Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rethinking Human Rights And Peace In Post Independence Timor Leste Through Local Perspectives Ying Hooi Khoo full chapter pdf docx
Rethinking Human Rights And Peace In Post Independence Timor Leste Through Local Perspectives Ying Hooi Khoo full chapter pdf docx
Rethinking Human Rights And Peace In Post Independence Timor Leste Through Local Perspectives Ying Hooi Khoo full chapter pdf docx
Post-Independence Timor-Leste
Through Local Perspectives Ying Hooi
Khoo
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/rethinking-human-rights-and-peace-in-post-independ
ence-timor-leste-through-local-perspectives-ying-hooi-khoo/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/un-governance-peace-and-human-
security-in-cambodia-and-timor-leste-1st-ed-edition-brendan-m-
howe/
https://ebookmass.com/product/disability-and-life-writing-in-
post-independence-ireland-1st-ed-edition-elizabeth-grubgeld/
https://ebookmass.com/product/reconstructing-our-understanding-
of-state-legitimacy-in-post-conflict-states-building-on-local-
perspectives-1st-edition-ruby-dagher/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-dignity-and-human-rights-
pablo-gilabert/
War and Peace in Somalia: National Grievances, Local
Conflict and Al-Shabaab Michael Keating
https://ebookmass.com/product/war-and-peace-in-somalia-national-
grievances-local-conflict-and-al-shabaab-michael-keating/
https://ebookmass.com/product/violence-and-peace-in-sacred-texts-
interreligious-perspectives-maria-power/
https://ebookmass.com/product/confronting-peace-local-
peacebuilding-in-the-wake-of-a-national-peace-agreement-1st-
edition-susan-h-allen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/peace-and-war-historical-
philosophical-and-anthropological-perspectives-w-john-morgan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/tax-inequality-and-human-rights-
alston/
PALGRAVE MACMILLAN STUDIES ON
HUMAN RIGHTS IN ASIA
SERIES EDITOR: MIKYOUNG KIM
Series Editor
Mikyoung Kim, Hiroshima, Japan
This Palgrave Macmillan book series addresses the rising interest in human
rights topics in Asia. It focuses on the largely underexplored territory
of Asian human rights topics highlighting its empirical manifestations,
historical trajectory and theoretical implications. It also goes beyond
the problematic dichotomy between “East” and “West” by engaging
in rigorous case-specific as well as cross-regional comparisons within
South-South context. China’s rise in world politics and its emergence
as a massive donor, for example, has significant yet troubling implica-
tions. The member countries of ASEAN and Northeast Asia, on the
other hand, would have different preoccupations and priorities calling for
context-sensitive diagnosis and prognosis to promote human right causes.
The series is multidisciplinary in nature and open to submissions
focusing on international organization, ethics, criminology, develop-
ment, freedom of expression, labour rights, environment, human/sex
trafficking, democratization, governance studies, disability, reproductive
rights, LGBT, post-/colonial as well as post-/authoritarian critiques and
social movement, among others.
The series publishes full-length monographs, and edited volumes.
Rethinking Human
Rights and Peace
in Post-Independence
Timor-Leste Through
Local Perspectives
Editors
Ying Hooi Khoo Antero Benedito da Silva
Department of International and Peace Center
Strategic Studies National University of
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Timor-Lorosa’e
University of Malaya Dili, Timor-Leste
Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
Preface
v
vi PREFACE
1 See Khoo, Y. H. (2017). How arts heal and galvanise the youth of Timor-Leste.
The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-arts-heal-and-galvanise-the-youth-
of-timor-leste-7392. Accessed 18 January 2021.
PREFACE vii
“I was asked by Dr. Ying Hooi Khoo to write an endorsement on the book
that she, Dr. Antero B. da Silva and Dr. Therese Nguyen Thi Phuong Tam
are going to publish, with the title ‘Rethinking Human Rights and Peace
in Post-Independence Timor-Leste through Local Perspectives.’ In fact,
this is a good opportunity to rethink Democracy, Human Rights, Peace
and Justice in Timor-Leste. The topics presented are all very important
and relevant. I hope the government and civil society groups are able to
read, reflect and take as a standard to improve the situation of Human
Rights and Justice in Timor-Leste. Only in this way can integral, harmo-
nious and sustainable development benefit the people of Timor-Leste. I
address my congratulations to all authors!”
