Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capital Punishment Response
Capital Punishment Response
Capital Punishment Response
214402531
Law and Criminal Psychology
Weekly Response
Weekly Response
Capital punishment refers to the execution of an offender who has been sentenced to
death after conviction by of court of law for a criminal offence. This term should be distin-
guished from extrajudicial executions, which are carried out without due process of law. The
term ‘death penalty’ is sometimes used interchangeably with capital punishment, although the
imposition of the penalty does not always result in execution (even when upheld on appeal) be-
On July 14th, 1976, the House of Commons passed Bill C-84 on a free vote, abolishing
capital punishment from the Canadian Criminal Code and replacing it with a mandatory life sen-
tence without the possibility of parole for 25 years for all first-degree murders. Canada retained
the death penalty for certain military crimes, such as treason and mutiny, but no soldier has been
charged or executed for these crimes in over 50 years. On December 10th, 1998, Canada com-
pletely abolished the death penalty by passing a law that removed all mentions of capital punish-
The death penalty is described as a cruel, inhuman, and degrading method of punishment.
The ethical and human rights issues raised by hundreds of advocacy groups globally opposing
capital punishment have led to a significant debate worldwide. The methods of implementing the
death penalty have varied across jurisdictions, however, in Canada, hanging was the method
used. The 1959 wrongful conviction of teenage Steven Truscott was a significant factor in shap-
ing national public opinion against the use of the death penalty and towards its outright abolition.
He was sentenced to death for the murder of a classmate, but his sentence was later commuted to
life imprisonment. In 2007, he was fully acquitted of the charges. The potential loss of an inno-
Gayatri Sidhu
214402531
Law and Criminal Psychology
Weekly Response
cent life highlights the gravity of wrongful convictions, and concerns about the state taking peo-
ple’s lives, as well as doubts about the death penalty’s effectiveness as a crime deterrent, remain
Canada and the United States had a similar approach to the death penalty until 1976.
Canada stopped executing people after 1962 and had various pauses in the application of death
penalty. In 1976, Canada’s parliament decided to remove the death penalty from the Criminal
Code. The debate over the death penalty in Canada was particularly heated in the 1950s and
1960s. One of the strongest arguments for abolishing the death penalty was the risk of executing
an innocent person. If a wrongful conviction were discovered years later, there would be no way
to rectify the mistake if the person had already been executed (Canada’s Last Hangings). The
erations, public opinions, legal frameworks, and the acknowledgement of the risks associated
with wrongful convictions. In addition, global movements and a growing emphasis on human
rights and fair justice systems played significant role in bringing this change.
Works Cited:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/capital-punishment
https://amnesty.ca/what-we-do/death-penalty/death-penalty-in-canada/#:~:text=On%20July
%2014%2C%201976%2C%20the,for%20all%20first%2Ddegree%20murders.
Gayatri Sidhu
214402531
Law and Criminal Psychology
Weekly Response
Oykhman, M. Death Penalty in Canada: Can You Be Sentenced to Death in Canada?. Retrieved
https://www.canadashistory.ca/explore/politics-law/canada-s-last-hangings