Transitioning From TCFD To ISSB Gap Analysis

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

ACMF-ISSB Technical Training on

Transitioning from TCFD to ISSB: Gap


Analysis

20 May 2024

The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IFRS
Foundation, International Accounting Standards Board or the International Sustainability Standards Board.
Copyright © 2024 IFRS Foundation. All rights reserved.
2

Objectives

• Why - Understand the purpose of


transitioning from TCFD to ISSB
• What – Identify the differences between
TCFD Recommendations and ISSB
Standards
• How – Develop sustainability disclosure
plan
3

Overview

1. Introduction on TCFD and ISSB

2. Comparison – IFRS S2 and TCFD Recommendations

3. Get started with the transition


4

‘Culmination’ of TCFD work


ISSB Standards mark “the culmination of the work of the Task Force on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures”

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 incorporate the recommendations of the TCFD (mapping


available at ifrs.org)

Provided yet further clarification of ‘alphabet soup’

Companies and jurisdictions still able to use TCFD Recommendations

Financial Stability Board transferred TCFD monitoring responsibilities to ISSB


5

ISSB Standards apply TCFD structure to set out core content


areas

Governance Strategy Risk management Metrics and targets


Governance processes, A company’s strategy for The process A company's performance
controls and managing sustainability- a company uses in relation to sustainability-
procedures a company related risks and to identify, related risks
uses to monitor, manage opportunities assess, prioritise and and opportunities
and oversee monitor sustainability-
sustainability-related related risks and
risks and opportunities opportunities
6

TCFD Recommendations
Governance Strategy Risk Management Metrics and Targets
Disclose the organisation’s Disclose the actual and potential Disclose how the organisation Disclose the metrics and targets used
governance around impacts of climate-related risks and identifies, assesses, and to assess and manage relevant
climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s manages climate-related risks. climate-related risks and opportunities
opportunities. businesses, strategy, and financial where such information is material.
planning where such information is
material.
a) Describe the board’s a) Describe the climate-related risks a) Describe the organisation’s a) Disclose the metrics used by the
oversight of climate-related and opportunities the organisation has processes for identifying and organisation to assess climate-related
risks and opportunities. identified over the short, medium, and assessing climate-related risks. risks and opportunities in line with its
long term. strategy and risk management process.

b) Describe management’s b) Describe the impact of climate- b) Describe the organisation’s b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if
role in assessing and related risks and opportunities on the processes for managing appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas
managing risks and organisation’s businesses, strategy, climate-related risks. (GHG) emissions, and the related risks.
opportunities. and financial planning.
c) Describe the resilience of the c) Describe how processes for c) Describe the targets used by the
organisation’s strategy, taking into identifying, assessing, and organisation to manage climate-related
consideration different climate-related managing climate-related risks risks and opportunities and
scenarios, including a 2°C or lower are integrated into the performance against targets.
scenario. organisation’s overall risk
management.
7

Comparison: IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures


with the TCFD Recommendations
Differences take three forms. Specifically, IFRS S2:

• uses different wording to capture the same


information as the TCFD recommendations

• requires more detailed information that is in line


with the TCFD recommendations

• differs from the TCFD guidance-mainly by


providing some additional requirements and
guidance.

ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/supporting-implementation/ifrs-s2/ifrs-s2-comparison-tcfd-july2023.pdf
8

IFRS S2 based on TCFD recommendations


TCFD core elements IFRS S2 summary comparison

Governance Broadly consistent

• Requires that a company consider and refer to its Industry-


based Guidance
Broadly
Strategy • Requires additional information regarding resiliency
consistent
• Does not specify which climate-related scenarios to use
• Provides additional application guidance and reliefs

Broadly • Explicitly requires additional disclosures on the processes used


Risk management
consistent to identify, assess, prioritise and monitor opportunities
• Requires disclosure of industry-based metrics
Broadly • Requires additional disclosures related to a company’s GHG
Metrics and targets
consistent emissions and planned use of carbon credits
• Provides additional application guidance and reliefs
9

ISSB Standards recognise


the value of industry-
specific disclosures
• IFRS S1 requires companies to refer to
and consider the applicability of the
industry SASB Standards for topics
beyond climate to identify sustainability
risks or opportunities and disclosures
• IFRS S2 requires industry-specific climate-
related disclosures and provides
illustrative guidance derived from SASB
Standards to support that.
10

Get Started
Read and Explore:
IFRS S1 and IFRS S2

Use:
the IFRS S2–TCFD comparison table

Take Action:
to fill any gaps identified between your current climate-
related disclosures and IFRS S2’s requirements
Assess:
Compliance with IFRS S1 and IFRS S2?
Change the timing of disclosures?
11

Annex: Comparision table


12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Visit ifrs.org to find out more
• Access the Standards and supporting materials
• Listen to the monthly podcast
• Respond to live consultations
• Sign up for news alerts
• Learn about digital financial reporting resources
• Observe ISSB meetings
• Join the team

You might also like