Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advances in Parasitology Volume 117 David Rollinson 2 Full Chapter PDF
Advances in Parasitology Volume 117 David Rollinson 2 Full Chapter PDF
David Rollinson
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-parasitology-volume-117-david-rollinson-
2/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-parasitology-
volume-117-david-rollinson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-parasitology-
volume-115-russell-stothard/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-ophthalmology-and-
optometry-2022-volume-7-1-advances-volume-7-1-myron-yanoff-md-
editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-ophthalmology-and-
optometry-2021-volume-6-1-advances-volume-6-1-myron-yanoff-md-
editor/
Advances in Economic Measurement: A Volume in Honour of
D. S. Prasada Rao Duangkamon Chotikapanich
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-economic-measurement-a-
volume-in-honour-of-d-s-prasada-rao-duangkamon-chotikapanich/
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-studies-in-political-
philosophy-volume-7-david-sobel/
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-studies-in-political-
philosophy-volume-4-david-sobel/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-cosmetic-surgery-
volume-2-2019-2019-edition-edition-gregory-h-branham/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-protein-chemistry-and-
structural-biology-volume-115-dna-repair-rossen-donev/
Advances in Parasitology, 117
FIRST EDITION
David Rollinson
Life Sciences Department The Natural History Museum, London, United
Kingdom
Russell Stothard
Department of Tropical Disease Biology Liverpool School of Tropical
Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Table of Contents
Cover image
Title page
Copyright
Contributors
Abstract
1: Introduction
7: Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
Abstract
6: Concluding remarks
References
Abstract
1: Introduction
2: Trypanothione metabolism
References
Copyright
Contributors
Chapter One: The microscopic five of the big five:
Managing zoonotic diseases within and beyond
African wildlife protected areas
Anya V. Tobera,⁎; Danny Govenderb,c; Isa-Rita M. Russoa,†; Jo Cablea,† a School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff,
Wales, United Kingdom
b SANParks, Scientific Services, Savanna and Grassland Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
c Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa
† Authors contributed equally to this work
⁎ Corresponding author: email address: tobera@cardiff.ac.uk.
Abstract
African protected areas strive to conserve the continent's great biodiversity with a targeted focus on
the flagship ‘Big Five’ megafauna. Though often not considered, this biodiversity protection also
extends to the lesser-known microbes and parasites that are maintained in these diverse
ecosystems, often in a silent and endemically stable state. Climate and anthropogenic change, and
associated diversity loss, however, are altering these dynamics leading to shifts in ecological
interactions and pathogen spill over into new niches and hosts. As many African protected areas
are bordered by game and livestock farms, as well as villages, they provide an ideal study system to
assess infection dynamics at the human-livestock-wildlife interface. Here we review five zoonotic,
multi-host diseases (bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, Rift Valley fever, schistosomiasis and
cryptosporidiosis)—the ‘Microscopic Five’—and discuss the biotic and abiotic drivers of parasite
transmission using the iconic Kruger National Park, South Africa, as a case study. We identify
knowledge gaps regarding the impact of the ‘Microscopic Five’ on wildlife within parks and
highlight the need for more empirical data, particularly for neglected (schistosomiasis) and newly
emerging (cryptosporidiosis) diseases, as well as zoonotic disease risk from the rising bush meat
trade and game farm industry. As protected areas strive to become further embedded in the socio-
economic systems that surround them, providing benefits to local communities, One Health
approaches can help maintain the ecological integrity of ecosystems, while protecting local
communities and economies from the negative impacts of disease.
Keywords
Emerging Infectious Diseases; One Health; Zoonoses; Spill over; Spill Back; Kruger National Park
1: Introduction
As we enter the sixth mass extinction, protecting the world's biodiversity has never been more critical.
Protected areas, including national parks, cover over 18.8 million km2 and are at the forefront of a global
effort to safeguard biodiversity (Chape et al., 2003). Managers of these protected areas must strike a
balance between protecting the ecological integrity of ecosystems and preventing exploitation of local
resources while promoting their use in education and recreation (Chape et al., 2003). If managed
correctly, protected areas can be beneficial to wildlife conservation and the country's economy through
promoting ecotourism and creating local employment opportunities (Cheung, 2012; Spies et al., 2018).
However, the management of protected areas is challenging, particularly in the Anthropocene era of
human mediated global change, and increased emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases
(reviewed by Cable et al., 2017). These diseases can reduce fitness, alter wildlife population
structure/size and even alter ecosystem function (Holdo et al., 2009; Prins and Weyerhaeuser, 1987;
Scott, 1988). Therefore, to effectively manage wildlife populations and ecosystems, it is essential to
understand the threats posed by pathogens and the diseases they cause.
Of the 3881 terrestrial and marine national parks in the world, almost half are in sub-Saharan Africa,
with terrestrial parks here covering 1 million km2 (4% of the total land area; Chape et al., 2003;
Muhumuza and Balkwill, 2013). These parks aim to conserve Africa's unique and iconic ecosystems
ranging from open savannas and grasslands to dense forest. This variety of habitats supports high levels
of biodiversity, drawing numerous tourists who aspire to spot the ‘Big Five’ megafauna: African buffalo
(hereafter referred to as buffalo), lion, African elephant (hereafter referred to as elephant), rhinoceros
and leopard (Dube and Nhamo, 2019). However, hidden and often forgotten biodiversity within
protected areas includes pathogens, which modulate animal abundance, fitness and behaviour (Gómez
and Nichols, 2013). It is crucial to better understand drivers for past and current wildlife disease
outbreaks within protected areas, to find new approaches to predict and prevent future outbreaks. A
review of all infectious wildlife diseases within protected areas would be too large a task. Instead, we
focus on five diseases referred to here as the ‘Microscopic Five’, which are important at the human-
livestock-wildlife interface due to their broad host range and zoonotic potential. These interface diseases
would all benefit from a ‘One Health’ approach to management (Fawzy and Helmy, 2019; Innes et al.,
2020; Webster et al., 2016). We therefore purposefully included high profile diseases (bovine tuberculosis
(BTb), Rift Valley fever and brucellosis) as well as neglected diseases (cryptosporidiosis and
schistosomiasis) for study. Using Kruger National Park, one of the most researched parks in Africa (van
Wilgen et al., 2016), we will review the key factors that can influence outbreaks and transmission of the
‘Microscopic Five’ within and around protected areas (Fig. 1). By focusing on a select group of
pathogens within a specific park our intention is to highlight drivers of disease common among many
protected areas and the importance of considering all infectious diseases in wildlife management plans.
We will first give a brief introduction to the ‘Microscopic Five’ and then give examples of the
environmental and anthropogenic factors driving the dynamics of these diseases within and around
Kruger National Park. We will then discuss the key knowledge gaps and future challenges for managing
the ‘Microscopic Five’ and other important diseases and touch on different management approaches
followed in various parks.
FIG. 1 The ‘Big Five’ and ‘Microscopic Five’, and the drivers of disease at the wildlife-
livestock-human interface. Arrows represent anthropogenic drivers from beyond
Kruger National Park. Created with Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2109) and Adobe Photoshop (2021).
Some diseases of large herbivores within Kruger National Park which may pose a threat to livesto
Spatial
Transmission Transmission
Disease. Pathogen Drivers distribution
modes routes
in KNP
Bacteria
Anthrax Bacillus Vector, Ingestion of Calcium soil Northern
anthracis environme contamina content, and
ntal, direct ted drought central
contact, vegetation regions
fomites or
carcasses
Bovine Tb Micobacteria Aerosol Respiratory Wildlife/livestock South,
bovis tract interface, host central,
density moving
north
Virus
Foot and mouth Aphtovirus Aerosol, Respiratory Wildlife/livestock North,
fomites tract interface, host central,
density south
African horse Orbivirus Mosquito Cutaneous Introduced Central
sickness vector, penetratio horses,
direct n season
contact
Rift Valley fever Phlebovirus Mosquito Cutaneous Climate change, Higher in
vector, penetratio drought, south
direct n rainfall and
contact central
regions
Protozoa
Bovine Brucella abortus Direct contact Ingestion of Host density North,
brucellosis infected central,
discharges south
during
birth,
milk,
mucus
membrane
s
Cryptosporidiosis Cryptosporidium Environmental Faecal-oral Dependant on Unknown
spp. via species and
contamina host range
tion of
food and
water
Spatial
Transmission Transmission
Disease. Pathogen Drivers distribution
modes routes
in KNP
Piroplasma
Corridor disease Theileria parva Tick vector Cutaneous Wildlife/livestock North,
penetratio interface central,
n south
Babesiosis Babesia spp. Tick vector Cutaneous Unknown
penetratio
n
Digenea
Fascioliasis Fasciola spp. Environmental Contact with Dependant on Unknown
infected species and
water host range
Schistosomiasis Schistsoma spp. Environmental Contact with Dependant on Unknown
infected species and
water host range
2.3: Brucellosis
Brucellosis, caused by bacteria of the Brucella genus, is ranked among the most economically important
zoonotic diseases globally. Although it is an OIE notifiable disease, outbreaks are thought to be greatly
under-reported in Africa (McDermott et al., 2013). The species of medical and veterinary importance are
Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and B. suis (see Ducrotoy et al., 2017). Infection in humans can lead to
a debilitating illness known as ‘Mediterranean’ or ‘undulant’ fever and is commonly misdiagnosed as
malaria (Ducrotoy et al., 2017; Godfroid et al., 2011). Human infection occurs through direct contact
with or consumption of an infected animal. Consumption of un-pasteurised milk causes most human
infections, while human to human transmission is rare (Godfroid, 2018). Several wildlife species have
been reported as seropositive for this disease and African buffalo are thought to be a reservoir for B.
abortus (see Godfroid et al., 2013). Infection can cause abortions in livestock reducing farm productivity,
however the effects of the disease on wildlife are largely unknown and may differ between species
(Gorsich et al., 2015). Vaccines are available for livestock and small ruminants but not yet for humans
(Ducrotoy et al., 2017).
