Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practical Microsimulation Modelling Practical Econometrics Odonoghue Full Chapter PDF
Practical Microsimulation Modelling Practical Econometrics Odonoghue Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-ada-practical-guide-to-dental-
implants-1st-edition-luigi-o-massa/
https://ebookmass.com/product/reproducible-econometrics-using-r-
jeffrey-s-racine/
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-econometrics-3rd-
edition-james-h-stock/
https://ebookmass.com/product/principles-of-econometrics-5th-ed-
r-carter-hill/
Introduction to Econometrics, Global Edition James H.
Stock
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-econometrics-
global-edition-james-h-stock/
https://ebookmass.com/product/trapped-brides-of-the-kindred-
book-29-faith-anderson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/estimation-and-inference-in-
econometrics-1st-edition-russell-davidson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-python-for-
econometrics-statistics-and-data-analysis-kevin-sheppard/
https://ebookmass.com/product/applied-financial-econometrics-
theory-method-and-applications-1st-edition-maiti/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Practical Econometrics
Series editors
Jurgen Doornik and Bronwyn Hall
Non-Parametric Econometrics
Ibrahim Ahamada and Emmanuel Flachaire
Practical
Microsimulation
Modelling
Cathal O’Donoghue
1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
1
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Cathal O’Donoghue 2021
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2021
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021935786
ISBN 978–0–19–885287–2
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198852872.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Preface
This book describes the lessons that I have learnt over the course of developing
my skills as a microsimulation modeller and co-generating knowledge and
experience with Ph.D. and master’s students and with industry clients.
While I have built many models over the course of my career, the research
in this book draws on lessons from four models:
Dynamic Static
USA UK AUS Spatial
TAXMOD
1980’s CORSIM LIFEMOD IFS Taxben
PENSIM
DYNACAN POLIMOD
HARDING
1990’s SWITCH
DYNAMOD
SVERIGE
SAGEMOD
LIAM EUROMOD
POLISIM PENSIM2
EU Leeds
2000’s MIDAS x 3
DYNASIM III APPSIM
SMILE
LIAM2
viii Preface
Preface ix
For much of the period since the foundation of the field, knowledge has
been codified mainly through the following forms:
x Preface
• documents that may have only been available to those who attended an
event and were rarely included in the usual citation indices and search-
able databases
• papers published in peer-reviewed formats, which were typically in
journals where the focus was on the application rather than the
methodology
A significant proportion of the methods used in the field are not formally
codified, meaning that new models have had to reinvent the wheel and
redevelop existing methods over and over again. Where methods were for-
mally codified, they were often codified in non-peer-reviewed technical notes
or discussion papers and thus lack the quality assurance that peer review can
help to achieve. Another issue is that publication in a research-centre tech
nical paper or note carries risks associated with the ending of funding, retire-
ment of staff, or the end of the life of a model. Thus, there is a sustainability
risk for the field in respect to its core methodological foundations.
A classic example of this is the methodology in relation to alignment, used
in dynamic microsimulation models. It is a calibration mechanism used to
align simulated totals to external control totals, and has been used since the
1970s. It is, thus, a core methodology within the field. However, there is rela-
tively little documentation or guidance as to how to undertake alignment.
Where it exists, it is published in non- peer-reviewed technical papers
(Bækgaard 2002) as team-specific internal documentation (Johnson 2001;
Morrison 2006), conference papers (Kelly and Percival 2009; Chénard 2000a),
or in relatively hard-to-find volumes based on conferences (Neufeld 2000;
Chénard 2000b). It should be noted that all these references date from 2000
onward, despite the methodology being used since the 1970s. Most are not
peer reviewed and most are hard to find, and, given the dissolution of some of
the teams, are impossible to access. One of the first peer-reviewed journal art
icles that aims to assess the performance of a part of the methodology was only
published in 2014 (Li and O’Donoghue 2014). This chapter covers the align-
ment of only a single variable type. Is it any wonder that the methodology has
received serious criticism (Winder 2000)?
It is arguable that the development of a method cannot be trusted until it
has been road-tested through publication and rigorous peer review. There is,
thus, a need for a literature to be developed to document, test, and provide
rigorous quality assurance for the alignment of the many other variables that
are found in the literature. The example above cites an issue in relation to one
specific aspect of the methodology. This criticism could be extended to many
other methods used within the field of microsimulation.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Preface xi
This book is an attempt to codify and describe many of the main tech-
niques utilized in microsimulation modelling, and to present examples of
how they are used.
I am grateful both to my many peers in the field of microsimulation and to
students that I have learned from and taught over the past twenty-five years.
I am also grateful to helpful comments by anonymous referees and to my
colleague Mary Ryan for extensive comments on the draft document. I hope
this book provides a helpful guide for those wishing to develop models
within the field. I would like to acknowledge the understanding and support
of Rosaleen and Jude as I prepared this book.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Table of Contents
PART I. INTRODUCTION
1. Introduction 3
1.1 Introduction 3
1.2 Types of Microsimulation Models 12
1.3 Overview 23
2. Xlsim: Developing A Software Tool to Assist Training and
Learning In Microsimulation Modelling 25
2.1 Introduction 25
2.2 Theoretical Objectives 26
2.3 Software Evaluation For A Microsimulation Development 31
2.4 Methodology: The Computing Framework Of Xlsim 40
2.5 Summary 45
2.6 Appendix 46
Table of Contents xv
References 267
Index 297
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
List of Figures
List of Tables
xx List of Tables
PART I
INTRODUCTION
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
1
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Public policy design increasingly expects and relies upon a body of evidence
to make decisions. Better evidence can produce better and more focused
policies. It can allow for better targeting of resources, improving the cost of
achieving a particular policy objective, or improving the effectiveness of a
policy for a given resource. Targeted policy interventions require better
information on who is affected, how they are affected, and where those who
are affected are located. For example, a transfer programme targeted at a
group that are generally poor, such as the elderly, may cost more than an
instrument that is targeted on the basis of income, and so is targeted specif
ically at the poor. However, this targeting or means testing may introduce
negative incentives. Thus, designing effective policy requires a micro-based
unit of analysis, containing information on how a policy will affect individ
uals differentially.
While there is a large range of methodologies utilized in undertaking
evidence-based policy analysis, they can be classified broadly into the fol
lowing categories:
4 Introduction
costs. They are less accurate than ex- post methods as the structure of
behaviour may change in response to policy instrument or they may be
based upon historical data. However, the methodology may be the only one
possible in many circumstances.
Microsimulation modelling is a potential simulation-based tool with a
micro-unit of analysis that can be used for ex-ante analysis (O’Donoghue
2014). It is a micro-based methodology, typically utilizing micro-data units
of analysis, for example taking surveys or datasets containing micro-units
such as households, individuals, firms, and farms, etc. It is a simulation-
based methodology that utilizes computer programs to simulate public
policy and economic or social changes on the micro-population of interest.
While microsimulation models have taken firms (Eliasson 1991; Buslei et al.
2014) or farms (O’Donoghue 2017) as the micro-unit of analysis, most have
carried out analysis at the level of individuals or households (see Mot 1992;
Sutherland and Figari 2013)
As a research field, microsimulation has its roots in the work of Guy
Orcutt (1957, 1961). However, it was only the advent of the personal com
puter in the 1980s and the availability of micro-data that have allowed the
field to develop. Whether formally defined as microsimulation modelling or
not, micro-based, ex-ante simulation-based analysis is now used extensively
around the world for policy analysis and design.
There have been a number of survey articles written such as Merz
(1991, 1994), Mot (1992), Martini and Trivellato (1997), Bourguignon and
Spadaro (2006), Dekkers and van Leeuwen (2010), and Anderson and Hicks
(2011). Generally, Sutherland (1995) covered static models; Klevmarken
(1997) behavioural models; O’Donoghue (2001), Zaidi and Rake (2001),
Spielauer (2007), and Li and O’Donoghue (2013) dynamic models; Rahman
and Harding (2016), Rahman et al. (2010), Hermes and Poulsen (2012),
Tanton and Edwards (2013), Tanton (2014), and O’Donoghue et al. (2014)
spatial models; Creedy and Duncan (2002), Creedy and Kalb (2005), and
Bargain and Peichl (2013) labour supply models; Figari and Tasseva (2013) a
special issue on the cross-country EUROMOD model; Brown (2011) health
models; and Ahmed and O’Donoghue (2007), Cockburn et al. (2010), and
Bourguignon et al. (2010) covered macro-micro models. The O’Donoghue
(2014) handbook brings together developments across a variety of different
areas. Given the growth in microsimulation over the past twenty years, there
is a need for a text book to assimilate this literature and describe the develop
ment and implementation of current practice in the microsimulation field.
Public policy is broad, with many objectives and associated targets.
Microsimulation modelling can in principle be applied to assess the micro
impact of many policy areas, subject to data availability and to the capacity
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Introduction 5
to quantify the impact of the policy. This book will focus primarily on
policies associated with the distribution of income such as poverty, income
inequality, and labour supply incentives. These are the areas in which the
methodology has seen most use over time. However, there are also many
other areas in which the methodology has been widely used, particularly in
the areas of transport (Miller 2014), health (Schofield et al. 2014), urban
planning (Waddell et al. 2003), and farm-level modelling (O’Donoghue 2017;
Shrestha et al. 2016).
Microsimulation models can be produced in different programming
environments. Relatively simple models can be programmed in Microsoft
EXCEL, while more sophisticated models use statistical software such as SAS
or Stata, or programming languages such as C++, VB, and Java (Hancock
1997). There are no specific software packages for undertaking microsimula
tion, but a number of frameworks have been used to build m odels for differ
ent purposes, for example the EUROMOD (Immervoll and O’Donoghue
2009), MODGEN (Spielauer 2011), and LIAM2 (De Menten et al. 2014)
frameworks.
Other modelling methods, such as computable general equilibrium
models (CGE) (De Melo 1988; Van Ruijven et al. 2015), overlapping gener
ations models (OGM) (Lambrecht et al. 2005; Bommier and Lee 2003), or
agent-based models (Tesfatsion and Judd 2006; Gatti et al. 2018), incorpor
ate behaviour in a more detailed or consistent way than microsimulation
models, but typically do not have the same heterogeneity of population or
detail in relation to policy. Linking these models with microsimulation
models can generate some of the advantages of both methods, illustrated by
attempts to link more detailed behavioural models such as CGE (Cockburn
et al. 2014) with microsimulation models.
• population structure
• behavioural response to the policy
• policy structure
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
6 Introduction
Population
Policy Behaviour
Introduction 7
Population Population
Time Place
Policy analysis frequently tries to understand how a policy will impact the
‘average’ family. The OECD’s average production worker examination of com
parative tax and social policy is an example of such analysis (Pearson &
Scarpetta 2000; Burlacu et al. 2014). However, familiarity with micro-data
makes one realize that there is in fact no average family, such as a single-earner
couple with children and living on the average wage. For example, looking at
the structure of the Irish population in 2005 using the Survey of Income and
Living Conditions, there are 33.5 per cent of the population living in house
holds defined as a couple with children. Of these, 13.1 per cent are single-
earner couples and of these less than 2 per cent have earnings at or close to the
average wage. Thus, the so called ‘average’ contains only a tiny fraction of the
population, reflecting the high degree of heterogeneity-derived complexity
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
8 Introduction
300
250
200
150
€ per week
100
50
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
–50
–100
Introduction 9
300
250
200
150
€ per week
100
50
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
–50
–100
instrument was targeted at families working more than twenty hours per
week, with the objective of reducing the unemployment trap. It too was
means tested at the rate of 60 per ent, however it also extended means testing
higher up the income distribution. At the same time, reforms were made to
take low-income individuals out of the tax net, but with a relatively high,
marginal tax rate of 40 per cent.
This system of policies, all with relatively straightforward and reasonable
objectives, evolved over time. However combined, this system produced sig
nificant complexity and unintended interactions. Here, quite a significant
proportion of low-income families with children faced a withdrawal rate of
60 per cent of the FIS, combined with a marginal income-tax rate of 40 per
cent and a social-insurance contribution rate of about 8 per cent, combining
to produce a marginal effective tax rate of 108 per cent (Callan et al. 1995)
(Figure 1.5). This resulted in a ‘poverty trap’ where individuals have no
incentive to increase their working hours even if they wished to, as earning
an extra pound would result in their net income falling by eight pence.
