Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Doll's House Revision
A Doll's House Revision
1. Living a Lie:
○ Nora’s Deception: Nora’s life is built on lies and secrets, from her forgery to
her manipulation of Torvald. Her deceit is a means of survival in a patriarchal
society but ultimately becomes a barrier to genuine relationships.
○ Torvald’s Illusions: Torvald’s idealised view of Nora and their marriage is
based on his own self-deception. He is more concerned with appearances
and societal approval than the truth of their relationship.
2. Revelation and Liberation:
○ The Unmasking: The play’s climax involves the unmasking of truths, leading
to a dramatic confrontation between Nora and Torvald. This revelation forces
both characters to confront the reality of their lives and their relationship.
○ Nora’s Awakening: The truth sets Nora free, allowing her to see her life and
marriage clearly. Her decision to leave is an act of liberation and a rejection of
the deceit that has defined her life.
1. Societal Pressures:
○ Conformity vs. Self-Expression: Nora’s struggle represents the conflict
between individual desires and societal expectations. The play critiques the
pressures to conform to social norms, particularly for women.
○ Judgment and Reputation: The importance of social reputation and the fear
of judgement are significant themes. Torvald’s concern for his reputation
highlights how societal pressures can dictate personal decisions.
2. Breaking Free:
○ Nora’s Rebellion: Nora’s departure from her home is a radical act of
rebellion against societal constraints. It symbolises the pursuit of personal
freedom and the rejection of oppressive norms.
○ Challenging Norms: The play encourages questioning and challenging
societal norms, advocating for the right to individual self-expression and
autonomy.
Main Characters:
Nora Helmer:
1. Protagonist:
○ Transformation: Nora undergoes significant transformation from a seemingly
naive and submissive wife to an assertive and independent individual. Her
character arc is central to the play’s themes of self-discovery and liberation.
○ Symbol of Feminism: Nora represents the struggle for female emancipation.
Her journey highlights the limitations imposed on women by societal
expectations and the courage required to break free.
2. Complexity:
○ Manipulative yet Innocent: Nora’s character is complex; she is both
manipulative and innocent. Her actions are driven by a mix of survival
instincts and genuine affection, making her a multifaceted character.
○ Inner Strength: Despite her initial appearance, Nora possesses inner
strength and resilience. Her decision to leave Torvald demonstrates her
courage and determination to find her true self.
Torvald Helmer:
1. Antagonist:
○ Patriarchal Figure: Torvald embodies the patriarchal attitudes of the time.
His condescending treatment of Nora and obsession with social status
highlight the oppressive nature of traditional gender roles.
○ Control and Authority: Torvald’s need to control and dominate his
household reflects his belief in male superiority. His authority is challenged by
Nora’s ultimate decision to leave.
2. Hypocrisy:
○ Superficial Love: Torvald’s love for Nora is superficial, based more on her
role as a trophy wife than on genuine affection. His reaction to her deceit
reveals his selfishness and lack of true compassion.
○ Societal Conformity: Torvald’s actions are heavily influenced by societal
expectations. His concern for appearances and reputation often overrides his
personal relationships.
Dr. Rank:
1. Foil to Torvald:
○ Genuine Affection: Dr. Rank’s genuine affection for Nora contrasts with
Torvald’s superficial love. His honesty and acceptance of his fate provide a
stark contrast to the deceit and denial present in the Helmers’ marriage.
○ Unrequited Love: Dr. Rank’s unspoken love for Nora adds a layer of
complexity to his character. His presence highlights the lack of true emotional
connection in Nora’s marriage.
2. Symbol of Mortality:
○ Illness and Death: Dr. Rank’s terminal illness serves as a reminder of
mortality and the inevitability of death. His condition and open
acknowledgment of his impending death stand in contrast to the Helmers’
denial and avoidance of unpleasant truths.
Krogstad: