(Download PDF) Data Storytelling and Visualization With Tableau A Hands On Approach 1St Edition Prachi Manoj Joshi Ebook Online Full Chapter

Data Storytelling and Visualization with
Tableau: A Hands-on Approach 1st

Edition Prachi Manoj Joshi
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-storytelling-and-visualization-with-tableau-a-han
ds-on-approach-1st-edition-prachi-manoj-joshi/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Hands-On Data Visualization: Interactive Storytelling

From Spreadsheets to Code 1st Edition Jack Dougherty
https://ebookmeta.com/product/hands-on-data-visualization-
interactive-storytelling-from-spreadsheets-to-code-1st-edition-
jack-dougherty/
Data Analytics and Visualization in Quality Analysis

using Tableau 1st Edition Hwang Jaejin Yoon Youngjin
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-analytics-and-visualization-
in-quality-analysis-using-tableau-1st-edition-hwang-jaejin-yoon-
youngjin/
AWS IoT With Edge ML and Cybersecurity: A Hands-On

Approach 1st Edition Syed Rehan
https://ebookmeta.com/product/aws-iot-with-edge-ml-and-
cybersecurity-a-hands-on-approach-1st-edition-syed-rehan/
AWS IoT With Edge ML and Cybersecurity: A Hands-On

Approach 1st Edition Syed Rehan
https://ebookmeta.com/product/aws-iot-with-edge-ml-and-
cybersecurity-a-hands-on-approach-1st-edition-syed-rehan-2/
Learn Quantum Computing with Python and Q#: A hands-on
approach 1st Edition Sarah C. Kaiser
https://ebookmeta.com/product/learn-quantum-computing-with-
python-and-q-a-hands-on-approach-1st-edition-sarah-c-kaiser/
Data Visualization: Exploring and Explaining with Data

Jeffrey D. Camm
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-visualization-exploring-and-
explaining-with-data-jeffrey-d-camm/
Data Visualization with Python and JavaScript 2nd

Edition Kyran Dale
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-visualization-with-python-and-
javascript-2nd-edition-kyran-dale/
Data Visualization with Python and JavaScript, 2nd

Edition Kyran Dale
https://ebookmeta.com/product/data-visualization-with-python-and-
javascript-2nd-edition-kyran-dale-2/
Beginning PyQt: A Hands-on Approach to GUI Programming

with PyQt6, 2nd Edition Joshua M Willman
https://ebookmeta.com/product/beginning-pyqt-a-hands-on-approach-
to-gui-programming-with-pyqt6-2nd-edition-joshua-m-willman/
CRC FOCUS
DATA STORYTELLING AND

VISUALIZATION WITH
TABLEAU
A Hands-on Approach
Prachi Manoj Joshi

and Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
Data Storytelling and
Visualization with Tableau
With the tremendous growth and availability of the data, this book covers
understanding the data, while telling a story with visualization including basic
concepts about the data, the relationship and the visualizations. All the technical
details that include installation and building the different visualizations are
explained in a clear and systematic way. Various aspects pertaining to
storytelling and visualization are explained in the book through Tableau.
Features
• Provides a hands-on approach in Tableau in a simplified manner

with steps
• Discusses the broad background of data and its fundamentals, from
the Internet of Everything to analytics
• Emphasizes the use of context in delivering the stories
• Presents case studies with the building of a dashboard
• Presents application areas and case studies with identification of the
impactful visualization
This book will be helpful for professionals, graduate students and senior
undergraduate students in Manufacturing Engineering, Civil and Mechanical
Engineering, Data Analytics and Data Visualization.
Data Storytelling and
Visualization with
Tableau
A Hands-on Approach
Prachi Manoj Joshi and

Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
CRC Press, Boca Raton and London
First edition published 2023
by CRC Press
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton,
FL 33487-2742
and by CRC Press
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2023 Prachi Manoj Joshi and Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and
information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility
for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The
authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of
all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright
holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If
any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let
us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book
may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by
any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission
from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this
work, access www.copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance
Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-
750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact
mpkbookspermissions@tandf.co.uk
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging‑in‑Publication Data
A catalog record has been requested for this book
ISBN: 978-1-032-30991-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-032-31035-0 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-003-30774-7 (ebk)
DOI: 10.1201/9781003307747
Typeset in Times
by MPS Limited, Dehradun
Contents
Preface vii
About the Authors ix
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Internet to Internet of Everything (IoE) 1
1.2 Big Data, Properties and Analytics 2
1.3 Issues and Challenges 7
1.4 Conclusion 9
References 9
2 Data Storytelling 11
2.1 Overview 11
2.2 Communicating with Data 14
2.3 Storytelling Context 18
2.4 Case Studies 19
2.5 Conclusion 30
References 31
3 Data Visualization 33
3.1 Need for Visualization 33
3.2 Communicating Visually 34
3.3 Visualization Myths and Reality 37
3.4 Ethics in Visualization 39
3.5 Right Graph for Right Data 43
3.6 Visualization for Storytelling 46
3.7 Conclusion 47
References 47
4 Visualization with Tableau 49

4.1 Overview 49
4.2 Functional Components 50
4.3 Types of Visualizations 56
4.4 Calculated Fields and Null Values 67
v
vi Contents
4.5 Interactive Dashboard 69

4.6 Creating Stories – A Case Study 72
4.7 Conclusion 74
References 74
5 Conclusion 75
5.1 Summary 75
5.2 Business Intelligence 76
5.3 Research Openings and Future Outlook 76
Index 79
Preface
‘You can claim your right on the work but not on the result’.
– Bhagwad Gita
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are the buzzwords
that are now heard. Their applicability is wide and they possess tremendous
potential to unveil meaningful insights with analytics. Understanding the data,
the patterns and the relationship is a critical factor prior to the selection,
development or usage of any AI/ML approaches. So, the fundamental
requirement is understanding the data and communicating effectively
through it. The necessity to answer questions for the audience using the
data with a story and through visualization is need of the time. This will assist
the data scientists and the analysts to make potential decisions, thus
addressing the Business Intelligence domain. Considering the above-
mentioned factors, it is rightful to provide interested readers with a book
that efficiently presents the data with a story in a wide range of impactful
visualizations. With the current range of available visualization tools, one of
the most powerful ones – Tableau – will help the reader to move toward
effective visualizations. This will enable novice readers and researchers to
know and create visualizations based on the data and their needs.
With the tremendous growth and availability of data, the book covers
understanding the data, while telling a story with visualization. The book offers
basic concepts about the data, the relationship and the visualizations. Through
visualizations, a story is conveyed that showcases meaningful insights in the data.
The book intends to provide a strong foundation in visualization to a novice
reader. All the technical details that include installation and building the different
visualizations are explained in a clear and systematic way. Various aspects
pertaining to storytelling and visualization are explained in the book allowing the
reader to gain an understanding about the importance and applicability of the
topic. A book to start the journey of a budding Data Viz designer!!
This book discusses challenges involved in dealing with the data, and the
need to present it in a comprehensive way. This book intends to provide a
pathway to the reader from story to visualization, thereby addressing the
answers required by the target audience.
vii
viii Preface
The main characteristics of this book are as follows:
• Provides a hands-on approach in Tableau in a simplified manner

with steps
• Numerous examples, technical descriptions and real-world scenarios
• A simple and easy language for a wide range of stakeholders from
a layman to educated users, villages to metros and national to
global levels
• Presents application areas and case studies with identification of the
impactful visualization
• Discusses the broad background of data and its fundamentals, from
the Internet of Everything to analytics
• Emphasizes the use of context in delivering the stories
• Presents case studies with the building of a dashboard
• A concise and crisp book that provides content from an introduction
to building basic visualizations for the novice reader/viz designer
In a nutshell, this book displays all information (basics) that a novice and
advanced reader needs to know regarding the data – its story and visualization.
The book also discusses the selection and use of visualization techniques. The
book also contributes to creating effective visualizations with applicability.
Data storytelling, visualizations and their applications to various branches of
science, technology and engineering are now fundamental courses in all
undergraduate and postgraduate courses in the field. Many universities and
autonomous institutes across the globe have started an undergraduate program
titled ‘Artificial Intelligence and Data Science’ as well as honors programs in
the same subject which are open for all branches of engineering. Thus, this book
is useful for all undergraduate students of these courses for a better
understanding of data, its visualization, project development and product
design in data science, ML and AI. This book is also useful for a wider
range of researchers and design engineers who are concerned with exploring
data science for engineering use cases. Essentially, this book is most useful to
all entrepreneurs who are interested in starting their start-ups in the field of
applications of data science to the civil, mechanical, chemical engineering and
healthcare domains as well as related product development. The book is useful
for undergraduates, postgraduates, industry, researchers and research scholars
in Information and Communications Technology, and we are sure that this book
will be well received by all stakeholders.
Prachi Manoj Joshi

Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
About the Authors
Dr. Prachi Manoj Joshi is an Associate Professor and Associate Head with
the Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science at BRACT’S,
Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
She obtained her B.E. and M.Tech degrees in Computer Engineering from
COEP (College of Engineering, Pune), University of Pune, India. She
obtained her PhD in Computer Engineering in Machine Learning from
COEP, University of Pune. She has more than 15 years of experience in
academics and research. She has co-authored a book on Artificial Intelligence
(PHI) and written book chapters for Research Methodology, published by
CRC, and has multiple research publications to her credit. She has
successfully supervised a plethora of projects for graduate and postgraduate
students encompassing the domains of Artificial Intelligence, Data Mining
and Machine Learning. Her research interests include Information Retrieval
and Incremental Machine Learning.
Dr. Parikshit Narendra Mahalle is a senior member of the IEEE and

