Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brandsdottir and Menke (1992) Small Magma Chamber
Brandsdottir and Menke (1992) Small Magma Chamber
Brandsdottir and Menke (1992) Small Magma Chamber
RESEARCH
LETI•BRS,
VOL. 12,NUMBER24,PAGES2381-2384,
DECEMBER
24, 1992
Publisher's Note: the correct volume is 19
THINLOW-VELOCITY
ZONEWITHINTHEKRAFLACALDERA,
NE-ICELAND
ATTRIBUTED TO A SMAI,_LMAGMA CHAMBER
BryndfsBrandsd6ttir
Science
Institute,
University
of Iceland,
William H. Menke
Lamont-Doherty
Geological
Observatory
andDepartment
ofGeological
Sciences
ofColumbia
University,
Abstract. We examineseismograms
from microearth- regionabovethemagmachamber[Einarsson,1991;Tryggva-
quakes
recordedat Kraflacentralvolcano,in theNorthern son,1986;Bjtrnsson,1985;Einarsson
andBrandsdtttir,1980;
Volcanic
Zoneof Iceland,duringa shortinflationperiodin Tryggvason,
1980;BrandsdtttirandEinarsson,
1979;Bj6rns-
1988.We producerecordsections for propagation bothto the son et al., 1977].
northandto the southof the centerof the calderaby com- The Kraflacalderais situatedin thetopographicandvol-
biningseismograms from many earthquakes.The northern caniccenterof theKraflavolcanicsystem.It is approximately
recordsectioncontainsclearevidenceof a low velocityzone 10km in diameterandwasformedduringthelastinterglacial
(LVZ),includinga low amplitudediffractionof theP waveas periodbuthassincebeenffiledwithyoungereruptiveproducts
it impinges
on topof theLVZ andhighamplitude reflections [Smmundsson,
1978].Einarsson[ 1978] usedlocalearthquakes
from beneath the LVZ. The absence of clear shear waves in- recordedduringan inflationperiodin orderto delineatetwo
dicatesthatthe LVZ is at leastpartiallymoltenandshouldbe regionsof shearwave attenuation,from which he inferreda
interpretatedas a magmachamber. The magmachamberis shallowcrustalmagmareservoirat a depthof approximately
lessthan1 km thick,with a top approximately 3 km beneath 3 km nearthe centerof inflation in the caldera. This magma
the surface. We find no evidence for a LVZ in the southern chamberis smallerthanthe caldera,about2 km by 7 km, with
partof thecaldera. the long axis orientedE-W and dividednear its top (Figure
1). The southernboundaryof the magmachamberis better
Introduction definedthanthenorthernboundarybut itsmaximumdepthat
7 km is not well constrained.
Volcanismin Icelandis governed by thecomplicated inter- The datausedin this studyconsistsof about200 well-
actionbetweenthe excessive mantleupwellingat theIceland locatedmicro-earthquakes that occurredduringtheclimaxof
hotspotand rifting at the divergentplateboundary,which a shortinflationperiodin June-Ju!y1988.We installed4 dig-
is a part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge system. A major rifting ital event-triggered
ScintrexPRS4 recorders(100 samples/s)
episode hasbeenin progressin the NorthernVolcanicZone withRugbyradiotimingandthreecomponent 2 Hz geophones
(NVZ) since1975,offeringa uniqueopportunity to studyrift- (Mark ProductsL22D) within and aroundthe Kratla-caldera,
ing andmagmatismassociated with plate divergence.This at an elevation from 480 m to 580 m, in addition to the local
riftingepisodehasbeenconfinedto theKrafla volcanicsys- network which consists of 5 drum-recorders with vertical 3
tem, which is one of five NNE-e!ongatedvolcanicsystems
arranged en echelonwithinthe north-south trendingNVZ.
Theriftingactivityhasbeencharacterized byinflation/defla- 16•75oø60N
tioncycleswhichareregulated byincreasing/decreasing magma 00W
pressure in a shallowcrustalmagmachamberbeneaththe
EH
Kraflacalderaandtectonicstress attheplateboundary.Magma
accumulates withinthecalderaregionduringinflationperiods
SU
andis laterallyintrudedintothetransecting
faultswarmdur-
ingbriefdeflationperiods.During1975-1984,twentyinfla-
tion/deflation
cyclestookplacein theKraflavolcanic
system.
