Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Talley and Oconnors Clinical Examination 2 Volume Set 8E Oct 3 2017 - 0729542599 - Elsevier Nicholas Joseph Talley Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Talley and Oconnors Clinical Examination 2 Volume Set 8E Oct 3 2017 - 0729542599 - Elsevier Nicholas Joseph Talley Full Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Talley and Oconnors Clinical Examination 2 Volume Set 8E Oct 3 2017 - 0729542599 - Elsevier Nicholas Joseph Talley Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/his-spirit-of-christmas-new-
orleans-ladies-book-4-liz-talley/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ryans-retina-3-volume-set-6th-
edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/encyclopedia-of-environmental-
health-6-volume-set-2nd-edition-jerome-o-nriagu/
https://ebookmass.com/product/auerbachs-wilderness-
medicine-2-volume-set-7th-edition/
Nancy Caroline Emergency Care in Streets 8e Essentials
Contains 2 Books u2013 Volume 1 & Volume 2 8th Edition
https://ebookmass.com/product/nancy-caroline-emergency-care-in-
streets-8e-essentials-contains-2-books-volume-1-volume-2-8th-
edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/general-studies-for-civil-services-
preliminary-examination-2018-6-volume-set-edgar-thorpe/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advanced-fermentation-and-cell-
technology-2-volume-set-byong-h-lee/
https://ebookmass.com/product/diagnostic-ultrasound-2-volume-
set-5th-edition-edition-le%e1%b9%bfin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/encyclopedia-of-materials-
technical-ceramics-and-glasses-3-volume-set-michael-pomeroy/
TALLEY
, O 'CONNOR 'S
clinical
examination
A systematic guide to physical diagnosis
ELSEVIER
Copyrighted ~3tenal
clinical
examination
A systematic guide to physical diagnosis
8th edition
VOLUME ONE
clinical
examination
A systematic guide to physical diagnosis
8th edition
VOLUME ONE
NICHOLAS J TALLEY
MBBS (Hons)(NSW), MD (NSW), PhD (Syd), MMedSci (Clin Epi)(Newc.),
FRACP, FAFPHM, FAHMS, FRCP (Lond. & Edin.), FACP, FACG, AGAF, FAMS, FRCPI (Hon)
Laureate Professor and Pro Vice-Chancellor, Global Research, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Senior Staff Specialist, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Professor of Medicine, Professor of Epidemiology, Joint Supplemental Consultant Gastroenterology
and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Professor of Medicine,
University of North Carolina, United States; Foreign Guest Professor, Karolinska Institute, Sweden; Past
President, Royal Australasian College of Physicians
SIMON O’CONNOR
FRACP, DDU, FCSANZ
Cardiologist, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Clinical Senior Lecturer, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Student ICONSULT
• i1kli1~
books
Any screen.
Anytime.
Anywhere.
Activate the eBook version
of this title at no additional charge.
Student Consult eBooks give you the power to browse and find content,
view enhanced images, share notes and highlights-both online and offiine.
Use of the curr·ent edition of the electronic version of this oook (eBook) is subject to the terms of the nontransferable, limited license granted on
studentconsult.inkling.com. Access to the eBook is limited to the first individual who redeems the PIN, located on the inside cover of this Dook, at studentconsult.inkling.com
and may not oe transferred to another party by resale, lending, or other means.
2015v1.0
Copyrighted material
Elsevier Australia. ACN 001 002 357
(a division of Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd)
Tower 1, 475 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, NSW 2067
©2018 Elsevier Australia. 1st edition ©1988, 2nd edition ©1992, 3rd edition ©1996, 4th edition
©2001, 5th edition ©2006, 6th edition ©2010, 7th edition ©2014 Elsevier Australia
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any
information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions
policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and
the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notice
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds or experiments described
herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent
verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. To the fullest extent of the law,
no responsibility is assumed by Elsevier, authors, editors or contributors for any injury and/
or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise,
or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in
the material herein.
Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards,
inclusion in this publication does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the quality
or the value of such product or the claims made of it by its manufacturer.
Eight edition.
9780729542869 (paperback)
Includes index.
Physical diagnosis.
CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 5
The general principles of physical The cardiac examination 74
examination 37 Examination anatomy 74
Clinical examination 38 Positioning the patient 75
How to start 38 General appearance 76
Hand washing 38 Hands 79
First impressions 39 Arterial pulse 81
Vital signs 40 Rate of pulse 83
Facies 40 Rhythm 83
Jaundice 40 Radiofemoral and radial-radial delay 83
Cyanosis 41 Character and volume 84
Pallor 44 Condition of the vessel wall 84
Hair 45 Blood pressure 84
Weight, body habitus and posture 45 Measuring the blood pressure with the
Hydration 46 sphygmomanometer 86
The hand s and nails 48 Variations in blood pressure 88
Temperature 49 High blood pressure 88
Smell so Postural blood pressure 88
Preparing the patient for examination 51 Face 89
Advanced concepts: evidence-based Neck 89
clinical examination 51 Carotid arteries 89
Inter-observer agreement (reliability) and Jugular venous pressure 90
the K-statistic 53 Praecordium 92
T&O'C essentials 54 Inspection 92
Introduction to the OSCE 55 Palpation 93
References 56 Percussion 95
Auscultation 95
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• ••••• a•••• • ••••••••
Abnormalities of the heart sounds 97
~1Hit•1~f~ Murmurs of the heart 700
THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM 57 Auscultation of the neck 705
The back 106
CHAPTER 4
The abdomen and legs 106
The cardiovascular history 59
T&O'C essentials 107
Presenting symptoms 59 OSCE example- CVS examination 107
Chest pain 59 OSCE revision t opics - CVS examination 108
Dyspnoea 63 References 108
Ankle swelling 64
Palpitations 64 CHAPTER 6
Syncope, presyncope and dizziness 66 The limb examination and peripheral
Fatigue 67 vascular disease 109
Intermittent claudication and peripheral Examination anatomy 109
vascular disease 67 Arms 109
Risk factors for coronary artery Legs 709
disease 68 Lower limbs 709
Drug and treatment history 70 Peripheral vascular disease 113
Past history 70 Acute arterial occlusion 114
Social history 71 Deep venous thrombosis 115
Family history 71 Varicose vei ns 115
T&O'C essentials 71 Chronic venous disease 116
OSCE example - CVS history 72 T&O'C essentials 117
OSCE revision topics - CVS history 72 OSCE example - peripheral vascular
References 72 disease 117
..........................................................................