Professor and Head of Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data
Science at Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, Pune,
Maharashtra, India. He obtained his PhD from Aalborg University,
Denmark and continued as a Post Doc Researcher at CMI, Copenhagen,
Denmark. He has more than 22 years of experience of teaching and
research. He is a member of the Board of Studies in Computer Engineering,
Ex-Chairman of Information Technology, Savitribai Phule Pune University
and various universities and autonomous colleges across India. He has nine
patents, more than 200 research publications (Google Scholar citations-
2092+, H index-21 and Scopus Citations are 1000+ with H index-15) and
has authored/edited more than 40 books with Springer, CRC Press,
Cambridge University Press, etc. He is the editor in chief for the
International Journal of Rough Sets and Data Analysis, Associate Editor
for the International Journal of Synthetic Emotions and the Inderscience
International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing and a member of the
ix
x About the Authors
Editorial Review Board for the International Journal of Ambient Computing

and Intelligence. All these journals are published by IGI Global. His research
interests include Machine Learning, Data Science, Algorithms, Internet of
Things, Identity Management and Security. He is a recognized PhD guide of
SSPU, Pune, and guiding seven PhD students in the area of IoT and Machine
Learning. Recently, four students have successfully defended their PhDs. He
has been the recipient of the ‘Best Faculty Award’ by Sinhgad Institutes and
Cognizant Technologies Solutions. He has delivered 200+ lectures at national
and international levels.
Introduction
1
1.1 INTERNET TO INTERNET OF
EVERYTHING (IOE)
As stated by Mark Weiser [1], the number of devices and users connected to
Internet will grow exponentially and cross 30 billion and there will be almost
four devices per person on average. There has been also rapid advancement in
the broadband technology over the decades resulting into high-speed and low-
cost Internet with the wide availability across the globe. Today, the Internet is
driving the world economy as most businesses rely on it and has also became
the strongest pillar of e-commerce and m-commerce. In addition, a very large-
scale integration technology is advancing at a faster rate producing the
powerful processors that are equally dense. This has also contributed to im-
prove the density to performance ratio significantly. Another key enabler is
the immense transformation in semiconductor industry which has caused
drastic decrease in the memory space as well as allied storage services such as
cloud. It has also resulted in lowering of the cost for data storage and man-
agement. Due to advancement in high-performance computing, distribution of
compute as well as processing power across multiple clusters in a decen-
tralized manner has improved significantly. This has also enabled the faster
data compute and analysis. Equally the sensor market is also improving in
terms of cost and functionalities. The sensor which costs INR 100 in the year
2000, costs INR 10 in 2020, and influential use of smartphones and tablets
will surely drive this market to the next level in near future.
In the sequel, the term Internet of Things (IoT) has been coined first by
Kevin Ashton [2] at Auto ID lab of MIT, USA. Kevin and his team was the
first to propose the global standards for Radio Frequency Identification and
sensors. IoT is defined as a service and resource-constrained network which
DOI: 10.1201/9781003307747-1 1
2 Data Storytelling and Visualization with Tableau
connects every object, surrounding us, to the Internet. The main functionalities
for anything to be connected to the Internet are sensing computing and com-
munication functionalities. The main objective of IoT is to provide seamless and
contextual services to all the stakeholders. Every IoT application consists three
major components: RFID objects, sensors and smartphones [3,4]. Information
and communication technology (ICT) is becoming an integral part of every use
case, and today IoT is driving all these ICT-enabled use cases across the globe.
The IoT application development is advancing at a faster rate due to
evolving storage platforms, sensors, programming platform and algorithmic
development. It is equally important to decide some factors of IoT use case
like whether it is indoor or outdoor use case, the component required to build
the underlined use case, access networks required, the cost of the application,
convergence technologies required and the context of the contents to be
generated by the use case. Eventually the term IoT is getting transformed into
the term Internet of Everything (IoE). The notion of IoE is much close to IoT
where things can be users or devices and the possible interactions can be
among user to user, user to device, device to device and device to user. IoE is
mainly causing the data explosion and constantly changing the unit of big
data. In 2015, a petabyte of data, i.e. 1024 terabytes precisely, probably met to
the people definition of the big data. However, by 2025 a petabyte of data will
no longer qualify as a big data at least in the enterprise. The data explosion
mainly includes emails, Google searches, Facebook messages, Tweets mes-
sages and the sensory data generated by multiple IoE use cases deployed in
the ecosystem. For only smart home IoT use case, allied IoT management
systems are incident management system, building management system,
physical access control system, video management system, GIS, HR learning
management system, etc. Users, security ops and communication center are
the major stakeholders for these use cases that are interacting with the IoT and
outside world. The term big data and respective terminologies as well as
challenges are presented and discussed in the next section of this chapter.
1.2 BIG DATA, PROPERTIES AND

ANALYTICS
The big data is defined in different ways in the literature. As stated in one study
[5], big data presents a type of data source that satisfies certain properties re-
garding the data. Prominent features which constitute four Vs of the big data are
listed below:
1 • Introduction 3
• Volume: Deals with extremely complex and large volumes of data

that essentially cannot be accommodated on the local storage and
require huge remote storage on the web.
• Velocity: Deals with the data which is generated from real-time
applications and the movement of data is at a high velocity of speed.
• Variety: Deals with the data collected from multisensory and het-
erogeneous sources
• Veracity: Deals with the important factor regarding the source of
data as objectives of the data highly depends on the authenticate
source of the data.
In the era of IoE, the majority of the enterprises work in Silos where main
concerns are information technology infrastructure and corporate security of
all the stakeholders. Diversified things, devices, objects, respective identity
and access management solutions [6] and smart mobile devices which are
actively participating in all the transactions are the key components con-
tributing to the big data. In general, the data, compute and algorithms are the
three main parts of any analytics. Considering the four Vs of big data, ana-
lytics on this data requires complex and proactive algorithms which can ac-
commodate constraints like dynamic and rapid changes in the data variables
(date, time of weather, sensors or customer credentials, etc.), changing pat-
terns and the scalability. Algorithms for analytics are generally implemented
in emerging programming languages such as Java, Python, R and are sup-
ported by a rich set of libraries to perform several learning operations such as
machine learning, deep learning, etc. [7]. These languages are supported by
active open-source communities toward regular code pupations, new ideas
and customization for the underlined business problems. The traditional al-
gorithms are different from the analytics algorithms in many ways and the
difference is presented in Table 1.1.
Analysis is mainly carried out based on three approaches: descriptive
analytics, predictive analytics and prescriptive analytics. Consider the example
of dataset for the Bridges across India. The underlined dataset consist of dif-
ferent fields such as date of construction, type of bridge, type of construction,
length of the bridge, material science of the bridge, etc. With respect to this
example dataset, three types of analytics are explained below:
1. Descriptive Analytics
This analytics deals with the current context of the dataset. It is important to
understand the past data for better understanding of the current context in
terms of business intelligence. Based on the underlined dataset, the specific
description of the dataset can be obtained.
TABLE 1.1 Traditional Algorithm vs Analytics Algorithms

SR. NO TRADITIONAL ALGORITHMS ANALYTICS ALGORITHMS
1 Accuracy depends on the Accuracy depends on the data
algorithm
2 It outputs data It takes input as data
3 It is based on the rules There are no rules in analytics
algorithms
4 Variable values are based on Variable values are based on the
statistical calculations process of training
5 Input + Program = Output Input + Output = Program
6 Follows mathematical approach Follows data-oriented and data-
intensive approach
7 The orientation is on The orientation is on prediction
interpretation
8 E.g. Bubble Sort Algorithm E.g. Classification or Clustering
Example: How many times the bridge was repaired during the period of
2018 to 2021?
2. Predictive Analytics
It uses analytics algorithms based on the learning techniques by anticipation
process. In this analytics, the patterns and anomalies are studied and used for
the prediction purpose and to draw more meaningful insights as well as in-
ferences. The main objective of predictive analytics is to look into the future
for better business perceptive.
Example: How many bridge accidents are likely to occur in next two years?
3. Prescriptive Analytics
This analytics works on the outcome of predictive analytics and provides set
of recommendations in order to improve more on the business intelligence.
This analytics helps to answer the question of the form ‘What should be
done?’, ‘What can we do for ….?’, etc.
Example: In above example if the predictive analytics is giving predic-
tions of two accidents. Then prescriptive analytics suggest what can be done
so that in next two years there will be no bridge accidents.
The main success of any analytics algorithm is based on your under-
standing about the data pertaining to the given problem. In addition to this, the
accuracy of predictions and forecasting highly depends on the type of data,
errors in data and faults in data.
Business decisions are generally made on dynamic and constantly vo-

latile data coming from a variety of sources. The two main sources of the data
are as follows:
• Internal Data: This includes the record data from traditional ap-
plications such as customer details, health records, payroll data,
finance-related data, etc.
• External Data: This includes the data from external sources such as
mobile data, news feeds, data from online social networks, me-
trological data, geographical data, etc.
The data structure used to store and analyze data also plays a crucial role in
data analytics. Structured data are stored in the form of rows and column and
use relational databases as a storage platform for processing. In structured
data, the dimensions, format, and type are known in advance and enterprises
have lot of structured data locally stored on the servers. This type of data
includes the data collected from sensors in IoT environments, data collected
from the activity log in web computing, logistic data in the process of sales,
data from the financial and insurance domain, weather data, etc. On the other
side, unstructured data do not follow any specific format but it has a typical
implicit structure. Storage, processing and analysis of these unstructured data
is a big challenge and data scientists have lot of opportunities in this area for
revenue generation. Industry 4.0 and emerging trends such as cloud com-
puting, mobile and wireless communication and online social media are the
key enables for the unstructured data. These data include data from online
social media, phone data, images from satellite, all images and videos from
various use cases. In addition, data governance is another important criterion
for the execution of analytic algorithm to solve real-world business problems.
We also need to define and inculcate the required skills for the efficient ap-
plication of analytics on the underlined data. These skills are listed below.
a. Availability of Tools
There is a diversified scope for applications of tools in data analytics. Application
of these tools varies from the type and other characteristics of data. Series of
experimentations, application of different approaches and tools on data to solve
real-world problem, exploring design issues of various open-source or license
tools are some initial steps required to impart the process of analytics.
b. Language Selection
Due to advancement and transformations in the field of programming lan-
guages, varieties of options are available for programmer and data scientist to
explore. It is important to understand emerging programming languages

