Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applied Water Science Volume 1 Fundamentals and Applications Inamuddin Full Chapter PDF
Applied Water Science Volume 1 Fundamentals and Applications Inamuddin Full Chapter PDF
Applied Water Science Volume 1 Fundamentals and Applications Inamuddin Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/applied-water-science-
volume-2-remediation-technologies-inamuddin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/applied-soil-chemistry-inamuddin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/biodiesel-technology-and-
applications-inamuddin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/biodegradable-materials-and-their-
applications-inamuddin/
Reservoir Characterization: Fundamentals and
Applications. Volume 2 Fred Aminzadeh
https://ebookmass.com/product/reservoir-characterization-
fundamentals-and-applications-volume-2-fred-aminzadeh/
https://ebookmass.com/product/mathematics-and-computer-science-
volume-1-sharmistha-ghosh/
https://ebookmass.com/product/polymer-science-and-nanotechnology-
fundamentals-and-applications-1st-edition-ravin-narain/
https://ebookmass.com/product/self-healing-smart-materials-and-
allied-applications-inamuddin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/polymers-coatings-technology-and-
applications-1st-edition-inamuddin/
Applied Water Science Volume 1
Scrivener Publishing
100 Cummings Center, Suite 541J
Beverly, MA 01915-6106
Publishers at Scrivener
Martin Scrivener (martin@scrivenerpublishing.com)
Phillip Carmical (pcarmical@scrivenerpublishing.com)
Applied Water Science Volume 1
Edited by
Inamuddin,
Mohd Imran Ahamed,
Rajender Boddula,
and
Tauseef Ahmad Rangreez
This edition first published 2021 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
and Scrivener Publishing LLC, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 541J, Beverly, MA 01915, USA
© 2021 Scrivener Publishing LLC
For more information about Scrivener publications please visit www.scrivenerpublishing.com.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other-
wise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title
is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley prod-
ucts visit us at www.wiley.com.
ISBN 978-1-119-72476-6
Set in size of 11pt and Minion Pro by Manila Typesetting Company, Makati, Philippines
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
Preface xix
1 Sorbent-Based Microextraction Techniques for the Analysis
of Phthalic Acid Esters in Water Samples 1
Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo, Javier González-Sálamo,
Diana A. Varela-Martínez and Javier Hernández-Borges
1.1 Introduction 2
1.2 Solid-Phase Microextraction 6
1.3 Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction 25
1.4 Solid-Phase Extraction 26
1.5 Others Minor Sorbent-Based Microextraction Techniques 48
1.6 Conclusions 52
Acknowledgements 53
References 53
2 Occurrence, Human Health Risks, and Removal of
Pharmaceuticals in Aqueous Systems: Current Knowledge
and Future Perspectives 63
Willis Gwenzi, Artwell Kanda, Concilia Danha,
Norah Muisa-Zikali and Nhamo Chaukura
2.1 Introduction 64
2.2 Occurrence and Behavior of Pharmaceutics
in Aquatic Systems 65
2.2.1 Nature and Sources 65
2.2.2 Dissemination and Occurrence in Aquatic Systems 67
2.2.3 Behaviour in Aquatic Systems 71
2.3 Human Health Risks and Their Mitigation 73
2.3.1 Human Exposure Pathways 73
2.3.2 Potential Human Health Risks 74
2.3.3 Human Health Risks: A Developing World Perspective 81
2.3.4 Removal of Pharmaceuticals 82
v
vi Contents
Water is one of the precious and basic needs of life for all living beings and
is a precious national asset. Without it, the existence of life cannot be imag-
ined. Availability of pure water is decreasing day by day, and water scarcity
has become a major problem that is faced by our society for the past few
years. Hence, it is essential to find and disseminate the key solutions for
water quality and scarcity issues. The inaccessibility and poor water qual-
ity continue to pose a major threat to human health worldwide. Around
billions of people lacking to access drinkable water. The water contains the
pathogenic impurities, which are responsible for water-borne diseases. The
concept of water quality mainly depends on the chemical, physical, biolog-
ical, and radiological measurement standards to evaluate the water quality
and determine the concentration of all components and then to compare
the results of this concentration with the purpose for which this water is
xix
xx Preface
used. Therefore, awareness and a firm grounding in water science are the
primary needs of readers, professionals, and researchers working in this
research area.
