Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E 5 e 7187 Fad 0 A 5 Aa 2 C 7 Eb
E 5 e 7187 Fad 0 A 5 Aa 2 C 7 Eb
E 5 e 7187 Fad 0 A 5 Aa 2 C 7 Eb
Cedar Schumacher
Mr. Smith
H 11 ELA
24 April 2024
Wealth and love are some of the most ubiquitous themes in literature as well as more
modern media, largely due to their relatability across all walks of life and the constancy of these
topics in society. Read in hundreds of high school classes, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby
examines these themes through the perspective of an incredibly affluent man and his
relationships with others, society, and himself. In the film adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s
iconic 1925 novel The Great Gatsby, Gatsby’s identity is defined almost entirely by his immense
wealth as well as his obsession over Daisy, in an almost ‘fairy-tale’ manner. This contrasts with
the original book, which represents Gatsby in a less saturated, more believable frame that is more
grounded in reality.
One of the key differences between the book and film lies in the portrayal of Gatsby’s
relationship with Daisy, the woman he has been pining over for 5 years. In the film, Daisy’s
obsession over her. In the book, however, Daisy is treated as a much more individual person, and
her relationships with people other than Gatsby are given more significance, which serves to
de-emphasise her relationship with Gatsby. In the movie, Daisy is represented in many scenes by
the green beacon at the end of her dock. Since the sight of this beacon is something that Gatsby
has almost worshiped, as it represents Daisy to him, the beacon is used as a repeating motif
throughout the film. The distinctive green hue and the accompanying soft ringing sound of the
Schumacher 2
beacon serve as a constant reminder of Gatsby’s true priorities throughout the film. To
underscore this point, the beacon is even shown in the very first shot of the first scene of the
movie, establishing Daisy herself as one of the driving forces in the plot. In contrast to this,
Fitzgerald’s original book doesn’t solidly establish the significance of the beacon until the
seventy-second page. Additionally, the book represents Daisy’s relationship with Tom more
positively and concretely than the movie, stating, “I thought I’d never seen a girl so mad about
her husband….She used to sit on the sand with his head in her lap by the hour, rubbing her
fingers over his eyes and looking at him with unfathomable delight. It was touching to see them
together — it made you laugh in a hushed, fascinated way” (Fitzgerald 60-pdf). The overarching
impact of these differences between the book and film is that the print portrayal of Gatsby lacks
much of the obsessiveness that defines his cinematic self. In the movie, Gatsby and Daisy seem
to reunite with very little friction, and their relationship is consistently emphasized through the
metaphor of the omnipresent green light. This emphasis largely overshadows Daisy and Tom’s
marriage, which has its dysfunction very deliberately laid bare. Conversely, the book not only
reduces the green light to a borderline inconsequential detail, it also places much more
significance on Tom and Daisy’s relationship - even so far as to describe them in an undeniably
sentimental, concretely romantic fashion. This serves to undermine the possibility of Daisy and
Gatsby ending up together, since how can they live ‘happily ever after’ as Gatsby desires, if
Daisy is firmly married to Tom? This point even moreso highlights some of the intrinsic thematic
differences between the book and film - when onscreen, Gatsby’s story almost comes across as a
fairy tale of sorts, a decorated, affluent man waiting patiently for his one true love to return from
her evil husband, whereas the novel in many ways blurs these staunch character roles, it allows
the reader to see the positives in Tom and Daisy's relationship, as well as the inherent unrealism
Schumacher 3
of Gatsby’s own supreme philosophy. In film, Gatsby and Daisy’s relationship is significantly
saturated and over-emphasized when compared to the book, through the extensive presence of
metaphors in the film, and the emphasis on Daisy's existing marriage in the novel.
In addition to Daisy, Gatsby’s other primary defining feature is his staggering wealth - his
incredible affluence even grants him annual Christmas cards from the New York commissioner.
In a similar manner to the increased intensity of Daisy’s presence in the film, Gatsby’s cinematic
portrayal also sports his wealth in a much more fantastical and hard-to-buy fashion than in the
novel, where his prosperity is much more moderately and realistically displayed through the
inclusion of logistical details. In the movie, almost every single shot exhibits almost
inconceivable wealth, but this effect is truly driven home by the several party scenes. Gatsby is
famous across New York for his immense, spectacular parties, and the film does not shy away
from the appearance of these galas - in fact, the party scenes are perhaps the most famous shots
of the movie. These sections of the film are incredibly saturated both literally, through deliberate
color grading, and metaphorically, due to the overwhelming intensity of the scenes. These
spectacles cross over easily into the realm of cartoonishness, featuring people rolling on the
ground in tuxedos as they exit their glittering automobiles, wedged into Gatsby’s overcrowded
driveway. The undeniable production of these scenes ultimately gives the entire affair a hazy,
detached feeling akin almost to a fever dream. Additionally, the use of contemporary music
which would obviously not have been available in the 1920’s only adds to the scene’s undeniable
feeling of disreality, as the insistent bassline and kick serve as an almost metaphorical heartbeat
to the party. In rather stark contrast to this menagerie, the original novel takes a much more
practical approach to Gatsby’s infamous parties. To this end, it is described how, “Every Friday
five crates of oranges and lemons arrived from a fruiterer in New York…At least once a fortnight
Schumacher 4
a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to
make a Christmas tree of Gatsby’s enormous garden….By seven o’clock the orchestra has
arrived…” (Fitzgerald 32-pdf). Although this may seem insignificant in the grand scheme of the
novel, especially considering that it includes several of its own party scenes, which are suitably
opulent, the inclusion of practical information such as this goes a long way in grounding the
scene. The movie scenes feel strikingly detached, almost floating in time in space, as though
unbeholden to the laws of nature, economics, or logistics. The same scenes, when shown in the
novel, are given that crucial sense of reality by the admission that yes, Gatsby has to order food
for these galas - food which has to be delivered and prepared. Not only that, but the music and
decorations don’t just magically pop out of the foliage, either - arrangements have been made to
set these things up ahead of time. Although the movie contains its own scene or two describing
party logistics, these take place well into the second half of the movie, after every actual party
scene, therefore not impacting the audience perception of the actual events. However, the book
includes the description of the necessary coordination before any actual party takes place, which
grounds the entire premise in reality even before it starts. When these effects are taken in
together, the result is a conclusion similar to that of the Daisy situation - the book simply
portrays Gatsby and his life in a more realistic, grounded fashion, whereas the film easily strays
from the realm of reality into scenes that feel disconnected and overly improbable. This strongly
corroborates the trend found in the previous paragraph concerning the portrayal of Daisy, and
how the movie can feel almost ‘fairy-tale-ish’ at times. As a whole, the movie exhibits Gatsby’s
wealth in a very spectacular, yet unrealistic manner, while the book, by including organizational
details about the parties, grounds his wealth, making it appear much more believable.
Schumacher 5
The Great Gatsby has been reproduced several times, including most famously the 2013
film adaptation of the original 1925 novel, as well as of course the novel itself, a staple of
century-old story, the film adaptation of Fitzgerald’s novel differs in many significant ways in its
portrayal of The Great Gatsby himself. When these effects are all taken together, the summative
impact is the clearly more grounded and realistic style the novel takes when compared to the
film, which takes a more abstract, almost ‘storybook’ approach, which may translate well
through a cinematic format, but nonetheless only reduces the believability of the adaptation of F.