The Influence of 1

Running head: THE MEDIA AND GAY IDENTITY

The Influence of Media Role Models on Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity

Sarah C. Gomillion, M.S.

Southwestern University

Traci A. Giuliano, Ph.D.

Southwestern University
 The Influence of 2

Abstract

The current investigation examined the influence of the media on gay, lesbian, and bisexual

(GLB) identity using both survey and in-depth interview approaches. In Study 1, 126 GLB

survey respondents (62 women, 53 men, and 11 unknown) in Texas indicated that the media

influenced their self-realization, coming out, and current identities by providing role models and

inspiration. In Study 2, 15 interviewees (6 and 9 men) revealed that media role models serve as

sources of pride, inspiration, and comfort. Our findings suggest that increasing the availability of

GLB role models in the media may positively influence GLB identity.
 The Influence of 3

The Influence of Media Role Models on Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity

Ever since Ellen DeGeneres made television history by coming out of the closet on her

popular primetime sitcom Ellen in 1998, gay and lesbian characters have become increasingly

prominent in the media (see Gross, 1994, and Hart, 2000, for discussions). In the years since

Ellen, television shows such as Will and Grace, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, and The L

Word, movies such as Brokeback Mountain and Angels in America (which was also an

influential play), and musical artists such as Melissa Etheridge, Rufus Wainwright, and The

Indigo Girls have emerged, appealing to a wide audience of both homosexuals and

heterosexuals. As the prominence of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) figures in the media has

risen, it seems likely that the media’s impact on the lives of GLB individuals has also grown. As

such, the purpose of the current investigation was to examine the influence of the media on GLB

identity. In Study 1, we sought to confirm the existence of the relationship between the media

and GLB identity by conducting a quantitative survey of GLB participants at a gay pride festival

in Texas. In Study 2, we sought to extend the findings from Study 1 by conducting qualitative in-

depth interviews with GLB individuals in an attempt to uncover the processes by which the

media interacts with GLB identity in a way that the survey format of Study 1 did not allow.

Empirical attention on the relationship between the media and GLB identity can be

justified by the role of contextual factors in GLB identity development (Hammack, 2005).

Indeed, the GLB identity development process, including the realization of one’s same-sex

sexual desires and coming out, has been conceptualized as a dynamic process that is mediated by

the cultural and historical context in which GLB individuals live (Hammack, 2005). Although

there appears to be a biological basis for same-sex attraction (for a review, see Rahman &

Wilson, 2003), each individual who experiences this attraction will likely develop a distinct
 The Influence of 4

sexual identity due in part to the influence of such cultural factors. For example, in interviews

with lesbian participants from varying age groups, Parks (1999) found that participants’ sexual

identity development, including the timing and the meanings ascribed to developmental events

such as coming out, was related to the social and cultural context in which participants

developed. Thus, contextual factors, including the effects of the media, should be considered

when studying GLB identity.

As Hammack’s (2005) framework of GLB identity development suggests, cultural factors

such as the media may influence important psychological domains, including individuals’ self-

perceptions. Ochman (1996), for example, found that exposing children to same-sex storybook

characters who were strong, positive role models enhanced children’s positive self-concepts.

This finding is significant in part because Ochman (1996) demonstrated that positive portrayals

of media characters who share similarities with an individual can produce changes in the

individual’s self-perception. Consistent with this notion, Wohlford, Lochman, and Barry (2004)

found that participants were more likely to have high self-esteem if they believed they shared

many character traits with their role models than if they believed they shared few traits with their

role models. In short, because having role models with similar characteristics predicts high self-

esteem, it seems reasonable to expect that GLB individuals who have access to GLB role models

may have higher self-esteem than GLB individuals who lack access to such role models. Having

role models has also been shown to be related to self-efficacy. For example, Cheung and Yue

(2003) found that modeling after accomplished and distinguished individuals is related to a

higher sense of self-efficacy among adolescents. It follows that GLB adolescents who model

after successful GLB media figures or personally-known GLB individuals may have a greater

sense of self-efficacy in terms of coming out and achieving a fully developed identity.
 The Influence of 5

As previously mentioned, Ochman (1996) also showed that the positive effects of role

models on children’s self-concepts were produced when the children in the study were exposed

to positive characters who were similar to themselves (i.e., they were the same gender as the

children). Indeed, the notion that a role model’s similarity to an individual is an important

predictor of the role model’s influence has been confirmed by a variety of studies demonstrating

that people are more influenced by role models of the same gender or race (Basow & Howe,

1980; Giuliano, Turner, Lundquist, & Knight, 2007; Karunanayake & Nauta, 2004; Lockwood,

2006). Taken together, these findings suggest that GLB individuals may be more influenced by

GLB media role models than by heterosexual media figures due to the GLB role models’ similar

identities.

Media role models can also influence individuals’ personality characteristics and values

through the process of identification. Feilitzen and Linne (1975) suggested two primary types of

identification: similarity identification and wishful identification. Similarity identification is

defined as finding similarities with or idealizing a media figure and living vicariously through his

or her activities. Wishful identification, on the other hand, occurs when an individual desires to

resemble a media figure due to the media figure’s appealing qualities (e.g., fame, attractiveness).

In an exploration of the role of the media in children and adolescents’ identity development,

Matthews (2003) found that preschoolers intensely identify with television and movie characters

and imitate them while playing. Similarly, school-aged children use television and movie

characters as role models for their social behavior and continue to imitate them while playing. In

high school, adolescents’ peers become more influential to their media-viewing choices and the

media becomes an important component of their social lives. Matthews (2003) also found that

the media provides positive role models for children and adolescents and can exert a beneficial
 The Influence of 6

influence on their social lives. However, the media can also exert a harmful influence on children

and adolescents by providing negative role models and by exposing children to traumatic

content. In general, Matthews (2003) concluded that media experiences contribute to individuals’

development of their sense of self and that these experiences remain salient into young adulthood

and possibly beyond. In a similar vein, Boon and Lomore (2001) found that among young adults

with strong attachments to celebrities, participants believed that their attitudes, values, and

personality characteristics have been influenced by their idols. Although neither Matthews

(2005) nor Boon and Lomore (2001) examined the influence of the media in relation to sexual

orientation, their findings suggest that the media could similarly contribute to the development of

GLB identity throughout the lifespan.

Unfortunately, there is little research specifically focusing on the influence of media

figures on GLB individuals’ identity. Theoretical work has pointed to the importance of media

figures in shaping GLB identity (see Clum, 2000; Dyer, 1987; and Gross, 2001). These scholars

argue that the concealable nature of sexual minorities’ identities and their historical exclusion

from mainstream culture has given many of them a heightened awareness of theatricality and

performativity, which in turn increases their affiliation with film and television stars. In addition,

the few exploratory empirical studies in this area provide intriguing qualitative evidence of the

media’s influence on GLB identity. In one such study, Kivel and Kleiber (2000) reported that

lesbian and gay youth use various media sources to learn about lesbian and gay identity and to

find individuals with whom they can relate. In these media sources, participants also found role

models who provided them with the inspiration to be successful and to overcome adversity. In a

somewhat different vein, Dobinson and Young (2000) found that lesbian film viewers identified

most with female characters who did not conform to traditional feminine roles and that they
 The Influence of 7

responded especially positively to actresses who were rumored to be lesbian and to films

featuring close friendships between women. In short, Dobinson and Young (2000) and Kivel and

Kleiber (2000) identified a number of ways in which GLB individuals interact with the media in

such a way that increases their comfort with their GLB identity. Although past research has

suggested possibilities for the manner in which the media may influence GLB individuals

(Basow & Howe, 1980; Boon & Lomore, 2001; Karunanayake & Nauta, 2004; Lockwood, 2006;

Matthews, 2005; Ochman, 1996; Wohlford et al., 2004) and has qualitatively examined the

influence of the media on GLB subgroups such as lesbians (Dobinson & Young, 2000) and GLB

youth (Kivel & Kleiber, 2000), there is a dearth of empirical research that has systematically

examined the influence of the media on GLB individuals’ identities. The purpose of the current

investigation was to address this gap by examining the relationship between the media and GLB

identity in depth, with a particular focus on the influence of media role models on GLB identity.

Study 1

The purpose of Study 1 was to confirm the relationship between the media and GLB

identity by surveying a sample of GLB participants about how the media relates to different

aspects of GLB life, including GLB identity and the coming out process. Specifically, the current

study examined which media figures and sources participants named as influential to their

realization that they were GLB, to their decision to come out, and to their comfort with their

GLB identities. The current study also examined how participants described the influence of

these media figures and sources on participants’ realization that they were GLB and on their

decision to come out. In addition, the current study also investigated participants’ opinions of

various aspects of the media, including the specific media figures that participants listed most

frequently as positive and negative portrayals of GLB individuals, whether participants listed
 The Influence of 8

more positive or negative portrayals of GLB media figures overall, and what participants would

like to see more of in the media in terms of its depictions of GLB characters. Finally, the current

study also examined whether participants rated various forms of media (e.g., the Internet,

movies, books) differently in terms of their influence on participants’ decision to come out.

Method

Participants

The sample consisted of 126 respondents (62 women, 53 men, and 11 unknown)

attending a gay pride festival in Austin, Texas, in 2005. The majority of participants were White

(69.5%), with the remainder of the sample identifying as Hispanic (16.4%), Asian-American

(4.7%), African-American (2.5%), multi-racial (.8%), or “other” (1.6%). The age of participants

ranged from 18 to 64 (M = 33; SD = 8.94). The majority of participants (89.1%) reported being

homosexual, 8.6% reported being bisexual, and 2.3% did not indicate their sexual orientation.

Measures

The one-page, double-sided questionnaire was intentionally kept brief in order to attract

as many participants as possible. The questionnaire assessed four primary areas of interest: self-

realization of GLB identity, the coming out process, current identity, and GLB media figures. An

initial section assessed demographic information, including age, race, gender, and sexual

orientation. Sexual orientation was measured on a 7-point scale modified from the Kinsey scale

(Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948) that ranged from 0 (Exclusively Other-Sex Attraction) to 6

(Exclusively Same-Sex Attraction).

Self-realization of GLB identity. Several items asked respondents to discuss their self-

realization that they were gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Self-realization refers to participants’ process

of becoming privately aware of their attraction to members of the same sex and becoming aware
 The Influence of 9

that they were GLB (see McCarn & Fassinger, 1996, and Roseborough, 2003, for discussions of

this process). Participants were also asked to report the age at which they first became aware of

their orientation and to indicate on a 3-point scale (No, Somewhat, and Yes) the extent to which

the media had influenced their realization that they were gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Next, in an

open-ended question, participants were asked to identify specific characters, shows, websites,

and other forms of media that were influential to their self-realization process. A final open-

ended question in this section asked participants to describe how these media forms influenced

their realization that they were gay, lesbian, or bisexual.

Coming out. In the next section, participants were asked about their coming out process,

which was defined as the process of divulging one’s gay, lesbian, or bisexual identity to others.

First, participants reported the extent to which they were out among their friends, family,

coworkers, and to the public ( = .74) on a 3-point scale (No, Somewhat, and Yes) and also

indicated the age at which they came out to each of these groups. Participants were then asked to

rate how influential different forms of media (i.e., television, magazines and newspapers,

movies, music and radio, books, and the Internet) were to their coming out process on a 5-point

scale ranging from 1 (Not at All Influential) to 5 (Very Influential). Following these items was an

open-ended question that asked participants to list specific forms of media that were influential

to their coming out process. Finally, participants were asked to describe how the different media

that they listed influenced their coming out process.

Current identity. Several items on the questionnaire assessed the ways in which the media

influenced participants’ current identity. First, they were asked to indicate the extent to which the

media increases their comfort with their GLB identity on a 3-point scale (Very Little, Somewhat,
 The Influence of 10

and Very Much). Next, participants were asked to list specific shows, characters, websites, and

other forms of media that increased their comfort with their identity.

GLB media figures. Subsequent items on the questionnaire assessed participants’

opinions about the media’s portrayal of GLB characters. First, they were asked to rate how

positively the media portrays gays, lesbians, and bisexuals on a 5-point scale ranging from 1

(Very Negatively) to 5 (Very Positively). The remaining three open-ended questions asked

participants to list positive and negative portrayals of GLB characters as well as to describe what

they would like to see more of in the media in terms of portrayals of GLB characters.

Procedure

Attendants at a gay pride festival in Austin, Texas, were approached by the researchers

and told that the purpose of the survey was to study the influence of the media on gay, lesbian,

and bisexual identity. If they agreed to complete the survey, they were shown the instructions,

and each section was briefly explained to them. After participants completed the survey and

placed it into a folder to protect their anonymity, they were thanked and offered a small pride-

related trinket (such as a bracelet or sticker) as a token of appreciation.

Coding of Open-Ended Responses

The data from the open-ended questions were coded in order to investigate most of the

research questions. Interrater reliability was established by having both the researcher and an

independent rater code participants’ responses. The average Cohen’s kappa across questions for

the two coders was .82. Discrepancies between coders were resolved through discussion and,

when discussion could not yield a consistent code, discrepancies were resolved by alternating

between coders’ assigned codes in a randomized fashion until complete agreement was reached.
 The Influence of 11

Results and Discussion

The open-ended questions were coded to examine the media sources and figures that

participants most frequently listed as influential to their self-realization, coming out process, and

comfort with their GLB identity and to examine participants’ descriptions of how the media

figures influenced these domains. Participants listed a variety of miscellaneous television

characters (number in subsample, n = 8) and Ellen DeGeneres (n = 5) as being influential to their

realization that they were gay, lesbian, or bisexual. When asked how the media sources and

characters that participants listed influenced their realization that they were GLB, the most

common response was that they identified with the characters (n = 6). For example, one

participant reported that “watching the main character deal with her sexuality and society’s

reaction, I really connected with her struggle.” Another common response was that the characters

served as role models (n = 5). One participant wrote that “positive role models were crucial to

letting me know I wasn’t alone.” Indeed, having such a sense of social support has been shown

to enhance individuals’ psychological and physical well being (Wills, 1990).

Ellen DeGeneres also appeared to be influential to participants’ decisions to come out to

others; she was most frequently mentioned (n = 11), as were books (n = 10), websites (n = 7),

and Will and Grace (n = 6). When participants described how the characters, shows, websites,

and other media influenced their coming out process, the most frequent response was that these

media forms inspired participants to feel pride in their identities (n = 11). In addition,

participants indicated that media figures served as role models (n = 7) and that mere exposure to

GLB characters and media sources was influential (n = 9). As an example, one participant wrote

that GLB media sources “[let] me know we were out there.”

 The Influence of 12

Participants listed several different shows and media figures as making them feel more

comfortable with their GLB identities, including The L Word (n = 26), Will and Grace (n = 20),

Queer as Folk (n = 18), and Ellen DeGeneres (n = 15). To determine whether participants’

preference for different shows was related to their gender, a Pearson Chi-Square test was

conducted. This test compares the observed frequency distribution of scores to a theoretical

frequency distribution to determine whether two variables are independent or related. The test

indicated that the shows participants listed were indeed related to participants’ gender.

Specifically, women (n = 19) were significantly more likely than men (n = 3) to list The L Word

as making them feel more comfortable with their identities, 2 (2, N = 115) = 10.98, p = .004. By

contrast, men (n = 15) were significantly more likely than women (n = 5) to list Will and Grace,

2 (2, N = 115) = 9.26, p < .05. However, men and women were equally likely to list Ellen and

Queer as Folk. This finding is not surprising considering that The L Word primarily featured

lesbian characters, whereas Will and Grace featured gay male characters. Indeed, our results

corroborate previous findings that people are more likely to be influenced by same-sex role

models (Basow & Howe, 1980; Giuliano et al., 2007; Lockwood, 2006; Ochman, 1996).

When asked to list positive depictions of GLB characters, Ellen (n = 25) was most

frequently mentioned by participants, as were The L Word (n = 19) and Will and Grace (n = 15).

Interestingly, Will and Grace (n =13) was also frequently cited for its negative depiction of GLB

characters, as was Queer as Folk (n = 8). Next, a t-test was conducted to determine whether

participants listed more positive or negative portrayals overall. The results revealed that

participants reported a greater number of positive depictions of GLB characters (M = .92) than

negative depictions (M = .55), t (122) = 3.95, p < .001. This finding could simply be a result of

participants’ favorite characters coming to mind more easily (i.e., the availability heuristic, see
 The Influence of 13

Tversky & Kahneman, 1973), or it could be indicate a shift from negative, stereotypical

portrayals of GLB characters in the media to a greater incidence of positive portrayals. Further

research is needed to examine the content of GLB-themed media to determine whether its

portrayal of GLB individuals has in fact become more positive in recent years. However, an

important caveat to these reports is that respondents’ perception of portrayals as “positive’ or

“negative” is subjective. In other words, individuals interpret media representations in multiple

ways – negative representations may not always be interpreted as negative, for instance (see

Dyer, 1993). Thus, these reports should be considered with this subjectivity in mind.

When asked what they would like to see more of in terms of media portrayals of GLB

characters, participants most frequently reported that they would like to see more realistic

portrayals of GLB individuals (n = 40). As one participant noted, he would like to see more

“normal people with normal jobs who just happen to be gay.” The content of “realistic”

portrayals most likely will differ across individuals, depending on their perspective. These

reports may be interpreted as calls for greater diversity in terms of ethnicity, income level,

occupation, age, etc. as well as less glamorized portrayals (as the above quote suggests).

Participants also reported that they would like to see more portrayals of GLB families in

particular (n = 15), and more positive portrayals in general (n = 13). Thus, despite the fact that

participants listed a greater number of positive portrayals of GLB individuals than negative

portrayals, participants clearly desired many changes in the representation of this group.

Finally, a 1 x 6 repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted to determine whether the

various forms of media differed in their degree of influence on participants’ coming out process.

Because the assumption of sphericity was violated for the test, Greenhouse-Geisser degrees of

freedom were used. The results confirmed that participants ranked the various forms of media
 The Influence of 14

(i.e., television, magazines, movies, music, books, and the Internet) differently, F (4.24, 466.46)

= 4.03, p = .003. A Tukey post hoc test ( = .05) revealed that the Internet and books were rated

as most influential, television and movies were rated as relatively less influential, and music and

magazines were rated as least influential overall. It is likely that the Internet’s diverse resources

for GLB individuals contribute to its high level of influence. Another possible reason why the

Internet is influential to GLB individuals was suggested by McKenna and Bargh (1998), who

found that GLB individuals who participated in online discussion groups had greater self-

acceptance of their identities, were more likely to have revealed this identity to their friends and

families as a result of their participation in these online groups, and felt less estranged from

society in general. The authors concluded that such online groups are important to individuals

with marginalized identities because these groups offer their members a sense of community and

belonging that is often unattainable in the real world. Further research is needed to determine

conclusively how the Internet differs from other media forms with respect to its relationship with

GLB individuals.

In sum, Study 1 was one of the first to systematically examine the influence of the media

on GLB identity. In addition, participants provided feedback about specific individuals and

characters who were influential to them, such as Ellen DeGeneres and Will from Will and Grace.

However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, although the gay pride festival

provided a unique opportunity to gather a large sample of GLB participants, its generally

positive atmosphere may have biased some of the responses to the survey questions (e.g.,

participants’ responses may have been more positive than they would have been in another

context). It cannot be determined from the results of this study alone whether this bias was

present or what its precise effects may have been, but the possibility of such a bias must be
 The Influence of 15

considered when interpreting the results. In addition, the busy atmosphere of the gay pride

festival and the survey format itself did not allow for participants to elaborate in great detail on

their responses or to explore avenues of thought about which the survey questions did not ask.

Thus, the processes by which the media relates to GLB identity could not be thoroughly

explored. However, Study 1 did suggest that the media exerts an important influence on GLB

individuals’ identities, and therefore a more in-depth investigation of this influence seemed

warranted.

Study 2

Consistent with the body of research indicating that role models positively influence

various aspects of identity in general (e.g., Cheung & Yue, 2003; Ochman, 1996; Wohlford et

al., 2004), Study 1 indicated that participants considered media role models to be influential to

their identities. Specifically, participants reported that media role models were influential to the

self-realization of their GLB identities and to their coming out process. Other research has also

indicated that role models may be important to various aspects of GLB identity. In one of the few

studies in this area, Bringaze and White (2001) surveyed lesbian leaders and role models about

the resources they used during their coming out process. Participants reported that support from

older gays and lesbians, including GLB role models, was especially helpful. Thus, Bringaze and

White (2001) concluded that role models are a helpful component of the coming out process for

well-adjusted lesbians, which presumably would also be true for well-adjusted gay men and

bisexual men and women. In another study in this area, Nauta, Saucier, and Woodard (2001)

found that GLB college students believed that it was important for their career role models to be

GLB and/or to support GLB individuals. Interestingly, GLB students also reported that they

received a low level of support and guidance from their career role models, indicating that their
 The Influence of 16

role models were not personally known by them and probably came from the media or other

external sources.

Although media role models can exert a positive influence over GLB individuals, such

role models have historically been somewhat scarce due to under-representation or to negative

representations of GLB individuals in the media (Gross, 1994; Gross, 2001; Hart, 2000; Russo,

1987). According to Fryberg and Townsend (2008), such under-representation, or invisibility,

can take two primary forms – absolute invisibility or relative invisibility. Absolute invisibility

refers to a total absence of representations of a particular group and is thought to limit the

possibilities for a group member’s identity by limiting the available schematic representations of

possible selves. By contrast, relative invisibility refers to an absence of rich, positive

representations of a particular group (i.e., although representations exist, they are stereotypical

and narrow). Relative invisibility also limits schematic representations of possible selves, as well

as causes negatively represented group members to question both their individual value and their

value within society.

Both types of invisibility are relevant to the current paper. Throughout much of the

twentieth century, homosexuality was primarily depicted implicitly, if at all (Gross, 2001; Russo,

1987). In fact, industry standards for both forms of media explicitly forbade depictions of

homosexual behavior. When implicitly gay characters appeared in the media, they typically were

depicted according to one of several archetypes. For gay men, the “sissy” was a common

archetype – an asexual, effeminate, and often ridiculous or ineffectual foil to a story’s hero

(Russo, 1987). Lesbian characters were rarely portrayed in the media during this era (Capsuto,

2000), but when they were, their portrayal typically adhered to the “predatory and lonely

lesbian” and/or “dyke” archetypes, both of which heavily emphasized the characters’ sinister,
 The Influence of 17

masculine qualities (Russo, 1987). These archetypes remained prevalent even when

homosexuality was referenced explicitly in the latter decades of the twentieth century. During

this time, depictions of GLB characters were typically as either victims or villains, both of whom

frequently had tragic outcomes, such as suicide, violent death, or isolation (Capusto, 2000;

Gross, 2001; Russo, 1987). Indeed, even acclaimed contemporary depictions of GLB characters,

such as Brokeback Mountain, still adhere to these conventions. Based on the history of GLB

representation in the media, it seems reasonable to expect that most GLB individuals have

personally experienced both absolute and relative invisibility in the media and therefore may

have experienced the negative effects of both types of invisibility. As the number of

representations of GLB individuals has increased, it seems likely that relative invisibility is

currently a more common experience for GLB individuals, whereas absolute invisibility may

have been more common in earlier decades, when depictions of GLB individuals in the media

were scarce.

Although invisibility may have harmful consequences for GLB individuals, both

Bringaze and White (2001) and Nauta et al. (2001) established that role models, including media

role models, may be important resources for GLB individuals. However, it is not yet known how

the media influences GLB identity specifically. As such, the purpose of Study 2 was to further

explore the influence of media role models on GLB identity. In order to study this relationship,

15 GLB men and women were interviewed about their coming-out process, their identities, and

the media. Generally speaking, Study 2 sought to uncover the primary ways in which the media

influences GLB identity. This study was intended to expand upon the findings of Study 1 in a

richer, more thorough manner by allowing participants to provide elaborate responses to the

interview questions and to generate their own avenues of thought.

 The Influence of 18

Method

Participants

Fifteen participants (six women and nine men) were interviewed for the second study in

2006 in Austin, Texas. The sample was 80% White and 20% Hispanic-American, and

participants ranged in age from 23 to 50 (M = 33.7, SD = 9.1). Although the majority (93.3%) of

participants classified themselves as homosexual, 6.7% of participants classified themselves as

bisexual. Participants were primarily recruited through personal contacts and through snowball

sampling, in which participants provided additional contacts who were recruited for the

interviews. Participation was voluntary, although respondents did receive a small monetary gift

as compensation for their time.

Measures

Participants were first asked to complete a one-page questionnaire, which included

demographic information, questions about participants’ media consumption, and questions about

participants’ involvement in the GLB community. The questions about participants’ community

involvement were part of a separate study and thus are not discussed further. To maintain their

confidentiality, participants generated a six-digit code number consisting of their mothers’ birth

month, their fathers’ birth month, and their own birth month (e.g., 10/07/05). Interviews were

labeled with this number in order to link them to participants’ surveys. Next, participants were

asked to indicate their age, gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation, which was measured using

the 7-point modified Kinsey scale (Kinsey et al., 1948) from Study 1.

The interviews ranged in length from 20 min to 1 hr 27 min (M = 32 min) and were

recorded with an Olympus WS-100 digital recorder. In the first portion of the interview,

participants were asked to discuss their coming out process and the forms of media that were
 The Influence of 19

important to them during this time. Next, participants were asked more specific questions about

the media’s relationship to their identity (e.g., “In terms of media figures, who do you think has

influenced your life the most positively?”). The final portion of the interview consisted of more

general questions about the representation of GLB individuals in the media (e.g., “Tell me about

how the influence of the media has changed over time for you personally.”). Finally, participants

were asked if they would like to elaborate further on the topic (see Appendix for the full

interview guide).

Procedure

Participants were interviewed in a private, quiet location of their choosing. Prior to the

beginning of the interview, they were asked to sign a consent form explaining the purpose of the

study and their rights, which included the rights to leave the study at any time as well as to

decline to answer any questions during the interview. They were told that the purpose of the

study was to examine GLB individuals’ experiences with the media in terms of coming out, the

GLB community, and their identity. After giving their consent, participants completed the

supplemental questionnaire and generated their code numbers. After participants indicated that

they were ready to begin, the interviewer began recording and interviewing participants. For the

most part, the interviewer adhered to the interview guide. However, when appropriate, the

interviewer deviated from the guide in order to facilitate more elaboration on the part of

participants or to explore avenues of thought generated by participants. After participants had

answered all of the interview questions and indicated that they had no further comments to add,

the recorder was turned off and the interview was completed.
 The Influence of 20

Data Analysis and Coding

The data generated from the interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis

(see Braun & Clarke, 2006), in which the interview transcripts were marked with notes about the

themes that appeared in response to the interview questions. After making notes on the

transcripts, the researcher analyzed the responses to several questions from the interview guide

that appeared to capture the general overall themes of the interviews. Next, the researcher wrote

memos about the responses to each question in which she categorized the responses into themes,

interpreted the themes, and provided illustrative quotes for each theme. After analyzing the

memos as a whole, the researcher developed an explanation of the pattern of results, and

continued to refine the thematic map as themes were identified.

To establish interrater reliability, a second independent coder assigned codes to the set of

responses. Agreement between coders was high, with a Cohen’s kappa of .90. Discrepancies

were resolved through discussion, and when agreement could not be reached, discrepancies were

resolved by alternating between raters’ assigned codes in a randomized fashion until complete

agreement was reached.

Results and Discussion

A prominent theme that emerged from respondents’ interviews was the importance of

media role models to their identities. For some participants, their most important role models

were GLB individuals in the media, whereas others named non-GLB media figures who were

outsiders or who were strong, admirable individuals. Moreover, respondents discussed the

influence of these role models on their identity, which included being an inspiration and/or

fostering a sense of pride, being a source of comfort, and making respondents feel more

positively about their GLB identities. In contrast to these positive effects, participants also
 The Influence of 21

discussed the negative impact of the limited and stereotypical representation of GLB individuals

in the media, which they reported made them feel excluded from society and limited their

identity expression.

Positive Identity Influences

Inspiring pride. Many respondents (n = 8) described their role models in terms of their

positive characteristics. For example, Dave1 (40, Hispanic-American, gay) described his

admiration of openly gay former Texas State Representative Glen Maxey in terms of “the fire in

his eyes and the passion in his eyes” and Alejandro (23, Latino, gay) recalled Univision news

anchor Jorge Ramos as “very attractive, very successful, spoke very fluently and very

eloquently.” In turn, the positive characteristics of their role models affected participants in

different ways. Alejandro and other participants specifically remembered wanting to emulate

their role models. For example, when describing her childhood role model, Superman, Steph (29,

White, lesbian) explained that “I thought I had a huge crush on him, but it turns out I wanted to

be him, so yeah, that was pretty influential because for awhile there I thought I could fly.” Other

respondents also emphasized how their role models served as sources of strength, particularly in

regard to their GLB identity. For example, Megan (23, White, lesbian), as well as other

respondents, cited Ellen DeGeneres as a positive influence on her life and said, “I got some

strength from seeing what she was able to do.” Thus, we see evidence of two types of

identification with media role models in participants’ responses. Steph’s response appears more

consistent with wishful identification, whereas Megan’s appears more consistent with similarity

identification, suggesting that both types may be influential to GLB identity (Feilitzen & Linne,

1975). However, future research is needed to clarify how these two types of identification

operate among GLB individuals. As a whole, these findings indicate that positive media role
1
Participants’ names have been changed to protect their confidentiality.
 The Influence of 22

models influenced many respondents’ identities by being admirable figures who some

participants emulated and who provided strength for other participants.

These findings are also consistent with those of Lockwood and Kunda (1997), who

demonstrated that inspiration is an important function of role models when individuals perceive

themselves to be similar to their role models. Indeed, participants in the current study typically

named GLB media figures as their role models, and if they did not name GLB role models, they

often named role models with whom they otherwise identified, suggesting that GLB individuals

may be inspired by role models who they perceive to be similar to themselves. Many participants

also discussed specifically trying to emulate their role models, particularly as children and

adolescents. This finding is consistent with research demonstrating that children, adolescents,

and young adults often emulate their favorite media figures as well as adopt the media figures’

values and personality characteristics (Boon & Lomore, 2001; Matthews, 2003).

Taking comfort. In addition to discussing how their role models functioned as general

sources of pride and inspiration, respondents also discussed how these role models influenced

their identity development and coming out process specifically. One way in which respondents’

role models and other GLB media figures affected these processes was by serving as sources of

comfort for respondents (n = 5). Interestingly, GLB media figures had this effect even when the

GLB characters were not portrayed in a positive light. For example, the first memory of any gay

presence in the media for Brian (31, White, gay) was his exposure to anti-gay religious tracts.

However, he said that “even though it was like really negative – it was a really negative little

pamphlet – it was comforting.” Indeed, it appears that for some participants, any GLB presence

in the media was comforting. In the words of Mary (51, White, lesbian):
 The Influence of 23

While you’re thrashing around trying to figure out who you are, that’s the only real

access you’ve got to what it means to be gay. You read anything you can get your paws

on, you watch whatever gay movies are out there. I guess it’s a good way of trying to

figure out what the heck it means to be different, and what does it look like? And it's nice

to know you're not the only one in the universe.

In short, GLB media figures shaped Mary’s identity by providing examples of what GLB people

look and act like, and such examples were a source of comfort to her while she was developing

her lesbian identity. These comments are also consistent with the notion that the way individuals

experience the media is largely a matter of interpretation, and thus even negative portrayals of

one’s group can be experienced positively (Dyer, 1993).

Other respondents also discussed the comfort they took in positive GLB role models. For

example, both Michelle (28, White, bisexual) and Carol (43, White, lesbian) remembered Ellen

DeGeneres’ well-publicized coming out as a source of comfort to them during their own coming

out process. As Michelle put it, “it really made me feel like it was okay to be gay and that it was

okay for me to be whoever I wanted to be.” Thus, Michelle felt validated by Ellen’s coming out.

In a similar vein, Carol said that:

When I started finding out that [Ellen] was a lesbian and she was going to be coming out

on her show, I mean all these feelings erupted inside. I mean I was just kind of – this is a

woman who is very accepted on television and in the world and she’s going to take this

step, and I felt like I was going to have to do that at one point or another...That definitely

paved the way for me.

Because of Ellen, Carol felt that eventually she would also have to come out, and she used Ellen

as a source of guidance during this time.

 The Influence of 24

Although GLB media figures served an important function as role models for many of the

participants, other participants were not exposed to GLB individuals in the media due to the

scarcity of GLB representation. As a result, these participants sought role models with whom

they could identify in other ways and used these role models as sources of comfort. For example,

participants reported identifying with media figures who were outsiders and who, like them,

differed from existing norms. Brian discussed the importance of comic book characters to his

identity as a child:

The whole character arc in the X-Men – and it has become even more so – was that they

were mutants and they were apart from everyone else. And that was somehow comforting

in this whole struggle when I felt different from everybody else. It was comforting during

those ages…It’s – because there weren’t many – I mean there really wasn’t when I was

growing up – and I grew up in a really small town – well, at least at that point, I was in a

small town. And there really wasn’t anything, you know, I think that I could recognize

myself in. And I think mutant maybe was as close as I could get.

Although the characters in the X-Men series were not openly GLB, Brian identified with them

due to the parallels between their experience as outcasts from society and his experience as a gay

person who was not accepted by society. These similarities comforted Brian and made him feel

more accepted despite being different from his peers. Brian’s interpretation of the “straight”

characters in the X-Men series seems to belong to the tradition of “queer” or outsider readings of

texts that many marginalized groups have adopted (see Farmer, 2000; Sinfield, 1994). Because

the majority of media representations are of mainstream demographic groups, marginalized

groups often interpret these representations in an “against the grain” fashion, such as reading

heterosexual texts as if they were intended for a homosexual audience (Gross, 2001). It appears
 The Influence of 25

that in Brian’s case, appropriating a straight text in such a manner allowed him to affirm his own

identity and find comfort.

The use of media figures as a source of comfort is also consistent with previous research

demonstrating that individuals with low self-esteem, low levels of security and closeness, and

low levels of family satisfaction tend to affiliate with celebrities to a greater extent (Cheng, 1997;

Duck, 1990; Giles & Maltby, 2004). Given GLB individuals’ marginalized status, such

individuals may be more likely to have stronger attachments to celebrities, just as individuals

with low self-esteem are more likely to have stronger attachments to celebrities (Cheng, 1997).

The possibility that GLB individuals may develop stronger attachments to media figures due to

their marginalized status in society should be explored in future research.

Viewing GLB identity more positively. Beyond making participants feel comforted, GLB

role models in the media made participants feel as though it was acceptable to be GLB and

helped participants view their identity more positively (n = 4). In essence, seeing GLB

individuals in the media normalized these participants’ own GLB identities and made them feel

more socially acceptable. For example, Megan said that the media influenced her coming out

process in the following way:

I didn’t feel like I was weird or abnormal. I felt like I had enough positive, I guess, role

models in the media that I didn’t, you know, I didn’t feel like it wasn’t something I could

express or that it was a negative thing.

The presence of positive GLB role models in the media normalized Megan’s lesbian identity and

helped her view her identity positively rather than negatively.

In a broader sense, seeing others’ acceptance of GLB individuals in the media made

participants feel like others’ reception of them would be more tolerant than hostile. For example,
 The Influence of 26

Ted (24, White, gay) discussed how Will and Grace made him feel that his gay identity was

more socially acceptable.

I had never really been around gay people then, and so seeing like straight people all over

thinking that show was funny was really helpful in terms of like that they weren’t freaked

out by it. So I was like, oh well, if they can deal with a sitcom where people are

unapologetically gay, then that’s a good sign and that calms me a little.

To summarize, Ted used others’ reactions to Will and Grace as a gauge of how they would react

to his own sexuality. The popularity and acceptance of the show made him feel less threatened

by the possibility of hostility toward him on the basis of his homosexuality.

These effects on participants’ positive self-views may be analogous to the effects of role

models on individuals’ self-concepts found in other research (Cheung & Yue, 2003; Ochman,

1996, Wohlford et al., 2004) and as such provide support for the possibility that exposure to

positive GLB role models may enhance the self-views of GLB individuals. This contention is

supported by the fact that participants in the current study reported that their GLB role models

inspired pride in their identities and enabled them to view their identities more positively.

Negative Effects of the Lack of Role Models

Although respondents discussed several benefits of having role models in the media, the

availability of GLB role models in the media has historically been very limited (see Gross, 1994;

Gross, 2001; Hart, 2000; and Russo, 1987). Therefore, it is not surprising that respondents also

discussed how the absence of identifiable figures in the media affected them (n = 4). The

prevailing sentiment in these discussions was a sense of being excluded from traditional society.

For example, both Rick (38, White, gay) and Megan recalled seeing depictions of traditional

families in the media that did not include GLB individuals. Rick said, “I remember being really
 The Influence of 27

struck by that as like, I’m not included in that,” and Megan said that “I can see that it kind of was

challenging my life versus what traditional life was, you know, there was a difference from early

on.” Media depictions such as these made both Rick and Megan feel excluded from traditional

families on the basis of their GLB identities. These feelings not uncommon for GLB individuals,

who often create kinship networks of friends, lovers, children, and other family members as a

result of their legal and social exclusion from so-called traditional families (see Weeks, Heaphy,

& Donovan, 2001, and Weston, 1991).

Participants also discussed the damaging effects of the general absence of GLB

individuals in the media. For example, Rick discussed the lack of GLB themes in popular music:

I mean, like, how many songs do I hear on the radio that are love songs that pair a guy

and a guy or a woman and a woman, for that matter? It’s just, like, it’s the absence that is

so – that can be so damaging, I think.

Michelle revealed similar feelings in her ambivalence concerning women’s magazines:

The women’s magazines are really frustrating because I don’t see myself in them at all,

and I love magazines. Like I’m such a fiend about like fashion and women’s magazines,

but you don’t see any discussion of lesbians in there.

In essence, both Rick and Michelle felt excluded from their favorite forms of media due to their

sexual identities, which adversely affected them.

Not surprisingly, just as the absence of GLB figures in the media had adverse

consequences for many respondents, so did the negative portrayals of GLB individuals in the

media. For example, Brian discussed feeling limited in the expression of his gay identity as a

result of the stereotypical portrayals of gay men in the media.

 The Influence of 28

1Just everything was so, so negative. And it gets you sort of warped when you're

young -- about what the gay lifestyle is, about promiscuity and drugs and maybe the

flamboyantness, rather than possibility. It really seemed to limit the possibility with --

you know, being gay -- how my life could be.

Thus, the media’s negative depiction of gay lifestyles made Brian feel at the time that he was not

able to deviate from these stereotypes in terms of his personal expression of his identity. As the

above findings make clear, both absolute and relative invisibility (Fryberg & Townsend, 2008)

can exert harmful psychological effects on GLB individuals, including making them feel less

valuable as members of society and limiting their identity expression. Due to the more pervasive

absence of GLB representation in the media in past decades (Gross, 1994; Gross, 2001; Hart,

2000; Russo, 1987), older GLB individuals may have been more affected by absolute invisibility,

whereas younger GLB individuals, who may have been exposed to more representations of GLB

individuals in the media, may be more influenced by relative invisibility. However, future

research is needed to explore the effects of both types of invisibility on GLB individuals.

The negative influence of the media on participants’ identities appears to have been

related to the lack of GLB role models in the media. As a whole, the results from Study 2

strongly suggest that role models are important to the identities of GLB individuals. In particular,

our findings indicate that media role models foster pride in GLB individuals’ identities, provide a

source of comfort, and help them view their identities more positively. On the other hand, the

media also appears to negatively affect GLB individuals by causing them to feel excluded from

society and to feel limited in their expressions of their GLB identities.

 The Influence of 29

General Discussion

One of the most significant contributions of the current research is its original exploration

of the influence of media role models on GLB identity using both a quantitative format and a

richer, qualitative approach. Importantly, the participants in these studies provided valuable

insights that have not appeared elsewhere in the empirical literature. The significance and

validity of the findings are supported by the fact that role models were discussed by almost all of

the participants in Study 2, regardless of their age, gender, or background.

Although the exploratory nature of Studies 1 and 2 revealed valuable findings about this

relatively unexplored topic, the nature of the studies also contributes to their limitations. In

particular, an important limitation of the present research is that causality cannot be inferred

from the findings. Therefore, it cannot be definitively concluded from our findings that positive

role models influence GLB identity. In other words, it is possible that GLB individuals with

positive, fully-developed identities may be more likely to seek out role models in the media.

Nonetheless, other research has experimentally established that role models do exert a positive

influence on individuals (see Ochman, 1996), which lends credence to our argument that media

role models foster positive identity in GLB participants. Future research on this topic should

attempt to substantiate the findings of the present study with experimental evidence. For

instance, experimental studies could expose GLB individuals to media depicting either GLB or

heterosexual role models and subsequently evaluate changes in participants’ self-concepts after

exposure to both types of role models to determine more conclusively whether positive GLB role

models enhance GLB individuals’ sense of self-worth.

Another limitation of the current research is that the two samples of participants may not

be representative of the GLB population as a whole. Specifically, the samples may have been
 The Influence of 30

less diverse than the general GLB population in terms of participants’ ethnicity and participants’

level of comfort with their identities or knowledge about the representation of GLB individuals

in the media. In addition, both studies were conducted in Austin, Texas, a relatively GLB-

friendly city. GLB individuals from other cities and countries may have had different

experiences with the media. Thus, future research on the topic of GLB identity and the media

will need to utilize more representative samples in order to ascertain the influence of role models

on the identities of other GLB populations.

Although these limitations present difficulties in terms of generalizing and generating

causal explanations of the findings, they do not undermine the contribution of the present study

to the understanding of the media’s influence on GLB identity. Indeed, several implications

emerged from the findings of the two studies. First, there clearly exists a relationship between

the media and GLB identity, making it imperative that GLB media sources consider the

messages they convey to their audience. For example, many participants in both studies

complained about stereotypical characters and negative portrayals, even in shows specifically

targeted toward a GLB audience, such as Queer as Folk. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that

decreasing stereotypical portrayals of GLB characters in the media would benefit GLB

individuals by potentially expanding the possibilities for GLB identity beyond the “sissy” and

“dyke” archetypes that the media so frequently offers (Russo, 1987).

Our findings also indicate that role models such as Ellen DeGeneres are crucial

influences on GLB identity. Indeed, both studies suggested that Ellen DeGeneres has been one of

the most influential lesbian role models in the media. This information presents a contrast to

some criticisms that Ellen DeGeneres’s coming out was not sufficiently political and did little to

subvert traditional norms for representing GLB characters in the media (see Dow, 2001, and
 The Influence of 31

Hubert, 1999, for discussions). In fact, Ellen was spontaneously mentioned by many participants

in both studies, clearly designating her as an influential figure in the GLB community. One

participant in Study 1 described her as “a role model and good example but also [a] creative

human being,” and another participant said that she “gave the strength to say I am gay and it’s

ok.” Perhaps one of the reasons Ellen was so influential is because her show was one of the first

to openly explore the issues and difficulties surrounding coming out (Ryan & Boxer, 1998). In

addition, she and her popular television character both came out simultaneously, increasing GLB

visibility both on television and in the media at large (see Gross, 2001, and Tracy, 2000).

Although her decision was primarily personal, it became a highly influential political moment in

Western culture. As Ryan and Boxer (1998) noted, her show inspired many GLB individuals to

seek therapy for their coming out difficulties, and many others followed Ellen’s example and

came out to their friends and family.

The apparent importance of GLB role models such as Ellen suggests that the availability

of positive GLB role models in the media should increase in order to better meet the needs of

GLB individuals. Consistent with this notion, Bringaze and White’s (2001) findings that

successful lesbian leaders believed that positive role models aided them in their coming out

process implies that having positive role models may enhance GLB individuals’ potential to

achieve a fully-realized identity and to become leaders in their community. As the present

research suggests, featuring positive depictions of GLB individuals in the media may enhance

GLB individuals’ sense of self-worth and may ultimately inspire them to become successful

leaders.

Another potential benefit of increasing positive role models in the media is that it may

also alleviate some of the psychological difficulties that many GLB individuals experience, such
 The Influence of 32

as low self-esteem (Frable, Wortman, & Joseph, 1997). Given the substantial amount of evidence

suggesting that positive role models enhance individuals’ self-esteem (Cheung & Yue, 2003;

Ochman, 1996; Wohlford et al., 2004), it seems plausible that increasing the representation of

positive GLB media figures may also increase GLB individuals’ self-esteem. However, the

media is clearly not the sole cause of the psychological difficulties of GLB individuals. As

Frable et al. (1997) demonstrated, gay men with a high degree of stigmatization from their

families tend to have low self-esteem, which is likely to also be true for lesbian and bisexual

individuals. Thus, societal prejudice against GLB individuals needs to also be substantially

decreased in order to allow GLB individuals a greater opportunity to achieve healthy

functioning. Based on findings that exposure to negative portrayals of GLB individuals can cause

heterosexuals to espouse relatively lasting negative attitudes toward this group whereas exposure

to positive portrayals of GLB individuals can cause heterosexuals to espouse more positive

attitudes toward this group (Levina, Waldo, & Fitzgerald, 2000; Schiappa, Gregg, & Hewes,

2005), it could be argued that increasing the positive representation of GLB media figures may

be an important first step toward reducing societal prejudice against the GLB community.

In closing, the studies presented here were some of the first to use both quantitative and

qualitative approaches to explore the relationship between the media and GLB identity. Study 1

revealed some of the different ways in which GLB men and women utilize the media to shape

their identities, particularly during important processes such as realizing their GLB identity and

coming out to others. Study 1 also investigated GLB individuals’ criticisms and desires

concerning the media’s representation of the GLB population, as well as the positive aspects of

the media, including its ability to supply GLB role models. Using a qualitative approach, Study 2

explored the findings from Study 1 in more depth and illuminated some of the ways in which
 The Influence of 33

media role models influence the realization, development, and expression of GLB identity. As

previously discussed, both studies provide guidance for the media in terms of changing its

portrayal of the GLB population to be more representative and less stereotyped and damaging.

These changes may lead the media further away from the “sissy” and “dyke” archetypes toward

new archetypes resembling positive role models such as Ellen DeGeneres and may be an

important step in reducing societal prejudice and discrimination toward this group of people.
 The Influence of 34

References

Basow, S. A., & Howe, K. G. (1980). Role-model influence: Effects of sex and sex-role attitude

in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 558-572.

Boon, S. D., & Lomore, C. D. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults:

Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity. Human Communication

Research, 27, 432-465.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in

Psychology, 3, 77-101.

Bringaze, T. B., & White, L. J. (2001). Living out proud: Factors contributing to healthy identity

development in lesbian leaders. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23, 162-173.

Capsuto, S. (2000). Alternate Channels: The Uncensored Story of Gay and Lesbian Images on

Radio and Television. New York: Balantine Books.

Cheng, S. T. (1997). Psychological determinants of idolatry in adolescents. Adolescence, 32,

687-692.

Cheung, C., & Yue, X. D. (2003). Adolescent modeling after luminary and star idols and

development of self-efficacy. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 11, 251-

267.

Clum, J. M. (2000). Still Acting Gay (Rev. ed.), New York: St Martin’s Griffin.Dobinson, C., &

Young, K. (2000). Popular cinema and lesbian interpretive strategies. Journal of

Homosexuality, 4(2), 97-122.

Dow, B. J. (2001). Ellen, television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies

in Media Communication, 18, 123-140.

 The Influence of 35

Duck, J. M. (1990). Children's ideals: The role of real-life versus media figures. Australian

Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 19-29.

Dyer, R. (1986). Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. London: British Film Institute.

Dyer, R. (2000). The Matter of Images (2nd rep.). London: Routledge.Farmer, B. (2000).

Spectacular Passions: Cinema, Fantasy, Gay Male Spectatorships. Durham: Duke

University Press.

Feilitzen, C., & Linne, O. (1975). Identifying with television characters. Journal of

Communication, 25, 51-55.

Frable, D. E. S., Wortman, C., & Joseph, J. (1997). Predicting self-esteem, well-being, and

distress in a cohort of gay men: The importance of cultural stigma, personal visibility,

community networks, and positive identity. Journal of Personality, 65, 599-624.

Fryberg, S. A., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2008). The psychology of invisibility. In G. Adams, M.

Biernat, N. R. Branscombe, C. S. Crandall, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.) Commemorating

Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination (pp. 173-193). Washington,

DC: American Psychological Association.

Giles, D. C., & Maltby, J. (2004). The role of media figures in adolescent development:

Relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities. Personality and

Individual Differences, 36, 813-822.

Giuliano, T. A., Turner, K. L., Lundquist, J. C., & Knight, J. L. (2007). Gender and the selection

of public athletic role models. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30, 161-198.

Gross, L. (2001). Up From Visibility: Lesbians, Gay Men, and The Media in America. New

York: Columbia University Press.

 The Influence of 36

Gross, L. (1994). What is wrong with this picture? Lesbian women and gay men on television. In

R. J. Ringer (Ed.), Queer words, queer images: Communication and the construction of

homosexuality (pp. 143-156). New York: New York University Press

Hammack, P. L. (2005). The life course development of human sexual orientation: An

integrative paradigm. Human Development, 48, 267-290.

Hart, K. R. (2000). Representing gay men on American television. Journal of Men's Studies, 9,

59-79.

Hubert, S. J. (1999) What's wrong with this picture? The politics of Ellen's coming out party.

Journal of Popular Culture 33, 31-36.

Karunanayake, D., & Nauta, M. M. (2004). The relationship between race and students'

identified career role models and perceived role model influence. Career Development

Quarterly, 52, 225-234.

Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., & Martin, C. (1948). Sexual behaviour in the human male.

Philadelphia: Saunders.

Kivel, B. D., & Kleiber, D. A. (2000). Leisure in the identity formation of lesbian/gay youth:

Personal, but not social. Leisure Sciences, 22, 215-232.

Levina, M., Waldo, C. R., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2000). We're here, we're queer, we're on TV: The

effects of visual media on heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal

of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 738-758.

Lockwood, P. (2006). “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-

gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 36-46.

Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on

the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.

 The Influence of 37

Matthews, D. (2003). Media memories: The first cable/VCR generation recalls their childhood

and adolescent media viewing. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 219-241.

McCarn, S. R., & Fassinger, R. E. (1996). Revisioning sexual minority identity formation: A

new model of lesbian identity and its implication for counseling and research. The

Counseling Psychologist, 24, 508-534.

McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity

‘‘demarginalization’’ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and

Social Psychology, 75, 681–694.

Nauta, M. M., Saucier, A. M., & Woodard, L. E. (2001). Interpersonal influences on students'

academic and career decisions: The impact of sexual orientation. Career Development

Quarterly, 49, 352-362.

Ochman, J. M. (1996). The effects of nongender-role stereotyped, same-sex role models in

storybooks on the self-esteem of children in grade three. Sex Roles, 35, 711-736.

Parks, C. A. (1999). Lesbian identity development: An examination of differences across

generations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 347-361.

Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual

orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1337-1382.

Roseborough, D. (2003). Conceptions of gay male life-span development: Past and present.

Journal of Human Behavior and the Social Environment, 8(2-3), 29-53.

Russo, V. (1987). The Celluloid Closet (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Ryan, C. C., &

Boxer, A. M. (1998). Coming out in primetime: The mental health impact of Ellen’s

“debut.” Cultural Diversity and Mental Health, 4(2), 135-142.

 The Influence of 38

Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis.

Communication Monographs, 72, 92-115.

Sinfield, A. (1994). Cultural Politics: Queer Reading. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania

Press.

Tracy, K. (1999). The Real Story of Ellen. Toronto: Birch Lane Press.

Tversky A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and

probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.

Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (Eds.). (2001). Same Sex Intimacies, Families of Choice

and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.

Weston, K. (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia

University Press.

Wills, T. A. (Ed.) (1990). Social support in social and clinical psychology. Journal of Social and

Clinical Psychology, 9.

Wohlford, K. E., Lochman, J. E., & Barry, T. D. (2004). The relation between chosen role

models and the self-esteem of men and women. Sex Roles, 50, 575-582.
 The Influence of 39

Appendix

Interview Guide

First, I’m going to ask some questions about your identity in general.
GLB Identity
 Tell me about your coming-out story. Probe about self-realization process if not mentioned.
 What role did the media – and by media I mean TV, movies, the Internet, books,
magazines, etc. - play in your coming out process? Were there other forms of media that
were important to you at this time?
Alright, now I’m going to switch gears a bit and ask some more specific questions about the media in
relation to your identity.
The Media and Identity
 In terms of your exposure to the media, was there a specific portrayal, story, image, etc.
that you remember being particularly influential to your identity while you were growing
up? Tell me about it. Could be GLB or not
 Do you prefer mainstream or alternative media sources? Tell me about some of your
favorite media sources. If they talk about media sources growing up: What about your favorite
media sources now?
 In terms of media figures, who do you think has influenced your life the most positively?
Negatively? Why (if not explained)?
 Overall, do you think the media has had a positive or negative effect on your life?
Now I want to talk about your relationship with the GLB community.
The Media and the GLB Community
 Do you participate in the GLB community? How do you participate? How often?
 Has the media played a role your participation in the GLB community? How so?
 Tell about the relationship between the media and the GLB community? Do you think
the GLB community regards the media as a positive or negative influence on the
community? Why? Do you feel the same way?
 How do you think “mainstream” culture perceives portrayals of GLB individuals in the
media?
 Tell me about a memorable time that you talked about a GLB media figure with others.
What happened? How did you react?
I’m going to switch gears again and ask some more general questions about the media.
Opinions on the portrayal of GLB individuals in the media
 What would you like to see more of in the media in terms of GLB portrayals?
 Now I’m going to ask about how you think the media portrays specific GLB subgroups:
Tell me about how you think the media portrays gay men. Lesbians? Bisexual men and
women? Older vs. younger gay men and lesbians? Which group is portrayed most
positively? Negatively? Are there any other differences that you’ve noticed in the
portrayals of these groups?
 What differences have you noticed in the way that different media sources, like TV,
movies, the Internet, the news, portray gays and lesbians?
 Tell me about some differences you have noticed in portrayals of gays and lesbians in the
media over time. How were gays and lesbians portrayed differently when you were
younger?
 The Influence of 40

 How do you think the current generation of GLB teenagers will be affected by the media?
Do you think this influence will change in the future?
 I know we’ve talked about this before, but I want to ask again to make sure I’ve heard
everything you have to say. Tell me about how the influence of the media has changed
over time for you personally.
 Is there anything else about this topic that you want to add?
 The Influence of 41

Author Note

Sarah C. Gomillion, Department of Psychology, Southwestern University; Traci A.

Giuliano, Department of Psychology, Southwestern University.

Sarah C. Gomillion is now at Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State

University of New York.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Sandi Nenga, Dr. Jacqueline Muir-Broaddus, Abigail

Riggs, Ryan Giuliano, Jason Dolloff, and Travis Norton for their contributions to the paper.

Please address correspondence to Sarah C. Gomillion, M.S., Department of Psychology,

University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110 email: sarahgom@buffalo.edu or to

Traci A. Giuliano, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Southwestern University, 1001 E.

University Avenue, Georgetown, TX 78626; email: giuliant@southwestern.edu .