(Python, R, Java, C++), allied tools (Linux, Spark, Hadoop), storage services,
their advantages, limitations and their application to underline analytics
problems.
c. Algorithm Selection
Understanding the given analytics problem, its objective and set of questions
to be posted on the dataset to solve problem and selection of appropriate
algorithm are the main steps in analytics. Algorithms for pattern matching
correlation, classification, clustering, detection and identification are few of
the available options for data scientists.
d. Model Selection
For making sense out of big data and drawing meaningful insights, selection of
appropriate model and building it is one of the crucial steps. Recent Application
Program Interfaces such as TensorFlow, Spark enable model building and
training more efficient. Use of correct methodology such as federated learning
[8], relevant libraries, mapping of dataset to the type of algorithm with respect
to design issues plays an important role in obtaining the outcomes.
e. Impact of Probability and Statistics

The main objective of analytics algorithms is to deal with the problems
having uncertain nature and outcome is to predict, forecast, estimate, etc.
These algorithms and their basic implementation is based on the probability
and statistical theory. Analyst must have fundamental knowledge of these
mathematical concepts in order to improve and enhance application devel-
opment in analytics. Regression, Hidden Markov Models are some examples
of algorithms based on these principles [8,9].
f. Data Management
Analyst and data scientist have to understand data across all verticals which
includes data source, data reliability, ownership, etc. End-to-end management
of the underlined data pertaining to the given problem plays an important role
in entire data processing.
g. Data Source
Authenticity and cleanliness of the data source is highly connected to the
success or failure of analytics algorithm. Data cleaning is next important step
which involves the removal of noise, unwanted fields, duplicate values and
missing values. Understanding data and different use cases from pilot to real
production environment helps to gain more insights on the process.
In addition, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [10] proposes
the rules and norms to be taken care particularly when the enterprise or
personal data are being handled for processing and analysis. Data governance
also includes deployment of required security provisions, unauthorized ac-
cess, compromising data, privacy of sensitive data, principle of least privilege
and selective disclosure. The next section elaborates on various issues and
challenges related to the data analytics.
1.3 ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Data analysis and application of learning algorithms is gaining lot of popularity
and global acceptance due to increasing data size. Business processes are also
driven by machine learning techniques for better anticipation in business in-
telligence. All these processes are data intensive and algorithms used to run
resource-constrained mobile and IoT devices. Issues and challenges with data
analytics and application of learning algorithms are as follows:
• Scale
Large number of users, devices and their ubiquitous nature is
transforming the scale of data. IoE, IoT, cloud, artificial in-
telligence and their integration enable large and fast-growing data
across all the verticals. Size and complexity of the data has become
a problem, and old way of processing data doesn’t work effectively
on this big data. The issues related to the big data such as storage,
movement, loading and transforming are now absolute. However
how to explore and analyze this big data and how to process this
data in order to draw meaningful insights are the main issues being
faced by all IT leaders.
• Pace
Real-time analytics, fast pace analytics, commanding and control-
ling the data with high pace are other daunting issues in analytics
and processing. We require customized skills to carry out data
science and high-performance computing platforms as well as
learning-aware platforms to process the data.
• Environment
Complex infrastructure deployed for IoT and IoE, different in-
tegrations platforms and framework for cloud and big data add
more complexity to the environment. Vulnerability analysis [11]

shows that there are more security and privacy requirements for
such complex environments with the features such as alerts man-
agement, real-time monitoring, log tracking, etc. This challenge
also affects the application of appropriate algorithms and techni-
ques for data processing.
• Data Preparation and Training
For application of analytics and cognitive techniques on the data,
data preparation and its training is one of the most important
challenges. The data collection, preparation and labeling is the first
step to be carried out by data scientists or they can also use datasets
from the repositories and use widely accepted tools to prepare and
label it. These options completely depend on the enterprise and the
methodology adapted by the policies of organization. Application
of cognitive and analytics model works in offline and online
modes. In most of the cases these models are offline where initially
prepared data are used to train the model and same model is used
for the different purposes. This mode assumes that the further in-
coming data will be consistent as it was while training the model
initially. However, this ideal situation does not remain constant for
all the use cases and subsequently offline model fails. For more
accurate predictions and forecasting, online models are preferred
where retraining of the data is required. Retraining data is another
important challenge in this process in order to address the pace and
changes in the data.
• Specialized Hardware
In nutshell, analytics, cognitive, machine and deep learning models
are designed and developed to process big data. Implementation
and execution of these models requires high-performance com-
puting platform and specialized hardware. Availability of such
high-end configuration with the processing and storage capabilities
is important bottleneck. Fortunately, due to advancements in
hardware industry, procurement of such facility is becoming af-
fordable. The use and importance of GPU and CUDA for deep
learning and field-programmable gate arrays for machine learning
is gaining more popularity due to commendable results.
• Trust
Trust in communicating with data and communicating data are equally
important from the perspective of developer and end user. In critical
applications such as healthcare, military applications, clinical decision
support systems, construction management in civil engineering trust
on the results produced by different models play a crucial role.
• Transparency
Maintaining transparency during data preparation, training, model
building processing and application of different algorithms is cru-
cial step. Explainable artificial intelligence [12] is one of the im-
portant steps toward maintaining the transparency. Explanation of
the outcomes and results produced by different models creates
more impact and brings more value to the process.
• End-to-End Processing
End-to-end process for commercial applications is highly appre-
ciated by all the stakeholders. End users are more interested to look
at the product as overall process instead of separating the role into
development to deployment to operations. The products are also to
be developed by considering end-to-end processing factor from the
design phase.
1.4 CONCLUSION
This chapter presents the notion of IoT and IoE in the view of big data and
discusses the various factors responsible for increasing data. Different issues
in data analytics and difference between traditional algorithms and analytics
algorithms are presented and discussed in the next part of this chapter.
Different types of analytics with example and skills required for performing
better analysis are also discussed in this part. Finally this chapter concludes
with the various issues and challenges in the analysis process.
REFERENCES
1. Parikshit N., Mahalle and Sheetal S. Sonawane. Foundations of Data Science
Based Healthcare Internet of Things. Springer Singapore, 2021.
2. Kevin Ashton. That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing, RFID Journal, 22 June 2009.
3. Parikshit N., Mahalle and P. N. Railkar. Identity Management for Internet of
Things. River Publishers, Wharton, TX, USA, 2015.
4. Parikshit N., Mahalle. Identity Management Framework for Internet of Things,
PhD Dissertation: Aalborg University, Denmark, 2013.
5. Machine Learning For Dummies®, IBM Limited Edition Published by John
Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com
Copyright © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. P. N. Mahalle, B. Anggorojati, N. R. Prasad and R. Prasad, Identity Driven

Capability Based Access Control (ICAC) Scheme for the Internet of Things,
2012 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Tele-
communications Systems (ANTS), 2012, pp. 49–54.
7. Bengio, Y., Courville, A. and Vincent, P., 2013. Representation Learning: A
Review and New Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence, 35(8), pp. 1798–1828.
8. Khadse, V.M., Mahalle, P.N. and Shinde, G.R., 2020. Statistical Study of
Machine Learning Algorithms Using Parametric and Non-Parametric Tests: A
Comparative Analysis and Recommendations. International Journal of
Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 11(3), pp. 80–105.
9. Machine Learning, Tom Mitchell, McGraw Hill, 1997.
10. The Proposed EU General Data Protection Regulation. A guide for in-house
lawyers, Hunton & Williams LLP, June 2015, p. 14.
11. C. Panchal, V. M. Khadse and P. N. Mahalle, Security Issues in IIoT: A
Comprehensive Survey of Attacks on IIoT and Its Countermeasures, 2018
IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking (GCWCN),
2018, pp. 124–130.
12. Yu-Liang Chou, Catarina Moreira, Peter Bruza, Chun Ouyang, and Joaquim
Jorge. 2021. Counterfactuals and Causability in Explainable Artificial
Intelligence: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. arXiv:cs.AI/2103.0424
Data
Storytelling 2
2.1 OVERVIEW
The main objective of data storytelling is to enable users about understanding
context of the data, learning different approaches to gain insights on the data and
then enabling transformations of these insights into story building and its pre-
sentation. There are different roles in data analytics which include data analyst/
developer/DBA, data scientist/decision scientist and business intelligence de-
veloper. The responsibilities of these specific roles are described below:
1. Data analyst/developer/DBA: Collecting data in various formats,

data cleaning, data formatting and converting underlined data to the
particular formats.
2. Data scientist/decision scientist: Taking these data in a statistical
tool, performing data exploring and data analysis, running statis-
tical models on this processed data and then finally converting
output in the desired formats.
3. Business intelligence developer: Taking above output in the re-
porting tool such as Microstrategy or Tableau, preparing visuali-
zation reports, optimizing these reports and then communicating
reports with the customers.
Data generation is a method of applying preprocessing to data for data pre-

paration and once the data are ready then we apply different techniques and
algorithms to extract knowledge which is used for business intelligence.
Associating context with the data for better insights and performance metrics
finalization for better efficiency are the main objectives of data storytelling.
Consider the digit 57. If the question posted you to answer what is this
digit 57? There will be variations in the responses like it is a number, it is a value.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003307747-2 11
However, unless and until we do not associate context with this number it will
have no meaning. In practice, it can be the roll number of any student, it can
represent the age of person, it can be marks or percentage, it can be price of some
item, it can be the lane number in home address, etc. Association of the context
with 57 has given meaning to it. Initially always the data are raw and association
of the context and processing to these raw data provide information. From this
processed information, the knowledge is extracted which is used for the business
purpose. Knowledge always targets some purpose with the underlined data, and
making this knowledge presentable and communicable to the end user is also
equally important. Visualization plays a vital role by selecting the right graph for
right data and is explained in Chapter 3 of this book. In brief, the important terms
in this process are discussed below and presented in Figure 2.1:
• Data: Present the discrete elements such as words, numbers, codes,

tables, etc.
• Information: Presents the linked elements such as sentences,
paragraphs, concepts, etc.
• Knowledge: Presents the actionable information such as theories,
chapters, stories, etc.
• Wisdom: Presents the applied knowledge such as books, poetry,
philosophies, etc.
In addition to the paradigm presented in Figure 2.1, analytics process follows

few important steps which are listed and explained below:
Data Identification: Data identification for the underlined problem and ana-
lysis of various sources where the required data are available is the first step in
the process. It is also possible that the data available initially is very small and
the provision is also to be made for data expansion to improve the outcomes.
Data Preparation: The next step is to prepare the data for analytics which
includes data cleaning (missing values, inconsistent data and outliers),
FIGURE 2.1 Knowledge Paradigm.

