PRO
THBT Hazing (Perploncoan) is
necessary in the school orientation
GOVERNMENT TEAM
1ST SPEAKER GOV
OPENING
(latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general,
sebagai alasan kenapa hrs
mendukung/menentang motion)
(contoh kerangka opening)
If we look at the primary (main) issue of this
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is ..bla..bla..bla…, this condition create
negative impact of (what & what & what)….for ...
(who & who).., because it makes (who & who)
can’t (what), that’s why we agree with this
motion because….bla..bla..bla..
(contoh kerangka opening setelah diisi)
If we look at the primary (main) issue of this
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is something hard for new students to
adapt with their new school environment,
especially if they came from a very different
education level, example SMP to SMA, or from
SMA to University, since the condition of the
educational environment is very different, the
administration process also different, the
teachers also different, then it will be hard for
new students to adapt with this new educational
environment, this condition create negative
impact of disability to perform maximally in
having education process and learning activities
in that new educational environment for these
new students who do not know anything
because it makes these new students can’t enjoy
a comfortable situation and condition to have a
conducive learning process, that’s why we agree
with this motion because by having hazing in the
school or university for the new students, it will
be helping the new students to know the
situation and the condition of their new
educational environment and also to get to know
their new senior and new teacher closer, easier
and faster, so that they will not having any
difficulties to have an enjoyable and a
comfortable learning process, so that they will
get a maximum result of education in that new
educational environment
DEFINITION
CONS
THBT Hazing (Perploncoan) is NOT
necessary in the school orientation
NEGATIVE TEAM
1st SPEAKER NEG
OPENING
(latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general,
sebagai alasan kenapa hrs
mendukung/menentang motion)
Before we are talking on whether or not we
should justifying hazing in the school orientation.
Let’s see first the essence of school orientation,
let’s look back on the objective that was trying to
be brought to the floor by the school when it is
holding school orientation.
Now, as this argument goes further, it will be
end up to the conclusion that hazing is
essentially backlashing with the nature of school
orientation and the nature of school.
TEAM SPLIT
As the 1st speaker of negative side of the house, I
am going to analyze this motion into 3 major
points of contention:
1st) HA Hazing is backlashing with the Nature of
school as a place to educate students in an
intellectual and civilized manner
2nd) HA There’s no clear urgency & effectivity on
why hazing should replacing conventional
teaching method
3rd) HA conventional teaching method is more
effective to establish understanding
REBUTTAL (bantahan)
utk test essay writing , rebuttal dikosongin aja
dan tidak perlu di isi)
But before I’m going to talk about my
contention, let’s see first the argument that has
been delivered by the 1st speaker of the
affirmative side of the house, I have (example: 2)
2 major points of rebuttal
1st) On how they believe that..ABCD
2nd) On how they believe that..EFGH
1st rebuttal….
1st ) On how they believe that .. ABCD
They said that it is ABCD and bla..bla..bla..but it
is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said
that it is ABCD if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take
the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is
We define this motion by saying that,
what we mean by school orientation is the action
to introduce every detail of new school to the
new students, and what we mean by hazing is
the action of initiation or orientation or
introduction of school facilities, regulation,
teacher and administration staff in the form of a
rather strict manner that is delivered verbally
without physical contact, which involving the
participation of all new students which also
intended to welcome the new students, so that
they will get to know each other faster. And why
it is necessary, because by implementing verbal
pressure in introducing the new school, it will be
helping these new students to get to know each
and every detail of information in their new
educational environment faster rather than
using conventional way of teaching that takes
longer time, so that through hazing method they
can adapt to the new school environment faster
and finally able to reach their maximum
education potency capacity in that new
educational environment.
TEAM SPLIT
As the 1st speaker of government side of the
house, I am going to analyze this motion into 3
major points of analysis:
1st) HA hazing is more effective, faster, & efficient
to introduce the detail of the school information,
compared to the conventional method
2nd) The nature of new students
3rd) The nature of school primary obligation
CONTENT
Now let’s move on to my 1st point of contention
1st POINT) HA hazing is more effective, faster, &
efficient to introduce the detail of the school
information, compared to the conventional
method
From this point of contention, I have 2 layers of
analysis that I’m going to discuss
1st layer) HA there’s the necessity to start the
school activity as soon as possible
2nd layer) HA it would be in the interest of the
school to assist the new students to have a
conducive and sustainable situation and
condition in teaching and learning process
Now let’s talk about my 1st layer
1st layer) HA there’s the necessity to start the
not ABCD because it is bla..bla..bla..