Neck and chest 243
~1Hit•1~1! Abdomen 244
THE GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM 215 Inspection 244
CHAPTER 13 Palpation 248
The gastrointestinal history 217 Percussion 257
Ascites 258
Presenting symptoms 217
Auscultation 260
Abdominal pain 277
Hernias 261
Patterns of pain 278
Examination anatomy 267
Appetite and weight change 278
Hernias in the groin 262
Early satiation and postprandial
Epigastric hernia 264
fullness 278
lncisional hernias 264
Nausea and vomiting 278
Rectal examination 264
Heartburn and acid regurgitation
The pelvic floor- special tests for pelvic
(gastro-oesophageal reflux
floor dysfunction 267
disease- GORD) 279
Ending the rectal exam 267
Dysphagia 220
Testing of the stools for blood 267
Diarrhoea 222
Other 268
Constipation 223
Examination of the gastrointestinal
Mucus 224
contents 268
Bleeding 224
Faeces 268
Jaundice 225
Vomitus 269
Pruritus 225
Urinalysis 269
Abdominal bloating and swelling 225
T&O'C essentials 271
Lethargy 226
OSCE revision topics - the gastrointestinal
Treatment 226
examination 271
Past history 227
References 271
Social history 227
Family history 227 CHAPTER 15
T&O'C essentials 227 Correlation of physical signs and
OSCE revision topics - the gastrointestinal gastrointestinal disease 272
history 228 272
Examination of the acute abdomen
References 228 T&O'C essential 273
Acute abdomen after blunt
CHAPTER 14 trauma 274
The gastrointestinal examination 229 Liver disease 274
Examination anatomy 229 Signs 275
Positioning the patient 230 Portal hypertension 275
General appearance 230 Signs 275
Jaundice 230 Causes 275
Weight and wasting 237 Hepatic encephalopathy 275
Skin 237 Grading 275
Mental state 234 Causes 275
Hands 235 Dysphagia 276
Nails 235 Signs 276
Palms 235 Gastrointestinal bleeding 276
Hepatic flap (asterixis) 236 Assessing degree of blood loss 276
Arms 237 Determining the possible
Face 238 bleeding site 277
Eyes 238 Inflammatory bowel disease 277
Salivary glands 239 Ulcerative colitis 277
Mouth 240 Crohn's disease 279
CHAPTER 31 CHAPTER 33
The neurological history 489 The neurological examination:
Starting off 489 speech and higher centres 540
Presenting symptoms 489 Speech 540
Headache and facial pain 490 Dysphasia 540
Faints and fits 492 Dysarthria 542
T&O'C essential 494 Dysphonia 543
Clinical medicine is at its finest when demonstrated practice but, failing that, Talley and O’Connor were
by the best exponents of the clinical examination. Like extraordinarily helpful to me.
most doctors I could name five or so of my teachers It was only in recent years that I met one of the
and colleagues who made the clinical examination both authors, Nick Talley, and I greeted him with almost
a true art and finely honed diagnostic tool. They have the same gratitude that a Harry Potter fan would greet
had my enduring admiration and respect. J.K. Rowling. It fazed him not one iota. I suspect that
In the interests of open disclosure, and in order to he, and Simon O’Connor who, unfortunately, I have
protect the integrity of Nick Talley and Simon O’Connor, not met in spite of my spending five years in Canberra,
I am obliged to point out that I never perfected the are well used to such a reaction from the doctors they
art of a smooth, seamless, comprehensive physical have assisted for the past 30 years.
examination. This 8th edition of Clinical Examination has updated,
I’m sure examiners could see me, and almost hear peer-reviewed text with recent evidence, new images,
me, thinking through the cranial nerve examination clinical hints and guidance for OSCE.
nerve by nerve in much the same way that a novice The writing is clear. The richness and the potential
dancer counts out loud the requisite steps while of an understanding of a patient gained through the
progressing through an uncomplicated routine. clinical examination shines through. The text encourages
I read, digested, wrote on and tried to memorise the the reader to think logically about their approach and
other Talley and O’Connor text Examination Medicine, it does not impose a rote learning style. Nevertheless
which was first published in 1985 and which I used there are many aids throughout to encourage retention
for my clinical examination for my Fellowship in of what has been learned. Summary chapters, diagrams,
Emergency Medicine. tables, mnemonics, tips and tests will assist a quick
The first edition of this book, Clinical Examination, revision.
was published in 1988 and is aimed particularly at Given my own interest in the art of medicine over
medical students. Perhaps if they had written this book the years, I found the chapter on clinical methods: an
a decade earlier when I was a student, as were they, I historical perspective, illuminating, grounding and
might have been more accomplished. reassuring. The art of the clinical examination is timeless
Of course a book alone, however well written, cannot and has not been forgotten by these authors.
confer proficiency in the art of history taking and
physical examination. Only repeated practice, built on Professor Chris Baggoley AO, BVSc(Hons), BM BS,
logical construction in the art, can achieve that. I suspect BSocAdmin, FACEM, FRACMA, D.Univ (Flin)
I could have done much better in my attitude to diligent EDMS, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network
Preface
Acquire the art of detachment, the virtue of method, must be fun! Unlike most other similar textbooks,
and the quality of thoroughness, but above all the ours is deliberately laced with humour and historical
grace of humility. anecdotes that generations of students have told us
Ask not what disease the person has, but rather what enhance the learning experience. Another distinguishing
person the disease has. feature is that every chapter in this book has undergone
peer review, just as you would expect would occur for
Sir William Osler
any published journal article. We have believed from the
beginning that peer review is integral to ensuring the
Welcome to the new edition of Clinical Examination,
highest possible standards and maximising the value of
which has been carefully revised and updated. Clinical
a core textbook. In this edition based on the peer review
skills are the foundation of clinical medicine, most
process we have made revisions, excluded irrelevant
importantly history taking and physical examination.
material and added updates where appropriate. Videos
In most cases, a good history and physical examination
demonstrating techniques enhance the learning
will lead you to make the correct diagnosis, and this
experience, and the e-book format supports learning
is critical—your diagnosis will more often than not
from a tablet or computer anywhere and anytime.
seal the fate of your patient and, assuming you are
We are also proud of this book being current and as
correct, take them down the optimal management path.
evidence based as is possible, with updated chapter
In order to make a correct diagnosis you need to
references and annotations so readers can dive deeper
assemble all the facts at hand. Blindly ordering tests in the
into any of the literature that interests them. We want
absence of the clinical history and relevant examination
students at all levels to know there are many limitations
often leads to serious errors. It is distressingly common
and gaps (all crying out for more research), and to
for tests to be ordered and referrals made without an
remain curious and excited about medicine as they
adequate history or even a cursory examination of
learn.
the patient. The wrong diagnosis can cause harm and
Clinical skills can be mastered only by practice and
distress that lasts a lifetime.
you should aim to see as many cases as you can while
Clinical Examination is designed to take students
studying from this or any book. You will learn from
on an exciting journey from acquiring core skills to
your patients your entire career if only you take the
an advanced level, applying a strong evidence-based
time to listen and observe.
focus. We have taken a systematic approach because
Great clinicians are made not born, and everyone
recognition of all the facts aids accurate diagnosis. The
practising medicine needs to master clinical skills.
patient presenting with, for example, heart disease may
Thank you to all those who have provided us with
have not only objective changes of disease when
expert input as we have made our revisions. We also
listening to the heart but also relevant findings in the
thank all of our colleagues and patients who educate
hands, arms, face, abdomen and legs that can guide
us daily, and the legion of students who have written
identification of the underlying disease process and
to us, including those who have pointed out omissions
prognosis. Diagnosticians are great medical detectives
or mistakes (real or perceived).
who apply rigorous methodology to uncover the truth,
solve a puzzle and commence the healing process. Nicholas J. Talley
Our book is not a traditional undergraduate textbook Simon O’Connor
and we are proud of its distinctive features. Learning Newcastle and Canberra, July 2017
Acknowledgements
This book provides an evidence-based account of Specialist Radiologist at the John Hunter Hospital, for
clinical skills. We are very grateful for the reviews, preparing the text and images within the gastrointestinal
comments and suggestions from the many outstanding system section retained from the last edition.
colleagues over the years who have helped us to develop Associate Professor S Posen, Associate Professor
and refine this book. All chapters have again been peer IPC Murray, Dr G Bauer, Dr E Wilmshurst, Dr J
reviewed, a hallmark of our books, and we have taken Stiel and Dr J Webb helped us obtain many of the
great care to revise the material based on the detailed original photographs in earlier editions. We would
reviews obtained. We take responsibility for any errors like to acknowledge and thank Glenn McCulloch for
or omissions. the photographs he supplied for this title. A set of
We would like to especially acknowledge Professor photographs come from the Mayo Clinic library and
Ian Symonds, Dean of Medicine, University of Adelaide, from FS McDonald (editor), Mayo Clinic images in
and Professor Kichu Nair, Professor of Medicine and internal medicine: self-assessment for board exam review
Associate Dean Continuing Medical Professional (Mayo Clinic Scientific Press, Rochester MN & CRC
Development, University of Newcastle, for producing Press, Boca Raton FL, 2004). We would like to thank
the videos for the OSCEs. the following from Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Dr Tom Wellings, Staff Specialist in Neurology, for their kind assistance in selecting additional
John Hunter Hospital, provided expert input into the photographic material: Dr Ashok M Patel, Dr Ayalew
neurology chapters for this edition. Dr Philip McManis Tefferi, Dr Mark R Pittelkow and Dr Eric L Matteson.
provided invaluable input into neurology for earlier We would also like to acknowledge Coleman
editions. Productions who provided new photographs.
Dr A Manoharan and Dr J Isbister provided the Dr Michael Potter and Dr Stephen Brienesse
original blood film photographs and the accompanying provided assistance with the clinical examination
text. Associate Professor L Schreiber provided the photographs.
original section on soft-tissue rheumatology. We have Elsevier Australia and the authors also extend their
revised and updated all of these sections again. appreciation to the following reviewers for their
We thank Professor Alex Ford (Leeds Teaching comments and insights on the entire manuscript:
Hospitals Trust, UK) and his team for their systematic
review of the evidence supporting (or refuting) key
clinical signs that has been retained.
Professor Brian Kelly, Dean of Medicine at the
University of Newcastle, provided valuable comments
on the psychiatry chapter.
Thank you to Dr Malcolm Thomson who provided
a number of the X-rays and scans for this title. Others
have been provided by the Medical Imaging Department
at the Canberra Hospital X-ray Library. We would like
to thank Associate Professor Lindsay Rowe, Staff
REVIEWERS
Jessica Bale, BMedRadSc, MBBS, Conjoint Lecturer
(Dermatology), University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Andrew Boyle, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, Professor of
Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Newcastle and
John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Judi Errey, BSc, MBBS, MRACGP, Senior Lecturer and
Clinical Coordinator, University of Tasmania, TAS,
Australia
Tom Goodsall, BSc, MBBS (Hons), Advanced Trainee Steven Oakley, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, Staff Specialist
Gastroenterology and General Medicine, John Hunter Rheumatologist, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle,
Hospital, NSW, Australia Australia; Conjoint Associate Professor, School of
Hadia Haikal-Mukhtar, MBBS (Melb), BSc Hons Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle,
(Melb), LLB Hons (Melb), FRACGP, Dip Ger Med Australia
(Melb), Grad Cert Health Prof Ed (Monash), Head of Robert Pickles, BMed (Hons), FRACP, Senior Staff
Auburn Clinical School, School of Medicine, Sydney, Specialist Infectious Diseases and General Medicine,
University of Notre Dame Australia, NSW, Australia John Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia; Conjoint
Adam Harris, MBChB, MMed, Conjoint lecturer at the Associate Professor, School of Medicine and Public
University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Rohan Jayasinghe, MBBS (Sydney; 1st Class Philip Rowlings, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA, MS, Director
Honours), FRACP, FCSANZ, PhD (UNSW), of Haematology, Calvary Mater Newcastle and John
MSpM(UNSW), MBA(Newcastle), Medical Director, Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia; Senior Staff Specialist
Cardiology Department, Gold Coast University Pathology North-Hunter, Professor of Medicine,
Hospital, QLD, Australia; Professor of Cardiology, University of Newcastle, Australia
Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Clinical Professor of Josephine Thomas, BMBS, FRACP, Senior Lecturer,
Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
Australia Alicia Thornton, BSc, MBBS (Hons), Conjoint Lecturer
Kelvin Kong, BSc MBBS (UNSW), FRACS (OHNS), (Dermatology), University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
VMO John Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia Scott Twaddell, BMed, FRACP, FCCP, Senior Staff
Kypros Kyprianou, MBBS, FRACP, Grad Dip Med Ed., Specialist, Department of Respiratory and Sleep
Consultant Paediatrician, Monash Children’s Hospital Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia
and Senior Lecturer, University of Melbourne, VIC, Martin Veysey, MBBS, MD, MRCP(UK), FRACP,
Australia MClinEd, Professor of Gastroenterology, Hull York
Judy Luu, MBBS, FRACP, MIPH, Staff Specialist, John Medical School, UK
Hunter Hospital, NSW; Conjoint Lecturer, University of Tom Wellings, BSc(Med), MBBS, FRACP, Staff
Newcastle, NSW, Australia Specialist Neurologist, John Hunter Hospital, NSW,
Joy Lyneham, PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Australia
Health and Medicine. University of Newcastle, NSW,
Australia
Genevieve McKew, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA, Staff
Specialist, Concord Repatriation General Hospital and
Clinical Lecturer, Concord Clinical School University of
Sydney, NSW, Australia
Balakrishnan R Nair (Kichu), AM MBBS, MD
(Newcastle) FRACP, FRCPE, FRCPG, FRCPI,
FANZSGM, GradDip Epid, Professor of Medicine and
Deputy Dean (Clinical Affairs), School of Medicine and
Public Health, Newcastle, Australia; Director, Centre for
Medical Professional Development HNE Local Health
District, Adjunct Professor University of New England,
Armidale, Australia
Christine O’Neill, MBBS(Hons), FRACS, MS, VMO
General Surgeon, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle,
NSW, Australia
Acknowledgements xxi
CONTRIBUTORS
Joerg Mattes, MBBS, MD, PhD, FRACP, Senior Staff
Specialist, John Hunter Children’s Hospital and
Professor of Paediatrics, University of Newcastle, NSW,
Australia
Bryony Ross, B.Biomed.Sc, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA,
Staff Specialist, Calvary Mater Newcastle, John Hunter
Children’s Hospital and Pathology North, NSW,
Australia; Conjoint Lecturer, School of Medicine and
Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Ian Symonds, MD, MMedSci, FRCOG, FRANZCOG,
Dean of Medicine, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
Clinical methods: an historical perspective
The best physician is the one who is able to with minute variations being recorded. These variations
differentiate the possible and the impossible. were erroneously considered to indicate changes in
Herophilus of Alexandria (335–280BC) the body’s harmony. William Harvey’s (1578–1657)
studies of the human circulation, published in 1628,
Since classical Greek times interrogation of the patient had little effect on the general understanding of the
has been considered most important because disease value of the pulse as a sign. Sanctorius (1561–1636)
was, and still is, viewed in terms of the discomfort it was the first to time the pulse using a clock, while
causes. However, the current emphasis on the use of John Floyer (1649–1734) invented the pulse watch in
history taking and physical examination for diagnosis 1707 and made regular observations of the pulse rate.
