Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contemporary Irish Popular Culture Transnationalism Regionality And Diaspora Anthony P Mcintyre full chapter pdf docx
Contemporary Irish Popular Culture Transnationalism Regionality And Diaspora Anthony P Mcintyre full chapter pdf docx
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-monstrous-feminine-in-
contemporary-japanese-popular-culture-1st-ed-edition-raechel-
dumas/
https://ebookmass.com/product/print-culture-agency-and-
regionality-in-the-hand-press-period-rachel-stenner/
https://ebookmass.com/product/rethinking-the-irish-diaspora-1st-
ed-edition-johanne-devlin-trew/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-eu-irish-defence-forces-and-
contemporary-security-jonathan-carroll/
Radio Critics and Popular Culture 1st ed. Edition Paul
Rixon
https://ebookmass.com/product/radio-critics-and-popular-
culture-1st-ed-edition-paul-rixon/
https://ebookmass.com/product/masculinities-and-manhood-in-
contemporary-irish-drama-acting-the-man-cormac-obrien/
https://ebookmass.com/product/a-companion-to-contemporary-
british-and-irish-poetry-1960-2015-wolfgang-gortschacher/
https://ebookmass.com/product/limits-and-languages-in-
contemporary-irish-womens-poetry-1st-ed-edition-daniela-theinova/
https://ebookmass.com/product/imagining-irish-suburbia-in-
literature-and-culture-1st-ed-edition-eoghan-smith/
Contemporary Irish
Popular Culture:
Transnationalism,
Regionality, and Diaspora
Anthony P. McIntyre
Contemporary Irish Popular Culture
Contemporary Irish
Popular Culture
Transnationalism, Regionality, and Diaspora
Anthony P. McIntyre
Film
University College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
For Maria and Annie
Acknowledgements
I’d like to thank all those who helped in producing this book. First, thank
you to Camille Davies, Jack Heeney and Imogen Higgins at Palgrave
Macmillan for all their support. Two anonymous reviewers provided excel-
lent suggestions that have improved the final work considerably. Valuable
feedback was also provided by audiences at several academic conferences
and seminars where I presented papers that would eventually find their
way in modified form into this book. I’d like to thank audiences and
speakers at the L’Irlande en series conference at Université Paris Ouest,
Nanterre in 2014; the Post Celtic-Tiger Irishness Symposium at Trinity
College Dublin in 2016; the Global Irish Diaspora Congress at University
College Dublin in 2017; the Sports, Media and the Cultural Industries in
Ireland Symposium at Dublin City University in 2018; and the European
Popular Culture Association Conference 2019 at the University of
Limerick.
I am sincerely grateful to Diane Negra who, throughout my time at
UCD has been an exemplary colleague and friend and who provided gen-
erous feedback throughout the development of this book. My research
with Diane and Eleanor O’Leary on aspects of Irish contemporary culture
has taken place alongside my work on this book and has informed it con-
siderably. David McKinney, Marcus Free and Colin Coulter read work in
progress at different points and offered valuable advice. Any errors within
the book are, of course, my own.
Portions of the present work have appeared in earlier publications.
Several sections in Chap. 2 develop ideas that appeared in a version origi-
nally published as McIntyre, Anthony P., “Moone Boy and the Elision of
vii
viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ix
x CONTENTS
Index251
List of Figures
xi
xii LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 6.1 The Fricker Irish mammy memes utilise Brenda Fricker’s role
as Mrs. Brown in My Left Foot, and in particular her stern
expression, connoting both the domesticity associated with
previous eras and the unglamorous ‘common sense’
of the figure 211
Fig. 6.2 Posters for the cinematic release of Philomena conflate the
Irish mammy with mobility through a white doodle on a
plain yellow background that summarises the journey taken
in the movie 229
Fig. 7.1 In “Strangers on a (Dublin) Train” emerging interpersonal
protocols of the pandemic era are recast as novel and romantic 242
CHAPTER 1
Introduction—“Fractured Movement”:
Transnationalism, Regionality, and Diaspora
in Contemporary Irish Popular Culture
at the center of social life” (3). It is this influence across multiple spheres,
as well as the adaptability of this variant of capitalism that is key to its per-
sistence, despite the notable social and financial catastrophes with which it
has come to be associated, not least the “Great Recession” of 2007–2009
and the austerity policies that swiftly followed in its wake. Jamie Peck and
Nik Theodore (2019) suggest the necessity of “confront[ing] neoliberal-
ism as an emergent mode of regulation, one that has become cumulatively
embedded across multiple sites and spaces such that it increasingly defines
the rules of the game and the terrain of struggle, even if never acting alone
or monopolizing that terrain.” (Peck and Theodore 2019, 246). The pur-
pose of this book is to contribute to a growing body of Irish cultural stud-
ies scholarship that seeks to interrogate the role of popular culture in
installing neoliberal values as common sense (see, for instance, Kiersey
2014; Brick and Davidson 2017; Free and Scully 2018; Negra and
McIntyre 2020; McIntyre 2021).
For scholars such as Peck and Theodore, neoliberalism is never a mono-
lithic construct, but one that is variegated. This plasticity, in their account,
should act as “an invitation to conjunctural analysis, sensitive to variable
(local) projects, formations, struggles, and contestations, and at the same
time recognizing the openness of emergent pathways and future hori-
zons” (246). This approach aligns with scholarship on Irish manifestations
of this economic model. Geographers Rob Kitchin et al. (2012) in an
influential article tracing the economic and spatial impacts of neoliberal-
ism suggest that Ireland differed from the UK and the US, where neolib-
eralism was “an ideologically informed project” instigated under the
premierships of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. For Kitchin et al.,
“Irish neoliberalism was produced through a set of short-term (intermit-
tently reformed) deals brokered by the state with various companies, indi-
viduals, and representative bodies, which cumulatively restructured Ireland
in unsustainable and geographically ‘uneven’ ways” (1306). Nevertheless,
while neoliberalism may not have been imposed upon the Irish in the top-
down manner of the US and the UK, the role of media figures and the
culture industries more broadly was also crucial to the shifting ideological
consensus that helped broker neoliberalism’s acceptance in a newly secula-
rised Ireland and a post-conflict Northern Ireland.
Irish studies scholar Joe Cleary (2018) suggests Ireland’s reputation for
“creativity”—a notable neoliberal buzzword, and one which, as I detail in
Chap. 5 has been seized upon with gusto by the Irish state—combined
with several other factors (a mobile, educated workforce; lack of
1 INTRODUCTION—“FRACTURED MOVEMENT”: TRANSNATIONALISM… 7
in cultural studies, media studies and Irish studies. The conjunctures that
this book intersects with, and which are associated in some ways with the
populist currents that Volcic and Andrejevic (2016) contend are precipi-
tated by globalist and neoliberal tendencies are Trumpism in the US,
Brexit in the UK, (both of which I consider in the remainder of this sec-
tion) and a post-Celtic Tiger Ireland characterised for many years by aus-
terity and economic migration. The global COVID-19 pandemic that
swept the world in 2020 is dwelt upon in the coda of this book.
The Brexit referendum of 2016 and Britain’s subsequent departure
from the European Union demonstrates the complex interplay between
nation states. The sundering of the UK from the EU has reignited ten-
sions in Northern Ireland given the Irish border’s sudden reconfiguration
as a boundary not only between Britain and Ireland, but between Britain
and the EU. This momentous political recalibration has undermined the
1998 Good Friday Agreement that marked the putative end of The
Troubles in Northern Ireland and the beginning of a power-sharing sys-
tem underwritten by British and Irish state support. The fact that the UK
has historically been the destination to which a majority of Irish emigrants
depart contributes also to the fraught relations between the two nations.
Certain figures and texts analysed herein (footballer McClean, Derry Girls
[2018–]; Mrs Brown’s Boys [2011–] in Chap. 6; sitcoms focusing on the
Irish in Britain such as Catastrophe [2015–2019] and This Way Up [2019]
in Chap. 5) all register in complex ways the seismic shifts under way in the
second decade of the 2000s.
In particular, my examination of McClean’s refusal to wear the Earl
Haig poppy year on year, while playing in the English football leagues
demonstrates how a personal protest informed by the player’s experience
of British militarism on the streets of Derry became a cultural lightning
rod. In many ways McClean’s protest (begun in 2012) prefigured the rise
of a virulent nationalism in the UK that was tied in complex ways to
notions of remembrance and the valorisation of sacrifices made in conflict,
in particular the First World War, and which manifested in its most potent
expression in the Brexit vote to take the UK out of the European Union.
The vote has compounded uncertainties in terms of national belonging
that have emerged for Irish and other national subjects in these years,
uncertainties often rooted in shared and troubled histories of colonialism
and migration.
It is important to clarify at this point that the transnational shifts I track
in this book are for the most part related to anglophone countries, and
1 INTRODUCTION—“FRACTURED MOVEMENT”: TRANSNATIONALISM… 11
primarily the interplay between Ireland, the US and the UK. In many ways
this is due to the triangulation of diasporic movement between these
nations, as well as the dominance of both the UK and the US in terms of
cultural production pertaining to Ireland. Sociologist Mary J. Hickman
(2002) emphasizes this connection in her consideration of the definition
and impact of the Irish diaspora, characterising it as:
trans denotes both moving across space or across lines, as well as changing
the nature of something. Besides suggesting new relations between nation
states and capital, transnationality also alludes to the transversal, the transac-
tional, the translational, and the transgressive aspects of contemporary
behaviour and imagination that are incited, enabled, and regulated by the
changing logics of states and capitalism. (4)
1 INTRODUCTION—“FRACTURED MOVEMENT”: TRANSNATIONALISM… 13
culture” that I deploy in the title to this book is also not without its diffi-
culties, as Stuart Hall (1981) cautions. For my purposes, I take the term
to designate the realm of cultural activity that while reaching a broad audi-
ence, still tends to be conceptualised as “low culture,” far from the rarefied
realm of Art, Literature or even cinematic auteurism. While the discipline
of Irish studies has begun, in fits and starts, to see such texts as advertising,
sitcoms, non-traditional sports broadcasts, reality television, celebrity cul-
ture and memes as within its purview, the present study contends such an
approach is essential to any account of contemporary Irishness and the
shifts it has undergone in the twenty-first century.
While the archive I assemble is somewhat variegated, certain genres or
modes find greater representation. Comedy, whether in television sitcom
form or associated hybrid genres of comedy-drama or dramedy, is a key
feature of this book. This, in part, is related to comedy’s capacity, similar
indeed to that of sports, to generate feelings of togetherness. As Alenka
Zupančič (2020) has suggested, “Laughter is not only or simply an expres-
sion of individual relief and pleasure, it is decidedly a collective-forming
affect, more so perhaps than any other” (2020, 281). Similarly, for Andy
Medhurst (2007), “Above all else, comedy is an invitation to belong”
(2007, 19). That comedy can foster a sense of collectivity and belonging,
also registers in an opposing formation. As some feel included or part of a
collective, others will also feel excluded. Mrs Brown’s Boys, a sitcom exam-
ined in Chap. 6, is perhaps particularly exemplary of this facet of comedy,
given the strong polarisation the sitcom provokes, which skews along gen-
erational and regional lines.
