Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

ISSN: 1471-2598 (Print) 1744-7682 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/iebt20

Clinical and histopathological characterization of


eczematous eruptions occurring in course of anti
IL-17 treatment: a case series and review of the
literature

G. Caldarola, F. Pirro, A. Di Stefani, M. Talamonti, M. Galluzzo, S. D’Adamio,


M. Magnano, N. Bernardini, P. Malagoli, F. Bardazzi, C. Potenza, L. Bianchi, K.
Peris & C. De Simone

To cite this article: G. Caldarola, F. Pirro, A. Di Stefani, M. Talamonti, M. Galluzzo, S. D’Adamio,


M. Magnano, N. Bernardini, P. Malagoli, F. Bardazzi, C. Potenza, L. Bianchi, K. Peris & C. De
Simone (2020) Clinical and histopathological characterization of eczematous eruptions
occurring in course of anti IL-17 treatment: a case series and review of the literature, Expert
Opinion on Biological Therapy, 20:6, 665-672, DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1727439

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2020.1727439

Published online: 17 Feb 2020.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 1325

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Citing articles: 32 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iebt20
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
2020, VOL. 20, NO. 6, 665–672
https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2020.1727439

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Clinical and histopathological characterization of eczematous eruptions occurring in


course of anti IL-17 treatment: a case series and review of the literature
G. Caldarolaa,b, F. Pirro a,b, A. Di Stefania,b, M. Talamonti c, M. Galluzzo c, S. D’Adamioc, M. Magnanod,
N. Bernardinie, P. Malagolif, F. Bardazzid, C. Potenzae, L. Bianchic, K. Perisa,b and C. De Simonea,b
a
Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; bDepartment of Dermatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario
A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; cDermatology Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; dDivision of Dermatology, Department of
Specialized, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; eDermatology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo
Pontino, Terracina, Italy; fDermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy

ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY


Background: Real-life data often highlight the side effects of certain drugs not previously reported in Received 1 September 2019
randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Accepted 5 February 2020
Objective: To describe cutaneous inflammatory eruptions in psoriatic patients treated with an anti IL- KEYWORDS
17A agent (secukinumab or ixekizumab). Psoriasis; IL17; secukinumab;
Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who started an ixekizumab; anti IL17; side
anti IL-17A agent between September 2016-February 2019 and who developed cutaneous inflamma- effects; eczematous
tory eruptions during treatment. A systematic review of similar events reported in the literature was reactions
performed.
Results: Data of 468 patients were reviewed and 27 cutaneous inflammatory eruptions of 27 (5.8%)
patients were collected. The eruptions appeared after a mean of 16.9 ± 17.0 weeks of therapy showing
a classical acute eczema in 11 patients (40.7%), an atopic dermatitis-like rash in 11 patients (40.7%) and
a psoriasiform eruption in 5 patients (18.5%). Histopathology of 12/27 cases showed epidermal
spongiosis in all these variants.
Conclusion: We described the clinic-pathologic features of some eczematous eruptions occurring in
psoriatic patients, 3–4 months after treatment initiation with an anti IL-17A agent. Further investiga-
tions are needed to explain this phenomenon, that might be defined a paradoxical adverse event,
based upon the role of IL17 in eczema pathogenesis.

