Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Essentials of Nursing Informatics 7Th Edition Virginia Saba Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Essentials of Nursing Informatics 7Th Edition Virginia Saba Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-nursing-informatics-
study-guide-brixey/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-nursing-leadership-
management-7th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-nursing-leadership-
management-7th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-clinical-informatics-
mark-e-frisse/
Informatics and Nursing 6th Edition, (Ebook PDF)
https://ebookmass.com/product/informatics-and-nursing-6th-
edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/nursing-informatics-and-the-
foundation-of-knowledge-4th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-correctional-
nursing-1st-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/wongs-essentials-of-pediatric-
nursing-10th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/essentials-of-economics-7th-
edition-garratt/
Essentials of
Nursing
Informatics
New York • Chicago • San Francisco • Athens • London • Madrid • Mexico City
Milan • New Delhi • Singapore • Sydney • Toronto
ISBN: 978-1-26-045679-0
MHID: 1-26-045679-X
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-1-26-045678-3,
MHID: 1-26-045678-1.
All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trade-
marked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringe-
ment of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in
corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.
TERMS OF USE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work
is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the
work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit,
distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill Education’s prior consent. You
may use the work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to
use the work may be terminated if you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES
OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED
FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK
VIA HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN-
CLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICU-
LAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work
will meet your requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its
licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any
damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility for the content of any information accessed through
the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special,
punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been
advised of the possibility of such damages. This limitation of liability shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such
claim or cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
CONTENTS
Author deceased
†
Gregory L. Alexander, PhD, RN, FACMI, FAAN Cristina Robles Bahm, PhD, MSIS
Helen Young CUPHSONAA Professor Assistant Professor
Columbia University Program Coordinator
School of Nursing Chair Computer Science
New York, New York La Roche University
Chapter 9: Human–Computer Interaction Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Chapter 6: Data and Data Processing
Patricia E. Allen, EdD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN
Professor Emeritus, Texas Tech University–Health Melissa Barthold,† DNP, MSN, RN-BC, CPHIMSS,
Science Center FHIMSS
School of Nursing Principal
Lubbock, Texas Nursing Informatics Consulting
Chapter 46: Initiation and Management of Cape Coral, Florida
Accessible, Effective Online Learning Chapter 24: Mastering Skills that Support Nursing
Dixie B. Baker, PhD, MS, MS, BS, FHIMSS Amy J. Barton, PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF
Senior Partner, Martin, Blanck and Associates Professor Daniel & Janet Mordecai Rural Health
Alexandria, Virginia Nursing Endowed Chair
Chapter 10: Trustworthy Systems for Safe College of Nursing
and Private Healthcare University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado
Suzanne Bakken, PhD, RN, FACMI, FIAHSI, Chapter 21: Informatics Applications to Support
FAAN Rural and Remote Health
The Alumni Professor of Nursing and Professor
of Biomedical Informatics Margaret S. Beaubien, MS, MSN, RN, CPHIMS
Columbia University Captain, NC, USN (Retired)
New York, New York Napa, California
Chapter 17: Foundations of Nursing Informatics Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector Nursing
Informatics
Khadija Bakrim, EdD
Educational Technologist Carol J. Bickford, PhD, RN-BC, CPHIMS, FAMIA,
Texas Tech University Health Science Center FHIMSS, FAAN
School of Nursing Senior Policy Advisor
Lubbock, Texas American Nurses Association
Chapter 46: Initiation and Management of Accessible, Silver Spring, Maryland
Effective Online Learning Section Editor—Part 1: Nursing Informatics Technologies
Chapter 16: The Practice Specialty of Nursing Informatics
Author deceased
†
ix
Veronica D. Feeg, PhD, RN, FAAN Evelyn J. S. Hovenga, PhD, RN, FACHI, FACS,
Professor, Associate Dean FACN, FIAHSI
Barbara H. Hagan School of Nursing CEO, Professor & Director, eHealth Education PTY Ltd
Molloy College Director, Global eHealth Collaborative (GEHCO)
Rockville Centre, New York East Melbourne, Victoria
Section Editor—Part 9: Research Applications Australia
Chapter 49: Computer Use in Nursing Research Chapter 20: Using Six Sigma and Lean for Measuring
Quality
Rebecca Freeman, PhD, RN, FAAN, FNAP
University of Vermont Susan C. Hull, MSN, RN-BC, NEA, FAMIA
Vice President of Health Informatics Chief Health Information Officer
Burlington, Vermont CareLoop, Inc.
Chapter 18: Establishing Nursing Informatics Boulder, Colorado
in Public Policy Co-chair, Alliance for Nursing Informatics
Chapter 17: Foundations of Nursing Informatics
Nicholas R. Hardiker, PhD, RN, FACMI Chapter 36: New Models of Healthcare Delivery and
Professor of Nursing and Health Informatics and Retailers Producing Big Data
Associate Dean (Research & Enterprise)
School of Human and Health Sciences Elizabeth (Liz) Johnson, MS, FAAN, LCHIME,
University of Huddersfield FCHIME, CHCIO, FHIMSS, RN
Huddersfield, United Kingdom Retired Chief Innovation Officer
Chapter 8: Standardized Nursing Terminologies Tenet Health
Dallas, Texas
Lynda R. Hardy, PhD, RN, FAAN Chapter 22: Communication Skills in Health IT, Building
Director, Data Science & Discovery Strong Teams for Successful Health IT Outcomes
Associate Professor, Clinical
R. Renee Johnson-Smith, RN, MBA
The Ohio State University
Roudebush VA Medical Center
College of Nursing
Risk Manager
Columbus, Ohio
Indianapolis, Indiana
Chapter 26: Improving Healthcare Quality and Patient
Chapter 31: Monitoring Interoperability, Device
Outcomes Through the Integration of Evidence-Based
Interface, and Security
Practice and Informatics
Irene Joos, PhD, RN, MSIS
Lois M. Hazelton, RN, Dip App Sci (Nurs), B App Professor, IST
Sci (Ad Nurs), PhD (Entrepreneurship), FACN Adjunct Professor, Nursing
Independent Consultant and Researcher La Roche University
Nerrina, Victoria Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Australia Chapter 6: Data and Data Processing
Chapter 20: Using Six Sigma and Lean for Measuring
Quality
Mary Ann Lavin, DSc, RN, ANP-BC (Retired), Michael E. Ludwig, MSN, RN-BC, CPHIMS
FNI, FAAN U.S. Army
Multidimensional Search and Design Consultant Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector Nursing
Founder and President, TIIKO, LLC Informatics
Associate Professor Emerita
Saint Louis University E. LaVerne Manos, DNP, RN-BC, FAMIA
Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing Program Director
Saint Louis, Missouri Interprofessional Master of Science in Health
Chapter 28: Structuring Advanced Practice Knowledge: Informatics & Post-Master’s Certificate in Health
Curricular, Practice, and Internet Resource Use Informatics
Director, Informatics
Chanmi Lee, BSN, RN, FNP-C Director, Center for Health Informatics
Family Nurse Practitioner Clinical Associate Professor
Stride Community Health Center Kansas University Center for Health Informatics
Aurora, Colorado Kansas University School of Nursing
Chapter 47: Social Media Tools in the Connected Age Kansas City, Kansas
Chapter 48: A Paradigm Shift in Simulation:
June Levy, MLS Experiential Learning in Virtual Worlds and Future Use
Vice President of Virtual Reality, Robotics, and Drones
CINAHL Information Systems
Glendale, California Karen M. Marhefka, DHA, MHA, RHIA
Chapter 50: Information Literacy and Computerized Principal, Impacts Advisors
Information Resources Naperville, Illinois
Chapter 22: Communication Skills in Health IT,
