Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1-s2.0-S2214785322000906-main (1)
1-s2.0-S2214785322000906-main (1)
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Digital dental scanners are devices which are used to capture optical impression of intra and extra oral
Available online 31 January 2022 structures of the patient’s mouth. The basic principle of digital scanning is based upon optical phenomena
like optical triangulation, coherence tomography, parallel confocal imaging and three-dimensional
Keywords: motion videos capturing technique. In orthodontic practice, digital scanners can be successfully used
Optical triangulation in efficient treatment planning, custom appliance fabrication, clear aligner technology and orthognathic
Coherence tomography surgical simulation. From digital record keeping, digital cast models, occlusogram, extra oral and intra
Parallel confocal
oral scanners to software for cephalometric analysis, etc. have taken the orthodontic practice to newer
Accordion fringe interferometry
Three dimensional in motion videos
heights. Intraoral digital scanner that utilizes the parallel-confocal imaging technology and point and
stitch reconstruction to generate digital impressions which are accurate and powder free. Digitization
has revolutionized the conventional orthodontics completely. In modern day orthodontic dental practice
digital extra-oral and intra-oral scans are used to fabricate working and study cast models that facilitates
construction of fixed orthodontic appliances, retainers and custom trays for lingual orthodontic proce-
dures. Digital scanners are the new face of impression making and digital cast fabrication in dentistry.
This review aims to identify advantages of utilising digitally scanned impressions over the conventional
impression making techniques and application of digital scanning technology pertaining to the speciality
of orthodontics in dental practice.
Copyright Ó 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Confer-
ence on Materials, Machines and Information Technology-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.064
2214-7853/Copyright Ó 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials, Machines and Information Technology-2022.
S. Sehrawat, A. Kumar, S. Grover et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 56 (2022) 186–193
Fig. 2. Common digital imaging technologies. (a) Triangulation. (b) Parallel confocal imaging. (c) Accordion fringe interferometry. (d) Three-dimensional in-motion video
imaging [3].
tal dental cast for study models. These models offer the clinician an due to the unique curvature of the scanned object. Fringe curvature
efficient way to perform model analysis to formulate a good treat- is defined as the distortion in the original pattern of the object sub-
ment plan for a clinical solution. jected to AFI (Fig. 2c). A high definition camera with a video feature
is successful to record specific point and features of fringe
2.3. Parallel confocal curvature.
3. Digital intra oral and extra oral scanning oral structures in adults and adolescent even with restricted mouth
opening as in cases of trismus disease [11].
In modern dental practice, patients prefer short and efficient Added benefit of scanned data comprises of easy and efficient
treatment appointments. Timetabling the appointment slots and sharing of the gathered information among the dentist in different
spaces is the prime concern for the clinicians [7]. Digital impres- clinics at the same time. I tero scanners are already leaders in den-
sion making and dental cast fabrication has reduced the chair side tal technology. Scanning of extra oral cast model is also possible
time and fatigue considerably. Digital scanners can be utilized for using it (Fig. 4).
various functions like clear aligner mechanics, design and con- Its latest version popularly known as Element I tero is nearly 20
struction of customized palatal and lingual appliances, wafer con- times steady and faster than conventional scanner which records
struction and orthognathic surgery simulation, fabrication of tray 6000 frames per second. It differs from the I tero scanner by incor-
in indirect bonding, treatment planning and more currently for porating a built in control for better stability along with a lighter
surgical results score among patients with cleft palate and cleft and flexible wand. The novel version of the scanner records dental
lip abnormalities [8]. There are many advantages with the use of hard and soft tissue as fast as 3 min time. The open scanning sys-
digital intraoral scanners but one of the prime advantages is the tem is further a boon empowering the clinician in a digital work
elimination of drawbacks identified with traditional impression- flow to flexibly scan, store and share the recorded data [12]. The
taking which is known to be technique sensitive. 3D scans have intercommunication between two professionals and a professional
become an integral part of modern clinical orthodontic practice. and a lab is also supported with this digital scanning technology.
Various issues had been reported with the use of PVS and alginate These I-tero scanner (Fig. 5) features wand which orthodontist
impressions such as improper tooth-to-tray union, segregation of moves around patients teeth and surrounding soft tissues and in
the material from impression tray, bubbles formation, tearing of latest versions, this wand helps in capturing a series of frames
the material, pull, voids formation, temperature susceptibility, which can be organised to reproduce the exact morphology and
confined working time, shrinkage of material, improper pouring, visualization of the subject’s oral architecture.
over trimming of the study model, and damage during transporta- Uses of –I tero scanners in Orthodontics
tion [9]. Digital scanning is more satisfactory to the patients than
traditional impression-taking because of its comfortable approach I tero scanners are used to obtain accurate pre treatment record.
and convenience. Various elements of impression materials are Impression making procedures.
believed to cause allergies in few patients which can be eliminated Fabrication of appliances and retainers.
with the use of digital scanning. Utilization of digital scanning is Used along with Invisalign treatment.
also advantageous to orthodontics in various aspects like
decreased treatment time, enhanced diagnosis and treatment plan- The digital itero scanners captures the teeth and surrounding
ning, user-friendly, refined appliance efficiency, rapid data compli- structures using latest optical technology. Once the process is
ance to the laboratories, and improved system. Intraoral laser started, orthodontist can stop or start as many times as necessary.
scanners (ILS) can be utilized to scan both white and yellow dental Scanning can be done without any radiation. In as little as two to
cast. Lesser scanning time was required to scan the yellow dental three minutes a digitally perfect 3D impressions are obtained [13].
casts compared to orthodontic type III white casts [10]. Advantages of I-tero scanners includes
3.1. I teroScanner Comfort: The 3D scanning is often much more comfortable for
patients.
Based on the principal of parallel confocal scanning technology, Quality: Digital impressions limit the margin for error and
Cadent USA in 2007 introduced a digital scanning system named I distortion.
tero. It is capable of performing fastest scanning based on as many Cost effective: 3D scanning costs the same as traditional
as 1,00,000 laser ray points to produce image of 300 units of focal impression.
depth spaced as apart as less than 50 mm. Pertaining to the oral
cavity this scanner captures and records teeth and perioral struc-
tures without the aid of any adjunct scanning powder. Anatomical
abnormalities such as tori can also be recorded with accuracy
which is not possible with conventional impression making proce-
dure. I tero (Fig. 3) is a successful scanner to record details of intra
Fig. 3. Digital intra oral scanning [11]. Fig. 4. Digital extra oral scanning [11].
189
S. Sehrawat, A. Kumar, S. Grover et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 56 (2022) 186–193
terns’ are distorted due to the curvature of scanned surface the 4. Applications of digital scanners in the orthodontic domain
deflected beam is received by the inbuilt camera of scanner tip
to fabricate life like images. Both the camera and the source are Intraoral digital scanner that utilizes the parallel-confocal imag-
positioned at different geometry and lie offset to each other. These ing technology and point-and-stitch reconstruction to generate
scanners are a convenient portable system composed of a touch digital impressions which are accurate and powder free. The stan-
sensitive software and a flexible handle with disposable tips that dard I tero unit comprises of a monitor screen with liquid display
must be changed after every scanning to avoid surface contamina- with a flexible wand and a keyboard for data entry [23]. The unit
tion [19]. The Lythos scanner is very popular amongst the dental can be moved with the help of a mobile cart which is very advan-
surgeons owing to the ease of use and precision of the scans tageous for both the patient and practitioner and the data synchro-
(Fig. 8). nize with the cloud system by the wireless router. The basic images
The scanned images are formulated in the STL format file and will be accessible for chair side observation in 2 min of intraoral
can be stored as long as a decade. These digital images can be uti- scanning and then it is sent to Align technology via Internet, where
lised in the convention lingual system and smile designing [9]. Bet- they are converted and accessible for downloading at doctor’s site
ter treatment objective formulation and effective outcomes as stereolithography (STL) file within 48 h. Initially in orthodontic
improve the patient compliance towards the treatment. practice, these mechanics were utilized to construct digital models
and later to generate a fundamental structure for indirect bonding.
3.4. Plan scan H In some practices, the use of conventional PVS impressions has
been replaced by intraoral scanning and is precisely used in
The Planmeca, Plan CAD and Plan Mill are the three varied ver- orthognathic cases, for the production of surgical splints by utiliz-
sions of the USA based scanning system that entered the commer- ing digital STL files. Digital scanning can be sucessfully utilized in
cial world in 2014 (Fig. 9). Coupled with ED4 Technologies this diagnosis and treatment planning. Linear measurements such as
scanner can be used based on a blue laser technique to captures mesiodistal width, buccolingual height, and vertical height of the
the digital image in no time and reconstruct the same data at a teeth can also be measured with iTero scanner. By utilizing digital
later time point if needed. The most unique quality of this scanner intraoral scanning precise measurement of elementary diagnostic
lies in its ability to be directly connected to a computer screen with measurements like overbite, overjet, arch width, arch length, tooth
a USB connector. Varied size tips are available with the scanner to size and Bolton’s ratio is possible [24]. Peer assessment rating
reach to the distal limits of the posterior teeth. These tips can be (PAR) score can also be measured by utilizing digitally scanned
easily autoclaved to maintain hygiene with every patient. The models and this computerized-based method.
device does not require any calibration to bring precise and effi-
cient scans [20].
The Planmeca RomeaxisH cloud easily stores scanned images in 5. Discussion and future direction
the file format of open STL. The commercial available software
available for use along with this scanner is popularly known as Digitization has entered in all facets of dentistry. In conven-
Planmeca RomexisH 3D Ortho Studio. It comes in two commer- tional orthodontic practice, impression making and pouring and
cially available version namely basic and the advanced. Treatment finishing dental cast not only proved tedious process but lacked
planning and execution can be carried out in the basic version or the ability to be reproduced in the absence of the patient. On the
mode [21]. Whereas segmentation, virtual model set ups and stim- contrary, modern day orthodontic dental treatment makes smart
ulating treatment outcomes can be successfully performed with use of imaging technologies in the form of digital intra oral and
the advanced mode. extra oral scanners to record impressions of the upper and lower
The light weight wand makes it easy to use. The total weight of dentition and fabricate accurate and precise cast models to per-
the scanner is less than 11.3 kg. The monitor screen can be raised form model analysis for calculating arch length tooth material dis-
and lowered as per the needs of the operator [22]. This scanner crepancy. Measurements made from digital models produced by
coupled with the latest ortho studio software has helped the commercially available scanners such as Ortho Insight 3D, I Tero,
orthodontist tremendously to improve the treatment results and and Lythos were highly reliable. Different scanners utilise the var-
achieve desirable goals. ied scanning technology to construct high quality images that can
be segmented and reconstructed on demand. The most reliable
technique having greater clinical implication in dentistry particu-
larly orthodontics is parallel confocal technique.
The potential of a scanner to give vital information on patient’s
occlusion and dental relation may be a basis to order them as per
clinician’s clinical needs and requirements. Pre treatment patient
records mainly the negative replica in form of impression and pos-
itive replica as cast models are essential pre requisite for accurate
diagnosis and efficient treatment planning. The normal anatomy of
the peri oral structures is also highlighted with these digital scans
[25]. Since the plaster and stone dental study models cannot be
retrieved and transferred in patient’s absence, scanned models
have added advantages of versatility coupled with durability
[26]. Record keeping has highly improved with the computerised
dental mock and study models. Digital photographs both extra oral
and intra oral, radiographs such as lateral cephalogram and OPG
along with scanned dental cast has revolutionised the diagnostic
envelope and opened new horizon for advanced treatment to a
specific form of malocclusion. This data can be shared amongst
three or more orthodontist at the same time with the innovation
Fig. 8. LYTHOSTM scanner [19]. of tele-dentistry [27].
191
S. Sehrawat, A. Kumar, S. Grover et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 56 (2022) 186–193
On comparing standard alginate impression with TRIOSH intra mance and quality of commonly used scanners by monitoring
oral scanning, the 3D models obtained gave accurate results and the appropriate input parameters [33]. The speciality of orthodon-
desirable tooth movement can be tried with precision [28]. 3D tics and dentofacial has been benefitted many folds with the
scanning of upper and lower arch is a predisposing step to advance advent of this latest technology. With the pandemic of COVID 19,
to additive manufacturing to fabricate orthodontic appliances and that has shaken the entire world. Physical appearances of the
retainers. An accurate scan of the entire arch is a perfect replica of patients to the dental set up has also become limited. But delayed
the patient’s intra oral environment [29]. The digital scanners have treatments and inability to adequately address the patient’s pain
definitely brought about a paradigm shift from conventional to and discomfort has reduced the overall quality of oral health care.
digital orthodontic practice encompassing the scanning of the In such harsh and difficult situations, digitization has helped
maxillary and mandibular arches to replicate into 3D digital cast tremendously. Telephonic consultancies and orthodontic appliance
models and finally to 3D printing and its implication in formulating and retainer fabrication from digital cast models and scanned
of appliances and craniofacial scaffolds. Incremental sheet forming impressions of the patient has supported the dentist in providing
helps in sequential layering to fabricate these scaffolds [30]. Single uninterrupted and continuous treatment modalities. It is certainly
point incremental forming (SPIF) process is an innovative tech- a boon for the mankind. Other specialities of medical and dental
nique to fabricate useful shapes to mimic craniofacial structure health care have been empowered to provide absolute treatment
economically [31]. The future of dentistry encompassing the digital needs, by offering reduced number of appointments and shortened
scanning technology is bright and progressive. It eliminates the chair side time resulting in better patient compliance. Digital
limitation of conventional dental practice with reduced chair side records offer added advantage of efficient storage, ease of repro-
time and probability of clinician’s technical errors [32]. The ANN duction and better communication between dentist to patient
(Artificial neural networks) model can be applied assess perfor- and one dentist to another dentist. Hence, digitization in health-
192
S. Sehrawat, A. Kumar, S. Grover et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 56 (2022) 186–193
care in general and dentistry in particular has proved to be a pow- [7] M.K. Kakkar, J. Singla, N. Garg, G. Gupta, P. Srivastava, A. Kumar, Class schedule
generation using evolutionary algorithms, in: Journal of Physics: Conference
erful tool for the benefit of humanity.
Series 2021 Aug 1, vol. 1950(1), IOP Publishing, pp. 012067.
[8] J.A. Bosio, F. Rozhitsky, S.S. Jiang, M. Conte, P. Mukherjee, T.J. Cangialosi,
Comparison of scanning times for different dental cast materials using an
6. Conclusion intraoral scanner, J. World Fed. Orthod. 6 (1) (2017) 11–14.
[9] R. Richert, A. Goujat, L. Venet, G. Viguie, S. Viennot, P. Robinson, J.-C. Farges, M.
Digitization has influenced all facets of dentistry. Digital scan- Fages, M. Ducret, Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful
impression, J. Healthc Eng. 2017 (2017) 1–9.
ning technology has revolutionized the conventional imaging [10] G. Lecocq, Digital impression-taking: fundamentals and benefits in
modalities entirely. With digital extra and intra oral scanners the orthodontics, Int. Orthod. 14 (2) (2016) 184–194.
procedure of impression making and cast fabrication has impro- [11] O. Zilberman, J. Huggare, K. Parikakis, Evaluation of the validity of tooth size
and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional
vised many folds. virtual orthodontic models, Angle Orthod. 73 (2003) 301–306.
[12] H.B. Jacob, G.D. Wyatt, P.H. Buschang, Reliability and validity of intraoral and
These scanners are highly efficient, easy to install and use. extraoral scanners, Prog. Orthod. 16 (2015) 38.
[13] C.B. Martin, E.V. Chalmers, G.T. McIntyre, H. Cochrane, P.A. Mossey,
Digital cast presents accurate and precise recording of measure-
Orthodontic scanners: what’s available?, J Orthod. 42 (2) (2015) 136–143.
ments like overjet, overbite and model analysis contributing to [14] T. Grünheid, S.D. McCarthy, B.E. Larson, Clinical use of a direct chairside oral
efficient diagnosis and treatment planning. scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance, Am. J.
Model analysis such as Bolton analysis can be performed with Orthodon. Dentof. Orthoped. 146 (5) (2014) 673–682.
[15] I. Faus-Matoses, A. Mora, C. Bellot-Arcís, J.L. Gandia-Franco, V. Paredes-
greater efficiency depicting the tooth material arch length dis- Gallardo, A Comparative Study of the Validity and Reproducibility of
crepancy responsible for development of a malocclusion that Mesiodistal Tooth Size and Dental Arch with iTeroTM Intraoral Scanner and
may progress to temporomandibular joint dysfunction. the Traditional Method. Dental Anatomy, 2018 Aug 1:157.
[16] P. Müller, A. Ender, T. Joda, J. Katsoulis, Impact of digital intraoral scan
Digital smile designing using scanners and softwares has strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner, Quint. Int.
improved the patient compliant towards treatment. 7 (4) (2016).
Useful in fabrication of patient specific surgical guides and tem- [17] B.E. Cozad, Chair-side intraoral scanners to replace conventional dental
impressions/Diagnostic Accuracy of Impression Free Digital Models (Doctoral
plates for accurate placement of implants. dissertation, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston).
Any number of impressions can be reproduced with digital [18] A.M. Cuperus, M.C. Harms, F.A. Rangel, E.M. Bronkhorst, J.G. Schols, K.H.
records saving chair side time and appointment visits for the Breuning, Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study,
Am. J. Orthodon. Dentofac. Orthoped. 142 (3) (2012) 308–313.
patient and the clinician. [19] S.u. Ting-shu, S. Jian, Intraoral digital impression technique: a review, J.
The advent of digitization with digital imaging technologies has Prosthodont. 24 (4) (2015) 313–321.
opened new doors for improvement of conventional dental and [20] A. Ender, T. Attin, A. Mehl, In vivo precision of conventional and digital
methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions, J. Prosthet. Dent. 115
health care services.
(3) (2016) 313–320.
[21] W. Renne, M. Ludlow, J. Fryml, Z. Schurch, A. Mennito, R. Kessler, A. Lauer,
Other specialized branches of dentistry have been benefitted Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on
from this technology enormously, especially pediatric dentistry 3-dimensional comparisons, J. Prosth. Dent. 118 (1) (2017) 36–42.
[22] T.V. Flügge, S. Schlager, K. Nelson, S. Nahles, M.C. Metzger, Precision of
as impression making is relatively tough with children and young intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with
adults as they are non compliant same is in department of the iTero and a model scanner, Am. J. Orthodont. Dentofac. Orthoped. 144 (3)
prosthodontics as geriatric patients prefer less chair side time (2013) 471–478.
[23] S. Akyalcin, B.E. Cozad, J.D. English, C.D. Colville, S. Laman, Diagnostic accuracy
and relatively less appointment. The future of orthodontic dental of impression-free digital models, Am. J. Orthodont. Dentofac. Orthoped. 144
practice in conjugation of digital scanning technology is bright (6) (2013) 916–922.
and progressive [24] J. Abduo, M. Elseyoufi, Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of
influencing factors, Euro. J. Prosthod. Restor. Dent. 26 (3) (2018) 101–121.
[25] J.-H. Lim, J.-M. Park, M. Kim, S.-J. Heo, J.-Y. Myung, Comparison of digital
Declaration of Competing Interest intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive
experience, J. Prosthet. Dent. 119 (2) (2018) 225–232.
[26] J.W. Anh, J.M. Park, Y.S. Chun, M. Kim, M. Kim, A comparison of the precision of
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan- three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared tooth irregularity and scanning direction, Korean J. Orthodont. 46 (1) (2016)
3–12.
to influence the work reported in this paper.
[27] O. Al-Jubuori, A. Azari, An introduction to dental digitizers in dentistry. A
systematic review, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 7 (2015) 10–20.
[28] H. Khraishi, B. Duane, Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical
References
conditions for obtaining full-arch digital impressions is insufficient, Evid.-
based Dent. 18 (1) (2017) 24–25.
[1] G. Torassian, C.H. Kau, J.D. English, J. Powers, H.I. Bussa, A. Marie Salas-Lopez, J. [29] P. Medina-Sotomayor, A. Pascual-Moscardo, I. Camps, Relationship between
A. Corbett, Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch
substitute materials, Angle Orthodont. 80 (4) (2010) 662–669. impressions, J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 10 (4) (2018) e361.
[2] W.E. Harrell, 3D Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics, Semin. [30] A. Kumar, V. Gulati, P. Kumar, H. Singh, Forming force in incremental sheet
Orthod. 15 (1) (2009) 35–41. forming: a comparative analysis of the state of the art, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci.
[3] N.D. Kravitz, C.H. Groth, P.E. Jones, J.W. Graham, W.R. Redmond, Intraoral Eng. 41 (6) (2019) 1–45.
digital scanners, J. Clin. Orthod. 48 (6) (2014) 337–347. [31] A. Kumar, V. Gulati, Optimization and investigation of process parameters in
[4] S. Sehrawat, A. Kumar, M. Prabhakar, J. Nindra, The expanding domains of 3D single point incremental forming, Ind. J. Eng. Mater. Sci. (IJEMS). 27 (2) (2021)
printing pertaining to the speciality of orthodontics, Mater. Today: Proc. 50 (5) 246–255.
(2022) 1611–1618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.124. [32] LiJun Sun, J.-S. Lee, H.-H. Choo, H.-S. Hwang, K.-M. Lee, Reproducibility of an
[5] V.K. Shrivastava, A. Kumar, A. Shrivastava, A. Tiwari, K. Thiru, R. Batra, Study intraoral scanner: a comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans, Am. J.
and trend prediction of Covid-19 cases in india using deep learning techniques, Orthod. Dentofac. Orthoped. 154 (2) (2018) 305–310.
in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2021 Aug 1, vol. 1950(1), IOP [33] A. Kumar, D. Kumar, P. Kumar, V. Dhawan, Optimization of incremental sheet
Publishing, pp. 012084. forming process using artificial intelligence-based techniques, in: InNature-
[6] M. Pundir, J.K. Sandhu, A. Kumar, Quality-of-service prediction techniques for Inspired Optimization in Advanced Manufacturing Processes and Systems
wireless sensor networks, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2021 Aug 1, 2020 Dec 8, CRC Press, pp. 113–130.
vol. 1950(1), IOP Publishing, p. 012082.
193