Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Challenges and Opportunities For Chinese Agriculture Feeding Many While Protecting The Environment 1St Ed Edition Wensheng Chen Full Chapter PDF
Challenges and Opportunities For Chinese Agriculture Feeding Many While Protecting The Environment 1St Ed Edition Wensheng Chen Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/family-business-in-china-
volume-2-challenges-and-opportunities-1st-edition-chen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/cross-cultural-experiences-of-
chinese-immigrant-mothers-in-canada-challenges-and-opportunities-
for-schooling-1st-ed-edition-xiaohong-chi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/beyond-official-development-
assistance-chinese-development-cooperation-and-african-
agriculture-1st-ed-2020-edition-lu-jiang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/doing-business-in-chile-and-peru-
challenges-and-opportunities-1st-ed-2020-edition-john-e-spillan/
Oil and Oilseed Processing: Opportunities and
Challenges Tomás Lafarga
https://ebookmass.com/product/oil-and-oilseed-processing-
opportunities-and-challenges-tomas-lafarga/
https://ebookmass.com/product/herbal-bioactive-based-drug-
delivery-systems-challenges-and-opportunities-inderbir-singh-
bakshi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-cloud-to-thing-continuum-
opportunities-and-challenges-in-cloud-fog-and-edge-computing-1st-
ed-edition-theo-lynn/
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-management-strategic-
opportunities-and-cultural-challenges/
https://ebookmass.com/product/blockchain-in-the-global-south-
opportunities-and-challenges-for-businesses-and-societies-nir-
kshetri/
CHINA AND GLOBALIZATION 2.0
Wensheng Chen
Translated by
Guofeng Zheng
China and Globalization 2.0
Series Editor
Bai Gao
Department of Sociology
Duke University
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
China is now at the forefront of globalization, particularly with the One
Belt, One Road policy. What does a Chinese globalization look like,
though? This series will explore the distinct legacies and evolutions of
China’s worldview, even as China exports its development model to coun-
tries around the world.
Challenges and
Opportunities for
Chinese Agriculture
Feeding Many While Protecting the Environment
Wensheng Chen
Institute of Rural Development Research
Changsha, Hunan, China
Translated by
Guofeng Zheng
East China University of Science and Technology
Shanghai, China
Published with the financial support of the Chinese Fund for the Humanities and
Social Sciences
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub-
lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the
material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
Prologue I
v
vi PROLOGUE I
Xiwen Chen1
1
Xiwen Chen, Deputy Head of the CPC Central Leading Group for Rural Work, Director
of the Office.
Prologue II
The Chinese economy completed its leap of the Lewis transition zone
from 2004 to 2010, which is a milestone in China’s economic develop-
ment. After a country’s economy leaps across the Lewis turning point, the
labor marginal productivity of agriculture is no longer zero, and the rela-
tive scarcity of capital and labor as well as the relative price relationship will
have fundamental changes. This change is manifested in agricultural pro-
duction as the economic phenomenon of the substitution of labor by capi-
tal, leading to the start of a decrease of the marginal rate of return of
capital. In the constant production function, the decrease of capital returns
means the country’s economic growth declines. However, if the produc-
tion function changes, it can still maintain a relatively high economic
growth rate, and indeed to change the production function is to change
the growth mode of the economy. Under the constraint of the inevitable
return on capital, increasing labor productivity is the key to maintaining
the return on investment. In general, there are many ways to increase
labor productivity, including replacing labor with machines, improving
the proficiency of workers, adopting more efficient technologies and
crafts, and improving the efficiency of the allocation of production factors.
