Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download Is Jesus Athene or Odysseus 1St Edition Max Whitaker Ebook Online Full Chapter PDF
Full Download Is Jesus Athene or Odysseus 1St Edition Max Whitaker Ebook Online Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmeta.com/product/marxism-is-it-science-1st-edition-
max-eastman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/house-of-odysseus-1st-edition-
claire-north/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/when-is-adultery-or-fornication-
committed-1st-edition-zacharias-tanee-fomum/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/was-jesus-a-socialist-why-this-
question-is-being-asked-again-and-why-the-answer-is-almost-
always-wrong-1st-edition-lawrence-w-reed/
Struggle and Meaning or why Reducing Suffering is the
Priority Per Sona
https://ebookmeta.com/product/struggle-and-meaning-or-why-
reducing-suffering-is-the-priority-per-sona/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/struggle-and-meaning-or-why-
reducing-suffering-is-the-priority-per-sona-2/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/a-visual-guide-to-clinical-
anatomy-1st-edition-whitaker/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-them-
truth-or-dare-3-1st-edition-adora-crooks/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/mythras-third-printing-edition-
nash-pete-whitaker-lawrence/
Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen
zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe
Herausgeber / Editor
Jörg Frey (Zürich)
Mitherausgeber/Associate Editors
Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) ∙ James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala)
Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) ∙ Janet Spittler (Charlottesville, VA)
J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC)
500
Max Whitaker
Mohr Siebeck
Max Whitaker, born 1975; 1995 BSc, 1997 MSc in mathematics from Waikato University;
1997 – 2005 working as statistician and computer programmer; 2009 BTheol from Otago Uni-
versity; 2016 PhD from Otago University; currently Priest in the parish of North Dunedin, in
the Anglican Diocese of Dunedin, New Zealand.
orcid.org/0000-0001-8842-223X
I would like to thank many people who have helped with the completion of this
work:
The University of Otago, and particularly Paul Trebilco, in the Department
of Theology and Religion, and Arlene Allan, in the Department of Classics, for
supervision, support and feedback.
Saint John’s Theological College for providing me with the time to work on
the writing process, and for providing a supportive environment in which to do
so.
To my parents, in particular my mother, Jane, for reading the draft and for
all encouragement.
Lastly for the support given by God in times of despair, for pulling me up
and giving hope, for giving me the strength to work, and the wisdom to rest.
Jesus continues to appear in my life in disguise, and it is with joy that I recog-
nise him again and again in each of the many forms he takes as he guides me,
and aids me in this work.
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... V
1 What is almost certainly the oldest original text of Mark ends at 16:8 and so does not
contain any post-resurrection appearances. This issue will be discussed in Chapter Six.
2 This possible explanation will be examined in Chapters Six and Seven.
2 Chapter 1: Once Upon a Time
There are three interlinking approaches with which I will investigate the un-
recognisability stories, which will be outlined in this chapter. The first is an
analysis of the role the unrecognisable character plays in the story. The second
is an analysis of the type of stories in which characters who take those roles
appear in disguise. The third is an analysis of the manner in which knowledge
is gained or transferred between characters in each of these types of stories.
The purpose of these methods is to identify criteria which differentiate between
the different types of stories under investigation.
By looking at a number of examples, criteria for distinguishing what I have
called “disguised hero” stories, and “disguised god” stories will be created.
Each of these sets of criteria will have two aspects. The first aspect is the struc-
ture of the story and the sequence of events common to a particular type of
story. The second aspect is the purpose of the story in the wider narrative. From
these sets of criteria some heuristics will be created to categorise stories into
different groups. The final aim is to show that stories about Jesus’ post-resur-
rection appearances where he is unrecognised can be grouped into two types
of stories.
The title of this book refers to a pair of archetypical examples of these types
of stories, and the two sorts of characters with which the book will deal.
Throughout this study the characters of Athene and Odysseus will be used as
examples of the disguised hero and the disguised god, although many other
examples will also be examined. By analysing Greco-Roman literature it will
be demonstrated that quite distinct disguised character story types can be iden-
tified.
The stories about Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances will be compared to
each of these story types. The central question of the book could therefore be
phrased thus: In the various accounts of Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances
in the canonical and apocryphal Gospels and Acts, does Jesus most resemble
Athene or Odysseus?
I will argue that, when Jesus is the main character, or the hero, of the story,
the story is written as a disguised hero story. In other stories, where the main
character of a story is no longer Jesus, but is instead one of the Apostles, Jesus
is no longer the hero, but is rather presented as a disguised god. The answer
that emerges to the question of whether Jesus is presented as a disguised god
or a disguised hero is that it depends on the role Jesus is playing, the relation-
ship he has with his disciples, and what purpose the story plays in the wider
narrative.
