Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abhyaas GS2-ModelAnswers 2022
Abhyaas GS2-ModelAnswers 2022
Abhyaas GS2-ModelAnswers 2022
1. Do you agree with the view that time has come to revisit the Seventh Schedule of the Indian
Constitution? Discuss with suitable arguments. (Answer in 150 words) 10
Approach:
• Give a brief overview of the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution.
• Discuss whether there is a need to revisit the Seventh Schedule.
• State whether status quo should be maintained in this context.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
The Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution (Article 246) provides the demarcation of the
legislative powers between the Centre and States through three Lists i.e. Union, Concurrent and
State. Despite several amendments in the Constitution, the Seventh Schedule has not been
comprehensively reviewed.
The need to revisit the Seventh Schedule arises due to the following:
• Evolving needs of governance: The needs of governance are not static and are bound to
change over time. Concerns such as climate change, emerging technologies, disaster
management, consumer protection etc., need to be incorporated in the Schedule.
• Increasing centralization: The Constitution expressly secures the predominance of the Union
List over the State List and the Concurrent List and that of the Concurrent List over the State
List. In case of overlapping between the Union List and Concurrent List, it is the former which
should prevail and between the Concurrent List and the State List, it is the Concurrent List that
should prevail. This impacts the power of the States in the Indian federal system. The residuary
powers have also been conferred on the Parliament.
• Encroachment over subjects in the State List: Since 1950, the number of subjects in the
Union List (from 97 to 100) and Concurrent List (from 47 to 52) have grown while subjects
under the State List (from 66 to 61) have gradually reduced. Additionally, the 42nd Amendment
Act, 1976, transferred five subjects i.e., education, forest, protection of wild animals and birds,
administration of justice, and weights and measurements to the Concurrent List.
• Need for decentralization: Despite the enactment of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional
Amendment Acts, there has been little progress with it comes to decentralisation to both rural
and urban local bodies. This can be done by revising the division of powers at the local level in
clear terms.
• Appropriate placement: Some subjects need to be transferred to the State list or the
Concurrent List keeping in mind the inter-State asymmetry, diversity of cultural groups and
federal ethos. For instance, although mentioned explicitly under the State list, ‘land’ overlaps
with acquisition and requisition of property (Entry 42 of the Concurrent list), and transfer of
property other than agricultural land (Entry 6 of Concurrent list). Similarly, labour regulation
mostly depends on the level of development and therefore should be the sole domain of the
States.
2. Highlighting the advantages of online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanism for justice delivery,
discuss the challenges associated with its effective implementation in India. (Answer in 150
words) 10
Approach:
• Briefly explain what you understand by online dispute resolution (ODR).
• Highlight its advantages for justice delivery.
• Discuss the various challenges with respect to its effective implementation.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Online dispute resolution (ODR) refers to the process of using technology for dispute avoidance,
containment and resolution outside the traditional court system with the techniques of Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR), such as arbitration, conciliation and mediation. As a dispute resolution
avenue, it can be provided both as an extension of the public court system and outside of it.
Advantages of online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanism:
• Cost-effective: The economic burden of dispute resolution often turns the justice delivery
process itself into a punishment and thereby hinders access to justice. In this light, ODR offers a
cost-effective mode of dispute resolution and has the potential to reduce legal costs by way of
reduced time for resolution.
• Allows for customisable processes: ODR’s integration with non-traditional ODR processes
and use of artificial intelligence can lead to limitless possibilities in terms of the types of models
that can be developed. Thus, ODR can allow for multi-door dispute resolution through curated
and customized processes for certain classes of cases.
• Limits implicit bias caused by human judgment: ODR platforms, especially those based on
texts and emails, detach audio-visual cues relating to gender, social status, ethnicity, race, etc.
and help in resolving disputes based on the claims and information submitted by the disputing
parties, rather than who the parties are.
• Encourages dispute resolution: ODR encourages more parties to opt to resolve their disputes
by addressing major concerns such as lack of access to physical courts or ADR centres, cost of
dispute resolution, barriers due to disabilities etc.
The challenges associated with ODR include the following:
• Digital divide: ODR requires a basic level of digital literacy as a prerequisite. Further, broad-
based adoption of ODR will require essential digital technology infrastructure across the
country.
2 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Privacy and confidentiality concerns: Greater integration of technology and reduced face-to-
face interactions create new challenges for privacy and confidentiality, which include online
impersonation, tampering of digital evidence etc. Besides, online platforms are susceptible to
cyber attacks, data theft, phishing and hacking.