—Dom Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo,Nobel Peace Prize 1996
ix
Contents
xi
xii CONTENTS
Index 133
Notes on Contributors
xiii
xiv NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
2 The original ASDT is not to be confused with the political party of the same name,
which emerged afterward.
xv
xvi ABBREVIATIONS
Y. H. Khoo (B)
Department of International and Strategic Studies,
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
e-mail: yinghooi@um.edu.my
1 Some parts of this section have been published in Human Rights Outlook
in Southeast Asia 2016, SHAPE-SEA, 147–162; Human Rights Outlook in Southeast
Asia 2017, SHAPE-SEA, 139–151; and Human Rights Outlook in Southeast Asia
2018, SHAPE-SEA, 155–168.
1 WHAT IS PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS FOR TIMORESE? 5
(PDHJ) and representatives of civil society and human rights focal points
from each ministry (RDTL, 2016). Timor-Leste also established action
plans such as a national action plan on gender-based violence (GBV), a
national action plan for zero hunger (ibid.) and a national action plan
for persons with disabilities. In 2016, the government launched an action
plan on women, peace and security.
Timor-Leste joined the UN right after their restoration of indepen-
dence. Thus far, the Timor-Leste government has ratified seven inter-
national instruments out of nine as listed in Table 1.1. The remaining
major international instruments that it has not ratified are the Convention
on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappear-
ance (ICPPED). Although the Constitution has adopted the general and
customary principles of ratified international law and treaties, ensuring
that all national legislation must not contradict international law, Timor-
Leste has not been able to fully fulfil the general recommendations of the
treaty bodies.
Having ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
(ICC), Timor-Leste has included the provisions of the Rome Statute in
national law to criminalize actions against humanity. As set out in Article
124 of the Penal Code, it will punish, with 15–30 years imprisonment,
the following acts:
But it has not yet enacted legislation providing for cooperation with the
ICC, reflecting the weaknesses in the implementation of its Penal Code,
which is not just insufficient to challenge impunity for past crimes, it is
also not consistent with the Rome Statute, other human rights treaties
or customary international law. Specifically, the Penal Code did not
include guarantees that there will be no national amnesties, pre-conviction
8 Y. H. KHOO
tensions were high during the 2006 internal political crisis,2 presiden-
tial and parliamentary elections were held the following year with only
minor incidents of violence. The Timorese people have demonstrated a
commitment to democracy; despite polarizing opinions and differences
in ideological beliefs, they are consistently united.
In 2017, more than 20 political parties contested in the March 20 pres-
idential election and the July 22 parliamentary election, the first elections
held in Timor-Leste without assistance from the international community
since the UN mission departed in 2012. The elections were a significant
success because they were held in an orderly and peaceful manner, which
showed how much the Timorese valued their hard-won democratic rights,
demonstrating an awareness that political stability is particularly crucial for
a young democratic nation (ibid.). While the calling of the early election
triggered questions about the principles of consensus politics and political
inclusion, it was crucial for settling the power struggle between the polit-
ical parties and their coalitions so that Timor-Leste’s government could
start governing properly. Furthermore, Timorese are aware that peace
is not only the absence of conflict; it must also be complemented with
sustainable development. A major issue lies in the fact that Timor-Leste’s
social and economic development has not proceeded in parallel with the
maturity of democracy within the country (ibid.).
These challenges reveal the weaknesses of the development in the state-
building process, where it is widely acknowledged that the government
needs to diversify its resource-dependent economy. Another issue is the
government’s ambitious and rapidly developing infrastructure projects,
with possible negative implications for the environment. Increasing rural-
based development is critical but it will not be simple; progress is also
intertwined with the issues of governance and balanced development.
These are some of the issues that cannot be neglected in Timor-Leste’s
political discourse, which are obvious in every part of the country. In
economic and social terms, sustainable transformation requires a contin-
uous investment in capacity-building and empowerment of the people.