In the canonical Gospel accounts Jesus appears as either a disguised hero or
a disguised god, depending on the purpose of the particular passage. However,
in the apocryphal Gospels and Acts the theme of the disguised hero vanishes
and the theme of the disguised god is much more common. As well as this, in
the apocryphal works sometimes the metamorphosis is used for a purpose other
1.1 Introduction and outline 3
3Chapter Two will show how these themes are used in folklore, Chapters Three to Five will
show how these themes are prevalent in Greco-Roman literature.
4 Chapter 1: Once Upon a Time
Jedi Knight is devastated and must rethink his whole identity, and his relation-
ship to the warrior Darth Vader. In another instance the Jedi Knight is seeking
out Yoda, a legendary teacher, but instead finds himself with an annoying imp-
like creature. The imp-like creature tests the Jedi Knight, who fails these tests
of character, before the imp reveals that he himself is Yoda. In The Little Mer-
maid, both the heroine (a mermaid) and the villain (an anthropomorphic octo-
pus) undergo a form of metamorphosis and take on the form of humans, and
thus forms unrecognisable to the handsome Prince. While changing the mer-
maid into a human, the villain takes her voice, which is in fact the only sign by
which the Prince will recognise the heroine. The villain uses this sign of recog-
nition to fool the Prince into marrying her. In the film, The Ten Commandments,
Moses realises his own identity, as a Hebrew, when he is shown a piece of cloth
which was used to wrap him as a baby. 4 In Big a child is metamorphosed into
an adult, and is unrecognisable to his closest friend, until he sings a secret song
which only he could know.
The number of examples could be multiplied endlessly, but this is enough
to show that the themes of metamorphosis and unrecognisability are ones
which continue to be popular in modern works of fiction.
However, the existence of these themes in modern literature, although
demonstrating the universality of such themes, would be irrelevant if these
themes were not present in literature which existed before the stories about
Jesus were composed. The following examples illustrate that the same themes
were present in ancient literature:
1. Two warriors face off against one another outside the walls of a besieged
city. One seeks to flee, but a goddess appears to him in the form of his brother
and convinces him to stand his ground. Only when death has come does he
realise his brother was never there, and it was a goddess disguised with his
brother’s form and voice. 5
2. A goddess appears to help a young man whose father’s house is in danger.
She appears at the gate as a stranger, unrecognisable as a goddess, and he in-
vites her in, offering her hospitality.6 Later she returns in another form7 to help
plan his quest, then takes the form of the young man himself8 to recruit com-
panions. Finally, she journeys with the young man on his ship in disguise be-
fore finally vanishing and revealing her true identity.9
4 This is a creation of the film makers, which expands on the biblical story. As will be seen
in Chapter 5, the use of items left with a baby, and then found when the child is grown up, are
common signs of recognition in Greek literature.
5 Homer, Il. 22.226–299.
6 Homer, Od. 1.105–124.
7 Homer, Od. 2.267–268.
8 Homer, Od. 3.383–384.
9 Homer, Od. 3.371–372.
1.1 Introduction and outline 5
distinctive gesture, and the two people suddenly realise who he is. Only now
do they realise that the “stranger” was the very leader they had been mourning,
and that he has seemingly come back from the dead. Now they must reassess
their whole lives in light of this revelation. The people they thought were
doomed have hope, the battle they thought was lost is now won, and the rela-
tionship with the leader they thought was gone for ever is rekindled. As their
lives’ direction is reversed, so also is their physical direction, and they imme-
diately head back the way they have come with their lives changed forever. 18
2. Several of the same leader’s followers have shut themselves up in a room,
out of fear of their enemies. The leader appears to them, but in an initially
unrecognisable form.19 The followers do not immediately recognise him. How-
ever, after he has shown them some distinctive wounds, they realise who he is.
One of the followers was not there at this time and is understandably sceptical.
Upon hearing his companions talk about how the leader has returned from the
dead, and has proved his identity to them by showing the sign of his wounds,
he also insists that he must see the wounds before he will believe this story. 20
3. A follower of a new religious movement has been captured in a hostile
and foreign city. A divine being appears to a missionary, and commands him
to travel across the sea to find and save his devotee. The same divine being
appears in an unrecognisable form, disguised as the captain of a ship, and
guides the missionary across the sea before magically transporting him to the
city. The divine being then appears to the missionary as a small child, and the
missionary falls upon the ground and worships him. The divine being continues
to aid the missionary on his quest to save his fellow devotee.21
The character appearing in an unrecognisable form in all of these stories is
Jesus, and all of these stories take place after his death. The purpose of this
study is to investigate the similarities between stories such as these, and other
post-resurrection stories where Jesus appears in a changed or unrecognisable
form, the ways in which they differ from one another, and the ways in which
they are similar to unrecognisability stories from other traditions.
18 Luke 24:13–35.
19 This is not immediately obvious from reading John 20, but the reasons for this interpre-
tation will be presented in Chapter Seven.
20 John 20:19–29.
21 Acts Andr. Mth. 4–17.
1.2 Review of previous studies 7
22 Including Homer, Tragedy, Greek and Roman comedy, Old Testament passages, other
Jewish writings, the canonical Gospels, and the Apocryphal Gospels and Acts. The works con-
taining Jesus are examined in Chapters Six and Seven, and those containing other characters in
Chapters Four and Five.
23 Stith Thompson, Motif-Index of Folk-Literature, 6 vols. (Bloomington: Indiana Univer-
1928).
25 Vladimir Yakovlevich Propp, Morphology of the Folktale, trans. Laurence Scott (Austin:
literary genres. He also shows that a vast range of different sorts of metamor-
phosis take place in Greek literature. His focus is on the way metamorphosis is
used in stories, 29 rather than an attempt at explaining metamorphosis as derived
from a “myth and ritual” theory. 30 He concludes his book with a catalogue of
metamorphosis stories.
This present study investigates the unrecognisability of Jesus in his post-
resurrection appearances in the canonical and apocryphal Gospels and Acts. It
also describes the way unrecognisable Jesus stories differ within and between
these different works. As such, a range of previous studies which investigate
unrecognisability and metamorphosis in both canonical and apocryphal works
will be useful.
These works attempt to make sense of why Jesus is presented as unrecog-
nisable, or in a different form, and these will be examined now. The literature
vital for this specific question can be broken down into two approaches. The
first approach investigates the Jesus stories as metamorphosis stories, seeing
the metamorphosis as the attribute of primary interest. The main focus is on
the apocryphal Gospels and Acts, but this involves showing how these themes
also existed in and developed from the canonical Gospels. The second ap-
proach investigates the Jesus stories as disguise/recognition stories, and sees
the recognition of Jesus’ identity as the attribute of primary interest. Both of
these methods have their strengths and their limitations and these will be out-
lined briefly below, and discussed in more detail in later chapters.
29He states that his “approach is rather to suppose that the myths are primarily stories, and
that the imaginative and emotional response they evoke is not something to be distinguished
from their narrative function but a central part of it,” ibid., 6.
30 These explanations are examined and rejected. See ibid., 38–57.
31 P. J Lalleman, “Polymorphy of Christ”, in The Apocryphal Acts of John, ed. Jan N. Brem-
32 Paul Foster, “Polymorphic Christology: Its Origins and Development in Early Christian-
(2003): 41–59.
37 Terence Cave, Recognitions: A Study in Poetics (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988).
38 Liv Inglebord Lied, “Recognising the Righteous Remnant? Resurrection, Recognition,
are challenged to recognise his true identity. Thus, in these previous studies, it
is either the social status39 of Jesus which is in need of recognition, rather than
his identity (as the man Jesus), or it is the Logos which is in need of recognition,
rather than the man from Nazareth.40
Friedrich Gustav Lang sees a moment of both anagnorisis and peripeteia41
in Mark 8:27ff.42 This is the moment when the disciples recognise Jesus’ social
status, which changes the way they relate to him, and (as vs. 31 indicates) the
future direction of the plot. Craig T. McMahan compares the recognition scene
in Luke 24 to the recognition of Odysseus. He sees three recognition scenes in
Luke 24 (Luke 24:1–12; 13–35; 36–53), and concludes that they follow the
pattern of a Homeric recognition scene. 43
Kasper Bro Larsen investigates how recognition scenes are used in the Gos-
pel of John, showing similarities with Homer and other Greek literature. 44
Hitchcock identifies four recognition scenes in the Gospel of John, two before
Jesus’ resurrection, and two after his resurrection, but only sees the passages
after the resurrection as genuine recognition scenes. 45 R. Alan Culpepper takes
a broader approach, and sees anagnorisis as a motif which occurs throughout
John’s Gospel and sees the Gospel as “a series of episodes that describe at-
tempted, failed, and occasionally successful anagnorisis.” 46 Culpepper sees the
39 The phrase “social status” covers a wide range of situations: the societal position (King,
Messiah, etc.); relationships to people (father, master, slave, brother, etc.); and in the context
of stories involving non-human persons the ontological status of the person (an angel, god, etc.).
40 There are, then, two ways to look at the disguised figure of Jesus in the Gospel accounts.
The sort of disguise before the resurrection, and the sort of disguise after the resurrection. Be-
fore his resurrection people know that he is “Jesus” but are unaware of his social status. So
when Jesus asks his disciples who the people think he is (Mark 8:27; Luke 9:18; Matt 16:13),
the answer he is looking for is one of his social status (i.e. “this is the Messiah”), not his identity
(i.e. “this is Jesus”). Oddly, the crowds actually try to answer in terms of Jesus’ identity, think-
ing perhaps he is John the Baptist, or perhaps Elijah (in disguise?), thus giving an answer in
terms of Jesus’ identity. Simon Peter, on the other hand, says “the Messiah” giving an answer
in terms of Jesus’ social status. In the passages I am looking at it is the “Jesus” part of his
identity which is in need of recognition (although the recognition of this may also lead to a
recognition of his social status as well).
41 These Aristotelian terms will be discussed below (in Section 1.4.3, and then in more detail
in Chapter Four).
42 Friedrich Gustav Lang, “Kompositionsanalyse des Markusevangeliums,” ZTK 74 (1977):
1–24.
43 Craig T. McMahan, “More than Meets the ‘I’: Recognition Scenes in The Odyssey and
An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Perspectives, ed. Mark W.G. Stibbe, NTTS (New York:
Brill, 1993), 15–24.
46 R. Alan Culpepper, “The Plot of John’s Story of Jesus,” Int 49 (1995): 353.
1.3 Methodology and tools of analysis 11
signs Jesus performs throughout the Gospel of John as signs which point to-
wards Jesus’ identity. 47 Mark W. G. Stibbe also pays attention to the theme of
recognition in the Gospel of John.48 Stan Harstine pays particular attention to
the recognition of Jesus by Thomas, investigating it, in part, in light of the
recognition of Odysseus.49
Hence, these approaches suggest that Jesus’ recognition can be understood
in the same way as other recognition scenes in classical literature. They also
explain why a disguised individual is being used from a narrative viewpoint,
that is, in order for a recognition to take place. They do not, however, discuss
the issue of metamorphosis, or look at whether the recognition scene motif is
also applicable to the post-resurrection appearances in the apocryphal works.
Therefore, these approaches also do not address the question of whether Jesus
is appearing in the role of a god or a hero, which is the focus of this book.
There are a number of stories in which Jesus appears in a changed or unrec-
ognisable form after his resurrection. In this book, I examine this as the key
common factor between what otherwise seem to be quite different types of
stories, and quite different representations of Jesus. It will show that the unrec-
ognisability and metamorphosis themes have been used in two quite different
ways. In contrast to the above approaches, this book will compare Jesus’ post-
resurrection encounters to stories in which gods appear in disguise or a changed
form, as well as to disguised hero stories. Both of these ways would have been
understood by an audience familiar with Greco-Roman stories, and with folk-
lore imagery.
33 (2006): 435–47.
50 Mieke Bal, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (Toronto; Buffalo: Uni-
mark in a brick wall in Weatherfield in 2011 CE, 51 despite the fact that none of
the events, actors, location, or time are the same. It is the relationship of the
elements to one another which are stable.
The methodology of this study will utilise previous tools which have been
created to describe the structure of hero recognition scenes, but I will apply
them to a different purpose. I will adapt the tools, creating a set of criteria to
classify each narrative as a disguised hero story, a disguised god story, or nei-
ther (stories which are neither, are stories in which no disguise is present).
Despite the grouping of these stories into two groups according to a limited
number of factors, there are several ways in which the two key types of unrec-
ognisability stories differ from one another, and several ways in which they are
similar to one another. As well as this, there are several other important features
that the stories within each class share with other stories within that class. As
the stories are investigated in Chapters Four and Five, key features will be in-
vestigated in two categories: the structure of the story, and the purpose of the
story. The structure describes the way the elements of the story relate to one
another. The purpose describes why this story appears where it does, and how
it impacts on the plot of the narrative. It is from an understanding of the struc-
ture and purpose of each story type that the three tools below will be created.52
51 A plotline from the English soap opera “Coronation Street”. Dennis had been absent from
the show since 1968 and returned in the form of a homeless man.
52 This methodology shares some similarities to Formgeschichte or form-criticism (Taken
from the title of Martin Dibelius’ classic work Die Formgeschichte des Evangeliums [Tübingen:
Mohr Siebeck, 1919]), in as much as it is interested in the stories in their most basic form. The
stories have a certain form which can exist in multiple different locations, times, and with dif-
ferent characters (or portrayals of characters). See, Laurence J. McGinley, “Form Criticism of
the Synoptic Healing Narratives 1: The Principles of Form Criticism,” TS 2 (1941): 456–7. I
am not, however, making any claim that the Gospel stories examined in this study can be traced
back to some original oral form. I am, rather, examining the stories as complete units in their
finished form (or forms).
1.3 Methodology and tools of analysis 13
If the answers to the questions posed by these three tools are related in the
manner described, then the same reasoning could go in the opposite direction.
That is, if the knowledge which is to be gained by the characters is of a certain
type, then the recognition must be of a certain type, in which case the character
who is described must take on a certain role.