• Lack of trust in ODR services: A lot of people in the country do not trust the emerging
technology, which is a major challenge for the people of India.
• Archaic legal processes: The archaic processes do not work well with the end-to-end online
process of dispute resolution and create barriers for ODR. Further, in India there is no provision
for online notarization of documents.
ODR mechanism needs mass awareness and training through social media, education, workshops
and campaigns etc. at the grassroots level. Further, financial aid to ODR projects to create technical
and administrative infrastructure is the need of the hour.
3. Despite the constitutional division of powers, Centre-state disputes have been a perennial
feature of Indian democracy. Discuss with examples. (Answer in 150 words) 10
Approach:
• Briefly write about the Constitutional division of power between the Centre and States.
• With the help of examples, discuss how the Centre-State disputes have been a perennial feature
of Indian democracy.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
The Indian Constitution explicitly demarcates the powers between the Centre and States in terms of
legislative, administrative and financial relations within Part XI under Articles 245-263.
Furthermore, Article 246 of the Constitution provides for the Seventh Schedule, which divides the
legislative powers by providing three lists–Union List, State List and Concurrent List – which
enumerate the matters over which the Parliament or the State Assemblies or both have exclusive
powers to make laws.
While the debate on federalism and the distribution of powers between the Centre and states in
India date back to the formation of the Constitution, Centre-State disputes have been a perennial
feature of Indian democracy. This can be discerned from the following:
• Encroachment over the State subjects:
o The enactment of three farm laws was argued by some to be an encroachment upon the
State List as ‘agriculture’ and its associated subsidiary enterprises, and ‘markets’ are State
List Subjects.
o Invocation of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 during the COVID-19 pandemic
made the Central guidelines binding on States, even though 'public health’ is a State matter
on which the Parliament cannot legislate.
o The Chhattisgarh government filed a suit against the Central government against the
National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 on the ground that it encroaches upon States’
power to maintain law and order.
o Similarly, the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 has been amended to bring cooperative banks
under the RBI supervision. However, ‘cooperative societies’ come under the State List.
• Expansion of the Concurrent list: Through the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976, five subjects-
education, forests, weights & measures, protection of wild animals and birds and administration
of justice were transferred from the State List to the Concurrent List.
• Over-centralising tendencies by the Central government: There are disputes over the
Centre passing legislations/adopting policies, which affect the legal or Constitutional rights of
the States. For instance:
o The Centre’s proposed amendments to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) (Cadre)
Rules of 1954 have triggered a conflict between the Centre and the States, as larger control
is being provided to the Union government over deputation of the IAS officers and the
power of the States to veto Centre’s request for officers is being taken away.
4. Do you agree with the view that adopting a framework for lobbying will strengthen
participative governance and ease of doing business in India? (Answer in 150 words) 10
Approach:
• Give a brief introduction about lobbying.
• Discuss the need for adopting a framework for lobbying by highlighting how it could strengthen
participative governance and ease of doing business in India.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Lobbying is an activity, which is carried out by individuals or private interest groups to influence
the decisions of the government. It is a form of “political persuasion” that is aimed at influencing the
formulation and/or implementation of the policy and decision-making process regarding legislative
or regulatory activities.
Countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany and Taiwan treat lobbying as a legitimate
right of citizens and thus have a framework to regulate lobbying. Further, no country in the world,
including India, has banned lobbying. Though, at present, India does not have any legal framework
for lobbying, adopting a framework for lobbying will strengthen participative governance and ease
of doing business in India, due to the following reasons:
• Makes the governance process more accessible and participative: Lobbying presents an
opportunity for various individuals, pressure groups, etc. to present their case to the
government in matters of policy formulation and implementation. Thus, a shift to lobbying as a
means of engaging with the legislative process would further the ideals of participative
democracy.
• Conducive to promoting business environment: Institutions like FICCI, CII, ASSOCHAM have
worked for decades and influenced pivotal decisions and policy issues. A lobbying framework
would further ease the process in terms of accessibility in getting hold of the policy formulators.
• Level playing field to businesses: A formal framework would enable minor players to put
forth their policy suggestions as against the monopoly of the major players.
• Acts as a catalyst for democratic reforms: Adopting a framework for lobbying will enable
debates and discussions on various forums to create pressure on the government to bring about
reforms. One of the most successful examples is the demand led by the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti
Sangathan (MKSS), which manifested into the Right to Information Act, 2005.
• Brings expertise and domain specialization to policy formulation: Lobbyists provide the
government with valuable policy-related information and expertise, which the full-time
politicians may not possess.