2 • Data Storytelling 13
integration (aggregating/federating data from multiple sources), transforma-

tion (scaling up and down) and reduction (dimensions).
Algorithm/Technique Selection: Selection of an appropriate algorithm for a
given dataset and given problem is another important step. Selection of the al-
gorithm and technique also depends on the business challenge we need to address.
Model Building: Training and retraining of the growing data, deciding the
strategy for model building is the key step in the process.
Evaluation: The next step comprises the evaluation of model for various
performance metrics in order to find optimal and outperforming algorithm.
Deployment: The developed model then needs to be deployed at local storage
or the remote storage and this mode highly depends on the scalability
(numbers of users and devices) of underlined applications.
Analyze: The next step is to analyze the outcomes based on the requirements
and constraints incorporated in training, algorithm and techniques.
Assessment: Assessment is the last step in the process where quality and
validity of the analysis is measured. The information collected after this as-
sessment is then used as a feedback to improve the performance.
Figure 2.2 presents this entire process as cycle:
FIGURE 2.2 Analytics Cycle.

2.2 COMMUNICATING WITH DATA

Communicating with data requires a pool of fundamental necessary skills.
This section elaborates more on these skills and also presents some examples
to demonstrate these skills. Consider the example of credit card service
provider organization that is responsible for providing different types of end-
to-end credit card services to banks, financial organizations, corporate and
individual customers in the varied range. Credit card service provider has
different verticals such as management, issuer, sales, rewards, recovery, legal,
etc. and all these sectors are available with the abundant of data from the past,
and the first important challenge is to communicate with these data for better
business intelligence. In this context, the data available for every sector are
different with different domain parameters. Finding similarities and differ-
ences to draw concepts and reflection for establishing the association helps to
communicate with these data more effectively. Identification of regularities
by applying ‘divide and conquer strategy’ by dividing data into smaller parts/
more meaningful units is also important. Forming category of these data by
inductive process and refining these categories for conceptual understanding,
negative evidences and pattern discovery is also required. These categories
and pattern discovery are subject to change with the growing data and there
should be a provision to accommodate the pace and growth. Grounded theory
[1] is a fundamental approach for conducting qualitative collection and
analysis of the data. It is recommended to follow this approach for analysis of
the dataset based on the requirements.
Faster, business-driven and well-informed recommendations and deci-
sions can be taken with complete awareness about data. This includes audi-
ence identification, business objectives and communicating right message
with the data. It is also important to decide the set of questions we would like
to post on the data, what is the main motivation for performing analysis, etc.
Consider the example of credit card service stated above, if the question
posted on the dataset is
‘Which type of card is preferred more by the customers and why?’.
To formulate the answer to this question, a hypothesis development that fits to

the data and meets to the requirements is important. For example, the credit
card service provider is interested to take a review of sales over last six weeks
and analyze it for the purpose of initiating promotional offers based on some
criteria. These dimensions and measures on the data as well as some filters on
the calculations also contribute to the communicating with data. In the same
example, consider that the review of the sales for a particular type of card and
for a particular type of customers is required. In such cases, the filters on the
dataset can be used to answer this question by associating priorities to certain
fields or attributes. The same example can also be extended where the ana-
lysis is to be carried out only to the customers availing credit card service
since last one year. In the sequel, timeliness is also one of the important
factors for communicating with data. Analysts are recommended to confirm
the set of these components in order to communicate with data more effec-
tively. The outcomes of any analytics and data science project are always
technical and difficult to make them communicable. Data understanding,
interpretation, generating story out of these data and presenting it to the well-
identified audience are the main pillars in communicating with data. Based on
the descriptive statistics, building predictive and prescriptive models with
more justification on the conclusion is the next step of this process.
Explanation of the outcomes and its justification in terms of explainable AI
[2] is becoming more popular particularly in the context of critical applica-
tions such as healthcare, emergency monitoring, etc. The language of data
through data storytelling and designing different graphs to tell a story are two
main parts which are explained below.
• Storytelling
Data storytelling is the essential skill that every data scientist needs to pos-
sess. Understanding business context for data ingestion, understanding end-
user requirement; answering the questions like why, what and how? and
delivering personalized data to individual through visualizations by answering
questions posted on the data are the main steps in data storytelling. The basic
questions before we start on our story are as follows:
1. Who are you writing for?
Whether these are presented to the CEO or Project Manager or the Team lead
of the project or also may be to the customer/user.
2. What are you trying to communicate?
Deciding on what part and features of the data we are interested to present.
3. Why is this important?
Motivation for shaping the story explains why it is so important.

Consider the healthcare use case where the actors are patient and doctor.
During the first visit with doctor, the obvious question posted to patient is
related to the symptoms and statistics regarding physiological parameters,
past medication and past disease history. This phase is referred as a de-
scriptive phase. Based on the analysis of data collected from this phase, then
doctor generally recommends and prescribes some medical test to be carried
out for the purpose of next-level analysis and this phase is referred as diag-
nostic phase. After this descriptive phase (past) and diagnostic phase (pre-
sent), doctor makes some predictions about the occurrence of some
physiological parameters in the future and this phase is referred as predictive
phase. Based on these virtual predictions doctor then converts these virtual
predictions into actionable elements by writing some medicines and tablets to
the patient and this phase is known as a prescriptive phase. This process
clearly tells that based on the timeline analysis of past, present and future,
doctor is able to perform this prescriptive analysis being a domain expert.
These are the four pillars of any data science process irrespective of the
underline application and are depicted in Figure 2.3.
Data storytelling is not the application of data science phases described
above but it also consists of the decision on which type of learning we apply
to build the model, which algorithm from particular learning method is more
appropriate for the data, which tool is more useful for building the stories, etc.
Tools are very important in data storytelling and data science but technique is
everything in the entire process. There should be some library support or
automated intelligent approach which can find out missing values, command
lie approach to clean the data proactively, automate the process of pre-
processing the data, audit the data quality as well as pattern discovery from
the underlined data.
Data storytelling is very important for attending interviews for data
science or whenever you are doing some data science project in any company
because there are many stakeholders to whom you will be actually commu-
nicating and you need to do a lot of analysis for this. A good data story must
be a combination of three main elements which include data, narrative and
visualizations and they must complement each other. The exploratory and
explanatory are the main two states of data storytelling. In exploratory state,
FIGURE 2.3 Data Science Phases.

getting familiar with the data and having insights on the outcomes are the
main tasks. In explanatory state, communicating data to the audience who are
not familiar with your findings is the main task and it can be accomplished
with simplicity, clarity and cohesion. The good data story should contain the
following six main components:
1. Data foundation: Preparing data for storytelling is very important

aspect in storytelling being the main building block. There should
be good amount of qualitative and quantitative data available for
the processing.
2. Main point: Entire data storytelling should have a central idea and
purpose insight for presenting the story to drive change.
3. Explanatory focus: Knowing your audience is very important in
the storytelling part. Audience should be able to interpret the data
based on the methods and motivation. Audience also should be able
to address and understand why and how of the data story.
4. Linear sequence: Data story must have a linear sequence for un-
derstanding of the patterns in the data as well as storytelling part.
5. Dramatic elements: The presence of a dramatic element in the
data story makes story more convincing.
6. Visual anchor: Visual effects and presentation help audience to
see trends, patterns and anomalies in the data more easily and it
also helps for tailoring our presentation.
• Data Visualization
Data visualization include presenting our data using visual components such as
graphs, charts which are generated from the dataset available in different forms
such as spreadsheet, tables, comma-separated values, etc. Communicating the
substance of data and their metrics in the data is the main focus of visualization
to provide clear context of the data, holding attention to the key insights of data,
and in turn, leading to certain useful actions. Essentially, good data visualiza-
tion must address the following eight main points.
1. Communicating with data: The language of data for clear un-

derstanding and effective communication is very important. In
addition to this, the context of the data and purpose should be very
clear for effective visualization.
2. Good and bad data visualizations: Factors responsible for
making good visualizations and reasons for making bad visuali-
zations needs a detailed thought process before preparing the
visualizations.
3. Communicating visually: Visual perception which includes order,

hierarchy, clarity, relationship, convention and visual design cre-
ates more impact on the better visualizations.
4. The right graph for the right data: Available component for
visualization in the underlined tool or framework, category of the
data and right graph for the right data create more impact on the
visualization. Deadly sins of graph, avoiding being misled by data
are some of the important points to be taken care of.
5. Designing graph to tell a story: Clearing clutters from the vi-
sualizations and bringing out the story with different colors play a
vital role in data storytelling with visualization.
6. Craft an impactful data narrative: Analytics value chain, data
narratives, turning visualizations into actual story are important
points for crafting impactful narratives.
7. Bringing it all together: Finally what is your main point and
objective, picking your right visualization, editing it for clarity if
required, formatting it for more impact, formatting it for narrative
are few main steps for bringing it all together in nutshell.
2.3 STORYTELLING CONTEXT

Context association with the data and storytelling is applicable to end-to-end
process from data to outcome and the main questions to be addressed are
presented and discussed below.
1. How did this initiative come about?

The main goal, objectives and the purpose of entire initiative should be ad-
dressed through this question during the process.
2. What would you consider a successful answer?

During storytelling, many questions are posted on the data and the main ob-
jective is to find answers of these questions through analytics. The performance
matrix needs to be defined for considering answer as a successful answer.
3. Do you have any suspicions about the data?