2.4: Cryptosporidiosis
Cryptosporidiosis, caused by several species of the protozoan Cryptosporidium genus, can lead to severe
diarrhoea in humans and animals globally. Infectious diarrhoea is a major cause of death in children
under five in Africa and Cryptosporidium is second only to rotavirus as a contributor to this disease
(Kotloff et al., 2013; Squire and Ryan, 2017). Transmission occurs through the faecal oral route via close
contact with infected humans, animals or contaminated food and water (Innes et al., 2020). Currently
there are at least 40 recognised species with varying host specificities but the most important two
species infecting humans and livestock are C. hominus and C. parvum. The latter is the predominant
cause of diarrhoea in young calves and is the most important zoonotic species. Cryptosporidium parvum
is more genetically diverse than C. hominus with several subtypes with differing host specificities,
therefore an integrated genotyping approach has been advocated to differentiate these subtypes (Innes
et al., 2020). Cryptosporidium species have been identified in a range of wildlife, yet most studies focus on
humans and livestock (Zahedi et al., 2016). C. parvum, C. ubiquitum and C. bovis were recently identified
in wildlife within Kruger National Park in elephant (Loxodonta africana), buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and
impala (Aepyceros melampus; see Samra et al., 2011). Oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. have also been
detected in zebra (Equus zebra), buffalo and wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) faeces in Mikumi National
Park, Tanzania (Mtambo et al., 1997). There is currently no available vaccine for cryptosporidiosis yet
there is potential to develop one for cattle (Innes et al., 2020).
2.5: Schistosomiasis
Schistosomiasis is a waterborne, zoonotic disease of veterinary and medical importance, caused by
digenean parasites of the genus Schistosoma. Schistosomiasis is a major public health threat with an
estimated 207 million people infected and 779 million people at risk globally, with 90% of these
infections in Africa (Steinmann et al., 2006). Like all digeneans, schistosomes have an indirect lifecycle.
They require an intermediate freshwater snail host within which they reproduce asexually ultimately
producing cercariae, which are free-swimming larval stages that subsequently infect a definitive
mammalian host (Cribb et al., 2003). Definitive animal or human hosts can become infected with
schistosomiasis by entering infested waters—the water-borne larvae burrow through the skin of the new
host (Cribb et al., 2003). There are at least 12 known schistosome species in Africa of which 5 are known
to infect humans (S. haematobium, Schistosoma mansoni, S. intercalatum, S. guineensis and S. mattheei).
Schistosoma mattheei is of note as although predominantly a parasite of cattle, it has also been found in
wildlife and humans where it is known to hybridise with S. haematobium (see Pitchford, 1961). The other
species infect a wide range of domestic and wild animals including cattle, horses, buffalo, baboons,
zebra, hippopotamus and rodents (Standley et al., 2012). Traditionally, malacological monitoring
programmes have only targeted snail species known to harbour human infecting schistosomes, but a
wider approach is clearly needed as we become aware of wider host ranges (Pennance et al., 2021) that
are likely to shift with increasing environmental stressors. There is currently no vaccine for
schistosomiasis and the main control strategy for humans is preventative chemotherapy, improved
water, sanitation and hygiene and snail control (WHO, 2022).
Table 2
Surveillance herd One off survey used by state officials to determine the prevalence of BTb within an
programme area or by a stock owner conducting a self-assessment
Maintenance To join this programme, herds are required to undergo two consecutive tests with
herd 100% negative results at least 3 months apart. These BTb free herds are then
programme tested every 2 years. If an individual tests positive, then the entire herd is
moved to the infected herd programme
Infected herd Compulsory programme for herds that have tested positive with the CIT test, as
programme well as those detected from meat and milk inspection, post-mortems or clinical
cases. These herds are placed under quarantine and kept under supervision of
a state veterinarian, who will order the slaughter of infected animals. The rest
of the herd is tested every 3 months and is only let out of quarantine once the
herd has undergone two consecutive negative tests
Diagnostic Individual cattle destined to be imported or exported. Imported cattle are kept in
testing quarantine and must undergo a compulsory CIT test. Before export, cattle
programme must also receive a comparative CIT test—a requirement for many importing
(individuals) countries
3.2: Control in wildlife
The control of BTb in wildlife is becoming increasingly important as many farms switch from livestock
to game farming, and wild buffalo reservoirs hinder control efforts in cattle (Michel et al., 2019). Bovine
Tb has been identified in 21 different wildlife species in South Africa, including most recently giraffe
(Hlokwe et al., 2019). The current control scheme is focused on domestic cattle and although some tests
have been adjusted for use in buffalo, this is not the case for other wildlife species. The Buffalo
Veterinary Procedural Notice (VPN) was published in 2017 outlining the procedures for disease testing,
movement and contingency planning for disease outbreaks in buffalo (DAFF, 2017). The buffalo VPN
states that for movement purposes, buffalo must have a negative CIT test as outlined in the manual for
cattle. Importantly, the interpretation of CIT has been based on cattle thresholds due to the lack of
species-specific cut-off values for African buffaloes. The gamma interferon test is also an effective
diagnostic tool for buffalo but is not approved by DAFF for movement purposes. There is currently no
guidance on control of BTb in other wildlife species and there are limited verified diagnostic tests in
these species (DAFF, 2017).
Kruger National Park and Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park are the only two parks within South Africa that
contain buffalo herds maintaining BTb yet they have adopted different control approaches. Bovine Tb
was first detected in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park in 1986 and a test and cull disease programme was
initiated in 1999. This programme involved a mobile capture unit to corral buffalo in different areas of
the park, test them by means of the CIT test and culling positive individuals. Between 1991 and 2006,
4733 buffalo were tested, with herd prevalence ranging from 2.3% to 54.7%. Subsequent, data analysis
suggested that the programme was effective at reducing BTb prevalence, particularly in areas with
intensive test and culling operations (Le Roex et al., 2016). Kruger National Park took a different
approach to managing BTb in its buffalo population after the disease was detected in this host species in
1990. They aimed to breed disease free buffalo from Foot and Mouth Disease infected parents within the
park in order to conserve the genetic pool of Kruger buffalo in an ex-situ population (Laubscher and
Hoffman, 2012). This approach, which used dairy cows as foster parents for buffalo calves initially, and
later switched to having the buffalo mothers rear their young, was highly successful and also popular
with farmers, eventually shifting from a few government funded projects to hundreds of private buffalo
breeding farms (Laubscher and Hoffman, 2012). Additionally, Kruger National Park did extensive BTb
monitoring surveys between 1993 and 2007, to assess the spread and impact of BTb in herds, and
determine if the disease was having population level effects. Since it entered the park, BTb has been
detected in 12 spill-over species (Michel et al., 2006) and remains a concern in low density species, such
as wild dog and black rhinoceros (Higgitt et al., 2019).
With the disease currently not shown to be affecting population recruitment or growth in buffalo, the
real concern becomes spill-over to other hosts and therefore finding an effective vaccine that limits
disease severity and spill-over is a priority. Currently there is only one registered vaccine for BTb
control. The BCG vaccine is predominantly used in humans but has yielded promising results for use in
domestic cattle (Arnot and Michel, 2020). However, when trialled in wild buffalo within the Kruger
National Park, the BCG vaccine protection was insufficient and did not limit bacterial shedding (De
Klerk et al., 2010). This was thought to have resulted from priming with environmental non-TB
mycobacteria, which has been shown to reduce the protective efficacy of the BCG vaccine (Brandt et al.,
2002; De Klerk et al., 2010). Importantly similar studies in badgers in the UK found the BCG vaccine to
be effective in limiting disease severity (and therefore bacterial load; Chambers et al., 2011), meaning
that defining the clinical end point for vaccine efficacy trials is important. Another vaccination trial in
buffalo is currently underway, testing both BCG and DNA-sub-unit vaccines.
This ecological heterogeneity within the park can create spatial heterogeneity in disease dynamics. A
park wide survey of RVF in buffalo in 1998 showed significantly higher seroprevalence of buffalo herds
in the south and central regions of the park compared to the north (Beechler et al., 2015a). This was
attributed to lower rainfall and different vegetation in the north leading to less suitable breeding
habitats for mosquito vectors (Beechler et al., 2015a). Brucellosis prevalence in buffalo was significantly
associated with park section and soil type (Gorsich et al., 2015). Buffalo captured on the resource poor
granitic soils were twice as likely to be seropositive for brucellosis compared to those on the resource
rich basaltic soils (Gorsich et al., 2015). Moreover, buffalo on granitic soils had higher prevalence in the
southern section of the park compared to the central section (Gorsich et al., 2015). This was attributed to
nutrient poor vegetation in the southwestern granitic soils and general lower body condition of buffalo
in the south of Kruger National Park (Caron et al., 2003; Gorsich et al., 2015). The effect of brucellosis
infection was also dependant on the seasonal heterogeneity of the park, brucellosis infection was
significantly associated with lower body condition but only in the dry season (Gorsich et al., 2015).
Knowledge of this heterogeneity of different disease dynamics and how the landscape and environment
affect this is of great importance and can help target monitoring and management of diseases within the
park.
4.3.5: Co-infections
Since over 80% of all known species are parasitic, co-occurrence of different parasites is the norm
(Vaumourin et al., 2015). Such co-infections can be synergistic, by which one parasite facilitates the
infection of other parasites, antagonistic where one parasite inhibits infection of other parasites, or can
have no effect on each other (Hoarau et al., 2020; Vaumourin et al., 2015). A pathogen can alter the host's
immune response making it more susceptible to others (Ezenwa et al., 2010). Co-infections of closely
related parasite species or strains can lead to hybridisation, potentially creating more virulent pathogens
as seen with certain schistosome species (Huyse et al., 2009). In South Africa the predominantly animal
schistosome species S. mattheei has become increasingly prevalent in humans, thought to be due to
hybridisation with the human species S. haematobium (see Pitchford, 1961). This was confirmed
experimentally, resulting in fertile first generation (F1) hybrids which were more infective and
developed more quickly than the parents (Pitchford, 1961; Taylor, 1970; Wright and Ross, 1980).
However, prior infection with S. haematobium or S. mansoni seems necessary for S. mattheei to become
established in humans (Pitchford, 1961).
Over the last decade a body of research has been conducted assessing the impact of co-infections on
disease dynamics within African parks and the findings are concerning (Beechler et al., 2015b, 2019;
Broughton et al., 2021; Budischak et al., 2012; Ezenwa et al., 2010; Sylvester et al., 2017). In the
Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, helminth infections have been shown to alter the immune response of wild
buffalo, which could make them more susceptible to BTb infection (Ezenwa et al., 2010). Nematode
infected individuals had a depressed Th1 immune response, which is important in controlling BTb
infection and other intracellular microparasite infections, whereas Th1 responses were enhanced in
hosts that were nematode resistant. Disease modelling predicted that without these nematodes, BTb
would not have established infection in the buffalo population (Ezenwa et al., 2010). In 2008, an
outbreak of RVF occurred in a buffalo breeding facility close to the southern section of Kruger National
Park. To determine the effect of existing BTb infection on the dynamics of RVF outbreak, BTb positive
and BTb negative individuals were monitored for RVF before and during an outbreak. Bovine Tb
positive individuals had a twofold greater risk of RVF infection than BTb negative individuals. Bovine
Tb infection also worsened the clinical effects of RVF with pregnant co-infected individuals six times
more likely to abort than those with just RVF infections (Beechler et al., 2015b). Scaled-up models of
these data also showed that the presence of BTb increases the risk of RVF infection for the entire herd,
not just those infected with BTb. These findings were mirrored in free-ranging buffalo within the park
(Beechler et al., 2015b). Bovine Tb can also alter the composition of parasites within a host. Buffalo
within Kruger National Park that acquired BTb infections showed significant increases in both
taxonomic and functional parasite richness, as well as shifts in composition associated with the loss of
nematodes and gain of schistosomes (Beechler et al., 2019). Co-infections may also reduce the efficacy of
diagnostic tests. British calves experimentally infected with F. hepatica and M. bovis reacted less strongly
to the single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test (SICCT) than those infected with M. bovis
alone (Claridge et al., 2012).
Another important co-infection that could threaten the conservation of another ‘Big Five’ species is
BTb and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) in lions (Sylvester et al., 2017). Feline Immunodeficiency
Virus is endemic to these keystone predators, yet BTb was not reported in Kruger National Park's lions
until 1996 (Keet et al., 2010). As FIV can cause lymphocyte deficiencies, infected lions may be
predisposed to infection with BTb. Within Kruger National Park, lions positive for FIV were more likely
(although this was not significant with a sample size of 56) to be infected with M. bovis than those
negative for FIV (Sylvester et al., 2017). A more recent study concluded that total gastrointestinal
parasite burden and richness was significantly higher in FIV positive lions (Broughton et al., 2021). Co-
infections of the ‘Microscopic Five’ and other diseases in Kruger's wildlife need greater attention as this
could greatly alter the dynamics of diseases previously thought to be benign. Co-infections leading to
hybridisations of human and animal specific schistosome species could also hinder control efforts as the
WHO currently focuses on treating human infection by mass drug administration to school age children
and little is known about whether hybrids could be more resistant to preventative chemotherapy or
whether it could change the age profile of infection. This could delay the WHO's target to eliminate
schistosomiasis as a public health problem by 2030 (Stothard et al., 2020; WHO, 2022).
7: Conclusions
(1) This review focussed on five zoonotic diseases of importance at the wildlife-livestock-human
interface, which pose a threat to the economy, public health and conservation and should be
prioritised for monitoring and management. Using Kruger National Park as a case study we
identified the environmental and anthropogenic drivers of disease dynamics for the
‘Microscopic Five’ within and beyond protected areas. Environmental drivers are important in
within-park, wildlife to wildlife transmission and include climate change, heterogeneity of the
landscape, reservoir/maintenance hosts, mixing at water bodies and co-infections.
Anthropogenic drivers are important at the wildlife-livestock-human interface and include
permeable fences, management of livestock, translocation of game animals, illegal wildlife trade
and transfrontier conservation areas. Environmental drivers may be difficult to control but can
be monitored and management decisions can help mitigate their effects, whereas the
anthropogenic drivers can be controlled by management decisions, communication and
collaboration with local communities, non-government organisations and government
departments.
(2) The wildlife-livestock interface is a key driver of diseases entering and leaving protected areas.
Areas with water sources adjacent to park edges, particularly in the north where livestock and
wildlife densities are greater and more fence breakages occur, should be prioritised for disease
monitoring. Increased human development such as lifestyle estates on the boundary of protected
areas have the potential to introduce additional infections such as Cryptosporidium species. Many
of these interactions are influenced by management strategies including the decision to instal or
remove fencing, creation of water holes or translocation of species. Currently, testing for BTb
and brucellosis before translocation is only mandatory for buffalo yet there are other wildlife
species (and cattle) that are known reservoir hosts. Testing for these high-profile diseases in any
potential reservoir host being translocated across parks and private reserves should be
mandatory. Additionally, if the purpose of wildlife testing is to prevent infection in cattle, then
cattle should be monitored regularly and thoroughly to establish a national negative herd.
Schemes to test and slaughter positive communal cattle and routine testing at abattoir should
also be implemented to identify hot-spot areas.
(3) More research is needed to understand the impact of the ‘Microscopic Five’ on wildlife within
protected areas and other protected areas and particularly how co-infections alter the dynamics
of diseases. For two of the ‘Microscopic Five’, BTb and brucellosis, there are some national
control programs in place, but these may be hindered by co-infections, reservoir species and
climate change. Neglected and emerging diseases such as schistosomiasis and cryptosporidiosis
must be put on the agenda for disease monitoring and control particularly at the human-
livestock-wildlife interface and empirical data is desperately needed to better understand the
threat of these diseases to wildlife, livestock and humans.
(4) Many African protected areas are striving to involve neighbouring communities in their
management approach. Social science and economic studies could help identify mutually
beneficial approaches for both wildlife and people. This would be particularly helpful in
combatting human wildlife conflict and the bush meat trade. As seen in the surrounding
communities of Kruger National Park, complex interactions between cultural practices,
traditions and/or income likely drive human behaviour. Understanding these interactions and
working in mutually beneficial partnerships can help manage some of the anthropogenic drivers
of disease.
(5) Ultimately, conservation of biodiverse ecosystems and maintaining ecological balance is
fundamental to a healthy planet. Protected areas are integral to maintaining this balance yet to
do this successfully, they must adapt and work with the ever-increasing domestic world that
surrounds them, keeping a ‘One Health’ approach in mind. The key knowledge gaps and lessons
from Kruger National Park can be applied across many protected areas and different wildlife-
livestock-human interfaces. On the tail end of a global pandemic, which may well have had its
origin in wildlife, the lesson is clear, holistic approaches to health and well-being are not just
necessary, but vital for our continued existence.
Acknowledgements
We thank Michael Bruford and Sarah Perkins for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
We thank Chenay Simms from Skukuza GIS Office for creating the map of Kruger National Park. This
study was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council GW4 + DTP [NE/L002434/1
studentship to A.V.T].
References
Aanensen et al., 2009 Aanensen D.M., Huntley D.M., Feil E.J., Spratt B.G. EpiCollect: linking
smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection.
PLoS One. 2009;4:e6968.