My focus on the popular aligns with the multiple scalar levels with
which this study is concerned. As geographer Jason Dittmer (2005) argues
“Popular culture is one of the ways in which people come to understand
their position both within a larger collective identity, and within an even
larger geopolitical narrative, or script” (626). This aspect of popular cul-
ture is essential for this book’s purposes, given its concern with Irishness
on a regional, national, and transnational level. Part of my argument in
this book centres on the expanded reach of contemporary communica-
tions channels. So, for instance, the sitcom Derry Girls, originally broad-
cast on Channel 4 in the UK, which I examine in Chap. 3 has an expanded
reach since it has been made available internationally on streaming video
on demand (SVOD) provider Netflix. This implications of this are that the
vernacular language and specific accents that index the sitcom’s regionality
are foregrounded, a feature of the sitcom that can both elicit positive and
1 INTRODUCTION—“FRACTURED MOVEMENT”: TRANSNATIONALISM… 19
Bibliography
Allen, Nicholas. 2021. Ireland, Literature, and the Coast: Seatangled. Oxford:
Oxford UP.
Baker, Stephen, and Greg McLaughlin. 2015. “From Belfast to Bamako: Cinema
in the Era of Capitalist Realism.” In Ireland and Cinema: Culture and Contexts,
ed. Barry Monaghan, 107–116. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barton, Ruth. 2019. Irish Cinema in the Twenty-first Century. Manchester:
Manchester UP.
Bielenberg, Andy, ed. 2000. The Irish Diaspora. London: Routledge.
20 A. P. MCINTYRE
Kennedy, Liam. 2015. “Irish Diaspora Is Not Just an Economic Resource.” The
Irish Times. 29 Sept. Web. 16 Sept. www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/
abroad/generation-e migration/irish-d iaspora-i s-n ot-j ust-a n-e conomic-
resource-1.2371326 (accessed 20 May 2021).
Kearney, Michael. 1995. “The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of
Globalization and Transnationalism.” Annual Review of Anthropology
24(1): 547–565.
King-O’Riain, Rebecca Chiyoko. 2021. “How the Irish Became More than White:
Mixed-race Irishness in Historical and Contemporary Contexts.” Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(4): 821–837.
Kitchin, Rob, Cian O’Callaghan, Mark Boyle, Justin Gleeson, and Karen Keaveney.
2012. “Placing Neoliberalism: The Rise and Fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger.”
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44(6): 1302–1326.
McElroy, Ruth, and Caitriona Noonan. 2019. Producing British Television Drama:
Local Production in a Global Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McKee, Lyra. 2017. “The Suicide of The Ceasefire Babies.” OpenLearn, The
Open University, 25 Aug. www.open.edu/openlearn/health-sports-
psychology/mental-health/the-suicide-the-ceasefire-babies (accessed 12
June 2020).
McIntyre, Anthony P. 2021. “Home Truths: Property TV, Financialization, and
the Housing Crisis in Contemporary Ireland.” Television & New Media
22(1): 65–82.
Medhurst, Andy. 2007. A National Joke: Popular Comedy and English Cultural
Identities. London: Routledge.
Morley, David. 2010. “Domesticating Dislocation in a World of ‘New’
Technology.” In Electronic Elsewheres: Media, Technology, and the Experience of
Social Space, eds., Chris Berry, Soyoung Kim and Lynn Spigel, 3–15.
Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Moynihan, Sinéad. 2013. “Other People’s Diasporas”: Negotiating Race in
Contemporary Irish and Irish American Culture. Syracuse: Syracuse UP.
Moynihan, Sinéad. 2019. Ireland, Migration and Return Migration: The Returned
Yank in the Cultural Imagination, 1952 to the Present. Liverpool: Liverpool UP.
Negra, Diane, and Anthony P. McIntyre. 2020. “Ireland Inc.: The Corporatization
of Affective Life in Post-Celtic Tiger Ireland.” European Journal of Cultural
Studies 23 (1): 60–80.
Negra, Diane, ed. 2006. The Irish in Us: Irishness, Performativity and Popular
Culture. Durham: Duke UP.
O’Leary, Eleanor, and Diane Negra. 2016. “Emigration, return migration and
surprise homecomings in post-Celtic Tiger Ireland.” Irish Studies Review
24(2): 127–141.
Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality.
Durham: Duke UP.
22 A. P. MCINTYRE
Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore. 2019. “Still Neoliberalism?” South Atlantic
Quarterly 118(2): 245–65.
Russell, Helen, Bertrand Maître, Dorothy Watson, and Éamonn Fahey. 2018. Job
Stress and Working Conditions: Ireland in Comparative Perspective — an
Analysis of the European Working Conditions Survey. Dublin: The Economic
and Social Research Institute.
Szeman, Imre. 2015. “Entrepreneurship as the New Common Sense.” South
Atlantic Quarterly 114(3): 471–490.
Toner, John. 2021. “Now We’re Sucking Diesel: Horror Legend Stephen King
Loves Line of Duty.” Independent.ie. 10 July, https://www.independent.ie/
entertainment/television/tv-news/now-were-sucking-diesel-horror-legend-
stephen-king-loves-line-of-duty-40637405.html (accessed 29 Sept. 2021)
Volcic, Zala, and Mark Andrejevic. 2016. “Introduction.” In Commercial
Nationalism: Selling the Nation and Nationalizing the Sell, eds., Zala Volcic
and Mark Andrejevic, 1–13. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, Julie A. 2018. Neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.
Zupančič, Alenka. 2020. “Preston Sturges and The End of Laughter.” Crisis and
Critique 7(2): 273–289.