Capturing the detail of actual legal rules, microsimulation models allow for
complex interactions between different policy instruments to be identified.
10 Introduction
300
250
200
150
€ per week
100
50
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
–50
–100
Introduction 11
12 Introduction
In this section, the types of model considered throughout this book are
introduced.
Hypothetical
Families
Model Framework
Tax-Benefit Routine
Analytical Routines
• illustrative purposes
• validation
• cross-national comparisons
• replacement of insufficient or lack of micro-data
• communication with the public
Hypothetical family models have been applied to many fields, but the
dominant policy area is that of social security and taxation. Given their rela
tive simplicity, their geographic spread has been widespread, with the UK,
the US, Australia, and Ireland having the highest share of such models.
Methodologically, the chapter on hypothetical models focuses on a variety of
choices, including the unit and period of analysis, updating, and analytical
output measures, which are common to other types of model, as well as
modelling choices specific to hypothetical models, such as the unit of vari
ation by which heterogeneity is introduced to hypothetical models.
Due to their simplicity, they are very useful communication devices, as is
evident from their use in media reports. As a developer of models, they are
also specifically useful as validation models for testing components. The
more complex a model, the more difficult it is to validate, so running a simu
lation on a small set of families can help to identify any bugs. When data are
not available for a particular analysis, as in the case of some life-cycle
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
14 Introduction
Database
Model Framework
Analytical Routines:
RR/METR Tax-Benefit Routine
Output Routine
16 Introduction
Database
Analytical Routines:
RR/METR
Model Framework
Output Routine
Tax-Benefit Routine
Labour Supply
Routine
18 Introduction
Database
Model Framework
Consumption
Behaviour
The environment as a policy issue has increased dramatically over the past
four decades. Research in this area extends from global challenges, such as
climate change, access to water and soils, ozone emissions, and biodiversity
loss, to issues with a smaller geographical scope, such as water quality and
traffic congestion to the impact of the environment on health. Hynes and
O’Donoghue (2014) describe the use and development of environmental
microsimulation models.
The use of microsimulation modelling in the realm of the environment
overlaps with many traditional areas of such modelling, such as the distribu
tional incidence of public policies or the impact on behaviour in relation to
the incidence of these policies. Within the environmental and natural-
resource economics literature, the interaction between human activity and
the environment has also been shown to be strongly influenced by spatial
location. In this regard, the use of spatial microsimulation models has proven
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
IO Model
Consumption
Behaviour
20 Introduction
which policy impacts upon the income distribution. Bargain (2014) considers
the methodology used to decompose the drivers of the income distribution.
Traditionally, models have modelled inequality with and without particular
policies, or modelled the impact of an actual policy change.
Bargain highlights challenges in relation to the decomposability of
inequality and poverty indices and the decomposition of changes contem
poraneously into factor and income components. It considers a methodology
developed in recent years using microsimulation to construct counterfactual
situations and to disentangle the pure effect of a policy change from changes
in the environment in which the policy operates. The methodology decom
poses inequality change into policy, income growth, and other effects,
although linearity in tax-benefit systems sees the income-growth component
eliminated.
The methodology has been applied to study the effect of policy changes in
France and Ireland, policies implemented in the UK under the Labour gov
ernment of 1997–2001, and the effect of tax-benefit policies on non-welfarist
aggregated measures that value leisure in addition to disposable income. In
addition, the role of policy developments occurring during 2008–10, the first
‘dip’ in the Great Recession, in four European countries and over the long
term in the UK and the US, have also been examined using the methodology.
Increasing availability of data in developing countries has allowed for the
field to be extended beyond OECD countries over the past two decades.
Essama-Nssah (2014) consider microsimulation techniques commonly used
to assess variations in individual and social outcomes associated with the
process of development to try to explain distributional change by decompos
ing it into its various determining factors.
Figure 1.11 describes the structure of a model used for decomposing
inequality. It essentially compares two datasets, relating either to two separ
ate countries or two separate time periods. Income- generation models
(IGM) are estimated for both countries to describe the labour and capital
markets and to describe the distribution of market-income components of
both periods or countries. Tax-benefit models describe the generation of dis
posable income. IGMs are swapped to simulate the impact of alternative
market incomes and swap the tax-benefit systems, in order to simulate the
impact of alternative systems to get eight different combinations.
Alternatively, the IGM could be separated into market participation and
market income to give sixteen combinations. Inequality can be calculated for
each combination to describe the impact of individual components on the
distribution of disposable income.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
Database1 Database2
Model Framework
Inequality
Decomposition
Thus far, the focus has been on models that utilize datasets for a specific
point in time and a specific place. However, policies often have a temporal
dimension, as in the case of the accumulation of pension entitlement over
time, the impact of long-term demographic change, or location-specific pol
icy and behaviour, as in the case of urban renewal, rural development, or
migration behaviour.
Dynamic microsimulation models simulate inter-temporal transitions in
the population for use in policies that require this information, such as for
pensions and student loans, or to provide an inter- temporal analytical
dimension, such as life-cycle redistribution.
Li et al. (2014) describe the methodological choices faced by builders of
these models, and Figure 1.12 describes this structure. At the core of the
model lies a system of equations or behavioural routines that age the charac
teristics of a population (e.g., mortality, fertility, labour market, incomes,
tax-benefits, and family formation, etc.). In that way, the population is pro
jected forward though time at a micro-level. Some behavioural routines may,
in a similar way to labour-supply routines, react to policy changes in, for
example, retirement-choice decisions.
The main applications of dynamic microsimulation modelling are unsur
prisingly, given the life-cycle nature of pensions, life-course redistribution,
and inter-generational redistribution. However, the methodology is broad
ening to include health and spatial- and education-focused models.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
22 Introduction
Output Routine
Model Framework
Analytical Routines:
Database RR/METR
Behavioural
Routine
If Behaviour depends
on Tax-Benefit System
Tax-Benefit Routine
Most models are aligned, closed cross-section models focused using dis
crete time. In relation to the last choice, about one-third of the models
incorporate endogenous behaviour, incorporating this dimension of com
plexity discussed in the previous sub-section.
Overview 23
Behavioural
Response
1.3 Overview
This section presents an overview of the topics that will be covered in the
book. The focus of the book relates to the practical development of micro
simulation models, highlighting in turn policy context, issues associated
with the preparation of data used in the model, issues associated with valid
ation, and how to measure outcomes generated in the model, with each
chapter containing a specific policy simulation.
The primary policy focus of the book is on using microsimulation model
ling for policy-related inequality analysis. Drawing upon the complexity
analogy, the book concentrates initially on social-protection policy for hypo
thetical families, abstracting from most aspects of complexity, thus focusing
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 26/06/21, SPi
24 Introduction
Galen and Avicenna are still regarded as the leading masters of the
profession, and their treatises are the only ones that are studied.
Diseases are divided into hot and cold. A cold remedy is applied to a
hot disease, and a hot remedy to a cold one. The doctors bleed
patients suffering from malarial fever. They keep small-pox endemic
by their curious remedies. Silver armlets containing texts out of the
Kurán are worn as preservatives of health. The saints and
estakhharehs are sometimes the only doctors. “The One who sends
fever takes it away ... Khodá rahím ast (God is merciful).... If He
wants me to remain here He will cure me.... He is the best doctor.”
Offerings in money or in sweet-meats are given to the poor for the
patient’s recovery. The money is placed under the pillow every night,
and is distributed every morning among the needy. The patient,
despite the stifling atmosphere, is persuaded to believe in a speedy
recovery, everybody telling him that he will soon be quite kushdell or
cheerful. But when the end draws near a priest is summoned in
haste, and the dying man, if he has no just cause of complaint
against a child or against his wife, says not a word as to the
distribution of his property, having full confidence that the divine law
will be religiously followed. He instructs the priest as to the rites to be
observed at his funeral and the offerings to be paid for the peace of
his soul. He may command his sons to obey their mother and to
respect their sisters. If he has no issue he may settle his property on
a school, a mosque, a saint, or a water cistern.
The corpse must not remain more than twenty-four hours in the
house. The hammámí, or bath-keeper, now enters the house in the
capacity of an undertaker. He places the body on a korsi, that is, on
a raised wooden platform in the middle of the room; a copy of the
Kurán and a decanter of rose-water are set down near the head; and
a cashmere shawl is laid over the remains. For a month or forty days
after burial a ghari or hired priest keeps watch over the grave,
praying for the soul’s peace of the newly-departed, and reading the
Kurán aloud. On the night of the interment the percussion of the
grave, the fesharé-ghabre, is supposed to take place. The priest
must keep on reciting a certain passage of the Kurán, called Ayatu’l-
Kúrsí or the Verse of the Throne, in order to extend the space and
prevent the pressure. Then come Monker and Nakír—those livid-
faced angels of death—and question the deceased concerning his
faith. If his answers be satisfactory, ’Alí will cause him to be
refreshed by the air of Paradise; if not, he will be beaten on the
temples with iron maces.
The evening before I left Mecca for Jiddah I was suffering from a
racking headache, and my friends advised me to consult a certain
Arab physician. The curiosity to have an interview with this leech
overcame my scepticism concerning his health-giving touch, so off I
went to the east of the town where he dwelt, taking my guide with
me; and there, in a winding lane some three feet wide, we found his
house. My guide summoned the servant by banging at the outer
door with his club. In about ten minutes what we judged to be a small
urchin appeared behind the door and asked us in a piping treble
what we wanted. Having assured himself that we were not Bedouin
Arabs bent on pillaging the sacred house, he drew back the bars,
bidding us enter in the name of God the Merciful and Clement.
The courtyard through which we passed was unpaved and not more
than five yards square. The apartments—six fetid cells—ranged
round three sides of it. The hakím’s room faced the door. We walked
in with the greeting “Salám ’aleykum! Peace be unto you!” The faith-
healer was seated cross-legged on a mat in a corner of the cell. He
rose to receive us, saying “Bismillah! in the name of God!” the
Eastern equivalent of “Please come in.” He was of middle height,
lean, of a pleasing countenance; his eyes were deep-set, brilliant,
smiling; his beard measured the span of a man’s hand; and his teeth
flashed between lips framed for laughter. He wore a white
handkerchief round his head, and a long blue gown reached to his
ankles. Nothing could exceed the courtesy of our host. As a mark of
respect, he insisted on my taking his place; my guide, heaving a “Yá-
Allah!” and a sigh of relief, sank to my side on the left; while the
sunny-faced saint, squatting at my right hand, turned a beaming eye
on his trusty henchboy, who was standing in the doorway, waiting for
the orders of his lord and master.
In the East they never break the ice of silence with a remark on the
weather. The customary opening is to inquire if you are in health. I
told the doctor, in answer to his question, that I had a bad headache,
and had come to him to be cured. When he had raised his hands
and cried out “Yá-Muhammad!” thereby invoking the Prophet to lend
him the assistance he required, it was to ask me on which side the
head ached. I touched the spot, whereon he fell to rubbing it
vigorously with the palm of his right hand, calling out the while to the
urchin to fetch the necessary apparatus for the forthcoming
operation. The boy disappeared. In a few minutes he came back,
bearing in both his hands a round hollow plate of clay in which were
a few lumps of burning charcoal.
The next things he brought in were a couple of round iron rods about
twice the length of an ordinary pencil, together with a cup filled with a
black fluid used as ink and composed, if I mistake not, of a mixture of
starch and the soot of an oil lamp. The doctor thrust the rods in the
glowing charcoal. The fear of being branded bathed my brow in
sweat. The doctor, assuring me that I had no cause to be afraid,
cried out: “If we lose heart at the sight of these little rods, how much
the more shall we suffer when we feel the weight of the maces of the
angels of punishment. May God protect you from the fire of hell!”
The tips of the rods by this time were red-hot. Having dipped them in
the cup of ink, he closed his eyes, and then raised his voice in an
incantation that lasted several minutes. Not a single word could I
understand. When it was over he opened his eyes, and, saying the
word “Bismillah,” proceeded to draw with one of the rods on my right
temple five perpendicular lines crossed by five horizontal ones, thus
forming sixteen tiny squares. The same pattern was traced on the
left temple with the second rod. Several magic hieroglyphics besides
were inscribed in the same manner behind my ears and on the nape
of my neck.
After every operation the good doctor would pause to ask me: “Is the
pain gone now?” Four times did I tell him the truth; then, fearing that
he would begin to tattoo my body, I assured the persevering little
man that I never felt better in my life. His joy knew no bounds.
Raising his hands to heaven, he cried, “Praise be to God Almighty,
who hath sent to this poor family a power so miraculous. The secret
was bequeathed to my father by the Lord God, and when my father
died he left it to me as an inheritance. On no account must you wash
off the signs until to-morrow morning; for if you do the pain will return
to punish you. The blight of the Evil Eye was the cause of your
headache. Go in peace. You are welcome.”
The following day I set out on my homeward journey, taking Seyyid
’Alí with me as far as Jiddah; and when I said good-bye to him I felt
that I was losing an entertaining companion. That the reader may
experience the same feeling of loss in parting from me is my dearest
hope on bidding him farewell.
AN ARAB SHEYKH OF THE TOWN.
APPENDIX
By WILFRID SPARROY
SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE EXISTENCE OF A SLAVE
MARKET IN MECCA
I brought the notes of “Hájí Ráz” to a conclusion in the last chapter;
and he himself has bidden the reader farewell. It now remains for me
to say a few words on what I conceive to be the greatest weakness
in the Mussulman faith as interpreted by the Mullahs; and in so doing
I wish it to be understood, particularly by my Eastern readers, that I
am solely responsible for the opinions I am about to express on the
subject of the Mussulman’s attitude to slavery, the existence of
which, in the fourteenth century of the Hegira, must be a source of
some misgiving on the part of those who sympathise with so much in
the Muslim creed. And I appeal throughout to the enlightened laymen
of our Indian Empire, on whose interpretations of the Prophet’s
message the welfare of Islám will, in the future, depend in an ever-
increasing degree.
Now, the British are the champions of freedom: under their flag every
man is born free. Nothing is more hateful, to their way of thinking,
than that one human being should be the slave of another. In their
opinion the quality of slavery is to brutalise both the slave and his
master—the slave by depriving him of the self-respect which is the
heritage of every man who is free to choose his own career and to
rule, within the limits of humanity, his own destiny; and the master,
by making him the owner of a human soul—a responsibility so awful
that it is far more likely to lower him to the level of a beast than it is to
raise him to the height of a god. If this, in brief, be a fair statement of
the British attitude towards slavery, it will be interesting and, in a
measure, enlightening to the reader to follow, by way of contrast, the
argument supported by the ordinary Mussulman.
To be frank, the present-day followers of the Prophet—those who
have not been brought under the influence of European civilisation—
have far less sympathy with the opinions expressed in the opening
paragraph, than had Muhammad himself. Humanly speaking, the
British crusade against slavery is not only beyond their
comprehension—it is also above it. Their outlook on life, with its
rights, its limitations, and its responsibilities, differs fundamentally
from that of the followers of the Founder of Christianity. The
Christian, who speaks of himself as “a child of God and an inheritor
of the Kingdom of Heaven,” believes, if we misinterpret him not, that
the first step is with him, and the road with God. In other words, he
holds the inspiriting belief, which is, indeed, the source of all his
worldly progress and his prosperity, that God has given him the right
to act of his own initiative, but not the power—or only a
circumscribed power—to foresee whither his actions will lead him.
Therefore, in calling himself “a child of God,” he has chosen the title
that would best express his independence and his limitations. The
Muhammadan, on the other hand, cannot admit that he has the
power to move of his own free will, much less the right to do so. He
holds that every true Muslim is, and must be, “the slave of God,” the
theory of free-will being to the Muslim trend of thought so
antagonistic that it has come to bear much the same meaning as
lawlessness. Hence his aversion from Europe and all its ways.
“How,” he asks, “can morality and law flourish in a continent, in which
thought is free, in which women are free, in which God’s will is
superseded by the will of man? Freedom? I say we are all the slaves
of God, even when we are the slaves of other men. There is not one
creature who is free to act. Only the Creator is free. It is our
predestined lot to be submissive to His will.”
I hope the reader is following the thread of my argument. It is the
feeling of the East which I would attempt to lay bare. The existence
of slavery in these days is the natural outcome of that feeling. Many
a child is kept illiterate for no other reason than because its father is
illiterate. If the father is a pea-parcher or a bean-roaster, the son
must be a pea-parcher or a bean-roaster; for a son is nothing more
than a child of its father. This thraldom, to a lad of originality and
spirit, is unbearable, but he must either endure it, or else run the risk
of being an outcast. Thus the son is the slave of his father. In his turn
the father is under the bondage of his spiritual director, who too often
serves no other God than Mammon. The tendency of the Muslim,
however, is to accept the guidance of his “master” with
unquestioning humility. All might go well with him if his “master”—we
mean his priest—were always a man to be trusted, and the right man
to lead. Unfortunately the Muslim priest more often than not is more
unenlightened, more selfish, more avaricious, more unscrupulous
than most of his flock, and thus there is a danger of his enslaving the
whole fold. Poor sheep, they, believing him to be the shepherd of
God, are accustomed to follow him whithersoever he may ensnare
them. They are doomed to perish together on the rock of
Predestination, unless these “masters” can be brought to revise the
interpretation they have put on their Prophet’s teaching. Muhammad,
as a matter of fact, was careful not to draw a too narrow line
between the scope and the limitations of the human will. There is
nothing in his message which need deter a progressive Muslim from
accepting the belief that the first step is with him always, and there is
no doubt that the acceptance of such a belief by the whole Muslim
world would go far to breathe new life into the body politic. For it
would give to the imagination an ever-widening vision of human
responsibility, of human knowledge, and of human destiny. It would
emancipate every race that is proud to pay allegiance to the Prophet,
and would make slavery, in its widest as well as in its literal sense, a
curse of the unredeemed past.
“We know,” says Mr. J. H. Shorthouse, speaking in the words of an
oracular voice, addressing the King of Diamonds in a pack of cards,
“that we possess a power by which the fall of the cards is
systematised and controlled. To a higher intelligence than ours,
doubtless, combinations which seem to us inscrutable are as easily
analysed and controlled. In proportion as intellect advances we know
this to be the case, and these two would seem to run side by side
into the infinite—law, and intellect, which perceives law, until we
arrive at the insoluble problem whether law is the result of intellect or
intellect of law.”
Now, the Mussulman, in trying to solve this problem, seems to me to
have chosen the solution which is more likely than not to paralyse
the intellect and clog the wheels of progress. For if he is oppressed
or poor or ignorant or unhappy, he may say it is God’s will that he
should be so; and thus he may remain stationary, making no effort to
keep abreast with the march of civilisation. In other words, he may
come to be a slave to his god. And so, to make an end of this
preamble, it is not surprising that in countries where most men are to
some extent slaves, socially and politically speaking, there should be
men and women who belong, as purchasable and saleable chattels,
to such families as can afford to buy them. But—and this is an all-
important point—the Prophet wrought his manly utmost to mitigate
the ill-effects of slavery: it flourished exceedingly, as every schoolboy
knows, long before his time, and in other countries besides his own;
but, thanks to Muhammad’s laws, the lot of the slaves of Islám was,
and is still, immensely happier than was ever that of the slaves of
pagan Rome or of Christian North America. It is related that Abdullah
Ansari went one day to visit the Prophet, and received from him the
following instructions; “On this the last Friday of Ramazán, you must
devote yourself ‘to taking leave’ of the month, and to redeeming as
many slaves as you can: and these things you must do in order that
God may be gracious unto you.” The “leave-taking,” be it known to
the reader, is practised every year, but the old custom of setting
one’s slaves free on the last day of the congregation of the Muslim
Lent has completely died out. However, though it was not possible
for Muhammad to abolish slavery in a lifetime, the system being far
too deeply rooted in the customs of the country, he fully realised the
oppression to which the slaves had been subjected, and left nothing
undone which would ameliorate their fate.
Thus, in Súra xxiv. of the Kurán, entitled “Light,” it is written: “And
unto such of your slaves as desire a written instrument allowing them
to redeem themselves on the payment of a certain sum, write one, if
ye know good in them: that is, if ye have found them faithful, and
have reason to believe they will fulfil their engagement; and give
them likewise of the riches of God which He hath given you, either
by bestowing on them of your own substance or by abating them a
part of their ransom.” Some commentators believe the last
admonition to be addressed not only to the masters but to Muslims in
general, making it an obligation on them all to assist those who have
obtained their liberty and paid their ransom, either by giving the
ransomed slaves of their own stock, or by admitting them to have a