Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

I have been working in the industry for more than a decade now

and I wish to share some things with the reader that I have
observed.

Material failure theories are an important part of the knowledge of


a mechanical Design and analysis engineer and is a frequently
discussed topic in interviews. The basic concept of stress is well
known (I will assume the reader already knows it). We material
failure occurs when stress exceeds the critical value. Why then is it
necessary to know the failure theories? It is because there are many
different types of “stresses” and you should know when to use
which one. They come under the category of failure criteria. Now let
us see how it works with examples.

Example1

Figure 1

Consider a rod being pulled by a tensile force and a normal stress of


200 MPa is induced. The yield strength of the material is 150 MPa
and the ultimate strength is 280 MPa. Will the rod fail? Since the
induced stress is greater than yield, the rod will yield but since the
induced stress is less than the ultimate strength, it will not rupture.
This one was a sitter. In this case, normal stress, principal stress and
von Mises stress are the equal . This stress state occurs in the
mechanical tensile specimen material test.
Example 2

Figure 2

Consider the system shown in fig.2: a brittle block of ultimate


strength 250 MPa being compressed by pressure of 200 MPa on
two of faces sides. Let us assume the block is thick enough in the
plane perpendicular to the screen to avoid buckling and also that
the contact between the walls and the block is frictionless (we have
decided to ignore friction). The stress state in 2D would be as
shown in fig.3where stresses normal to x, Sx and stresses normal to
y, Sy are both 200 MPa.

Figure 3
Now, we have to decide whether the block is safe from rupture or
not. The dilemma for a person not knowing the failure theories
might be: 200 MPa is less than the ultimate stress of 250 MPa but
there are two such stress, Sx and Sy. Singularly they may not cause
failure but collectively will they cause failure (after all 200+200= 400
and if you have a good imagination: even MPa)? Using failure
theories we can answer such questions.

The answer is: no. They will not cause rupture. The principal stress
state is shown in fig.4.

Figure 4

According to the maximum principal stress theory which is most


popular for rupture of brittle materials, the magnitude of maximum
or the minimum principal stresses must be greater than the ultimate
strength of the material. Since the principal stress is less than the
ultimate strength of the material, it will not rupture…..

Example 3
This is the same as example 2 except that the brittle block is
replaced by a block of ductile material of yield strength 220 MPa
and ultimate strength 350 MPa. The system is shown in fig.5

Figure 5

Since the mechanics of the problem are not changing, the stress
state is the same as the previous example but the material is
different and ductile. Will it yield? Will it rupture?

The most commonly used failure theory for yielding of ductile


isotropic materials is the von Mises theory. As per this theory, failure
occurs when the induced von Mises stress exceeds a critical value.
When the third principal stress = 0,

von Mises stress, Sv =

S1 = 200 MPa, S2 = 200 MPa

ð Sv = 200 MPa
Since the von Mises stress is less than the yield stress, the block is
safe from yielding.

Example 4

Consider the same problem with the block being made of material
with yield point 120 MPa and ultimate stress = 210 MPa.

As in the previous example, the von Mises stress is 200 MPa. So


yielding will occur.

But sometimes we are okay with yielding but not rupture, then we
have to evaluate whether rupture would occur. This is where things
are not very clear. The failure criteria for rupture are not as clear as
failure criteria for yielding.

Some researchers use strain based methods (the strain multiplied


by a function of the Davis triaxilality factor must exceed the rupture
strain for rupture to take place) but most engineers I have seen in
the industry use Principal stress obtained from a nonlinear analysis
as the failure criterion for rupture with the understanding that
rupture occurs when the largest principal stress exceeds the rupture
strength. Alas! I remember one telephonic interview where the
interviewer was not pleased because when asked for rupture
criterion for ductile materials, I mentioned a strain based criterion.

You might also like