With the large outflow of rural labor from the agricultural fields, the
resource endowment structure of agricultural production changes, leading
to mutual replacement and further reversal among agricultural production
elements. The organization method of the substitution of capital by labor
in traditional agricultural production has gradually been replaced by the
substitution of labor by capital, thus forming an advancement of induced
technology development. However, in the process of agricultural
xi
xii PROLOGUE II
production, if the capital inflow does not expand along with the corre-
sponding expansion of production scale, the substitution of labor by capi-
tal will lead to a waste of resources in the production process. Farmer
households are the basic agricultural production units formed in the rural
economic reform more than 30 years ago. Farmer households obtained
equal rights to cultivate land from village collectives through a contract by
means of rural resident rights. The land lease contract stipulates the rights
and responsibilities between a farmer household, village collectives, and
countries, and thus establishes an agricultural production system based on
small farmer households. However, with the development of industrializa-
tion and urbanization, the labor force continues to flow out of households
that have productive capability, which leads to the gradual degradation of
the productive capacity of farmer households. At the same time, by shar-
ing the results of industrialization, laborers entering the non-agricultural
field obtain higher rewards than in the agricultural field, resulting in par-
tial capital flowing into rural and agriculture fields. On the one hand, the
outflow of labor causes a decline in production capacity of farmer house-
holds. On the other hand, capital flows from urban and non-agriculture
fields into rural areas, which reduces the opportunity cost of capital use,
and thereby stimulates the enthusiasm of farmer households to purchase
agricultural machinery, pesticides, herbicides, and other agricultural
investment resources. The existing research shows that under the condi-
tion of unchanged agricultural production scale, the biggest impact on the
income elasticity of crop production is the cash input of production. The
substitution of labor by capital in the agricultural production of out-of-
town households is higher than those who do not have out-of-town labor.
The labor loss caused by labor migration and the increase of non-agricul-
ture income levels will encourage farmers to carry out extensive operations
on agriculture. The inflow of remittances can help farmers use more pro-
duction factors such as pesticides and fertilizers, thus increasing the pos-
sibility of pollution in agricultural production. Some scholars have found
that although farmer households whose family members go out to work
can purchase more and more advanced means of production, the inflow of
remittances has led to “slack” behavior of other family members.
Industrialization and urbanization put forward internal requirements for
agricultural modernization. The pollution of agricultural production and
the waste of resources are contained in the unbalanced organization of its
factor allocation.
PROLOGUE II xiii
efficiency of farmland, and will ensure that the income of large family
farming businesses is on the same planting scale as that of urban residents.
After the implementation of land circulation and large-scale operation,
social division of labor and specialized production have naturally expanded,
forming a series of specialized production bases, which have laid the foun-
dation for increasing investment in sci-tech, standardized production, eco-
logical production, and agricultural marketization. In practice, we found
that with the expansion of the scale of agriculture operations, farmers’
demand for fertilization technology, improved crop varieties, cultivation
techniques, and use of agricultural machinery increased. The greater the
scale of agricultural production and operation, the higher the demand for
agro-technology information, and the more controllable the sources of
pollution will be, such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and plastic films.
It can be seen that the scale operation of agriculture implies the develop-
ment trend of “resource and ecologically sound”.
Professor Wensheng Chen, who grew up in local communities, is the
chief editor of the Journal of Chinese Rural Discovery, a brand magazine
for issues related to “agriculture, rural areas, and farmers”. Challenges and
Opportunities for Chinese Agriculture is the outcome of “The Research of
the Transformation of Agricultural Development Model in the
Construction of ‘Resource and Ecologically Sound Society’”, a post-
funded project by the National Social Science Fund of China. Based on
the relevant theoretical research and practice of agricultural development
mode in China and abroad, the book focuses on the development of
China’s agriculture in the construction of a “resource and ecologically
sound society” based on the characteristics of agricultural resources and
environment, as well as multiple goals of developmental transformation of
Chinese agriculture under the constraints of resources and environment.
It also focuses on the research of agro-scientific and technological innova-
tion as the core power to accelerate the transformation of resource utiliza-
tion methods, and building an agricultural production system oriented by
the “resource and ecologically sound agriculture” so as to accelerate the
transformation of the agriculture socialization service system by using
rural informatization as a breakthrough. As a method of accelerating the
institutional innovation of agriculture, “resource and ecologically sound”
development is used to guarantee the accelerated transformation of an
agricultural development mode. The book is intended to explore the the-
ory and practice of accelerating the transformation of China’s agricultural
development mode with multiple goals, providing strategic direction of
PROLOGUE II xv
Fang Cai1
1
Fang Cai, Member of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Vice President.