This book explores the basic concepts and applications of water sci-
ence. It provides an in-depth look at water pollutants’ classification, water
recycling, qualitative and quantitative analysis, and efficient wastewater
treatment methodologies. It also provides occurrence, human health
risk assessment, strategies for removal of radionuclides, and pharma-
ceuticals in aquatic systems. The book chapters are written by leading
researchers throughout the world. This book is an invaluable guide to
students, professors, scientists, and R&D industrial specialists working
in the field of environmental science, geoscience, water science, physics,
and chemistry.
Chapter 1 provides a general overview of different analytical method-
ologies that have been proposed for the analysis of phthalic acid esters in
water samples. Special attention has been given to methods based on the
application of sorbent-based microextraction techniques (i.e., solid-phase
microextraction and micro solid-phase extraction magnetized or not,
among others).
Chapter 2 discusses the occurrence, dissemination, and behavior of
pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments. Human exposure pathways and
health risks, including the emergence of antimicrobial resistance are sum-
marized. Risk factors promoting human exposure in developing countries
are discussed. Methods for removal of pharmaceuticals and future research
directions are also highlighted.
Chapter 3 focuses on the latest developments in the methods for the oil/
water separation through filtration of the membrane using distinct materi-
als with surface properties that are super wetting.
Chapter 4 presents the fundamental studies on the interdisciplinary
issue of microplastic-based pollution of water environments; the scientific
approach and roadmap to this complex problem are discussed.
Chapter 5 summarizes the routes of formation of organic and inorganic
chloramines upon chlorination disinfection. Chloramine’s possible health
risks to humans including mutagenicity and hemolytic anemia are dis-
cussed. Further, the analytical methods for their control in aqueous envi-
ronments are summarized. Selective methods including chromatographic
and pH-controlled colorimetric techniques are highlighted.
Chapter 6 highlights the removal of industrial dyes using different
approaches such as clay-based adsorbents, membrane filtration, and chem-
ical treatment with special focus on clay-based low-cost adsorbents. The
Preface xxi
results of dyes’ adsorption study are discussed and compared with other
reported wastewater treatment technologies.
Chapter 7 provides a general description of biochar material from the
preparation (synthetic methods) to its application as a powerful adsor-
bent in the wastewater treatment field. Recent advancements of biochar-
supported materials with a focus on their applications for different
contaminants’ removal and the underlying mechanisms are also discussed.
Chapter 8 focuses on biological processes for swine wastewater treat-
ment. Therefore, it details the swine wastewater characteristics, microor-
ganisms, metabolic pathways involved, and biological processes in swine
wastewater treatment. Besides, challenges and prospects in this research
field are also presented.
Chapter 9 discusses various imperative techniques to detect hazardous
metal ions in various water reservoirs. The toxicological effects of various
metal ions on living beings and atmosphere along with their detection lim-
its, in addition to future perspectives of these procedures, are highlighted.
Chapter 10 discusses the production of hydrogen-rich water and its
role in medical applications. Firstly, a concise discussion of two of the pro-
duction methods of hydrogen-rich water is provided. Lastly, the medical
benefits, medical applications, and the safety of hydrogen-rich water are
discussed in detail.
Chapter 11 focuses on the application of hydrosulfide treatment in med-
icine, agriculture, and industry fields. Hydrosulfide anion is considered as
an innovative gaseous signaling molecule and plays significant biologi-
cal roles in the organisms. Its performance is discussed in detail for the
improvement of biotic/abiotic stress tolerance of cells.