Next rebuttal….
2nd) On how they believe that .. EFGH
They said that it is EFGH and bla..bla..bla..but in
fact it is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they
said that it is EFGH if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s
take the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why
it is not EFGH because the fact is, it is
bla..bla..bla..
CONTENT
Now let’s move on to my 1st point of contention
1st POINT) HA Hazing is backlashing with the
Nature of school as a place to educate students
in an intellectual and civilized manner
From this point of contention, I have 2 layers of
analysis that I’m going to discuss
1st layer) The definition of school orientation
2nd layer) The Nature of school as a place to
educate students in an intellectual and civilized
manner
Let’s see the first layer
1st layer) The definition of school orientation
First, I’m going to analyze the definition of school
orientation. From the definition alone, school
orientation was suppose to be meant the period
where the school has obligation to provide all of
information needed by freshman in order for
them to know the detail of their new school, all
of information, in the term of academic
information, school facility, teacher and staff
introduction, school regulation, and school
schedule. Those are the only things that new
students need to find out when the first time
they put their foot on the school yard. Because
those are the primary rights of the new students
that should be provided by the school, which is
the fulfilling of their right over information.
Yet, the opponent came up with a pretty
interesting argument, on how those rights of
information could also be taught by the means
of hazing, under the reason that not always an
educational lesson should only and could only be
taught through conventional way of teaching,
because sometimes we have to use an
unconventional way of teaching to teach certain
lesson to other person, in this case, this
unconventional way is hazing.
school activity as soon as possible
The reason on why Every parents send their
children to the school is so that their children
could get proper education, and to have proper
education every students need a convenience
and a comfortable environment, and this
comfortable environment can only be achieved if
the students have already known the
environment well.
because it has been the nature of human, to only
able to get their maximum potency and capacity
if they are being placed in the environment that
they have known well and they can feel
sustainable with. The same thing also applies to
the new students, they will be able to learn
faster and better if they feel familiar with the
school environment. Which of course this feeling
of familiarity and sustainability will only be
achieved if the students has already known
every detail of the school environment.
But the thing is, the school only has a very short
time to introduce every detail of the school to
the new students, meanwhile the school activity
has to start as soon as possible and the number
of the detail of the school that has to be
introduced is so many, that’s why conventional
method of introduction like teaching is not going
to be effective, because teaching needs longer
time and process, meanwhile hazing is more to
the point and hazing is set in a situation and
condition that force and push the new students
to know and understand faster every detail of
the new school.
Move on to my 2nd layer
2nd layer) HA it would be in the interest of the
school to assist the new students to have a
conducive and sustainable situation and
condition in teaching and learning process
The new students, like it or not like it, will be
forced by the senior to adapt faster by the
method of hazing. So the pressure that is created
in the hazing method is essentially for the sake
of the new students, in order to get to know the
school environment faster. so that after knowing
the school environment eventhough being
forced to, the new students will know what to do
and where to go when they want to deal with
some school administration in the future, this
knowledge over every detail of school that they
get from hazing method, will help them to have
Move on to my 2nd layer
2nd layer) the Nature of school as a place to
educate students in an intellectual and civilized
manner
Second, the nature of school is suppose to be the
place where the students be taught in a civilized
manner so that they can be an intellectual
civilized citizen. Yet the action of hazing is
backlashing with this very nature of school
teaching methodology, not only hazing taught
you something in an uncivilized manner, but
hazing also taught you in a not intellectual
manner of teaching. Hazing method that makes
the students to do stupid things not only
degrades them as a civilized individual but also
should be considered as an insult toward the
new students’ intellectual capacity.
How would you expect these new students
manage to transform into an intellectual and
civilized students if you teach them in a stupid
way that humiliating them as human, that put
them down below the level of normal human
that degrade the value of them as human.