CHAPTER 2
This chapter, and several of the others to follow, suggests that an analysis
of contemporary iterations of stardom and celebrity provides a useful
prism through which to view shifts in wider Irish society in the post-Celtic
Tiger era. The heightened individualism of stardom/celebrity allows for
an analysis that can span multiple textual formations, from journalistic
portrayals of the individual in question and social media postings on the
part of the celebrity, to media content (films and television programmes,
for instance) featuring the figure, and the critical and popular reception of
these. This form of cultural studies approach, when used in tandem with
interdisciplinary scholarship drawn from academic fields including
Sociology, History and Politics enables the generation of insights derived
from multiple axes of analysis. To that end, the present chapter considers
the career of Irish actor Chris O’Dowd as a site of embodied social knowl-
edge regarding Ireland and its diasporic populations in the twenty-first
century.
O’Dowd—born in Sligo, raised in neighbouring Roscommon and now
living in Los Angeles, having worked in London for a substantial portion
of his professional career—is an example of the diasporic and transnational
tendencies that are often central to a successful career in the performing
arts. Although Ireland in many ways has an arts scene that belies the coun-
try’s comparatively small size, cosmopolitan centres of cultural production
such as London and Los Angeles have long exerted a powerful draw upon
those trying to make their way in the creative industries (Barton and
Murphy 2020). The flow of aspirants seeking a place in these industries
mirrors a wider transnational movement among the Irish population with
well-established roots. It has been argued that a recourse to emigration is
almost instinctive in the Irish, especially in times of economic duress, with
the exodus of prior generations having established a symbolic and material
infrastructure for Irish people to leave their homeland for professional,
economic, or other reasons (O’Toole 2016). The present chapter, through
an examination of O’Dowd’s professional career limns some of the con-
tours of contemporary Irish diasporic life patterns and the ideological
shaping of this constitutive element of Irishness, particularly as they mani-
fest in popular culture.
An established body of scholarship contends that the mediated con-
struction of stars and celebrities, figures who hold a prominent position
within an ever-expanding mediascape, undergird notions of selfhood and
subjectivity. The significant decline in the influence of traditional reli-
gion—Catholicism predominantly in the case of the Republic of Ireland—
has seen stardom and celebrity partially fill the void left through the
provision of models of behaviour, however problematic in their own ways
these new social configurations may be. For sociologist Chris Rojek
(2001), in this context, celebrity functions as one of several “replacement
strategies that produce new orders of meaning and solidarity,” with celeb-
rity culture, in the main, constituting “a significant institution in the nor-
mative achievement of social integration” (99). In a similar vein, P. David
Marshall (1997) claims that “celebrities represent subject positions that
audiences can adopt or adapt in their formation of social identities” (65),
a process he sees as providing “an embodiment of collective configurations
within individual representations” (51). Taking the nation as such a col-
lective configuration, we can conceive that in a country such as Ireland,
with its long histories of migration and substantial diasporic communities,
the embodiment of a transnational identity that unites a sense of belong-
ing within the home nation with the possibilities afforded by relocation is
one of the key functions of contemporary Irish celebrity.1
As outlined in the introductory chapter, Ireland has for some time pur-
sued economic policies predicated on securing outside investment and
developing an open economy that positions the nation as the gateway to
Europe for US corporations. This, and the dispersal of a populace that is
also shaped by such economic strategies—predicated as they are on the
transnational flow of people, material goods and capital—is reflected in
2 STAR LEVERAGE, LOCAL MATTERS, AND TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA: CHRIS… 25
Film scholar Ruth Barton (2006) has noted the centrality of male star
discourse to contemporary notions of Irishness. While one might assume
the emergence of Oscar-nominated stars such as Saoirse Ronan and Ruth
Negga suggests a redress of the gender balance in terms of international
stardom is currently under way (see Barrett 2015), male stars still outnum-
ber their female compatriots by a considerable measure. O’Dowd is, along
with Domhnall Gleeson, Andrew Scott, and Jamie Dornan, part of a gen-
erational cohort of prominent male Irish stars born in the late seventies
and early eighties who move fluidly between television and cinema in the
twenty-first century. O’Dowd has not achieved the consistent headline
billing attained by more high-profile stars like Michael Fassbender and
Colin Farrell, yet arguably this distance from the apex of the star system
renders him a more approachable and demotic form of star, in sync with
an era in which the longstanding hierarchies that obtain within the film
industry are under increasing duress.
After working as a jobbing actor in the UK for several years, O’Dowd
first came to prominence, in the UK and Ireland, playing the hapless soft-
ware support worker Roy in fellow Irishman Graham Linehan’s sitcom
The IT Crowd (2006–2013). The role would prove pivotal in the actor’s
career not only for giving him his first critical success, but also for facilitat-
ing his big break in the US. Bridesmaids’ director Paul Feig was an IT
Crowd fan and asked O’Dowd to try the audition for the film in his own
accent after an initial try in an American one failed to impress (Solomons
2011). The incident demonstrates the growing importance of transna-
tional creative networks predicated on specific genre knowledge and
appreciation—a phenomenon I deal with in more detail in considering the
2 STAR LEVERAGE, LOCAL MATTERS, AND TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA: CHRIS… 27
from elitist notions of stardom and Hollywood glamour, which are increas-
ingly associated with punishing regimes of bodily regulation.
This aspect of the O’Dowd’s appeal is often foregrounded in media
profiles of the actor. An April 2014 issue of GQ magazine, for instance,
features O’Dowd on the cover alongside a beautiful glamour model with
the tagline “Frankly, we can’t believe Chris O’Dowd’s luck either!”
(Fig. 2.1) The cover, and tagline, suggests that part of the star’s appeal is
his evocation of an ordinariness that secures empathy with audiences, with
the “we” of the headline interpellating an audience who might, by similar
quirk of fate, end up in O’Dowd’s “lucky” position. This narrative of an
everyman finding himself incongruously situated among the elite of the
entertainment industry is further emphasized through the self-deprecating
humour O’Dowd employs in media interviews.
Such self-deprecation is evident in a 2012 interview with Conan
O’Brien on his TBS talk show Conan (2010–2021), in which the actor is
promoting the comedy This is 40. O’Dowd discusses at length his tall phy-
sique and how unusual his body looks naked, joking that it has led to vari-
ous nude scenes being omitted from films he has acted in, and drawing a
contrast between his own physique and the petite frame of Megan Fox,
the glamorous co-star with whom he shared a poolside scene in the movie.
The interview also aligns O’Dowd with the similarly built physique of the
host, and O’Brien’s own rhetorical mainstay of an ethnicized bodily self-
deprecation (usually regarding his red hair or fair skin). A later interview
on the same show in May 2020 has O’Brien clearly savouring and imitat-
ing O’Dowd’s pronunciation of his dog Potato’s name. Both the ethni-
cally inflected corporeal comparisons and accent appreciation and mimicry
on display in these interviews foreground the connections between Irish
and Irish-American performative modes and serve as a public attestation
of good will between Irish diasporic subjects of different generational
removes from the home nation.2
O’Dowd’s demotic positioning undergirds his emergence as a post-
Celtic Tiger figure, distanced from the perceived hedonistic excesses of
Irish actors such as Colin Farrell and Jonathan Rhys Meyers, physically
attractive performers who were among the most prominent exemplars of
Irish male masculinity on screen at the outset of the twenty-first century.
The well-documented issues with alcohol and drug misuse that have
tainted the careers of Farrell and Rhys Meyers, leading to public disavow-
als of past behaviours and habits on the part of both actors, are not a fea-
ture of O’Dowd’s star discourse. In part this is due to a multi-mediated
30 A. P. MCINTYRE
and coherent screen presence on the part of O’Dowd. While O’Dowd has
had some prominent examples of public drunkenness, particularly on an
episode of British chat show The Last Leg (2012–) in October 2018,
2 STAR LEVERAGE, LOCAL MATTERS, AND TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA: CHRIS… 31
public opinion about the appearance was generally favourable. The actor
had been noticeably inebriated, but in a very good-humoured manner,
telling a rambling joke to the evident amusement of the hosts and fellow
guests on the show. O’Dowd in this role personifies Irish conviviality and
humour and the darker associations between alcohol and Irishness are
attenuated. The seeming shift in popularity from stars imbued with a
hedonistic quality to O’Dowd’s more everyman characteristics suggest the
complex ways in which stardom works as a barometer of social processes.
It also attests to the labile quality of Irish performativity, a somewhat capa-
cious mode of expression that nevertheless tends to operate within a fixed
set of coordinates. The shift from hedonism to the demotic qualities with
which O’Dowd is associated roughly aligns with a post-Celtic Tiger
national sense conveyed in national discourse, evident across a range of
media, that the Irish had “lost the run of ourselves” in the preceding
boom period (Free and Scully 2018).
The incident on The Last Leg also demonstrates O’Dowd’s facility for
correcting public missteps and the latitude afforded the performer on
account of his gregarious good humour. The actor is a regular user of
social media platform Twitter, and he posted the day after the production
expressing both contrition and bemusement at the incident. Responding
to a Twitter user who, unlike many of the responders to his tweet, criti-
cised the actor’s performance as “embarrassing” and “distasteful,”
O’Dowd posted, “I am a little embarrassed to be honest. But to keep
things in perspective, it’s a tipsy comedian on a late-night chat show on
Channel 4. I wasn’t doing meth on bbc breakfast. But thanks for your
concern, genuinely” (Starkey 2018). Similarly, O’Dowd used humour
during a podcast interview with broadcaster Louis Theroux to walk back
his role in the recording of John Lennon’s “Imagine” organized by Israeli
actress Gal Gadot when many parts of the world went into lockdown due
to the COVID-19 pandemic. The viral video, featuring a number of celeb-
rities singing along to the classic song, was publicly reviled as “tone deaf”
in conception, given its seeming equation between the lives of Hollywood
stars holed up in their mansions with the plight of others in more strait-
ened circumstances. After laughing through the host’s straight-faced
description of the song as “proving divisive on the internet,” and his sub-
sequent jibes, O’Dowd characterises the video as part of “that first wave of
creative diarrhoea that seemed to encase the world [at an early point in the
pandemic],” and further concedes that “any backlash was fairly justified”
(“Grounded with Louis Theroux 10. Chris O’Dowd” 2020). This mixture
32 A. P. MCINTYRE
we got the script done, then improvised a bit and then went back to the
script and shot that again when we were all kind of loosened up and threw
in bits of improvisation with bits of script. […] We did this improvisation
when we were actually filming. (Hagerty 2011)
By this means, and by breaking open cells already filled with provisions, I got
nearly a hundred weevils, and in spite of what I had a right to [56]expect from
what Léon Dufour has told us of the habits of the Cerceris bupresticida, I could
not repress my astonishment at the sight of the singular collection which I had
made. His Cerceris, though it limits itself to one genus, yet takes any species
within that limit, but the more exclusive C. tuberculata preys exclusively on
Cleonus ophthalmicus. On looking through my booty I met with but one single
exception, and that belonged to a closely allied species, C. alternans—one
which I never met with again in my frequent visits to the Cerceris. Later
researches furnished me with a second exception, Bothynoderes albidus, and
these are all. Can a specially succulent and savoury prey explain this
predilection for a single species? Do the larvæ find in this unvaried diet juices
which suit them peculiarly, and which they would not find elsewhere? I do not
think so, and if Léon Dufour’s Cerceris hunted all the kinds of Buprestids, no
doubt it was because they all have the same nutritive properties. But this must
generally be the case with all the Curculionidæ; their alimentary properties must
be identical, and in that case this amazing choice can only be one of size, and
therefore of economy of labour and time. Our Cerceris, the giant of its race,
chooses C. ophthalmicus as the largest in our district, and perhaps the
commonest. But if this favourite prey fail, it must fall back upon other species,
even if smaller, as is proved by the two exceptions above mentioned.
