Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Places - Urban Spaces 1
Public Places - Urban Spaces 1
Public Places - Urban Spaces 1
An exposition of the different, but intimately related, dimensions of urban design, this book is an updated and revised version of a book originally published in 2003. Focusing neither on a limited checklist of urban design qualities nor, it is hoped, excluding important areas, it takes a holistic approach to urban design and place-making and thus provides a comprehensive overview of the subject both for those new to the subject and for those requiring a general guide. To facilitate this, it has an easily accessible structure, with self-contained and cross-referenced sections and chapters, enabling readers to dip in for specic information. The incremental layering of concepts aids those reading the book cover to cover. Urban design is seen here as a design process, in which, as in any design process, there are no right or wrong answers, only better and worse answers, the quality of which may only be known in time. It is, thus, necessary to have a continually questioning and inquisitive approach to urban design rather than a dogmatic view. The book does not seek to produce a new theory of urban design in a prescriptive fashion. Instead it expounds a broad belief in e and attitude to e urban design and place-making as important parts of urban development, renewal, management, planning and conservation processes. Synthesising and integrating ideas and theories from a wide range of sources, the book derives from a comprehensive review and reading of existing literature and research. It also draws on the authors experience teaching, researching and writing about urban design in schools of planning, urban studies, architecture and surveying.
our contention was that an urban design awareness and sensibility should inform all parts of the curriculum. The same is true of schools of architecture, property, real estate and landscape. Second, from a need to prepare undergraduate lecture modules presenting ideas, principles and concepts of urban design to support the programmes design studio teaching. Although many excellent urban design books existed, it soon became apparent that none drew from the full range of urban design thought. The writing of these modules generated the idea for the book and provided its overall structure.
Motivation
This book comes from two distinct sources. First, from a period during the 1990s when the authors worked together at the University of Nottingham on an innovative undergraduate urban planning programme. Its primary motivation was a belief that teaching urban design at the core of an interdisciplinary, creative, problem-solving discipline, planning (and other) professionals would have a more valuable learning experience and a better foundation for their future careers. Although in many schools of planning urban design is still guratively put into a box and taught by the schools single urban design specialist,
viii
Preface
perceptual, social, visual, functional and temporal. As urban design is a joined-up activity, this separation is for the purpose of clarity in exposition and analysis only. These six overlapping dimensions of urban design are the everyday substance of urban design, while the cross-cutting contexts outlined in Chapter 3 relate to and inform all the dimensions. The six dimensions and four contexts are linked and related by the conception of design as a process of problem solving. The chapters are not intended to delimit boundaries around particular areas of urban design and, instead, highlight the breadth of the subject area, with the connections between the different broad areas being made explicit. Urban design is only holistic if all areas of action e morphological, perceptual, social, visual, functional and temporal e are considered together. In Part III e Chapters 10e12 e implementation and delivery mechanisms for urban design are explored e that is, how urban design is procured, controlled and communicated, thereby stressing the nature of urban design as a process moving from theory to action. Aspiring urban designers, especially those still in education, can often produce exciting visions and design proposals for the development of urban areas and the creation of (seemingly)
wonderful public places. The qualities of such visions may seem entirely self-evident and the case for their immediate implementation overwhelming. But this is a romantic, perhaps nave, view of urban design and place-making. We live in the real world and what appears entirely rational on paper is much more difcult to achieve on the ground. Furthermore, the reality is that implementation often fails in some way. Policies and proposals drift off course. Seen differently, however, they also evolve and develop through the implementation process. Stressing that places matter most, the nal chapter brings together the various dimensions of the subject to emphasise the holistic and sustainable nature of urban design. It is important to appreciate how urban designers (primarily those in or working for the public sector, but also others) can encourage, enable and sometimes compel better quality urban design in the form of higher quality development and/or better places for people. Rather than what urban design is or should be, the focus is how decisions become outcomes (ends), and the processes (means) by which this happens.
Preface
ix
architectural and surveying (real estate) education; by a number of new urban design journals; and by a new demand from both private and public practitioners wanting to develop appropriate skills and knowledge. All urban designers, whether knowing or unknowing (see Chapter 1), need a clear understanding of how their various actions and interventions in the built environment combine to create high quality, people-friendly, vital and viable environments or, conversely, poor quality, alienating, or simply monotonous environments. As a eld of activity, urban design has been the subject of much recent attention and has secured its place among established built environment professions as a key means to address interdisciplinary concerns. In this position, it is a policy and practice-based subject, which, like architecture and planning, benets from an extensive and legitimising
theoretical underpinning. This book draws on that now extensive conceptual underpinning to present many of the key contributions aimed at benecially inuencing the overall quality and liveability of urban environments. Urban design has developed quickly and continues to evolve, even in the seven or so years since the rst edition of this book was written. It is hoped that the structure adopted by this book will continue to stand the test of time and that, over time, it will be able to incorporate other advances in thinking on the practice and process of urban design, and any omissions that e through our ignorance or lack of appreciation e we have not included. Hence, by contributing to the better understanding of good urban design, it is intended that this book will enable the design, development, enhancement and preservation of successful, sustainable and cherished places.
Part I
Chapter 1
Public Places Urban Spaces. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-85617-827-3.10001-X Copyright 2010, 2003, Matthew Carmona, Steve Tiesdell, Tim Heath & Taner Oc. Published By Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PART | I
Discussing denitions of urban design, Madanipour (1996: 93e117) identied seven areas of ambiguity:
l l
environment comes about; seen normatively, it is e or should be e the process by which better urban environments come about. Confusion comes because those in-the-know (designers) will often skip between these forms of use, but others (often social scientists) fail to make this distinction. Urban designs scope is broad. Indicating the potential scope and diversity of urban design, and attempting to sum up the remit of urban design in simple terms, Tibbalds (1988a) suggested it was Everything you can see out of the window. While this statement has a basic truth and logic, if everything can be considered to be urban design, then equally perhaps nothing is urban design (see Dagenhart & Sawicki 1994). There is, however, little value in putting boundaries around the subject. The real need is for denitions encapsulating its heart or core rather than prescribing its edge or boundary e that is, for the identication, clarication and debate of its central beliefs and activities. To explore the source of some of this confusion, urban design can be considered in terms of discipline and geographical scale. (i) Discipline In terms of discipline, it is frequently easier to say what urban design is not than precisely what it is. It is not, for example, big architecture, small-scale planning, civic beautication, urban engineering, a pattern-book subject, just visual/aesthetic in its scope, only a public sector concern, nor a narrow selfcontained discipline. Despite this, relational denitions e those dening something in relation to something else e can help us to get closer to what it is. Urban design, for example, is typically dened in terms of architecture and town planning e Gosling & Maitland (1984) described it as the common ground between these disciplines, while the UKs former Social Science Research Council located it at
. the interface between architecture, landscape architecture and town planning, drawing on the design tradition of architecture and landscape architecture, and the environmental management and social science tradition of contemporary planning. (Bentley & Butina 1991)
l l
Should it be focused at particular scales or levels? Should it focus only on the visual qualities of the urban environment or, more broadly, address the organisation and management of urban space? Should it simply be about transforming spatial arrangements or should it be about more deeply seated social and cultural relations between spaces and society? Should its focus be its product (the urban environment) or the process by which it is produced? Should it be the province of architects, planners or landscape architects? Should it be a public or private sector activity? Should it be an objectiveerational process (a science) or an expressiveesubjective process (an art)?
The rst three are concerned with the product of urban design, the last three concern urban design as a process, while the fourth concerns the producteprocess dilemma. Although Mandanipours ambiguities are deliberately presented as oppositional and mutually exclusive, it is often a matter of and/both rather than either/or. As we consciously shape and manage our built environments (Madanipour 1996: 117), urban designers are interested in and engaged with both process and its products. While, in practice, urban design is used to refer to all the products and processes of development, in a more restricted sense it means adding quality to both product and process. Another distinction that can be confusing is that between its use in a descriptive manner and its use in a normative manner. In the former, all urban development is ipso facto urban design; in the latter, only urban development of sufcient merit or quality is urban design. Thus, seen analytically, urban design is the process by which the urban
Urban design, however, is not simply an interface. It encompasses and sometimes subsumes a number of disciplines and activities: architecture, town planning, landscape architecture, surveying, property development, environmental management and protection, etc. As Cuthbert (2007: 185) observes, professions are always territorial, and, furthermore, frequently at the behest of professions, academic institutions offering education in professional areas inevitably also become territorial (see Table 1.1). Urban design is not, or should not be, a particular professional territory (see below).
Chapter | 1
Urban Design
An open system that uses individual architectural elements and ambient space as its basic vocabulary, and that is focused on social interaction and communication in the public realm.
Urban Planning
The agent of the state in controlling the production of land for the purposes of capital accumulation and social reproduction; in allocating sites for the collective consumption of social goods such as hospitals, schools and religious buildings; and in providing space for the production, circulation and eventual consumption of commodities.
Element (i) Structure (ii) Environment (iii) Resources (iv) Objectives (v) Behaviour Static human activity Three-dimensional (closed system) Materials energy design theory Social closure/physical protection Design parameters: articially controlled environments Morphology of space and form (history human activity) Four-dimensional (open system) Architecture ambient space social theory Social communication and interaction Dynamics of urban land markets Government bureaucracy The political economy of the state Systems of legitimation and communication To implement the prevailing ideology of power Dynamics of advanced capitalist societies
Despite some professions periodically making imperialist claims on the eld, urban design is typically collaborative and inter-disciplinary, involving an integrated approach and the skills and expertise of a wide range of actors. Some urban design practitioners argue that place is not e or should not be e a professional territory and that, rather than imbuing the creative task of designing urban places in the hands of a single all-knowing designer, it should be shared among many actors. Cowan (2001a: 9), for example, has asked:
. which profession is best at interpreting policy; assessing the local economy and property market; appraising a site or area in terms of land use, ecology, landscape, ground conditions, social factors, history, archaeology, urban form and transport; managing and facilitating a participative process; drafting and illustrating design principles; and programming the development process?
He contends that, while all these skills are likely to be needed in, say, producing an urban design framework or masterplan, they are rarely all embodied by a single professional. The best frameworks and masterplans are drawn up by a number of people with different skills working in collaboration. Urban designers typically work within a context of multiple clients, often with conicting interests and objectives,
developing as a consequence of multiple solutions to a problem, rather than a single solution. Indeed, many consider that the very term urban design places it too much within the purview of professional design experts engaging in self-conscious, knowing design, and prefer the more inclusive term place-making and, at a larger scale, city-making: terms suggesting it is more than just (professional) designers who create places and cities. Described as urban design many non-professionals struggle to see their role; described as place-making they can more easily envision their role and contribution. Urban design can thus be considered the self-conscious practice of knowing urban designers; place-making is the self-conscious and unself-conscious practice of everyone. An important distinction is between urban design (or place-making) as direct design (place-design) and urban design as indirect design or, more grandly, as political economy. In the latter, actors are involved in shaping the nature of place (place-shaping), through establishing policy, making investment decisions, managing space, etc., but may not themselves be involved in any conscious design process. Urban design encompasses both. George (1997) makes a similar distinction between rst-order design and second-order design. First-order design involves direct