Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modeling Deterioration in Concrete Pipes As A StochasticGamma Process For Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis
Modeling Deterioration in Concrete Pipes As A StochasticGamma Process For Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis
net/publication/236333520
CITATIONS READS
42 974
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dr. Mojtaba Mahmoodian on 01 February 2014.
Abstract: Concrete sewer pipes encounter corrosion as a predominant form of deterioration that reduces the service life of the pipeline
system and increases the costs of maintenance and rehabilitation. Reliability analysis can help pipeline owners and sewer-system managers to
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Greenwich University on 09/04/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
predict the service life of the pipes and the time for repair or replacement. To include uncertainties in the reliability analysis, the corrosion
process can be considered a stochastic process. This paper presents a stochastic gamma process model to account for temporal variability and
uncertainties associated with the corrosion process in concrete sewer pipes that typically increase the probability of failure with the aging of
the pipe. The proposed methodology is then applied to a specific concrete sewer system. The key element of the proposed method is the use
of the gamma process concept. A gamma process can model the monotonic behavior of the ageing and deteriorating process. The application
of the gamma process presented in this paper can potentially contribute to widening the use of stochastic processes for the modeling of
structural degradation processes such as wear, fatigue, corrosion, crack, erosion, and creep. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204
.0000145. © 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
CE Database subject headings: Stochastic models; Time Dependence; Probability; Failures; Concrete pipes; Sulfides; Corrosion;
Reliability.
Author keywords: Stochastic modeling; Time-dependent reliability analysis; Probability of failure; Concrete pipes; Sulfide corrosion;
Gamma process.
The mathematical definition of the gamma process is given in Table 1. Typical Values for Exponential Parameter, b, in Different
Eq. (1). Recall that a random quantity d has a gamma distribution Deterioration Types
with shape parameter α > 0 and scale parameter λ > 0 if its prob-
Exponential
ability density function is given by
Deterioration type parameter, b Reference
λα α−1 −λd Degradation of concrete 1 Ellingwood and Mori (1993)
Gaðdjα; λÞ ¼ d e ð1Þ
ΓðαÞ due to reinforcement
corrosion
where αðtÞ = a nondecreasing, right continuous, real-valued func- Sulfate attack 2 Ellingwood and Mori (1993)
tion for t ≥ 0, and αð0Þ ¼ 0. The gamma process is a continuous- Diffusion-controlled aging 0.5 Ellingwood and Mori (1993)
time stochastic process ½dðtÞ; t ≥ 0 with the following properties: Creep 1=8 Cinlar et al. (1977)
• dð0Þ ¼ 0 with probability of one; Expected scour-hole depth 0.4 Hoffmans and Pilarczyk (1995),
• dðτ Þ − dðtÞ ∼ Ga½αðτ Þ − αðtÞ; λ for all τ > t ≥ 0; and and van Noortwijk and Klatter
(1999)
• dðtÞ has independent increments.
Table 2. Shape and Scale Parameters Estimated from the Two Presented
Methods
0 Maximum likelihood
t1 t2 Time
Parameter estimation method Method of moments
Fig. 1. Time-dependent degradation model in case of two inspections αðtÞ 0.17t 0.094t
(deterministic path) λ 0.425 0.235
Probability of failure
0.7 0.7 2 Inspections
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.5 4 Inspections
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
Method of Maximum Likelihood
0.2 0.2
Method of Moments
0.1 0.1
0 0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Time (year) Time (year)
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Greenwich University on 09/04/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Fig. 2. Probability of failure for different methods of estimation Fig. 4. Probability of failure for different number of inspections
the gamma process.” ASTIN Bulletin, 21(2), 177–192. Singpurwalla, N. (1997). “Gamma processes and their generalizations:
Ellingwood, B. R., and Mori, Y. (1993). “Probabilistic methods for condi- An overview.” Engineering probabilistic design and maintenance for
tion assessment and life prediction of concrete structures in nuclear flood protection, R. Cooke, M. Mendel, and H. Vrijling, eds., Kluwer
power plants.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 142, 155–166. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 67–75.
Ferguson, T. S., and Klass, M. J. (1972). “A representation of independent van der Weide, H. (1997). “Gamma processes.” Engineering probabilistic
increment processes without Gaussian components.” Ann. Math. Stat., design and maintenance for flood protection, R. Cooke, M. Mendel,
43(5), 1634–1643. and H. Vrijling, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
Hau, Y., Clarke, B., Howes, C., Cunningham, R., and Mathews, M. (2005). The Netherlands, 77–83.
“Defects in sewer pipe joints and water tests.” Proc. Institution of Civil van Noortwijk, J. M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Two probabilistic
Engineers, Water Management 158, Institution of Civil Engineers, U.K. life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures.”
Vol. WM3, 119–125. Probab. Eng. Mech., 19(4), 345–359, 77–83.
Hoffmans, G. J. C. M., and Pilarczyk, K. W. (1995). “Local scour down- van Noortwijk, J. M., and Klatter, H. E. (1999). “Optimal inspection
stream of hydraulic structures.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(4), 326–340. decisions for the block mats of the Eastern-Scheldt barrier.” Reliab.
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). (2009). ICE State of The Nation Rep. Eng. Syst. Saf., 65(3), 203–211.
Defending Critical Infrastructure, State of the Nation reports, Institu- van Noortwijk, J. M., and Pandey, M. D. (2003). “A stochastic deterioration
tion of Civil Engineers, London. process for time-dependent reliability analysis” Proc. of the Eleventh
Kienow, K. E., and Kienow, K. K. (2004). “Risk management, predicting Int. Federation of Information Processing Working Group 7.5 Working
your next concrete pipe sewer failure before it happens.” ASCE Int. Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, Banff,
Conf. on Pipelines, ASCE, San Diego. Canada, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 259–265.
Li, S. X., Yu, S. R., Zeng, H. L., Li, J. H., and Liang, R. (2009). “Predicting van Noortwijk, J. M., van der Weide, J. A. M., Kallen, M. J., and Pandey,
corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines with a mechanically- M. D. (2007). “Gamma processes and peaks-over-threshold distribu-
based probabilistic model.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 65(3–4), 162–166. tions for time-dependent reliability.” J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92(12),
Mahmoodian, M., and Li, C. Q. (2011). “Service life prediction of under- 1651–1658.
ground concrete pipes subjected to corrosion.” 4th Int. Conf. on Concrete Wenocur, M. L. (1989). “A reliability model based on the gamma process
Repair, Concrete Solutions, Taylor and Francis Group, London. and its analytic theory.” Adv. Appl. Probab., 21(4), 899–918.