Yu-Chuan (Jack) Li, MD, PhD, FACMI, FACHI, Building Strong Teams for Successful Health IT Outcomes
FIAHSI
Distinguished Professor and Dean, Graduate Heimar F. Marin, RN, MS, PhD, FACMI
Institute of Biomedical Informatics Alumni Professor, Nursing and Health
College of Medical Science and Technology Informatics
Taipei Medical University Federal University of São Paulo
Taipei, Taiwan Fellow, American College of Medical
Chapter 35: Consumer Patient Engagement and Informatics
Connectivity in Patients with Chronic Disease in the Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of
Community and at Home Medical Informatics
São Paulo, São Paulo
Pia Liljamo, PhD, RN Brazil
Development Manager Chapter 43: Global eHealth and Informatics
Oulu University Hospital Administrative Centre
Oulu, Finland Sarah Mattice, MS, RN
Chapter 42: Nursing Informatics Innovations Adjunct Instructor
to Improve Quality Patient Care on Many University of Colorado
Continents College of Nursing
Aurora, Colorado
Chapter 47: Social Media Tools in the Connected Age
Lynn M. Nagle, PhD, RN, FAAN Susan K. Newbold, PhD, RN-BC, FHIMSS, FAMIA,
Director, Digital Health and Virtual Learning FAAN
Adjunct Professor Owner
Faculty of Nursing Nursing Informatics Boot Camp
University of New Brunswick Franklin, Tennessee
Adjunct Professor Chapter 12: System Design Life Cycle: A Framework
University of Toronto
Western University Chris E. Nichols, MHA, RN
Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership LSSBB Program Manager
President Enterprise Intelligence & Data Solutions PMO
Nagle & Associates Inc. Defense Healthcare Management Systems PEO
Health Informatics Consulting Falls Church, Virginia
New Brunswick/Toronto, Canada Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector
Chapter 41: Nursing Data Science and Quality Nursing Informatics
Clinical Outcomes Hyeoun-Ae Park, PhD, RN, FACMI, FAAN, FIAHSI
Eun-Shim Nahm, PhD, RN, FAAN Professor
Professor Seoul National University
Organizational Systems and Adult Health School of Nursing and Medical Informatics
University of Maryland Interdisciplinary Program
School of Nursing Seoul, Republic of Korea
Baltimore, Maryland Chapter 35: Consumer Patient Engagement and
Chapter 44: Nursing Curriculum Reform and Connectivity in Patients with Chronic Disease in the
Healthcare Information Technology Community and at Home
Chapter 43: Global eHealth and Informatics
Naoki Nakashima, MD, PhD
Professor/Director, Medical Information Center Ellen Pollack, MSN, RN-BC
Kyushu University Hospital, Japan Chief Nursing Informatics Officer
Fukuoka City, Japan UCLA Health
Chapter 35: Consumer Patient Engagement and Los Angeles, California
Connectivity in Patient with Chronic Disease in the Chapter 29: Beyond EMR Implementation: Optimize
Community and at Home and Enhance
Lynn A. (Slepski) Nash, PhD, RN, PHCNS-BC, FAAN Susy Postal, DNP, RN-BC
Captain (Retired), U.S. Public Health Service Chief Health Informatics Officer
Gaithersburg, Maryland Indian Health Service
Chapter 33: Informatics Solutions for Emergency Rockville, Maryland
Planning and Response Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector Nursing
Informatics
Ramona Nelson, PhD, RN, BC, FAAN
Professor Emerita Diane S. Pravikoff, RN, PhD, FAAN
Slippery Rock University Vice President, Research (Retired)
President CINAHL Information Systems
Ramona Nelson Consulting Glendale, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Chapter 50: Information Literacy and Computerized
Chapter 6: Data and Data Processing Information Resources
Paula M. Procter, RN, CertED (FE), MSc, SFHEA, Virginia K. Saba, EdD, RN, FACMI, FAAN, LL
FBCS, CITP, FIMIANI, IAHSI CEO & President
Professor of Nursing Informatics Sabacare.com
Department of Nursing and Midwifery Arlington, Virginia
Sheffield Hallam University Distinguished Scholar, Adjunct
Sheffield, United Kingdom Georgetown University
Chapter 11: Social Determinants of Health, Electronic Washington, District of Columbia
Health Records, and Health Outcomes Professor, Adjunct
Uniformed Services University
Stephanie J. Raps, MSN, RN-BC Bethesda, Maryland
Doctoral Candidate Book Editor and Section Editor—Part 1: Nursing
Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing Informatics Technologies
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Part 4: Informatics Theory Standards
Major, U.S. Air Force Chapter 1: Historical Perspectives of Nursing
Bethesda, Maryland Informatics
Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector Nursing Appendix: Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System:
Informatics Overview, Applications, and Analyses
Theresa (Tess) Settergren, MHA, MA, RN-BC Mark D. Sugrue, RN-BC, MSN, FHIMSS
Director, Nursing Informatics (Retired) Managing Director, Clinical Delivery & Informatics
University of Minnesota Solutions
Minneapolis, Minnesota Commonwealth Medicine
Chapter 13: System and Functional Testing University of Massachusetts Medical School
Member, HIMSS North America Board of Directors
Roy L. Simpson, DNP, RN, DPNAP, FAAN, FACMI (2019–2020)
Assistant Dean, Technology Management and Chair, HIMSS North America Board of Directors
Clinical Professor (6/2020–2021)
Doctoral Program: Doctorate Nursing Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
Practice Chapter 38: Telehealth: Healthcare Evolution in the
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing Technology Age
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia Gerald N. Taylor, MD, MPH
Chapter 40: Big Data Analysis of Electronic Health Flight Surgeon, Diplomate American Board of
Record (EHR) Data Preventive Medicine
Captain, USPHS
Diane J. Skiba, PhD, FACMI
Coast Guard Chief Medical Informatics Officer
Professor Emeritus
Washington, District of Columbia
University of Colorado
Chapter 30: Federal Healthcare Sector
Aurora, Colorado
Nursing Informatics
Media Editor
Chapter 47: Social Media Tools in the Connected Age
Denise D. Tyler, DNP, MSN/MBA, RN-BC
Carolyn Sipes, PhD, CNS, APRN, PMP, RN-BC, Clinical Specialist
NEA-BC, FAAN Visalia, California
Professor, Core Faculty, PhD Program Section Editor—Part 3: System Life Cycle
Walden University Chapter 13: System and Functional Testing
Minneapolis, Minnesota Chapter 14: System Life Cycle Tools
Chapter 16: The Practice Specialty of Nursing
Informatics Barbara Van de Castle, DNP, APRN-CNS, OCN,
RN-BC
Kathleen Smith, MScEd, RN-BC, FHIMSS
Assistant Professor
Managing Partner
University of Maryland School of Nursing
Informatics Consulting and Continuing
Baltimore, Maryland
Education, LLC
Nurse Educator
Weeki Wachee, Florida
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Section Editor—Part 5: Policies and Quality
Johns Hopkins University
Measurement in Health Care
Baltimore, Maryland
Chapter 23: Nurse Scheduling and Credentialing
Chapter 15: Healthcare Project Management
Systems
In the years since the previous edition of Essentials in ultimately, build wisdom—into nursing practice, nursing
Nursing Informatics was published, U.S. hospitals have informatics is uniquely positioned to help lead the opti-
achieved nearly universal adoption of electronic health mization journey that will simplify data capture, promote
record (EHR) systems. Physician offices are only slightly sharing of data in a mobile environment, and create high-
behind in joining the digital ranks, and health profession- performing, patient-centric clinical information systems.
als across the nation now utilize EHR systems in daily The vision for a better future of healthcare is tightly
practice. The “HITECH Act” has forever changed health associated with the future of health information technol-
informatics, and we now face new challenges in improv- ogy, and data are the fuel for this journey. Thus, nurse
ing usability, interoperability, and learning capability of informaticists are critical healthcare leaders for the 21st
these systems. With the rise of artificial intelligence and century, experts in the right place at the right time, bring-
a need to reduce documentation burden required by cur- ing the clinical, technical, and leadership skills together to
rent EHR systems, we see significant opportunity and create effective partnerships among their numerous con-
responsibility for healthcare providers to address these stituencies—leadership teams, clinicians, data scientists,
challenges. Nurse informaticists are at the center of this information technologists, and more. Their role is central
transformational opportunity. in advancing value and science-driven healthcare, and so
Historically, care teams communicated primarily their work in moving healthcare informatics from data
through written notes in the patient chart. Paper repre- management to decision support is essential.
sented a technical barrier, as the best patient care is depen- In the 15 years since the call for EHRs was made in
dent on data availability over time, across locations, and the 2004 Presidential State of the Union message, we have
among healthcare team members—including the patient. witnessed rapid evolution of health information technol-
Access to the most accurate and complete information ogy and its use in healthcare systems. The next 15 years
remains vital, and nursing informaticists are leading much will bring the increasing convergence of data from myr-
of the work being done to improve the speed, accuracy, iad sources outside of the formal healthcare setting into
and utility of clinical information. the context of clinical care. We will move up the analytic
We have made progress in gaining nearly instant access hierarchy from descriptive to diagnostic, predictive, and
to patient data and evidence-based decision support that ultimately prescriptive and autonomous systems. Thus,
enables nurses, physicians, and other clinicians to make the future of this field promises both challenge and oppor-
better decisions about patient care. These technologies, tunity for prepared participants.
however, require continued optimization of the tech- Just as the field has evolved, so has nursing informat-
nology, the interoperability, and the workflow to drive ics. Its practitioners have already provided tremendous
improvement in user experience, reduce documentation energy, insight, and leadership in helping to establish the
burden, and improve patient outcomes. necessary infrastructure and in driving gains in healthcare
The accelerating demands for gathering and using technology competency, information literacy, and better
data to improve patient care and clinical operations have healthcare outcomes. Now more than ever, we believe
increased awareness of informatics as a core skill, inten- nursing informatics holds great promise to enhance the
sifying the need for clinicians to better understand these quality, continuity, value, and experience of healthcare.
increasingly ubiquitous technologies. This edition incor-
Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, MSHA, FACP, FACMI
porates updated teaching aids to help educators develop
President, Clinical Services Group and Chief Medical
more sophisticated users of technology, who are equipped
Officer
to improve processes and workflows that result in safer,
HCA Healthcare
more effective, and efficient patient care.
As the specialty that integrates nursing science, com- Jane D. Englebright, PhD, RN, CENP, FAAN
puter science, and information science to manage and Senior Vice President and Chief Nurse Executive
communicate data, information, and knowledge—and HCA Healthcare
xix
This seventh edition of Essentials of Nursing Informatics (Chap. 36), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (Chap. 37),
was initiated in response to requests by educators to pro- Telehealth: Healthcare Evolution in the Technology Age
vide a digital as well as an online version for faculty to use (Chap. 38), Nursing’s Role in Genomics and Information
in the development of their course work and by nurses Technology for Precision Health (Chap. 39), Big Data
and other users of the sixth edition. We expanded the Analysis of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data (Chap.
content to stay current, since the publisher does not plan 40), Nursing Data Science and Quality Clinical Outcomes
to generate a Study Guide for this version. To do so, we (Chap. 41), Nursing Informatics Innovations to Improve
have added Questions and Answers in each chapter as Quality Patient Care on Many Continents (Chap. 42), and
well as added a Summary in each of the nine parts and Global eHealth and Informatics (Chap. 43). We requested
one Appendix of the text. Further with the updated ANA authors to include updates on the digital health require-
Certification Examination, we returned the basic, detailed ments, policies, and regulations as a result of the COVID-19
Fundamental Chapters to update so that the chapters pandemic.
completely address their focus and scope. The updates in chapters include new references, poli-
Each of the nine parts of this edition has had a Section cies, and skills required by nurses in the field. A complete
Editor to assist the authors with their content: Part 1: update and an overview of the Federal Health Care Sector
Nursing Informatics Technologies—Carol J. Bickford Nursing Informatics are described by experts represent-
and Marisa L. Wilson; Part 2: System Standards— ing all the federal sectors. The Veteran’s Administration
Virginia K. Saba and Joyce Sensmeier; Part 3: System Nursing Plan of Care Framework is described. Instead
Life Cycle—Denise D. Tyler; Part 4: Informatics Theory of an International Section, the nurse authors from
Standards—Virginia K. Saba; Part 5: Policies and Quality Australia, South Korea, Finland, South America, Canada,
Measures in Healthcare—Kathleen Smith; Part 6: Nursing the United Kingdom, and North America have described
Practice Applications—Heather Carter-Templeton; Part their expertise in Six Sigma, Measuring and Evaluating
7: Advanced Applications for the Fourth Nursing IT Quality, describing Consumer Patient Engagement and
Revolution—Kathleen A. McCormick; Part 8: Educational Connectivity in Patients with Chronic Diseases in the
Applications—Diane J. Skiba; and Part 9: Research Community and in their Home, and Global eHealth ini-
Applications—Veronica D. Feeg. For this edition, faculty tiatives in Nursing Informatics. Their chapters represent
recommended that we write a part summary introducing the expertise that they bring to Essentials of Nursing
important concepts in each part. Informatics, seventh edition.
This book was written by experts in nursing and infor- Our new Media Editor, Diane J. Skiba, is considering
matics, but when we were editing this book, the most including a website for slides, abstracts, and any other
unusual circumstances occurred. The COVID-19 pan- materials of interest that the authors determined would
demic swept across continents. Nurses in practice were support the faculty and/or enhance the educational pro-
stretched by large volumes of critical care to a large cohort cess. We feel that this new edition will provide the new
of patients. Unique digital concepts were developed on theories, federal policies, and new content that have
site, implemented to large groups of healthcare profes- impacted the field of Nursing Informatics that are con-
sionals in the ICU, the hospital, nearby local pop-up hospi- tinually changing.
tals, primary care offices, networks of specialty healthcare Virginia and Kathleen have felt that they have, dur-
workers, and skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes. ing the past 20+ years, and their six editions, with their
The mandate for interconnected healthcare, telehealth, specialist authors in the field, provided the most current
and digital education quickly became an adopted norm. and reliable information as this new Nursing Specialty
Several new chapters were added in Part 7: Advanced advanced, grew, and changed with the technological
Applications for the Fourth Nursing IT Revolution advancements that impacted on the changing healthcare
(Kathleen McCormick—Section Editor). This part has the processes. We feel honored that this text has been used by
following chapters: New Models of Healthcare Delivery the key administrative leaders, educators, and researchers
xxi
in the field. We feel that this text has helped keep Nursing teach the content, assist nurses with the certification
Informatics in the forefront of our discipline. We hope you requirements, and help us advance Nursing Informatics in
will be as pleased with this seventh edition as you have the 21st century.
been with the past editions. We hope it will help faculty
Dr. Virginia K. Saba
Dr. Kathleen A. McCormick
This seventh edition of Essentials of Nursing Informatics is We also want to especially remember those authors and
dedicated to all the section editors, chapter authors, and other supporters of Nursing Informatics who have left us
their co-authors. Each of these prestigious contributors last year: Helen Connors, Kathleen (Milholland) Hunter,
are experts in their respective positions, implementing Margaret Ross Kraft, Melissa Barthold, Julie McAfoos,
systems, policies, research, and educational programs to Andrew McLaughlin, Dr. Donald, Lindberg, and others
support and advance Nursing Informatics in this country who have left their mark on the field.
and abroad. The authors also acknowledge their families because
We acknowledge our international colleagues in without their encouragement and help this book would
Nursing Informatics. We also acknowledge the McGraw not be a reality. We thank the Lord for giving us the oppor-
Hill staff Susan Barnes Oldenburg, Richard Ruzycka, and tunity to embark on a seventh edition and for the help we
Christina Thomas and their contractors Touseen Qadri received in completing it.
from MPS Limited who contributed to the editing of this
book, completing the production of this book, as well as
supporting the expansion of the book with new resources. Dr. Virginia K. Saba
Dr. Kathleen A. McCormick
xxiii
A new feature of the seventh edition of Essentials in Nursing Informatics is a part summary that provides an overview
for each of the nine parts of this edition. Each part represents a specific focus on this Nursing Informatics specialty and
provides appropriate information in separate chapters. The coronavirus pandemic that occurred during the publishing
process also allowed some authors to address its impact on specific practice areas.
The informatics nurse uses data to create information and knowledge to support best care practices. The informatics
nurse engages the data to information to knowledge process using technology to support patient care, increase effi-
ciency, ensure quality, and improve outcomes. In order to do this, the informatics nurse needs to understand the founda-
tions of computer hardware and software as well as the processes for managing data and information. Understanding
how computer hardware and software works is core to fulfilling the tenets of nursing informatics as outlined in the
American Nurses Association (ANA) Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, Second Edition. Part 1 content
description follows.