developed only in the 19th century. Although the terms Abnormalities in heart rate were described in diabetes
‘symptoms and signs’ have been part of the medical mellitus in 1776 and in thyrotoxicosis in 1786. Fever was
vocabulary since the revival of classical medicine, until studied by Hippocrates and was originally regarded as
relatively recently they were used synonymously. During an entity rather than a sign of disease. The thermoscope
the 19th century, the distinction between symptoms was devised by Sanctorius in 1625. In association with
(subjective complaints, which the clinician learns from Gabriel Fahrenheit (1686–1736), Hermann Boerhaave
the patient’s account of his or her feelings) and signs (1668–1738) introduced the thermometer as a research
(objective morbid changes detectable by the clinician) instrument and this was produced commercially in
evolved. Until the 19th century, diagnosis was empirical the middle of the 18th century. In the 13th century
and based on the classical Greek belief that all disease Johannes Actuarius (d. 1283) used a graduated glass
had a single cause: an imbalance of the four humours to examine the urine. In Harvey’s time a specimen
(yellow bile, black bile, blood and phlegm). Indeed of urine was sometimes looked at (inspected) and
the Royal College of Physicians, founded in London even tasted, and was considered to reveal secrets
in 1518, believed that clinical experience without about the body. Harvey recorded that sugar diabetes
classical learning was useless, and physicians who were (mellitus) and dropsy (oedema) could be diagnosed
College members were fined if they ascribed to any in this way. The detection of protein in the urine,
other view. At the time of Hippocrates (460?–375BC), which Frederik Dekkers (1644–1720) first described
observation (inspection) and feeling (palpation) had in 1673, was ignored until Richard Bright (1789–1858)
a place in the examination of patients. The ancient demonstrated its importance in renal disease. Although
Greeks, for example, noticed that patients with jaundice Celsus described and valued measurements such as
often had an enlarged liver that was firm and irregular. weighing and measuring a patient in the 1st century
Shaking a patient and listening for a fluid splash was AD, these methods became widely used only in the
also recognised by the Greeks. Herophilus of Alexandria 20th century. A renaissance in clinical methods began
(335–280BC) described a method of taking the pulse with the concept of Battista Morgagni (1682–1771) that
in the 4th century BC. However, it was Galen of disease was not generalised but rather arose in organs,
Pergamum (AD130–200) who established the pulse a conclusion published in 1761. Leopold Auenbrugger
as one of the major physical signs, and it continued invented chest tapping (percussion) to detect disease
to have this important role up to the 18th century, in the same year. Van Swieten, his teacher, in fact
Clinical methods: an historical perspective xxiii
used percussion to detect ascites. The technique was the philosophy of the Enlightenment, which suggested
forgotten for nearly half a century until Jean Corvisart that a rational approach to all problems was possible, the
(1755–1821) translated Auenbrugger’s work in 1808. Paris Clinical School combined physical examination
The next big step occurred with René Laënnec with autopsy as the basis of clinical medicine. The
(1781–1826), a student of Corvisart. He invented the methods of this school were first applied abroad in
stethoscope in 1816 (at first merely a roll of stiff paper) Dublin, where Robert Graves (1796–1853) and William
as an aid to diagnosing heart and lung disease by Stokes worked. Later, at Guy’s Hospital in London,
listening (auscultation). This revolutionised chest the famous trio of Richard Bright, Thomas Addison
examination, partly because it made the chest accessible (1793–1860) and Thomas Hodgkin (1798–1866) made
in patients too modest to allow a direct application of their important contributions. In 1869 Samuel Wilks
the examiner’s ear to the chest wall, as well as allowing (1824–1911) wrote on the nail changes in disease
accurate clinicopathological correlations. William Stokes and the signs he described remain important. Carl
(1804–78) published the first treatise in English on the Wunderlich’s (1815–77) work changed the concept of
use of the stethoscope in 1825. Josef Skoda’s (1805–81) temperature from a disease in itself to a symptom of
investigations of the value of these clinical methods disease. Spectacular advances in physiology, pathology,
led to their widespread and enthusiastic adoption after pharmacology and the discovery of microbiology in the
he published his results in 1839. These advances helped latter half of the 19th century led to the development
lead to a change in the practice of medicine. Bedside of the new ‘clinical and laboratory medicine’, which
teaching was first introduced in the Renaissance by is the rapidly advancing medicine of the present day.
Montanus (1498–1552) in Padua in 1543. In the 17th The modern systematic approach to diagnosis, with
century, physicians based their opinion on a history which this book deals, is still, however, based on taking
provided by an apothecary (assistant) and rarely saw the history and examining the patient by looking
the patients themselves. Thomas Sydenham (1624–89) (inspecting), feeling (palpating), tapping (percussing)
began to practise more modern bedside medicine, and listening (auscultating).
basing his treatment on experience and not theory,
but it was not until a century later that the scientific Suggested reading
method brought a systematic approach to clinical Bordage G. Where are the history and the physical? Can Med Assoc J 1995;
diagnosis. 152:1595–1598.
This change began in the hospitals of Paris after the McDonald C. Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice. Ann
Intern Med 1996; 124:56–62.
French Revolution, with recognition of the work of Reiser SJ. The clinical record in medicine. Part I: Learning from cases. Ann Intern
Morgagni, Corvisart, Laënnec and others. Influenced by Med 1991; 114:902–907.
The Hippocratic oath
I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius, and will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners
Hygieia, and Panacea, and all the gods and goddesses of this work. Into whatever houses I enter I will go
that, according to my ability and judgment, I will keep into them for the benefit of the sick and will abstain
this Oath and this stipulation: To reckon him who from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption;
taught me this Art equally dear to me as my parents, to and further from the seduction of females or males,
share my substance with him and relieve his necessities of freemen and slaves. Whatever, in connection with
if required; to look upon his offspring in the same my professional practice, or not in connection with it,
footing as my own brother, and to teach them this Art, I may see or hear in the lives of men which ought not
if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation, to be spoken of abroad I will not divulge, as reckoning
and that by precept, lecture, and every other mode of that all such should be kept secret. While I continue
instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the Art to my to keep this Oath unviolated may it be granted to me
own sons and those of my teachers, and to disciples to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by
bound by a stipulation and oath according to the law of all men, in all times! But should I trespass and violate
medicine, but to none others. I will follow that system of this Oath, may the reverse be my lot!
regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, Hippocrates, born on the Island of Cos (c.460–357
I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain BC) is agreed by everyone to be the father of medicine.
from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will He is said to have lived to the age of 109. Many of the
give no deadly medicine to any if asked, nor suggest statements in this ancient oath remain relevant today,
any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give while others, such as euthanasia and abortion, remain
a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity controversial. The seduction of slaves, however, is less of
and with holiness I will pass my life and practise my a problem.
Art. I will not cut persons laboring under the stone, but
CHAPTER 1
The general principles of history taking
Medicine is learned by the bedside and not in the classroom. SIR WILLIAM OSLER (1849–1919)
An extensive knowledge of medical facts is not useful has abdominal pain, for example, will influence the
unless a doctor is able to extract accurate and succinct interpretation of the history. Remember that the history
information from a sick person about his or her illness, is the least-expensive way of making a diagnosis.
and then synthesise the data. This is how you make Changes in medical education mean that much
an accurate diagnosis. In all branches of medicine, the student teaching is now conducted away from the
development of a rational plan of management depends traditional hospital ward. Students must learn how
on a correct diagnosis or a sensible, differential diagnosis to take a medical history in any and every setting,
(list of possible diagnoses). Except for patients who but obviously adjustments to the technique must be
are extremely ill, taking a careful medical history should made for patients seen in busy surgeries or outpatient
precede both examination and treatment. departments. Much information about a patient’s
Taking the medical history is the first step in previous medical history may already be available in
making a diagnosis; it will be used to direct the hospital or clinic records (some regrettably inaccurately
physical examination and will usually determine what recorded, so be on your guard); the detail needed will
investigations are appropriate. More often than not, an vary depending on the complexity of the presenting
accurate history suggests the correct diagnosis, whereas problem and on whether the visit is a follow-up or a
the physical examination and subsequent investigations new consultation.
merely serve to confirm this impression.1,2 Text box 1.1
shows the consultation sequence.
Great diagnosticians have been feted by history T&O’C ESSENTIALS
and you will see their names live on in this book:
Hippocrates, Osler, Mayo, Addison and Cushing, All students must have a comprehensive
to name a few. History taking involves more than understanding of how to take a complete medical
listening: you must observe actively (a part of physical history, which is usually essential for accurate
examination). Noting the discomfort of a patient who diagnosis.
Successful doctors are able to imagine what it would must make a deliberate point of introducing him- or
be like to be in the position of the patient they are herself and explaining his or her role. A student might
treating. Ask yourself the question ‘How would I like say: ‘Good afternoon, Mrs Evans. My name is Jane
to be treated if I were this patient?’ Smith. I am Dr Osler’s medical student. She has asked
It is possible to be understanding and sympathetic me to come and see you.’ A patient seen at a clinic
about a patient’s illness and circumstances but retain should be asked to come and sit down, and be directed
objectivity. Doctors who can become overwhelmed to a chair. The door should be shut or, if the patient is
by their patients’ problems cannot look after them in the ward, the curtains drawn to provide some privacy.
properly.a The clinician should sit down beside or near the patient
Hospitals and clinics all have rules and suggestions so as to be close to eye level and give the impression
for students about how they should dress and identify that the interview will be an unhurried one.9,10
themselves, and whose permission they need to see It is important here to address the patient respectfully,
patients on wards. Make sure you are familiar with look at him or her (not the computer) and use his or
these rather than face ejection from the ward by a her name and title (see Fig. 1.1). Some general remarks
senior doctor or (more frightening) nurse.b about the weather, hospital food or the crowded waiting
Remember that patients tell doctors and even
medical students facts they would tell no one else. It
is essential that these matters be kept confidential except
when shared for clinical reasons and in accordance
with privacy legislation. There should be no problem
in discussing a patient with a colleague, but unless the
colleague is directly involved in the patient’s management
the patient should not be identified. This applies to
discussion of patients and their results at clinical
meetings. In open meetings, the patient’s name should
be removed from displayed tests and documents.
There is no doubt that the treatment of a patient
begins the moment one reaches the bedside or the
patient enters the consulting rooms. The patient’s
first impressions of a doctor’s professional manner
a
will have a lasting effect. One of the axioms of the
medical profession is primum non nocere (first, do
no harm).4 An unkind and thoughtless approach to
questioning and examining a patient can cause harm
before any treatment has had the opportunity to do so.
You should aim to leave the patient feeling better for
your visit.
Much has been written about the correct way to
interview patients, but each doctor has to develop his
or her own method, guided by experience gained from
clinical teachers and patients themselves.5–8 To help
establish this good relationship, the student or doctor
a
Remember; ‘the patient is the one with the disease’, from the infamous (a) Interviewing correctly. (b) Interviewing
House of God by Samuel Shem. incorrectly
b
Many hospitals have banned ties and long sleeves for their staff so as to
prevent the spread of infection. Who knows where this trend for less and FIGURE 1.1
less clothing may end?
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 5
room may be appropriate to help put the patient at and the past history as a series of ‘inactive’ or ‘still
ease, but these must not be patronising. active’ problems.
A sick patient will sometimes emphasise irrelevant
facts and forget about very important symptoms. For
this reason, a systematic approach to history taking and
OBTAINING THE HISTORY recording is crucial.11 List 1.1 outlines a history-taking
Start with an open-ended question and listen actively—
patients will ‘tell you the diagnosis’ if you take the time
to listen to the story in their own words and synthesise
what they are saying based on your knowledge of HISTORY-TAKING SEQUENCE
pathophysiology. 1. Presenting (principal) symptom (PS)
Allow the patient to tell the story first and avoid 2. History of the presenting illness (HPI)
the almost overwhelming urge to interrupt. Encourage Details of current illnesses
the patient to continue telling you about his or her Details of previous similar episodes
main problem or problems from the beginning. Then Extent of functional disability
ask specific questions to fill in all the gaps.
Effect of the illness
At the end of the history and examination, a detailed
3. Drug and treatment history
record is made. However, many clinicians find it useful
Current treatment
to make rough notes during the interview. Tell patients
you will be doing this but will also be listening to them. Drug history (dose, duration, indication, side
effects): prescription, over-the-counter and
With practice, note taking can be done without any alternative therapies
loss of rapport. Pausing to make a note of a patient’s Past treatments
answer to a question and engaging his or her eyes
Drug allergies or reactions
directly can help, and indicates that the story is being
4. Past history (PH)
taken seriously.
Past illnesses
Many clinics and hospitals use computer records,
which may be displayed on a computer screen on the Surgical operations (dates, indication,
procedure)
desk. Notes are sometimes added to these during the
Menstrual and reproductive history for
interview via a keyboard. It can be very off-putting for women
a patient when the interviewing doctor looks entirely
Immunisations
at the computer screen rather than at the patient. With
Blood transfusions (and dates)
practice it is possible to enter data while maintaining
5. Social history (SH)
eye contact with a patient, but at first it is probably
preferable to make written notes and transcribe or Upbringing and education level
dictate them later. Marital status, social support, living
conditions and financial situation
The final record must be a sequential, accurate
account of the development and course of the illness Diet and exercise
or illnesses of the patient (see Ch 50). There are a Occupation and hobbies
number of methods of recording this information. Overseas travel (where and when)
Hospitals may have printed forms with spaces for Smoking and alcohol use
recording specific information. This applies especially Analgesic and illicit (street) drug use
to routine admissions (e.g. for minor surgical Mood and sexual history
procedures). Follow-up consultation questions and 6. Family history (FH)
notes will be briefer than those of the initial consultation; 7. Systems review (SR)
obviously, many questions are relevant only for the See Questions box 1.1 on pages 9–12
initial consultation. When a patient is seen repeatedly Also refer to Chapter 50.
at a clinic or in a general practice setting, the current
LIST 1.1
presenting history may be listed as an ‘active’ problem
6 SECTION 1 The general principles of history taking and physical examination
sequence, but the detail required depends on the When a patient stops volunteering information,
complexity of the presenting illness. the question ‘What else?’ will usually help start the
conversation up again, and can be repeated several
times if necessary.8 On the other hand, some direction
INTRODUCTORY QUESTIONS may be necessary to keep a garrulous patient on track
In order to obtain a thorough history the clinician later during the interview.
must establish a good relationship, interview in a It is necessary to ask specific questions to test
logical manner, listen carefully, interrupt appropriately diagnostic hypotheses. For example, the patient may
and usually only after allowing the patient to tell the not have noticed an association between the occurrence
initial story, note non-verbal clues and correctly of chest discomfort and exercise (typical of angina)
interpret the information obtained. unless asked specifically. It may also be helpful to give
The next step after introducing oneself should be a list of possible answers. A patient with suspected
to find out the patient’s major symptoms or medical angina who is unable to describe the symptom may
problems. Asking the patient ‘What brought you here be asked whether the sensation is sharp, dull, heavy
today?’ can be unwise, as it often promotes the reply or burning. The reply that it is sharp makes angina
‘an ambulance’ or ‘a car’. This little joke wears thin after less likely.
