Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Construction and Eating Disorders....
Social Construction and Eating Disorders....
Introduction:
Eating disorders, complex mental health conditions, are significantly influenced by various
societal factors, including cultural norms, media representation, and socioeconomic status. In
Pakistani society, these factors play a substantial role in shaping individuals' attitudes towards
body image and food, potentially leading to the development of eating disorders.
1. Increased Prevalence: The societal pressure to conform to unrealistic beauty standards and
norms contributes to a higher prevalence of eating disorders, particularly among women and
young adults.
3. Physical Health Consequences: Disordered eating behaviors, such as restrictive dieting, binge
eating, and purging, can have severe physical health consequences, including malnutrition,
gastrointestinal issues, and cardiovascular problems.
4. Social Isolation: Stigma surrounding eating disorders and misconceptions about them can lead
to social isolation and hinder individuals from seeking support from friends, family, and
healthcare professionals.
5. Barriers to Treatment: The stigma associated with mental health issues and the lack of
awareness about eating disorders create significant barriers to accessing appropriate treatment
and support services.
Conclusion:
In Pakistani society, social constructs related to body image, food culture, stigma surrounding
mental health, gender norms, and socioeconomic status significantly influence the prevalence
and manifestation of eating disorders. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive
approach that involves promoting body positivity, raising awareness about mental health,
challenging societal norms, and ensuring access to appropriate support and treatment.
References:
Masood, A., Nadeem, M., Saeed, A., Tariq, M., & Majeed, S. (2017). The Role of Mass Media in
Perpetuating Eating Disorders: A Study of Pakistani Print and Electronic Media. Pakistan Journal
of Psychological Research, 32(2), 409-423.