Chapter 12 discusses the properties of available radionuclides including
uranium, lead, polonium, cesium, strontium, thorium, radon, and radium.
Moreover, the health problem caused due to these radionuclides contam-
inated water is also highlighted. Techniques involved in the removal of
radionuclides including ion exchange, aeration, filtration, nanofiltration,
and flocculation are summarized.
Chapter 13 reviews the developing applications of membrane contactors
in water treatment and desalination demonstrating their ability to substi-
tute or supplement the conventional separation processes. The advantages
and limitations of membrane contactors are discussed and their potential
for value recovery from spent streams of small and medium industries are
highlighted.
Chapter 14 comprehensively reviews all the sulfate remediation tech-
nologies and also lists various methods involved in tackling the sulfate
xxii Preface
Abstract
Current society is living in a world in which it is exposed to a broad spectrum of
contaminants that can pose different risks for health. In this sense, we are daily
bombarded with news related to pollution by plastic residues (especially in the
oceans), being one of the main issues that humans must face today, not only
because of the direct effects of plastics but also because of the variety of contami-
nants they can release to the environment. Probably, the most important ones are
phthalic acid esters (PAEs), since they easily migrate from the polymeric matrix to
the surrounding media, acting as endocrine disruptors in human organisms and
resulting in multiple diseases. Their occurrence in water matrices is of especial
importance, since it is essential for life, and the presence of PAEs, even at very low
levels, can cause serious health problems. This book chapter aims at providing a
general and critical overview of the different analytical methodologies that have
been developed for the analysis of PAEs in water samples and which are based on
the application of sorbent-based microextraction techniques, which is one of the
current trends in the Analytical Chemistry field.
Inamuddin, Mohd Imran Ahamed, Rajender Boddula, and Tauseef Ahmad Rangreez (eds.) Applied
Water Science Volume 1: Fundamentals and Applications, (1–62) © 2021 Scrivener Publishing LLC
1
2 Applied Water Science Volume 1
1.1 Introduction
Phthalic acid esters (PAEs) are a group of dialkyl or alkylaryl esters of
phthalic acid (see Figure 1.1), commonly known as phthalates, which
are widely used as additives in the polymer industry but also added to
paints, adhesives, lubricants, and cosmetics, among others [2]. As an
example, low-molecular PAEs such as butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP),
dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP) are widely used
as solvents and emulsifiers to maintain color and fragrance mainly in
beauty products and pharmaceuticals, while high-molecular PAEs such
as di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are highly used as plasticizers to
make polymeric materials more workable and flexible. As a result of the
extremely high production of such products, especially plastics, PAEs are
exorbitantly present in the daily life. Among them, DEHP is the most
currently used. In fact, its production as plasticizer is estimated to be
a quarter of the total [3, 4]. Due to these widespread applications and
intensive production, together with the fact that they are only retained
in the polymer structure through weak secondary molecular interactions
and not covalently, PAEs can easily migrate to the environment. As a
result, PAEs have become ubiquitous contaminants in the environment,
in particular, they can be found in natural waters such as lake, river, sea,
and ground waters [5, 6], especially those adjacent or downstream from
industrial locations [5]. In addition, their possible migration to drink-
ing waters that are in contact with plastic materials like mineral and tap
waters must also be taken into account, as well as their final presence in
waste waters [5, 7].
It has already been demonstrated that many PAEs act as endocrine dis-
ruptors and that they can be toxic for reproduction, even at extremely
low concentrations [8–11]. Even more worrying is the fact that certain
PAEs can be easily degraded in the environment by bacteria and fungi
and their degradation products can also have an important toxicity. Such
is the case of DEHP that can be degraded to DBP, DEP, and especially to
mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), which has shown to be more toxic
than DEHP [12, 13] (see Figure 1.2). As a result of the high human expo-
sure to PAEs and their metabolites, their potential risks for health and
their persistence, several organizations have established an increasingly
broad and restrictive legislation. As examples, the European Union has
Phthalates Microextraction From Water 3
O
R1
O
O
R2
O
DMEP O O
Di(2-methoxyethyl) phthalate
Dipropyl phthalate DPP
Figure 1.1 The chemical structures of PAEs. Adapted from [1]. PAEs, phthalic acid esters.
O
O
O
DEHP
β-oxidation
De-esterification
β-oxidation
O
O O
O
O
OH O
MEHP O
DBP
β-oxidation
De-esterification
O
cation
terifi O
D e-es
ion O
ficat
steri
OH De - e O
DEP
O
O Trans-esterification
OH Trans-esterification
PA Trans-esterification Trans-esterification
Figure 1.2 DEHP biodegradation pathways to obtain MEHP, DBP, and DEP. Reprinted
from [14] with permission from Elsevier. DBP, dibutyl phthalate; DEHP, di-2-ethylhexyl
phthalate; DEP, diethyl phthalate; MEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; PA, polyacrylate.
established limits of 6 µg/L and 400 µg/L for DEHP and di(2-ethylhexyl)
adipate (DEHA) in drinking water, respectively [17], while this maximum
allowed concentration has been established in 8 µg/L for DEHP by the
World Health Organization [18] and in 1.3 µg/L in surface waters by the
European Union [19]. Considering all the above mentioned, it is clear that
there is an increasing need to develop highly sensitive and reliable analyt-
ical methods for monitoring trace amounts of PAEs in different samples
and, especially, in water.
PAEs have been analyzed in water samples using gas chromatog-
raphy (GC) coupled to flame ionization detectors (FIDs) [20], mass
Phthalates Microextraction From Water 5
SPME
DMP, DEP, Mineral, river, SPME using a GC-MS 0.0067– 87–110% at One sample A multifactor categorical [28]
DBP, BBP, industrial PDMS-DVB 0.34 0.5 and of each design was used
DEHP, port, fiber, stirring µg/L 2.5 µg/L water were for optimization
and sewage, and at 100°C in DI analyzed purposes. PDMS-DVB
DNOP waste waters mode for 20 min, and fiber showed higher
(10 mL) and desorption contained extraction efficiency
at 270°C for all PAEs at than PDMS, PA, CAR-
5 min levels from PDMS and CW-DVB
0.011 to fibers for DBP, BBP,
6.17 µg/L and DNOP, but CAR-
PDMS for DMP and
DEP, and PA for DEHP.
DI-SPME provided
better sensitivity than
HS mode
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
7
8
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DEHA, DMP, Mineral water SPME using a GC-MS - - Eleven samples PDMS-DVB fiber showed [21]
DEP, BBP, (10 mL plus PDMS-DVB were higher extraction
DIBP, 10 or 30% fiber, stirring at analyzed efficiency than PDMS
DBP, w/v NaCl) 90°C in DI mode and residues and DVB-CAR-PDMS
DHXP, for 60 min, and of DEP, fibers
DEHP, desorption at DIBP, DBP,
and 270–280°C for and DEHP
DNOP 5 min were found
at levels
from 0.052
to 1.72 µg/L
DPP, DBP, Mineral and tap SPME using a GC-FID 0.17–0.33 90–113% at Three mineral - [40]
Applied Water Science Volume 1
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DMP, DEP, Mineral, SPME using a MIP GC-MS 0.0072– 94.54– One sample DBP was used as the [45]
DBP, tap and fiber, stirring at 0.069 105.34% of each template molecule. MIP
DAP, and reservoir 60°C in DI mode µg/L water were fiber showed higher
DNOP waters (12 for 30 min, and analyzed extraction efficiency
mL plus 10% desorption at and than a non-imprinted
w/v NaCl) 250°C for 10 min contained polymer fiber, and
at least 2 PDMS, PA and
PAEs at CW-DVB fibers
levels from
0.07 to 0.53
µg/L
DMP, DEP, Water (5 mL SPME using a PA GC-MS 0.007– - Six samples PA fiber showed higher [95]
DBP, BBP, plus 6% w/v fiber, stirring 0.027 were extraction efficiency
DEHP, NaCl) at room µg/L analyzed than PDMS fiber. Urine
