Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) A History of Regional Commercial Television in Australia Michael Thurlow Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) A History of Regional Commercial Television in Australia Michael Thurlow Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/music-for-prime-time-a-history-of-
american-television-themes-and-scoring-jon-burlingame/
https://ebookmass.com/product/samurai-a-concise-history-michael-
wert/
https://ebookmass.com/product/screening-twentieth-century-europe-
television-history-memory-ib-bondebjerg/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-tunis-crusade-
of-1270-a-mediterranean-history-michael-lower/
A Useful History of Britain: The Politics of Getting
Things Done 1st Edition Michael Braddick
https://ebookmass.com/product/a-useful-history-of-britain-the-
politics-of-getting-things-done-1st-edition-michael-braddick/
https://ebookmass.com/product/rethinking-horror-in-the-new-
economies-of-television-stella-marie-gaynor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-business-in-
australia-before-world-shaping-a-multinational-economy-simon-
ville/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-world-regional-
geography/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-history-of-sketch-comedy-a-
journey-through-the-art-and-craft-of-humor-keegan-michael-key/
A History of Regional
Commercial Television
in Australia
Michael Thurlow
A History of Regional Commercial Television
in Australia
Fig. i BTV Ballarat, main studio, 1962. Copyright Wolfgang Sievers. Image
courtesy of National Library of Australia (3309233)
Michael Thurlow
A History of Regional
Commercial Television
in Australia
Michael Thurlow
Sydney, NSW, Australia
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
Key
a
AMV was assigned a Victoria callsign, as its station (i.e. transmitter) was located in that state. The studio
was located across the border, in Albury, NSW. This was, at that time, unique in Australian television.
AMV was, in early marketing, referred to as the “two-state station”
ix
x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1 Introduction 1
xi
xii CONTENTS
12 Conclusion433
Appendices443
Bibliography447
Index467
Abbreviations
xiii
xiv ABBREVIATIONS
xvii
xviii List of Figures
xix
List of Boxes
xxi
xxii List of Boxes
Introduction
We got our local news from the Gilgandra Weekly. Our state, national and
international news came from 2DU and ABC radio and the Sunday newspa-
pers [from Sydney]. The only real glimpses beyond our own district were
the Friday and Saturday night pictures and Movietone newsreels at the
Western Monarch Theatre. [Television] brought the world to our doorstep
for the first time.15
broadcasting “connects you to the place where you live … [it] frames the
conversation in a community”.21
In this context it is useful to consider the meaning of the term “regional”
as it applies to this study. In granting commercial television licences, the
Menzies Liberal-Country Party Coalition government made a clear dis-
tinction between the six “metropolitan” state capital cities of Sydney,
Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, and Hobart, and all other parts of
Australia. For the purposes of brevity, “regional” is used throughout this
book in place of similarly imprecise terms such as “rural”, “country”, and
“provincial”, which permeate official records pertaining to Australia’s
non-metropolitan areas. This includes the territorial capitals of Canberra
and Darwin which were regarded as “provincial” for the purpose of grant-
ing the first commercial television licences. The primary exception to this
schema is the term “remote”, which is used to reference the sparsely popu-
lated regions of central Australia when discussing the introduction of sat-
ellite broadcasting in the 1980s.22
Today, regional communities across Australia have access to three free-
to-air commercial television services and their numerous sub-channels, as
well as the ABC, Special Broadcasting Service (SBS), pay television, and an
ever-increasing array of subscription-based streaming services, including
Amazon Prime, Netflix, and Stan. By late 2022, Australia’s 54 regional
commercial television station licences were controlled by Seven West
Media Ltd (“Seven”; 9 licences), WIN Corporation P/L (“WIN”; 16
licences), Southern Cross Media Group Ltd (“Southern Cross”; 14
licences), Nine Entertainment Co. Ltd (“Nine”; 2 licences), Imparja
Television P/L (“Imparja”; 1 licence), and various joint ventures between
these five entities (12 licences). These regional networks are, in turn, vari-
ously affiliated with each of the three metropolitan networks for program
supply purposes. What remains of “local” production is highly centralised
and mostly confined to the provision of local news.
Examining the factors which have driven this decades-long shift is
important for several reasons. Firstly, it offers a logical starting point for
understanding the political, regulatory, economic, technological, indus-
trial, and social history of a key sector in the Australian media. This history
is undoubtedly linked, in part, to that of the metropolitan networks.
However, as Liz Jacka points out, there is a danger that acceptance of the
(albeit dominant) metropolitan commercial television history as the his-
tory of commercial television can lead to “a generalisation of patterns
6 M. THURLOW
which may be true for one as if they were universal”.23 Similarly, Mark
McKenna explains that while national histories have been prominent, we
need to consider the specificities of place, particularly when telling the
story of regional Australia. Furthermore, McKenna believes we might bet-
ter understand the “national” by focusing on the “local”.24 In this context,
we can view the history of television in Australia—both in terms of what
has been “gained” and what has been “lost”—differently, by adopting a
regional perspective.25
Secondly, it affords an opportunity to record something of life outside
Australia’s capital cities. As Kate Darian-Smith points out, non-urban
Australia has undoubtedly been given less attention than it deserves in
historical scholarship.26 The diminishing status of regional commercial
television has reflected broader declines in the financial and social prosper-
ity of many regional communities amidst increased globalisation of agri-
cultural markets, economic rationalism, metro-centrism, and urban drift.27
The seemingly ever-present themes of isolation, abandonment, and
neglect, while a long-held feature of life in non-urban Australia, have
undoubtedly been amplified in recent times with the withdrawal of gov-
ernment, health, banking, and other services.
Thirdly, it provides a historical backdrop against which to critically
examine the Turnbull government’s 2017 changes to media ownership
rules. These have already triggered significant structural changes in
Australia’s media, including American broadcaster CBS’ acquisition of
Network Ten later that same year and Nine Entertainment’s 2018 pur-
chase of Fairfax Media.28 Further ownership changes are likely in coming
years as regional media companies, in particular, continue to lobby gov-
ernment for additional legislative change, including a relaxation of regula-
tions which prevent a single entity controlling radio, television, and
newspapers, as well as mergers between commercial television companies
operating in the same market. Such highly political developments when,
rather than if, successful would represent the final stage in the absolute
and irrevocable merging of regional and metropolitan commercial televi-
sion interests which, as we will see, began more than six decades earlier.
The story of regional commercial television has, at various times, proven
to be as dramatic, comedic, entertaining, and intriguing as the programs
in its schedules. The aggregation of regional commercial television ser-
vices in the late 1980s was rocked by Bruce Gordon’s last-minute acquisi-
tion of DDQ Darling Downs and his affiliation agreement with the Nine
Network. This manoeuvre was at the detriment of Telecasters North
1 INTRODUCTION 7
Queensland Ltd which, with Nine as its largest shareholder, had reason-
ably expected to carry that network’s programs. Instead, the company was
forced to sign a program supply deal with the third-rated Ten Network. In
2016, Nine dumped WIN as its primary regional affiliate across regional
Australia after forging an affiliation agreement with Southern Cross; this
was reversed five years later. In 2021, Seven West Media, owner of the
Seven Network, assumed control of its primary regional affiliate after
acquiring the television assets of Prime Media Group. This transaction,
discussed further in Chap. 11, is significant for several reasons, not least
because it achieved, in a way first envisaged by Sir Frank Packer and others
in the 1950s, the absolute and irrevocable merger of metropolitan and
regional commercial television interests.
These changes are but the latest in a long list of developments which
stretch back more than 60 years. Yet paradoxically, for an industry which
frequently trades on telling others’ stories, its own has never been told.
This begs the question of why a history of regional commercial television
has not previously been attempted. One reason, as suggested by Helen
Wheatley, might be that the ephemeral and transient nature of the
medium—evidenced in GLV’s first-night glitch—places it “beyond a his-
torical materiality”.29 Another could be that the nature of the industry—
where practitioners must have one eye on the present and the other on the
future—leaves little or no time for reflection on the past.30 Yet another
could be that those within the industry are simply too close to appreciate
the value of its history. When I contacted a former (and extremely well-
known) journalist who began her career in regional television, she ques-
tioned, somewhat dismissively, how this topic was sufficiently complex and
significant to have maintained my interest over many years. In contrast,
metropolitan television has attracted somewhat more attention. The mini-
misation and marginalisation of regional history does little to dispel the
long-held perception by country people that metropolitan elites place lit-
tle if any value on anything that happens beyond Sydney and Melbourne.
Australia’s Great Dividing Range has long been as much a cultural phe-
nomenon as it is a geographical feature.
My own interest in the story of regional commercial television has
resulted from direct involvement in the industry. As a schoolboy in the
pre-aggregation years of the 1970s and 1980s, I recall having a choice of
just one commercial television station and the ABC. My local station,
CWN Central Western Slopes (Dubbo, NSW) was, as discussed in Chap.
4, a direct relay of CBN Central Tablelands (Orange, NSW). The latter
8 M. THURLOW
This history has been organised into five parts and 12 chapters which
represent the key phases in regional commercial television development.
Chapter 1, “Introduction”, outlines the rationale for, and approach to,
writing a history of regional commercial television in Australia. Based on
fine-grained empirical research, each chapter recovers and explores signifi-
cant developments in the sector’s history. Particular attention is given to
the operational, technical, financial, program, production, and ownership
aspects of regional commercial television stations.
Part I: Establishment focuses on the formation of Australia’s radio
broadcasting and television systems to the 1960s. Chapter 2 traces the
power and politics which accompanied the introduction of wireless teleg-
raphy and radio, the public debates and Royal Commission on Television,
and the Menzies Coalition government’s introduction of a dual television
system of public and commercial stations in the early 1950s. Chapter 3
explores the monopolies and manoeuvres associated with establishing the
first 13 regional commercial television stations controlled by local radio
broadcasting and newspaper interests in the early 1960s. This created a
sector which was at its most local and independent during these first years
of operation.