Contents
1 Prolegomenon 1
1 Research Questions 1
2 Main Questions and Content 11
xvii
xviii CONTENTS
Bibliography511
List of Figures
xxi
List of Tables
xxiii
xxiv LIST OF TABLES
Prolegomenon
1
Zhu, Youzhi, Chen, Wensheng. National Food Safety Must Address New Challenges in
the New Era [N], Guangming Daily, 05-25-2013.
2
Chen, Wensheng. The Transformation of National Economy Must Start from
Breakthroughs in Agriculture, Rural Areas and Farmers [N], Guangming Daily, July
13, 2010.
3
Patel, Raj. Stuffed and Starved: Markets, Power and the Hidden Battle for the World Food
System [M], (Trans.) Guo, Guoxi and Cheng Jianfeng, Beijing: Oriental Press, 2008.
1 PROLEGOMENON 3
4
Data sources: Xu, Lianzhong. “Nine Successive Increases” in Grain Yield and Prices [J],
Seeking Knowledge, 2001 (3); Farmers’ Income Growth Rate Surpasses That of Urban
Residents Again [N], Farmers’ Daily, January 21, 2013.
5
Nine Successive Increases in Grain Yield Sets Up a Chinese Benchmark for the World
[N], People’s Daily (Overseas Edition), December 3, 2012.
6
Chen, Xiwen. China Must Have a Global Vison in Addressing Food Issues (A Speech
Made on 2012 China Agricultural Development Forum at China Agricultural University)
[J], Journal of Chinese Rural Discovery, 2012 (4).
4 W. CHEN
7
He, Chuanqi. China Modernization Report 2012: A Study of Agricultural Modernization
[M], Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012.
8
Ibid.
9
Cheng, Guoqiang, Entry into WTO and China’s Agricultural Development: China’s
Agricultural Globalization in the Past 10 Years [N], China Economic Times, November 23, 2011.
10
Jiang, Changyun, Accelerate the Transformation of Agricultural Development Mode
[J], China Development Observation, 2012 (5).
1 PROLEGOMENON 5
11
Suggestions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Formulating
the Eleventh Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development [M], Beijing:
People’s Publishing House, 2005.
6 W. CHEN
15
The Compilation of Documents of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of
China [M], Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2012.
8 W. CHEN
16
Gao, Fusheng, “Low-Carbon” Is Significant for “Mode Transformation” in Agriculture
[N], China Special Native Product, May 12, 2010.
17
Zhu, Jianhong, China’s Set Target for Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions: China
Takes an Active Role in Coping with Climate Changes [N], People’s Daily, November
27, 2009.
10 W. CHEN
18
Outline of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of
the People’s Republic of China [M], Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2011.
1 PROLEGOMENON 11
1
Tang, Zhong & Sun, Taosheng. On Agricultural Growth Mode [J], Xinjiang State
Farms Economy, 1998 (01).
2
Wu, Fangwei. The Key to Increase and Key Increase: Again on Agricultural Growth
Mode Transformation, Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2009, (12).
quality and high efficiency, ecological protection, and safety. Then why
should we transform agricultural development mode?3 What are the con-
notations? Is the transformation of agricultural development mode endog-
enous or exogenous? What are the constraints? These are timely topics
that urgently need to be explored before China realizes modern transfor-
mation in agriculture.