DINP, and temperature in and was also analyzed
DNOP DI mode for contained
50 min, and at least 2
desorption at PAEs at
270°C for 2 min levels from
0.4 to 78.8
µg/L
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
9
10
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DIBP, DBP, River and SPME using GC-MS 0.013– 61.9–87.1% One sample Bamboo charcoal fiber [47]
BMPP, tap waters a bamboo 0.067 at 0.1, of each showed greater
DNPP, (- mL) charcoal fiber, µg/L 0.5, and water were extraction efficiency
DHXP, stirring at room 1 µg/L analyzed than PDMS, PDMS-
BBP, temperature in and no DVB and PA fibers for
DCHP, DI mode for residues DNOP and DINP, but
DEHP, 20 min, and were lower for DIBP, DBP,
DIPP, desorption at detected and DNPP
DNOP, 280°C for 10 min
and DINP
Applied Water Science Volume 1
DBP, DIBP, Mineral water SPME using a GC-FID, 0.17–0.40 86–107% at One sample TiO2 NPs fiber showed better [39]
BBP, and (9 mL plus TiO2 NPs fiber, GC-MS µg/L 2 µg/L was extraction efficiency than
DEHP 20% w/v stirring at 30°C analyzed PDMS and poly(3,4-
NaCl) in DI mode for and ethylenedioxythiophene)-
75 min, and residues TiO2 fibers. DI-SPME
desorption at of DIBP provided better sensitivity
285°C for 5 min and DEHP than HS mode
were found
at 1.0 and
2.2 µg/L,
respectively
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DMP, DEP, Mineral, river SPME using a GC-FID 0.033– 79.62– One sample SiO2-PDMS-MWCNTs [43]
DBP, and and tap SiO2-PDMS- 0.067 109.3% of each fiber showed better
DEHP waters (15 MWCNTs fiber, µg/L at 10 water were extraction efficiency
mL) stirring at 40°C µg/L analyzed than PDMS, PA and
in DI mode for and DVB-CAR-PDMS fibers
30 min, and residues of
desorption at DBP and
280°C for 2 min DEHP were
found at
5.26 and
8.47 µg/L,
respectively,
in the
mineral
water
sample
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
11
12
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DPP, DIBP, Mineral and tap SPME using a poly- GC-FID 0.10–0.25 91–115% at Three mineral NaCl and dextrose injection [42]
DBP, waters (10 o-aminophenol- µg/L 5 and 50 water solutions were also
DNPP, mL) MWCNTs fiber, µg/L samples analyzed
BBP, and stirring at 35°C and 1
DEHP in DI mode for tap water
60 min, and sample
desorption at were
280°C for 2 min analyzed
and
Applied Water Science Volume 1
contained
at least 2
PAEs at
levels from
0.3 ± 0.02
to 8.1 ±
0.19 µg/L,
except for
1 mineral
water
sample
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DBP, BBP, Tap, barreled SPME using a GC-MS/MS 0.0038- 73.4- One sample A Box-Behnken design was [41]
DEHA, drinking PS-MWCNTs 0.059 103.8% of each used for optimization
DEHP, and pond fiber, stirring µg/L at 0.05 water were purposes
and waters (10 at room and 0.2 analyzed
DNOP mL plus 15% temperature in µg/L and
w/v NaCl) DI mode for contained
60 min, and at least
desorption at 1 PAE at
280°C for 5 min levels from
0.038 ±
0.004 to
0.060 ±
0.007 µg/L
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
13
14
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DPP, DBP, Mineral, tanked SPME using a GC-FID 0.2–0.3 88–108% at One sample A central composite [20]
DEHA, and tap G-PVC fiber, µg/L 10 and of each design was used for
and waters, and stirring at 70°C 20 µg/L water were optimization purposes.
DEHP boiling in HS mode analyzed Sunflower and olive oils
water for 35 min, and and residues were also analyzed
exposed desorption at of DPP
to a PET 230°C for 4 min and DBP
container were found
Applied Water Science Volume 1
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DMP, DEP, Sea water (10 SPME using a GC-MS 0.00017– 68.0– Eleven sample Sediment was also analyzed [96]
DIBP, mL) PDMS fiber, 0.0011 114.0%, was by conventional SPE
DBP, stirring at 35°C µg/L but analyzed
DMEP, in DI mode for 55.4% and
BMPP, 40 min, and for contained
DEEP, desorption at DMP, at least 9
DNPP, 40°C for 6 min at 100 PAEs at
BBP, and 300 levels from
DHXP, µg/L 0.270 to
DBEP, 1.39 µg/L
DCHP,
DPhP,
DEHP,
DNOP,
and DINP
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
15
16
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DEP, DIBP, River, bottled SPME using a GC-µ-ECD 0.13–0.64 90.3–106% One sample Polyamide6-MnO fiber [44]
DBP, and mineral polyamide6- µg/L at 10 of each showed better extraction
BBP, and waters (4 MnO fiber, and 100 water were efficiency than PDMS
DEHP mL plus 20% stirring at 80°C µg/L analyzed fiber. Soda was also
w/v NaCl) in HS mode and residues analyzed
for 30 min, and of DEP,
desorption at DIBP and
200°C for 5 min DBP were
found at
levels from
9.24 to
29.3 µg/L,
respectively,
Applied Water Science Volume 1
in the bottle
and mineral
waters
DMP, DEHP, Tap and sea SPME using a GO-1- GC-MS 0.017–0.10 87.6– One sample GO-1-(3-aminopropyl)- [52]
DBP, water (20 (3-aminopropyl)- µg/L 101.2% of each 3-vinyl imidazolium
DNPP, mL adjusted 3-vinyl at 1 and water were bromide fiber showed
BBP, and at pH 4) imidazolium 5 µg/L analyzed, higher extraction
DNOP bromide/ and no efficiency than GO-1-
tetrafluoroborate residues (3-aminopropyl)-3-
fiber, stirring at were vinyl imidazolium
35°C in DI mode detected tetrafluoroborate, PA
for 30 min, and and CAR-PDMS fibers.
desorption at Coffee was also analyzed
175°C for 5 min
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DEP, DPP, Water (- mL SPME using a GC-FID 0.11–1.50 78.6– Three sample OH-TPB-COFs fiber [46]
DAP, plus 20% OH-TPB-COFs µg/L 101.9% were showed better extraction
DBP, w/v NaCl) fiber, stirring at 1 and analyzed efficiency than PDMS
BBP, and at 105°C in HS 5 µg/L and fiber
DEHP mode for 50 min, contained
and desorption at least 4
at 250°C for 7 PAEs at
min levels from
1.39 to 5.78
µg/L
DMP, DBP, Mineral water IT-SPME using CE-DAD, 0.59–9.83 78.8– One sample AC-PS-DVB monolithic [62]
DINP, (9 mL) AC-PS-DVB UHPLC-UV µg/L 104.6% was column showed better
DEP, BBP, monolithic at 50 analyzed, extraction efficiency
DEHP, columns, and µg/L and no than AC-poly(BMA-
DNOP, desorption with residues EDMA) monolithic
and DIDP 1.5 mL ACN were column. ACN showed
detected higher extraction
efficiency than MeOH
as desorption solvent.