1. Introduction alpha agents and ustekinumab, the most frequent adverse


events reported during anti IL-17A therapies are nasopharyn-
Interleukin 17 (IL17) family includes several molecules (IL-17A,
gitis, headache, upper respiratory tract infections, and injec-
IL-17B, IL-17C, IL-17D, IL-17E, and IL-17F) among which IL17A
tion site reactions [4–6]. On the other hand, Candida infections
plays a key role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis [1]. This
seem to be a typical side effect of anti IL-17A therapies, due to
cytokine is produced mainly by T helper 17 (Th-17) lympho-
the pivotal role of IL-17 in the defense against fungal patho-
cytes in response to their stimulation with IL-23 and it has
gens [7]. However, Candida infections occur in a low percen-
a range of effects on different cellular targets in the skin,
tage of cases and do not usually represent a cause of drug
leading mainly to neutrophilic chemotaxis and angiogenesis
withdrawal [7].
[1]. Moreover, IL-17A is critical for the induction of synovial
In the last two years, with the use of anti IL-17A antibodies
inflammation and pathological bone resorption typical of
in the clinical daily practice, several data have been accumu-
psoriatic arthritis through direct activation of osteoclast pre-
lated regarding treatment efficacy in patients who have dif-
cursors [2]. Based on these findings, several new biologic
ferent disease severity, concomitant diseases, previous
agents for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic
experience of biological therapy. While confirming their effi-
arthritis, which target IL-17, have been developed. The three
cacy in psoriasis, on the other hand, the use of anti IL-17A
approved IL-17 inhibitors are secukinumab and ixekizumab,
agents in wide populations allows to identify some cutaneous
both IL-17A inhibitors, and brodalumab, a human monoclonal
side effects not previously reported in pivotal clinical trials.
antibody which targets the IL-17-receptor A (IL-17RA) on ker-
Aim of this study is to describe cutaneous inflammatory
atinocytes and immune cells [3].
eruptions in patients with plaque psoriasis and/or psoriatic
The efficacy and tolerability of these drugs have been
arthritis treated with an anti IL-17A agent (secukinumab or
investigated in several randomized controlled trials, showing
ixekizumab) and to review similar reactions reported in the
optimal clinical results and an acceptable safety profile [3]. In
literature.
line with the first available biological therapies, i.e. anti TNF

CONTACT G. Caldarola giacomocaldarola@libero.it Istituto Di Dermatologia, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, L.go F. Vito 1 00135 Roma
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
666 G. CALDAROLA ET AL.