Domestic scholars generally believe that the agricultural development
mode refers to the methods, means, and patterns to realize agricultural
development. Transforming the agricultural development mode is to
improve the quality of agricultural development. Mainly through tech-
nological innovations and based on optimizing the structure, improving
efficiency, reducing energy consumption, and protecting the environ-
ment, it will achieve comprehensive and coordinated development,
which means the coordination of speed, quality, and efficiency; the coor-
dination of investment and consumption exports; the coordination of
population, resources, and environment; and the coordination of eco-
nomic and social development.4 In developed countries, the main goals
of agricultural modernization are commercialization and marketization,
with the aim of improving agricultural labor productivity. This kind of
development mode improves agricultural labor productivity through
technological progress and institutional innovations, but there are also a
series of problems such as food safety and environmental pollution. The
transformation of agricultural development mode is not only an issue of
efficiency, but also a game equilibrium of multiple objectives such as
efficiency, environmental protection, and safety. The transformation of
agricultural development mode refers to agricultural development fac-
tors, development mechanism, development path, and a series of struc-
tural changes. It mainly includes “the changes of input factors based on
technological progress, the changes of growth mechanism based on agri-
cultural market system, the changes in the path selection of resources
and environment constraints. Meanwhile, it also includes structural
changes such as farm products structure, consumption structure, income
structure, market structure and institutional structure, with a view to
3
The Compilation of Documents of the Third Plenary Meeting of the 17th Central Committee
of the Communist Party of China [M], Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2008.
4
Tang, Sihang & Han, Xiaoqin. Changes of the Agricultural Developing Mode Is the Key
of Modern Agricultural development [J]. Social Sciences of Beijing, 2010 (2).
2 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT MODE: RELEVANT THEORETICAL… 19
For a long time, the neoclassical production functions have been used to
describe agricultural productive relations. The increase of farm products,
that is, the development of agriculture, is the result of maximizing the
specific input portfolio. As the input of a certain production factor
increases, the production function increases from an increasing rate to a
decreasing rate until the function reaches its maximum value and begins to
decline. The increase of variable input leads to a decrease of the total out-
put. Put simply, output is a function of all the elements, namely p=f (a, b,
c …). The meaning can be expressed as follows: If the number of inputs
changes, then the number of outputs will change with it. In addition, the
change mode has some features6 from which can be seen the change of
production mode. Following the requirements of the neoclassical three-
stage production function, the key to agricultural development is to
increase the input of the elements. This production function, which raises
production by increasing input, obscures the relationship between pro-
ductive knowledge, production function, and technical efficiency. This
problem wasn’t solved until the publication of Sune Carlson’s Pure Theory
of Production in 1939. In the production theory, research methods that
directly consider production methods rather than “putting it in the pro-
duction function” have arisen, making the relationship prominent. These
new methods include linear models of production and extended forms of
5
Zeng, Fusheng & Kuang, Yuanpei. Develop Modern Agriculture and Advance the
Transition of the Development Mode of Agricultural Economy [J]. Science & Technology and
Economy, 2010 (4).
6
Wicksteed, P.H. (1894) An Essay on the Co-ordination of the Laws of Distribution [EB/
OL], Macmillan & Co., London. At http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/texts/wicksteed/
wickess.pdf
20 W. CHEN
7
Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior [M],
(Trans.) Wang, Jianhua & Gu, Weilin. Beijing: Science Press, 1963; Koopmans,
T. C. Economics among the Sciences [J], The American Economic Review, 69, pp. 1–13.
8
Arrow, K. J. & Debrue G. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy [J],
Econometrica, 22 (1954): pp. 265–290.
2 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT MODE: RELEVANT THEORETICAL… 21
structure are considered as the basic elements of the production set attri-
butes. In general equilibrium theory, technology is still exogenous or
given. In the “input—output” combination, technology is the bond of
various input elements, and the change comes from the artificial setting.
Technology isn’t considered as a new element in economic development
until the Solomon remainder, thereby incorporating technological prog-
ress into the theory of economic growth and pushing the production
function theory into a new stage.9
The traditional agricultural development in China mainly depends on
increasing factor inputs. Its connotation is basically the same as that
described by the neoclassical production function. In order to ensure a
steady increase in national grain output, investment in production factors
such as land, capital, fertilizers, pesticides, and labor is continually added.