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
17
18
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DMP, DEP, Disposable IT-SPME using HPLC-DAD 0.07–0.16 77–120% at One sample PDA-melamine- [23]
DAP, tableware, PDA-melamine- µg/L 10 and of each formaldehyde aerogel-
BBP, DBP, plastic cup formaldehyde 15 µg/L water were carbon-fiber tube
DNPP, and river aerogel-carbon- analyzed showed better extraction
and waters (45 fiber tube, and and efficiency than
DCHP mL plus 2% desorption with residues of melamine-formaldehyde
v/v MeOH) MeOH-water for DAP, BBP aerogel-carbon-fiber and
Applied Water Science Volume 1
(Continued)
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
SBSE
DMP, DEP, Sea and SBSE using a GC-MS 0.0003– 95–124% at One river A Plackett–Burman and [65]
DBP, BBP, esturiane PDMS stir bar, 0.063 0.1 µg/L water 2 central composite
DEHP, waters (20 stirring at room µg/L sample and designs were used
and mL plus 30% temperature for 2 estuarian for optimization
DNOP w/v NaCl 60–200 min, water purposes. 6 polycyclic
and 20% v/v and thermal samples aromatic hydrocarbons,
MeOH) desorption at were 12 polychlorinated
300°C for 10 min analyzed biphenyls and 3
and nonylphenols were also
contained analyzed
all PAEs at
levels from
0.0036 ±
0.0004 to
1.314 ±
0.018 µg/L
(Continued)
Phthalates Microextraction From Water
19
20
Table 1.1 Some examples of the application of SPME and SBSE for the analysis of PAEs in water samples. (Continued)
Matrix (sample Sample Separation Recovery Residues
PAEs amount) pretreatment technique LOQ study found Comments Reference
DMP, DEP, Sea water (25 SBSE using a GC-MS 0.00027– - No samples The stir bar coated with 150 [66]
DIBP, mL plus 5% PDMS stir bar, 1.63 were µl PDMS showed higher
DBP, w/v NaCl stirring at room µg/L analyzed extraction efficiency
DMEP, and 10% v/v temperature for than coated with 50
DMPP, MeOH) 120 min, and µL and 75 µL PDMS,
DEEP, desorption with and 150 µL PDMS over
DNPP, 200 μL MeOH carbon film. A mix
DHXP, and 50 μL ACN MeOH-ACN showed
BBP by sonication for higher extraction
DBEP, 50 min efficiency than MeOH
DCHP, and dichloromethane as
Applied Water Science Volume 1
µ-ECD, micro-electron capture detector; AC, activated carbon; ACN, acetonitrile; BBP, benzylbutyl phthalate; BMA, butyl methacrylate; BMPP, bis(4-methyl-2-pentyl)
phthalate; CAR, carboxen; CE, capillary electrophoresis; COFs, covalent organic frameworks; CW, carbowax; DAD, diode-array detector; DAP, diallyl phthalate;
DBEP, di(2-butoxyethyl) phthalate; DBP, dibutyl phthalate; DCHP, dicyclohexyl phthalate; DEEP, di(2-ethoxyethyl) phthalate; DEHA, di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate;
DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; DEP, diethyl phthalate; DHXP, dihexyl phthalate; DI, direct immersion; DIBP, diisobutyl phthalate; DIDP, diisodecyl phthalate;
DINP, diisononyl phthalate; DIPP, diisopentyl phthalate; DMEP, di(2-methoxyethyl) phthalate; DMP, dimethyl phthalate; DMPP, dimethylethyl phthalate; DNOP,
di-n-octyl phthalate; DNPP, di-n-pentyl phthalate; DPhP, diphenyl phthalate; DPP, dipropyl phthalate; DVB, divinylbenzene; EDMA, ethylene dimethacrylate; FID,
flame ionization detector; G, graphene; GC, gas chromatography; GO, graphene oxide; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; HS, headspace; IT-SPME,
in tube-solid-phase microextraction; LOQ, limit of quantification; MeOH, methanol; MIP, molecularly imprinted polymer; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry;
MS, mass spectrometry; MWCNTs, multi-walled carbon nanotubes; NPs, nanoparticles; PA, polyacrylate; PAE, phthalic acid ester; PDA, poly(dopamine); PDMS,
polydimethylsiloxane; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PPy, polypyrrole; PS, polystyrene; PVC, polyvinylchloride; SBSE, stir bar sorptive extraction; SPE, solid-
phase extraction; SPME, solid-phase microextraction; TPB, 2,4,6-triphenoxy-1,3,5-benzene; UHPLC, ultra-performance liquid chromatography; UV, ultraviolet.