Part II: Expansion details the extension of commercial television to
other parts of regional Australia in the 1960s and 1970s. Chapter 4 probes
the dualities and downturns which shaped the establishment of a further
17 regional commercial stations in the late 1960s. Chapter 5 reviews the
colour and contrasts of commercial television in the years immediately
before and after the introduction of colour television. The extension of
television to a further five areas in the remotest parts of regional Australia
is also discussed. These developments brought the first significant decreases
in both localism and independence.
Part III: Maturation documents the evolution of regional commercial
television between the mid-1970s and mid-1980s. Chapter 6 considers
the prosperity and promise in the years following the introduction of
colour including the effect of the Fraser government’s decision to intro-
duce a domestic communications satellite. Chapter 7 looks at the security
and status which accompanied governmental signals towards localism in
the early 1980s. These years were notable for a slowing of recent declines
in independence as well as the most significant increases in localism since
the early 1960s.
Part IV: Equalisation charts the politically motivated efforts to
increase the number of television services in regional areas between 1986
12 M. THURLOW
Notes
1. Hartigan, quoted in SMH, 28/10/2019, p. 24.
2. https://www.nfsa.gov.au/latest/television-c omes-r egional-a ustralia,
accessed 1/2/2015.
3. Stone (2014, p. 199).
4. Cryle et al. (2010, pp. 47–57); ABCB, pp. 78–79.
5. Potts (2009).
6. Blainey (1966).
7. Shoesmith (1994, p. 1).
8. Anderson (1983, pp. 1–7).
9. Scannell (1996).
10. Thompson (1967, pp. 56–97).
11. Larkin (2004, pp. 289–314).
12. Hanson (2012, pp. 110–131).
1 INTRODUCTION 13
13. Walker (2018, pp. 71–83). See The Picture Show Man (1977) for a drama-
tised account of travelling picture shows in regional Australia in the 1920s.
14. Christison (2009).
15. Lorraine Thurlow, telephone conversation with Michael Thurlow,
3/11/2019.
16. Shoesmith and Edmonds (2003, p. 1).
17. Shoesmith and Edmonds (2003, p. 205).
18. https://www.anzca.net/conferences/past-conferences/2015-conf/p2.
html, accessed 23/1/2018.
19. Shoesmith and Edmonds (2003, p. 212). John Reith was the first Managing
Director of the British Broadcasting Company (1922) and the first
Director-General of the British Broadcasting Corporation (1927).
20. TQL, 1977.
21. https://www.poynter.org/reporting-e diting/2015/why-d oes-l ocal-
matter-lets-ask-our-audience/, accessed 17/7/2015.
22. See Aveyard (2012 and 2015) for a discussion of “regional” within the
context of cinema exhibition and film consumption in Australian and the
United Kingdom.
23. Jacka (2004, p. 31).
24. McKenna (2002, p. 6).
25. McKenna (2016, p. xvi).
26. Darian-Smith (2002, pp. 90–99).
27. Falk (2001, p. 3).
28. Business Insider, 28/8/2017; ABC News, 26/7/2018.
29. Wheatley (2007, p. 3).
30. Bingham (2015, p. 19).
31. Herd (2012).
32. Andren (2003).
Bibliography
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread
of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983), pp. 1-7.
Andren, Peter. The Andren Report: An Independent Way in Australian Politics
(Melbourne: Scribe, 2003).
Aveyard, Karina. ‘Rural Cinema: Film Exhibition and Consumption in Australia
and the United Kingdom’, PhD thesis, Griffith University, 2012.
Aveyard, Karina. Lure of the Big Screen (Bristol: Intellect, 2015).
Bingham, Adrian. ‘Media Products as Historical Artefacts’, Martin Conboy and
John Steel (eds.) The Routledge Companion to British Media History (London
and New York: Routledge, 2015), p. 19.
14 M. THURLOW
This is, they say, “a struggle which has always been biased towards the
former”.6 Ronald Mendelsohn, as cited above, observed this dynamic in
Herald and Weekly Times Ltd (HWT) and its radio operations as “an
octopus in the air”.39 On 23 October 1935, partly in response to the
growing influence of the HWT and AWA (reportedly controlling 24 sta-
tions between them),40 the United Australia Party (UAP)-Country Party
coalition government headed by Prime Minister Joseph Lyons introduced
regulations to limit control by a single interest to five radio stations nation-
ally.41 The Federation of Australian Radio Broadcasters (FARB), which
had been formed in 1930 as the main industry body,42 railed against “gov-
ernment by regulation” and claimed the policy would “flat-iron” com-
mercial stations. In November 1935, after strong backbench support for
major commercial interests, the government legislated that a maximum of
eight—rather than five—broadcasting stations could be owned by a single
interest.43 Bridget Griffen-Foley suggests that Keith Murdoch, who had
earlier endorsed Lyons’ defection from Labor and his formation of the
United Australia Party (UAP), had likely used his influence for a more
favourable outcome. The Lyons UAP/Country Party coalition’s regula-
tions were the first to limit media ownership and control. But its decision
to legislate for a limit of eight—rather than five—stations, demonstrates
the ability of powerful commercial interests to find favour at the highest
levels of government.