This implies that the type of character used in a narrative could be influenced
by the way in which the plot is to be advanced. If the plot is to be advanced by
means of the recognition itself, and this results in a reordering of the worldview,
then a hero-recognition story will be used, and in this case the disguised char-
acter will be cast in the role of the hero. If, on the other hand, the plot is ad-
vanced by an instruction being given to the hero, and there is no great reorder-
ing of the worldview, then a disguised-god story will be used, and in this case
the disguised character will be cast in the role of the divine helper.
Code: Description:
0–0–0 Hero, discovered, knowledge via recognition
0–0–1 Hero, discovered, knowledge via other means
0–1–0 Hero, revealed, knowledge via recognition
0–1–1 Hero, revealed, knowledge via other means
1–0–0 Helper, discovered, knowledge via recognition
1–0–1 Helper, discovered, knowledge via other means
1–1–0 Helper, revealed, knowledge via recognition
1–1–1 Helper, revealed, knowledge via other means
57 Strictly speaking these tools are not binary in nature and theoretically there could be some
grey area where, for instance, it is debatable whether a disguise was seen through by an observer
or deliberately cast aside by the observed. In practice however, these tools turn out to be useful
dividing lines between stories.
1.4 Concepts of analysis 15
These codes will allow stories to be classified and tabulated. If the three
questions presented in the above table were in fact independent of one another,
then one would expect an even distribution of stories in this table. However, as
it turns out, stories which contain a disguised but later identified character tend
to fall into either the 0–0–0 cell or the 1–1–1 cell.
The disguised hero Story:
The 0–0–0 cell (hero, discovered, knowledge via recognition) represents a
typical hero recognition story.
In a hero recognition story a (usually human) hero is unrecognisable for
some reason, appears to a person or people, and is subsequently recognised.
The hero’s identity is usually discovered (by other characters and/or by the
hero himself or herself) via a token or sign. The recognition tends to result in
a moment of peripeteia58 and a reappraisal of the recognising character’s world
and their place in it.
The disguised god story:
The 1–1–1 cell (helper, revealed, knowledge via other means) represents a
typical revealed god story.
In a disguised god story a (usually not-human) helper is unrecognisable in
some manner, appears to a person or people, and is subsequently recognised.
The god’s identity is usually revealed (to other characters and never to him-
self or herself) without the use of a token or sign. The recognition does not tend
to result in a moment of peripeteia, but is often accompanied by the god provid-
ing knowledge in the form of information, or the issuing of instructions, or both.
58This is moment of reversal of fortunes. See Section 1.4.3 below for a discussion on this
concept.
16 Chapter 1: Once Upon a Time
relates to the second tool in Section 1.3.1 (whether the recognition comes about
through discovery or revealing). The third section relates to the third tool
(whether new significant knowledge is gained as a result of the recognition),
and the fourth section relates to the first tool (whether the unrecognisable char-
acter is a hero or a helper).
Metamorphosis
“Metamorphosis” refers to an object or person changing into another form. 59
However, this definition is too broad and all encompassing. While some in-
stances should unambiguously be classified as metamorphosis, there is some
ambiguous ground. Taken to an extreme, any change in the world could be seen
as a form of metamorphosis as one shape or form is being replaced with another
shape or form. 60
If every natural change in the world was referred to as “metamorphosis”,
then the word would lose its meaning. 61 Strictly speaking things like aging,62
death, and illness could be seen as forms of metamorphosis. 63 “Metamorphosis”
will, therefore, only be used to refer to instances of change which are unex-
pected or go against how we know the world works.64
59 Defined as “to remodel” or “to change into another form” by Behm “µορφή” in Gerhard
Kittel, ed., Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, trans. Geoffrey William Bromiley,
vol. 4 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1964), 755; See also Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and
William Arndt, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Lit-
erature, 3rd ed (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 639 which lists two uses in the
New Testament, first “to change in a manner visible to others” (as in the Transfiguration), and
secondly “to change inwardly in fundamental character or condition” (as it is used in 2 Cor
3:18). This study is very much concentrating on the first sense of the word.
60 As noted by Richard Buxton, who says that metamorphosis could refer to “any kind of
to any kind of change, whether corporeal or non-corporeal”, ibid, 20. He also notes that psy-
chological changes could also be covered by the word, but restricts his own study to “narratives
about certain sorts of drastic, corporeal transformation, narratives mostly drawn from the area
usually called ‘mythological’”. This study will also deal with corporeal transformations, alt-
hough this still leaves some ambiguity when it comes to the forms taken by gods and other
supernatural beings, as will be discussed in Chapter Five.
62 Aging, as seen below, is a common form of “disguise”, where the lack of recognition is
due to a child growing up, or a young man reappearing as an old man, and so forth.
63 As could melting ice, digesting food, plants growing, and so forth.
64 This does still leave some grey areas since many of the transformations in Ovid’s Meta-
morphoses could be seen as “natural” in some sense, especially if they are viewed as an expla-
nation of the way the world is now (such as explanations of how various species of birds and
animals were created). This is a theme addressed at some length by Boios (See Chapter Three).