Chapter 1, entitled Historical Perspectives in Nursing Informatics, authored by Dr. Virginia K. Saba, Dr. Bonnie L. Westra,
and Dr. Julie J. Brixey, provides a historical overview of Nursing Informatics (NI) during 10-year period starting in the 1960s
with the introduction of computer technology in healthcare. The chapter provides landmark events that influenced the
growth of NI as a new nursing specialty. It provides an update on new activities since the previous edition, including
new information on where and who were involved in advancing this specialty. It includes the new criteria, established
by the NI pioneers, that addressed nursing practice standards, educational content, certification requirements, etc. It also
updated the Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics table with the name of
the major NI pioneer involved.
Chapter 2, Computer Systems Basics—Hardware, authored by Dr. Mary L. McHugh, provides a helpful overview of basic
computer hardware components, their characteristics, and functions. Because computers are ubiquitous in everyone’s
personal life and the healthcare industry, an understanding of the operations of such an infrastructure is foundational for
the informatics nurse. The five basic types of computers and the associated internal components and diverse peripherals
are described, as is the critical connectivity provided by network hardware.
• OBJECTIVES
1. Identify a brief historical perspective of nursing informatics.
2. Explore lessons learned from the pioneers in nursing informatics.
3. List the major landmark events and milestones of nursing informatics.
• KEY WORDS
Computers
Computer Literacy
Computer Systems
Data Standards
Electronic Health Records (EHR)
Healthcare Information Technology (HIT)
Information Systems
Internet
Nursing Informatics (NI)
devices to cloud storage. Furthermore, there is less need demonstrate nursing’s commitment to Computers and
to develop written instructions for software programs Nursing including Information Technology.
as today’s applications are icon-based, user-friendly, and
menu-driven. Additionally, video tutorials are available for Prior to 1960s Computers were first developed in the
many programs. Touch-screen devices are replacing the late 1930s to early 1940s. As computers have evolved,
need for a mouse. computing power has increased. This was attributed to
Today, computers in nursing are used to manage the increasing number of transistors or chips placed in
patient care information, monitor quality, and evaluate an integrated circuit. In the mid-1960s Gordon Moore
outcomes. Computers and networks are also being used noted that the number doubled approximately every two
for communicating (sending and receiving) data and mes- years. This argument has become known as Moore’s law
sages via the Internet, accessing resources, and interacting (Techopedia, 2019).
with patients on the Web. Nurses are increasingly using Use of computers in the healthcare industry did not
systems for planning, budgeting, and policy-making for occur until the 1950s and 1960s. During this time, there
patient care services. Computers are also used to docu- were only a few experts nationally and internationally
ment and process real-time plans of care, support nursing who formed a cadre of pioneers that adapted computers
research, test new systems, design new knowledge data- to healthcare and nursing which was undergoing major
bases, develop data warehouses, and advance the role of changes. Several professional advances provided the impe-
nursing in the healthcare industry and nursing science. tus for the profession to embrace computers—a new tech-
Moreover, computers are enhancing nursing education nological tool. Computers were initially used in healthcare
and distance learning with new media modalities. facilities for basic office, administrative, and financial
This chapter is an updated and revised version of the accounting functions. These early computers used punch
chapter “Historical Perspectives of Nursing Informatics” cards to store data and card readers to read computer pro-
(Saba & Westra, 2015) published in the 6th edition of the grams, sort, and prepare data for processing. Computers
Essentials of Nursing Informatics (Saba & McCormick, were linked together and operated by paper tape using
2015). In this chapter the significant events influencing teletypewriters to print their output. As computer technol-
the growth of nursing informatics (NI) as a nursing spe- ogy advanced, healthcare technologies also advanced. The
cialty are analyzed according to (1) seven time periods, major advances are listed chronologically in Table 1-1.
(2) a view of the newest technological innovations used by
nurses, (3) a description of Nursing Informatics Pioneers 1960s During the 1960s the uses of computer technology
including a synthesis of lessons learned from videotaped in healthcare settings began to be explored. Questions such
interviews with NI pioneers, (4) electronic health records as “Why use computers?” and “What should be comput-
from a historical perspective, and (5) landmark events in erized?” were discussed. Nursing practice standards were
nursing and computers, with Table 1-1 listing those events reviewed, and nursing resources were analyzed. Studies
that influenced the introduction of computers into the were conducted to determine how computer technology
nursing profession including key “computer/informatics” could be utilized effectively in the healthcare industry and
nurse that directed the activity. Also, Table 1-2 lists cur- what areas of nursing should be automated. The nurses’ sta-
rent organizations supporting nursing informatics. tion in the hospital was viewed as the hub of information
exchange; therefore, numerous initial computer applica-
tions were developed and implemented in this location.
By the mid-1960s, clinical practice presented nurses
MAJOR HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES with new opportunities for computer use. Increasingly
OF NURSING AND COMPUTERS complex patient care requirements and the prolifera-
tion of intensive care units (ICUs) required that nurses
Seven Time Periods
become super users of computer technology as nurses
Computers were introduced into the nursing profession monitored patients’ status via cardiac monitors and insti-
over 40 years ago. Major milestones of nursing are inter- tuted treatment regimens through ventilators and other
woven with the advancement of computer and informa- computerized devices such as infusion pumps. A signifi-
tion technologies, the increased need for nursing data, cant increase in time spent by nurses documenting patient
development of nursing applications, and changes mak- care, in some cases estimated at 40%, as well as a noted rise
ing the nursing profession an autonomous discipline. The in medication administration errors prompted the need to
key activities and events for each decade are presented investigate emerging hospital computer-based informa-
to provide a background and the sequence of events to tion systems (Sherman, 1965; Wolkodoff, 1963).
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics
Year(s) Title/Event Sponsor(s) Coordinator/Chair/NI Representative(s)
1973 First Invitational Conference: Management National League for Nursing (NLN) and Goldie Levenson (NLN)
Information Systems (MISs) for Public and Division of Nursing, Public Health Virginia K. Saba (DN/PHS)
Community Health Agencies Service (DN/PHS), Arlington, VA
1974 to 1975 Five Workshops in USA on MISs for Public and NLN and DN/PHS, selected US Cities Goldie Levenson (NLN)
Community Health Agencies Virginia K. Saba (DN/PHS)
1976 State-of-the-Art Conference on Management for NLN and DN/PHS, Washington, DC Goldie Levenson (NLN)
Public and Community Health Agencies Virginia K. Saba (DN/PHS)
1977 First Research: State-of-the-Art Conference on University of Illinois College of Nursing, Harriet H. Werley (UIL)
Nursing Information Systems Chicago, IL Margaret Grier (UIL)
1977 First undergraduate academic course: Computers The State University of New York at Judith Ronald (SUNY, Buffalo)
and Nursing Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
1979 First Military Conference on Computers in Nursing TRIMIS Army Nurse Consultant Team, Dorothy Pocklington (TRIMIS Army)
Walter Reed Hospital, Washington, DC Linda Guttman (ANC)
1980 First Workshop: Computer Usage in Healthcare University of Akron, School of Nursing, Virginia Newbern (UA/SON)
5
ch01.indd 6
6
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics (continued)
Year(s) Title/Event Sponsor(s) Coordinator/Chair/NI Representative(s)
1983 First: Nursing Model for Patient Care and TRIMIS Program Office, Washington, DC Karen Rieder (NNC)
Acuity System Dena Nortan (NNC)
ch01.indd 7
1983 to 2012 Initiated International Symposium: 1983—Amsterdam, Netherlands 1983—Maureen Scholes, First Chair
Nursing Use of Computers and 1985—Calgary, Canada 1985—Kathryn J. Hannah and Evelyn J.
Information Science, International Guillemin
Medical Informatics Association
(IMIA) Working Group 8 on Nursing
Informatics (NI).
2008 to 2014 Renamed: IMIA Nursing Informatics, 1988—Dublin, Ireland Noel Daley and Maureen Scholes
2014 to Present Special Interest Group (IMIA/NI-SIG) 1991—Melbourne, Australia Evelyn S. Hovenga and Joan Edgecumbe
(Q 2 Years)
1994—San Antonio, TX, USA Susan Grobe and Virginia K. Saba
1997—Stockholm, Sweden Ulla Gerdin and Marianne Tallberg
2000—Auckland, New Zealand Robyn Carr and Paula Rocha
2003—Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Heimar Marin and Eduardo Marques
2006—Seoul, Korea Hyeoun-Ae Park
2009—Helsinki, Finland Anneli Ensio and Kaija Saranto
2012—Montreal, Canada Patricia Abbott (JHU)
2014—Taipei, Taiwan Polun Chang
2016—Geneva, Switzerland Patrick Weber
(continued)
22-10-2020 03:11:53
7
ch01.indd 8
8
P art 1 • N ursing I nformatics T echnologies
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics (continued)
Year(s) Title/Event Sponsor(s) Coordinator/Chair/NI Representative(s)
1985 NLN initiated First National Forum: National League for Nursing, New York City, NY Susan Grobe, Chair
Computers in Healthcare and Nursing First Exec. Board:
Diane Skiba
Judy Ronald
Bill Holzemer
Roy Simpson
Pat Tymchyshyn
1985 First Annual Seminar on Computers and NYU Medical Center, NY, NY Patsy Marr New York University (NYU)
Nursing Practice Janet Kelly (NYU)
1985 First Invitational Nursing Minimum Data University of Illinois School of Nursing, Chicago, IL Harriet Werley (UIL)
Set (NMDS) Conference Norma Lang (UM)
1985 Early academic course: Essentials of Georgetown University School of Nursing, Virginia K. Saba (GU)
Computers, in Undergraduate and Washington, DC
Graduate Programs
1985 to 1990 Early 5-year Project: Continuing Nursing Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), Eula Aiken (SREB)
Education: Computer Technology, Focus: Atlanta, GA
Nursing Faculty
1985 First Test Authoring Program (TAP) Addison-Wesley Publishing, New York, NY William Holzemer (UCSF)
1985 First Artificial Intelligence System for Creighton On-line Multiple Medical Education Sheila Ryan, Dean and Faculty Professor,
Nursing Services (COMMES), Creighton University Steven Evans, Developer
1986 Two early Microcomputer Institutes for Georgetown University, School of Nursing, Virginia K. Saba (GU)
Nurses Washington, DC Dorothy Pocklington (USL)
University of Southwest Louisiana Nursing Diane Skiba (BU)
Department, Lafayette, LA
1986 Established first nurse educator’s newslet- Christine Bolwell and Stewart Publishing, Christine Bolwell, Editor
ter: Micro World Alexandria, VA
1986 CIN First Indexed in MEDLINE and CINAHL J. B. Lippincott Publisher, Philadelphia, PA Gary Hales, Editor
1986 First NI Pyramid—NI Research Model Published in CIN Indexed in MEDLINE and CINAHL Patricia Schwirian (OSU)
1987 Initiated and Created Interactive Videodisc American Journal of Nursing, New York, NY Mary Ann Rizzolo (AJN)
Software Programs
1987 International Working Group Task Force on IMIA/NI Working Group 8 and Swedish Ulla Gerdin (NI)
Education Federation, Stockholm, Sweden Kristina Janson Jelger and Hans Peterson
(Swedish Federation)
22-10-2020 03:11:53
ch01.indd 9
1987 Videodisc for Health Conference: Stewart Publishing, Alexandria, VA Scott Stewart, Publisher
Interactive Healthcare Conference
1988 Recommendation #3: Support Automated National Commission on Nursing Implementation Vivian DeBack, Chair
Information Systems. Project (NCNIP), Secretary’s Commission on
Nursing Shortage
1988 Priority Expert Panel E: Nursing Informatics National Center for Nursing Research, National Judy Ozbolt, Chair
Task Force Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
1988 First Set of Criteria for Vendors ANA (American Nurses Association/Council on Mary McHugh
Nursing Science)/CANS Chair
Rita Zielstorff
Jacqueline Clinton
1989 Invitational Conference: Nursing National Commission on Nursing Implementation Vivian DeBack, Chair
Information Systems, Washington, DC Project (NCNIP), ANA, NLN, and NIS Industry
1989 to Present Initiated First Graduate Programs with University of Maryland School of Nursing, Barbara Heller, Dean
Specialty in Nursing Informatics, Baltimore, MD Program Chairs: Carol Gassert, Patricia
Master’s and Doctorate Abbott, Kathleen Charters, Judy Ozbolt,
and Eun-Shim Nahm
1989 to 2009 Virtual Learning Resources Fuld Institute for Technology in Nursing Julie McAfoos, Pioneer Software Developer.
Education (FITNE)
9
ch01.indd 10
10
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics (continued)
Year(s) Title/Event Sponsor(s) Coordinator/Chair/NI Representative(s)
1993 Formed: Denver Free-Net University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Diane Skiba (UC), Developer
Denver, CO
1993 Priority Expert Panel E: Nursing Informatics National Center for Nursing Research (NCNR/NIH), Judy Ozbolt, Chair
Report: Nursing Informatics: Enhancing Bethesda, MD
Patient Care
1994 ANA-NET Online American Nurses Association, Washington, DC Kathy Milholland (ANA)
1994 Four Nursing Educators Workshops on Southern Council on Collegiate Regional Eula Aiken (SREB)
Computers in Education Education and University of Maryland, Mary Etta Mills (UMD)
Washington, DC; Baltimore, MD; Atlanta, GA;
Augusta, GA
1994 Next Generation: Clinical Information Tri-Council for Nursing and Kellogg Foundation, Sheila Ryan, Chair
Systems Conference Washington, DC
1994, 2008, and First Nursing: Scope and Standards of ANA Database Steering Committee Kathy Milholland (ANA), Carol Bickford (ANA)
2014 Nursing Informatics Practice
1995 First International NI Teleconference: Three International NI Experts: Sue Sparks (USA)
Countries Linked Together Nursing Informatics, USA Evelyn Hovenga (AU)
Health Information System, Australia Robyn Carr (NZ)
(continued)
11
ch01.indd 12
12
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics (continued)
Year(s) Title/Event Sponsor(s) Coordinator/Chair/NI Representative(s)
1999 Inaugural Virtual Graduation: Online Post- GSN, Uniformed Services University Faye Abdellah (USU)
Masters: ANP Certificate Program VA Tele-Conference Network, Bethesda, MD Virginia K. Saba (USU)
Eight Nationwide VA MCs Charlotte Beason (VA)
22-10-2020 03:11:53
ch01.indd 13
1999 First Meeting: Nursing Data Standards Project Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Roberto Rodriquez (PAHO)
for Central Organization (PAHO) and Brazil Washington, DC Heimar Marin (Brazil)
2000 First, Director of Professional Services Healthcare Information Management System Joyce Sensmeier
Society (HIMSS)
2000 ICNP Programme Office Established International Council of Nurses, Geneva, Amy Coenen, First Nursing Director
Switzerland
2000 Computer-Based Patient Record Institute CPRI, Los Angeles, CA Virginia K. Saba, Nursing Chair
(CPRI) 2000 Conference
2001 AMIA’s Nursing Informatics Leaders University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI Pattie Brennan, President
Columbia University, New York, NY Suzanne Bakken, Program Chair
2002 ICNP Strategic Advisory Group Established ICN, Geneva, Switzerland Amy Coenen, Director
2002 Conference: Strategy for Health IT and Medical Records Institute (MRI), Boston, MA Peter Waegemann, President
eHealth Vendors
2002 AAN Conference: Using Innovative American Academy of Nursing, Washington, DC Margaret McClure, Chair
Technology Linda Bolton, Co-Chair
Nellie O’Gara, Co-Chair
2002 Initiated AAN Expert Panel on Nursing American Academy of Nursing Annual Virginia K. Saba, Co-Chair
Informatics Conference, Naples, FL Ida Androwich, Co-Chair
Subcommittee
(continued)
13
ch01.indd 14
14
TABLE 1.1 Landmark Events and Pioneers in Computers and Nursing, and Nursing Informatics (continued)
2004 Office of the National Coordinator for National Coordinators First Coordinator:
Health Information Technology (ONC) Dr. David Brailer
Established
Dr. Robert Kolodner
Dr. David Blumenthal
Dr. Farzad Mostashari
Dr. Karen DeSalvo,
Nominated Directors.
2004 Technology Informatics Guiding Education National Members Marion Ball, Chair
Reform (TIGER)—Phase I Online Teleconferences Diane Skiba, Co-Chair
2006 First TIGER Summit 100 Invited Representatives from 70 Healthcare Marion Ball, Chair
Organizations; Summit Held at USU, Bethesda, Diane Skiba, Co-Chair
MD
2006 Revitalized NI Archival Collection—Initiated AMIA/NIWG Executive Committee Kathleen McCormick, Chair
Solicitation of Pioneer NI Documents Bonnie Westra, Co-Chair
Virginia K. Saba, Consultant
2005/2008/2009 ICNP Version 1.0, Version 1.1, and Version 2 ICN, Geneva, Switzerland Amy Coenen, Director
2006/2008 Symposium on Nursing Informatics Brazil Medical Informatics Society Heimar Marin, Chair
2007/2008 First National Nursing Terminology (ANSI-HITSP)American National Standards Virginia K. Saba and Colleagues, HITSP
Standard: Clinical Care Classification Institute’ and ‘Healthcare Information Committee Developers
(CCC) System Technology System Panel: Bio-surveillance
Committee HITSP Recommended and HHS
Secretary Approved
2007 to Present ANIA/CARING Joint Conferences Las Vegas, Washington, DC Victoria Bradley, Initial Chair
2009 to Present American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ONC National Health Information Technology Focus on Hospital HIT/EHR (Healthcare
of 2009—Health Information Technology Committee: Information Technology/Electronic
for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH Healthcare Records) Systems Integrated
Act of 2009); ONC Formed Two National and Interoperable Terminology Standards
Committees, Each with One Nurse Health Policy Committee Judy Murphy, (Aurora Health Systems, MI)
Health Standards Committee Connie Delaney (UMN):
2009 ICNP recognized by WHO as First ICN and WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Amy Coenen, Director
International Nursing Terminology
2010 to Present Nursing Informatics Boot Camp Hospitals, Schools of Nursing, Vendors, Healthcare Susan K. Newbold, President
Member Organization
22-10-2020 03:11:53
ch01.indd 15
2010 Initiated: Doctor of Nursing Practice University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN Connie Delaney, Dean SON, UMN
Specialty in Informatics Bonnie Westra, Chair
2010 American Nursing Informatics Association ANIA and CARING Victoria Bradley, First President
(ANIA and CARING) Merged
2011 Tiger Initiative Foundation Incorporated TIGER Initiative Patricia Hinton Walker, Chair
2011 First Nurse as Deputy National Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) Judy Murphy
Coordinator for Programs & Policy at the
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health IT (ONC)
2012 to Present ANIA New Re-Named and First Annual ANIA with merged CARING Victoria Bradley, President
ANIA Conference Patricia Sengstack, President (2013/2014)
2013 First NI Nurse to be President of IMIA IMIA Hyeoun-Ae Park
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
2013 to 2019 Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Hospital Corp of America (HCA) Nashville, TN Virginia K. Saba Chair Jane Englebright
(Q2 years) User Meetings Co-Chair
2013 to Present Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science University of Minnesota School of Nursing Connie Delaney, Chair
Initiative Annual Conferences Bonnie Westra
15
16 P art 1 • N ursing I nformatics T echnologies
Care Coordination Identify shareable and comparable data across settings to support care
coordination activities and improve patient outcomes.
Clinical Data Analytics Demonstrate the value of sharable and comparable nurse-sensitive data
to support practice and translational research for transforming health
care and improving patient quality and safety.
Context of Care Develop the test Big Data set using the Kruchten 4+1 Model and Unified
Modeling Language (UML) to introduce an integrating and harmonizing
framework for sharable and comparable nurse data across the care con-
tinuum that incorporates the Nursing Minimum Management Data Set
(NMMDS) and links key Workgroup activities.
Education Strengthen informatics education at the graduate and specialty levels and
the ability of educators who teach informatics to nursing student so
that we can achieve the outcomes of shareable and comparable nursing
data through the work of nurses at the point of care.
Encoding and Modeling Develop and disseminate LOINC and SNOMED Clinical Terms for electronic
health record nursing assessments, and incorporate them into a frame-
work and repository for dissemination.
Engage and Equip All Nurses in Health IT Policy Equip nurses with education, tools, and resources and engage them as
knowledgeable advocates for health IT policy efforts important to
nursing.
E-Repository Develop and implement a repository designed to collect nursing infor-
matics best evidence in the form of documents, surveys, instruments,
algorithms, for example.
Mobile Health Explore the use of mobile health tools and data for nurses including both
nursing-generated data and patient-generated data. Identify and sup-
port activities and resources to address unmet needs and create oppor-
tunities to utilize mHealth data within nursing workflows.
Nursing Value Measure the value of nursing care as well as the contribution of individual
nurses to clinical outcomes and cost. Develop big data techniques for
secondary data analysis that will provide metrics to monitor quality,
costs, performance, effectiveness, and efficiency of nursing care.
Social Determinants of Health Support the inclusion, interoperability, and data exchange of Social
Determinants of Health (SDOH) data in electronic health records, per-
sonal and m-health tools, and community and public health portals
across care settings. Empower nurses (practice, education, research, pol-
icy) to use SDOH data as context for planning care. Develop a roadmap
to engage nurses to improve population health through large-scale
adoption of SDOH.
Transforming Documentation Explore ways to decrease the nursing documentation burden and serve
up the information already in the electronic health record at the right
time in the workflow to support evidence-based and personalized care.
Elevate purpose-driven, role-based, patient-centric, evidence-informed
documentation transformation to capture nurse observations and inter-
ventions, and drive purposeful secondary-use and precision nursing.
1970s During the late 1960s through the 1970s, hospitals federal agencies (Public Health Service, Army Nurse
began developing computer-based information systems Corps) and several university schools of nursing provided
which initially focused on computerized physician order educational conferences and workshops on the state-of-
entry (CPOE) and results reporting; pharmacy, labora- the-art regarding computer technology and its influence
tory, and radiology reports; information for financial and on nursing. During this time, the Clinical Center at the
managerial purposes; and physiologic monitoring systems National Institutes of Health implemented the Technicon
in the intensive care units; and a few systems started to Data System (TDS) system; one of the earliest clinical
include care planning, decision support, and interdisci- information systems (called Eclipsys & Allscripts) was the
plinary problem lists. While the content contained in early first system to include nursing practice protocols.
hospital information systems frequently was not specific to In addition to the use of computers, advancement was
nursing practice, a few systems did provide a few pioneer underway for other technologies and/or devices used by
nurses with a foundation on which to base future nurs- nurses. For example, the first point-of-care blood glucose
ing information systems (Blackmon et al., 1982; Collen, monitor became available for use in the clinical setting in
1995; Ozbolt & Bakken, 2003; Romano, McCormick, & 1970 (Clarke & Foster, 2012). The devices became smaller
McNeely, 1982). Regardless of the focus, which remained and more widespread in the 1980s.
primarily on medical practice, nurses often were involved
in implementing health information technology (HIT) 1980s In the 1980s, the field of nursing informatics
systems. exploded and became visible in the healthcare industry
Interest in computers and nursing began to emerge and nursing. Technology challenged creative profession-
in public health, home health, and education during the als in the use of computers in nursing. As computer sys-
1960s to 1970s. Automation in public health agencies tems were implemented, the needs of nursing took on a
began as a result of pressure to standardize data collec- cause-and-effect modality; that is, as new computer tech-
tion procedures and provide state-wide reports on the nologies emerged and as computer architecture advanced,
activities and health of the public (Parker, Ausman, & the need for nursing software evolved. It became apparent
Ovedovitz, 1965). In the 1970s, conferences sponsored that the nursing profession needed to update its practice
by the Division of Nursing (DN), Public Health Service standards and determine specific data standards, vocabu-
(PHS), and the National League for Nursing (NLN) helped laries, and classification schemes that could be used for
public health and home health nurses understand the the computer-based patient record systems.
importance of nursing data and their relationship to new In the 1980s, the microcomputer or personal computer
Medicare and Medicaid legislation requirements passed (PC) emerged. This revolutionary technology made com-
in 1966. The conferences provided information on the puters more accessible, affordable, and usable by nurses
usefulness of computers for capturing and aggregating and other healthcare providers. The PC brought comput-
home health and public health information. Additional ing power to the workplace and, more importantly, to the
government-sponsored conferences focused on educa- point of care. Also, the PCs served as dumb terminals
tional uses of computers for nurses (Public Health Service, linked to the mainframe computers and as stand-alone
1976). Simultaneously, hospitals and public health agen- systems (workstations). The PCs were user-friendly and
cies embarked on investigating computers and nursing; allowed nurses to design and program their own applica-
the opportunity to improve education using computer tions. The influence of computer technology extended to
technology commenced. Bitzer (1966) reported on one the introduction of devices to improve patient safety. For
of the first uses of a computerized teaching system called example, the automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) were
PLATO, which was implemented to teach classes in off- introduced in the 1980s (Grissinger, 2012). The computer-
campus sites as an alternative to traditional classroom controlled ADCs replaced medication carts and drug floor
education. stock. Tracking of medications occurred at the point of
The early nursing networks, which were conceived care. The use of ADCs in the clinical setting has resulted
at health informatics organizational meetings, helped to in the reduction of medication errors.
expand nursing awareness of computers and the impact Starting in 1981, national and international confer-
HIT could have on practice. The state of technology ini- ences and workshops were conducted by an increasing
tially limited opportunities for nurses to contribute to the number of nursing pioneers to help nurses understand
HIT design, but as technology evolved toward the later part and get involved in this new emerging nursing specialty.
of the 1970s and as nurses provided workshops nationally, Also during the 1980s, invitational conferences were
nurses gained confidence that they could use computers conducted to develop nursing data sets and vocabular-
to improve practice. The national nursing organization’s ies as well as numerous workshops were conducted at
universities to introduce this new specialty into nursing quality of care (Shortliffe, Perreault, Wiederhold, & Pagan,
education. During this period, many mainframe health- 2003). Advances in relational databases, client-server
care information systems (HISs) emerged with nursing architectures, and new programming methods created the
subsystems. These systems documented several aspects opportunity for better application development at lower
of the patient record, namely, provider order entry and costs. Legislative activity in the mid-1990s paved the way
results reporting, the Kardex reporting, vital signs, and for EHRs through the Health Insurance Portability and
other systems-documented narrative nursing notes using Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 (public-law 104-191),
word-processing software packages. Discharge planning emphasizing standardized transactions, and privacy and
systems were developed and used as referrals to commu- security of patient-identifiable information (Gallagher,
nity, public, and home healthcare facilities for the contin- 2010). The complexity of technology, workflow analysis,
uum of care. and regulations shaped new roles for nursing.
Nurses began presenting at multidisciplinary confer- In 1992, the ANA recognized nursing informatics as
ences and formed their own working groups within HIT a new nursing specialty with a separate Scope of Nursing
organizations, such as the first Nursing Special Interest Informatics Practice Standards, and also established a
Group on Computers which met for the first time dur- specific credentialing examination for it (ANA, 2008).
ing SCAMC (Symposium on Computer Applications in Numerous local, national, and international organiza-
Medical Care) in 1981. As medical informatics evolved, tions provided a forum for networking and continuing
nursing began focusing on what was unique about nursing education for nurses involved with informatics (Sackett &
within the context of informatics. Resolutions were passed Erdley, 2002). The demand for NI expertise increased in
by the American Nurses Association (ANA) regarding the healthcare industry and other settings where nurses
computer use in nursing and in 1985, the ANA approved functioned, and the technology revolution continued to
the formation of the Council on Computer Applications in impact the nursing profession.
Nursing (CCAN). One of the first activities the CCAN exec- The need for computer-based nursing practice stan-
utive board initiated was to solicit several early pioneers to dards, data standards, nursing minimum data sets, and
develop monographs on the status of computers in nursing national databases emerged concurrently with the need
practice, education, research, and management. The CCAN for a unified nursing language, including nomenclatures,
board developed a yearly Computer Nurse Directory on the vocabularies, taxonomies, and classification schemes
known nurses involved in the field, conducted computer (Westra, Delaney, Konicek, & Keenan, 2008). Nurse
applications demonstrations at the ANA annual confer- administrators started to demand that the HITs include
ences, and shared information with their growing members nursing care protocols and nurse educators continued to
in the first CCAN newsletter Input-Output. During this require the use of innovative technologies for all levels
time NI newsletters, journals, and several books, such as the and types of nursing and patient education. Also, nurse
first edition of this book Essentials of Computers for Nurses researchers required knowledge representation, deci-
published in 1986, were used for educational courses intro- sion support, and expert systems based on standards that
duced in the academic nursing programs, and workshops allowed for aggregated data (Bakken, 2006).
conducted on computers and nursing. The CCAN became In 1997, the ANA developed the Nursing Information
a very powerful force in integrating computer applications and Data Set Evaluation Center (NIDSEC) to evaluate and
into the nursing profession. In 1988, the CCAN commis- recognize nursing information systems (ANA, 1997). The
sioned three NI experts to prepare a set of criteria on the purpose was to guide the development and selection of
integration of nursing practice for EHR vendors to fol- nursing systems that included standardized nursing ter-
low (Zielstorff, McHugh, & Clinton, 1988). In 1989, the minologies integrated throughout the system whenever
ANA renamed the CCAN to the Steering Committee on it was appropriate. There were four high-level standards:
Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice, which later (a) inclusion of ANA-recognized terminologies; (b) link-
became the Committee for Nursing Practice Information ages among concepts represented by the terminologies
Infrastructure (CNPII). The purpose of the CNPII was to retained in a logical and reusable manner; (c) data included
support development and recognition of national health in a clinical data repository; and (d) general system char-
data standards (Coenen et al., 2001). acteristics. The Certification Commission for Health
Information Technology (CCHIT) had similar criteria
1990s By the 1990s, large integrated healthcare delivery for the EHR certification, which was later adopted by the
systems evolved, further creating the need for informa- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
tion across healthcare facilities within these large systems Technology (ONC); however, nursing data was no longer
to standardize processes, control costs, and assure the included. ANA was ahead of its time in its thinking and
development. The criteria are now under revision by the administration (BCMA) system was first implemented
ANA to support nurses to advocate their requirements for in 2000 in an acute care hospital to electronically cap-
the emerging HIT systems. ture medication management (Wideman, Whittler, &
Technology rapidly changed in the 1990s, increasing Anderson, 2005). The RFID also emerged to help nurses
its use within and across nursing units as well as across find equipment or scan patients to assure that all surgical
healthcare facilities. Computer hardware—PCs—con- equipment is removed from inside patients before surgi-
tinued to get smaller and computer notebooks were cal sites are closed (Westra, 2009). Smaller mobile devices
becoming affordable, increasing the types of computer with wireless or Internet access such as notebooks, tablet
technology available for nurses to use. Linking computers PCs, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and smart cellu-
through networks both within hospitals and health sys- lar telephones increased access to information for nurses
tems as well as across systems facilitated the flow of patient within hospitals and in the community. The development
information to provide better care. By 1995, the Internet and subsequent refinement of voice over Internet protocol
began providing access to information and knowledge (VoIP) provided voice cost-effective communication for
databases to be integrated into desktop computer systems. healthcare organizations.