The government also needs to prevent vested interests from leading the
2 Tensions between the national police and the armed forces resulted in open conflict
between the two institutions, a breakdown of law and order and the displacement of
more than 150,000 people. Political and security efforts to resolve conflict and to bring
stability continued and despite attacks on both the President and the Prime Minister in
2008, the country gradually recovered from the crisis. See also Chapter 3.
12 Y. H. KHOO
peace is not just about focusing on the role of the state, or on norms and
values, but it must also be tied to local social practices and tackle the
injustices and inequalities maintained by the international system. The
smaller the gap in power relations between local and global narratives,
the more peace can be shaped by multiple local particularisms and their
interactions (Richmond & Pogodda, 2016).
At a fundamental level, war can lead to violations of human rights and
vice versa (Isakovic, 2001). On the surface, human rights and peace are
seen as two closely interrelated concepts. The foundations of the inter-
national human rights system itself has revealed the strong connection
between the two concepts, as rooted in the experiences of the Second
World War, after which the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR) was created in 1948 based on the belief that human rights
violations threatened world peace (McGuinness, 2011). Civil and polit-
ical rights, as well as social, economic and cultural rights, are recognized
in the UDHR, but the right to development was only emphasized in the
larger international community following the 1993 Vienna Declaration
and Programme of Action (VDPA) that linked human rights with issues
such as democracy and development and the rights-based approach to the
study of development (Kindornay et al., 2012).
However, different actors have different conceptual approaches to
human rights. For instance, the ongoing debates about which “rights”
are universal and whose “rights” should be protected (Wellman, 2000).
Third-generation human rights, or “solidarity rights”, have been the most
controversial thus far and have not been as fully incorporated into inter-
national law. These include the right to development and the right to
peace. The challenge lies in how a state can integrate both concepts
into the peace framework to ensure that development is guaranteed. As
asserted by Galtung (1969), structural violence is built into a system of
inequality, resulting in an unjust social structure that can hinder people
from achieving their full potential. Galtung also introduced the concept
of “positive peace” to refer to the absence of structural violence and
the presence of social justice. Scholars also point to the fact that peace-
time institutions intended to provide justice are not just unsustainable,
but in the long run they are just not the same as building institutions
that promote human rights (Cooper, 2002) in society. In each of these
arguments, we see the assertion of human rights as an integral part of
establishing positive peace. In the context of Timor-Leste as a post-
conflict small state, there remain many practical challenges to linking
14 Y. H. KHOO
and these issues have major implications for democratization and for
stability. Socioeconomic factors in particular were clearly recognized in
the UN Secretary-General’s report soon after the 2006 political crisis,
which focused in particular on poverty and deprivation, unemployment
and a lack of opportunity, especially among the younger generation.
The political crisis of 2006 underlined the weakness of the process
of state-building, which severed the state’s connection with its subjects
and their politics, ignored the cultural priorities of local communities and
failed to address their socioeconomic concerns directly. Former president
Xanana Gusmão (2003) was aware of the problems that had emerged
with liberal peace and many of those contentious issues. He argued that
the experiences of peace-building in Timor-Leste indicated that peace was
not just a normative aim, but also a basic human right that involved
preventing not just civil violence, but an engagement with socioeconomic
deprivation and a lack of development. This argument rightly pointed to
the need to manage the liberal–local division of inequality in rights and
needs.
In response to the challenges faced by the institutionalization of liberal
peace, the Timor-Leste government sought to “legitimize” local sociopo-
litical institutions through decentralization. Such engagement is provided
for in the Constitution, which requires the state to “recognise and value
the norms and customs of East Timor that are not contrary to the Consti-
tution and to any legislation dealing specifically with customary law”,
and to “assert and value the personality and the cultural heritage of the
East Timorese people”. For instance, democratic elections were intro-
duced for aldeia chiefs, suco chiefs and suco councils as stipulated in the
Law on the Election of Suco Chiefs and Suco Councils No. 2/2004
(RDTL, 2004). And in response to the 2006 crisis, the government
held a series of reconciliation ceremonies, beginning at the village level
and culminating in a national ceremony in Dili (Jolliffe, 2008). Despite
this, disconnect between the central state and people living in rural
areas remains. While Timor-Leste holds regular elections, the formation
of a relationship between people and their elected representatives have
been challenged by the proportional, party-list electoral system, which
encourages voting along party lines. This model has been criticized for
undermining the accountability of parliamentarians and providing them
with “no compulsion to listen to an electorate” (Richmond, 2009).
16 Y. H. KHOO
discontent can weaken rule of law because people do not believe in the
national and international justice system.
Related is the notion of the post-conflict situation, which is not always
straightforward since it involves different levels and determining the
causes of conflict. Sometimes, it is difficult to determine when a conflict
has actually ended, given that unstable systematic structures could poten-
tially trigger another new form of conflict. Very often, “there is no easy
‘before’ and ‘after’ conflict” (UNDP, 2008, p. xviii). In practice, the
recovery procedures of post-conflict countries are part of a complicated
process. Different countries progress or even regress in varying ways,
and some risk backsliding into conflict. The key milestones, as identi-
fied by the UNDP (2008, p. xviii), are the: (1) easing of hostilities and
violence; (2) signing of peace agreements; (3) demobilization; (4) disar-
mament and reintegration; (5) return of refugees and internally displaced
persons (IDPs); (6) establishing the foundation for a functioning state;
(7) initiating reconciliation and societal integration; and (8) commencing
economic recovery. But each step is complicated, requires much attention
and may be lengthy. For example, the return of refugees and the reset-
tlement of IDPs remains ongoing, with many still missing in Indonesia.
Reconciliation itself constitutes four elements: justice, forgiveness, mercy
and truth (Lederach, 1999). Reconciliation is a contested concept, where
different leaders have different ideas about what this means, with some
elements more visible than others. Forgiving and forgetting the past,
rather than offering justice, dominates official discourse.
For Nader and Combs-Schilling (1977), the function of justice can be
divided into five categories. First, justice is necessary for conflict preven-
tion and to avoid new escalation. Second, justice can be a means of
rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders back to normal life. Third,
it allows the victims to believe in the values of justice once more. Fourth,
it reaffirms the rule of law and human values in society. Finally, delivering
justice is itself the active socialization of rules and values, and contributes
to their internationalization. The reconciliation process marked by the
Chega! (Enough, No More!) reports have raised doubts at the grassroots
level, where people do not feel that peace has been achieved until the reso-
lution of war crimes is brought about. The challenge is then to find out
how to interact in complex ways, which may positively affect post-conflict
reconstruction. Fragile states, according to Stewart and Brown (2009),
are those that fail or are at high risk of failing in three key dimensions
(authority, service provisions, and legitimacy), which in turn potentially
1 WHAT IS PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS FOR TIMORESE? 19
Outline of Chapters
This volume is organized around the issues mentioned above. In
Chapter 2, “Transitional Justice: A Dispute over Reconciliation and
Justice”, Antero Benedito da Silva explores the inability of the UN to
establish a transitional justice mechanism to try the Indonesian generals
and other perpetrators residing outside Indonesia who committed
violence and crimes against humanity in Timor-Leste between 1975 and
1999. He examines reconciliation as a political process that has become
complex and complicated, and seeks to provide trade-offs and perspec-
tives for possible new lives. Chapter 3, “Impunity for Human Rights
Violations and its Consequences in Timor-Leste” is closely linked, where
Juvinal Dias examines various cases of human rights violations in the
post-independence era by linking them with some of their potential
causes, with reference to historical impunity, and the failure of interna-
tional justice mechanisms to hold perpetrators accountable. Chapter 4
by Fernando A. T. Ximenes, “Democratic Discourse and Consensus
in Timor-Leste: Reintegration to Neoliberal Capitalism?”, examines the
changing global order and how these external systemic changes affect the
development of democracy and human rights discourse and practice in
this young nation.
Chapter 5 by Khoo Ying Hooi and Horacio de Almeida, “Prove-
doria Dos Direitos Humanos e Justiça (PDHJ): Between Human Rights
Activism and Limitations”, explores the role of the PDHJ that was estab-
lished under Article 27 of the Constitution, which first opened its doors
to the public in March 2006 after the promulgation of Law Number
7/2004. This chapter examines the challenges and opportunities faced by
the PDHJ in dealing with various human rights issues. Chapter 6, “Polit-
ical Uncertainty and Its Implications for Wellbeing Rights of Timorese
Society” by Jose Cornelio Guterres, discusses Timor-Leste’s inadequately
established political system led by inexperienced leaders by linking it to
the challenges in meeting the wellbeing of society. Guterres focuses on
personal, historical and economic factors in explaining political uncer-
tainty and how these factors have implications for adequate standards of
20 Y. H. KHOO
Conclusion
The dual resolutions on sustaining peace, as per the UN’s General
Assembly Resolution 70/262 and Security Council Resolution 2282
in 2016, reaffirm the importance of coherence between the UN’s
peace, security and human rights efforts, underscoring the close linkages
between security, development and human rights. Despite the increased
emphasis on links between the protection of human rights and the preven-
tion of conflict, there has been a lack of attention toward using human
rights mechanisms in sustaining peace, a challenge further exacerbated by
divisions in intergovernmental structures. The resolutions on sustaining
peace also underline the “comprehensive, inclusive and people-centred”
vision of the 2030 Agenda; reaffirming the notion of inclusivity that is
fundamental to a human rights approach.
After 2002, the institutionalization of liberal peace has faced signifi-
cant challenges in Timor-Leste, particularly with respect to development
issues. This resulted in the creation of weakly understood liberal state
institutions that were disconnected from the majority of Timorese, who
continued local sociopolitical practices. Compared to some other post-
conflict states, Timor-Leste is in many ways considered a success story in
terms of state-building. However, getting on par with other countries,
in particular regarding issues related to development, is a challenging
process. This also explains why human rights issues in Timor-Leste tend to
focus more on economic, social and cultural issues. As an oil-rich country,
the relationships between democracy and development remain far from
universally positive. The economic importance of natural resources is
especially crucial for it and other small post-conflict states. In this regard,
Timor-Leste faces the challenge of balancing resource dependence and
democracy, as well as ensuring the wellbeing of its own citizens.
The challenge, as highlighted in this book, is that a rights framework
has not been integrated into the peace and development nexus, which we
suggest as an explanation of why Timor-Leste, despite being politically
stable to some extent, remains ranked low in terms of HDI. In sum, the
notion of hybrid peace, as found in Timor-Leste, suggests the need to
move beyond the dominance of international actors as well as top-down
approaches and to follow a bottom-up approach instead, which empha-
sizes local views of politics. This would, in the long run, allow for the
renegotiation of liberal versions of democracy, the rule of law, human
rights, development and the market, where the modern state coexists
22 Y. H. KHOO
References
Alcott, L. M., Smith, M. G., & Dee, M. (2003). Peacekeeping in East Timor:
The path to independence. Lynne Rienner.
Almeida, B., & Wassel, T. (2017). Can a new law help Timor Leste’s land rights
crisis? The Asia Foundation. http://asiafoundation.org/2017/01/18/can-
new-law-help-timor-lestes-land-rights-crisis/. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.
Bacic, R., & Criekinge, J. V. (2004). Report of dealing with the past at Ohrid
Seminar 2004. War Resisters International. http://www.wri-irg.org/news/
2004/dwtp-coun04-en.htm. Accessed 19 Jan 2021.
Barnett, J. (2008). Peace and development: Towards a new synthesis. Journal of
Peace Research, 45(1), 75–89.
Belloni, R. (2012). Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and significance.
Global Governance, 18(1), 21–38.
Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history,
1400–1900. Cambridge University Press.
Chesterman, S. (2002). Timor-Leste in transition: Self-determination, state
building and the United Nations. International Peacekeeping, 9(1), 45–76.
Chomsky, N. (2015). A message from Noam Chomsky about ETAN . East Timor
and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN). https://www.etan.org/etan/2016ch
omsky_appeal.htm. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.
