Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison - v3 - doPE This
Comparison - v3 - doPE This
net/publication/288029692
CITATIONS READS
7 152
1 author:
Lech Grodzki
Bialystok University of Technology
6 PUBLICATIONS 28 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Lech Grodzki on 09 March 2018.
Streszczenie. Liczba zastosowań LED w technice świetlnej stale rośnie. Coraz częściej uŜytkownikowi zaleŜy na funkcji regulacji strumienia
świetlnego emitowanego przez oprawę LED. Wymusza to stosowanie odpowiednich układów sterowania. Artykuł porównuje wybrane cechy dwóch
metod: popularnej modulacji PWM oraz sterowania stałoprądowego. Zwrócono uwagę na efektywność energetyczną tych metod oraz ich interakcję
z otoczeniem – Ŝywymi organizmami. (Porównanie impulsowej i stałoprądowej metody sterowania LED)
Keywords: PWM LED driving, constant-current LED driving, LED dimming, control efficiency
Słowa kluczowe: sterowanie PWM, sterowanie stałoprądowe, regulacja jasności LED, sprawność sterowania
ΦR 0,2
)
(4) IR = e 2 − 1
*
ΦR
According to formulas (3) and (4) it is possible to realize Φ
ΦR= [-]
open-loop system (without feedback) for obtaining needed ΦN
values of LED luminous flux. Fig. 4. The comparing of current consumption of PWM and
constant-current methods at the same ordered luminous flux ΦR*
The difference between the values of both currents for current one – easy approximated nonlinear function. These
the same luminous flux presents the figure 5. The visible on mathematical relations can be easy described in the
diagrams in figure 5 energy savings about 10% in the software of microcontroller, which becomes the typical
middle band of regulation range multiplied by the number of component of modern luminance control system.
LED lighting devices can give meaningful global energy During comparison of LED device luminance control
savings. So, it can be told, that luminance control by method except economic aspects, like energy-saving, also
constant-current LED driving is more effective than PWM functional quality should be taken into account. One of the
technique. elements of functional quality is the influence on human
eyesight and environment. There is no discussion, that
b)
∆IR =IRPWM -IRDC [-] constant-current LED driving causes continuous luminous
0,1 flux (like natural), observed by man, other living being,
plants, electronic equipment, etc. In the case of PWM
0,05 technique we have the sequence of strong light pulses,
which are observed by our eyesight as a continuous light
due to their frequency. We still do not know the real
Φ influence of long-lasting pulse lighting on our eyesight and
ΦR = [-]
ΦN especially on other living organisms.
Fig. 5. The difference between needed average currents as
function of ordered ΦR Conclusions
Because LED lighting are more and more popular, the
Comparing energy efficiency of both methods, energy luminance control of such lighting sources becomes more
losses in controlling circuits should be taken into account, important. The presented comparison of two the most
too. In PWM control circuit we can find two kinds of energy popular solutions for LED luminance control does not point
losses: the better one. The PWM technique, which has been used
1. Work losses ∆EP in transistor switches, which can be for several years, seems to be easy applicable, but we do
approximated as product of: switched-on transistor not know everything about its influence on the living
current IFN, transistor voltage drop ∆UTR and the current environment. Constant-current driving, little more difficult in
value of duty coefficient D: application, is probably more effective and safe for living
environments. The research works and technology progress
(5) ∆E P = I FN ⋅ ∆U TR ⋅ D should give the answers to the mentioned above problems,
in short time.
These losses are proportional to the value of duty
coefficient D and become the highest at the maximum Presented results are the part of research work No S/WE/1/11
luminance of LED device. The losses can be reduced by
selection the switching transistor with the lowest voltage REFERENCES
drop. [1] S c h u l c z G., Power Supplies for LED lighting, LUMEN V4,
2. Switching losses ∆EK of transistor in transient states Brno (2010), 204-206
during switching, which are more difficult to [2] W o j t k o ws k i W., Przekształtnik SEPIC do zastosowań
oświetleniowych z uŜyciem diod LED duŜej mocy, Przegląd
approximation. Because duration of switching processes Elektrotechniczny, 86 (2010), nr 10, 260-263
are constant, the value of switching losses ∆EK depends [3] Texas Instruments, LED Reference Design Cookbook, Jaros
mainly on frequency of PWM switching: Press (2010)
[4] National Semiconductors, LED Drivers for High-Brightness
(6) ∆E K = f PWM ⋅ ( ∆EON − OFF + ∆EOFF −ON ) Lighting, on www.national.com/LED, (2011)
[5] Allegro MicroSystems, Advances in WLED/RGB LED Drivers,
where: ∆EON-OFF means transistor losses during switch- Application Information, (2010), on www.allegromicro.com
off, and ∆EON-OFF – transistor losses during switch-on. [6] W o j t k o ws k i W., Wielokanałowa regulacja jasności świecenia
The losses ∆EK can be reduced by decreasing of diod LED z wykorzystaniem układów programowalnych FPGA,
switching frequency fPWM, but this frequency cannot be Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 85 (2009), nr 11, 310-312
decreased below some critical value (avoiding light [7] W o j t k o ws k i W., Wykorzystanie sprzętowych bloków PWM
mikrokontrolerów AVR do regulacji jasności świecenia diod
pulsation).
LED duŜej mocy, Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 85 (2009), nr 11,
In constant-current driving the main losses occur in the 306-309
outputs of regulated current sources: [8] G i l e ws k i M., Wielokanałowy, stałoprądowy układ zasilania
zespołów LED duŜej mocy, Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 86
(7) ∆E DC = I F ⋅ (U SUP − U F ) (2010), nr 10, 193-196
[9] G r o d z k i L., Constant-current Driving of the LED’s Group,
These losses are proportional to the value of LED supplying Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 86 (2010), nr 10, 203-205
current. They result from the need of some minimal value of [10] G r o d z k i L., Constant-current Driving of the RGB LED,
voltage on current source output and the changes of LED Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 86 (2010), nr 10, 200-202
forward voltage UF (as function of IF changes). The losses [11] Allegro MicroSystems, Constant-Current LED Drivers.
∆EDC can be reduced by appropriate supplying voltage USUP Application Information, (2007), on www.allegromicro.com
and serial-parallel connections of LEDs driven from the
common current source.
Author: Lech Grodzki, dr eng., Białystok University of Technology,
The precise energy losses analyse in both compared Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Wiejska 45D, 15-351 Bialystok,
methods can be subject of separate publication. E-mail: lgrodzki@we.pb.edu.pl
Both presented methods offer simple dependence
between controlled parameter and received luminous flux.
In PWM technique it is a linear function, and in constant-