African parks, 2022 African parks (2022). Johannesburg, South Africa.
https://www.Africanparks.org. Accessed March 10, 2022.
Annecke and Masubelele, 2016 Annecke W., Masubelele M. A review of the impact of
militarisation: the case of rhino poaching in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Conserv. Soc.
2016;14:195–204.
Anthony, 2007 Anthony B. The dual nature of parks: attitudes of neighbouring communities
towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environ. Conserv. 2007;34:236–245.
Arnot and Michel, 2020 Arnot L.F., Michel A. Challenges for controlling bovine tuberculosis in
South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2020;87:1–8.
Ashford, 1997 Ashford R.W. What it takes to be a reservoir host. Belg. J. Zool. 1997;127:85–90.
Ayele et al., 2004 Ayele W.Y., Neill S.D., Zinsstag J., Weiss M.G., Pavlik I. Bovine tuberculosis: an
old disease but a new threat to Africa. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2004;8:924–937.
Bates et al., 2021 Bates A.E., Mangubhai S., Milanés C.B., Rodgers K., Vergara V. The COVID-19
pandemic as a pivot point for biological conservation. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1–4.
Beechler et al., 2015a Beechler B.R., Bengis R., Swanepoel R., Paweska J.T., Kemp A., van Vuren
P.J., Joubert J., Ezenwa V.O., Jolles A.E. Rift Valley fever in Kruger National Park: do buffalo
play a role in the inter-epidemic circulation of virus?. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015a;62:24–32.
Beechler et al., 2017 Beechler B.R., Jolles A.E., Budischak S.A., Corstjens P.L., Ezenwa V.O., Smith
M., Spaan R.S., van Dam G.J., Steinauer M.L. Host immunity, nutrition and coinfection alter
longitudinal infection patterns of schistosomes in a free ranging African buffalo population.
PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11:e0006122.
Beechler et al., 2015b Beechler B.R., Manore C.A., Reininghaus B., O'Neal D., Gorsich E.E., Ezenwa
V.O., Jolles A.E. Enemies and turncoats: bovine tuberculosis exposes pathogenic potential of Rift
Valley fever virus in a common host, African buffalo (Syncerus caffer ). Pro. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.
2015b;282:2014–2942.
Beechler et al., 2019 Beechler B.R., Boersma K.S., Buss P.E., Coon C.A., Gorsich E.E., Henrichs B.S.,
Siepielski A.M., Spaan J.M., Spaan R.S., Ezenwa V.O., Jolles A.E. Bovine tuberculosis disturbs
parasite functional trait composition in African buffalo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
2019;116:14645–14650.
Bengis et al., 1996 Bengis R.G., Kriek N.P.J., Keet D.F., Raath J.P., De Vos V., Huchzermeyer H.F.
An outbreak of bovine tuberculosis in a free-living African buffalo (Syncerus caffer-Sparrman )
population in the Kruger National Park: a preliminary report. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
1996;63:15–18.
Bengis et al., 2001 Bengis R.G., Keet D.F., Kriek N.P.J., Michel A.L. Tuberculosis, caused by
Mycobacterium bovis , in a kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros ) from a commercial game farm in the
Malelane area of the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
2001;68:239–241.
Bengis et al., 2002 Bengis R.G., Kock R.A., Fischer J. Infectious animal diseases: the
wildlife/livestock interface. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2002;21:53–65.
Bengis et al., 2003 Bengis R.G., Grant R., de Vos V. Wildlife diseases and veterinary controls: a
savanna ecosystem perspective. In: The Kruger Experience: Ecology and Management of
Savanna Heterogeneity. Washington: Island Press; 349–369. 2003;vol. 1.
Bezerra-Santos et al., 2021 Bezerra-Santos M.A., Mendoza-Roldan J.A., Thompson R.A., Dantas-
Torres F., Otranto D. Illegal wildlife trade: a gateway to zoonotic infectious diseases. Trends
Parasitol. 2021;37:181–184.
Biek and Real, 2010 Biek R., Real L.A. The landscape genetics of infectious disease emergence and
spread. Mol. Ecol. 2010;19:3515–3531.
Blaikie, 2006 Blaikie P. Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management
in Malawi and Botswana. World Dev. 2006;34:1942–1957.
Blignaut et al., 2020 Blignaut B., van Heerden J., Reininghaus B., Fosgate G.T., Heath L.
Characterization of SAT2 foot-and-mouth disease 2013/2014 outbreak viruses at the wildlife–
livestock interface in South Africa. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020;67:1595–1606.
Brandt et al., 2002 Brandt L., Feino Cunha J., Weinreich Olsen A., Chilima B., Hirsch P., Appelberg
R., Andersen P. Failure of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine: some species of environmental
mycobacteria block multiplication of BCG and induction of protective immunity to tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun. 2002;70:672–678.
Broughton et al., 2021 Broughton H., Govender D., Serrano E., Shikwambana P., Jolles A. Equal
contributions of feline immunodeficiency virus and coinfections to morbidity in African lions.
Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2021;16:83–94.
Budischak et al., 2012 Budischak S.A., Jolles A.E., Ezenwa V.O. Direct and indirect costs of co-
infection in the wild: linking gastrointestinal parasite communities, host hematology, and
immune function. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2012;1:2–12.
Cable et al., 2017 Cable J., Barber I., Boag B., Ellison A.R., Morgan E.R., Murray K., Pascoe E.L., Sait
S.M., Wilson A.J., Booth M. Global change, parasite transmission and disease control: lessons
from ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2017;372:1471–29790.
Caron et al., 2003 Caron A., Cross P.C., Du Toit J.T. Ecological implications of bovine tuberculosis
in African buffalo herds. Ecol. Appl. 2003;13:1338–1345.
Caron et al., 2016 Caron A., Cornelis D., Foggin C., Hofmeyr M., de Garine-Wichatitsky M. African
buffalo movement and zoonotic disease risk across transfrontier conservation areas, southern
Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016;22:277.
Chambers et al., 2011 Chambers M.A., Rogers F., Delahay R.J., Lesellier S., Ashford R., Dalley D.,
Gowtage S., Davé D., Palmer S., Brewer J., Crawshaw T. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination
reduces the severity and progression of tuberculosis in badgers. Pro. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.
2011;278:1913–1920.
Chape et al., 2003 Chape S., Blyth S., Fish L., Fox P., Spalding M. United Nations List of Protected
Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK: IUCN;
2003.
Cheung, 2012 Cheung H. Tourism in Kenya's national parks: a cost-benefit analysis. SURG J.
2012;6:31–40.
Claridge et al., 2012 Claridge J., Diggle P., McCann C.M., Mulcahy G., Flynn R., McNair J., Strain
S., Welsh M., Baylis M., Williams D.J. Fasciola hepatica is associated with the failure to detect
bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1–8.
Clark et al., 2018 Clark M.H., Warimwe G.M., Di Nardo A., Lyons N.A., Gubbins S. Systematic
literature review of Rift Valley fever virus seroprevalence in livestock, wildlife and humans in
Africa from 1968 to 2016. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006627.
World Health Organization, 2020 World Health Organization. Ending the NEGLECT TO Attain
the Sustainable Development Goals: A Road Map for Neglected Tropical Diseases 2021–2030.
2020 Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010352 Retrieved
March 23, 2022.
Cleaveland et al., 2001 Cleaveland S., Laurenson M.K., Taylor L.H. Diseases of humans and their
domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence. Philos.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001;356:991–999.
Cook et al., 2015 Cook R.M., Henley M.D., Parrini F. Elephant movement patterns in relation to
human inhabitants in and around the great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Koedoe. 2015;57:1–7.
Corlatti et al., 2009 Corlatti L., Hacklaender K., Frey-Roos F.R.E.D.Y. Ability of wildlife overpasses
to provide connectivity and prevent genetic isolation. Conserv. Biol. 2009;23:548–556.
Cribb et al., 2003 Cribb T.H., Bray R.A., Olson P.D., Littlewood D.T.J. Life cycle evolution in the
Digenea: a new perspective from phylogeny. Adv. Parasitol. 2003;54:197–254.
Cross et al., 2004 Cross P.C., Lloyd-Smith J.O., Bowers J.A., Hay C.T., Hofmeyr M., Getz W.M.
Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in
African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. In: Annales Zoologici Fennici. Finnish Zoological
and Botanical Publishing Board; 2004:879–892.
Cross et al., 2005 Cross P.C., Lloyd-Smith J.O., Getz W.M. Disentangling association patterns in
fission–fusion societies using African buffalo as an example. Anim. Behav. 2005;69:499–506.
DAFF, 2016 DAFF. Bovine tuberculosis manual. In: Forestry and Fisheries. Department of
Agriculture, Republic of South Africa; 2016
http://www.nda.agric.za/vetweb/pamphlets&Information/Policy/Tuberculosis%20in%20Cattle%
20Interim%20Manual%20for%20the%20Veterinarian%20&%20AHT%20-%20Sept2.pdf.
DAFF, 2017 DAFF. Veterinary procedural notice for buffalo disease risk management in South
Africa. In: Forestry and Fisheries. Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa; 2017.
http://www.daff.gov.za/vetweb/pamphlets&Information/Policy/Buffalo%20Disease%20Risk%20
Management%20VPN_Signed%202017-02-17.pdf.
DAFF, 2021 DAFF. Trends in the agricultural sector. In: Forestry and Fisheries. Department of
Agriculture, Republic of South Africa; 2021.
http://www.daff.gov.za/Portals/0/Statistics%20and%20Economic%20Analysis/Statistical%20Info
rmation/Trends%20in%20the%20Agricultural%20Sector%202021.pdf.
Davies-Mostert et al., 2012 Davies-Mostert H.T., Kamler J.F., Mills M.G., Jackson C.R., Rasmussen
G.S., Groom R.J., Macdonald D.W. Long-distance transboundary dispersal of African wild dogs
among protected areas in southern Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 2012;50:500.
De Klerk et al., 2010 De Klerk L.M., Michel A.L., Bengis R.G., Kriek N.P., Godfroid J. BCG
vaccination failed to protect yearling African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer ) against experimental
intratonsilar challenge with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010;137:84–92.
De Kock and Wolmarans, 1998 De Kock K.N., Wolmarans C.T. A re-evaluation of the occurrence of
freshwater molluscs in the Kruger national park. Koedoe. 1998;41:1–8.
De Kock et al., 2002 De Kock K.N, Wolmarans C.T, Du Preez L.H. Freshwater mollusc diversity in
the Kruger National Park: a comparison between a period of prolonged drought and a period of
exceptionally high rainfall. Koedoe. 2002;45:1–11.
De Vos and Bryden, 1996 De Vos V., Bryden H.B. Anthrax in the Kruger National Park: temporal
and spatial patterns of disease occurrence. Salisbury Med. Bull. 1996;87:26–30.
Dion and Lambin, 2012 Dion E., Lambin E.F. Scenarios of transmission risk of foot-and-mouth
with climatic, social and landscape changes in southern Africa. Appl. Geogr. 2012;35:32–42.
Dion et al., 2011 Dion E., VanSchalkwyk L., Lambin E.F. The landscape epidemiology of foot-and-
mouth disease in South Africa: a spatially explicit multi-agent simulation. Ecol. Model.
2011;222:2059–2072.
Driciru et al., 2021 Driciru E., Koopman J.P.R., Cose S., Siddiqui A.A., Yazdanbakhsh M., Elliott
A.M., Roestenberg M. Immunological considerations for Schistosoma vaccine development:
transitioning to endemic settings. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:635985.
Dube and Nhamo, 2019 Dube K., Nhamo G. Evidence and impact of climate change on south
African national parks. Potential implications for tourism in the Kruger National Park. Environ.
Dev. 2019;33:e100485.
Ducrotoy et al., 2017 Ducrotoy M., Bertu W.J., Matope G., Cadmus S., Conde-Álvarez R., Gusi
A.M., Welburn S., Ocholi R., Blasco J.M., Moriyón I. Brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa: current
challenges for management, diagnosis and control. Acta Trop. 2017;1:179–193.
Durrant et al., 2020 Durrant C., Thiele E.A., Holroyd N., Doyle S.R., Sallé G., Tracey A.,
Sankaranarayanan G., Lotkowska M.E., Bennett H.M., Huckvale T., Abdellah Z. Population
genomic evidence that human and animal infections in Africa come from the same populations
of Dracunculus medinensis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0008623.
Ezenwa et al., 2010 Ezenwa V.O., Etienne R.S., Luikart G., Beja-Pereira A., Jolles A.E. Hidden
consequences of living in a wormy world: nematode-induced immune suppression facilitates
tuberculosis invasion in African buffalo. Am. Nat. 2010;176:613–624.
Fawzy and Helmy, 2019 Fawzy M., Helmy Y.A. The one health approach is necessary for the
control of Rift Valley fever infections in Egypt: a comprehensive review. Viruses. 2019;11:139.
Ferreira, 2004 Ferreira S. Problems associated with tourism development in southern Africa: the
case of Transfrontier conservation areas. GeoJournal. 2004;60:301–310.
Figueiredo, 2019 Figueiredo L.T.M. Human urban arboviruses can infect wild animals and jump to
sylvatic maintenance cycles in South America. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:259.
Gadd, 2012 Gadd M.E. Barriers, the beef industry and unnatural selection: a review of the impact
of veterinary fencing on mammals in southern Africa. In: Fencing for Conservation. New York:
y g g
Springer; 2012:153–186.
Galán-Puchades, 2017 Galán-Puchades M.T. WHO delays guinea-worm disease eradication to
2020: are dogs the sole culprits?. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:1124–1125.
Gaylard and Ferreira, 2011 Gaylard A., Ferreira S. Advances and challenges in the implementation
of strategic adaptive management beyond the Kruger National Park-making linkages between
science and biodiversity management. In: Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and
Science. 1–8. 2011;vol. 53.
Gertenbach, 1983 Gertenbach W.D. Landscapes of the Kruger national park. Koedoe. 1983;26:9–
121.
Glanzmann et al., 2016 Glanzmann B., Möller M., Le Roex N., Tromp G., Hoal E.G., Van Helden
P.D. The complete genome sequence of the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer ). BMC Genomics.
2016;17:1–7.
Godfroid, 2018 Godfroid J. Brucella spp. at the wildlife-livestock interface: an evolutionary
trajectory through a livestock-to-wildlife “host jump”?. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:81.
Godfroid et al., 2013 Godfroid J., Garin-Bastuji B., Saegerman C., Blasco J.M. Brucellosis in
terrestrial wildlife. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2013;32:27–42.
Godfroid et al., 2011 Godfroid J., Scholz H.C., Barbier T., Nicolas C., Wattiau P., Fretin D.,
Whatmore A.M., Cloeckaert A., Blasco J.M., Moriyon I., Saegerman C. Brucellosis at the
animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century. Prev. Vet. Med.
2011;102:118–131.
Gómez and Nichols, 2013 Gómez A., Nichols E. Neglected wild life: parasitic biodiversity as a
conservation target. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013;2:222–227.
Gorsich et al., 2015 Gorsich E.E., Ezenwa V.O., Cross P.C., Bengis R.G., Jolles A.E. Context-
dependent survival, fecundity and predicted population-level consequences of brucellosis in
African buffalo. J. Anim. Ecol. 2015;84:999–1009.
Hanks, 2003 Hanks J. Transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs) in southern Africa: their role in
conserving biodiversity, socioeconomic development and promoting a culture of peace. J.
Sustain. For. 2003;17:127–148.
Haydon et al., 2002 Haydon D.T., Cleaveland S., Taylor L.H., Laurenson M.K. Identifying
reservoirs of infection: a conceptual and practical challenge. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002;8:1468–
1473.
Higgitt et al., 2019 Higgitt R.L., van Schalkwyk O.L., de Klerk-Lorist L.M., Buss P.E., Caldwell P.,
Rossouw L., Manamela T., Hausler G.A., Hewlett J., Mitchell E.P., van Helden P.D.
Mycobacterium bovis infection in African wild dogs, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Emerg.
Infect. Dis. 2019;25:1425.
Hlokwe et al., 2019 Hlokwe T.M., Michel A.L., Mitchel E., Gcebe N., Reininghaus B. First detection
of Mycobacterium bovis infection in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis ) in the greater Kruger National
Park Complex: role and implications. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019;66:2264–2270.
Hlokwe et al., 2014 Hlokwe T.M., Van Helden P., Michel A.L. Evidence of increasing intra and
inter-species transmission of Mycobacterium bovis in South Africa: are we losing the battle?. Prev.
Vet. Med. 2014;115:10–17.
Hoarau et al., 2020 Hoarau A.O., Mavingui P., Lebarbenchon C. Coinfections in wildlife: focus on a
neglected aspect of infectious disease epidemiology. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008790.
Holdo et al., 2009 Holdo R.M., Sinclair A.R., Dobson A.P., Metzger K.L., Bolker B.M., Ritchie M.E.,
Holt R.D. A disease-mediated trophic cascade in the Serengeti and its implications for ecosystem
C. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000210.
Huyse et al., 2009 Huyse T., Webster B.L., Geldof S., Stothard J.R., Diaw O.T., Polman K., Rollinson
D. Bidirectional introgressive hybridisation between cattle and human schistosome species.
PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000571.
Innes et al., 2020 Innes E.A., Chalmers R.M., Wells B., Pawlowic M.C. A one health approach to
tackle cryptosporidiosis. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36:290–303.
Jori et al., 2011 Jori F., Brahmbhatt D., Fosgate G.T., Thompson P.N., Budke C., Ward M.P.,
Ferguson K., Gummow B. A questionnaire-based evaluation of the veterinary cordon fence
separating wildlife and livestock along the boundary of the Kruger National Park, South Africa.
Prev. Vet. Med. 2011;100:210–220.
Jori et al., 2009 Jori F., Vosloo W., Du Plessis B., Bengis R.G., Brahmbhatt D.P., Gummow B.,
Thomson G.R. A qualitative risk assessment of factors contributing to foot and mouth disease
outbreaks in cattle along the western boundary of the Kruger National Park. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off.
Int. Epizoot. 2009;28:917–931.
Karimuribo et al., 2012 Karimuribo E.D., Beda E., Wambura P., Rweyemamu M.M., Sayalel K.,
Kusiluka L.J., Short N., Mboera L.G. Towards one health disease surveillance: the southern
African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance approach: proceeding. Onderstepoort J. Vet.
Res. 2012;79:1–7.
Kaszta et al., 2018 Kaszta Ż., Cushman S.A., Sillero-Zubiri C., Wolff E., Marino J. Where buffalo
and cattle meet: modelling interspecific contact risk using cumulative resistant kernels.
Ecography. 2018;41:1616–1626.
Keet et al., 2000 Keet D.F., Kriek N.P.J., Bengis R.G., Grobler D.G., Michel A.L. The rise and fall of
tuberculosis in a free-ranging chacma baboon troop. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2000;67:115–122.
Keet et al., 2010 Keet D.F., Michel A.L., Bengis R.G., Becker P., Van Dyk D.S., Van Vuuren M.,
Rutten V.P.M.G., Penzhorn B.L. Intradermal tuberculin testing of wild African lions (Panthera leo
) naturally exposed to infection with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;144:384–391.
Kock et al., 2014 Kock R., Kock M., de Garine-Wichatitsky M., Chardonnet P., Caron A. Livestock
and buffalo (Syncerus caffer ) interfaces in Africa: ecology of disease transmission and
implications for conservation and development. In: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour of Wild
Cattle Implication for Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014:608.
Kosmala et al., 2016 Kosmala M., Miller P., Ferreira S., Funston P., Keet D., Packer C. Estimating
wildlife disease dynamics in complex systems using an approximate Bayesian computation
framework. Ecol. Appl. 2016;26:295–308.
Kotloff et al., 2013 Kotloff K.L., Nataro J.P., Blackwelder W.C., Nasrin D., Farag T.H.,
Panchalingam S., Wu Y., Sow S.O., Sur D., Breiman R.F., Faruque A.S. Burden and aetiology of
diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the global enteric
multicenter study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382:209–222.
Laubscher and Hoffman, 2012 Laubscher L, Hoffman L. An overview of disease-free buffalo
breeding projects with reference to the different systems used in South Africa. Sustainability.
2012;4:3124–3140.
le Roex et al., 2016 le Roex N., Cooper D., van Helden P.D., Hoal E.G., Jolles A.E. Disease control in
wildlife: evaluating a test and cull programme for bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo.
Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2016;63:647–657.
Lindsey et al., 2020 Lindsey P., Allan J., Brehony P., Dickman A., Robson A., Begg C., Bhammar H.,
Blanken L., Breuer T., Fitzgerald K., Flyman M., Gandiwa P., Giva N., Kaelo D., Nampindo S.,
Nyambe N., Steiner K., Parker A., Roe D., Thomson P., Trimble M., Caron A., Tyrrell P.
Conserving Africa's wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nat. Ecol.
Evol. 2020;4:1300–1310.
Lindsey et al., 2013 Lindsey P.A., Balme G., Becker M., Begg C., Bento C., Bocchino C., Dickman
A., Diggle R.W., Eves H., Henschel P., Lewis D. The bushmeat trade in African savannas:
impacts, drivers, and possible solutions. Biol. Conserv. 2013;160:80–96.
Lunstrum, 2011 Lunstrum E. An uncomfortable fit? Transfrontier parks as megaprojects. In:
Engineering Earth. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011:1223–1242.
Mabunda et al., 2003 Mabunda D., Pienaar D.J., Verhoef J. The Kruger National Park: a century of
management and research. In: The Kruger Experience: Ecology and Management of Savanna
Heterogeneity. Washington: Island Press; 2003:3–21.
McDermott et al., 2013 McDermott J., Grace D., Zinsstag J. Economics of brucellosis impact and
control in low-income countries. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2013;32:249–261.
Métras et al., 2015 Métras R., Jewell C., Porphyre T., Thompson P.N., Pfeiffer D.U., Collins L.M.,
White R.G. Risk factors associated with Rift Valley fever epidemics in South Africa in 2008–11.
Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–7.
Michel and Bengis, 2012 Michel A.L., Bengis R.G. The African buffalo: a villain for inter-species
spread of infectious diseases in southern Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2012;79:26–30.
Michel et al., 2006 Michel A.L., Bengis R.G., Keet D.F., Hofmeyr M., De Klerk L.M., Cross P.C.,
Jolles A.E., Cooper D., Whyte I.J., Buss P., Godfroid J. Wildlife tuberculosis in south African
conservation areas: implications and challenges. Vet. Microbiol. 2006;112:91–100.
Michel et al., 2009 Michel A.L., Coetzee M.L., Keet D.F., Maré L., Warren R., Cooper D., Bengis
R.G., Kremer K., Van Helden P. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from
free-ranging wildlife in south African game reserves. Vet. Microbiol. 2009;133:335–343.
Michel and Mare, 2000 Michel A.L., Mare L. In: The Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium
bovis Infection in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of
the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics; 2000:1205–1207
Breckenridge, Colorado.
Michel et al., 2019 Michel A.L., Sibanda D.R., de Klerk-Lorist L.M. BTB control strategies in
livestock and wildlife in South Africa. In: Tuberculosis in Animals: An African Perspective.
Cham: Springer; 2019:387–401.
Miescher, 2012 Miescher G. Namibia's Red Line: The History of a Veterinary and Settlement
Border. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
Miguel et al., 2013 Miguel E., Grosbois V., Caron A., Boulinier T., Fritz H., Cornélis D., Foggin C.,
Makaya P.V., Tshabalala P.T., de Garine-Wichatitsky M. Contacts and foot and mouth disease
transmission from wild to domestic bovines in Africa. Ecosphere. 2013;4:1–32.
Mtambo et al., 1997 Mtambo M.M.A., Sebatwale J.B., Kambarage D.M., Muhairwa A.P., Maeda
G.E., Kusiluka L.J.M., Kazwala R.R. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in cattle and
wildlife in Morogoro region, Tanzania. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997;31:185–190.
Mufune, 2015 Mufune P. Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) and
sustainable development in Namibia. J. Land Rural Stud. 2015;3:121–138.
Muhumuza and Balkwill, 2013 Muhumuza M., Balkwill K. Factors affecting the success of
conserving biodiversity in national parks: a review of case studies from Africa. Int. J. Biodivers.
2013;2013:e798101.
Musoke et al., 2015 Musoke J., Hlokwe T., Marcotty T., Du Plessis B.J., Michel A.L. Spillover of
Mycobacterium bovis from wildlife to livestock, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21:448.
Paksi and Pyhälä, 2018 Paksi A., Pyhälä A. Socio-economic impacts of a national park on local
indigenous livelihoods: the case of the Bwabwata national park in Namibia. Senri Ethnol. Stud.
2018;99:197–214.
Palmer, 2013 Palmer M.V. Mycobacterium bovis : characteristics of wildlife reservoir hosts.
Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2013;60:1–13.
Pennance et al., 2021 Pennance T., Ame S.M., Amour A.K., Suleiman R., Cable J., Webster B.L. The
detection of Schistosoma bovis in livestock on Pemba Island, Zanzibar: a preliminary study. Curr.
Res. Parasitol. Vector Borne Dis. 2021;1:100056.
Petrova et al., 2020 Petrova V., Kristiansen P., Norheim G., Yimer S.A. Rift valley fever: diagnostic
challenges and investment needs for vaccine development. BMJ Glob. Health. 2020;5:e002694.
Pienaar, 1961 Pienaar U.D.V. A second outbreak of anthrax amongst game animals in the Kruger
National Park. 5th June to 11th October, 1960. Koedoe. 1961;4:4–17.
Pienaar et al., 1997 Pienaar D.J., Biggs H.C., Deacon A., Gertenbach W., Joubert S., Nel F., Van
Rooyen L., Venter F. A revised water-distribution policy for biodiversity maintenance in the
Kruger national park. In: Kruger Park Management Plan. 165–200. 1997;vol. 8.
Pitchford, 1961 Pitchford R.J. Observations on a possible hybrid between the two schistosomes S.
haematobium and S. mattheei. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1961;55:44–51.
Pitchford and Visser, 1981 Pitchford R.J., Visser P.S. Schistosoma Weinland, 1858 from
Hippopotamus amphibius Linnaeus, 1758 in the Kruger national park. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
1981;48:181–184.
Pitchford et al., 1974 Pitchford R.J., Visser P.S., Pienaar U.D.V., Young E. Further observations on
Schistosoma mattheei , Veglia & Le Roux, 1929, in the Kruger National Park. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc.
1974;45:211–218.
Prins and Weyerhaeuser, 1987 Prins H.H.T., Weyerhaeuser F.J. Epidemics in populations of wild
ruminants: anthrax and impala, rinderpest and buffalo in Lake Manyara National Park,
Tanzania. Oikos. 1987;49:28–38.
Randolph, 2020 Randolph D.G. Preventing the Next Pandemic: Zoonotic Diseases and How to
Break the Chain of Transmission. In: United Nations Environment Programme and
International Livestock Research Institute. 2020. Nairobi, Kenya
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/preventing-future-zoonotic-disease-outbreaks-
protecting-environment-animals-and.
Renwick et al., 2007 Renwick A.R., White P.C.L., Bengis R.G. Bovine tuberculosis in southern
African wildlife: a multi-species host–pathogen system. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007;135:529–540.
Roeder et al., 2013 Roeder P., Mariner J., Kock R. Rinderpest: the veterinary perspective on
eradication. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2013;368:20120139.
Romoser et al., 2011 Romoser W.S., Oviedo M.N., Lerdthusnee K., Patrican L.A., Turell M.J., Dohm
D.J., Linthicum K.J., Bailey C.L. Rift Valley fever virus-infected mosquito ova and associated
pathology: possible implications for endemic maintenance. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2011;2:121.
Rwego et al., 2016 Rwego I.B., Babalobi O.O., Musotsi P., Nzietchueng S., Tiambo C.K., Kabasa
J.D., Naigaga I., Kalema-Zikusoka G., Pelican K. One health capacity building in sub-Saharan
Africa. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2016;6:e34032.
Saayman et al., 2018 Saayman M., van der Merwe P., Saayman A. The economic impact of trophy
hunting in the south African wildlife industry. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018;16:e00510.
Samra et al., 2011 Samra N.A., Jori F., Samie A., Thompson P. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium
spp. oocysts in wild mammals in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Vet. Parasitol.
2011;175:155–159.
Samra et al., 2013 Samra N.A., Jori F., Xiao L., Rikhotso O., Thompson P.N. Molecular
characterization of Cryptosporidium species at the wildlife/livestock interface of the Kruger
National Park, South Africa. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013;36:295–302.
Samra et al., 2016 Samra N.A., Thompson P.N., Jori F., Caccio S.M., Frean J., Poonsamy B.
Cryptosporidium genotypes in children and calves living at the wildlife or livestock interface of
the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2016;83:1–7.
Schwabl et al., 2017 Schwabl P., Llewellyn M.S., Landguth E.L., Andersson B., Kitron U., Costales
J.A., Ocaña S., Grijalva M.J. Prediction and prevention of parasitic diseases using a landscape
genomics framework. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:264–275.
Scott, 1988 Scott M.E. The impact of infection and disease on animal populations: implications for
conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 1988;2:40–56.
Serdeczny et al., 2017 Serdeczny O., Adams S., Baarsch F., Coumou D., Robinson A., Hare W.,
Schaeffer M., Perrette M., Reinhardt J. Climate change impacts in sub-Saharan Africa: from
physical changes to their social repercussions. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2017;17:1585–1600.
Sichewo et al., 2019b Sichewo P.R., Etter E., Michel A. Cross species transmission of Mycobacterium
bovis infection at the wildlife/livestock interface in South Africa. In: Abstract of the 17th Annual
SASVEPM Congress: Epidemiology in Action ; 2019b:22 (Annual SASVEPM Congress. 17,
Umhlanga, South Africa).
Sichewo et al., 2019a Sichewo P.R., Michel A.L., Musoke J., Etter E. Risk factors for zoonotic
tuberculosis at the wildlife–livestock–human Interface in South Africa. Pathogens. 2019a;8:101.
Spies et al., 2018 Spies A., Nyambi A., Schraader B., Greaver C., Simms C., Wigley-Coetsee C.,
Visagie D., Riddell E., Coestzee M., Thwala D., Pienaar D., Govender D., Daemane E., Phillips
G., Zambatis G., et al. Kruger National Park Management Plan 2018–
2028.https://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/conservation/park_man/knp-draft-plan.pdf. 2018.
Sprehn et al., 2015 Sprehn C.G., Blum M.J., Quinn T.P., Heins D.C. Landscape genetics of
Schistocephalus solidus parasites in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus ) from Alaska.
PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122307.
Squire and Ryan, 2017 Squire S.A., Ryan U. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Africa: current and
future challenges. Parasit. Vectors. 2017;10:195.
Standley et al., 2012 Standley C.J., Dobson A.P., Stothard J.R. Out of animals and back again:
schistosomiasis as a zoonosis in Africa. In: Schistosomiasis. Croatia: InTech; 2012:209–230.
Staver et al., 2019 Staver A.C., Wigley-Coetsee C., Botha J. Grazer movements exacerbate grass
declines during drought in an African savanna. J. Ecol. 2019;107:1482–1491.
Steinmann et al., 2006 Steinmann P., Keiser J., Bos R., Tanner M., Utzinger J. Schistosomiasis and
water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk.
Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006;6:411–425.
Stevenson-Hamilton, 1957 Stevenson-Hamilton J. Tsetse fly and the rinderpest epidemic of 1986. S.
Afr. J. Sci. 1957;53:216.
Storfer et al., 2018 Storfer A., Patton A., Fraik A.K. Navigating the interface between landscape
genetics and landscape genomics. Front. Genet. 2018;9:68.
Stothard et al., 2020 Stothard J.R., Kayuni S.A., Al-Harbi M.H., Musaya J., Webster B.L. Future
schistosome hybridizations: will all Schistosoma haematobium hybrids please stand-up!. PLoS
Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0008201.
Suzán et al., 2012 Suzán G., Esponda F., Carrasco-Hernández R., Aguirre A.A., Ostfeld R.S. Habitat
fragmentation and infectious disease ecology. In: Aguirre A.A., Ostfeld R., Daszak P., eds. New
Directions in Conservation Medicine: Applied Cases of Ecological Health. USA: Oxford
University Press; 2012.
Suzman, 2001 Suzman J. An Introduction to the Regional Assessment of the Status of the San in
Southern Africa. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre; 2001.4.
Swanson et al., 2016 Swanson A., Kosmala M., Lintott C., Packer C. A generalized approach for
producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conserv. Biol.
2016;30:520–531.
Swanson et al., 2015 Swanson A., Kosmala M., Lintott C., Simpson R., Smith A., Packer C. Snapshot
Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African
savanna. Scientific Data. 2015;2:1–14.
Swemmer et al., 2017 Swemmer L., Mmethi H., Twine W. Tracing the cost/benefit pathway of
protected areas: a case study of the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecosyst. Serv.
2017;28:162–172.
Swinton et al., 2002 Swinton J.M.E.J., Woolhouse M.E.J., Begon M.E., Dobson A.P., Ferroglio E.,
Grenfell B.T., Guberti V., Hails R.S., Heesterbeek J.A.P., Lavazza A., Roberts M.G. Microparasite
transmission and persistence. In: The Ecology of Wildlife Diseases. Oxford: Oxford University
Press; 2002.
Sylvester et al., 2017 Sylvester T.T., Martin L.E.R., Buss P., Loxton A.G., Hausler G.A., Rossouw L.,
van Helden P., Parsons S.D.C., Olea-Popelka F., Miller M.A. Prevalence and risk factors for
Mycobacterium bovis infection in African lions (Panthera leo ) in the Kruger National Park. J. Wildl.
Dis. 2017;53:372–376.
Taylor, 1970 Taylor M.G. Hybridisation experiments on five species of African schistosomes. J.
Helminthol. 1970;44:253–314.
Taylor, 2012 Taylor J.J. Identity, authority and CBNRM. In: Naming the Land: San Identity and
Community Conservation in Namibia's West Caprivi. Basler Afrika Bibliographien; 28–50.
2012;vol. 12.
Ung et al., 2021 Ung L., Stothard J.R., Phalkey R., Azman A.S., Chodosh J., Hanage W.P., Standley
C.J. Towards global control of parasitic diseases in the Covid-19 era: one health and the future of
multisectoral global health governance. Adv. Parasitol. 2021;114:1–26.
United Nations Environmental Programme, 2022 United Nations Environmental Programme
(2022). Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/speech/one-health-global-map.
Accessed March 12, 2022.
van Wilgen et al., 2016 van Wilgen B.W., Boshoff N., Smit I.P., Solano-Fernandez S., Van der Walt
L. A bibliometric analysis to illustrate the role of an embedded research capability in south
African national parks. Scientometrics. 2016;107:185–212.
Vaumourin et al., 2015 Vaumourin E., Vourc'h G., Gasqui P., Vayssier-Taussat M. The importance
of multiparasitism: examining the consequences of co-infections for human and animal health.
Parasit. Vectors. 2015;8:1–13.
Venter et al., 2003 Venter F.J., Scholes R.J., Eckhardt H.C. The abiotic template and its associated
vegetation pattern. In: Du Toit J.T., Rogersand K.H., Biggs H.C., eds. The Kruger Experience:
g p g gg g p
Ecology and Management of Savanna Heterogeneity. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003:83–
129.
Venter et al., 2008 Venter F.J., Naiman R.J., Biggs H.C., Pienaar D.J. The evolution of conservation
management philosophy: science, environmental change and social adjustments in Kruger
National Park. Ecosystems. 2008;11:173–192.
Vosloo et al., 2009 Vosloo W., Thompson P.N., Botha B., Bengis R.G., Thomson G.R. Longitudinal
study to investigate the role of impala (Aepyceros melampus ) in foot-and-mouth disease
maintenance in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009;56:18–30.