Suspicions about data, any concerns regarding the source, nature, type, etc.
should be raised before we start the process.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
most amazing judgments pronounced on them by critics whose
judgment on other subjects is excellent.[19] The reason of this tardy
recognition of Dostoievsky in his own country is that he was one of
those men whose innate sense of fairness and hatred of cant
prevent them from whole-heartedly joining a political party and
swallowing its tenets indiscriminately, even when some of these
tenets are nonsensical and iniquitous. He was one of those men who
put truth and love higher than any political cause, and can fight for
such a cause only when the leaders of it, in practice as well as in
theory, never deviate from the one or the other. He was between two
fires: the Government considered him a revolutionary, and the
revolutionaries thought him a retrograde; because he refused to be
blind to the merits of the Government, such as they were, and
equally refused to be blind to the defects of the enemies of the
Government. He therefore attacked not only the Government, but the
Government’s enemies; and when he attacked, it was with
thunderbolts. The Liberals never forgave him this. Dostoievsky was
unjustly condemned to spend four years in penal servitude for a
political crime; for having taken part in a revolutionary propaganda.
He returned from Siberia a Slavophil, and, I will not say a
Conservative, as the word is misleading; but a man convinced not
only of the futility of revolution, but also of the worthlessness of a
great part of the revolutionaries. Nor did the Liberals ever forgive him
this. They are only just beginning to do so now. Moreover, in one of
his most powerful books, The Possessed, he draws a scathing
picture of all the flotsam and jetsam of revolution, and not only of the
worthless hangers-on who are the parasites of any such movement,
but he reveals the decadence and worthlessness of some of the
men, who by their dominating character played leading parts and
were popular heroes. Still less did the Liberals forgive him this book;
and even now, few Liberal writers are fair towards it. Again,
Dostoievsky was, as I shall show later, by nature an antagonist of
Socialism and a hater of materialism; and since all the leading men
among the Liberals of his time were either one or the other, if not
both, Dostoievsky aroused the enmity of the whole Liberal camp, by
attacking not only its parasites but its leaders, men of high principle
such as Bielinsky, who were obviously sincere and deserving of the
highest consideration and respect. One can imagine a similar
situation in England if at the present time there were an autocratic
government, a backward and ignorant peasantry, and a small and
Liberal movement carried on by a minority of extremely intellectual
men, headed, let us say, by Mr. Bernard Shaw, Lord Morley,
Professor Raleigh, and Sir J. J. Thomson. I purposely take men of
widely different opinions, because in a country where there is a fight
going on for a definite thing, such as a Constitution, there is a
moment when men, who under another régime would be split up into
Liberals and Conservatives, are necessarily grouped together in one
big Liberal camp. Now, let us suppose that the men who were
carrying on this propaganda for reform were undergoing great
sacrifices; let us likewise suppose them to be Socialists and
materialists to the core. Then suppose there should appear a
novelist of conspicuous power, such as George Meredith or Mr.
Thomas Hardy or Mr. H. G. Wells, who by some error was sent to
Botany Bay for having been supposed to be mixed up with a
revolutionary propaganda, and on his return announced that he was
an Anti-Revolutionary, violently attacked Mr. Shaw, wrote a book in
which he caricatured him, and drew a scathing portrait of all his
disciples,—especially of the less intelligent among them. One can
imagine how unpopular such an author would be in Liberal circles.
This was the case of Dostoievsky in Russia. It is only fair to add that
his genius has now obtained full recognition, even at the hands of
Liberals, though they still may not be able to tolerate his book, The
Possessed. But considering the magnitude of his genius, this
recognition has been, on the whole, a tardy one. For instance, even
in so valuable a book as Prince Kropotkin’s Ideals and Realities in
Russian Literature, Dostoievsky receives inadequate treatment and
scanty appreciation. On the other hand, in Merejkowsky’s Tolstoy
and Dostoievsky, Merejkowsky, who is also a Liberal, praises
Dostoievsky with complete comprehension and with brilliance of
thought and expression.
II
Dostoievsky’s Life
Dostoievsky was the son of a staff-surgeon and a tradesman’s
daughter. He was born in a charity hospital, the “Maison de Dieu,” at
Moscow, in 1821. He was, as he said, a member of a stray family.
His father and five children lived in a flat consisting of two rooms and
a kitchen. The nursery of the two boys, Michael and Fedor, consisted
of a small part of the entrance hall, which was partitioned off. His
family belonged to the lowest ranks of the nobility, to that stratum of
society which supplied the bureaucracy with its minor public
servants. The poverty surrounding his earliest years was to last until
the day of his death.
Some people are, as far as money is concerned, like a negative
pole—money seems to fly away from them, or rather, when it comes
to them, to be unable to find any substance it can cleave to.
Dostoievsky was one of these people; he never knew how much
money he had, and when he had any, however little, he gave it away.
He was what the French call a panier percé: money went through
him as through a sieve. And however much money he had, it was
never he but his friends who benefited by it.
He received his earliest education at a small school in Moscow,
where a schoolmaster who taught Russian inspired him and his
brother with a love of literature, of Pushkin’s poetry and other writers,
introduced him also to the works of Walter Scott, and took him to see
a performance of Schiller’s Robbers. When his preliminary studies
were ended, he was sent with his brother to a school of military
engineers at St. Petersburg. Here his interest in literature, which had
been first aroused by coming into contact with Walter Scott’s works,
was further developed by his discovery of Balzac, George Sand, and
Homer. Dostoievsky developed a passionate love of literature and
poetry. His favourite author was Gogol. He left this school in 1843 at
the age of twenty-three, with the rank of sub-lieutenant.
His first success in literature was his novel, Poor Folk (published in
1846), which he possibly began to write while he was still at school.
He sent this work to a review and awaited the result, utterly hopeless
of its being accepted. One day, at four o’clock in the morning, just
when Dostoievsky was despairing of success and thinking of suicide,
Nekrasov the poet, and Grigorovitch the critic, came to him and said:
“Do you understand yourself what you have written? To have written
such a book you must have possessed the direct inspiration of an
artist.”
This, said Dostoievsky, was the happiest moment of his life. The
book was published in Nekrasov’s newspaper, and was highly
praised on all sides. He thus at once made a name in literature. But
as though Fate wished to lose no time in proving to him that his life
would be a series of unending struggles, his second story, The
Double, was a failure, and his friends turned from him, feeling that
they had made a mistake. From that time onward, his literary career
was a desperate battle, not only with poverty but also with public
opinion, and with political as well as with literary critics.
Dostoievsky suffered all his life from epilepsy. It has been said that
this disease was brought on by his imprisonment. This is not true:
the complaint began in his childhood, and one of his biographers
gives a hint of its origin: “It dates back,” he writes, “to his earliest
youth, and is connected with a tragic event in their family life.” This
sentence affords us an ominous glimpse into the early years of
Dostoievsky, for it must indeed have been a tragic event which
caused him to suffer from epileptic fits throughout his life.
In 1849 came the most important event in Dostoievsky’s life. From
1840 to 1847 there was in St. Petersburg a group of young men who
met together to read and discuss the Liberal writers such as Fourier,
Louis Blanc and Prudhon. Towards 1847 these circles widened, and
included officers and journalists: they formed a club under the
leadership of Petrachevsky, a former student, the author of a
Dictionary of Foreign Terms. The club consisted, on the one hand, of
certain men, followers of the Decembrists of 1825, who aimed at the
emancipation of the serfs and the establishment of a Liberal
Constitution; and, on the other hand, of men who were predecessors
of the Nihilists, and who looked forward to a social revolution. The
special function of Dostoievsky in this club was to preach the
Slavophil doctrine, according to which Russia, sociologically
speaking, needed no Western models, because in her workmen’s
guilds and her system of mutual reciprocity for the payment of taxes,
she already possessed the means of realising a superior form of
social organisation.
The meetings of this club took place shortly after the revolutionary
movement which convulsed Western Europe in 1848. The Emperor
Nicholas, who was a strong-minded and a just although a hard man,
imbued with a religious conviction that he was appointed by God to
save the crumbling world, was dreaming of the emancipation of the
serfs, and by a fatal misunderstanding was led to strike at men
whose only crime was that they shared his own aims and ideals.
One evening at a meeting of this club, Dostoievsky had declaimed
Pushkin’s Ode on the Abolition of Serfdom, when some one present
expressed a doubt of the possibility of obtaining this reform except
by insurrectionary means. Dostoievsky is said to have replied: “Then
insurrection let it be!” On the 23rd of April 1849, at five o’clock in the
morning, thirty-four suspected men were arrested. The two brothers
Dostoievsky were among them. They were imprisoned in a citadel,
where they remained for eight months. On the 22nd of December,
Dostoievsky was conducted, with twenty-one others, to the public
square, where a scaffold had been erected. The other prisoners had
been released. While they were taking their places on the scaffold,
Dostoievsky communicated the idea of a book which he wished to
write to Prince Monbelli, one of his fellow-prisoners, who related the
incident later. There were, that day, 21 degrees of frost (Réaumur);
the prisoners were stripped to their shirts, and had to listen to their
sentence; the reading lasted over twenty minutes: the sentence was
that they were to be shot. Dostoievsky could not believe in the reality
of the event. He said to one of his comrades: “Is it possible that we
are going to be executed?” The friend of whom he asked the
question pointed to a cart laden with objects which, under the
tarpaulin that covered them, looked like coffins. The Registrar
walked down from the scaffold; the Priest mounted it, taking the
cross with him, and bade the condemned men make their last
confession. Only one man, of the shopkeeper class, did so: the
others contented themselves with kissing the cross. Dostoievsky
thus relates the close of the scene in a letter to his brother:
“They snapped swords above our heads, they made us put on the
long white shirts worn by persons condemned to death. We were
bound in parties of three to stakes to suffer execution. Being third in
the row, I concluded that I had only a few minutes to live. I thought of
you and your dear ones, and I managed to kiss Pleshtcheev and
Dourov, who were next to me, and to bid them farewell.”
The officer in charge had already commanded his firing party to
load; the soldiers were already preparing to take aim, when a white
handkerchief was waved in front of them. They lowered their guns,
and Dostoievsky and the other twenty-one learned that the Emperor
had cancelled the sentence of the military tribunal, and commuted
the sentence of death to one of hard labour for four years. The carts
really contained convict uniforms, which the prisoners had to put on
at once, and they started then and there for Siberia. When the
prisoners were unbound, one of them, Grigoriev, had lost his reason.
Dostoievsky, on the other hand, afterwards affirmed that this episode
was his salvation; and never, either on account of this or of his
subsequent imprisonment, did he ever feel or express anything save
gratitude. “If this catastrophe had not occurred,” said Dostoievsky,
alluding to his sentence, his reprieve and his subsequent
imprisonment, “I should have gone mad.” The moments passed by
him in the expectation of immediate death had an ineffaceable effect
upon his entire after-life. They shifted his angle of vision with regard
to the whole world. He knew something that no man could know who
had not been through such moments. He constantly alludes to the
episode in his novels, and in The Idiot he describes it thus, through
the mouth of the principal character:
“I will tell you of my meeting last year with a certain man; this man
was connected with a strange circumstance, strange because it is a
very unusual one. He was once led, together with others, on to the
scaffold, and a sentence was read out which told him that he was to
be shot for a political crime. He spent the interval between the
sentence and the reprieve, which lasted twenty minutes, or at least a
quarter of an hour, with the certain conviction that in a few minutes
he should die. I was very anxious to hear how he would recall his
impressions. He remembered everything with extraordinary
clearness, and said that he would never forget a single one of those
minutes. Twenty paces from the scaffold round which the crowd and
the soldiers stood, three stakes were driven into the ground, there
being several prisoners. The first three were led to the stakes and
bound, and the white dress of the condemned was put on them. This
consisted of a long white shirt, and over their eyes white bandages
were bound so that they should not see the guns. Then in front of
each stake a firing party was drawn up. My friend was No. 8, so he
went to the stake in the third batch. A priest carried the cross to each
of them. My friend calculated that he had five minutes more to live,
not more. He said that these five minutes seemed to him an endless
period, infinitely precious. In these five minutes it seemed to him that
he would have so many lives to live that he need not yet begin to
think about his last moment, and in his mind he made certain
arrangements. He calculated the time it would take him to say good-
bye to his comrades; for this he allotted two minutes. He assigned
two more minutes to think one last time of himself, and to look round
for the last time. He remembered distinctly that he made these three
plans, and that he divided his time in this way. He was to die, aged
twenty-seven, healthy and strong, after having said good-bye to his