Generally excluding natural processes is a useful dividing line.
1.4 Concepts of analysis 17
The emphasis of this study will be on people changing form in some manner,
where “people” is used in a broad sense and could refer to divine or supernat-
ural beings, as well as humans. Since stories containing the metamorphosis of
people often take place in a world where animals and inanimate objects are also
metamorphosed, a study of metamorphosis in general will be necessary.
To help to remove any ambiguity due to the way terms are used in this study,
a few definitions need to be set down. This will help to distinguish between
different sorts of metamorphic events or characters.
I use the word “metamorphosis” as an umbrella term which covers the wid-
est possible range of transformation stories. This includes changes which a per-
son brings about in him or herself, such as Jupiter appearing as Diana in order
to rape a nymph; 65 changes made by one person upon another person such as
Circe changing Odysseus’ men into pigs; 66 and changes which seem to come
about due to a process with no stated causal agent such as Phaethusa and her
sisters transforming into trees as they grieve for their brother.67 The term could
also embrace the transformation of one non-personal substance into another
non-personal substance, such as the miracle at Cana where water is transformed
into wine. 68 In Chapter Two, the range of metamorphosis stories which exist in
folklore will be discussed, which will show the vast range of transformation
stories which are possible.
The transformations which will be the focus of this study will be the ones
which fall into either Type I or Type II. The transformations of Jesus, which
are of most significance for this book, fall into either Type I or II, or a mixture
of Types I and II. 70
One important issue when considering metamorphosis accounts is whether
the “metamorphosis” in question is actually a change of the shape of the per-
ceived object, rather than a change in the perception of the object by the per-
ceiver with no actual change to the perceived object itself. That is: are we deal-
ing with a real bodily change, or with an illusion, or even delusion? 71
Two examples will illustrate this difference: In The Bacchae of Euripides,
when Agave holds up her son’s severed head she thinks it to be that of a lion, 72
but as her madness recedes she realises the truth. 73 No actual transformation
has taken place to Pentheus’ body, rather the “metamorphosis” here is Agave’s
flawed perception, brought about by divine madness. On the other hand, when
Odysseus’ men are transformed into pigs in the Odyssey, 74 the transformation
is physical and not merely a delusion.
substances e.g. Type V Non-Person → Person; caused by the transformed substance itself; de-
scription: self-actualized imposed intra- personal metamorphosis (i.e. abiogenesis), Type VI
Non-Person → Person; caused by an outside force (e.g. For instance a fairy godmother creating
footmen out of mice). Metamophoses of all of these sorts exist in folklore (see Chapter 2).
70 This would include a transformation of a human into an angel or god, the transformation
of a god or angel into a human, and transformations performed by the being, or by another
divine being. A wide range of different Christological views are embraced in these categories.
71 A distinction noted by Buxton, Forms of Astonishment, 20.
72 Euripides, Bacch. 1202–1215.
73 Euripides, Bacch. 1284.
74 Homer, Od. 10.238–243.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Muscular balance, lack of, 450.
rheumatism in cattle, 544.
rheumatism in the dog, 548.
rheumatism in horse, 540.
sense tract, 21.
Musty fodder in encephalitis, 97.
Mydriatics, 331.
Myelitis, 154.
chronic, 165.
in the dog, 161.
Myosin coagulated under heat, 41.
Myxoma of the brain, 131.
Nebula, 384.
Necrotic callosities, 455.
Neoplasms of brain, 128.
of the conjunctiva, 375.
Nephritis, 219.
acute, 220.
chronic, 234.
interstitial, 225.
purulent, 228.
suppurative, 225.
treatment, 225.
tubular, 225.
Nerve, optic, inflammation of the, 440.
optic, paralysis of the, 442.
Nerves, atrophy of, 189.
Nerve trunk, pressure on, 9.
Nervous centres, respiratory, 14.
disease, diagnosis of, 2.
disease, microbes in, 2.
disease, symptoms of, 2.
disorders, diagnosis of, 12.
functional, 13.
structural, 12.
lesions, destructive, 12.
organs, irritation of, 12.
system, diseases of, 1.
Neuralgia, 184.
of ovary, 281.
Neurasthenia in pregnant ewes, 179.
Neuritis, 181.
ascendens, 441.
descendens, 441.
optic, retro-bulbar, 441.
Neurosis, 456.
Nictitans, membrana, lesions, 357.
Nigra, corpora, cysts of, 401.
Nitro-benzol poisoning, 149.
Nodules, 453.
Nose, rhythmic movements of, 68.
Nystagmus, 452.
Pachydermia, 521.
elephantiasis, 456.
Pain, insensibility to, 10.
Palpebral fissure, widened, 338.
Panic, 23.
treatment, 24.
Panophthalmitis, 390, 403, 421.
enucleation, 422.
Papilloma of spine, 176.
Papulæ, papules, 453.
Paræsthesia, 9.
Paralysis, 2, 175.
local, 4.
of ocular muscles, 450.
of the optic nerve, 442.
sensory, 9.
Paraplegia, 3.
Parturient apoplexy, 299.
Parturition collapse, 299.
fever, 299.
Parturition fever, prevention, 311.
fever, treatment, 313.
paresis, 299.
Parasites, animal, 456.
of the bladder, 259.
of the kidney, 248.
vegetable, 456.
Parasitic dermatosis, 460.
Paresis, 2.
Pasterns, moist eczema of, in the ox, 486.
Pemphigus, 507.
Pericarditis in rheumatism, 535.
Perinephritis, 230.
Perineuritis, 181.
Periodic ophthalmia, 404.
Perioöphoritis, 284.
Periostitis of orbit, 350.
Persistent arteria hyaloidea, 436.
pupillary membrane, 400.
Perspiratory centre, 16.
Phenol in urine, 198.
test for, 198.
Phlyctenæ, 454.
Phlyctenular conjunctivitis, 371.
Phosphates in rickets, 568.
in urine, 196.
in urine in osteoporosis, 587.
Phosphorus in rickets, 567.
Phymata, 455.
Phthiriasis, 460.
Phthisis bulbi, 446.
Physical properties of urine, 192.
Pigs, impetigo of, 491.
vesicular irruption in, 490.
Pilous cysts of ovary, 291.
Pimples, 453.
Pinguecula, 375.
Pitchy affection, 491.
Pituitary body, hypertrophy of, 133.
Pityriasis in dog and cat, 503.
in cattle, 503.
in horse, 501.
Pleuritic lesions in rheumatism, 535.
Plumbism, 141.
Podagra, 544.
Poisoning by aniline, 148.
by carbon disulphide, 150.
with cotton seed or cotton seed meal, 381.
by lead, 141.
by “loco”, 135.
by nitro-benzol, 149.
Poliomyelitis, 154.
Polypi of oviduct, 293.
Polyuria, of nervous origin, 8.
Pons, 16.
Prickly heat, 499.
Prolapse of the iris, 390.
Prostate, abscess of, 269.
cancer of, 278.
cysts of, 278.
hyperæmia of, 267.
hypertrophy of, 274.
tuberculosis of, 277.
Prostatic calculus, 278.
Prostatitis, acute, 267.
chronic, 271.
follicular, 268.
interstitial, 269.
Pruritus, 9.
Psammomata of the brain, 131.
Pseudo-paralysis, 4.
Psychic peculiarities, 10.
symptoms, 10.
Pterygium, 376.
Ptosis, 337, 340.
Pupil dilatation, 21.
double, 399.
occluded, 400.
Pupillary membrane, persistent, 400.
Purkinje-Sanson images, 327.
Pus in urine, 201.
Pustulæ, pustules, 454, 474.
Pustular dermatitis, contagious, 504.
Pyelitis, 231.
Pyelonephritis, 231.
Pyometra, 296.
Quittor, 515.
Rachitis, 565.
from bran, 572.
Rain rot, 489.
Rarefaction of bone, 579.
Rarefying osteitis, 579.
Rash, 453.
Recto-vesical fistula, 261.
Recurrent ophthalmia, jurisprudence, 420.
microbiology, 410.
of solipeds, 404.
Red mange, 493.
Reflex action, 5.
increased, 6.
morbid, 5.
tonic spasm, 6.
Renal calculus, 247.
parasites, 248.
pelvis, inflammation of, 231.
tumors, 248.
Respiratory tract, 21.
inhibition, 15.
nerve centers, 14.
Restiveness, 26.
Retina, detachment of the, 439.
Retinal hemorrhage, 439.
Retina, tumors of, 439.
Retinitis, 438.
Retro-bulbar abscess, 350.
optic neuritis, 441.
Rheumatism, 528.
articular in cattle, 542.
in the dog, 547.
in horse, 536.
in sheep, 545.
in swine, 545.
blood changes in, 534.
cerebro-spinal lesions in, 536.
chronic articular, in horse, 540.
heart lesions in, 534.
infection, theory of, 532.
lactic acid, theory of, 530.
muscular, in cattle, 544.
muscular, in dog, 548.
muscular, in the horse, 541.
neuropathic theory of, 531.
nodosities in, 538.
prevention and treatment of, 549.
theory of chill, 529.
Rickets, 565.
basement, stables in, 569.
confinement in, 569.
damp soils in, 569.
food experiments, 567.
infection in, 569.
lactic acid in, 568.
on poor soils, 567.
treatment of, 570.
