Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kaizen 3
Kaizen 3
Kaizen 3
Deming’s material has been twisted, taken out of context and without
understanding, then put forth in Japanese that no one in the West
properly understands. For example “Jidoka” translates into English as
“magnetic clay”. Who wouldn’t want some of that! Imagine what it
could do for quality!
“Kaizen means all personnel are expected to stop their work when they encounter any abnormality and,
along with their supervisor, suggest an improvement to resolve the abnormality.”
“Jidoka is an integral part of Lean principles that focuses on optimizing the flow of production processes.
It plays a crucial role in helping organizations become more efficient and productive by reducing waste,
enhancing quality, and increasing customer satisfaction. Jidoka is based on the idea that any defect
should be detected immediately so the process can be stopped until the root cause of the problem is
identified and corrected. This helps eliminate wasted time, resources, and energy from running
defective parts through a production line.”
“A well-known quality control mechanism from Toyota is the Andon cord. The cord is a way to alert
others of issues on the production line; everyone has the authority to pull the cord. Pulling the cord
immediately stops production and broadcasts a signal, alerting others that there is a critical issue that
needs an immediate response.
The next step is the hardest for any organization: stopping the line. In Lean, this concept is called
jidoka. It follows the theory that to have the best quality for your product and the best
opportunity for continuous improvement, you must stop all production when an issue occurs and
fix the issue before resuming work.
“Andon Cord”
When diesel-electric and full electric locomotives were developed in the 1930’s, the concept of the
‘deadman’ control was adopted from street railways.
https://archives.njit.edu/vol01/etd/1980s/1986/njit-etd1986-010/njit-etd1986-010.pdf
unexpected faults … class action on rodents chewing soy based car wiring.
The basic philosophy of the Toyota Production System is based on two pillars. The first pillar is
jidoka―which can be loosely translated as "automation with a human touch"―based on the
concepts of stopping immediately when abnormalities are detected to prevent defective products
from being produced and improving productivity to eliminate the need for people to be simply
watching over machines. The second pillar is Just-in-Time, based on the concept of
synchronizing production processes―linking all plants and their production processes in a
continuous flow―by making only what is needed, when it is needed, and in the amount needed.
These two pillars enable the production of vehicles that satisfy customer requirements quickly, at
a low cost, and with high quality.
Jidoka
Jidoka in the TPS is "automation with a human touch," where human wisdom is added to
automation. Human wisdom means that when an abnormality occurs, such as a machine or
equipment abnormality, quality abnormality, or a work delay, the machine or equipment can
detect the abnormality and stop automatically, or the operator can stop the line by pulling the
stop cord themselves.
Emiliani - “ignored the people aspects of TPS – specifically, the “Respect for People” principle,”
Notice that when I coined the terms “Real Lean” and “Fake Lean,” their meaning was very simple as
shown in the image above: “Fake Lean” was the technical application of “Continuous Improvement”
tools and methods, invariably in a zero-sum fashion. It is the dehumanized form of Lean which does not
deliver good business results. Nor does it result in the development of human capabilities. “Real Lean”
was the application of both “Continuous Improvement” and “Respect for People” – the two Toyota Way
principles — in a non-zero-sum fashion. Students clearly understood the term “Fake Lean” in the neutral
sense of characterizing a problem (the misunderstanding and misapplication of Lean principles and
practices), not in the negative sense of criticizing any particular company or leader. Rather, Fake Lean
was a common problem that