companions. He remembered that he asked one of them a
somewhat irrelevant question, and was much interested in the
answer. Then, after he had said good-bye to his comrades, came the
two minutes which he had set aside for thinking of himself. He knew
beforehand of what he would think: he wished to represent to himself
as quickly and as clearly as possible how this could be: that now he
was breathing and living, and that in three minutes he would already
be something else, some one or something, but what? and where?
All this he felt he could decide in those two minutes. Not far away
was the church, and the cathedral with its gilded dome was glittering
in the sunshine. He remembered that he looked at the dome with
terrible persistence, and on its glittering rays. He could not tear his
gaze away from the rays. It seemed to him somehow that these rays
were his new nature, and that in three minutes he would be made
one with them. The uncertainty and the horror of the unknown, which
was so near, were terrible. But he said that during this time there
was nothing worse than the unceasing thought: ‘What if I do not die?
What if life were restored to me now? What an eternity! And all this
would be mine. I would in that case make every minute into a
century, lose nothing, calculate every moment, and not spend any
atom of the time fruitlessly.’ He said that this thought at last made
him so angry that he wished that they would shoot him at once.”
Dostoievsky’s sentence consisted of four years’ hard labour in the
convict settlement in Siberia, and this ordeal was doubtless the most
precious boon which Providence could have bestowed on him. When
he started for prison he said to A. Milioukov, as he wished him good-
bye: “The convicts are not wild beasts, but men probably better, and
perhaps much worthier, than myself. During these last months (the
months of his confinement in prison) I have gone through a great
deal, but I shall be able to write about what I shall see and
experience in the future.” It was during the time he spent in prison
that Dostoievsky really found himself. To share the hard labour of the
prisoners, to break up old ships, to carry loads of bricks, to sweep up
heaps of snow, strengthened him in body and calmed his nerves,
while the contact with murderers and criminals and prisoners of all
kinds, whose inmost nature he was able to reach, gave him a
priceless opportunity of developing the qualities which were
especially his own both as a writer and as a man.
With the criminals he was not in the position of a teacher, but of a
disciple; he learnt from them, and in his life with them he grew
physically stronger, and found faith, certitude and peace.
At the end of the four years (in 1853) he was set free and returned
to ordinary life, strengthened in body and better balanced in mind.
He had still three years to serve in a regiment as a private soldier,
and after this period of service three years more to spend in Siberia.
In 1859 he crossed the frontier and came back to Russia, and was
allowed to live first at Tver and then at St. Petersburg. He brought a
wife with him, the widow of one of his former colleagues in the
Petrachevsky conspiracy, whom he had loved and married in
Siberia. Until 1865 he worked at journalism.
Dostoievsky’s nature was alien to Socialism, and he loathed the
moral materialism of his Socialistic contemporaries. Petrachevsky
repelled him because he was an atheist and laughed at all belief;
and the attitude of Bielinsky towards religion, which was one of
flippant contempt, awoke in Dostoievsky a passion of hatred which
blazed up whenever he thought of the man. Dostoievsky thus
became a martyr, and was within an ace of losing his life for the
revolutionary cause; a movement in which he had never taken part,
and in which he disbelieved all his life.
Dostoievsky returned from prison just at the time of the
emancipation of the serfs, and the trials which awaited him on his
release were severer than those which he endured during his
captivity. In January 1861 he started a newspaper called the
Vremya. The venture was a success. But just as he thought that
Fortune was smiling upon him, and that freedom from want was
drawing near, the newspaper, by an extraordinary misunderstanding,
was prohibited by the censorship for an article on Polish affairs. This
blow, like his condemnation to death, was due to a casual blunder in
the official machinery. After considerable efforts, in 1864 he started
another newspaper called the Epocha. This newspaper incurred the
wrath, not of the Government censorship, but of the Liberals; and it
was now that his peculiar situation, namely, that of a man between
two fires, became evident. The Liberals abused him in every kind of
manner, went so far as to hint that the Epocha and its staff were
Government spies, and declared that Dostoievsky was a scribbler
with whom the police should deal. At this same time his brother
Michael, his best friend Grigoriev, who was on the staff of his
newspaper, and his first wife, Marie, died one after another.
Dostoievsky was now left all alone; he felt that his whole life was
broken, and that he had nothing to live for. His brother’s family was
left without resources of any kind. He tried to support them by
carrying on the publication of the Epocha, and worked day and night
at this, being the sole editor, reading all the proofs, dealing with the
authors and the censorship, revising articles, procuring money,
sitting up till six in the morning, and sleeping only five out of the
twenty-four hours. But this second paper came to grief in 1865, and
Dostoievsky was forced to own himself temporarily insolvent. He had
incurred heavy liabilities, not only to the subscribers of the
newspaper, but in addition a sum of £1400 in bills and £700 in debts
of honour. He writes to a friend at this period: “I would gladly go back
to prison if only to pay off my debts and to feel myself free once
more.”
A publishing bookseller, Stellovsky, a notorious rascal, threatened
to have him taken up for debt. He had to choose between the
debtors’ prison and flight: he chose the latter, and escaped abroad,
where he spent four years of inexpressible misery, in the last
extremity of want.
His Crime and Punishment was published in 1866, and this book
brought him fame and popularity; yet in spite of this, on an occasion
in 1869, he was obliged to pawn his overcoat and his last shirt in
order with difficulty to obtain two thalers.
During all this time his attacks of epilepsy continued. He was
constantly in trouble with his publishers, and bound and hampered
by all sorts of contracts. He writes at this epoch: “In spite of all this I
feel as if I were only just beginning to live. It is curious, isn’t it? I have
the vitality of a cat.” And on another occasion he talks of his stubborn
and inexhaustible vitality. He also says through the mouth of one of
his characters, Dimitri Karamazov, “I can bear anything, any
suffering, if I can only keep on saying to myself: ‘I live; I am in a
thousand torments, but I live! I am on the pillory, but I exist! I see the
sun, or I do not see the sun, but I know that it is there. And to know
that there is a sun is enough.’”
It was during these four years, overwhelmed by domestic calamity,
perpetually harassed by creditors, attacked by the authorities on the
one hand and the Liberals on the other, misunderstood by his
readers, poor, almost starving, and never well, that he composed his
three great masterpieces: Crime and Punishment in 1866, The Idiot
in 1868, and The Possessed in 1871-2; besides planning The
Brothers Karamazov. He had married a second time, in 1867. He
returned to Russia in July 1871: his second exile was over. His
popularity had increased, and the success of his books enabled him
to free himself from debt. He became a journalist once more, and in
1873 edited Prince Meschtcherki’s newspaper, The Grazjdanin. In
1876 he started a monthly review called The Diary of a Writer, which
sometimes appeared once a month and sometimes less often. The
appearance of the last number coincided with his death. This review
was a kind of encyclopædia, in which Dostoievsky wrote all his
social, literary and political ideas, related any stray anecdotes,
recollections and experiences which occurred to him, and
commented on the political and literary topics of the day. He never
ceased fighting his adversaries in this review; and during this time he
began his last book, The Brothers Karamazov, which was never
finished. In all his articles he preached his Slavophil creed, and on
one occasion he made the whole of Russia listen to him and applaud
him as one man. This was on June 8, 1880, when he made a speech
at Moscow in memory of Pushkin, and aroused to frenzy the
enthusiasm even of those men whose political ideals were the exact
opposite of his own. He made people forget they were “Slavophils”
or “Westernisers,” and remember only one thing—that they were
Russians.
In the latter half of 1880, when he was working on The Brothers
Karamazov, Strakhov records: “He was unusually thin and
exhausted; his body had become so frail that the first slight blow
might destroy it. His mental activity was untiring, although work had
grown very difficult for him. In the beginning of 1881 he fell ill with a
severe attack of emphysema, the result of catarrh in the lung. On
January 28 he had hæmorrhage from the throat. Feeling the
approach of death, he wished to confess and to receive the Blessed
Sacrament. He gave the New Testament used by him in prison to his
wife to read aloud. The first passage chanced to be Matthew iii. 14:
“But John held Him back and said, ‘It is I that should be baptized by
Thee, and dost Thou come to me?’ And Jesus answered and said
unto him, ‘Detain Me not; for thus it behoves us to fulfil a great
truth.’”
When his wife had read this, Dostoievsky said: “You hear: Do not
detain me. That means that I am to die.” And he closed the book. A
few hours later he did actually die, instantaneously, from the rupture
of an artery in the lungs.
This was on the 28th of January 1881; on the 30th he was buried
in St. Petersburg. His death and his funeral had about them an
almost mythical greatness, and his funeral is the most striking
comment on the nature of the feeling which the Russian public had
for him both as a writer and as a man. On the day after his death, St.
Petersburg witnessed a most extraordinary sight: the little house in
which he had lived suddenly became for the moment the moral
centre of Russia. Russia understood that with the death of this
struggling and disease-stricken novelist, she had lost something
inestimably precious, rare and irreplaceable. Spontaneously, and
without any organised preparation, the most imposing and
triumphant funeral ceremony was given to Dostoievsky’s remains;
and this funeral was not only the greatest and most inspiring which
had ever taken place in Russia, but as far as its inward significance
was concerned there can hardly ever have been a greater one in the
world. Other great writers and other great men have been buried
with more gorgeous pomp and with a braver show of outward
display, but never, when such a man has been followed to the grave
by a mourning multitude, have the trophies and tributes of grief been
so real; for striking as they were by their quantity and their nature,
they seemed but a feeble and slender evidence of the sorrow and
the love to which they bore witness. There were deputations bearing
countless wreaths, there were numerous choirs singing religious
chants, there were thousands of people following in a slow stream
along the streets of St. Petersburg, there were men and women of
every class, but mostly poor people, shabbily dressed, of the lower
middle or the lower classes. The dream of Dostoievsky, that the
whole of Russia should be united by a bond of fraternity and
brotherly love, seemed to be realised when this crowd of men,
composed of such various and widely differing elements, met
together in common grief by his grave. Dostoievsky had lived the life
of a pauper, and of a man who had to fight with all his strength in
order to win his daily bread. He had been assailed by disease and
hunted by misfortune; his whole life seemed to have rushed by
before he had had time to sit down quietly and write the great ideas
which were seething in his mind. Everything he had written seemed
to have been written by chance, haphazardly, to have been jotted
down against time, between wind and water. But in spite of this, in
his work, however incomplete, however fragmentary and full of faults
it may have been, there was a voice speaking, a particular message
being delivered, which was different from that of other writers, and at
times more precious. While it was there, the public took it for
granted, like the sun; and it was only when Dostoievsky died that the
hugeness of the gap made by his death, caused them to feel how
great was the place he had occupied both in their hearts and in their
minds. It was only when he died that they recognised how great a
man he was, and how warmly they admired and loved him.
Everybody felt this from the highest to the lowest. Tolstoy, in writing
of Dostoievsky’s death, says: “I never saw the man, and never had
any direct relations with him, yet suddenly when he died I
understood that he was the nearest and dearest and most necessary
of men to me. Everything that he did was of the kind that the more
he did of it the better I felt it was for men. And all at once I read that
he is dead, and a prop has fallen from me.” This is what the whole of
Russia felt, that a support had fallen from them; and this is what they
expressed when they gave to Dostoievsky a funeral such as no king
nor Captain has ever had, a funeral whose very shabbiness was
greater than any splendour, and whose trophies and emblems were
the grief of a nation and the tears of thousands of hearts united
together in the admiration and love of a man whom each one of them
regarded as his brother.
III
Dostoievsky’s Character
Such, briefly, are the main facts of Dostoievsky’s crowded life.
Unlike Tolstoy, who has himself told us in every conceivable way
everything down to the most intimate detail which is to be known
about himself, Dostoievsky told us little of himself, and all that we
know about him is gathered from other people or from his letters;
and even now we know comparatively little about his life. He disliked
talking about himself; he could not bear to be pitied. He was modest,
and shielded his feelings with a lofty shame. Strakhov writes about
him thus:
“In Dostoievsky you could never detect the slightest bitterness or
hardness resulting from the sufferings he had undergone, and there
was never in him a hint of posing as a martyr. He behaved as if there
had been nothing extraordinary in his past. He never represented
himself as disillusioned, or as not having an equable mind; but, on
the contrary, he appeared cheerful and alert, when his health
allowed him to do so. I remember that a lady coming for the first time
to Michael Dostoievsky’s (his brother’s) evenings at the newspaper
office, looked long at Dostoievsky, and finally said: ‘As I look at you it
seems to me that I see in your face the sufferings which you have
endured.’ These words visibly annoyed Dostoievsky. ‘What
sufferings?’ he said, and began to joke on indifferent matters.”
Long after his imprisonment and exile, when some friends of his
tried to prove to him that his exile had been a brutal act of injustice,
he said: “The Socialists are the result of the followers of
Petrachevsky. Petrachevsky’s disciples sowed many seeds.” And
when he was asked whether such men deserved to be exiled, he
answered: “Our exile was just; the people would have condemned
us.”
The main characteristics of his nature were generosity, catholicity,
vehement passion, and a “sweet reasonableness.” Once when he
was living with Riesenkampf, a German doctor, he was found living
on bread and milk; and even for that he was in debt at a little milk
shop. This same doctor says that Dostoievsky was “one of those
men to live with whom is good for every one, but who are
themselves in perpetual want.” He was mercilessly robbed, but he
would never blame any one who took advantage of his kindness and
his trustfulness. One of his biographers tells us that his life with
Riesenkampf proved expensive to him, because no poor man who
came to see the doctor went away without having received
something from Dostoievsky. One cannot read a page of his books
without being aware of the “sweet reasonableness” of his nature.
This pervaded his writings with fragrance like some precious balm,
and is made manifest to us in the touching simplicity of some of his
characters, such as the Idiot and Alexis Karamazov, to read of whom
is like being with some warm and comforting influence, something
sweet and sensible and infinitely human. His catholicity consists in
an almost boundless power of appreciation, an appreciation of
things, persons and books widely removed from himself by accidents
of time, space, class, nationality and character. Dostoievsky is
equally able to appreciate the very essence of a performance got up
by convicts in his prison, and the innermost beauty of the plays of
Racine. This last point is singular and remarkable. He was universal
and cosmopolitan in his admiration of the literature of foreign
countries; and he was cosmopolitan, not because he wished to cut
himself away from Russian traditions and to become European and
Westernised, but because he was profoundly Russian, and had the
peculiarly Russian plastic and receptive power of understanding and
assimilating things widely different from himself.
When he was a young man, Shakespeare and Schiller were well
known, and it was the fashion to admire them. It was equally the
fashion to despise the French writers of the seventeenth century. But
Dostoievsky was just as enthusiastic in his admiration of Racine and
Corneille and all the great classics of the seventeenth century. Thus
he writes: “But Phèdre, brother! You will be the Lord knows what if
you say this is not the highest and purest nature and poetry; the
outline of it is Shakespearian, but the statue is in plaster, not in
marble.” And again of Corneille: “Have you read The Cid? Read it,
you wretch, read it, and go down in the dust before Corneille!”
Dostoievsky was constantly “going down in the dust” before the
great masterpieces, not only of his own, but of other countries, which
bears out the saying that “La valeur morale de l’homme est en
proportion de sa faculté d’admirer.”
Dostoievsky never theorised as to how alms should be given, or
as to how charity should be organised. He gave what he had, simply
and naturally, to those who he saw had need of it; and he had a right
to this knowledge, for he himself had received alms in prison. Neither
did he ever theorise as to whether a man should leave the work
which he was fitted by Providence to do (such as writing books), in
order to plough fields and to cut down trees. He had practised hard
labour, not as a theoretic amateur, but as a constrained professional.
He had carried heavy loads of bricks and broken up ships and swept
up heaps of snow, not out of philosophy or theory, but because he
had been obliged to do so; because if he had not done so he would
have been severely punished. All that Tolstoy dreamed of and aimed
at, which was serious in theory but not serious in practice, that is to
say, giving up his property, becoming one with the people, ploughing
the fields, was a reality to Dostoievsky when he was in prison. He
knew that hard labour is only real when it is a necessity, when you
cannot leave off doing it when you want to; he had experienced this
kind of hard labour for four years, and during his whole life he had to
work for his daily bread. The result of this is that he made no
theories about what work a man should do, but simply did as well as
he could the work he had to do. In the words of a ballade written by
Mr. Chesterton, he might have said:
“We eat the cheese,—you scraped about the rind,
You lopped the tree—we eat the fruit instead.
You were benevolent, but we were kind,
You know the laws of food, but we were fed.”
And this is the great difference between Dostoievsky and Tolstoy.
Tolstoy was benevolent, but Dostoievsky was kind. Tolstoy theorised
on the distribution of food, but Dostoievsky was fed and received
alms like a beggar. Dostoievsky, so far from despising the calling of
an author, or thinking that it was an occupation “thin sown with aught
of profit or delight” for the human race, loved literature passionately.
He was proud of his profession: he was a great man of letters as well
as a great author. “I have never sold,” he wrote, “one of my books
without getting the price down beforehand. I am a literary proletarian.
If anybody wants my work he must ensure me by prepayment.”
There is something which resembles Dr. Johnson in the way he
talks of his profession and his attitude towards it. But there is,
nevertheless, in the phrase just quoted, something bitterly ironical
when one reflects that he was a poor man all his life and incessantly
harassed by creditors, and that he derived almost nothing from the
great popularity and sale of his books.
“Dostoievsky,” writes Strakov, “loved literature; he took her as she
was, with all her conditions; he never stood apart from literature, and
he never looked down upon her. This absence of the least hint of
literary snobbishness is in him a beautiful and touching
characteristic. Russian literature was the one lodestar of
Dostoievsky’s life, and he cherished for it a passionate love and
devotion. He knew very well that when he entered the lists he would
have to go into the public market-place, and he was never ashamed
of his trade nor of his fellow-workers. On the contrary, he was proud
of his profession, and considered it a great and sacred one.”
He speaks of himself as a literary hack: he writes at so much a
line, three and a half printed pages of a newspaper in two days and
two nights. “Often,” he says, “it happened in my literary career that
the beginning of the chapter of a novel or story was already set up,
and the end was still in my mind and had to be written by the next
day.” Again: “Work from want and for money has crushed and
devoured me. Will my poverty ever cease? Ah, if I had money, then I
should be free!”
I have said that one of the main elements of Dostoievsky’s
character was vehement passion. There was more than a vehement
element of passion in Dostoievsky; he was not only passionate in his
loves and passionate in his hates, but his passion was unbridled. In
this he resembles the people of the Renaissance. There were
perilous depths in his personality; black pools of passion; a seething
whirlpool that sent up every now and then great eddies of boiling
surge; yet this passion has nothing about it which is undefinably evil;
it never smells of the pit. The reason of this is that although
Dostoievsky’s soul descended into hell, it was purged by the flames,
and no poisonous fumes ever came from it. There was something of
St. Francis in him, and something of Velasquez. Dostoievsky was a
violent hater. I have already told how he hated Bielinsky, the
Socialists and the materialists whom he attacked all his life, but
against Tourgeniev he nourished a blind and causeless hatred. This
manifests itself as soon as he leaves prison, in the following
outburst: “I know very well,” he writes, “that I write worse than
Tourgeniev, but not so very much worse, and after all I hope one day
to write quite as well as he does. Why, with my crying wants, do I
receive only 100 roubles a sheet, and Tourgeniev, who possesses
two thousand serfs, receives 400 roubles? Owing to my poverty I am
obliged to hurry, to write for money, and consequently to spoil my
work.” In a postscript he says that he sends Katkov, the great
Moscow editor, fifteen sheets at 100 roubles a sheet, that is, 1500
roubles in all. “I have had 500 roubles from him, and besides, when I
had sent three-quarters of the novel, I asked him for 200 to help me
along, or 700 altogether. I shall reach Tver without a farthing. But, on
the other hand, I shall shortly receive from Katkov seven or eight
hundred roubles.”
It must not be forgotten that the whole nature of Dostoievsky, both
as man and artist, was profoundly modified by the disease from
which he suffered all his life, his epilepsy. He had therefore two
handicaps against him: disease and poverty. But it is his epilepsy
which was probably the cause of his dislikes, his hatreds and his
outbreaks of violent passion. The attacks of epilepsy came upon him
about once a month, and sometimes, though not often, they were
more frequent. He once had two in a week. His friend Strakov
describes one of them thus: “I once saw one of his ordinary attacks:
it was, I fancy, in 1863, just before Easter. Late in the evening, about
eleven o’clock, he came to see me, and we had a very animated
conversation. I cannot remember the subject, but I know that it was
important and abstruse. He became excited, and walked about the
room while I sat at the table. He said something fine and jubilant. I
confirmed his opinion by some remark, and he turned to me a face
which positively glowed with the most transcendent inspiration. He
paused for a moment, as if searching for words, and had already
opened his lips to speak. I looked at him all expectant for fresh
revelation. Suddenly from his open mouth issued a strange,
prolonged, and inarticulate moan. He sank senseless on the floor in
the middle of the room.”
The ancients called this “the sacred sickness.” Just before the
attacks, Dostoievsky felt a kind of rapture, something like what
people say they feel when they hear very great music, a perfect
harmony between himself and the world, a sensation as if he had
reached the edge of a planet, and were falling off it into infinite
space. And this feeling was such that for some seconds of the
rapture, he said, you might give ten years of your life, or even the
whole of it. But after the attack his condition was dreadful, and he
could hardly sustain the state of low-spirited dreariness and
sensitiveness into which he was plunged. He felt like a criminal, and
fancied there hung over him an invisible guilt, a great transgression.
He compares both sensations, suddenly combined and blended in a
flash, to the famous falling pitcher of Mahomet, which had not time to
empty itself while the Prophet on Allah’s steed was girdling heaven
and hell. It is no doubt the presence of this disease and the
frequency of the attacks, which were responsible for the want of
balance in his nature and in his artistic conceptions, just as his
grinding poverty and the merciless conditions of his existence are
responsible for the want of finish in his style. But Dostoievsky had
the qualities of his defects, and it is perhaps owing to his very illness,
and to its extraordinary nature, that he was able so deeply to
penetrate into the human soul. It is as if the veil of flesh and blood
dividing the soul from that which is behind all things, was finer and
more transparent in Dostoievsky than in other men: by his very
illness he may have been able to discern what is invisible to others.
It is certainly owing to the combined poverty and disease which
made up his life, that he had such an unexampled insight into the
lives and hearts of the humble, the rejected, the despised, the
afflicted, and the oppressed. He sounded the utmost depths of
human misery, he lived face to face with the lowest representatives
of human misfortune and disgrace, and he was neither dispirited nor
dismayed. He came to the conclusion that it was all for the best, and
like Job in dust and ashes consented to the eternal scheme. And
though all his life he was one of the conquered, he never ceased
fighting, and never for one moment believed that life was not worth
living. On the contrary, he blessed life and made others bless it.
His life was “a long disease,” rendered harder to bear and more
difficult by exceptionally cruel circumstances. In spite of this,
Dostoievsky was a happy man: he was happy and he was cheerful;
and he was happy not because he was a saint, but because, in spite
of all his faults, he radiated goodness; because his immense heart
overflowed in kindness, and having suffered much himself, he
understood the sufferings of others; thus although his books are
terrible, and deal with the darkest clouds which can overshadow the
human spirit, the descent into hell of the human soul, yet the main
impression left by them is not one of gloom but one of comfort.
Dostoievsky is, above all things, a healer and a comforter, and this is
because the whole of his teaching, his morality, his art, his character,
are based on the simple foundation of what the Russians call
“dolgoterpjenie,” that is, forbearance, and “smirenie,” that is to say,
resignation. In the whole history of the world’s literature there is no
literary man’s life which was so arduous and so hard; but
Dostoievsky never complained, nor, we can be sure, would he have
wished his life to have been otherwise. His life was a martyrdom, but
he enjoyed it. Although no one more nearly than he bears witness to
Heine’s saying that “where a great spirit is, there is Golgotha,” yet we
can say without hesitation that Dostoievsky was a happy man, and
he was happy because he never thought about himself, and
because, consciously or unconsciously, he relieved and comforted
the sufferings of others. And his books continued to do so long after
he ceased to live.
All this can be summed up in one word: the value of Dostoievsky’s
life. And the whole reason that his books, although they deal with the
tragedies of mankind, bring comfort to the reader instead of gloom,
hope instead of despair, is, firstly, that Dostoievsky was an altruist,
and that he fulfilled the most difficult precept of Christianity—to love
others better than oneself; and, secondly, that in leading us down in
the lowest depths of tragedy, he shows us that where man ends,
God takes up the tale.
IV
Poor Folk and the Letters from a Dead House
In his first book, Poor Folk, which was published in 1846, we have
the germ of all Dostoievsky’s talent and genius. It is true that he
accomplished far greater things, but never anything more
characteristic. It is the story of a poor official, a minor clerk in a
Government office, already aged and worn with cares, who battles
against material want. In his sombre and monotonous life there is a