We see that out of eight species of Cerceris [58]which lay up Coleoptera as food,
seven hunt weevils and one Buprestids. What singular reason confines the
chase of these Hymenoptera within such narrow limits? What are the motives of
such an exclusive selection? What internal likeness is there between the
Buprestids and the weevils, outwardly quite dissimilar, that both should become
food for carnivorous and nearly related larvæ? No doubt between such and such
a victim there are differences as to taste and nutritive qualities which the larvæ
thoroughly appreciate, but there must be a far graver reason than these
gastronomic considerations to explain these strange predilections.
[To face p. 58.
CERCERIS FERRERI AND ITS PREY, THE WEEVIL;
The functions of this vegetative life are slackened and troubled no doubt, but still
they are feebly exercised. I have the proof of this in that action of the viscera
which takes place normally and at intervals in the weevils during the first week of
that deep slumber, which will never be broken, and yet which is not death. It only
ceases when the intestine is empty, as is shown by autopsy. But the faint rays of
life which the creature manifests do not stop there; and though sensation
appears annihilated for ever, I have succeeded in reawakening some vestige of
them. Having placed weevils, recently exhumed and absolutely motionless, in a
bottle with sawdust moistened with benzine, I was not a little surprised to see a
quarter of an hour later moving antennæ and feet. For a moment I thought I
could recall them to life. Vain hope! these movements, last trace of a
sensitiveness about to cease, soon stopped, and could not be excited a second
time. I have repeated this experiment from [60]some hours to several days after
the murder, and always with the same success; only movement is tardy in
appearing in proportion as the date of the victim’s death is distant. The
movements are always from the forepart backward. First, the antennæ move,
then the front tarsi tremble and share in the oscillations; next, the second pair do
the same; and finally, the third. Once movement is excited, all these members
oscillate without any order until all become again motionless, as they do sooner
or later. Unless death has been quite recent, movement does not go beyond the
tarsi, and the legs remain motionless.
Ten days after the murder I could not obtain the least sign of irritability by the
proceeding described, and I had recourse to the Voltaic battery. This is more
effective, and provokes muscular contractions where the vapour of benzine fails.
One or two elements of Bunsen suffice, which are armed with the rheophores of
slender needles. Plunging the point of the one under the furthest ring of the
abdomen, and the point of the other under the neck, you obtain each time that
the current is established, not only the quivering of the tarsi, but a strong flexion
of the feet, which fold themselves under the body, and relax when the current is
interrupted. These movements, very energetic during the first days, gradually
lose intensity, and after a certain time appear no more. On the tenth day I have
still been able to obtain visible motions, but on the fifteenth the pile was unable
to provoke them, notwithstanding the suppleness of the limbs and freshness of
the viscera. I have submitted also [61]to the action of the pile Coleoptera really
dead, Blaps, Saperda, Lamia, asphyxiated by benzine or sulphureous gas, and
two hours later it was impossible to provoke the movements obtained so easily
from weevils lying already for several days in the singular state, intermediate
between life and death, into which their redoubtable enemy plunges them.
All these facts contradict the supposition of an animal completely dead, and the
hypothesis of a real corpse rendered incorruptible by some antiseptic liquid. One
can only explain them by admitting that the animal is struck in the principle of its
movements, and that sensitiveness, suddenly benumbed, dies slowly out, while
the more tenacious, vegetative functions die yet more slowly and preserve the
intestines during the time necessary for the larva.
The most important detail to show was how the murder is committed. Evidently,
the chief part must be played by the poisoned dart of the Cerceris. But where
and how does it penetrate the body of the weevil, covered with a hard cuirass,
with pieces so closely joined? Even under the magnifying glass nothing told
where the sting entered. Direct examination, therefore, was required to discover
the murderous ways of the Cerceris—a problem before whose difficulties Léon
Dufour had already recoiled, and the solution of which seemed to me for a time
impossible. I tried, however, and had the satisfaction of succeeding, though not
without some groping about.
When they fly from their holes to the chase, the Cerceris go here and there,
sometimes on one [62]side, sometimes on the other, and return from all
directions, loaded with prey, so that they must seek it on all sides; but as they
barely take ten minutes between going and returning, the space worked over
could not be very great, especially considering the time necessary to discover
the prey, to attack and render it an inert mass. I, therefore, set myself to examine
all the adjacent ground with close attention, hoping to discover some Cerceris
on the hunt. One afternoon devoted to this weary work convinced me of the
uselessness of my researches, and of the little chance I had of surprising any of
the few Cerceris, scattered here and there, and soon lost to view by their rapid
flight; above all, in difficult ground, planted with olives, I gave up the attempt. But
by carrying live weevils to the neighbourhood of the nests might I not tempt the
Cerceris by a prey found without trouble, and so observe the drama? The notion
seemed good, and the very next day I set out to find live Cleonus ophthalmicus.