Now, let’s analyze my 2nd point of contention
2nd POINT ) HA There’s no clear urgency &
effectivity on why hazing should replacing
conventional teaching method
The biggest failure from the opponent argument
was, they forget to mention, what’s wrong with
conventional way of teaching that makes it so
urgent to propose to use this unconventional
way of teaching (which is hazing)?
If we see from the perspective of the objective of
school orientation which is to give information
toward the new students, at least the opponent
team should mention first, that the status quo,
which is the conventional way of teaching and
giving information and introduce the student on
school regulation, schedule, facilities, etc is
essentially not effective to be understood by the
new students.
Well, maybe the opponent could say that all of
those new students are so stupid and so
stubborn that it is hopeless and useless to
employ normal way of introduction and
information providing through normal way of
conducive and sustainable learning process in
the new school. So that they can get their
educational achievement in that school. So
fundamentally it would be also in the interest of
the school to assist the new students to have a
conducive and sustainable situation and
condition in teaching and learning process,
eventhough it should be obtained through
hazing method.
Now let’s analyze my 2nd point of contention
2nd POINT) The nature of new students
From this point of contention, I have 2 layers of
discussion that I’m going to analyze
1st layer) HA the new students are coming from a
different educational background
2nd layer) HA the new students have right and
the necessity to be assisted in order to adapt in
the new educational environment
Let’s analyze the 1st layer
1st layer) HA the new students are coming from a
different educational background
The new students are coming from a very
different background of educational
environment. in which in their previous school
which is SMP, the condition and the situation is
very different, not just the building, but also they
way how things work in that new school, the
teacher, the administration staff, the schedule,
the lesson, the canteen, the library, and
everything is so much different from their
previous educational environment, and the fact
is even from one SMP to another SMP has
different system and different environment,
moreover if it is different level of education, like
from SMP to SMA, or from SMA to university,
this totally new environment will create
confusing and disorientation for the new
students on how to do things in that new school,
example, they will not know where they have to
go when they want to pay tuition fee, how to
deal with administration issue, and they won’t
even know the way to go to the toilet, that’s why
they need help, they need the senior and the
school to give them orientation.
Let’s analyze the 2nd layer
2nd layer) HA the new students have right and
the necessity to be assisted in order to adapt in
the new educational environment
teaching upon them. That at the end of the day,
the school should uses desperate measure by
employing a rather violent way to provide and
teach the detail of school information.
First we have to say to the opponent team to
stop have this over paranoia that all of new
students are so naughty and can’t be control in a
normal and civilized manner. Our opponent
should wake up and open their eyes so that they
can see that their over paranoia has no ground
at all.
Welcome to my 3rd point of contention
3rd POINT) HA conventional teaching method is
more effective to establish understanding
We believe a complete understanding toward
any rule and regulation can only be achieved
through intellectual and civilized way of teaching
without any threat or fear at all, so that since
they don’t get any threat or fear then when the
students obeying a certain regulation, even
though there’s no senior or teacher around, it
would be because of their total understanding
over the expectancy of the regulation.
Suppose you are a headmaster, would you
betray and staining the true nature of school
obligation as the provider of place of intellectual
and civilized people which suppose to educate
students in a civilized and intellectual manner, by
allowing the uncivilized not intellectual practice
of hazing?
CONCLUSION
So I have proven to you that Hazing is not
necessary in the school orientation, under 4
major points of argumentation:
1st) The definition of school orientation
2nd) There’s no clear urgency & effectivety on
why hazing should replacing conventional
teaching method
3rd) HA conventional teaching method is more
effective to establish understanding
CLOSING
So. Based on all of those considerations, we beg
you to oppose
Since the new students are now part of the
school, then they also has the right to get
information related to their school, because they
have done their obligation to the school, by
paying registration fee, by following the entry
test, so that’s why they have the right to get
information, every detail of information related
to the school. That’s called the balance of right
and obligation, where every individual has the
right to get their right if they have done their
obligation. Now in this case, the new students
have the right to get information from the
school, because they have done their obligation
to the school.

Now, move on to my 3rd point of contention

3rd POINT) The nature of school primary
obligation
In the first place, the school has the obligation to
provide information needed by the new
students. If it is not the school, then who else,
you can not expect the new students wondering
around to try to figure out the regulation and the
system of the school, because that would be a
violation toward the new students right to get
information. If the school doesn’t want to
provide information to the new students, it
means the school has failed to do it’s obligation
as a school, which is as the provider of
information to the new students.

CONCLUSION
So I have proven to you that Hazing is necessary
in the school orientation, under 3 major points
of contention:
1st) HA hazing is more effective, faster, & efficient
to introduce the detail of the school information,
compared to the conventional method
2nd) The nature of new students
3rd) The nature of school primary obligation

CLOSING
So, based on all of those considerations, we beg
you to propose.

2ND SPEAKER GOV 2ND SPEAKER NEG

OPENING OPENING
(latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general, (latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general,
sebagai alasan kenapa hrs sebagai alasan kenapa hrs
mendukung/menentang motion) mendukung/menentang motion)
If we look at the primary (main) issue of this If we look at the primary (main) issue of this
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is ..bla..bla..bla…, this condition create
negative impact of (what & what & what)….for ...
(who & who).., because it makes (who & who)
can’t (what), that’s why we agree with this
motion because….bla..bla..bla..
(coba bikin sendiri isinya)
TEAM SPLIT
As the 2nd speaker of affirmative side of the
house, I am going to break down this motion into
3 major points of contention:
1st) HA hazing does not have the qualification to
be categorized as bullying
2nd) The method of teaching a lesson is vary
3rd) The positive objective of hazing
REBUTTAL (bantahan)
(utk test essay writing , rebuttal dikosongin aja
dan tidak perlu di isi)
But before I’m going to talk about my
contention, let’s see first the argument that has
been delivered by the 1st speaker of the negative
side of the house, I have (example: 2) 2 major
points of rebuttal
1st) On how they believe that..ABCD
2nd) On how they believe that..EFGH
1st rebuttal….
1st ) On how they believe that .. ABCD
They said that it is ABCD and bla..bla..bla..but it
is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said
that it is ABCD if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take
the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is
not ABCD because it is bla..bla..bla..
Next rebuttal….
2nd) On how they believe that .. EFGH
They said that it is EFGH and bla..bla..bla..but in
fact it is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they
said that it is EFGH if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s
take the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why
it is not EFGH because the fact is, it is
bla..bla..bla..
Now let’s move on to my 1st point of contention
1st POINT) HA hazing does not have the
qualification to be categorized as bullying
Let’s analyze first the nature of bullying and
what result that is expected from the action of
bullying. Generally it is believed that bullying was
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is ..bla..bla..bla…, this condition create
negative impact of (what & what & what)….for ...
(who & who).., because it makes (who & who)
can’t (what), that’s why we don’t agree with this
motion because….bla..bla..bla..
(coba bikin sendiri isinya)
TEAM SPLIT
As the 2nd speaker of opposition side of the
house, I am going to discuss this motion into 2
major points of submission:
1st) HA The harm of hazing does not worthy the
benefit, in fact it has no benefit at all.
2nd) HA Hazing perpetrators only using made up
reason to justify their action of making fun their
junior
REBUTTAL (bantahan)
utk test essay writing , rebuttal dikosongin aja
dan tidak perlu di isi)
But before I’m going to talk about my
contention, let’s see first the argument that has
been delivered by the 2nd speaker of the
government side of the house, I have (example:
2) 2 major points of rebuttal
1st) On how they believe that..ABCD
2nd) On how they believe that..EFGH
1st rebuttal….
1st ) On how they believe that .. ABCD
They said that it is ABCD and bla..bla..bla..but it
is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said
that it is ABCD if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take
the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is
not ABCD because it is bla..bla..bla..
Next rebuttal….
2nd) On how they believe that .. EFGH
They said that it is EFGH and bla..bla..bla..but in
fact it is actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they
said that it is EFGH if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s
take the example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why
it is not EFGH because the fact is, it is
bla..bla..bla..
CONTENT
Now let’s move on to my 1st point of submission
1st POINT) HA The harm of hazing does not
worthy the benefit, in fact it has no benefit at
all.
meant and purposed as an activity to put
negative impact toward the object of bullying,
physically or psychologically, so in the fist place
the intention of bullying action is clear, which is
to give harm toward the individual who become
the object of bullying.
Meanwhile, if we were to scrutinize the very
objective of hazing in the school/university
orientation/initiation, it is clear, that the purpose
is to give positive development toward the
object of hazing itself. Which is to help the new
students and to introduce them to the new
school, teacher, administration, and senior, so
that, it is expected that the new students can
adapt with the new school, and have a maximum
result of learning process in that new school
Now let’s talk about my 2nd point of argument
2nd POINT) The method of teaching a lesson is
vary
Now, does an inconvenience method of
stimulating positive development of an
individual in the school orientation by employing
hazing method would be similar and can be
categorized as bullying?
Does the experience of learning something
should always be packaged in a comfortable
method and manner?
If we analyzed deeper on the essence of learning
or teaching something, we would come to the
conclusion that, a lesson, not always be achieved
through a comfortable experience, because
sometimes it is necessary also to package the
lesson in an uncomfortable experience and
method.
Example: when a mother angry to her children
and told the children to not do this and then
punish the children by telling them to do this and
that, it is not because that the mother want to
bullying her children and want to make fun of
her children, because in fact it is sign of love and
care, the mother doesn’t want the children to
get something bad in the future by doing a
certain mistake, that’s why in order to make the
children understand, the mother has to tell the
children in a more strict manner and method, so
that the children will not do the mistake again.
For the sake of these children in the future
From this point of submission, I have 2 layers of
argument that I’m going to analyze
1st layer) Hazing only create fake discipline and
understanding
2nd layer) conventional teaching method is more
effective to establish understanding
Let’s analyze the First layer
1st layer) HA Hazing only create fake discipline
and understanding
If the objective of hazing is to create discipline,
then it would be only a fake or artificial
discipline, because the new students only
obeying the rule because they are afraid of being
verbally and psychologically harassed by their
senior. So the obeying of regulation does not
come from their understanding of why they
should do this or should not do this, but merely
only based on fear over punishment from the
senior, so they will only obey the rule if there’s
senior around, but when there’s no senior they
will have the tendency to not obeying the rule,
thus this kind of order, is only a fake order,
which only lies on the surface, and never touch
the fundamental understanding of each of the
new students.
Move on to the 2nd layer
2nd layer) HA Hazing possesses the potential to
create worse physical harm
Other potential harming of hazing is, there’s a
tendency the senior got carried away and lost
their control and do some physical abused
toward the new student. There have been so
many cases where the new students got killed
because of the punishment from the senior.
Moreover if this new students has some
particular serious medical record.
Now, suppose you are a parent, and after
knowing all of this facts would rather to let your
kids being degraded their human value as a
uncivilized citizen and being insult their
intellectual capacity by making them doing some
stupid activity and wearing stupid accessories?
With a bonus if you are lucky enough, a
probability bonus to get your son r daughter
being killed just because too exhausted doing
some stupid punishment from the senior?
Or would you rather to have your son and
So fundamentally, a lesson could also be taught
through a strict method using an inconvenience
manner and method. And the objective is in fact
want to give betterment for the students.
Because the school and the senior care and love
their junior or their new students, that’s why the
have to use hazing method to make the new
students understand about the detail of school
information faster, so that the new students can
start their learning activity as soon as possible.
Now let’s analyze my 3rd point of submission
3rd POINT) The positive objective of hazing
The very purpose of senior to employ hazing
upon their junior (freshmen) is simple, to give
them understanding over some particular
regulation in school, in which sometimes this
senior has to act as the authority in the school
orientation who can give direct punishment
(psychologically or verbally) toward any junior
(freshmen) who perpetrating any action that can
be qualified as a breach toward the school
primary regulation. It is essentially a simulation
of what you should be doing and what you
should not be doing during school period. School
orientation would a perfect time to introduce
this fact to the junior, in which they will get
certain punishment from school, if they breach
certain regulation of school.
So the purpose of hazing is obvious, besides give
them information of school in a faster way,
hazing method also teach this junior a discipline
toward school regulation that they will be facing
during their period of studying in that particular
school.
Thus, hazing does not have the qualification to
be categorized as bullying, becasue the real
objective of hazing is to give positive
development toward its object, meanwhile the
objective of bullying is to give negative casualties
toward its object.
So we could argue that, yes, hazing is necessary,
and no, hazing does not equal to bullying.
CONCLUSION
So I have proven to you that Hazing is necessary
in the school orientation, under 3 major points
of contention:
daughter to be embraced their value as civilized
human being and their intellectual capacity, with
of course the bonus of safety insurance without
afraid your kid being killed just because some
stupid punishment?
Now let’s analyze my 2nd point of contention
2nd POINT) HA Hazing perpetrators only using
made up reason to justify their action of making
fun their junior
Even if those stupid accessories that the new
students wear believed to representing some
particular meaning or symbol and some
particular activities like greetings or apologize to
the senior by doing some idiotic movement like
jumping around or doing some stupid dancing by
saying “Kakak maafin” was believed by the
senior to teach them about discipline and to
respect the senior. We believe that all of those
reasons are only artificial/fake reasons that are
made up to justify the senior to make fun on
their junior.
Back to nature of school which is to educate
their student in a civilized and intellectual
manner. Now, if the reason was to teach them
about discipline, then why not doing it under the
frame of concept of the nature of school itself,
which is by upholding the intellectual and
civilized method of teaching. Because that’s the
nature and the obligation of school in the first
place, which is to give them understanding on
everything through intellectual way of
education. Thus implementing hazing would be
equal to a betrayal over school true nature and
obligation, or other way saying it, the school
betrays its own obligation as the provider of
intellectual and civilized education method.
CONCLUSION
So I have shown to you that Hazing is not
necessary in the school orientation, under 2
major points of contention:
1st) The harm of hazing does not worthy the
benefit, in fact it has no benefit at all.
2nd) HA Hazing perpetrators only using made up
reason to justify their action of making fun their
junior
CLOSING
1st) HA hazing does not have the qualification to
be categorized as bullying
2nd) The method of teaching a lesson is vary
3rd) The positive objective of hazing
CLOSING
So, based on all of those explanations, we are so
very proud to propose.
3RD SPEAKER GOV/NEG (utk test essay writing ,
3rd speaker dikosongin aja dan tidak perlu di isi)
OPENING
(latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general,
sebagai alasan kenapa hrs
mendukung/menentang motion)
If we look at the primary (main) issue of this
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is ..Bla..bla..bla…, this condition create
negative impact of (what & what & what)….for ...
(who & who).., because it makes (who & who)
can’t (what), that’s why we agree/don’t agree
with this motion because….bla..bla..bla..
(coba bikin sendiri isinya)
REBUTTAL (bantahan)
utk test essay writing , rebuttal dikosongin aja
dan tidak perlu di isi)
I have (example: 2) two major points of rebuttal
from today debate
1st) On how actually..ABCD
2nd) On how actually..EFGH
My 1st major point of rebuttal is
1st POINT) On how actually.... ABCD
I have 2 layers under this ABCD point
1st layer) On how actually…AB
2nd layer) On how actually…CD
1st layer) On how actually…AB
They said that it is AB and bla..bla..bla.., but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is AB if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… So that’s why it is not
AB because it is bla..bla..bla..
2nd layer) On how actually…CD
They said that it is CD and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is CD if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… So that’s why it is not
CD because it is bla..bla..bla..
So, based on all of those analysis, we are very
proud to oppose.
3RD SPEAKER GOV/NEG (utk test essay writing ,
3rd speaker dikosongin aja dan tidak perlu di isi)
OPENING
(latar belakang mslah, scara singkat dn general,
sebagai alasan kenapa hrs
mendukung/menentang motion)
If we look at the primary (main) issue of this
motion in the status quo (nowadays), we could
see that it is ..Bla..bla..bla…, this condition create
negative impact of (what & what & what)….for ...
(who & who).., because it makes (who & who)
can’t (what), that’s why we agree/don’t agree
with this motion because….bla..bla..bla..
(coba bikin sendiri isinya)
REBUTTAL (bantahan)
utk test essay writing , rebuttal dikosongin aja
dan tidak perlu di isi)
I have (example: 2) two major points of rebuttal
from today debate
1st) On how actually..ABCD
2nd) On how actually..EFGH
My 1st major point of rebuttal is
1st POINT) On how actually.... ABCD
I have 2 layers under this ABCD point
1st layer) On how actually…AB
2nd layer) On how actually…CD
1st layer) On how actually…AB
They said that it is AB and bla..bla..bla.., but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is AB if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… So that’s why it is not
AB because it is bla..bla..bla..
2nd layer) On how actually…CD
They said that it is CD and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is CD if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… So that’s why it is not
CD because it is bla..bla..bla..
Move on to my 2nd major point of rebuttal
2nd POINT) On how actually.... EFGH
I have 2 layers under this EFGH point
1st layer) On how actually…EF
2nd layer) On how actually…GH
1st layer) On how actually…EF
They said that it is EF and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is EF if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is not
EF because it is bla..bla..bla..
2nd layer) On how actually…GH
They said that it is GH and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is GH if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is not
GH because it is bla..bla..bla..
REBUILD
Mirip dengan conclusion, tapi ditambah sedikit
contoh2 tambahan, penjelasan singkat dan
penekanan untuk menguatkan kembali
argument team yang sudah disampaikan
CONCLUSION
So my team has shown to you that Hazing is not
necessary in the school orientation, under 2
major points of rebuttal:
1st ) On how actually.... ABCD
1st ) On how actually.... EFGH
CLOSING
So, based on all of those analysis, we are very
proud to propose/oppose.
REPLY SPEAKER (GOV/NEG) (membandingkan
argument team lawan dan team kita)
(utk test essay writing, reply tdk perlu diisi)
OPENING & TEAM SPLIT
I am going to analyze today debate under two
major points of reply speech:
1st) from the objective (alasan) and the urgency
(mendesaknya) of the proposal
2nd) from the effectivity and the sustainability
(ketahanan) of the proposal
3rd) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
Move on to my 2nd major point of rebuttal
2nd POINT) On how actually.... EFGH
I have 2 layers under this EFGH point
1st layer) On how actually…EF
2nd layer) On how actually…GH
1st layer) On how actually…EF
They said that it is EF and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is EF if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is not
EF because it is bla..bla..bla..
2nd layer) On how actually…GH
They said that it is GH and bla..bla..bla..but it is
actually bla..bla..bla..so how come they said that
it is GH if it is not bla..bla..bla…, let’s take the
example of…bla..bla..bla… so that’s why it is not
GH because it is bla..bla..bla..
REBUILD
Mirip dengan conclusion, tapi ditambah sedikit
contoh2 tambahan, penjelasan singkat dan
penekanan untuk menguatkan kembali
argument team yang sudah disampaikan
CONCLUSION
So my team has shown to you that Hazing is not
necessary in the school orientation, under 2
major points of rebuttal:
1st ) On how actually.... ABCD
1st ) On how actually.... EFGH
CLOSING
So, based on all of those analysis, we are very
proud to propose/oppose.
REPLY SPEAKER (GOV/NEG) (membandingkan
argument team lawan dan team kita)
(utk test essay writing, reply tdk perlu diisi)
OPENING & TEAM SPLIT
I am going to analyze today debate under two
major points of reply speech:
1st) from the objective (alasan) and the urgency
(mendesaknya) of the proposal
2nd) from the effectivity and the sustainability
(ketahanan) of the proposal
3rd) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
CONTENT
Now let’s analyze the 1st point of my reply
1st POINT) from the objective and the urgency of
the proposal
Objective (alasan utama) on why their team and
our team proposing our proposal:
From the side of the opponent, we see that the
objective and the urgency on why the opponent
team said their proposal is because
bal..bla..bla…, but we see, this reason alone
could not and should not be considered as a
valid reason that can be accepted, because
bal..bla..bla…, that’s why, since in the first place
there’s no significant and important reason that
can be used as their ground to justify the
implementation of their proposal, thus their
reason can’t be used as a solid and valid ground
to implement their particular proposal.
Meanwhile, our team gave you a more solid and
valid ground to justify the implementation of our
proposal which is because of bla..bla..bla…, so
that’s why from the beginning until the end if
this debate our team has a stronger reason and a
more upperhand justification.
2nd POINT) from the effectivity and the
sustainability of the proposal
From the side of the opponent, we see that the
effectivity and the sustainability of the proposal
of the opponent team is zero bal..bla..bla…,
because if the objective of the proposal of this
motion is to achieve ba..bla.bla…then we see
their proposal is not going to be effective to
achieve that goal. Moreover, when being
implemented, the sustainability of the proposal
also zero, because there’s lack of bla..bla..bla…,
that’s why their proposal is not effective to
attain the goal of this motion, which is to…
bal.bla..bla..
Meanwhile, our team gave you a more solid and
valid explanation on how it will be more effective
to obtain the goal of the proposal because our
proposal is bla..bla..bla..bla.. and provide
bla..bla..bla…that’s why our proposal is also
more effective to get the objective of this
motion.
3rd POINT) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
CONTENT
Now let’s analyze the 1st point of my reply
1st POINT) from the objective and the urgency of
the proposal
Objective (alasan utama) on why their team and
our team proposing our proposal:
From the side of the opponent, we see that the
objective and the urgency on why the opponent
team said their proposal is because
bal..bla..bla…, but we see, this reason alone
could not and should not be considered as a
valid reason that can be accepted, because
bal..bla..bla…, that’s why, since in the first place
there’s no significant and important reason that
can be used as their ground to justify the
implementation of their proposal, thus their
reason can’t be used as a solid and valid ground
to implement their particular proposal.
Meanwhile, our team gave you a more solid and
valid ground to justify the implementation of our
proposal which is because of bla..bla..bla…, so
that’s why from the beginning until the end if
this debate our team has a stronger reason and a
more upperhand justification.
2nd POINT) from the effectivity and the
sustainability of the proposal
From the side of the opponent, we see that the
effectivity and the sustainability of the proposal
of the opponent team is zero bal..bla..bla…,
because if the objective of the proposal of this
motion is to achieve ba..bla.bla…then we see
their proposal is not going to be effective to
achieve that goal. Moreover, when being
implemented, the sustainability of the proposal
also zero, because there’s lack of bla..bla..bla…,
that’s why their proposal is not effective to
attain the goal of this motion, which is to…
bal.bla..bla..
Meanwhile, our team gave you a more solid and
valid explanation on how it will be more effective
to obtain the goal of the proposal because our
proposal is bla..bla..bla..bla.. and provide
bla..bla..bla…that’s why our proposal is also
more effective to get the objective of this
motion.
3rd POINT) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
From the side of the opponent, we see that
there’s an inconsistency and backstabbing when
their 1st speaker said bla..bla..bla…, but then
their 2nd speaker said bla..bla..bla…, in fact they
are supposed to said ba..bla..bla…,the fact that
they said ba..bla..bla..means they are arguing
their own argument, it shows their inconsistency
in delivering their own argument
CONCLUSION
So overall, from the beginning of the debate and
until at the end of the debate today, our team
has a more upperhand position than the
opponent team, because we have been
successfully given a more convincing and deeper
analysis on
1st) the objective and the urgency of the proposal
2nd the effectivity and the sustainability of the
proposal
3rd) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
We believe that our proposal has a more valid
objective and urgency to be justified to be
implemented and also we have shown you how
our proposal would be more effective to obtain
the goal that is expected and how our proposal
would be more have endurance and
sustainability when it is being employed to serve
as the solvency to the problem that we have in
status quo of this particular motion
CLOSING
So based on all of those analysis and
consideration, we believe we deserve to win this
debate.
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
From the side of the opponent, we see that
there’s an inconsistency and backstabbing when
their 1st speaker said bla..bla..bla…, but then
their 2nd speaker said bla..bla..bla…, in fact they
are supposed to said ba..bla..bla…,the fact that
they said ba..bla..bla..means they are arguing
their own argument, it shows their inconsistency
in delivering their own argument
CONCLUSION
So overall, from the beginning of the debate and
until at the end of the debate today, our team
has a more upperhand position than the
opponent team, because we have been
successfully given a more convincing and deeper
analysis on
1st) the objective and the urgency of the proposal
2nd the effectivity and the sustainability of the
proposal
3rd) inconsistency or backstabbing of the
opponent team argument (pakai point ini, jika
memang bnr ada back stabbing dari pihak lawan)
We believe that our proposal has a more valid
objective and urgency to be justified to be
implemented and also we have shown you how
our proposal would be more effective to obtain
the goal that is expected and how our proposal
would be more have endurance and
sustainability when it is being employed to serve
as the solvency to the problem that we have in
status quo of this particular motion
CLOSING
So based on all of those analysis and
consideration, we believe we deserve to win this
debate.