Art and music classes should not be mandatory at school.

To what extent do you agree

or disagree?

It is widely acknowledged that schools should not force students to engage in art and music
classes. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, i would contend that these two subjects
also have numerous benefits for educatees.
On the one hand, it is conceivable why some subscribe to the view that students have no
obligation to participate in art and music classes. Especially the key rationale is that art and
music are those subjects that require certain meticulousness and special talent that not every
pupil possesses. An obvious illustration of this is that some students are not good at painting,
singing or dancing. Thus, students can be embarrassed if made to perform art in classes, which
may produce negative impacts on their mental health. Therefore, it seems justifiable to not
require students to attend these classes.
Nevertheless, i concur that these two categories also offer a host of advantages for several
reasons. First, performing art can enhance student’s imagination. To be more specific, different
art and musical subjects can help youngsters to be more creative and sharpen their cognitive
skills. This is beneficial because it boosts their ability to produce some unique ideas, thereby
getting them well-prepared for their future prospect. Second, making art and music compulsory
at schools makes students to grow interest in non-academic subjects and get hands-on
experience in these fields. This is specifically advantageous for those who possess special gift
or passion for drawing, singing or dancing, as it gives them a platform where they can develop
and perfect their artistic skills from an early age. Therefore, it is easier for them to pursue their
creative career afterwards.
In conclusion, while art and music education should not be compulsory in schools, i am
convinced that there are additionally multiple benefits to these two courses for educatees as
well.