2. Methods during the course of treatment with anti IL-17A agents and
reported in the literature. A comprehensive update-search was
2.1. Retrospective data collection
carried out in PubMed to cover literature to 28 April 2019.
A retrospective analysis was performed in a cohort of patients with Keywords ‘psoriasis,’ ‘psoriatic arthritis,’ ‘ixekizumab,’ ‘secukinu-
chronic plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, who mab,’ ‘side effects,’ ‘cutaneous,’ ‘eczematous,’ and ‘eczema’ were
initiated treatment with secukinumab or ixekizumab during the used. Search results were restricted to articles written in English.
period September 2016–February 2019. The study population Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for addi-
consisted of patients attending the outpatient clinics of five parti- tional studies of interest. Case reports and case series were
cipating dermatologic centers (Università Cattolica, Rome, screened and selected independently by two reviewers (G.C. and
University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata,’ University of Bologna, F.P.). Poster abstracts, oral communications, and meeting summa-
University La Sapienza, Polo Pontino, Terracina, and Azienda ries were excluded. Data extraction was performed and the rele-
Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan) who developed cuta- vant data were reported into a table.
neous inflammatory eruptions during treatment with an anti IL-
17A agent, particularly ixekizumab and secukinumab. Patients
treated with brodalumab were ruled out from this analysis,
3. Results
because this drug has been just approved in Italy. These events 3.1. Patients’ clinical characteristics
were considered related to the anti psoriatic treatment according
Clinical data of 468 patients treated with an anti IL-17A antibody
to two major criteria: a) a Naranjo score [8] ≥4 and b) an agree-
(325 with secukinumab and 143 with ixekizumab) were reviewed
ment of at least 2 out of 3 dermatologists (G.C., F.P., C.D.S.),
and 27 cutaneous inflammatory eruptions of 27 (5.8%) patients
evaluating the medical history and the clinical pictures of the
were collected (Tables 1 and 2). The 27 patients, 18 (66.7%)
reported cases.
males and 9 (33.3%) females, were of Caucasian ethnicity. At
For each patient, demographic and clinical data (age, sex,
the time of anti IL-17A treatment initiation, 20 of 27 (74%)
ethnicity, height, weight, body mass index [BMI], disease sever-
patients have had previous treatment with biologics and, in
ity, duration and age of onset of psoriasis, comorbidities, and
particular, 5 patients had been treated with another anti IL-17A
previous systemic therapies) at time of starting the anti IL-17A
agent without any cutaneous side effect. Only 6 (22.2%) patients
therapy were collected. In particular, data on concomitant and
had a personal history of atopy, 11 (40.7%) had a familiar history
personal or family history of atopic diseases were also collected.
of atopy and 13 (48.1%) patients had neither of them.
Based upon the eruptions previously reported during treatment
with anti TNF alfa, the skin inflammatory reactions occurring
during treatment with secukinumab or ixekizumab were classi- 3.2. Clinical characteristics of the skin eruptions
fied according to the clinical features of the lesions: 1) liche-
noid, 2) eczematous (diffuse erythematous crusted and The cutaneous eruptions appeared after a mean of 16.9 ±
excoriated papules isolated and/or merging in plaques), 3) ato- 17.0 weeks of therapy. Seventeen (63.0%) skin manifestations
pic dermatitis-like (in the classical form, with lichenified and were observed during treatment with secukinumab and 10
excoriated plaques, mainly at flexures areas, head and neck), 4) (37.0%) during treatment with ixekizumab. Clinical features
urticarial, 5) psoriasiform, and 6) others. The presence of asso- were consistent with a classical acute eczematous rash in 11
ciated symptoms (itching and pain), time of onset, and involved patients (40.7%) (Figure 1a), an atopic dermatitis-like rash
body site were also collected. Levels of circulating eosinophils (Figure 2a) in 11 patients (40.7%) and a psoriasiform eruption
and serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) were recorded when avail- in 5 patients (18.5%) (Figure 3a). No lichenoid or urticarial
able and above the normal range. The management of the skin lesions were reported. Twenty patients (74.1%) reported that
reaction (local or systemic therapy, and anti IL-17A agent with- lesions were associated with itch (mean itch score on
drawal) was also recorded. Missing data were retrieved from a numerical rating scale: 6/10), 6 patients (22.2%) reported
charts or directly from the patients through phone calls. Only burning sensations and 1 patient (3.7%) had no symptoms.
cases with completed data were collected for the present study. The involvement of different body site is reported in Figure 4:
In order to describe histopathological characteristics of the skin the skin eruption affected mainly the trunk and the flexural
eruptions, a revision of a lesional skin sample, when available, areas in 17 (63.0%) and 12 (44.4%) patients, respectively. At
was performed by a board-certified dermopathologist (A.D.S.), the time of the eruption, 8 of 11 patients showed high serum
blinded for the clinical characteristics of cutaneous lesions. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels with a mean value of 313 UI/ml
Microscopic evaluation of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections (normal range: 0–200 UI/ml) while only 1 of 27 patients (3,7%)
was performed according to established criteria described else- showed blood hypereosinophilia with a total eosinophil count
where [9,10]. of 1,2 x 10^9/l. No significant differences were found in the
The study was conducted following the principles of the
Declaration of Helsinki. Table 1. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics.
Mean age at the time of the eruption (years), mean ± SD 51.0 ± 11.9
Mean BMI (Kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.3 ± 3.8
Mean age at diagnosis (years) of psoriasis, mean ± SD 29.0 ± 16.0
2.2. Literature review Mean duration of disease (years), mean ± SD 21.2 ± 12.8
Concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA), n/tot of pts (%) 6/27 (22.2)
A systematic review was performed to investigate the clinical Previous biological therapy, n/tot of pts (%) 20/27 (74)
characteristics of cutaneous inflammatory eruptions occurring Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.
Table 2. Patient and skin eruption characteristics.
Personal and/or Discontinuation of
Age familial Anti IL-17A Duration of therapy Associated treatment
Pt# Sex (yrs) history of atopy agent (weeks) Localization Clinical aspects symptoms (management) Management
1 F 60 No Secukinumab 12 Extensor areas, trunk, folds Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Systemic steroids
2 M 50 Yes Secukinumab 9 Trunk Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Systemic CsA
3 M 20 Yes Secukinumab 9 Trunk Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Systemic CsA
4 M 41 No Secukinumab 52 Extensor areas Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Topical steroids
5 M 54 No Secukinumab 76 Extensor areas Eczematous eruption Burning sensation Yes Topical steroids
6 F 74 No Ixekizumab 6 Flexural areas, palmo-plantar Atopic dermatitis-like Burning sensation Yes Systemic steroids
7 F 55 Yes Secukinumab 4 Extensor areas, trunk Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Systemic steroids
8 M 64 No Secukinumab 24 Extensor areas Eczematous eruption Burning sensation Yes Topical steroids
9 F 58 No Secukinumab 16 Trunk, folds Eczematous eruption Itch No Topical steroids
10 M 49 Yes Secukinumab 4 Flexural areas, face, trunk Atopic dermatitis-like Itch No Topical steroids
11 F 28 Yes Secukinumab 6 Flexural, extensor areas, trunk, folds Eczematous eruption Itch No Topical steroids
12 M 55 No Secukinumab 5 Flexural, extensor areas, face, trunk, folds, Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Topical steroids
palmo-plantar
13 M 63 No Secukinumab 2 Flexural areas, face, trunk, folds Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Topical steroids
14 M 47 No Ixekizumab 10 Flexural areas, trunk Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Systemic steroids
15 M 41 Yes Ixekizumab 8 Extensor areas Eczematous eruption Itch Yes Topical steroids
16 M 53 No Ixekizumab 20 Face, trunk Psoriasiform eruption Itch Yes Topical steroids
17 M 34 No Ixekizumab 8 Extensor areas, trunk Psoriasiform eruption None No Topical steroids
18 M 46 No Ixekizumab 4 Flexural areas, trunk, folds Atopic dermatitis-like Itch No Systemic steroids
19 M 52 No Secukinumab 16 Extensor areas, trunk Psoriasiform eruption Burning sensation Yes Topical steroids
20 F 61 Yes Ixekizumab 4 Eyelids Atopic dermatitis-like Burning sensation No Topical steroids
21 F 47 Yes Ixekizumab 16 Flexural areas, trunk Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Topical steroids
22 M 68 Yes Secukinumab 20 Flexural areas, folds Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Systemic steroids
23 M 59 Yes Secukinumab 16 Flexural areas Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Systemic steroids
24 M 48 Yes Ixekizumab 12 Extensor areas Psoriasiform eruption Burning sensation No Topical steroids
25 F 42 Yes Ixekizumab 26 Extensor areas, trunk Psoriasiform eruption Itch No Topical steroids
26 F 54 No Secukinumab 40 Flexural areas, eyelids, trunk, folds Atopic dermatitis-like Itch Yes Topical steroids
27 M 43 No Secukinumab 32 Flexural areas, trunk Atopic dermatitis-like Itch No Topical steroids
Abbreviations: CsA, cyclosporine.
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
667
668 G. CALDAROLA ET AL.