This agricultural production mode not only results in the waste of
resources, but also brings about serious pollution. The census results of
pollution sources show that agriculture is responsible for 47% of chemical
oxygen demand (COD) emissions and more than 50% of nitrogen and
phosphorus emissions. Therefore, it is an arduous task for agricultural
development to strengthen the support for material technology, improve
the utilization rate of resources, and reduce environmental pollution.10
The natural resources of China’s agricultural production have been rela-
tively scarce. The per capita farmland area is only one-third of the world
average. Along with urbanization and industrialization, roads and infra-
structural facilities continue to develop, and thus farmland is decreasing at
an annual rate of 200,000 hectares. It is estimated that per capita farmland
will decrease from 0.08 hectares to 0.06 hectares in 2020 and 0.05 hect-
ares in 2030.11 According to David Romer’s “growth drag” theory in
natural resources, Cui Yun has calculated that the “growth drag” of
China’s land resources was about 1.26 per cent annually from 1978 to
2005. That is, due to the consumption of land resources, China’s
economic growth rate dropped by an average of 1.26% annually.12 It can
9
Robert, M. S. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function [J]. The Review
of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3. (Aug., 1957), No. 1, 1956, pp. 312–320.
10
Chen, Xiwen. The Situation and Overall Thinking of Rural Reform and Development
[J], Chinese Cadres Tribune, 2009 (8).
11
Tang, Huajun et al. Land Use in China: On Cover Change [M], Beijing: China
Agricultural Scientific and technological Press, 2004.
12
Cui, Yun. An Analysis of “Drag” of Land Resources in China’s Economic Growth [J].
Economic Theory and Business Management, 2007 (11).
22 W. CHEN
13
Xu, Guangyue. The Relationship between Farmland Resources and Economic Growth:
An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data [J]. Chinese Rural Economy,
2009 (10).
14
Xiao, Xiangxiong & Liu, Hao. Research on the Innovative Mode of Farmland Operating
in Two-oriented Society [J]. China Development, 2010 (4).
15
Yang, Liping et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Nutrients Balanced Fertilization
Technique and Its Industrialization [J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2001 (4); Zeng,
Xibai & Li, Jumei. Fertilizer Application and Its Effect on Grain Production in Different
Counties of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004 (3).
2 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT MODE: RELEVANT THEORETICAL… 23
16
Gong, Qianwen et al. An Analysis of Factors Affecting Farmers’ Over-fertilization Risk
Cognition and Evasion Ability [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2010 (10).
17
Liu, Qingsong. Types and Hazards of Soil Pollution [J]. Environmental Herald,
2002 (5).
18
Zhang, Fusuo et al. Discussion on Fertilizer in an Era of Modern Agriculture [J].
Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2003 (1).
19
Ma, Defu & Liu, Xiuqing. On Agriculture and “Two-oriented Society” and “Two-
oriented Agriculture” [J]. Hubei Social Sciences, 2010 (12).
20
Li, Jun et al. Discussion on the Establishment of Safety Standards for Exporting
Vegetables and Animal-derived Foods from China [J]. China Standardization, 2003 (1).
24 W. CHEN
pesticides account for a large proportion and some banned pesticides are
still in use. Pesticides are not only used in large quantities but also in low
utilization. The utilization rate of pesticides in China is only 20%–30%,
which not only causes serious waste, but also directly endangers water and
food safety, human health, and environment.21 Is there a possible equilib-
rium between agricultural development and environmental friendliness?
Based on data from 1978 to 2009 in Jiangsu Province, Jihong Ge and
Shudong Zhou have conducted empirical analysis on the economic factors
of agricultural non-point pollution. The results show that when the scale
of agricultural economy is expanding, the proportion of aquaculture in
agriculture is increasing while the proportion of planting industry is
decreasing, the proportion of cash crops is rising while the proportion of
grain crops is declining in plantation structure, and the expansion of rural
population will increase the emission of agricultural non-point source pol-
lutants.22 However, agro-technology progress and the implementation of
the agricultural non-point pollution control policy can effectively reduce
the agricultural non-point source pollutant emissions, which shows that
the coordination of agricultural economic growth and environmental pro-
tection is achievable. Agricultural development does not mean that the
environment must be sacrificed, while environmental protection does not
necessarily mean the cost of agricultural recession. The key is to change
the current mode of agricultural development.