Nineof thesedeflationsendedin basalticfissureeruptions.
The
lastdeflation
eruption eventtookplaceinSeptember ! 984after
whichthemagmachamber inflatednormallyduringthenext
3 months, beforecomingto a haltin early1985.Therehave
sincebeenbriefperiods of inflationduringwhichincreased 65ø40N
VELOCITY. km/.•
0 8
0
I
12 •
O -'
0 ', 0 ....
I I ' 'l' ' I" •[
,q-- -0.25 0.25 0.75 •.2s •.?s •.•s -0.25
T - X/5, s
Fig.2.(left)Simple,
!-dvelocity
modelofcompressional
(bold
line)and
shear(solid
line)velocity
asafunction
ofdepth.Note
the600mthick lowv•..iocity
zone.(middle)
Synthetic
record
section
forasourceat2.8kmdepth.
(fight)
Identification
ofmajor
seismicphasesinthe•ecordsection.
Notethehigh
amplitudes
associated
withtheP• andofP?• phases.
•'•--] SUand
Ell I.•-..] SUand
EH
! VERTICAL
•',--!PdiffPb Pbrefi in.--[RADIAL /
TIME, s TIME, s
•s HF 15 HF
VERTICAL RADIAL
12 12
'• preft
9 • /
x
Fig.3.(Top)
Vertical
andradial
component
recordsections
forpropagation
tothenorth,
constructed
bycombining
earthquakes
observed
atstations
SUandEH.(Bottom)
Vertical
andradial
component
record
sections
forpropagation
tothesouth,
constructed
bycombining
earthquakes
observed
at stationHF.
Ourda'tabestconstrain
the two way verticaltraveltime finedto the regionabovethe LVZ) recordedat LH showa
through
theLVZ, whichis about0.4s.Assigning
a nominal pronounced
secondary
phasearriving0.2 s afterPt on the
compressional
wavevelocityof 3 km/sto theLVZyieldsa radialcomponent
(Figure4). Thissecondaryphaseis most
thicknessof 600 m. This thicknessestimatemustbe treated
pronouncedfor earthquakes arrivingat LH from S-SWbutis
cautiously,
sincethe actualvelocityof theLVZ is notwell presentas an indistinctarrival from other azimuths. It does
constrained
andtheeffectsof possiblethinning
of theLVZ not move out with range, and so must be associatedwith a
tothenorthhavenotbeentakenintoaccount. Nevertheless, feature
closetothestation. Wemodelthissecondary phase as
it is clearthattheLVZ is relatively
thin,perhaps
lessthan a compressional
to shearwave conversionthat occursat the
1 kin. The absenceof clear shearwavesis an indicationthat baseof a surficial
lowvelocitylayerabout500m thickwitha
theLVZisatleastpartially molten,andshould beinterpretedcompressional velocity
of 2 km/s.Sucha lowvelocityregion
asa magmachamber. wasdetectedinthecenterof thecaldera
byAmott[1990].We
Thesouthern record sectionhasa dearPt andfairlyclear interpret
thislow velocityzoneasdueto hydrothermal alter-
St outto a rangeof at least7.5 km. Wefindnoevidence for ationoftherock.TheSt shear wavephase isclearlyseenon
aLVZ in thesouthern partof thecaldera.
However, sincewe theseseismograms,
indicating
thattheshearattenuation
is not
havenodatafor ranges greaterthan7.5kin, we cannotrule sohighastocompletely
removethisphase.
outthepossibility
of a deep(>4 km)magma chamber.