Phthalates Microextraction From Water 21
industrial harbor, river, urban collector, and influent and effluent waste
water samples. As expected, the optimal SPME fiber for the extraction of
a particular phthalate depends on both the properties of the coating and
the PAEs since these compounds differ from each other in terms of polar-
ity and volatility and, therefore, on their distribution between the fiber
coating and the matrix. In addition, low-molecular PAEs are more vola-
tile than those of high-molecular weight [38]. As a result, low-molecular
PAEs would be expected to be more efficiently extracted when HS mode
is used [38]. However, they have a certain solubility in water and, as con-
sequence, they volatilize very slowly from this kind of matrices. Contrary,
although high-molecular PAEs are less volatile, they have a lower water
solubility and they volatilize faster at higher temperatures than it could be
expected [38]. Accordingly, it has been observed that DEHP and DNOP
are extracted from different water samples more efficiently than BBP, DEP,
and DMP using HS-SPME [28, 39]. Nevertheless, most of the works pub-
lished on this topic are based on DI-SPME instead of HS-SPME.
As it has already been said, the fiber coating plays a key role in the SPME
of PAEs from water samples. However, the types of commercial fibers are
still limited, which reduces their application field. In addition, under cer-
tain conditions they have low thermal and chemical stability. Furthermore,
they are fragile since they are based on fused silica supports. Consequently,
most of the subsequent studies have been focused on developing new
highly selective, efficient, inexpensive, and robust SPME fibers with con-
trollable thickness through different coating techniques. For this purpose,
a wide variety of new fibers based on the use of carbon-based nanomateri-
als [40–43], metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) [39, 44], molecular imprinted
polymers (MIPs) [45], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [46], and
bamboo charcoal [47] have been reported, among others.
The development of carbon-based coatings for stainless-steel fibers has
been an important research field as a result of the exceptional properties
these materials have, such as great chemical and thermal stability, high sur-
face area and great capacity to establish π-π interactions with the aromatic
groups of the PAEs [37, 48, 49]. Moreover, they can be easily dispersed in a
polymer matrix to obtain coatings that provide considerably better charac-
teristics than those of virgin polymers. Among them, multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (MWCNTs) have been the most used, which are large molecules
composed by numerous electronically aromatic delocalized carbon atom
layers and rolled up into a cylinder. As examples of the use of this kind of
coatings for the extraction of PAEs from water samples, Asadollahzadeh et
al. [40] made a fiber coated with an oxidized MWCNTs-polypyrrole (PPy)
composite while Behzadi et al. [42] used MWCNTs-poly-o-aminophenol,
22 Applied Water Science Volume 1
OC2H5 CF3COOH OH
C2H5O Si OC2H5 + H2O HO Si OH
OC2H5 OH
TEOS
Si O Si O Si OH OH OC2H5
n HO Si O Si OH + + C2H5O Si OC2H5
O O O +
Si O Si O Si OH n OC2H5
n
O O O MWNTs
TSO-OH TEOS
O O Si O Si O
Si O Si O Si O Si O Si O O O n
CF3COOH n n Si
O O O O
Si O Si O Si O Si O Si O O O
n O Si O Si O
O O O nO
n
THE END
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
Florence Warden was the pseudonym of Florence Alice (Price)
James.
Minor spelling inconsistencies (e.g. dinner-gong/dinner gong,
newcomer/new-comer, etc.) have been preserved.
[End of text]
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MILL
HOUSE MYSTERY ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.