Cooper, S. E. (2002). Peace as a human right: The invasion of women into the
world of high international politics. Journal of Women’s History, 14(2), 9–25.
Duffield, M. (2001). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of
development and security. Zed Books.
Dunn, J. (2003). Timor-Leste: A rough passage to independence. Longueville
Books.
Feijó, R. G. (2020). Timor-Leste: Twenty years after the self-determination
referendum. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2020(1), 380–390.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace
Research, 6(3), 167–191.
Gorjão, P. (2002). The legacy and lessons of the United Nations transitional
administration in East Timor. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24, 313–336.
Gusmão, K. R. X. (2003, April 7). Challenges for peace and stability (The
Chancellor’s Human Rights Lecture). The University of Melbourne. https://
www.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1727572/20030407-
gusmao.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.
1 WHAT IS PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS FOR TIMORESE? 23
Hannum, H. (2006). Human rights in conflict resolution: The role of the office
of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in UN peacemaking and peace-
building. Human Rights Quarterly, 28(1), 1–85.
He, K. (2008). Indonesia’s foreign policy after Soeharto: International pres-
sure, democratization, and policy change. International Relations of the
Asia-Pacific, 8(1), 47–72.
Hohe, T., & Nixon, R. (2003). Reconciling justice: ‘Traditional’ law and state
judiciary in Timor-Leste. United States Institute of Peace.
Hoole, R. (2009). Sri Lanka: Ethnic strife, fratricide, and the peace vs. human
rights dilemma. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1(1), 120–139.
Isakovic, Z. (2001). Choosing between peace and human rights? Peace Research,
33(1), 37–46.
Jarstad, A. K., & Belloni, R. (2012). Introducing hybrid peace governance:
Impact and prospects of liberal peace-building. Global Governance, 18(1),
1–6.
Jolliffe, J. (2008). Psychological healing as a prerequisite to good governance in
Timor-Leste. In D. J. Mearns (Ed.), Democratic governance in Timor-Leste:
Reconciling the local and national. Charles Darwin University Press.
Khoo, Y. H. (2017, July 25). After Timor Leste’s election, a young democ-
racy looks forward. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/07/after-
timor-lestes-election-a-young-democracy-looks-forward/. Accessed 18 Jan
2021.
Khoo, Y. H. (2018, February 28). Timor-Leste’s personality politics.
The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/timor-lestes-personality-
politics/. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.
Kindornay, S., Ron, J., & Carpenter, C. (2012). Rights-based approaches to
development: Implications for NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(2), 472–
506.
Kumar, C. (2011). Building national “infrastructures for peace”: UN assistance
for internally negotiated solutions to violent conflict. Peacemaking: From
Practice to Theory, 1, 384–399.
Lederach, J. P. (1999). The journey toward reconciliation. Herald Press.
Lopatka, A. (1980). The right to live in peace as a human right. Security
Dialogue, 11(4), 361–367.
Lopes, P. D. (2016). Timor-Leste: Building on local governance structures:
Embedding United Nations peace efforts from within. In O. P. Richmond
& S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation
and state formation. Edinburgh University Press.
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and
bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.
McGregor, A. (2007). Development, foreign aid and post-development in
Timor-Leste. Third World Quarterly, 28(1), 155–170.
24 Y. H. KHOO
Introduction
Dealing with the past has both an ethical as well as a political purpose.
During transitions and ongoing conflicts, ethical demands and polit-
ical constraints can create serious dilemmas (Bacic & Criekinge, 2004).
Balancing both sets of demands then becomes a challenge to transi-
tional societies. Rigby (2003) proposes that there are three approaches
to addressing bitter histories of the past: collective amnesia, retributive
justice and truth. When speaking of collective amnesia, Rigby (2003)
refers to the Spanish dictator Francisco Franco Bahamonde, who came to
power in 1939 through a military rebellion and subsequent civil war. His
regime became infamous because of its barbaric treatment of the defeated
Republicans and their allies, and for its repressive practices throughout the
A. B. da Silva (B)
Campus Caicoli, Dili, Timor-Leste