Warchol and Johnson, 2009 Warchol G., Johnson B. Wildlife crime in the game reserves of South
Africa: a research note. Int. J. Comp. Appl. Crim. Just. 2009;33:143–154.
Wasserman et al., 2013 Wasserman T.N., Cushman S.A., Littell J.S., Shirk A.J., Landguth E.L.
Population connectivity and genetic diversity of American marten (Martes Americana ) in the
United States northern Rocky Mountains in a climate change context. Conserv. Genet.
2013;14:529–541.
Webster et al., 2016 Webster J.P., Gower C.M., Knowles S.C., Molyneux D.H., Fenton A. One
health–an ecological and evolutionary framework for tackling neglected zoonotic diseases. Evol.
Appl. 2016;9:313–333.
Wielgus et al., 2021 Wielgus E., Caron A., Bennitt E., De Garine-Wichatitsky M., Cain B., Fritz H.,
Miguel E., Cornélis D., Chamaillé-Jammes S. Inter-group social behavior, contact patterns and
risk for pathogen transmission in cape buffalo populations. J. Wildl. Manag. 2021;85:1574–1590.
Williams et al., 2016 Williams R., Malherbe J., Weepener H., Majiwa P., Swanepoel R. Anomalous
high rainfall and soil saturation as combined risk indicator of Rift Valley fever outbreaks, South
Africa, 2008–2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016;22:2054.
Winterbach, 1998 Winterbach H.E.K. Research review: the status and distribution of cape buffalo
Syncerus caffer caffer in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 1998;28:82–88.
Wolmarans and De Kock, 2006 Wolmarans C.T., De Kock K.N. The current status of freshwater
molluscs in the Kruger National Park. Koedoe. 2006;49:39–44.
World Health Organisation, 2017 World Health Organisation. The Tripartite's Commitment:
Providing Multisectoral, Collaborative Leadership in Addressing Health Challenges. 2017
Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/zoonoses/tripartite_oct2017.pdf Retrieved March 23,
2022.
World Health Organization, 2022 World Health Organization. WHO Guideline on Control and
Elimination of Human Schistosomiasis. Geneva: Switzerland; 2022.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240041608 Retrieved March 23, 2022.
Wright and Ross, 1980 Wright C.A., Ross G.C. Hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and S.
mattheei and their identification by isoelectric focusing of enzymes. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med.
Hyg. 1980;74:326–332.
Zahedi et al., 2016 Zahedi A., Paparini A., Jian F., Robertson I., Ryan U. Public health significance
of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in wildlife: critical insights into better drinking water
management. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2016;5:88–109.
Zambatis and Biggs, 1995 Zambatis N., Biggs H.C. Rainfall and temperatures during the 1991/92
drought in the Kruger National Park. Koedoe. 1995;38:1–16.
Chapter Two: Improving translational power in
antischistosomal drug discovery
Alexandra Probsta,b,†; Stefan Biendla,b,†; Jennifer Keisera,b,* a Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Department of
Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Basel, Switzerland
b University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
† Contributed equally (joint first authorship)
* Corresponding author: email address: jennifer.keiser@swisstph.ch.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is a poverty-associated tropical disease caused by blood dwelling trematodes that
threaten approximately 10% of the world population. Praziquantel, the sole drug currently
available for treatment, is insufficient to eliminate the disease and the clinical drug development
pipeline is empty. Here, we review the characteristics of the patent Schistosoma mansoni mouse
model used for in vivo antischistosomal drug discovery, highlighting differences in the
experimental set-up across research groups and their potential influence on experimental results.
We explore the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of selected drug candidates,
showcasing opportunities to improve the drug profile to accelerate the transition from the early
drug discovery phase to new clinical candidates.
Keywords
Anthelminthics; Drug discovery; Schistosoma mansoni; Schistosomiasis; Mouse model;
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics
Box 1
Highlights
• Praziquantel activity against ex vivo adult S. mansoni isolates of South American and Western
African origin does not differ significantly.
• Academic research groups distributed over only a few public institutions drive in vivo drug
efficacy research on S. mansoni. Biologic variability of mouse strain and gender as well as parasite
isolates origin offer the advantage of obtaining a broader coverage of naturally occurring
pathogen and host disease variability.
• Infection intensity of the patent S. mansoni mouse model follows a linear correlation to the
number of cercariae s.c. injected per mouse.
• Praziquantel plasma exposure does not correlate with the in vivo efficacy in juvenile S. mansoni-
infected mice.
• Chronic S. mansoni infection influences exposure parameters of drugs.
• No general rules apply regarding the correlation between in vivo drug efficacy and kinetic
disposition; experimental differences must be taken in account when evaluating PK/PD
relationship.
FIG. 1Praziquantel (PZQ) and (R)-Praziquantel (R-PZQ) in vitro activity against adult
S. mansoni from isolates of Brazilian and Liberian origin after 1, 24 and 72 h of drug
exposure. Each point represents the mean EC50 value, and the error bars represent
the 95% confidence interval of the mean.
Table 1
Generally, young animals are infected shortly after purchase and acclimatization to improve
susceptibility to infection. Further, there is good accordance between research groups on infection
duration to achieve juvenile and adult (patent infection) worm life stages reflecting the parasite life cycle
in the host organism.
We identified three main variations influencing mouse model characteristics of the various
laboratories and complicating direct comparability of experimental results. First, utilization of mice of
different strain and gender. All research groups use other but similar general purpose mouse strains
(e.g. NMRI, Swiss Webster), with the exception of researchers at LSHTM and TBRI both employing CD1
mice (Botros et al., 2020; Gardner et al., 2021). However, researchers at TBRI utilize male mice, while
most other groups, including the group at LSHTM, utilize female mice in their studies due to their
increased susceptibility to infection (Eloi-Santos et al., 1992; Nakazawa et al., 1997). The effect of mice
strain on experimental end-points remains largely unknown, but is likely to influence susceptibility to
infection, parasite and disease development as well as drug pharmacokinetics (Bickle et al., 1980;
Cheever et al., 1987), similar to mouse gender. Finally, insufficient reporting of mouse characteristics
occasionally impedes complete appraisal of individual study methodology (Katz et al., 2013; Silva et al.,
2021; Xavier et al., 2020).
Second, utilization of parasites of different isolate origin (described above) as well as infection route
and dose. Although mouse body or tail immersion into a cercariae suspension was predominantly used,
especially by groups from the Middle East and South America (Botros et al., 2020; de Moraes et al., 2014;
Silva et al., 2017), s.c. infection nowadays is most commonly employed, likely due to the ease of
application and higher control over the quantity of introduced parasites (Gardner et al., 2021; Lombardo
et al., 2019a; Silva et al., 2021). Infection intensity varies between 70 and 150 applied cercariae per mouse
rendering an optimized trade-off between worm yield and severity of disease responsibly for disease
burden and stress of the animal subject.
Third, worm recovery methodology and drug effect evaluation. Worm burden reduction (WBR) is
consensually considered as the main read-out for drug effect evaluation. Additionally, most groups,
except the European groups at LSHTM and Swiss TPH, evaluate drug effect on egg reduction rate.
Differential weighing of such additional read-outs in drug effect evaluation can provoke minor
deviations in conclusions arising from consistent experimental results. Further, to accurately determine
worm burden, worms need to be removed exhaustively from sacrificed mice and counted. While reverse
perfusion of the hepatic portal system is the mainstay of adult worm recovery and the only practicable
methodology for the recovery of the smaller juvenile worms, direct picking of adult worms from their
dwelling site after mouse dissection provides equivalent results and offers an alternative procedure that
is less time sensitive and offers the advantage that the hepatic shift can be determined. While most other
of these identified variations are likely to affect experimental results only slightly, differences in mouse
strain and gender are gateways for biologic variability potentially resulting in discrepancies between
laboratories. However, especially the later differences in addition to utilization of parasite isolates of
different origin offer the advantage of obtaining a broader coverage of naturally occurring pathogen and
host disease variability and might thus improve translatability of laboratory examinations to real-world
environments.
The virtue of The belief in the divine origin of the imperial house
loyalty to the
Emperor, or
of Japan makes loyalty to the Emperor the supreme
patriotism 201
duty. During the ascendancy of feudalism this duty,
in so far as the samurai class was concerned, was, it is true,
overshadowed by the duty of loyalty to one’s immediate feudal
superior. The sentiment due the Emperor was intercepted by the
daimyos. But in theory loyalty to the imperial house has ever been
the paramount virtue of the Japanese. The Emperor’s command is to
his subjects as the command of God to us, and obedience must be
perfect and unquestioning. So dominant is the place assigned this
virtue of loyalty to the head of the nation that the Japanese moralist
seems almost to make morality consist in this single virtue, as if “to
fear the Emperor and to keep his commandments” were the full duty
202
of man.
This sentiment of the people toward the imperial family renders
the government a sort of theocracy. Hence patriotism with the
Japanese is in large measure a religious feeling. Indeed, patriotism
has been called the religion of the Japanese. It is this virtue, exalted
to a degree which the world has never seen surpassed, which has
contributed more than any other quality of the Japanese character to
make Japan a great nation and to give her the victory over a
powerful foe in one of the most gigantic wars of modern times.