some years in clinical practice. It is best to attempt a Appropriate (but not exaggerated) reassuring gestures
conversational approach and ask the patient ‘What has are of value to maintain the flow of conversation. If
been the trouble or problem recently?’ or ‘When were the patient stops giving the story spontaneously, it
you last quite well?’ or ‘What made you come to the can be useful to provide a short summary of what
hospital (or clinic) today?’ For a follow-up consultation has already been said and encourage him or her to
some reference to the last visit is appropriate, for continue.
example: ‘How have things been going since I saw you The clinician must learn to listen with an open
last?’ or ‘It’s been about … weeks since I saw you last, mind.10 The temptation to leap to a diagnostic decision
isn’t it? What’s been happening since then?’ This lets the before the patient has had the chance to describe all
patient know the clinician hasn’t forgotten him or her. the symptoms in his or her own words should be
Some have suggested that the clinician begin with resisted. Avoid using pseudo-medical terms and if the
questions about more general aspects of the patient’s patient uses them then find out exactly what is meant
life. There is a danger that this attempt to establish early by them, as misinterpretation of medical terms is
rapport will seem intrusive to a person who has come common.
for help about a specific problem, albeit one related to Patients’ descriptions of their symptoms may
other aspects of life. This type of general and personal vary as they are subjected to repeated questioning by
information may be better approached once the clinician increasingly senior medical staff. The patient who has
has shown an interest in the presenting problem or as described his chest pain as sharp and left-sided to the
part of the social history—usually intrusive questions medical student may tell the registrar that the pain is
should be deferred to a subsequent consultation when dull and in the centre of his chest. These discrepancies
the patient and clinician know each other better. The come as no surprise to experienced clinicians; they are
best approach and timing of this part of the interview sometimes the result of the patient having had time
will vary, depending on the nature of the presenting to reflect on his or her symptoms. This does mean,
problem and the patient’s and clinician’s attitude. however, that very important aspects of the story should
be checked by asking follow-up questions, such as: ‘Can
T&O’C ESSENTIALS you show me exactly where the pain is?’ and ‘What do
you mean by sharp?’
Encourage patients to tell their story in their own Some patients may have medical problems that
words from the onset of the first symptom to the make the interview difficult for them; these include
present time. Find out the full details of each deafness and problems with speech and memory. These
problem and document them. must be recognised by the clinician if the interview is
to be successful. See Chapter 2 for more details.
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 7
PRESENTING (PRINCIPAL) which some are interdependent and some not. In the
older person, multiple problems are the rule, not the
SYMPTOM exception. Your job is to identify them all accurately
Not uncommonly, a patient has many symptoms. An and create a full medical picture of the individual.
attempt must be made to decide which symptom led
the patient to present. It must be remembered that the Current symptoms
patient’s and the doctor’s ideas of what constitutes a
Certain information should routinely be sought for
serious problem may differ. A patient with symptoms
each current symptom if this hasn’t been volunteered
of a cold who also, in passing, mentions that he has
by the patient. The mnemonic SOCRATES summarises
recently coughed up blood (haemoptysis) may need
the questions that should be asked about most
more attention to his chest than to his nose. Find
symptoms:
out what problem or symptom most concerns the
patient. Patients are unlikely to be satisfied with their S ite
consultation if the issue that troubles them the most O nset
is not dealt with, even if it is a minor problem for C haracter
which reassurance is all that is required. Record each R adiation (if the symptom is pain or
presenting symptom or symptoms in the patient’s own discomfort)
words, avoiding technical terms at this stage. A lleviating factors
Whenever you identify a major complaint or T iming
symptom, think of the following as you are trying to E xacerbating factors
unravel the story and ask questions to try to find out:
S everity.
1. Where is the problem? (Probable anatomical
diagnosis) Site
2. What is the nature of the symptom? (Likely
Ask where the symptom is exactly and whether it is
pathological diagnosis)
localised or diffuse. Ask the patient to point to the
3. How does it affect the patient? (Physiological and actual site on the body.
functional diagnosis) Some symptoms are not localised. Patients who
4. Why did the patient develop it? (Aetiological complain of dizziness do not localise this to any
diagnosis) particular site—but vertigo may sometimes involve a
A diagnosis is not just about a name; you are trying feeling of movement within the head and to that extent
to determine the likely disease process so that you can is localised. Other symptoms that are not localised
advise the patient of the prognosis and plan management. include cough, shortness of breath (dyspnoea) and
change in weight.
HISTORY OF THE Onset (mode of onset and pattern)
PRESENTING ILLNESS Find out whether the symptom came on rapidly,
Each of the presenting problems has to be talked about gradually or instantaneously. Some cardiac arrhythmias
in detail with the patient, but in the first part of the are of instantaneous onset and offset. Sudden loss of
interview the patient should lead the discussion. In consciousness (syncope) with immediate recovery
the second part the doctor should take more control occurs with cardiac but not neurological disease. Ask
and ask specific questions. When writing down the whether the symptom has been present continuously
history of the presenting illness, the events should be or intermittently. Find out whether the symptom is
placed in chronological order; this might have to be getting worse or better, and, if so, when the change
done later when the whole history has been obtained. occurred. For example, the exertional breathlessness
If numerous systems are affected, the events should of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may
be placed in chronological order for each system. come on with less and less activity as it worsens. Find
Remember, patients may have multiple problems, of out what the patient was doing at the time the symptom
8 SECTION 1 The general principles of history taking and physical examination
began. For example, severe breathlessness that wakes normal activities or sleep. Severity can be graded from
a patient from sleep is very suggestive of cardiac failure. mild to very severe. A mild symptom can be ignored
by the patient, whereas a moderate symptom cannot be
Character ignored but does not interfere with daily activities. A
Here it is necessary to ask the patient what is meant severe symptom interferes with daily activities, whereas
by the symptom, to describe its character. If the patient a very severe symptom markedly interferes with most
complains of dizziness, does this mean the room spins activities. Alternatively, pain or discomfort can be
around (vertigo) or is it more a feeling of impending graded on a 10-point scale from 0 (no discomfort) to
loss of consciousness? Does indigestion mean abdominal 10 (unbearable). (However, asking patients who are in
pain, heartburn, fullness after eating, excess wind or severe pain to provide a number out of 10 seems at
a change in bowel habit? If there is pain, is it sharp, best a distraction and at worst rather unkind.) A face
dull, stabbing, boring, burning or cramp-like? scale using pictures of different faces to represent pain
severity from no pain (0) to very much pain (10) can
Radiation of pain or discomfort be useful in practice.12
Determine whether the symptom, if localised, radiates; A number of other methods of quantifying pain
this mainly applies if the symptom is pain. Certain are available (e.g. the visual analogue scale, whereby
patterns of radiation are typical of a condition or even the patient is asked to mark the severity of pain on a
diagnostic, for example the nerve root distribution of 10-centimetre horizontal line). Note that all of these
pain associated with herpes zoster (shingles). scales are more useful for comparing the subjective
severity of pain over time than for absolute severity—for
Alleviating factors example, comparing before and after a certain treatment
has been started.