Rimæ, 455.
Rocking hind quarters, 69.
Rodent eczema, 497.
Rouget, 460.
Rubrum, eczema, 493.
Rupture of the choroid, 403.
Sallenders, 480.
Salpingitis, 292.
Sarcoma of spine, 176.
Scabs, 454.
Scales, 454.
Scars, 455.
Sclera, ectasia (bulging) of the, 389.
inflammation of the, 389.
wounds of the, 389.
Scleroderma, 456.
Sclerosis, 5.
of spinal cord, 165.
Scorbutus, 557.
Scratches, 508.
Scurvy, 557.
Seborrhœa, 491.
of digital region, 512.
Secretions, modifications of, 7.
modified, skin, 456.
Sensory and motor tracts in brain, 14.
symptoms, 8.
Sheep, cutaneous eruptions in, 490.
eczema in, 489.
Shorts disease, 572.
Simple iritis, 395.
Sitfasts, 455.
Skin, discolorations of, 453.
diseases, diagnosis of, 458.
external causes of, 456.
internal causes of, 457.
general causes of, 456.
diseases of the, 453.
treatment of, general principles of, 461.
disease, white, 470.
gangrene of, 520.
hyperplasia of, 523.
hypertrophy, 521.
spots of, 453.
ulceration of, 520.
Softening of the brain, 84.
Solar erythema, 468.
Spasm, 4.
centre, 15.
clonic, 4.
of eyeballs, 4.
of sphincter vesicæ, 259.
paraplegic, 4.
tetanic, 4.
tonic, 4.
Spasms, 61.
general, 4.
local, 4.
Sphincter ani, centre, 21.
vesicæ, centre, 21.
Spina bifida, 171.
Spinal arteritis, 168.
caries, 172.
cord, congestion of, 153.
cord, cross hemi-section, 20.
cord, inflammation of, 154.
cord, lesions and phenomena, 22.
cord, longitudinal vertical section, 20.
hæmorrhage, 170.
hemiplegia, 3.
hyperæmia, 153.
lesions, 14.
lesions, localizations in, 20.
meningitis, 118, 160.
sclerosis, 165.
Spine, slow compression of, 175.
Squama, 454.
Squamæ in horse, 501.
Squinting, 450.
Squint, spasmodic or spastic, 451.
Staggering, 5.
Staggers, 69.
cerebral, 94.
Stalk disease, 482.
Stampede, 23.
Staphyloma, corneal, 387.
Starvation mange, 482.
Static refraction, 330.
Steatosis of the kidney, 244.
Stenosis of lachrymo-nasal duct, 355.
Stiffness, 573.
Strabismus, 450.
Streptococcic dermatitis, 512.
Streptococcus pneumoniæ equina, 397.
Stricture of the urethra, 264.
Structural alterations in glands and ducts, 456.
St. Vitus dance, 63.
Stye, 343.
Sun-stroke, 39.
Superior columns, 21.
transverse section of, 20.
Swine, eczema in, 490.
granular eruption in, 492.
Symblepharon, 339.
Symptomatic or metastatic iritis, 397.
Synechia, anterior, 392.
posterior, 392.
Syringomyelia, 178.
Ulcer, 455.
of the cornea, 385.
Ulceration of the skin, 520.
Ulcerations of nervous origin, 7.
Urachus, persistent, 261.
Urea, 197.
test for, 197.
Ureteritis, 252.
Urethral anomalies, 261.
Urethra, foreign bodies in, 264.
imperforate, 261.
injuries of, 249.
stricture of, 264.
wounds of, 262.
Urethritis, acute catarrhal, 262.
Uric acid, 197.
test for, 197.
Urinary calculus, 247.
Urinary disease, general symptoms of, 202.
Urinary organs, diseases of, 190.
Urinary secretion, 190.
nervous control of, 191.
Urine, acetone in, 198.
albumen in, 199.
bile in, 200.
blood in, 200.
casts in, 201.
chemical changes in morbid, 196.
chemical reaction of, 196.
color of morbid, 193.
consistency, 195.
creatinin in, 198.
epithelium in, 200.
glucose in, 200.
indican in, 197.
odor of morbid, 195.
opacity of morbid, 195.
oxalic acid in, 198.
pathological, 193.
phenol in, 198.
phosphates in, 196.
physical properties, 192.
purulent, 224.
pus in, 201.
Urine, sodium chloride in, 196.
specific gravity of, 195.
translucency, 194.
viscid, 195.
Urticaria, 460.
Uterine tubercle, 298.
tumors, 297.
Xanthin, 199.
Xerosis corneæ (epithelialis), 376.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
1. Added table of Contents.
2. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and
variations in spelling.
3. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings
as printed.
4. Re-indexed footnotes using numbers.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK TEXT BOOK
OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, VOLUME 3 (OF 5) ***