes. TC: Transmission Control. TCP: Transmission Control Protocol. VHDL: Very High-Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language. WLAN: Wireless Local Area Network. WSN: Wireless Sensor Network. VANET: Vehicular Adhoc Network. bps: bits per second. hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 ana5110122, 119PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning nanoseconds. References 1, Abba S, Lee JA (2016) FPGA-based design of an intelligent on-chip sensor network monitoring and control using dynamically reconfigurable autonomous sensor agents. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(2):4246596. hitps:/ /doi.org/10.1155/2016/4246596 2, Angurala M, Bala M, Bamber SS (2020) Performance analysis of modified AODV routing protocol with lifetime extension of wireless sensor networks. [EEE Access 8:10606—10613. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2965329 3. Chavan AA, Kurule DS, Dere PU (2016) Performance analysis of AODV and DSDV routing protocol in MANET and modifications in AODV against black hole attack. Proced Comput Sci 79:835-844. hitps://doi.org/10.1016/),procs.2016.03.108 4. De La Piedra A, Braeken A, Touhafi A (2012) Sensor systems based on FPGAs and their applications: a survey. Sensors 12(9):12235— 12264, https://doi.org/10.3390/s120912235 hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 sine511022,148PM _Perlomance ana f DSDV and OLR witless sensor newark aun pool using FPGA harcore and machine ering, 5, Hamerly G, Drake J (2015) Accelerating Lloyd’s algorithm for k-means clustering, In Partitional clustering algorithms (pp. 41-78). Springer Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 09259-1 2 6, Joshi P, Singh G, Raghuvanshi AS (2020) Comparative study of different routing protocols for IEEE 802.15. 4-enabled Mobile sink wireless sensor network. In Advances in VLSI, Communication, and Signal Processing (pp. 161- 170). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9775-3_16 7. Jubair MA, Khaleefah SH, Budiyono A, Mostafa SA, Mustapha A (2018) Performance evaluation of AODV and OLSR routing protocols in MANET environment. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 8(4):1277-1283 8. Kashyap VK, Astya R, Nand P, Pandey G (2017) Comparative study of AODV and DSR routing protocols in wireless sensor network using NS-2 simulator, In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA) (pp. 687-690). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229889. g. Kaur A (2014) Mobility model based performance hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 enesitol2,119PM Performance analy of DSDV and OLSR wrsess sensor network outing protocols sh FPGA hardware and machine esming analysis of DSDV mobile ad hoc routing protocol. In International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE-2014) (pp.1-7). IEEE. doi: hittps:/ /doi.org/10.1109/ICRATE,2014.6909326. 10, Keerthiga R, Kalpana 8, Gomathi M (2019) Energy efficiency in cognitive wireless sensor network using DSDV protocol. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. doi: hittps://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCAN.2019.8878767. 11. Kumar DP, Amgoth T, Annavarapu CSR (2019) Machine learning algorithms for wireless sensor networks: a survey. Inform Fusion 49:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/).inffus.2018.09.013, 12. Kumar A, Sharma P, Gupta MK, Kumar R (2018) Machine learning based resource utilization and pre-estimation for network on Chip (NoC) communication, Wirel Pers Commun 102(3):2211-2231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-01 376-3, 13. Kumar H, Arora H, Singla RK (2011) Simulation analysis of optimized link state routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In 2011, hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 me5110122, 119PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning 14. 15. 16. 17. International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC) (pp. 192-194). IEEE. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1109/ETNCC.2011.5958514. Kumar P, Babu MN, Jain V (2017) Analysis of energy efficiency in WSN by considering SHM application. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 225, no. 1, p. 012231). IOP publishing. doizhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/225/1/012231 Liao J, Singh BK, Khalid MA, Tepe KE (2013) FPGA based wireless sensor node with customizable event-driven architecture. EURASIP J Embed Syst 2013(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-3963-2013-5 Morshed MM, Rahman MU, Rahman MH, Islam MR (2012) Performance comparison of TCP variants over AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR in NS- 2. In 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV) (pp. 1069-1074). IEEE. doi: https:/ /doi.org/10.1109/ICIEV.2012.6317478. Mohapatra S, Kanungo P (2012) Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator. Proced hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 anesitom2, 119 PM Peromance anasis of DSDV and OLSR wiless sensor nstworkrotng protools Using FPGA hardware and machine laring Eng 30:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.835 18. Mouiz A, Badri A, Baghdad A, Sahel A (2019) Performance evaluation of OLSR and AODV routing protocols with different parameters in Mobile ad-hoc networks using NS2 simulator. In Proceedings of the 2019, 5"" International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications (pp. 134-139). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11111409. 19. Mouiz A, Badri A, Baghdad A, Sahel A (2019) Analysis of energy consumption and evaluation of metric parameters of routing protocols in ad hoc (MANET) networks using: NS2 simulator. Journal of Communications, 14(11). doi:https://doi.org/10.12720/jem.14.11.1067- 1074. 20. Mostafa SA, Mustapha A, Ramli AA, Jubair MA, Hassan MH, Abbas AH (2020). Comparative analysis to the performance of three Mobile ad- hoe network routing protocols in time-critical events of search and rescue missions. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 117-123). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-51064-0 16. hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 ane511022,148PM Perfomance ana f DSDV and OLR witless sensor newark aun pool using FPGA harcore and machine erin, 21, Muruganantham N, El-Ocla H (2020) Routing using genetic algorithm in a wireless sensor network, Wirel Pers Commun 111:1-30. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-07011-8 22. Purkar SV, Deshpande RS (2018) Energy efficient clustering protocol to enhance performance of heterogeneous wireless sensor network: EECPEP-HWSN. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications 2018:1—-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2078627 23. Salem O, Guerassimov A, Mehaoua A, Marcus A, Furht B (2013) Anomaly detection scheme for medical wireless sensor networks. In Handbook of medical and healthcare technologies (pp. 207-222). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8495-0_8. 24, Shabbir N, Hassan SR (2017) Routing protocols for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In Wireless Sensor Networks-Insights and Innovations. Intech open, pp (36-40). 25. Spaho E, Ikeda M, Barolli L, Xhafa F (2013) Performance comparison of OLSR and AODV protocols in a VANET crossroad scenario. In Information Technology Convergence (pp. 37— hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 sone511022,1418PM _Perlomance ana f DSDV and OLR witless sensor newark aun pool using FPGA harcore and machine ering, 45). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0 5. 26, Varshovi H, Kavian YS, Ansari-Asl K (2019) Design and implementing wireless multimedia sensor network for movement detection using FPGA local co-processing. Multimed Tools Appl 78(13):17413-17435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7104-0 27. Waharte S, Boutaba R, Iraqi Y, Ishibashi B (2006) Routing protocols in wireless mesh networks: challenges and design considerations. Multimed Tools Appl 29(3):285-303. hitps://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0012-8 28. Yadav S, Yadav RS (2016) A review on energy- efficient protocols in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 22(1):335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1025-x 29. Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Netw 52(12):2292-2330. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.comnet..2008.04.002 0. Yang T, Barolli L, Ikeda M, Xhafa F, Durresi A (2009) Performance analysis of olsr protocol for wireless sensor networks and comparison hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 vesitol2,119PM Performance analy of DSDV and OLER wrsess sensor network oun protocols sh FPGA hardware and machine esming evaluation with AODV protocol. In 2009 International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (pp. 335-342). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/NBiS.2009.35. Author information Affiliations Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun, India Namit Gupta Faculty of Engineering & CS, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India Arpit Jain & Rajeev Kumar Department of Computer Science, B T Kumaon Institute of Technology Dwarahat, Dwarahat, India Kunwar Singh Vaisla Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India Adesh Kumar Corresponding author Correspondence to Arpit Jain. Ethics declarations Conflict of interest hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 sane5110122, 119PM Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions About this article Cite this article Gupta, N., Jain, A, Vaisla, KS. et al, Performance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network routing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learning. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 22301-22319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10820-4 Received Revised Accepted 29 April 2020 02 February 2021 10 March 2021 Published Issue Date 26 March 2021 June 2021 Dol https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10820-4 Keywords Wireless sensor network (WSN) hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 sane5710722,119PM Perfomance analysis of DSDV and OLSR wireless sensor network outing protocols using FPGA hardware and machine learing, Packet delivery ratio (PDR) Destination sequenced distance vector (DSDV) routing Optical link state routing (OLSR) Field programmable gate Array (FPGA) Machine learning model Not logged in- 103.116268 Not affliated SPRINGER NATURE © 2022 Springer Nature Switze nd AG, Part of Springer Nature, hitpsstink springer comvartcle/10.1007Is11042-021-10820-4 sane