Although lobbying by various interest and advocacy groups is widespread in India, it is brought to
light usually through negative news, for example, the Walmart case. A law to regulate lobbying could
pave the way for transparency in the policy-making process. However, a legislation on lobbying
should not legitimize bribery or corrupt practices. For this, lobbying should be unambiguously
defined to include only those activities that further the ideals of participative democracy.
8. Do you agree with the view that time has come to formulate an Urban Employment Guarantee
scheme at the national level? (Answer in 150 words) 10
Approach:
• Introduce by explaining the idea of an Urban Employment Guarantee scheme.
• Discuss the need of an Urban Employment Guarantee scheme at the national level.
• State the challenges associated with the scheme.
• Conclude accordingly.
7 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Answer:
The core idea of an Urban Employment Guarantee scheme is that the government guarantees
work at a minimum wage in order to create public assets and provide income support to the urban
poor. In light of the growing distress among the urban poor, it is argued that time has come to
formulate an Urban Employment Guarantee scheme at the national level. The scheme is expected to
help in the following ways:
• Reduce unemployment: As per the Periodic Labour Force Survey 2019-20, unemployment
rate in urban areas was around 7% as compared to approximately 4% in rural areas. Such a
programme would give a statutory right to livelihood to urban residents.
• Relief from COVID-19 Impact: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in urban areas was
higher in terms of stalled economic activities. It reduced consumption with a negative impact on
employment generation and security of existing jobs.
• Reduce inequalities: Such a scheme would have some redistributive effect and could help
reduce inequality in terms of income as well as health and education.
• Tackle inflation: There is persistence of higher inflation in urban areas as compared to rural
areas, which is negatively affecting the urban poor.
• Rising urban population: In comparison to nearly 31% population (Census, 2011), the
percentage of urban population is expected to grow above 40% by 2030, thereby increasing the
demand for employment further.
• Uniformity across states: Although initiatives have been taken in many states, the central
government should join in to tackle the issues of division of responsibility of returning migrant
workers, pay standards, financial assistance etc.
• Multiplier effect on the economy: Money in the hands of people would drive up demand in
urban areas and may help establish urban areas as ‘engines of growth’.
• Strengthen infrastructure: If implemented effectively, it enables people to contribute
productively to the creation of useful public goods and services.
However, there would be some challenges associated with guaranteeing urban employment, such
as:
• It may lead to increased migration in urban areas, thereby increasing pressure on the
existing infrastructure and amenities.
• Since it would be implemented mostly by local governments, their lack of human as well as
financial capacity would be a major hurdle.
• Deciding the criterion for employment in terms of variety of work, range of skills and
education levels as well as generating new jobs in urban areas would be difficult. It is also
debatable whether the educated but unemployed workers will take up these jobs.
• In urban areas, there is no seasonality in either work demanded or unemployment. This
complicates the design of the scheme unlike the MNREGA where demand for work moves in line
with the agricultural cycle and hence is seasonal in nature.
Thus, even though it seems that time has come for a National Urban Employment Guarantee Act,
various steps would be needed to address the challenges first. These include coordination
mechanism between different associated Ministries (Labour, Commerce and Industry, Housing and
Urban Affairs, etc.), mobilising investment, simultaneously focusing on rural development to reduce
migration etc.
17. Public-Private Partnership model, if harnessed properly, has the potential to bridge the gaps in
India's healthcare system. Discuss. (Answer in 250 words) 15
Approach:
• Briefly write about the issues faced by the healthcare sector in India.
• Discuss how the Public-Private Partnership model can improve the healthcare sector.
• Write some relevant examples to support your arguments.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Since independence, the government has taken various measures to improve and make available
healthcare services for all. These include establishment of government hospitals, launch of the
National Health Mission, formulation of the National Health Policy etc.
Despite these measures, various gaps exist with regard to India’s healthcare systems, including:
• Rural-urban divide: About 75 percent of healthcare infrastructure is found in the urban areas
where only around 27 percent of the Indian population resides. This means that the 73 percent
population living in rural areas lack access to even primary healthcare facilities.
• Inadequate healthcare resources: India has a huge shortage of doctors, nurses and
paramedics. While the WHO recommends one doctor for every 1,000 people, India stands at
1:1445 in this regard.
• High out-of-pocket expenditure: The government spends a mere 1.13 percent of GDP on
healthcare, with almost 65 percent of healthcare expenditure coming out from the pockets of
citizens. This pushes millions of people further into poverty each year.
• Low penetration of insurance: Despite the implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya
Yojana (PM-JAY) and other government insurance schemes, at least 30% of the population is
devoid of any financial protection for health, as per the NITI Ayog’s report.