Figure 1. a. Patient presenting a classical eczematous eruption during treatment with ixekizumab with erythematous crusted and excoriated plaques on the trunk.
b. Histopathology showing full thickness epidermal spongiosis with lymphocytic exocytosis (arrow), spongiotic vesicles (arrowhead), and intracorneal serum crusts
(asterisk) [Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification B: x100, insert: x400].

Figure 2. a. Patient presenting an atopic dermatitis-like eruption during treatment with secukinumab with intensely erythematous flexural plaques.
b. Histopathology exhibiting irregular acanthosis with minimal spongiosis and eosinophils in the dermis (arrow) [Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification
B: x100, insert: x400].

Figure 3. a. Patient presenting a psoriasiform eczema-like eruption during treatment with ixekizumab with erythematous hyperkeratotic excoriated plaque on the
elbows. b. Histopathology demostrating psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with mild spongiosis, parakeratosis (arrow), loss of granular layer (arrowhead) and
Munro intracorneal microabscesses (asterisk) [Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification B: x100, insert: x400].
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY 669

Figure 4. Localization of observed cutaneous reactions.

characteristics of the eruptions induced by secukinumab and in stratum corneum, edema of papillary dermis with tortuous
ixekizumab (data not reported). and dilated capillary (Figure 3B): these findings were consistent
with a psoriasiform eczema and were clinically classified as
psoriasiform eruption.
3.3. Histopathological characteristics of the skin
eruptions
3.4. Management of the skin eruptions
In our case series, 12/27 cases (in Table 2, patients nr 4, 5, 6, 7,
12, 14, 15,18, 21, 23, 25, 26) were histopathologically verified In 18 of 27 (66.7%) patients' treatment with the anti IL-17A
and tissue samples were retrieved for revision. All reviewed inhibitor was suspended and a local (10 patients) or sys-
cases exhibited the presence of epidermal spongiosis. In 4 out temic (6 patients) therapy with corticosteroids or cyclospor-
of 12 cases, microscopic evaluation showed the prevalence of ine (2 patients) was started. In the remaining 9 (33.3%)
full thickness spongiosis with spongiotic vesicles, multiple foci patients, the anti IL-17A agent was continued and topical
of parakeratosis with fibrinous exudate, lymphocytic exocytosis (8 patients) or systemic (1 patient) steroids were used to
in the epidermis (Figure 1b): these features were consistent manage the skin reaction.
with acute spongiotic dermatitis and were correlated with
a clinical diagnosis of acute eczematous reaction. In 5 of 12
3.5. Literature review
cases, histopathological revision disclosed the presence of irre-
gular acanthosis with minimal spongiosis and focal parakerato- In literature, four articles have already reported inflammatory skin
sis, consistent with atopic dermatitis (Figure 2b): those cases eruptions occurring during treatment with anti IL-17 agents (see
were clinically classified as atopic dermatitis-like eruption. In 3 Table 3). In particular, Burlando M [11] and Munera-Campos M [12]
of 12, histopathological evaluation disclosed regular epidermal reported two single cases, while Teraki Y [13] and Napolitano
hyperplasia with papillomatosis, mild spongiosis, loss of gran- M [14] reported a case series of 3 and 4 patients, respectively.
ular layer, parakeratosis with Munro microabscesses and serum The mean age of patients was 49.4 ± 21.7 years and 5 (55.6%)

Table 3. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the cases reported in the literature.
Age Atopic history Anti IL-17A Treatment duration Discontinuation of
Reference Sex (yrs) (Y/N) agent (weeks) Localization Clinical aspects treatment
[11] F 70 No Secukinumab 24 Eyelids, lips, nostrils Atopic dermatitis-like Yes
[12] M 31 No Ixekizumab 56 Hands, trunk Eczematous eruption No
[13] F 33 No Secukinumab 12 Eyelids Blepharitis Yes
M 52 No Secukinumab 16 Eyelids Blepharitis No
M 89 No Ixekizumab 16 Eyelids Blepharitis No
[14] F 32 Yes Ixekizumab 10 Face, upper and lower Eczematous eruption Yes
extremities, trunk
M 62 No Secukinumab 16 Upper and lower extremities, Eczematous eruption Yes
trunk
M 53 Yes Secukinumab 12 Back, trunk, upper arms, neck Eczematous eruption Yes
F 23 Yes Secukinumab 16 Flexural areas, lips, neck, Atopic dermatitis-like No
extremities, trunk
670 G. CALDAROLA ET AL.

patients were males. The cutaneous eruptions appeared after could be due to the low frequency of these events or to
a mean of 19.8 ± 14.1 weeks of therapy and were observed during a different patient population compared to that included in RCTs.
treatment with secukinumab or ixekizumab in 6 (66.7%) and 3 Eczematous eruptions were not reported in any pivotal
(33.3%) respectively. In 4 of 9 patients (44.4%), the skin eruptions ixekizumab or secukinumab RCTs, but in a single study con-
had a generalized eczematous appearance and in 2 cases the ducted in Japan (UNCOVER-J) [15]. This was an open-label
lesions had atopic dermatitis-like features. Finally, three patients study with the aim to evaluate the long-term efficacy and
had an exclusive palpebral involvement. Only 3 of 9 patients safety of ixekizumab, in patients with plaque psoriasis, ery-
(33.3%) had a personal history of atopy. In 5 patients (55.6%), it throdermic psoriasis, and generalized pustular psoriasis. In this
was necessary to interrupt treatment with anti the IL-17A agent. study, the most common adverse events after nasopharyngitis
was eczema, occurring in 11 of 91 (12.1%) patients. Despite
the high prevalence, no further clinical characterization of this
side effect has been reported by the authors.
4. Discussion
We believe that eczematous eruptions occurring during anti
In the present study, we report a case series of eczematous IL-17A treatment might represent paradoxical adverse events
eruptions occurring during treatment of psoriasis with an anti (PAEs). This definition is applied to pathological conditions that
IL-17A agent (secukinumab or ixekizumab) and summarized appear or worsen during therapy with biological drugs to which
similar cases reported in the literature. they usually respond (true PAEs). PAEs during biological therapy
Based upon the clinical appearance and the site involved, we also include pathological conditions in which there is a rationale
defined three possible phenotypes of this cutaneous side effect: 1) for the use of the culprit drug even if its effectiveness has not
classical acute eczema, 2) atopic dermatitis-like eruption, and 3) been demonstrated (borderline PAEs) [16]. In fact, as in psoriasis,
psoriasiform eczema. The histopathological confirmation in our IL17 seems to be involved in the pathogenesis of eczema. IL-17
cases was in line with the distinct clinical profile of each patient. In levels are significantly elevated in the skin of patients with atopic
fact, although all the eruptions showed a different degree of dermatitis compared with healthy controls and it has been
spongiosis as a common feature, the different clinical patterns hypothesized that IL-17 may mediate an immune dysregulation
presented some peculiar histopathological findings. The presence by amplifying the inflammatory response [17]. Similar results
of severe spongiosis with spongiotic vesicles and lymphocytic have also been found in allergic contact dermatitis [18–20]:
exocytosis was suggestive of an acute eczematous eruption; fea- based upon these data, anti IL-17 agents have been suggested
tures as irregular acanthosis, thickening of the epidermis with for the treatment of both these conditions [21,22].
maintained granular layer and only mild spongiosis were consis- The mechanisms underlining the onset of these eczematous
tent with an atopic dermatitis-like eruption; changes such as PAEs during anti IL-17A treatment are currently unknown. These
regular epidermal hyperplasia, parakeratosis, neutrophils in the agents may block mainly the Th1 pathway, thus inducing an
stratum corneum, and dilated papillar capillaries suggested the imbalance in the Th1/Th2 immune response and favoring the
diagnosis of psoriasiform eczema. Th2 pathway that is involved in the pathogenesis of eczema [11].
This classification seems to be applicable even to the cases On the other hand, Munera-Campos M. et al. [12] suggested that
reported in literature, even if the cases of blepharitis described an anti IL-17A agent may suppress the expression of keratino-
by Teraky et al. [13] would have needed a histopathological cyte-derived antimicrobial peptides, which could have a role at
characterization to be precisely defined in the context of the least in atopic dermatitis-like eruptions. Finally, Napolitano
patterns that we propose. Based upon the clinical character- M. et al. [14] speculated that IL-22 may be a key mediator in
istics (lichenification and fine scaling), the other concomitant the pathogenesis of eczematous PAEs.
site involved and the associated symptoms, the blepharitis In our opinion, these eczematous PAEs occurring during
presented by Burlando et al. [11] and in one of our patients treatment with secukinumab or ixekizumab may be
were classified as atopic dermatitis-like eruptions. However, in a consequence of the selective block of isoform A of IL-17.
these cases a paradoxical psoriatic involvement of eyelids may Blocking IL17A, in fact, might induce the overexpression of
not be definitely ruled out. other isoforms, such as IL-17C. In contrast to IL-17A, which is
In our case series, the skin eruptions occurred 3–4 months produced mainly by Th17 cells, the main source for IL-17C are
after treatment initiation with an anti IL-17A monoclonal anti- epithelial cells and this isoform seems to be involved both in
body and had a high impact on clinical practice since they were psoriasis and in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis [23]. In fact, IL-
often associated with itching or burning, leading to the interrup- 17C appears to trigger an autocrine loop of stimulation on
tion of the biological treatment in almost 60% of patients. keratinocytes, that may be involved in both Th17- and Th2-
Interestingly, according to our case series, some patients may driven inflammatory skin inflammation [23], and preliminary
experience these eczematous eruptions with an anti IL-17A evidence suggests that a IL-17C neutralizing antibody may be
agent but not with another one of the same class. Further successful in the management of atopic dermatitis [24].
investigations are needed to explain this phenomenon. According to this hypothesis, brodalumab, the only anti IL-17
Personal and/or family history of atopy can not help in predicting treatment that blocks not only IL-17A and IL-17F, but also IL-
who may experience these eruptions since more than half of the 17C, should not be associated with this side effect and it may
patients did not report any personal or family concomitant or be helpful in those patients who experienced this paradoxical
past atopic disease. No other risk factors have been identified. eczematous reaction with anti IL-17A agents. However, to
Real-life data often highlight side effects of certain drugs not date, no similar cases have been reported in literature but
previously reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This a wider clinical experience with this drug is needed.
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY 671

In the past years, a high number of similar cutaneous man- Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Merck-Serono, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron,
ifestations occurring during treatment with anti TNF alfa agents Roche, Sandoz, Samsung-Bioepis, Sanofi, UCB.
Participation in a company-sponsored speaker’s bureau Celgene,
have been also reported [25]. In particular, psoriasiform or pust-
Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. Another reviewer has received
ular skin manifestations and eczematous reactions as defined by research, speaking and/or consulting support from a variety of companies
histological and clinical features have been described in patients including Galderma, GSK/Stiefel, Almirall, Alvotech, Leo Pharma, BMS,
who had or had not a history of psoriasis or eczema. Even in this Boehringer Ingelheim, Mylan, Celgene, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatology,
case, the detailed interpretation of this undesirable paradoxical Abbvie, Samsung, Janssen, Lilly, Menlo, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron,
Sanofi, Novan, Qurient, National Biological Corporation, Caremark,
side effect has yet to be elucidated. In our opinion, all these
Advance Medical, Sun Pharma, Suncare Research, Informa, UpToDate
cutaneous side effects reported in course of anti TNF alfa and and National Psoriasis Foundation. They also consult for others through
anti IL-17A agents may be an expression of the spectrum of Guidepoint Global, Gerson Lehrman and other consulting organizations
disease including both atopic dermatitis both psoriasis, recently and are a founder and majority owner of www.DrScore.com. The reviewer
described by Kruger et al. [26]. In this spectrum, the different is also a part owner of company dedicated to enhancing patients’ adher-
ence to treatment. Other peer reviewers on this manuscript have no
expression of polar T-cell axes (Th1, Th2, and Th17) and derived
relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.
cytokines (IL-17, TNF alfa, IL-22, IL-5) can be variably present and
create some overlapping disease characteristics.
The major limitation of this study is the lack of a control ORCID
group including psoriatic patients not treated with anti IL-17A F. Pirro http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-9613
agents. In fact, it is already known that psoriasis and eczema M. Talamonti http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-4071
may be also spontaneously associated [27]. Moreover, to con- M. Galluzzo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-5175
firm the causative role of the biologic agents in these cases,
a re-challenge test should be needed, but this was not per-
formed. In conclusion, we described the clinic-pathologic fea- References
tures of eczematous eruptions occurring in patients with Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of
psoriasis treated with anti IL-17A monoclonal antibodies. considerable interest (••) to readers.
Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms 1. AbuHilal M, Walsh S, Shear N. The role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis
underlining the onset of such skin manifestations and to of psoriasis and update on IL-17 inhibitors for the treatment of
plaque psoriasis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:509–516.
identify patients who are at risk of developing them. In this 2. Raychaudhuri SP. Role of IL-17 in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
case series, no risk factors have been identified. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013 Apr;44(2):183–193.
3. Silfvast-Kaiser A, Paek SY, Menter A. Anti-IL17 therapies for
psoriasis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Nov 30. DOI:10.1080/
Authors' contributions 14712598.2019.1555235.
4. Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to
Conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data: G. Caldarola, ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe
F. Pirro, A. Di Stefani, K. Peris, C. De Simone. Drafting of the paper or revising it plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad
critically for intellectual content: G. Caldarola, F. Pirro, A. Di Stefani, Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73(3):400–409.
M. Talamonti, M. Galluzzo, S. D’Adamio, M. Magnano, N. Bernardini, 5. Reich K, Pinter A, Lacour JP, et al. IXORA-S investigators.
P. Malagoli, F. Bardazzi, C. Potenza, L. Bianchi, K. Peris, C. De Simone. Final Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in moderate-to-
approval of the version to be published: G. Caldarola, F. Pirro, A. Di Stefani, severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a phase III study.
M. Talamonti, M. Galluzzo, S. D’Adamio, M. Magnano, N. Bernardini, P. Malagoli, Br J Dermatol. 2017 Oct;177(4):1014–1023.
F. Bardazzi, C. Potenza, L. Bianchi, K. Peris, C. De Simone. All authors agree to be 6. Menter A, Warren RB, Langley RG, et al. Efficacy of ixekizumab
accountable for all aspects of the work. compared to etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-
severe plaque psoriasis and non-pustular palmoplantar involve-
ment: results from three phase 3 trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2
Funding and UNCOVER-3). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Oct;31
(10):1686–1692.
This paper was not funded. 7. Saunte DM, Mrowietz U, Puig L, et al. Candida infections in patients
with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with interleukin-17
inhibitors and their practical management. Br J Dermatol. 2017
Declaration of interest Jul;177(1):47–62.
8. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with 1981;30:239–245.
the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes 9. Bernard A, Ackerman MD, Almut MD, et al. Histologic diagnosis of
employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert inflammatory skin diseases: an algorithmic method based on pattern
testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. analysis. Chatham, Canada: Ardor Scribendi, 3rd ed. 2005 Jan 30.
10. Malgorzata KOLESNIK, Ingolf FRANKE, Anke LUX, et al. GOLLNICK,
eczema in psoriatico: an important differential diagnosis between
Reviewer Disclosures chronic allergic contact dermatitis and psoriasis in palmoplantar
localization. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98:50–58.
One of the reviewers on this paper has received grants/research supports 11. Burlando M, Cozzani E, Russo R, et al. Atopic-like dermatitis after secu-
or participation in clinical trials (paid to Institution) Abbvie, Almirall, kinumab injection: a case report. Dermatol Ther. 2019 Jan;32(1):e12751.
Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, • Case report with a similar reaction.
Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, UCB. 12. Munera-Campos M, Ballesca F, Richarz N, et al. Paradoxical ecze-
Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees from Abbvie, Almirall, matous reaction to ixekizumab. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.
Amgen, Baxalta, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Gebro, Janssen, 2019 Jan;33(1):e40–e42.
672 G. CALDAROLA ET AL.

• Case series with similar reactions. 20. Schmidt JD, Ahlström MG, Johansen JD, et al. Rapid allergen-
13. Teraki Y, Takahashi A, Inoue Y, et al. Eyelid dermatitis as a side induced interleukin-17 and interferonγ secretion by skin-
effect of interleukin-17A inhibitors in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. resident memory CD8+ T cells. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;
2018 Apr 16; 98(4):456–457. 76:218–227.
• Case series with similar reactions. 21. Vakharia PP, Silverberg JI. New therapies for atopic dermatitis:
14. Napolitano M, Megna M, Fabbrocini G, et al. Eczematous eruption additional treatment classes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Mar;78(3
during anti-interleukin 17 treatment of psoriasis: an emerging Suppl 1):S76–S83.
condition. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Feb 15;181(3):604-606. 22. Todberg T, Zachariae C, Krustrup D, et al. The effect of treatment
• Case series with similar reactions. with anti-interleukin-17 in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.
15. Saeki H, Nakagawa H, Nakajo K, et al. Japanese ixekizumab study group. Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Jun;78(6):431–432.
Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment for Japanese patients with 23. Chang SH, Reynolds JM, Pappu BP, et al. Interleukin-17C promotes
moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and gen- Th17 cell responses and autoimmune disease via interleukin-17
eralized pustular psoriasis: results from a 52-week, open-label, phase 3 receptor E. Immunity. 2011;35:611–621.
study (UNCOVER-J). J Dermatol. 2017 Apr;44(4):355–362. 24. Vandeghinste N, Klattig J, Jagerschmidt C, et al. Neutralization
•• Report of eczema onset during a phase 3 study with an anti- of IL-17C reduces skin inflammation in mouse models of psor-
IL17 drug. iasis and atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Jul;138
16. Toussirot É, Aubin F. Paradoxical reactions under TNF-α blocking (7):1555–1563.
agents and other biological agents given for chronic immune- •• Hypothesis on pathological role of IL-17C in the pathogenesis
mediated diseases: an analytical and comprehensive overview. of eczema.
RMD Open. 2016 Jul 15;2(2):e000239. 25. Puig L. Paradoxical reactions: anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha
17. Leonardi S, Cuppari C, Manti S, et al. Serum interleukin 17, inter- agents, Ustekinumab, Secukinumab, ixekizumab, and others. Curr
leukin 23, and interleukin 10 values in children with atopic eczema/ Probl Dermatol. 2018;53:49–63.
dermatitis syndrome (AEDS): association with clinical severity and •• Description of eczematous reactions occurring during biologi-
phenotype. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):74–81. cal therapies.
18. Larsen JM, Bonefeld CM, Poulsen SS, et al. IL-23 and T(H) 26. Czarnowicki T, He H, Krueger JG, et al. Atopic dermatitis endotypes
17-mediated inflammation in human allergic contact dermatitis. and implications for targeted therapeutics. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:486–492. 2019 Jan;143(1):1–11.
19. Dyring-Andersen B, Skov L, Løvendorf MB, et al. CD4(+) T cells 27. Caldarola G, De Simone C, Talamonti M, et al. Prevalence of cuta-
producing interleukin (IL)-17, IL-22 and interferon-γ are major effec- neous comorbidities in psoriatic patients and their impact on
tor T cells in nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:339–347. quality of life. Eur J Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):192–196.

You might also like