Indeed,
Conclusions
andimplications
a reversely
polarized phasearriving0.1safterPt (Figure3,
bottom)
atarange
of6-7.5kmmight
possibly
bep•,•'tfrom Seismogramsfrom stationsnorth of the Krafla caldera
sucha deepmagmachamber. showsecondary
arrivalsassociated
with reflectionsandre-
fractions
fromthebottomof a low velocityzone,whichwe
Converted
shearphasefroma surface
low-velocity
layer interpret
asa shallow
magma chamber. Thetwo-way travel
at theLeirhnjdkurgeothermal
field timeofthecompressional
wavethrgugh thismagma chamber
is about
0.4s, suggesting
thatit is a relatively
thinfeature,
High-temperature geothermalregions
in Icelandexistin nomorethan1 kmthickandperhaps asthinas600m. This
association
with activevolcanicsystems
wheretheyaresus- thinmagma chamber
islocatedinthecentral-northern
partof
tained
byrepeated
intrusive
activity.Surface
geothermal
ac- theKrafla
caldera.
Thereis a steep,
positive
velocity
gradi-
tivitywithintheKraflacalderais mostintensearoundLeir- entbeneaththelow velocityzone,butwe cannotconstrain
its
hnjdkur
(LH in Figure1) andaroundtheKraflapower plant properties
inanydetail. Wefindnoevidence foralowvelocity
(KR).A large,lowresistivity
bodyoccursin theuppermostzonein thesouthernpartof thecalderabutourdatadonotrule
700m in thecentral
partof thecalderaandisunderlain by outthepossibility
of a deeper(> 4kin)magmachamber there.
abodyof higherresistivity
[Steffinsson,
1981].Earthquakes TheKraflamagma chamber isfundamentally
different
in
withrangesbetween1 and4 km (i.e.raypathsentirely
con- shapefromtheonenear9øNontheEastPacific Rise(EPR)
2384 Brandsd6ttirandMenIce:Thin low-velocityzone
LH-VERT1CAL LH-RADIAL
Bj6rnsson,
A., Dynamicsof crustalriftingin NE Iceland,J,
Geophys.Res.,90, !0.151-10.162, 1985.
Brandsd6ttir,
B., andP.Einarsson,
Seismicactivityassociated
with the September1977 deflationof the Krafla central
volcano
in NE-Iceland,
J. Volcanol.
andGeotherm.
Res.,
6, 197-212, 1979.
Einarsson,P., Earthquakes
andpresent-day tectonismin Ice-
land, Tectonophysics,
189,261-279, !991.
Einarsson, P., S-wave shadowsin the Krafla caldera in NE-
010 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Iceland,evidencefor a magmachamberin the crest,Bull.
TIME. s Volcanol.,41, !-9, 1978.
forearthquakes Einarsson,P.,andB. Brandsd6ttir,Seismological
Fig. 4. (Top)Verticalandradialseismograms evidencefor
inthedistance rangeof 1-4kin,observed
onstation
LH, which a lateralmagmaintrusionduringthe July 1978 deflation
is in theLeirhnjfikur
hightemperaturegeothermal
fieldin the of the Krafla volcanoin NE-Iceland,J. Geophys.,47, 160-
centerof thecaldera.The second prominent phase,labeled 165, !980.
P=•S, is interpretedas a compressionalto shearwave con- Klein,F. W., HypocenterlocationprogramHYPOINVERSE,
versionat the baseof surficiallow velocityzone. (Bottom) U.S.Geol. Surv.Open-fileRep.,78-694, 113pp., 1978.
Verticalandradialsyntheticseismograms at a rangeof 3 km Malone, S. D., Volcanicearthquakes:
ExamplesfromMount
for a 1-d modelwith a 500 m thicklow velocityzone. St. Helens, in Earthquakes: Observation,Theoryand
Interpretation,LXXXV Corso. Soc. Italiana de Fisica,
Bologna,Italy,pp. 435-455, 1983.
[Tooracye• al., !990; Veraet al., !990], althoughbothare Minakami,T, Seismology of volcanoesin Japan,in Physical
emplacedshallowin thecrustat divergent plateboundaries VoIcanology:Developmentin solid earth geophysics 6,
andbothmaybe steadystate.TheEPR magmachamberis editedby L. P. Civetta,P. Gasparini,G. LuongoandA.
elongated alongtheridgeaxis,whereas S-wavepropagation Rapolla,pp. 1-27,Elsevier,!974.
acrossthe volcanicrift zonesin Icelandprecludes the exis- Sanford,A. R., and E Einarsson,Magma chambersin rifts,
tanceof largescalemagmabodiesatshallowlevels[Sanford in Continentaland Oceanicrifts editedby G. P/dmason,
and Einarsson,1982]. However,the overburdenpressureon AGU/GSA Geodynamics SeriesVolume8, pp. 147-168,
bothmagmachambers is similar,m 80 MPa for Kraflaand 1982.