In the current agricultural development mode, the input of fertilizers
and pesticides has been on an upward trend since 1960 to ensure the
increase of grain output. The density of fertilizer application increased
from 7 kg/hectare in 1960 to 47.03 kg/hectare in 2008 and the propor-
tion of rural land (rural land/land area) increased from 37% in 1960 to
56% in 2008.23 This is a typical agricultural development mode that
depends on input factors. The scarcity of natural resources in agricultural
production in China is manifested not only in land resources but also in
the shortage of water resources. China’s water resources are only about
21
Fu, Zetian et al. 1998. Over-Use of Pesticide and Approaches to Reduce Pesticide
Dosage [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1998 (2).
22
Ge, Jihong & Zhou, Shudong. Economic Factors for Agricultural Non-point sources
pollution: An Analysis Based on the Data of Jiangsu Province (1978–2009), Chinese Rural
Economy, 2011 (5).
23
He, Chuanqi. China Modernization Report 2012 [M]. Beijing: Peking University
Press, 2012.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
He came to Boston seeking a publisher and found it in the Handel
and Haydn Society, which, in 1822, not only published the collection
but gave the society's name to it. It met with great success, running
through many editions. In 1826 its compiler delivered a series of
lectures in Boston churches on church music which attracted such
favorable attention that he was induced to make his home in the city.
In time he became president of the Handel and Haydn Society, and,
when the Boston Academy of Music was established, largely through
his efforts, he was put in charge of it.
1. To teach sounds before signs (have the pupil learn notes orally
first).
While in the later thirties colleges and universities were not prepared
to grant music a place in the academic curriculum, they began to
recognize it as an important element of culture, and to extend to it
their patronage. In 1838 William Robyn, a professor in St. Louis
University, formed, under the auspices of the institution, a musical
society called the 'Philharmonic' for the performance of public
concerts. These were well patronized.[57]
IV
The German immigration was in full force in the forties, cities such as
St. Louis, Cincinnati, and Milwaukee becoming the homes of great
numbers of this music-loving people. In the broad sense of the term,
they formed the greatest educational influence in music that the
country had yet received. It is said that wherever two Germans
settled in America they organized themselves into a Sängerbund.
Tyrolese and Swiss singers and bell-ringers began to tour the
country in 1840 and delighted Americans of every class—even now
they are popular in the Chautauqua circles. However, when, lured by
the success of the jodlers, really fine German bands, such as the
Steiermarkers, Gungl's band, the Saxonia and Germania, came over
in quest of American dollars, they met with consistent failure, and
were forced to dissolve—to the great benefit of American musical
education, for the individual members generally became teachers of
instrumental music in the localities where they were stranded. It was
only by playing dance music and popular airs that the bands met
with any success whatsoever. Gungl (whose 'Railroad Galop,' an
imitative composition, was the most popular in his répertoire) wrote
home to a musical journal in Berlin that music 'lies still in the cradle
here and nourishes herself on sugar-teats.'
Dr. Lowell Mason was the chief assistant at an event which marks an
epoch in American musical education, namely, the birth of the
normal musical institute from the so-called musical convention. This
occurred in 1856 at North Reading, Mass., where an annual musical
convention of the usual sort was converted into a school of a
fortnight's duration for instructing its members, particularly teachers,
in both musical theory and practice. The example was followed all
over the country to the great benefit of musical pedagogy.
Associated with Dr. Mason in this work of popularizing music was
George F. Root, who journeyed over the country conducting
conventions, lecturing, etc.[58]
V
During the second half of the nineteenth century the teaching of
music passed in large measure from the hands of single,
independent teachers into the direction of music masters associated
in institutions for class instruction, which are generally known as
conservatories, although this term in its European signification of a
large, completely equipped and nationally endowed school of music
is misleading. Indeed, the pretense seems to have been deliberate.
Dr. Frank Damrosch, in an address on 'The American Conservatory,'
before the Music Teachers' National Association at Oberlin, Ohio, in
1906, said:
VI
Henry Dike Sleeper, professor of music in Smith College, a women's
college of the first rank, has made an interesting analysis of the
character of musical instruction given in the leading universities and
colleges where the subject is taught. He says that there are four
ideals of study: