Information Technology Project Management

Course Instructor: Professor Loay enaya

Done by:
Hamza Alsayed
Areen Ghzawi
Hamza Odeh
Hamza Shadfan
Mohammad Hattab
Noor Abugharbieh
 Aerostrike Aerial Defense LTD
Elevating the fight, to new heights
 Table of Contents
BusinessSummary……………………………………………………………………………….

● Response to Military demand:

● Incorporating current Technology developments:
● Improved performance
● Economic benefits:

Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Problem Statements…………………………………………………………………………………………
Company Description……………………………………………………………………………………….
Abstract………………………………………………………………..

● Historical Context
● Military Theory
● ITPM in arms development

ITPM applications in developing 6th Generation fightersMarket Trends……

SWOT Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Target Market …………………………………………………………
Profiling competitors…………………………………………………………………………………………
Statement of Work………………………………………………………..
Stakeholder Register…………………………………………………………………………………………
Project charter…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Cost estimates and Resources (Five Year Outline)…………………………………………
Project execution……………………………………………
O-level Diagram………………………………………………………………………………………..
Work breakdown Structure…………………………………………………………..
Milestones…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Project Selection and Adoption

business summary

ASADS executives wish to create 6th generation combat aircraft called F-77

Thunderbolt for a number of reasons:

1. Response to Military demand:

The needs and demands of modern military markets has indicated a drive

toward the development of 6th generation fighter aircraft. It may be necessary

to replace older, less modern aircraft when they near the end of their useful

lifetimes or become dated. This causes air forces many deficiencies in combat

as other nations seek to develop more resilient models and henceforth creates

a power imbalance.

2. Incorporating current Technology developments:

The creation of 6th generation fighter aircraft may have been motivated by a

desire to create the aircraft using the most recent technological developments

and incorporate said innovations into modern combat systems, hence

maximizing their potential. This might involve the use of modern materials,
avionics, and propulsion systems, as well as the incorporation of cutting-edge

technology like artificial intelligence.

3. Improved performance:

In comparison to earlier generations of aircraft, 6th generation fighter aircraft

may have better performance thanks to their higher agility, quicker speeds,

and longer range. This can increase their appeal to potential buyers. A jet

manufacturing business may have a competitive edge over its rivals if it

develops sixth-generation fighter aircraft, as it is a niche market previously

unadulterated. The firm might be able to attract both military and civilian

consumers by providing a newer, more sophisticated product.

4. Economic benefits:

The development and manufacture of 6th generation fighter aircraft is an

undertaking of massive scale and an endeavor requiring huge volumes of

manpower. Ranging from engineers, test pilots, computer scientists,

architects and construction workers, tasked with building several prototypes

and enhancing them to build the final version. It takes several hundreds for the

design, and several thousand for the construction / implementation. Hence

this endeavor will provide a massive ROI for the governments awarding these
contracts as it will provide immediate employment for thousands of people in

the community.

Introduction

AeroStrike Aerial Defense Systems is a leading provider of advanced jet attack

systems and technologies. Founded in 1962, the company has a long history of

delivering innovative aerial solutions to military and civilian customers for

both offensive and defensive purposes.

With a large suite of technically skilled engineers and technicians, AeroStrike

is dedicated to developing and manufacturing the latest, sleekest, and all

purpose jet attack systems on the market. From early missile warning systems,

Surface to Air missiles(SAMS) ,air-to-air transport to electronic warfare

systems and beyond, AeroStrike has a wide range of products and services to

meet the needs of its customers.

In addition to its core business values of developing and producing unique and

avante garde jet attack systems, AeroStrike is also committed to research and

development, and is constantly endeavoring for fresh ways to rebuild the

status quo in the field. Whether it's through multinational joint ventures with

other leading organizations such as Lockheed Martin and CO., freelance

engineering breakthroughs, or through its citizen R and D Department,

AeroStrike is always working to demolish the boundaries of what's plausible in

the world of modern combat aircraft.

With its failproof commitment to quality, innovation, and customer

satisfaction, AeroStrike is a trusted partner to customers around the globe, and

is poised to continue leading the way in the aerial defense industry for years to

come.

Problem statement

AeroStrike Aerial Defense Systems, a prominent manufacturer of sophisticated

jet assault systems, may suffer the following issue:

“Our firm is suffering issues keeping up with production and delivery

schedules. 6th generation Jet Combat systems are quite complex to develop

and produce due to a range of reasons. Henceforth a myriad of problems may

arise that may affect development and production schedules, keeping in mind

supply issues may arise at any given moment due to the uncommon and highly

technical nature of both the labor and the material necessary to mass produce

an all purpose combat system. We need to find a solution to simplify our

development and production processes in order to decrease delays and

expenses while retaining the excellent quality of our goods."

Company Description

ASADS, is a reputable and well merited organization that has a longstanding

track record of demolishing feats in the field of aerial engineering. Founded in

1962 Our organization has been manufacturing in response to an increased

demand for Airborne weapons, Our products have been touted as the best in

the Sky.

ASADS, won a government grant in 2021 for the development of the latest 6th

gen Fighter, F77 Thunderbolt worth, worth around 40 billion dollars. This

grant, will enable our company to make considerable profits, while paying off

R and D costs, engineering and our labor for the foreseeable future and is hence

a great opportunity for us to make a good ROI while fulfilling market needs.

Aerostrike Aerial Defense Systems is a premier jet and aircraft development

corporation that seeks to continuously build new top of the line aerial

machines. These machines are the best in their league, and their ability has

been statistically proven to outmatch any opposition. Our quality speaks for

itself on the field, and our line of items extending from our signature SAM’s to

6th Generation aircraft, have left hundreds of our customers more than happy

with both our offensive and defensive capacities.

Company timeline

1962: AeroStrike Aerial Defense Systems (ASADS) is founded as a small aircraft

manufacturer focused on developing military aircraft for the US government.

1970s: ASADS expands its product line to include a variety of military jets,

including the F-16 Fighting Falcon and the F-18 Hornet.

1980s: ASADS begins development on its first 5th generation fighter jet, the

F-35 A Thunderbolt Skyhunter.

1990s: ASADS successfully completes testing and certification of the F-35 A

Thunderbolt Skyhunter, and begins production of the aircraft for the US

military.

2000s: ASADS expands its international presence, signing contracts to sell the

F-35 A Sky Guardian to several foreign governments.

2010s: ASADS continues to innovate and develop new military aircraft,

including the F-77 Thunderbolt Skyhunter Sentinel and the F-100 Starfire.

2020s: ASADS solidifies its position as a leading military aircraft manufacturer,

with a strong portfolio of advanced aircraft and a global customer base.

Abstract

Historical context: Why Aircraft?

War by all accounts is a costly endeavor and ugly business. A massive

expenditure in men and material is the almost uncircumventable necessity

needed to conduct them. This has been resolutely evident in the first and

second world wars, both scathing conflicts, where massive technological

breakthroughs were tendered. However, these advances stood almost

negligible in the face of th​​e human toll that was garnered in order to summit

these innovations. It is ironic that the eras where human technology and

infrastructure developed most were periods concurrent with multinational and

global conflicts costing hundreds of billions of dollars to conduct. It seems

amusing that almost all technological innovations were a byproduct rather

than the main goal of wars, as commanders continued trying to figure out

ways for their men to die less.

However what if that was not to be the case? Could wars be waged at a minimal

cost and at lightning speed? That was the question that hung over the German

officer corps in 1940. Being faced with the prospect of a dual front is never an

envious position, however due to Germany's unique position in the European

hemisphere that would almost always be the case. And in the 1940 invasion of
France that question was asked and answered. Being faced with limited

resources and heavily strained oil reserves, the German army decided that

swift action was the name of the day. They organized their forces effectively

and conducted an operation, like which the world has never seen. Blitzing

through the French countryside without tears nor toil, they made their case

clear. Wars need not be costly.

However it is imperative to point out that the nature of the German innovation

was tactical and not technological. Tactics have been historically the deciding

factors of the winners and losers in wars, and have for the largest extent been

exhausted and negated with the prospect of nuclear war, and the emphasis on

infantry now, is not what it once was. Cavalry came next, and while the idea

generated ground for a while, people figured out that cavalry could easily be

destroyed by artillery. With the Onset of aircraft and air bombers, cavalry and

artillery quickly took the backseat, as they could not possibly shoot down an

F16. However it all ground to a halt in the jungles of vietnam. In effect leaving

technological innovations as the driving factor between winners and losers in

wars, with this one exception.

America's Anticommunist policy is well known by All, and it was no surprise

that in the mid 60’s America decided to introduce some good old fashioned

democracy to vietnam. Many military analysts predicted a lightning victory for

the Americans, as the Vietnamese had neither the technology,organization,

equipment nor training to even put a minutely feasible force up against the

americans. However, what they had was sheer will, a large male population

that they didn't mind expanding , a very big jungle and an unwavering belief in

the political system of communism and all the riches it would bring. Which

stands true and exhibits steadfastly that the human will is the strongest

weapon any military could bring to the table.

Military theory

Jet aircraft have come quite a distance since the first jet engine took the skies

of Hamburg, conceived in the highly technical German engineering labs of the

1930s. From the early first-generation jet fighters to the sleek

sixth-generation stealth fighters of today, an increased focus on Jet aircraft,

their continuous development and capacities for stealth and strategic purposes

has been purported.

The first jet aircraft, the German Heinkel He 178, made its maiden flight in

1939. However, it was not until after World War II that jet aircraft became more

widespread. The first generation of jet fighters, such as the British De

Havilland DH 100 Vampire and the American Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star,

were developed in the late 1940s and saw action in the Korean War. These early

jet fighters were faster and more maneuverable than their propeller-driven

counterparts, but they were also limited by their short range and lack of

firepower.

The second generation of jet fighters, such as the American F-104 Starfighter

and the Russian MiG-21, were developed in the 1950s and 1960s. These aircraft

were faster and had longer ranges than the first-generation jets, and they also

featured more advanced weapons systems. The third generation of jet fighters,

such as the American F-14 Tomcat and the Russian Su-27, were developed in

the 1970s and 1980s and featured even more advanced avionics and weapons

systems.

The fourth generation of jet fighters, such as the American F-15 Eagle and the

Russian Su-35, were developed in the 1980s and 1990s and featured even more

advanced avionics and weapons systems, as well as improved maneuverability

and stealth capabilities. The fifth generation of jet fighters, such as the

American F-22 Raptor and the Russian Su-57, were developed in the 2000s

and feature advanced stealth capabilities, supercruise (the ability to fly at

supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners), and highly integrated

avionics systems.
The sixth generation of jet fighters, which are currently in development, are

expected to feature even more advanced stealth and avionics capabilities, as

well as the ability to operate in highly contested environments. These aircraft

are expected to enter service in the 2030s.

Overall, the development of jet aircraft has been a major technological

achievement that has revolutionized the field of aviation and military strategy.

From the early first-generation jet fighters to the highly advanced

sixth-generation stealth fighters of today, jet aircraft have continually pushed

the boundaries of what is possible in the skies.

ITPM in the arms industry

In the military, IT project management involves the planning, organizing, and

controlling of resources (people, equipment, and software) to successfully

deliver an IT project on time and within budget. Military IT projects may be

focused on a wide range of goals, including improving communication and

collaboration within the military organization, modernizing and streamlining

existing systems, and developing new technologies to support military

operations.

Effective IT project management in the military requires strong leadership and

organizational skills, as well as a clear understanding of the project's

objectives and the resources available to achieve them. Project managers in the

military must also be able to adapt to the unique challenges and constraints

that can arise in a military environment, such as operational security

considerations and the need to work within tight timeframes.

To be successful, military IT project managers must also have a strong

understanding of the technical aspects of their projects and be able to work

closely with technical experts to ensure that the project's goals are met. This

may involve working with developers, network engineers, and other IT

professionals to design and implement new systems or to troubleshoot and

resolve issues as they arise.

Overall, IT project management in the military requires a combination of

technical expertise, strong leadership and communication skills, and the

ability to adapt and thrive in a fast-paced and dynamic environment.

In addition to the specific skills and knowledge required to manage IT projects

in the military, there are also several key processes and best practices that

military IT project managers should follow in order to ensure the success of

their projects. Some of these include:

Defining clear project goals and objectives: It is important for military IT

project managers to have a clear understanding of what the project is intended

to achieve, as well as the specific objectives and deliverables that need to be

met. This will help ensure that the project stays focused and on track.

Developing a project plan: A detailed project plan is essential for organizing

and managing the various tasks and activities that need to be completed in

order to deliver the project successfully. This may include identifying project

milestones, defining roles and responsibilities, and establishing a timeline for

completing each task.

Managing project resources: Military IT project managers must be adept at

managing the various resources (people, equipment, and software) that are

needed to deliver the project. This may involve coordinating with other units or

organizations within the military, as well as managing vendor relationships

and procuring necessary resources.

Tracking progress and identifying risks: Military IT project managers must be

proactive in monitoring the progress of the project and identifying potential

risks or issues that may arise. This may involve regularly reviewing project
status reports, conducting risk assessments, and taking steps to mitigate or

address any issues that are identified.

Communicating with stakeholders: Effective communication with key

stakeholders is essential for the success of any military IT project. Project

managers must be able to clearly articulate the project's goals and objectives,

as well as keep stakeholders informed of progress and any issues that may

arise.

ITPM applications in developing 6th Generation fighters

Developing computer-aided design (CAD) systems for designing and testing

the aircraft, putting manufacturing and logistics systems in place to support

the manufacture of the aircraft, and integrating avionics and other electronic

systems into the aircraft are a few examples of a wide range of ITPM

applications in ITPM. Furthermore, IT project management can be used to

supervise and organize the different IT-related tasks associated with the

design and manufacture of a 6th generation jet fighter.

In this situation, the aim of IT project management would be to make sure that

these IT-related tasks are finished on time, efficiently, and in a way that
supports the development and manufacturing of the aircraft as a whole. This

could entail setting timeframes, allocating resources, and creating project

plans. All the aforementioned activities can be managed and coordinated using

IT project management tools and techniques such as project management

software and agile methodologies.

That being said, it is very important to express that the role of ITPM is not

limited to these activities only, and that it plays a great hand in every stage of

the initiation, planning and execution of the project. From calculating angular

speeds, to manufacturing several blueprints of proposed models through

engineering software modeling tools.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths
1. Competitive edge
2. Strong Reputation
3. High ROI and Cash Flow
4. Competitive Advantage
5. expansive consumer base
6. Strong Cash Flow
7. Niche+High Demand products
Weaknesses
1-High Days inventory
2-Supply Chain Issues
3- Technical Roadblocks
4- Organization Structure
Opportunities Threats
1-Low Inflation 1-Competitors
2-Low Taxes 2-Rising Raw material cost
3-expansion of departments 3-expectational Value
4-Related Diversification into other 4-Highly dependent on Supply chain
industries

Target Market

1. Military clients:
Purchasing cutting-edge jet assault systems for their armed forces may be of
interest to governments all over the world.

2. Civilian clients:
Companies that build civilian aircraft or provide private security services are
examples of civil customers that would be interested in buying sophisticated
jet assault systems for use in their operations.

3. Research and development organizations:

To develop new jet attack systems and technologies, ASADS may be interested
in cooperating with research and development organizations including
universities and government research agencies.

4. Aerospace firms:
Aerospace firms that produce airplanes or other aerospace systems could be
interested in buying advanced jet attack systems from ASADS or working
together on R&D initiatives.
Profiling Competitors

Leading worldwide aerospace, defense, and technology company Lockheed

Martin is involved across a number of sectors, including the research and
manufacture of cutting-edge jet assault systems and technologies. As a result,
Lockheed Martin might be an ASADS rival (AeroStrike Aerial Defense Systems).

ASADS must distinguish its products by distinctive characteristics or

capabilities, or by focusing on certain market sectors, in order to compete with
Lockheed Martin and other significant competitors in the aerospace and
defense business. Along with developing ties with important clients and
partners, ASADS also has to come up with plans for maximizing its advantages
and minimizing any flaws.

Other aerospace and defense organizations like Raytheon, Northrop

Grumman, and Boeing, as well as technology companies providing goods or
services, might be rivals for ASADS.

Statement of Work:

Objectives: The objective of this work effort is to develop and deliver a new 6th
Generation Jet Combat system that meets the specifications and requirements
outlined in the attached document.

Scope: The scope of this work includes the following tasks and deliverables:

● Statement of Work Design and development of the Jet Combat systems,

including the integration of all required hardware and software
components.
● Testing and validation of the 6th Generation Combat system, including
the completion of all required laboratory and field tests.
● Delivery of a fully functional air-to-air missile system that meets all
specified performance, reliability, and safety requirements.

Resources: The following resources will be required to complete this work:

 ● Personnel: A team of engineers and technicians, including specialists in
missile design, avionics, testing and aircraft engineers.
● Materials: All necessary materials and components, including hardware,
software, and other supplies.
● Equipment: Any necessary equipment or tools, such as testing
equipment, computer hardware and software, and other specialized
tools.

Schedule: The work will be completed in accordance with the following

timeline:

● Design and development: 3 years

● Testing and validation: 1 year and six months
● Delivery: 6 months

Quality standards: The 6th Generation Jet missile system will be developed and
tested in accordance with all relevant industry standards and regulations,
including those specified in the attached document.

Pricing and payment terms: The total price for this work is 40 Billion Jordanian
Dinars, which will be invoiced in accordance with the payment schedule
outlined in the attached document.

Termination: This work may be terminated by either party upon written

notice, in the event of a material breach of this agreement by the other party.
Any disputes arising from this work effort will be resolved through binding
arbitration in accordance with the terms of this agreement.
Stakeholder Register

1) Government: As it is directly Impacted by our operations and may

regulate our fiscal, and armament limitations and production quotas at
times of War.

2) Customers: They Are directly impacted by the quality and quantity of

Products and have a vested interest in ensuring their quality, readiness
and availability.
3) Community: The community which within we operate is directly
impacted by the Scope of Our operations through concepts such as
employment, environmental impact and fiscal investment in the local
community.
4) Employees: Our employees are directly affected by the current business
operations, Cash Flows and current status Quo. Furthermore their very
livelihood depends on the company coordinates within the market and
outside of it.
5) Shareholders: Since our Company is publicly traded, then it is imperative
to denote that shareholders who helped raise funds for the company at
crucial stages are afflicted by the company's performances in the Stock
market.

Risk Analysis
Conducting a risk assessment of the F77 Thunderbolt Skyhunter is an
important part of the project management process, as it helps to identify and
manage potential risks that could impact the project. Some of the key risks that
you might consider as part of a risk assessment for the F77 Thunderbolt
Skyhunter could include:

1. Technical challenges: Developing a 6th generation fighter jet is a

complex and challenging process, and there are likely to be a number of
technical challenges that will need to be overcome in order to
successfully design and build the F77 Thunderbolt Skyhunter. Some
potential technical risks could include issues with the design or
functionality of key systems such as the engines, avionics, or weapons
systems.
2. Cost overruns: Another potential risk for the F77 Thunderbolt Skyhunter
project is the possibility of cost overruns. This could occur if the project
runs into unexpected technical challenges that require additional
resources or if there are changes to the project scope or schedule that
result in additional costs.
3. Schedule delays: Another risk that could impact the F77 Thunderbolt
Skyhunter project is the possibility of schedule delays. This could occur if
there are issues with the design or development of the aircraft, or if there
are delays in obtaining the necessary resources or approvals.
4. Changes in government regulations: The F77 Thunderbolt Skyhunter
project could also be impacted by changes in government regulations,
particularly if those changes affect the requirements for the aircraft or
the funding available for the project.

Overall, it is important to carefully assess these and other risks as part of the
risk assessment process, and to develop strategies to mitigate or manage those
risks in order to increase the chances of project success.
Project Charter

AeroStrike Air Defense Combat Systems F-77 Project Charter

Project Title: F77-Thunderbolt Sky Hunter

Project Start Date: 1/1/2022 Project end Date: 1/1/2028

Budget Information: 40 Billion Jordanian Dinars

Testing and Development:17 billion Jordanian Dinars
Testing and Validation:15 Billion Jordanian Dinars
Delivery: 8 Billion Jordanian Dinars

Project Manager: Hamza Alsayed

Project Objectives:
1. The development of the world's very First Sixth Generation air
combat System
2. The development of Sixth Gen Anti Radar detection technology
3. The innovation of new Armament Systems that carry an
increased payload capacity.
4. Related Diversification of business expeditions through
transferable skills, into armored vehicles.
5. The development of the world's first 6th Generation Air to Air
Missile And Combat Systems.

Success Criteria:
● The Successful Delivery of the latest 6th Generation Aircraft
System First!
● The creation of a new air to air missile system
● Increase payload of Aircraft while maintaining weight
● Meet government regulation
● Satisfaction of shareholders and government contractors
● Project meets both functional and nonfunctional requirements.
● Design is in line with international trade regulations

Roles and Responsibilities

Hamza Alsayed: President, Program Manager and Chief executive

 Areen Ghazawi: VP, Head of Design and Development (CPL)

Hamza Odeh: VP, Head of engineering and manufacturing (CPL)

Noor Abu Gharbieh: VP, Head of testing and Validation (CPL)

Mohammad Hattab: VP, Head of Finance (CPL)

Hamza Shadfan: VP, Head of budgeting and Finance (CPL)

Cost estimates and Resources (Five Year Outline)

Resource Resource Assignment Cost in ($)

Labor(engineering, Salaries and employee 12 billion dollars

Avionics, R and D, IT, incentives
Test Pilots)

Raw materials and Necessary for building Is a rough estimate for

Supply chain. the tens of prototypes the quantity of jets
necessary for jet needed to be built and
design and the activities
engineering supporting it, in order
to achieve the final
full functional
version. However, an
estimate of 5 billion
dollars can be given.

Outsourced labor Labor necessary for 3 billion dollars

the completion of this
large project

Avionics equipment Specialized Combat 4 billion dollars

 Aerial Equipment
critical to project
completion

Tech and Simulation, Software with 500 million dollars

Design and preeminent capacity at
Architecture Software altering Final Outcome

Operations Day to Day Operations 4.5 billion dollars

concerned with
running a project of
this scale

Maintenance (Fuel, Critical items, for 1 billion dollars

electricity, Water, power and gas

Financial Reserve Strategic Fiscal Asset 10 billion dollars

Project execution

F77 Thunderbolt Prototype

Cockpit View

O-level Diagram
Work breakdown Structure
Milestone report

Milestone Date Status Assignee Comments

RFP May 2021 Completed Alsayed RFP seemed

research,selectio feasible,
n and relevant and
justification befitting our
capacity

Developing and June 2021- Completed Technical SMes, With

Proposal Dec 2021 engineering appropriate
department and resource
design SMes allocation,
project is
feasible

Statement of January 2022 Completed Areen, Odeh

work

Developing January 2022 Completed Alsayed project

project charter manager's
approval

Stakeholder February 2022 Completed Odeh project

identification manager's
approval

Scope statement February 2022 Completed Areen

WBS February 2022 Completed Alsayed

Critical Path March 2022 Completed Alsayed

Requirement March 2022 Completed Shadfan, Odeh

analysis

Risk analysis May 2022 Completed Hattab, Noor

Resources and June 2022 Completed Noor

Costs

Advanced R and Jun 2022-Jun Completed Alsayed, Odeh Material needs a

of avionics 2025 lot of time to be
sourced due to
complexity
Ordering Raw March N/A
materials and 2023-Jun
avionics 2023
equipment

Design and Jun 2022-May In progress Odeh Multiple

engineering 2025 technical
Phase hurdles need to
be overcome

Manufacturing May In progress Noor

and Assembly of 2023-May
Prototypes 2026

Testing and May 2026-Jan N/A Areen, Hattab This is a long

Validation 1st 2028 drawn out
process, needed
to gain
certification

Closing the January 2028 N/A Areen Criteria for

project success were
met.
Scope statement

Project title : AeroStrike Aerial Defense Systems LTD

Date : Jan 8th 2022
Prepared by: Mohammad Hattab, Noor Abugharbieh, Hamza Alsayed, Hamza
Shadfan, Hamza Odeh, Areen Ghazawi.

Project Justification:
In this project, We will be building a 6th generation combat aircraft called F-77
Thunderbolt.

Project Characteristics and Requirements:

● Its ability to go on high speed in any type of conditions ;such as weather;

its predictable with its performance.
● Its wheel arrangement.
● Its user friendly, which is that it doesn’t have a complicated system.
“Easy to learn how to use”.
● It must be lightweight yet strong and can handle any type of force.
● Its covered with a bullet proof wrap.
● Its ability to provide air support and detect any threats
● The jet must be waterproof and water friendly

Summary of Project Deliverables

Project management-related Deliverables:

● Business Case.
● Scope Statement .
 ● Work Breakdown Structure.
● Project Charter.
● Project Baseline.
● Proposal creation.
● Budget reports.
● Status Reports.
● Resource Availability Reports.
● Lesson Learned.

Product-related Deliverables:

● Testing.
● Development.
● Air to Air missile systems.
● Prototyping.
● User Experience to F77 thunderbolt sky hunter.
● Payload delivery engineering.
● Aerial combat system interface.s

Requirement Analysis:

ASADS is conducting requirement analysis for its 6th generation fighter jet
project. Key steps include:

1) Identifying relevant stakeholders.

2) Gather requirements from stakeholders through interviews and workshops.
3) Documenting requirements in a clear, concise manner in a requirements
specification document.
4) Validating requirements through review and revision as necessary.
By following these steps, ASADS can complete a thorough and effective
requirement analysis for the development of its 6th generation fighter jet. This
will ensure that the project is properly defined and that all necessary
requirements are identified and understood, leading to an increased likelihood
of project success.

Requirement Structure Context Diagram:

Problems faced and Solutions

Several issues arose throughout the project:

1-Due to the lack of clear task deadlines, team members worked at varying
rates, which resulted in numerous delays and uncertainty about how the
project was progressing.
2-Poor workflow management resulted in inconsistent execution and a lack of
coordination.

3-Because team members didn't receive enough feedback, their performance

didn't match the specific goals, which led to project delays.

Even so, these issues were resolved in a variety of ways, which helped the
project succeed. Therefore, the following were project success factors:

● having a skilled project manager who could handle the issues that the
project faced on a continuous basis
● Spending enough time and money on thorough scheduling allowed for
proper planning and the elimination of delays.
● Continually monitoring the team's performance and assessing the
outcomes helped to avoid errors.
● Keeping team members informed and involved in all project activities
was made possible by holding meetings, which was an effective form of
communication.

Criteria for the project’s success

The project was efficiently planned, organized, and carried out.

The project's outcome was successful since a product of good standard was
produced.
The project's time frame was adhered to, and it was delivered on schedule.

Effective coordination, involvement, and communication were present among

tram participants.

The project was completed within the allocated budget.