(Download PDF) Data Storytelling and Visualization With Tableau A Hands On Approach 1St Edition Prachi Manoj Joshi Ebook Online Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

(Download PDF) Data Storytelling and Visualization With Tableau A Hands On Approach 1St Edition Prachi Manoj Joshi Ebook Online Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(Download PDF) Data Storytelling and Visualization With Tableau A Hands On Approach 1St Edition Prachi Manoj Joshi Ebook Online Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Data Storytelling and Visualization with

Tableau: A Hands-on Approach 1st

Hands-On Data Visualization: Interactive Storytelling

Data Analytics and Visualization in Quality Analysis

AWS IoT With Edge ML and Cybersecurity: A Hands-On

AWS IoT With Edge ML and Cybersecurity: A Hands-On

Data Visualization: Exploring and Explaining with Data

Data Visualization with Python and JavaScript 2nd

Data Visualization with Python and JavaScript, 2nd

Beginning PyQt: A Hands-on Approach to GUI Programming

DATA STORYTELLING AND

Prachi Manoj Joshi

• Provides a hands-on approach in Tableau in a simplified manner

Prachi Manoj Joshi and

4 Visualization with Tableau 49

4.5 Interactive Dashboard 69

The main characteristics of this book are as follows:

• Provides a hands-on approach in Tableau in a simplified manner

Prachi Manoj Joshi

Dr. Parikshit Narendra Mahalle is a senior member of the IEEE and

Editorial Review Board for the International Journal of Ambient Computing

1.2 BIG DATA, PROPERTIES AND

• Volume: Deals with extremely complex and large volumes of data

TABLE 1.1 Traditional Algorithm vs Analytics Algorithms

Business decisions are generally made on dynamic and constantly vo-

explore. It is important to understand emerging programming languages

e. Impact of Probability and Statistics

1.3 ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

more complexity to the environment. Vulnerability analysis [11]

6. P. N. Mahalle, B. Anggorojati, N. R. Prasad and R. Prasad, Identity Driven

1. Data analyst/developer/DBA: Collecting data in various formats,

Data generation is a method of applying preprocessing to data for data pre-

• Data: Present the discrete elements such as words, numbers, codes,

In addition to the paradigm presented in Figure 2.1, analytics process follows

FIGURE 2.1 Knowledge Paradigm.

integration (aggregating/federating data from multiple sources), transforma-

FIGURE 2.2 Analytics Cycle.

2.2 COMMUNICATING WITH DATA

‘Which type of card is preferred more by the customers and why?’.

To formulate the answer to this question, a hypothesis development that fits to

1. Who are you writing for?

2. What are you trying to communicate?

3. Why is this important?

Motivation for shaping the story explains why it is so important.

FIGURE 2.3 Data Science Phases.

1. Data foundation: Preparing data for storytelling is very important

1. Communicating with data: The language of data for clear un-

3. Communicating visually: Visual perception which includes order,

2.3 STORYTELLING CONTEXT

1. How did this initiative come about?

2. What would you consider a successful answer?

3. Do you have any suspicions about the data?

You might also like