Vineyards, wheat-fields, and crops of lucerne, and heaps of stones did I visit and
examine one and all, and after two days of close search I possessed—dare I
own it?—three weevils! bare, dusty, maimed of antennæ or tarsi, shabby old
creatures which, perhaps, the Cerceris would not touch! Since the day of that
fevered search, when, for a weevil’s sake, I bathed myself in perspiration during
my wild expedition, many a year has passed, and yet, in spite of almost daily
entomological researches, I am still ignorant of the life and habits of this
Cleonus, which I met here and there, straying on the edge of paths. Wonderful
powers of instinct! [63]in the same spots, and in a fraction of time, one
Hymenopteron would have found hundreds of these insects which man cannot
find, and found them fresh and shining, no doubt just emerged from the cocoon!
No matter; let us experiment with my wretched victim. A Cerceris has just gone
into her gallery with her prey; before she comes out for a new expedition I place
a weevil a few inches from her hole. The weevil moves about; when it strays too
far I bring it back to its place. At last the Cerceris shows her wide face at the
mouth of her hole; my heart beats fast. She walks for a few minutes near her
dwelling, sees the weevil, brushes against it, turns, passes several times over its
back, and flies off without even honouring my captive with a bite—my captive
which cost me so much labour! I was confounded—knocked over. New attempts
at other holes, new disappointments. Decidedly these dainty hunters will have
none of the game which I offer them. Perhaps they find it too old, too tasteless;
perhaps, in handling it, I communicated some smell to it which displeases them.
Foreign contact disgusts these connoisseurs.
A luminous idea flashed upon me, bringing hope, so naturally did it touch the
very heart of the question. Of course, it was the right thing and must succeed.
My disdained game must be offered to the Cerceris in the heat of the chase—
then, absorbed and preoccupied, she will not discover its imperfections. I have
already said that on returning from the chase the Cerceris alights at the foot of
the incline at some distance from the hole, whither she laboriously drags the
prey. What I then had to do was to deprive her of her victim, drawing it away by
one foot with pincers, and instantly throwing her the living weevil in exchange.
This manœuvre succeeded perfectly. As soon as the Cerceris felt the prey slip
under her body and escape her, she stamped with impatience, turned round,
and perceiving the weevil which had replaced hers, flung herself upon it and
clasped it in order to carry it away. But she promptly perceived that this prey was
alive, and then the drama began and ended with inconceivable rapidity. The
Cerceris faced her victim, seized its proboscis with her powerful jaws and
grasped it vigorously, and while the weevil reared itself up, pressed her forefeet
hard on its back as if to force open some ventral articulation. Then the tail of the
murderess slid under the Cleonus, curved and darted its poisoned lancet swiftly
two or three times at the joining of the prothorax, between the first and second
pair of feet. In a twinkling all was over. Without [65]one convulsive movement,
with no motion of the limbs such as accompany the death of an animal, the
victim fell motionless for ever, as if annihilated. It was at once wonderful and
terrible in its rapidity. Then the assassin turned the Weevil on its back, placing
herself body to body with it, her legs on either side of it, and flew off. Three times
I renewed the experiment with my three Weevils, and the same scene was
always enacted.
Of course, each time I gave the Cerceris back her first prey and withdrew my
Cleonus to examine it at greater leisure. This examination only confirmed my
opinion of the terrible skill of the assassin. It is impossible to find the slightest
trace of a wound, or the smallest flow of vital liquids from the point which was
struck. But the most striking thing is the rapid, complete annihilation of all
movement. Vainly did I seek even immediately after the murder for any trace of
sensibility in the three Weevils done to death under my eyes—neither pinching
nor pricking provoked it; to do so required the artificial means already
mentioned. Thus these robust Cleonus, which, pierced alive with a pin and fixed
by a collector on his fatal sheet of cork, would have struggled for days, weeks,
nay, whole months, instantly lose all power of motion from the effect of a little
prick which inoculates them with a minute drop of poison. Chemistry knows none
so active in so small a dose; scarcely could prussic acid produce such an effect,
if, indeed, it could do so at all. It is not then to toxology, but to physiology and
anatomy that we must turn to find the cause of such instantaneous catalepsy; it
is not so much [66]the great virulence of the poison injected, as the importance of
the organ injured by it which we must consider in order to explain these marvels.
What, then, is found at the point where the sting penetrates? [67]
[Contents]
V
ONE SKILFUL TO SLAY
At first sight this storing of food appears simple enough, but reflexion
soon discovers graver difficulties. Our own game is brought down by
a shot and killed with horrible wounds. The Hymenopteron has
refinements unknown to us; she chooses to have her prey intact,
with all its elegance of form and colour. No broken limbs, no gaping
wounds, no hideous disembowelment. Her prey has all the freshness
of the living insect; she does not destroy an atom of the fine-coloured
powder which the mere contact of our fingers deflowers. If the insect
were really dead, really a corpse, how difficult it would be for us to
obtain such a result! Any one can slay [68]an insect by stamping
brutally on it, but to kill it neatly leaving no sign is no easy operation,
within every one’s power. How many of us would be at our wits’ end
if we had to kill on the spot, without crushing it, a little creature so
tenacious of life that even beheaded it still goes on struggling! One
must have been a practical entomologist before thinking of
asphyxiation, and here, again, success would be doubtful with the
primitive methods of vapour of benzine or burnt sulphur. In this
deleterious atmosphere the insect struggles too long, and tarnishes
its brightness. One must have recourse to more heroic methods—for
instance, to the terrible exhalations of prussic acid slowly
disengaging themselves from strips of paper impregnated with
cyanide of potassium, or better still, as being without danger to the
collector, to the thunderbolt of vapour of bisulphide of carbon. It
requires a real art, an art calling to its aid the redoubtable arsenal of
chemistry, to kill an insect neatly; to do that is what the elegant
method of the Cerceris brings about so quickly, if we admit the stupid
supposition that her prey really becomes a dead body.