Ask whether anything makes the symptom better. For
The severity of some symptoms can be quantified
example, the pain of pericarditis may be relieved when
more precisely; for example, shortness of breath on
a patient sits up, whereas heartburn from acid reflux
exertion occurring after walking 10 metres on flat
may be relieved by drinking milk or taking an antacid.
ground is more severe than shortness of breath
Have analgesic medications been used to control the
occurring after walking 90 metres up a hill. Central
pain? Have narcotics been required?
chest pain from angina occurring at rest is more
Timing significant than angina occurring while running 90
metres to catch a bus.
Find out when the symptom first began and try to date It is relevant to quantify the severity of each
this as accurately as possible. For example, ask the symptom—but also to remember that symptoms that
patient what the first thing was that he or she noticed a patient considers mild may be very significant.
was ‘unusual’ or ‘wrong’. Ask whether the patient has
had a similar illness in the past. It is often helpful to
ask patients when they last felt entirely well. In a patient
with long-standing symptoms, ask why he or she Associated symptoms
decided to see the doctor at this time. Here an attempt is made to uncover in a systematic
way those symptoms that might be expected to be
Exacerbating factors associated with disease of a particular area. Initial
Ask whether anything makes the symptom worse. The and most thorough attention must be given to the
slightest movement may exacerbate the abdominal pain system that includes the presenting problem (see
of peritonitis or the pain in the big toe caused by gout. Questions box 1.1). Remember that, although a
single symptom may provide the clue that leads to
Severity the correct diagnosis, usually it is the combination of
This is subjective. The best way to assess severity is to characteristic symptoms that most reliably suggests the
ask the patient whether the symptom interferes with diagnosis.
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 9
QUESTIONS BOX
Cardiovascular system
1. Have you had any pain or pressure in your chest, neck or arm? (Myocardial ischaemia)
2. Are you short of breath on exertion? How much exertion is necessary?
3. Have you ever woken up at night short of breath? (Cardiac failure)
4. Can you lie flat without feeling breathless?
5. Have you had swelling of your ankles?
6. Have you noticed your heart racing or beating irregularly?
! 7. Have you had blackouts without warning? (Stokes–Adams attacks)
! 8. Have you felt dizzy or blacked out when exercising? (Severe aortic stenosis or hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy)
9. Do you have pain in your legs on exercise?
10. Do you have cold or blue hands or feet?
11. Have you ever had rheumatic fever, a heart attack or high blood pressure?
Respiratory system
1. Are you ever short of breath? Has this come on suddenly? (Pulmonary embolism)
2. Have you had any cough?
3. Is your cough associated with shivers and shakes (rigors) and breathlessness and chest pain?
(Pneumonia)
4. Do you cough up anything?
! 5. Have you coughed up blood? (Bronchial carcinoma)
6. What type of work have you done? (Occupational lung disease)
7. Do you snore loudly? Do you fall asleep easily during the day? When? Have you fallen asleep
while driving? Obtain a sleep history.
8. Do you ever have wheezing when you are short of breath?
9. Have you had fevers?
10. Do you have night sweats?
11. Have you ever had pneumonia or tuberculosis?
12. Have you had a recent chest X-ray?
Continued
10 SECTION 1 The general principles of history taking and physical examination
Gastrointestinal system
1. Are you troubled by indigestion? What do you mean by indigestion?
2. Do you have heartburn?
! 3. Have you had any difficulty swallowing? (Oesophageal cancer)
! 4. Have you had vomiting, or vomited blood? (Gastrointestinal bleeding)
5. Have you had pain or discomfort in your abdomen?
6. Have you had any abdominal bloating or distension?
7. Has your bowel habit changed recently? (Carcinoma of the colon)
8. How many bowel motions a week do you usually pass?
9. Have you lost control of your bowels or had accidents? (Faecal incontinence)
! 10. Have you seen blood in your motions? (Gastrointestinal bleeding)
! 11. Have your bowel motions been black? (Gastrointestinal bleeding)
! 12. Have you lost weight recently without dieting? (Malignancy)
13. Have your eyes or skin ever been yellow?
14. Have you ever had hepatitis, peptic ulceration, colitis or bowel cancer?
15. Tell me (briefly) about your diet recently.
Genitourinary system
1. Do you have difficulty or pain on passing urine?
2. Is your urine stream as good as it used to be?
3. Is there a delay before you start to pass urine? (Applies mostly to men)
4. Is there dribbling at the end?
5. Do you have to get up at night to pass urine?
6. Are you passing larger or smaller amounts of urine?
7. Has the urine colour changed?
! 8. Have you seen blood in your urine? (Urinary tract malignancy)
9. Have you any problems with your sex life? Difficulty obtaining or maintaining an erection?
10. Have you noticed any rashes or lumps on your genitals?
11. Have you ever had a sexually transmitted disease?
12. Have you ever had a urinary tract infection or kidney stone?
Haematological system
1. Do you bruise easily?
2. Have you had fevers, or shivers and shakes (rigors)?
! 3. Do you have difficulty stopping a small cut from bleeding? (Bleeding disorder)
! 4. Have you noticed any lumps under your arms, or in your neck or groin? (Haematological
malignancy)
5. Have you ever had blood clots in your legs or in the lungs?
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 11
Endocrine system
1. Have you noticed any swelling in your neck?
2. Do your hands tremble?
3. Do you prefer hot or cold weather?
4. Have you had a thyroid problem or diabetes?
5. Have you noticed increased sweating?
6. Have you been troubled by fatigue?
7. Have you noticed any change in your appearance, hair, skin or voice?
8. Have you been unusually thirsty lately? Or lost weight? (New onset of diabetes)
BOX 1.1
The effect of the illness by colour or size rather than by name and dose.c Then
ask the patient to show you all his or her medications
A serious illness can change a person’s life—for example,
(see Fig. 1.2), if possible, and list them. Note the dose,
a chronic illness may prevent work or further education.
length of use, indication for each drug and any side
The psychological and physical effects of a serious health
effects.
problem may be devastating and, of course, people
This drug list may provide a useful clue to chronic
respond differently to similar problems. Even after full
or past illnesses, otherwise forgotten. For example, a
recovery from a life-threatening illness, some people
patient who denies a history of high blood pressure
may be permanently affected by loss of confidence or
may remember when asked why he or she is taking an
self-esteem. There may be continuing anxieties about
antihypertensive drug having an elevated blood pressure
the capability of supporting a family. Try to find out
in the past. Remember that some drugs are prescribed
how the patient and his or her family have been affected.
as transdermal patches or subcutaneous implants (e.g.
How has the patient coped so far, and what are the
contraceptives and hormonal treatment of carcinoma
expectations and hopes for the future with regard to
of the prostate). Ask whether the drugs were taken as
health? What explanations of the condition has the
prescribed. Always ask specifically whether a woman
patient been given or obtained (e.g. from the internet)?
is taking the contraceptive pill, because many who take
Helping a patient to manage ill-health is a large
it do not consider it a medicine or tablet. The same is
part of the clinician’s duty. This depends on sympathetic
true of inhalers, or what many patients call their ‘puffers’.
and realistic explanations of the probable future course
To remind the patient, it is often worthwhile to ask
of the disease and the effects of treatment.
about the use of classes of drugs. A basic list should
DRUG AND TREATMENT include questions about treatment for:
• blood pressure
HISTORY • high cholesterol
Ask the patient whether he or she is currently taking
any tablets or medicines (the use of the word ‘drug’ c
If you ask a patient what size a tablet is (meaning how many milligrams)
may cause alarm); the patient will often describe these a common answer will be, ‘Oh it is quite small’.