In this context, public-private partnership model can provide solutions, which can improve
access to healthcare in India in the following ways:
• Expertise and finance: It can improve the healthcare system by pooling in the expertise and
finances of the private sector with the access and subsidies of the public sector.
o For example, Rajiv Gandhi Super Specialty Hospital in Raichur, Karnataka is a joint venture
of the Government of Karnataka and the Apollo Hospitals Group, with financial support from
OPEC. This partnership provides super-specialty healthcare at low cost to the people living
below the poverty Line.
• Improve efficiency in public hospitals: The services provided by the government hospitals
are marred by inefficiency. In this context, the experience and management expertise of the
private sector in building and running successful organizations can be crucial in revamping
medical facilities.
o For instance, management of Primary Health Centers in Gumballi and Sugganahalli was
contracted out by the government of Karnataka to Karuna Trust in 1996 to serve the tribal
community in the hilly areas.
• Accessibility: The government can provide infrastructure for the private sector to operate,
making it commercially viable for the private sector to provide healthcare services at low cost.
The private sector, due to lower cost of capital requirement, can open its facilities even in small
towns.
o The Urban Slum Health Care Project in Andhra Pradesh is a contract to manage health
centers in the slums of Adilabad by NGOs. To serve 3 million people, the project has
established 192 Urban Health Centers.
18. Although the New Education Policy brings with itself a commendable vision, its success will
depend on its ability to effectively integrate with the government’s other policy initiatives.
Discuss. (Answer in 250 words) 15
Approach:
• Write a short note on India’s New Education Policy and discuss its key features.
• Highlight the significance of its integration with other policy initiatives of the government.
• Mention loopholes in this context.
• Conclude in an appropriate manner.
Answer:
The New Education Policy (NEP), 2020, being India’s only third education policy document,
introduces a variety of changes encompassing a firm grasp on the current socio-economic landscape
and the prospect of future uncertainty.
Its salient features include:
• Keeping pace with digitalisation: Education must engage with the increasing
dematerialisation and digitalisation of our economies that require a completely new set of
capabilities. The NEP is a step forward in that direction.
• Changing workforce requirements: The future of work is going to be fast-changing and with a
much larger gig economy. It will need an agile workforce, which can quickly adapt to changing
labour force requirements. The NEP recognises this shift and therefore puts flexibility at the
core of its vision for education.
• Curriculum: The Policy focuses on conceptual rather than rote learning and there is emphasis
on soft skills like communication, leadership and teamwork.
• Interdisciplinarity: Emerging challenges such as building resilience to climate change,
disruptive emerging technologies etc. shall require a workforce that is able to draw on cross-
cutting competencies. The NEP breaks down silos and encourages interdisciplinarity to create a
holistic workforce.
• Language: The Policy promotes regional languages as the medium of instruction till secondary
school. Its focus on promoting multilingualism and reviving proficiency in local languages could
help diversify digital content.
• Technology-driven systems: The NEP puts technology at the core and encourages ideas such
as the use of adaptive software to provide tailored and flexible lessons, blended learning and the
use of AI software to track students’ progress.
• Inclusion: The NEP recognises the need for inclusivity and makes provisions for policy design
to address the existing disparities.
Regardless of its commendable vision, the potency of the NEP will depend on its ability to integrate
with other policy initiatives of the government like Digital India, Skill India and the New
Industrial Policy to effect a coherent structural transfiguration.
• Policy linkages can ensure that the NEP contributes to and learns from Skill India’s experience
in engaging more dynamically with the private sector to shape vocational education
curricula and make it a success.
• New Industrial policy can help with more evidence-based decision-making with regard to the
curricula and to adapt to rapidly evolving shifts and disruption in industries.
19. The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) is born from a collective desire to
make the Indo-Pacific region an engine of global economic growth. Comment. Also, discuss
India's concerns in this context. (Answer in 250 words) 15
Approach:
• Briefly explain Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) in the introduction.
• Highlighting how it is born from a collective desire, discuss how it will act as an engine of global
economic growth.
• Mention its significance and India's concerns.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
IPEF (Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity) is a U.S.-led framework for
participating countries to solidify their relationships and engage in crucial economic and trade
matters that concern the region, such as building resilient supply chains battered by the pandemic.
It is being seen as a means to counter China in the region.
IPEF is borne out of collective desire and is not a traditional trade agreement. Rather, it includes
different modules covering “fair and resilient trade, supply chain resilience, infrastructure and
decarbonization, and tax and anticorruption”. Countries would have to sign up to all of the
components within a module, but do not have to participate in all modules. It does not include
market access commitments such as lowering tariff barriers, as the agreement is “more of an
administrative arrangement”.
IPEF as an engine of global economic growth:
• Digital trade: There is focus on Digital trade. It incorporates not just the purchase and sale
of goods online but also data flows that enable the operation of global value chains and
services, like smart manufacturing, platforms and applications. The idea here is to
overcome downstream costs for businesses as well as upscale the ability to utilize data
processing and analysis, and enhance cybersecurity outside their geographies.
• Supply chain resilience: The framework aspires to secure access to key raw and
processed materials, semiconductors, critical minerals and clean energy tech, particularly
for crisis response measures and ensuring business continuity. This will bring more
transparency, more communication, more data-sharing and an early alert system to deal
with any eventuality.
• Green growth: In line with the Paris Agreement, the clean energy, decarbonisation and
infrastructure pillar would provide technical assistance and help mobilize finance,
including concessional finance, to improve competitiveness and enhance connectivity by
supporting countries in the development of sustainable and durable infrastructure for
adopting renewable energy.
• Taxation: Lastly, the pillar on tax and anti-corruption is aimed at promoting fair
competition by enforcing robust tax, anti-money laundering and anti-bribery regimes in
20. India needs to identify the priority areas to further its techno-diplomacy amidst the
complexities of expanding digital space and New and Emerging Strategic Technologies. Discuss.
(Answer in 250 words) 15
Approach:
• Introduce the answer with a brief definition of techno-diplomacy and discuss its need.
• State the challenges faced owing to the emerging technologies for nations.
• Mention the areas of focus for Indian techno-diplomacy to be effective and substantiate with
examples.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Techno-diplomacy refers to the art and practice of conducting negotiations between countries with
conflicting technological interests. It is also the ability to cooperate on science and technology when
political relations are extremely difficult. A country’s technological capacity and innovation are
linked to its national identity. These can manifest in protectionist tendencies, narratives on self-
reliance, and the ‘weaponization’ of technology flows.
Expanding digital spaces and emerging strategic technologies comes with increased
complexities, such as:
• International rules and institutions that manage the global technology system remain largely
in a state of flux. Further, multilateral negotiations on state behaviour in cyberspace are
fractured.
• International negotiations relating to lethal autonomous weapons often end in stalemates.
• E-commerce regulations globally are mired in debates around equity.
• Standard-setting organisations have become a new frontier for exerting geo-economic
influence.
In this backdrop, India must focus on the following priority areas to improve and enhance its
techno-diplomacy:
• Manage its dependence on China: Given that Chinese investors are the one of the largest
actors in India’s technology landscape, it has raised concerns of cyber-espionage, forced
technology transfer, and the introduction of cyber-vulnerabilities. A long-term strategy for
India would be to continue to attract investments, restrict some markets where national
security is at stake, use legal and regulatory tools to obtain technology and know-how, and
create oversight mechanisms for effective technology intervention.
20 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Navigating technological protectionism: Though India is an integral part of new issue-based
coalitions such as the Quadrilateral Initiative or the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence,
it should not ignore national and international restrictions that may create unexpected, second-
order effects or harm its development or security interests.
• Global data governance: Cross-border data flows and related rules and regulations are
important domains in this regard. With countries like China, Mexico and the US vying to set
their own rules for data flows and security, India must sort its conceptual (how the government
defines ‘data’ and prescribes the attendant rights and limitations) and organisational hurdles, if
it is to align its domestic and international policy tools for data governance.
• Setting standards: India needs to clarify its position on international law as it applies to
cyberspace and related emerging technologies regimes. There should be a unified and coherent
approach from India’s engagement with international institutions towards standards and
norms. India can take the cue from China (leading actor in organisations such as Internet
Society, IEEE and ITU) in setting standards for a broad range of industries that use AI, IoT, 5G
and other frontier technologies.
• Private sector engagement: A clear path for India’s private sector in terms of its role, extent
and capacity building in formulating global norms for emerging technologies can be chalked out
to enhance the level of coordination between the government and industry.
• Presence at international norm-making forums: India must enhance its presence and
participation in important emerging technology-linked rule-setting and norm-making processes
such as the Budapest Convention, UN GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons and the OEWG on
Responsible Behaviour in Cyberspace, in order to have a say in these matters. India can also
endorse the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace.
The establishment of the New, Emerging and Strategic Technologies (NEST) division under the
ambit of the Ministry of External Affairs points to an acknowledgment that emerging technologies
should be a pillar of India’s foreign policy in their own right.