A dead body! But that is by no means the diet of the larvæ, little
ogres greedy for fresh meat, to whom game ever so slightly tainted
would inspire insurmountable disgust. They must have fresh meat
with no high taste—that first sign of decay. Yet the prey cannot be
laid up alive in the cell like animals destined to furnish fresh meat to
the crew and passengers of a vessel. What would become of a
delicate egg laid among living food? What would become of the
feeble larva, a worm bruised by the slightest [69]thing among
vigorous Coleoptera moving their long spurred legs for whole
weeks? It is absolutely necessary—and here we seem caught in a
blind alley—to obtain deathly immobility with the freshness of life for
the interior organs. Before such an alimentary problem the best
instructed man of the world would stand helpless—even the
practised entomologist would own himself at a loss. The larder of the
Cerceris would defy their reasoning powers.
Should one insist and explain that the larvæ require not preserved
food which could never have the properties of flesh still palpitating,
but prey yet alive, so to say, in spite of complete absence of motion,
the learned Congress, after ripe consideration, will fall back upon
paralysis: “Yes, of course; the creature has to be paralysed without
being killed.” There is but one means of arriving at this [70]result,
namely, to injure, cut, and destroy the nervous system of the insect
in one or more skilfully chosen points.
This difficulty removed, a far graver one presents itself. Armed with
his scalpel, the anatomist can direct its point where he will in spite of
obstacles which he may have to set aside. The Hymenopteron has
no choice. Its victim is a solidly cuirassed beetle, its lancet a dart,
extremely delicate, which the horny mail would certainly turn aside.
Only certain points are vulnerable to the frail tool, namely, the joints,
protected simply by a membrane with no power of resistance. But
the joints of the limbs, although vulnerable, do not in the least fulfil
the necessary conditions, for through these the utmost that could be
obtained is local paralysis, not one affecting the whole organism of
motion. Without any prolonged struggle, without repeated
operations, which, if too numerous, might endanger the victim’s life,
the Hymenopteron has, if possible, to abolish all [71]motive power at
one blow. Therefore she must direct her dart at the nervous centres,
the source of the power of motion whence radiate the nerves running
up to the various organs of movement. Now these sources of
locomotion, these nervous centres, consist of a certain number of
ganglia, more numerous in the larva, less so in the perfect insect,
and arranged on the median line of the under surface in a string of
beads more or less distant and connected by a double ribbon of
nervous tissue. In all insects which have reached the perfect state
the ganglia called thoracic, i.e. those furnishing nerves to wings and
feet and governing their movements, are three in number. Here are
the points to be struck: if their action can be in any way destroyed,
the possibility of movement is destroyed also.
To choose as the spot in which to plant her sting the one vulnerable
point, the point which only a [72]physiologist versed in the anatomy of
insects could determine beforehand is by no means enough; the
Hymenopteron has a far greater difficulty to overcome, and she
overcomes it with a mastery which fills one with amazement. We
said that the nervous centres controlling the organs of motion in an
insect are three. These are more or less distant from each other, but
sometimes, though rarely, near together. They possess a certain
independence of action, so that an injury to one does not cause, at
all events immediately, more than paralysis of members connected
with it, while the other ganglia and their corresponding members are
not affected by it. To reach these three sources of motion one after
the other, the second farther off than the first, and the last farther
still, and by a single way, between the first and second pairs of feet,
seems impossible for the sting, which is too short, and besides, so
difficult to aim well in such conditions. True, certain Coleoptera have
the three ganglia of the thorax almost touching, and others have the
two last completely united, soldered, smelted together. It is also
recognised that in proportion as the different nervous centres
combine and centralise, the characteristic functions of animality
become more perfect, and also, alas, more vulnerable. Those
Coleoptera with centres of motion so near that they touch or even
gather into one mass, and so are made part of each other, would be
instantly paralysed by one sting; or if several were needed, at all
events the ganglia to be paralysed are all collected under the point of
the dart.
Now which are the Coleoptera so specially easy [73]to paralyse? That
is the question. The lofty science of a Claude Bernard, floating in the
fundamental generalities of organisation and life, is no longer
enough for us; it is unable to inform and guide us in this
entomological selection. I appeal to every physiologist under whose
eye these lines may fall. Without having recourse to his book-
shelves, could he name the Coleoptera where such a nervous
centralisation is found, and even with the help of his library, could he
instantly lay his hand on the information wanted? The truth is, we are
entering on the minute details of the specialist; the highway is quitted
for a path known to few.
The Melasomes and the Longicorns are more sensitive to the action
of ammonia. The injection of a small corrosive drop quickly renders
them motionless, and after some twitching they seem dead. But the
paralysis which would have persisted in Weevils, Scarabids, and
Buprestids is but momentary. Before long motion reappears as
energetic as before. It is only when the dose of ammonia is of a
certain strength that movement does not reappear. But then the
creature is really dead, and putrefaction rapidly comes on. It is then
impossible to cause complete and persistent paralysis in Coleoptera
with ganglia far apart by the means so efficacious in those with
ganglia near together. At the utmost one can only obtain momentary
paralysis, which passes quickly away. The demonstration is decisive.
Cerceris which prey on Coleoptera conform in their [79]choice to what
the most learned physiology and finest anatomy alone can teach. It
would be vain to endeavour to see nothing here but chance
agreement; it is not chance which explains such harmony. [80]