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 13
a b
(a) Medications packed for hospital discharge. (b) A Webster packet; medications packed
for the patient by the pharmacy by time and day of the week
FIGURE 1.2
these are a relevant part of their medical history, but past blood transfusion (including when and what for).
these chemicals, like any drug, may have adverse effects. Serious or chronic childhood illnesses may have
Indeed, some have been found to be adulterated with interfered with a child’s education and social activities
drugs such as steroids and NSAIDs. More information like sport. Ask what the patient remembers and thinks
about these substances and their effects is becoming about this.
available and there is an increasing responsibility for Previous illnesses or operations may have a direct
clinicians to be aware of them and to ask about them bearing on current health. It is worth asking specifically
directly. about certain operations that have a continuing effect
Ask (where relevant—not the 90-year-old nursing on the patient—for example, operations for malignancy,
home resident) about ‘recreational’ or street drug use bowel surgery or cardiac surgery, especially valve
(vide infra). The use of intravenous drugs has many surgery. Implanted prostheses are common in surgical,
implications for the patient’s health. Ask whether any orthopaedic and cardiac procedures. These may involve
attempt has been made to avoid sharing needles. This may a risk of infection of the foreign body, whereas magnetic
protect against the injection of viruses, but not against metals—especially most cardiac pacemakers—are a
bacterial infection from the use of impure substances. contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Cocaine use has become a common cause of myocardial Chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be a contraindication
infarction in young people in some countries. Acutely to X-rays using iodine contrast materials and MRI
ill patients may have taken overdoses of drugs whose scanning using gadolinium contrast. Pregnancy is
purity has been underestimated (especially narcotics) usually a contraindication to radiation exposure (X-
or taken drugs without knowing what they are. The use rays and nuclear scans—remember that computed
of amphetamine-like drugs at parties can be associated tomography [CT] scans cause hundreds of times the
with dehydration with electrolyte abnormalities and radiation exposure of simple X-rays).
psychotic symptoms. Here an attempt to find out The patient may believe that he or she has had
more detail from the patient or other party-goers is a particular diagnosis made in the past, but careful
essential. questioning may reveal this as unlikely. For example,
Not all medical problems are treated with drugs. the patient may mention a previous duodenal ulcer,
Ask about courses of physiotherapy or rehabilitation but not have had any investigations or treatment for
for musculoskeletal problems or injuries, or to help it, which makes the diagnosis less certain. Therefore, it
recovery following surgery or a severe illness. Certain is important to obtain the particulars of each relevant
gastrointestinal conditions are treated with dietary past illness, including the symptoms experienced, tests
supplements (e.g. pancreatic enzymes for chronic performed and treatments prescribed. The mature
pancreatitis) or restrictions (e.g. avoidance of gluten clinician needs to maintain an objective scepticism
for coeliac disease). about the information that is obtained from the
patient.
Patients with chronic illnesses may have had their
PAST HISTORY condition managed with the help of various doctors
Some patients may feel that questions about past and at specialised clinics. For example, patients with
problems and the more general questions asked in the diabetes mellitus are often managed by a team of health
systems review (p 19) are somewhat intrusive. It may professionals including diabetic educators, nurses and
be best to preface these questions by saying something dietitians. Find out what supervision and treatment
like, ‘I need to ask you some questions about your past these have provided. For example, who does the patient
medical problems and general health. These may affect contact if there is a problem with the insulin dose, and
your current investigations and treatment.’ does the patient know what to do (an action plan) if
Ask the patient whether he or she has had any there is an urgent or a dangerous complication? Patients
serious illnesses, operations or admissions to hospital with chronic diseases are often very much involved in
in the past, including any obstetric or gynaecological their own care and are very well informed about aspects
problems. Where relevant obtain the details. Do not of their treatment. For example, diabetics should keep
forget to enquire about childhood illnesses. Ask about records of their home-measured blood sugar levels,
CHAPTER 1 The general principles of history taking 15
specificity), but the screening often misses unhealthy • 4 or more for men (86% sensitivity, 89%
alcohol use. specificity).22
A more useful screening test to identify unhealthy
An even simpler screening question is to ask, ‘How
drinking comprises three simple questions (AUDIT-C):
many times in the past year have you had 5 (for men;
1. How often do you have a drink containing
4 for women) or more drinks in a day?’ A score of over
alcohol? 0 (or ‘I don’t remember’) suggests alcohol use in the
2. How many drinks containing alcohol do you unhealthy range. This question performs almost as well
have on a typical day when you are drinking as the AUDIT-C screening.23
alcohol? The complications of alcohol abuse are summarised
3. How often do you have 6 or more alcoholic in List 1.3.
drinks on one occasion?
Each question is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (4 or more
times per week). Positive scores for unhealthy (excess) Analgesics and street drugs
drinking are: Over-the-counter analgesics can cause harm—for
• 3 or more for women (73% sensitivity, 91% example, if an alcoholic has just a bit too much
specificity) paracetamol it may lead to acute liver failure.
Preparing a family tree: note the symbols used for the documentation
FIGURE 1.3
— Täytyykö minun…?
— Ja sinä tulit minua vastaan, niinkö? Olitpa sinä hyvä. Minä olen
katunut sitä tämänaamuista. Olisinhan luvannutkin tyttöni kaskeen…
Ja eräänä päivänä hän tulikin Hakalaan, kun Liisa oli yksin kotona.
Liisa ajoi ulos löyhkä-Annan ja alkoi itkeä. Hän tiesi että Anna
puhui kylällä kuulemiaan, mutta se koskikin sen vuoksi kaikista
kipeimmin. Hän tiesi kyläläisten ja Hanneksen kylmät välit ja etteivät
puoletkaan puheista olleet totta, mutta sittenkin… Hän oli taas
saanut sysäyksen, joka herätti kiusaavat ajatukset.
— Ehkäpä on…
*****
— Tulenhan toki.
Silloin kun synkät varjot olivat painavina kodin yllä, tunsi Hannes
sisäistä tarvetta puhua jonkun kanssa. Se oli keventämisen kaipuuta
ja vanha Tuomas oli hänen uskottunsa, jonka kanssa oli hyvä puhua.
Tuomaalla oli omat omituiset päätelmänsä, joista sai kevennystä.
*****
Koko pitäjän väki oli siis häntä vastaan. Mistä syystä? Siitäkö
ehkä, että hän oli kasvattanut itsensä mieheksi, ottanut
perintömaansa omiin käsiinsä ja eli hyvin työstään?
Hanneksen oli tehnyt mieli kysyä, mitä hän oli rikkonut heitä
vastaan, mutta tyytyi alakuloisena allapäin istumaan.
Hannes vaikeni. Hän arvasi, että oli ollut taas hänen poissa
ollessaan samaa kuin ennenkin ja palvelijat lähtivät heti.
Mikä lienee ollut syynä, ettei ruoka tuntunut tällä kertaa maistuvan.
Työväki vaikeni. Niinkuin painajainen olisi astunut näkymättömänä
tupaan.
— Se tietää onnettomuutta.
— Sitten, jos sinä kerran käyt siellä, tuli hiljaa Liisalta, mutta
Hannes huomasi kaksi kyyneltä hänen punehtuvilla poskillaan.
— Kyllä minä sitten koetan, kun sinä tahdot, sanoi Liisa hiljaa. Kun
väin sinä olet luonani.
— Mennään siis.