Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cognitive Psychology - Final
Cognitive Psychology - Final
memory processes
ENCODING PROCESSES
• SHULMAN’S STUDY:
• ACOUSTIC CODE: Information is encoded based on its - Participants showed similar error rates for words
sound with similar meanings (synonyms) or sounds
- If you hear a new word, you might remember it (homonyms)
by repeating its sound in your mind Þ This indicates some level of semantic encoding in the STM
• SEMANTIC CODE: Information is encoded based on its EVIDENCE FOR VISUAL ENCODING IN THE
meaning STM
- You might remember the word, “dog” because you
know what it refers to • POSNER & KEELE’S STUDY:
- Participants responded faster to visually similar
• VISUAL CODE: Information is encoded based on its visual letters in a letter-matching task
appearance Þ Indicates that they were encoding and comparing the
- You might remember a particular image or text visual appearance of the letters, suggesting a role for
because of how it looks visual encoding in STM
Forms of encoding ENCODING IN THE LTM
Primarily semantic, but visual and acoustic encoding is also
• Memories are encoded to be stored: When we significant
experience something or learn new information, our brain - Flexible
encodes it in a certain way so that it can be stored and EVIDENCE FOR SEMANTIC ENCODING IN LTM
later retrieved
• GROSSMAN & EAGLE:
• Short term vs Long term storage - Participants studied a list of 41 words and were
- Different systems for storing information tested on recognition after a delay.
- Serve different purposes - Distractors included words that were either
- Different encoding strategies semantically related or unrelated to the studied
words
• Different codes: - Participants showed a higher rate of false alarms
- Short term memory = acoustic encoding for semantically related distractors
- Long term memory = semantic encoding Þ Indicated a greater likelihood of semantic confusion
during recall
ENCODING IN THE STM
While encoding is predominantly acoustic in STM, both • BOUSFIELD:
semantic and visual encoding can also occur. - Participants learned a list of 60 words consisting
• When we make errors in retrieving words from short-term of various categories.
memory, the errors tend to reflect confusions in sound - When asked to recall the words, participants
tended to group them into categories, suggesting
Evidence For Acoustic Encoding In Stm semantic clustering
• CONRAD’S STUDY:
- Participants were shown visually presented letters
but tended to remmeber them based on their
sounds rather than their visual appearance.
Þ This suggests that even when information is presented MNEUMONIC TECHNIQUES
visually, it is encoded acoustically in STM *music can serve as a retrieval cue also
CATEGORICAL Organize items into categories.
EVIDENCE FOR SEMANTIC ENCODING IN STM: CLUSTERING
i.e.,: grouping food items into • FROST:
categories like fruits, dairy products, - Participants studied drawings with different
breads and vegetables orientations and semantic categories.
Creating vivid mental images that - After a delay, participants were asked about
link together objects with the same name as the test object.
INTERACTIVE i.e., Imagining using scissors to cut a - Participants responded faster to identical
IMAGES* sock with an apple stuffed in it drawings
helps remember the items “socks”,
“apple” and “scissors” AUTISM AND SEMANTIC ENCODING
Associate new words with previously
memorized words and form • TOICHI & KAMIO
PEGWORD SYSTEM* interactive images between them - Individuals with autism may not encode
information semantically to the same extent as
i.e., One is a “bun”, two is a “shoe”, neurotypical individuals
three is a “tree”
Visualize walking through a familiar • HARRIS et al.
place and linking landmarks with - Less activation in Broca’s area during semantic
METHODS OF LOCI* items to be remembered processing in individuals with autism
i.e., Associating a sock on a house’s Þ Semantic deficits
chimney, a pair of scissors cutting a
tree, etc. Broca’s Area: (frontal lobe)
Form a word or expression where - Speech production
each letter represents another word - Involved in language production
or concept - Motor-related hand movements
ACRONYM - Sensorimotor learning and integration
i.e., using "I AM PACK" to remember
Interactive Images, Acronyms, Wernicke’s Area (temporal lobe)
Method of Loci, Pegwords, Acrostics, - Understanding spoken language
Categories, and Keywords.
Create a sentence where the first TRANSFERRING INFO FROM STM to LTM
letter of each word represents the
initial letter of the items to be
ACROSTIC remembered. CHALLENGES
i.e., “Every Good Boy Does Fine” to
remember the notes on lines of the 1. INTERFERENCE:
treble clef. - Occurs when the retreival of information from LTM is
Link the sound and meaning of a disrupted by the presence of other information.
foreign word with a familiar word
i.e., Associating the French word i.e., If you watch two crime movies with the same actor
KEYWORD SYSTEM and then try to remember the storyline of one, you might
“beurre” with “bear” and visualizing a
bear eating butter to remember the mix it up with the other.
meaning “beure”.
Free Recall = imagery of isolated items > verbal rehearsal 2. DECAY:
Serial Recall = verbal rehearsal > imagery of isolated items - Fading or weakening of memories over time if they
are not reheared or retrieved
THE PROCESS
Evidence for acoustic encoding in Depends on whether the information involves declarative or
ltm nondeclarative memory
• Proactive interference = words at the end of the list • MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE (like the Hippocampus)
• Retroactive interference = words at the beginning of the - Plays a crucial role in autobiographical memory recall
list - LESIONS = impair the recall of recent
• Both types of interference = words in the middle of the autobiographical memories while sparing more remote
list memories
• INTERFERENCE > DECAY (esp. in STM) 1. TRANSIENCE: Memory fades over time, leading to the loss
of details or the context of events
THE CONSTRUCTIVE NATURE OF MEMORY
2. ABSENT-MINDEDNESS: Forgetting occurs due to lapses
• Memory is constructive = prior experiences influence how in attention or awareness
we recall events and what we remember - i.e., forgetting what one was looking for in a room
FLASHBULB MEMORY
Vivid recollections of highly emotional or significant events
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
• Emotional intensity = Accuracy of recall
• Can form under 3 circumstances • PREVALENCE AND ERRORS
1. When the event is important - A significant number of suspects are arrested based
2. Surprising on eyewitness identification
- Errors in EI contribute to wrongful convictions - Demonstrates memory distortion in the lab setting
- Estimates of mistaken EI vary widely but indicate - Participants are given lists of words associated with
potential for alarming errors. critical non-presented word.
- When asked to recall the non-presented word, participants
• CASE EXAMPLE: TIMOTHY’S ACQUITTAL often incorrectly believed they have seen it
- In 1986, Timothy was convicted of brutally murdering - Source monitoring errors and spreading activation
a mother and her two young daughters (Dolan, 1995).
• SKEPTICISM ON REPRESSED MEMORIES
- He was then sentenced to die, and for 2 years and 4
months, Timothy lived on death row. 1- Implanting False Memories
Therapists may unintentionally implant false memories in
- Although the physical evidence did not point to their clients → unreliable testimony
Timothy, eyewitness testimony placed him near
the scene of the crime at the time of the murder. 2- Difficulty In Verifying Memories:
Memories of past trauma, especially childhood, may lack
- Subsequently, it was discovered that a man who evidence to verify their accuracy, making it hard to
looked like Timothy was a frequent visitor to the confirm whether they’re genuine or fabricated
neighborhood of the murder victims.
3- Lack Of Compelling Evidence:
- Timothy received a second trial and was acquitted. Scientific evidence supporting the existence of
repressed memories is limited. Studies on memory
• INFLUENCE OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY distortion suggest that memories can be easily
- Influence jury decisions influenced, raising doubts about their reliability.
´ Placing greater weight on the confidence of the
witness, even if the details are inconsistent or 4- Alternative Explanations:
lacking - Source Monitoring Errors: Process of attributing the
origin of a memory or piece of information to a particular
- People may fabricate memories based on suggestions source
or imagined scenarios, leading to inaccuracies in their i.e., whether it was experienced firsthand, heard from
testimony. someone else, or imagined
• FACTORS INFLUENCING EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY - Spreading Activation: A cognitive process that occurs
- Lineup procedures when the activation of one concept or memory triggers
- Confessions the activation of related concepts or memories in memory
- Lineup feedback networks
- Stress levels i.e., if someone hears the word “dog,” related concepts
- Race such as “pet,” “barking,” might also become activated in
- Severity of the crime their mind.
• CHILDREN AS EYEWITNESSES CONTEXT EFFECTS ON MEMORY
- Susceptible to suggestion and distortion
- Younger children are more susceptible to suggestive FACTORS THAT CAN INFLUENCE MEMORY RETRIEVAL: :
questioning and pressure from authority figures - Emotions
- May also have difficulty distinguishing between - Moods
actual observations and stories they’ve heard → - States of consciousness
inaccuracies in their testimony - External contexts
REPRESSED MEMORIES • Encoding specifity the principle that what is recalled
Memories that are alleged to have been pushed down into the depends on what was encoded.
unconscious mind due to the distress they cause. - Memories encoded in a particular mood or physical
environment may be more readily retrieved in a similar
context
• Self-generated retrieval cues (self-reference effect) >
• ROEDIGER-MCDERMOTT PARADIGM cues provided by ot
PROPOSITIONAL THEORY
• THEORY: Instead of storing information in the form of
mental images, the mind uses a “generic” code known as
propositional representation
- Stores the meaning of concepts rather than their visual or
imaginal forms
Proposition: The underlying meaning of a particular relationship
among concepts.
- Represents the meaning of a relationship in an abstract
form.
and patterns of activation may vary depending on the
presence or absence of sensory input.
FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCY HYPOTHESIS: Mental imagery
and sensory perception share similarities in how they are
processed by the brain
- Mental images can accomplish similar goals as actual
perception
When we imagine something, our brains engage in
processes functionally similar to those used during actual
perception.
- Mental imagery = active cognitive process
- Concrete objects: images > propositions
- Similar brain activation patterns (frontal & parietal)
Implications of Reduced Information Processing during
Imagery:
• Absence of visual input during mental imagery reduces
information processing demands in the brain compared
to sensory perception
- Less differentiation between brain regions and signals
LIMITATIONS OF PROPOSITIONAL THEORY
MENTAL ROTATIONS
Imagine you have a picture of an object in your mind, like a
toy car. Mental rotation is when you mentally turn that car
around in your head, just like you would if you were physically
doing it.
Study:
- Scientists showed people pictures of
3D shapes and asked them if the
shapes were rotated versions of each
other.
Research by Lee, Kravitz, & Baker (2012): - The time it took people to decided
• Participants were familiarized with images of objects and increased as the shapes were rotated
instructed to either view the objects or mentally visualize more (in the picture OR in-depth)
them. linear function
• The researchers found that while both imagery and
perception activated similar brain regions, the levels of
activation and contributions of these regions differed
based on whether participants viewed the actual objects or
imagined them.
• This suggests that while sensory perception and mental
imagery engage common neural networks, the intensity
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL JOHNSON-LAIRD’S MENTAL MODELS
ROTATION Mental representations can take three forms:
1. PROPOSITIONAL REPRESENTATIONS:
• Men and women might use their brains differently when Abstract representations of meaning, verbally
doing mental rotation tasks expressible
- Parietal action = women < men
- Inferior Frontal action = women > men 2. MENTAL IMAGERY:
Mental pictures or scenes we can visualize
• SPATIAL TASKS:
- Women = both sides of the brain 3. MENTAL MODELS:
- Men = right side Mental versions of real-life situations, based on
what we believe about them
IMAGE SCALING
Study:
Study: People were asked to imagine pairs of animals of - Some participants got clear instructions about where
different sizes and it took them longer to describe the smaller things were (determinate descriptions), while others got
animals vague instructions (indeterminate descriptions)
- Mental images = actual perceptions
i.e., a clear description → “Washington, D.C., is between
IMAGE SCANNING Alexandria, Virginia and Baltimore, Maryland”
Study: People can mentally scan a map in their minds, and the i.e., a vague description → “It’s between the Pacific Ocean and
time it takes them to find a location depends on how far it is the Atlantic Ocean”
on the map.
- Almost perfect linear relation Findings:
- Participants encoded the map in the form of an image • Determinate descriptions → people tended to add more
details to their mental picture than what was actually
REPRESENTATIONAL NEGLECT described
- BUT they didn’t remember the exact words very well
Study: People with this neglect had trouble remembering - They were using mental models
details from one side of the imaginary scene they were asked
to picture • Indeterminate descriptions → didn’t add as much extra
- Spatial neglect and representational neglect can occur detail to their mental picture
independently - Remembered the exact words of the description better
- Relied more on remembering the words than forming a
SYNTHESIZING IMAGES AND PROPOSITIONS detailed mental model
• Two Views of Knowledge Representation SPATIAL COGNITION AND COGNITIVE MAPS
There are two main theories about how we represent This is about how we understand space around us and how we
knowledge: create mental maps of our environment
1. Dual Code theory: Knowledge is stored in both images and
symbols RATS, BEES, PIGEONS AND HUMANS
2. Propositional theory: Knowledge is represented only in
Scientists studied how different animals navigate their
underlying propositions, not images or symbols surroundings
- Edward Tolman = Rats
• Functionality of Mental Imagery: - Von Frisch = Bees
Mental image = Sensory perception - Thorndyke = Humans
- Mental rotations
- Image scaling Findings: Like rats and bees, humans use their hippocampus
- Image scanning to form mental maps.
• Limits of Analogy between Perception & Imagery TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN COGNITIVE MAPS
Some studies involving ambiguous figures and unfamiliar
mental manipulations suggest that there are limits to how a. Landmark Knowledge: Knowing special buildings or
much mental imagery resembles perception landmarks that help us find our way
- When the images are confusing or unfamiliar, our mental
pictures might not work the same way as real ones
b. Route-road Knowledge: Understanding how to get from
one place to another by following a specific road or path HOW PEOPLE CREATE COGNITIVE MAPS
When we imagine these maps, we use both visual (analogical)
c. Survey Knowledge: Having a big-picture view of how and abstract thinking (propositional)
different places are connected on the map - We might visualize the layout in our minds, BUT also think
logically about how these places are related to each other
Concepts: mental representations of categories or ideas - Each feature is necessary (and sufficient) in this concept.
- Helps us understand and categorize the world around us → Defining features
i.e., the concept of “bird” includes animals like sparrows, eagles i.e. for something to be X, it must have that feature
and penguins
- Linguists use this more (everything just seems much more
Categories: groups of related concepts organized in a hierarchy orderly and systematic)
i.e., within the category of “birds”, we have subcategories like - It does not work as well.
“songbirds,” “birds of prey,” and “waterfowl”
1- Natural Categories: groupings that occur naturally in
the world • PROTOTYPE THEORY: Concepts are categorized based on
i.e., bird or trees their similarity to an average representation or prototype
of the category
2- Artifact Categories: groupings that are invented to
serve a particular purpose or function i.e., when we think of a bird, we might first picture a typical
i.e., kitchen appliances, automobiles bird like a robin, rather than considering all the defining
features of a bird.
HOW DO PEOPLE DECIDE WHAT OBJECTS TO PUT IN A
CATEGORY? - Characteristic features are very important in this theory.
1. We put objects into one category if it has several i.e., Robins seem much more like a bird than an ostrich,
defining features because it can fly
2. We compare an object with an average representation
(prototype) to decide whether it fits into that category - Defining features are shared throughout all in a category.
3. People can categorize based on their own theories about i.e., however, flying is not a defining feature because,
those objects although it’s typical that birds fly, ostriches cannot fly
Superordinate = General (i.e., “fruit”)
CLASSICAL AND FUZZY CONCEPTS STUDY: Children (5-10 yrs) were presented with descriptions of
individuals exhibiting unusual behaviors, and they were asked to
• Classical Concepts associate these descriptions with the label of “robber”
- Categories with clear and precisely defined boundaries
- Objects either belong or do not, based on defining 1st person: “a smelly, mean old man with a gun in his pocket
features who came to your house and took your TV set because your
parents didn’t want it anymore and told him he could have it.”
i.e., a shape with three sides and three angles is definitively a
“triangle” 2nd person: “a very friendly and cheerful woman who gave you
a hug, but then disconnected your toilet bowl and took it away
• Fuzzy Concepts without permission and with no intention to return it.”
- Less clear boundaries and may vary in membership
depending on context or interpretation Findings:
- Often involve subjective or context-dependent criteria • Younger Children: associated the label of “robber” with
individuals displaying characteristic features (i.e., being
i.e., the category of “art” may include a wide range of diverse mean or carrying a weapon)
works, and what qualifies as “art” may not be the same for
everyone • Older Children: began to consider defining features (i.e.,
act of stealing) in their categorization judgments
REAL-WORLD EXAMPLES: USING EXEMPLARS • Transition: the shift from focusing solely on characteristic
Exemplars: Typical representations of a category features to incorporating defining features was still fuzzy,
- Doesn’t have to be an average of ALL objects even as children matured
• DISCREPANCY B/W CORE AND PROTOTYPE • Description of the Sorp: The sorp initially resembled a
- White collar criminals: individuals engaging in bird but underwent changes after exposure to hazardous
sophisticated financial crimes like embezzlement may not chemicals, resulting in the growth of additional legs and
fit the typical image of a robber the loss of feathers.
- Marginalized individuals: people from disadvantaged • Description of the Doon: The doon, initially identical to
communities may be wrongly perceived as robbers due to the sorp, shed its feathers and developed characteristics
their alignment with societal stereotypes, even if they similar to the transformed sorp through a natural
haven’t committed theft biological process.
• Participant Ratings: After reading about the sorp and the
doon, participants provided ratings on:
• Whether each creature fit into the category of "bird." - i.e., verifying “A shark is an animal” took longer than “A
Þ Category membership shark is a fish” because “animal” is a more remote
superordinate category than “fish”
• The similarity of each creature to birds
Þ .Similarity
SCHEMAS
Schemas: mental framework for organizing knowledge, creating PROCEDURAL MEMORY
a meaninful structure of related concepts Knowledge of how to perform tasks or actions, often without
i.e., a kitchen schema outlines the typical items found in a the need for conscious awareness or explicit verbalization
kitchen and where to find them
• NATURE OF PROCEDURAL MEMORY:
SCRIPTS - Procedural knowledge encompasses
understanding how to perform tasks, skills or
Scripts: specific type of schema that describes the specific action
sequence of events expected to occur in a particular situation - Knowing how to do something rather than
i.e., restaurant visitation knowing facts or information about it
- Include information about:
1. Props: a menu, food, a bill and money • IMPLICIT NATURE:
2. Roles: a waiter, a customer a chef - Once procedural memory is acquired, it becomes
3. Opening Conditions: the hungry customer has money implicit (individuals may not be consciously aware
4. Scenes: entering, ordering, eating, paying of the knowledge but can demonstrate it through
5. Outcomes: the customer has less money, owner has more their actions)
money, the customer is no longer hungry
• RAPID RETRIEVAL:
Scripts enable us to use a mental framework for acting in - Can typically be retrieved and utilized more
certain situations when we must fill in apparent gaps within a quickly than decorative knowledge
given context.
• SERIAL PROCESSING:
• Study: Participants were presented with stories and asked - Information in procedural knowledge is often
to recall or recognize elements from them. processed in a serial manner
- Recall tasks: participants often recalled elements that - Actions are carried out sequentially (one after
were not explicitly stated in the stories but were part of another)
the scripts they represented
- Recognition tasks: participants were more likely to • PRODUCTION SYSTEM: Can be represented and
attribute sentences to stories if they were script-relevant, organized using a production system, which consists of:
- rules specifying conditions (if-clauses)
• Findings: Scripts guide recall and recognition (what - correspondng actions (then-clauses)
people know) - These rules guide behavior and decision making
THE TYPICALITY EFFECT EXAMPLE: A pedestrian crossing the street at a traffic light-
The phenomenon were atypical information is more readily controlled intersection
recalled during script learning than typical information. - Red light = stop
- Green light = go
Atypical information = more processing effort - Left foot on pavement = step with the right foot
- Right foot on pavement = step with the left foot
- In cases of closed-head injuries (i.e., strong blow to the
head), the typicality effect disappears, and individuals The production system guides the execution of actions based
have EQUAL recall of typical and atypical information on specific conditions.
i.e., when crossing the street, the pedestrian follows the rules
dictated by the traffic light’s color and the position of their
feet
NON-DECLARATIVE KNOWLEDGE
knowledge is organized Various forms of implicit knowledge that individuals possess
- EACH form of organization = different purposes
- Different methods = different situations • FORMS OF NONDECLARATIVE KNOWLEDGE
1) Perceptual, Motor, and Cognitive Skills (Procedural
Knowledge): Knowing how to perform tasks or skills
(i.e., riding a bike or solving a puzzle)
2) Simple Associative Knowledge: Associations formed
through classical or operant conditioning, where
stimuli become linked with responses
3) Simple Nonassociative Knowledge: Involves changes
in behavior due to repeated exposure to a stimulus
(i.e., habituation = decreased response to stimuli /
sensitization = increased response to stimuli)
Different languages → different cognitive systems STUDY: When objects were unintentionally broken,
- Affects how people understand and perceive the - English speakers were more likely to use agentive
world language (i.e., “he crushed the can.”)
- Spanish speakers used non-agentive language (i.e.,
Sapir: Language habits influence how we interpret experiences “the can was crushed.”)
Whorf: Language organizes our perception of the world - Language did not influence participants’ memory for
intentional “accidents”, but when something is broken
• Milder form of linguistic relativism: by accident, English speakers were able to remember
- While language may not entirely determine thought, agents better
it influences it.
LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY VS LINGUISTIC
1. Labelling Ambiguous Figures: UNIVERSALS
- When participants are given a label for an ambiguous
figure, it influences how they perceive and remember Linguistic Universals: refer to patterns found across ALL
it. languages, suggesting common structure/rules
i..e, labelling a figure as “eyeglasses” or “dumbbells” Deep Structure (Noam Chomsky): syntax of all languages
changes how participants draw the figure
color naming across languages:
• Basic Color Terms: (Berlin and Kay)
The specific boundaries and number of color categories can • Sapir and Whorf's Thesis: They proposed that language
vary significantly between cultures. Some languages have more significantly shapes thought.
distinctions (e.g., light blue vs. dark blue), while others have - Dialectic in action
fewer basic color terms.
• Subsequent Research: Some psychologists aimed to show
3. Influence on Perception and Cognition that language does not control thought.
The names and categories we use for colors can affect how we modern perspective:
perceive and think about them. Language influences our ability
to differentiate and remember colors, showing that how we • Synthesis View: Most psychologists today agree that
describe colors can shape our perception. language influences thought, but not as strongly as Sapir
and Whorf suggested.
VERBS AND GRAMMATICAL GENDER
• Interaction Over Time: Language and thought
• Rules and categories in a language can shape how continuously influence each other throughout a person’s
speakers perceive and think about the world life (Vygotsky, 1986).
• Bilingual Insights: studying bilinguals helps understand eye movement and reading
how multiple languages influence cognitive processes
• Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes:
• Prepositions and Perception: Different languages - how long readers look at words = cognitive processing
categorize spatial relationships differently, affecting how i.e., readers look longer at low-frequency words (e..g.,
vituperative) than high-frequency words (e..g., house)
• Critical in understanding how we process written language 2. DUAL SYSTEM HYPOTHESIS:
moment-to-moment - Each language is represented in separate systems or
regions of the brain
• Highlights the impact of word frequency and preview - STUDY: Languages might be stored in distinct areas,
information on reading, supporting the idea that cognitive allowing for differential access and processing
processing drives eye movements
i.e., German and English language information might
BILINGUISM AND DIALECTS be stored in different parts of the brain
• Effective second-language learning experiences vary based • When the speech production mechanism fails to align with
on individual cognitive abilities and the specific context in cognitive intentions
which the second language will be used
• Errors may be caused by:
• Tailoring learning experiences to the individual’s needs and - intrusions of other thoughts
future language use is crucial - environmental stimuli (i.e., background noise or
nearby conversations)
Bilingusim: One System or Two?
METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE
1. SINGLE SYSTEM HYPOTHESIS: Metaphors: a figure of speech that implicitly compares two
- Both languages are represented in one integrated unrelated things, typically by stating that one thing is another
system or brain region
- STUDY: early bilinguals who learn two languages i.e., “your room is a pigsty.”
simultaneously, may have a single, unified language
system in the brain Similes: compare items using “like” or “as”
social function
• Enriching communication: metaphors add depth and
nuance to language, enhancing social interactions
i.e., saying “you are a prince” suggests that the person
possesses qualities associated with royalty (e.g., nobility or
generosity)
• Word Recognition: fMRI studies show that the middle • SUBCORTICAL DIFFERENCES:
part of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) responds - Possible subcortical differences in linguistic function
strongly to speech sounds, predominantly in the left complicate the interpretation of gender-based
hemisphere language localization
The brain and sign language: 3. GLOBAL APHASIA:
- Severe impairment in both comprehension and
• Brain Processing: both signing and speech are processed speech production
similarly in terms of linguistic function in the brain - Lesions affecting both Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas,
commonly resulting from strokes
• Lesion Effects: Lesions affecting speech also impact
signing, indicating a shared neurological basis 4. ANOMIC APHASIA:
- Difficulty in naming objects or retrieving words
• Implications: sign language is not merely a spatial or - SYMPTOMS:
Þ inability to name objects upon seeing them
nonlinguistic form of communication but engages language
Þ specific difficulties in recalling names, such as
processing mechanisms in the brain
those of living things
Aphasia
AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
Aphasia: language impairment resulting from brain damage
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): developmental disorder
marked by abnormalities in social behavior, language and
cognition.
- Has biological origins, with identified genetic
associations
BRAIN ABNORMALITIES:
LANGUAGE CHARACTERISTICS:
ISOMORPHIC PROBLEMS
Games like:
strategies to solve problems - Scrabble
- Boggle
Algorithms: sets of procedures that guarantee a solution if
followed correctly
- Systematic and repeatable challenges in detecting isomorphism
i.e., a step by step method for solving a math problem • Structural Similarity Detection: challenging to recognize
the structural similarities when the surface characteristics
Heuristics: informal, intuitive and speculative strategies that differ sharply
sometimes lead to a solution
- Efficient but does not guarantee a correct solution • Problem Solving Strategy Transfer: applying strategies
from one problem to another becomes difficult when the
problems’ contents differ significantly
i.e., people think shark attacks are more likely than plane
accidents due to the availability heuristic (shark attacks are
more common) insight
Metcalfe and Weiebe distinguished between insightful • Gradual Insight: insights can develop incrementally over
(productive) and non-insightful (reproductive) problem solving time as the solver processes and re-evaluates the problem
Routine problems: solvers can usually predict their success • Sleep and Insight: sleep can facilitate the emergence of
accurately insightful solutions, particularly in mathematical problem-
solving and tasks requiring an understanding of rules
Insight problems: solvers often cannot predict their success
accurately • Insight Accuracy: can be accurate or wrong.
- Those who eventually solve the problem may initially - Mental traps can mislead individuals, causing them to
feel pessimistic, while those who fail may feel overly pursue incorrect solutions
optimistic
neuroscience and insight
1. Right Hippocampus: fMRI studies showed that it is active
during problem-solving (particularly when insight is
involved)
2. Right Anterior Temporal Lobe: spike in activity here just
before someone experiences insight
3. Frontal Lobe Activation: activation that occurs before
viewing a problem can predict whether an individual will
later generate an insightful solution
1) MENTAL SET: when you keep using the same solution for
different problems because it worked it the past
If you always use the same formula to solve math
problems, you might not see an easier way to solve a new
- Those who do solve them often don’t expect to, and problem.
those who don’t solve them often think they will. ´ Relying on familiar but ineffective strategies
´ Assumptions may be made without conscious
realization → restricting the ability to see alternative
solutions
´ Can make you stuck using an old strategy even when
a new one is better
STUDY: When people solved problems with a hard strategy TRANSFER OF ANALOGIES
first, they kept using it even when an easier one was available.
Those who didn't start with the hard problems found the easy Analogical Problem Solving: using the solution of a previous
solution quickly. problem to help solve a new, similar problem
- Uses similarities between problems to find solutions
2) FUNCTIONAL FIXEDNESS: when you can’t see objects as
having uses other than their usual ones A. Military Problem: A general wants to capture a
If you only think of a box as a container, you might not fortress. Small groups can safely travel down mined
see that you can use it as a stand to solve a problem. roads, but a large force will detonate the mines. The
strategy is to divide the large force into smaller
Karl Duncker’s Candle Problem: groups, each taking different roads to converge on
- Task: Fix a candle to the wall without dripping wax on the the fortress simultaneously.
floor.
- Materials: Candles, a box of matches, and tacks.
- Finding: People who saw the box as just a container had a
harder time solving the problem because they didn't think B. Medical Problem: A doctor wants to destroy a tumor
to use the box as a candle holder. with X-rays. High-intensity X-rays destroy both the
tumor and healthy tissue, while low-intensity X-rays
3) STEREOTYPES: generalized beliefs about a group of are ineffective. The strategy is to use multiple low-
people intensity rays from different angles to converge on
Thinking all athletes are not good in academics. the tumor, effectively destroying it without harming
´ Can make you assume things about people that aren’t the surrounding tissue.
true and affect your judgments and decisions
Imagine you're trying to fix a leaky pipe. You have tape and
a clamp.
• If you only think of the tape as something to wrap gifts
(functional fixedness), you might not realize you can use
it to temporarily seal the leak.
• Or, if you've always used a wrench to tighten bolts
(mental set), you might not think of using pliers, which
could be quicker for this specific situation.
• And if you believe only plumbers can fix leaks
(stereotype), you might not even try to solve the problem • To find analogies between two problems, you’d have to
yourself, even if it's simple. first perceive the relationship between them.
• Accepting of themselves
• Impulsive
• Ambitious and driven
• Dominant
• Sometimes hostile
NEUROSCIENCE OF CREATIVITY