It revolutionized information technologies. The Internet The Internet which appeared in 1995 provided a
moved into the mainstream social milieu with electronic means for the development of clinical applications. Also,
mail (e-mail), file transfer protocol (FTP), Gopher, and databases for EHRs could be hosted remotely on the
Telnet, and World Wide Web (WWW) protocols greatly Internet, decreasing costs of implementing EHRs. Remote
enhanced its usability and user-friendliness (Saba, 1996; monitoring of multiple critical care units from a single
Sparks, 1996). The Internet was used for high-performance site increased access for safe and effective cardiac care
computing and communication (HPCC) or the “informa- (Rajecki, 2008). Home healthcare increasingly partnered
tion superhighway” and facilitated data exchange between with information technology for the provision of patient
computerized patient record systems across facilities and care. Telehealth applications, a recognized specialty for
settings over time. The Internet led to improvements in nursing since the late 1990s, provided a means for nurses
networks, and a browser, WWW, allowed organizations to monitor patients at home and support specialty con-
to communicate more effectively and increased access to sultation in rural and underserved areas. The NI research
information that supported nursing practice. The WWW agenda promoted the integration of nursing care data in
also became an integral part of the HIT systems and the HIT systems that would also generate data for analysis,
means for nurses to browse the Internet and search world- reuse, and aggregation.
wide resources (Nicoll, 1998; Saba, 1995). A historical analysis of the impact of the Nursing
Minimum Data Set (NMDS) demonstrated that contin-
2000s A change occurred in the new millennium as more ued consensus and effort was needed to bring to fruition
and more healthcare information became digitalized and the vision and implementation of minimum nursing data
newer technologies emerged. In 2004 an executive order into clinical practice (Hobbs, 2011). The NMDS continues
13335 established the ONC and issued a recommendation to be the underlining focus in the newer HIT systems. A
calling for all healthcare providers to adopt interoperable new NI research agenda for 2008–2018 (Bakken, Stone, &
EHRs by at least 2014 or 2015 (http://healthhit.gocv/topic/ Larson, 2012) emerged as critical for this specialty. The
about-onc). This challenged nurses to get involved in the new agenda is built on the agenda originally developed and
design of systems to support their workflow as well as in published by the National Institute for Nursing Research
the integration of information from multiple sources to (NINR) in 1993 (NINR, 1993). The authors focused on
support nurses’ knowledge of technology. In the late 2000s, the new NI research agenda on “3 aspects of context—
as hospitals became “paperless,” they began employing genomic health care, shifting research paradigms and
new nurses who had never charted on paper. social (Web2.0) technologies” (p. 280).
Technological developments that influenced health- A combination of the economic recession along with
care and nursing included data capture and data sharing the escalating cost of healthcare resulted in the American
technological tools. Wireless, point of care, regional data- Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 and
base projects, and increased IT solutions proliferated in the Health Information Technology for Economic and
healthcare environments, but predominately in hospitals Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 with funding to
and large healthcare systems. The use of bar coding and implement HIT and/or EHR systems, support health-
radiofrequency identification (RFID) emerged as a useful care information exchange, enhance community and
technology to match the “right patient with the right med- university-based informatics education, and support lead-
ication” to improve patient safety. A barcode medication ing edge research to improve the use of HIT (Gallagher,
2010). One of the first ONC initiatives was the Healthcare CMS began to focus reimbursement on a quality payment
Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) which program that addressed quality outcome measures (MIPS,
was designed to determine what coding systems were used 2019). It is anticipated that this initiative will also mini-
to process patient care data from admission to discharge. mize the payment burden on the clinicians by aggregating
It was found that the nursing care data was missing in the their patients’ health information from multiple providers
existing EHRs. Initially, in 2005–2007, the Clinical Care into a single electronic application.
Classification (CCC) System met the established stan- As of 2018, the CMS proposed policies to strengthen
dards as interoperable and was accepted and approved as Interoperability. The ONC and CMS rebranded MU to
the free, coded, nursing taxonomies that could be used for Promoting Interoperability. It is anticipated that the initia-
assessing and documenting nursing care to generate qual- tive will make use of new technologies and for patients to
ity outcomes (Saba & Whittenburg, 2015). This project aggregate their health information from multiple provid-
ended in 2009 when the HITECH Act of 2009 emerged. ers into a single electronic application. In 2019, the ONC
continued to implement the latest legislation as well as
2010s During 2010, the ONC convened two national Interoperability through summits, webinars, and public
committees, (a) National Committee on Health Policy and comment.
(b) National Committee on Health Standards, which out- Nurses have always been involved with all phases of
lined and designed to address the HITECH Act of 2009. MU as well as all other legislation, from the implemen-
The committees designed the “Meaningful Use” (MU) tation of systems to assuring usage and adaptation to the
program which was to be implemented in three stages of evolving health policy affecting the HIT and/or EHR sys-
legislation consisting of regulations which built onto each tems. Thus, the field of nursing informatics (NI) contin-
other with the ultimate goal of implementing a complete ues to grow due to the MU regulations which continue to
and interoperable EHR and/or HIT system in all U.S. hos- impact on every inpatient hospital in the country. To date,
pitals. For each stage, regulations were proposed by the the majority of hospitals in the country has established
national committees, developed and reviewed by the pub- HIT departments and has employed at least one nurse to
lic before they were finalized, and submitted to Centers for serve as a NI expert to assist with the implementation of
Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and the healthcare facili- MU requirements. As the MU requirements changed they
ties for implementation. also impacted on the role of the NI experts in hospitals
In 2011–2012, MU Stage 1 was initiated focusing pri- and ultimately on the roles of all nurses in the inpatient
marily on the CPOE initiative for physicians. Hospitals and outpatient facilities making NI an integral component
that implemented this MU regulation successfully received of all professional nursing services. An example of nurs-
federal funds for their HIT systems. In 2013–2015, MU ing involvement is the implementation of the CCC System
Stage 2 was introduced focusing primarily on the imple- nursing terminologies for documenting nursing practice
mentation of quality indicators that required electronic in the Hospital Corp of American (HCA) healthcare facili-
data to be collected as an integral component in the HIT ties (Saba & Whittenburg, 2015).
systems. The quality indicators would be used to guide
hospitals in patient safety and if not implemented used
as indicators subject to financial penalties. The proposed
Electronic Health Record Systems from a
MU Stage 3 that focused on care quality outcome mea-
Historical Perspective
sures was not implemented but replaced by the Medicare
Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of In 1989, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National
2015. The MACRA legislation created a new Medicare Academy of Sciences convened a committee and asked
Quality Payment Program that prioritized the value of the question, “Why is healthcare still predominantly
healthcare received by Medicare beneficiaries and revised using paper-based records when so many new computer-
Medicare’s reimbursement to eligible providers. The legis- based information technologies are emerging?” (Dick &
lation consolidated components of the Physician Quality Steen, 1991). The IOM invited representatives of major
Reporting System (PQRS), Value-Based Payment Modifier stakeholders in healthcare and asked them to define the
(VBM), and the Medicare Electronic Health Record problem, identify issues, and outline a path forward. Two
(EHR) Incentive program into the Merit-Based Incentive major conclusions resulted from the committee’s delib-
Payment System (MIPS). The purpose of the MIPS pro- erations. First, computerized patient record (CPR) is an
gram, initiated in 2017, was to establish Medicare pay- essential technology for healthcare and is an integral tool
ment to healthcare professional’s performance score for all professionals. Second, the committee after hear-
based on a value-based healthcare model. As a result, the ing from numerous stakeholders recognized that there
"No niin, varro vaan, kunnes saan hänet maalle kanssani", sanoi
Jem.
"Oma muijansakaan ei ole tunteva häntä, kun lasken hänet
kynsistäni."
"Vai se se kova olikin, jonka tunsin", sanoi Dobbs. "Ja minä kun
luulin sitä tuppipuukoksi."
"Hän on koko kirottu nulikka, totta totisesti, se hän on", sanoi Bill,
joka itsekin oli ihmetellyt kertomistaitoaan. "Ajatelkaas, hän nauroi
vaan, kun kerroin heittäneeni rintalapsen haikaloille."
"Mitä siellä teet poika?" kysyi laivuri, kun Ralph, jota merimiesten
jutut eivät enää huvittaneet, asteli kädet housuntaskuissa ympäri
peräkantta.
"Älä valehtele!" ärjäsi laivuri raivoissaan. "Et sinä sitä ole voinut
unohtaa."
"Ellet sinä nylje häntä, teen sen minä", kirkui Jem ja koetti ylettyä
nyrkillään kokkiin.
"Asiat ovat hullusti", sanoi nyt eräs vanha kalastaja. "Jonkun pitäisi
mennä ja hinata alus merelle."
Ei kukaan vastannut.
"Aivan varmaa."
"George!"
Ei kuulunut vastausta.
Ei vieläkään vastausta.
"Niin, kultaseni?"
"Niin, minä tiesin sen, ettet sinä tahtoisi minua mukaasi", sanoi
rouva Bunnett ja ruusut hänen hatussaan värisivät. "Perämies
ajattelee huvia hänen vaimolleen, mutta minä raukka saan istua
kotona, pestä ja paikata sinulle ja siivota huoneita. Ooh, minä kyllä
tiedän… ei sinun tarvitse sanoa mitään."
"On liian myöhäistä muuttaa sitä enää", sanoi laivuri. "Minun pitää
kannelle nyt; parasta kun seuraat mukana sinäkin."
"Minä ymmärrän."