• 70 MPa for EPR. The overburden pressureis one of the Stefiinsson,V., The Krafla geothermalfield, NortheastIce-
physicalfactorsthatdetermine theboyancyequilibriumof the land. in GeothermalSystems:Principlesand casehisto-
upwellingmagmaandthusthemagmachamber depth. ries editedby L. RybachandL. Muffler, JohnWiley and
Centralvolcanos in Icelandmayhavesmalllocalizedmagma Sons,New York,pp. 273-294,1981.
chambers,which are smaller in diameterthan their circular Saemundsson, K., Fissure swarms and central volcasnoesof
calderas.The moltenzone at the EPR seemsto be very thin, the neovolcaniczones of Iceland, in Crustal evolutionin
perhaps
lessthan100m thick,whiletheKraflamagmacham- northwestern Britain and adjacentregions,editedby D.
ber is 5- !0 time thicker.The greaterthicknessof Krafla - and
R. BowensandB. E. Leake,SeelHousePress,Liverpool,
hencegreatermagmavolume- mayimplythattheresidence England,pp. 415432, 1978.
timeof magmain the Krafla magmachamberis muchlonger Toomey,D., G. Purdy,S. Solomon,andW. Wilcox,Thethree
thanat the EPR. Longerresidence timesmaypartlyexplain dimensional seismicvelocitystructureof the EastPacific
whyhighlyevolvedsi!icicmagmas(leadingto rhyoliticvol- Rise near latitude 9ø30'N, Nature, 347, 639-644, 1990.
canism)are foundat Krafla butnot alongtheEPR. Tryggvason, E., Subsidence eventsin the Krafla area,North
Iceland,1975-1979.J. Geophys.• 47, 141-153,1980.
Acknowledgments.This researchwas supportedby the US Tryggvason, E., Multiplemagmareservoirs in a rift zonevol-
andIcelandicNationalScienceFoundations
andtheFulbright cano:Grounddeformation midmagmatransport duringthe
Foundation. WethankJ6n.&rmann P6tursson in Reynihl[g September 1984eruptionof Krafla,Iceland,J. Volcanol.
for hishospitalityandgeneroussupportduringthefield work. and Geotherm.Res., 28, 144, 1986.
Insightfulcomments by PfdlEinarssonandtwo anonymous Vera,E., J. Mutter,P.Buhl, J. Orcutt,A. Harding,M. Kappus,
reviewersimprovedthe manuscript. Lamont-Doherty Contri- R. Detrick, and T. Brother, The structureof 0 to 0.2 m.y.
bution Number 5019.
old oceaniccrustat 9 degrees North on theEastPacific
Risefromexpanded spread profiles,J. Geophys. Res.,95,
References 15.529-15.556, 1990.
Amott, S. K., A seismicstudyof the Krafla volcanicsystem,
Iceland. Ph.D. theses,,283 pp., Universityof Durham, Brynds Brandsd6ttir,
ScienceInstituteof the Universityof
November 1990. IcelandDunhaga
5, 107Reykjav!'k,
Iceland.
Armannsson,
H., .4.. Gugmundsson,
andB. S. Steingrfms- WilliamMenke,Lamont-Doherty
Geological
Observatory
and
son,Explorationanddevelopment
of theKraflageothermal Department
of Geological
Sciences
of ColumbiaUniver-
area, JOkull,37, 13-30, 1987. sity,PalisadesNY10964, USA.
Bj6rnsson,
A., K. Sa•mundsson, P.Einarsson,E. Tryggvason,
andK. Gr6nvold,Currentriftingepisodein NorthIceland, ReceivedAugust8, 1992;
Nature,266,318-323,1977. acceptedOctober22, 1992.